RESILIENT RED HOOK
sarena rabinowitz & eugene lubomir
3
4
INDEX
CHAPTER 1_
Thesis Thesis Statement Hypothesis & Opportunities
CHAPTER 2_
Site Existing Conditions Site History Timeline Site Visit Walkthrough Mappings
CHAPTER 3_
Future Industry Connectivity Conceptual References
42 44 45 46
Projection: The Armature Strategy Focus Sites Deployment Sequence Conceptual Renders
CHAPTER 5_
10 16 18 20 22 24
Problems & Oppertunities Flooding
CHAPTER 4_
6 7
48 52 52 56
Bibliography Precedents References
61 68
5
THESIS For a city defined by the water’s edge, New York is not known for its integration with the waterfront. Its development has been inward and upward, but not along its periphery. This has resulted in a density that has become the model of modern city’s worldwide – but also resulted in an uneven development of the urban landscape. Red Hook has long existed as a neighborhood on the periphery – both literally and culturally. Consistently defined by its dominant industry, Red Hook has experienced waves of change as its landscape has shifted from marshland, to farmland, to shipping center – and when the shipping industry was irreversibly changed; it experienced a collapse from which it took its new normal. A future Red Hook cannot be wholly invested on a single industry – but instead hedge its future on many – it must become a breeding ground for future industries. Previously a self-sufficient neighborhood where people lived and work, its balance was thrown off when it lost the bulk of its jobs over a short period of time. Currently a place suitable best for those that work from home, its residents have difficulty staying connected with the city at large. A neighborhood disconnected from its city, Red Hook must become open to new and alternative modes of connectivity. Situated entirely in Zone A, Red Hook is in a vulnerable position in event of natural disasters. But unlike other places where risk might be a deterrent, Red Hook possesses the spirit to survive. In order to do so, it will need to reconsider its shortcomings with a more optimistic but weary attitude – hoping for the best, meanwhile, preparing for the worst. It must evolve to both be ready for, and even welcoming of the inevitable flooding. Red Hook was too homogeneous in what it had to offer its residents – too inflexible when it was confronted by change. The future of Red Hook is one of flexibility, openness and new ideas – the future is Resilient Red Hook.
6
HYPOTHESIS An armature responsive to these three issues, could bring a cohesiveness to Red Hook’s disconnected areas of opportunity. Superimposing a new datum and introducing an elevated circulation through a gesture at the scale of the neighborhood, responsive to its context at the scale of the street, we could engage the components and confront them on their shortcomings.
Perhaps the neighborhood can find an alternative to automotive and subway transit… perhaps elevated? suspended? community based? water based?
Red Hook’s collapse resulted from falling behind while innovations arose elsewhere, leaving it redundant and behind – could it be better insured by cultivating its own?
Can Red Hook better insure itself by accepting the inevitable danger of water to a low-lying area? Can its presence and threat be an asset in leveraging the neighborhoods value to the city?
• Develop bike use as culture • Take advantage of red hook’s waterfront access to develop ferry connectivity. • Introduce elevated transportation system that connects to Atlantic terminal. • Unify the waterfront as a site for public pedestrian occupation.
• Attract and cultivate craft workers / a creative enclave. • Develop incentive as a tech center and incubate new business. • Develop water-based transportation
• Invest in better infrastructure to handle drainage. • Reintroduce previously existing marshland to mediate storm surge and clean the water. • Implement ecological instruments, such as oyster reefs. • Build elevated; introduce a new datum, a secondary circulation that becomes primary in an emergency.
7
HYPOTHESIS
8
9
RED HOOK Brooklyn, New York
NEW JERSEY
10
STATEN ISLAND
QUEENS
HOBOKEN MANHATTAN JERSEY CITY
BROOKLYN
11
RED HOOK Brooklyn, New York
1
Container Port
2
Cruise Ship Terminal
3
Van Brunt st.
4
O’Connell Warehouses
5
Fairway
6
Ikea
7
Red Hook Houses
8
Battery Park Tunnel
9
Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (BQE)
12
1
2 8
3
9
4 7 5
4
4 6
13
RESIDENTS
14
TYPOLOGIES
Row-Houses
Warehouses
Multi-Story Public Housing
15
SHIPPING HISTORY
Red Hook’s past is filled with tales of industry and its decline. From the mid 19th century up until the mid 20th century, the Village of Red Hook was considered a main artery of the shipping trade in New York Harbor. With that said, its population during this time was primarily comprised of longshoremen and their families.
Drydock at Todd Shipyards in Red Hook, 1928
Acepelia di dolum et omnime pro blaccaest volorumqui cor ma prae. Sunt, volupti andi verovid que reriam facerat estiae mintem ressiti cusdant volorae nullute sitaspiet et utemoluptae. Aqui od est et molumet mil ex entium ident volor sundis assiniste rest aut officiis aut lab ipsa sectatu restis dent es quo comnis doluptati utem nectur, eserchil invelesto voluptibus. Ellupti issendis sae dolupta vel modigni mendellab in est dolor assequam imusam rentis accaepra nim isit eatur, utas dolest harchicia digenihit exeritior rem. Nam, a
nisitasperem ea cum laborit atiaturis vendaep erumquo exceper iberundande pro qui officte net exernat et et eum Acepelia di dolum et omnime pro blaccaest volorumqui cor ma prae. Sunt, volupti andi verovid que reriam facerat estiae mintem ressiti cusdant volorae nullute sitaspiet et utemoluptae. Aqui od est et molumet mil ex entium ident volor sundis assiniste rest aut officiis aut lab ipsa sectatu restis dent es quo comnis doluptati utem nectur, eserchil invelesto voluptibus. Ellupti issendis sae dolupta vel modigni mendellab in est dolor assequam imusam
16
TRANSPORTATION HISTORY
Street Car running along Smith & Sakett Streets, 1893
BQE Viaduct under construction, 1941
Acepelia di dolum et omnime pro blaccaest volorumqui cor ma prae. Sunt, volupti andi verovid que reriam facerat estiae mintem ressiti cusdant volorae nullute sitaspiet et utemoluptae. Aqui od est et molumet mil ex entium ident volor sundis assiniste rest aut officiis aut lab ipsa sectatu restis dent es quo comnis doluptati utem nectur, eserchil invelesto voluptibus. Ellupti issendis sae dolupta vel modigni mendellab in est dolor assequam imusam rentis accaepra nim isit eatur, utas dolest harchicia digenihit exeritior rem. Nam, a
nisitasperem ea cum laborit atiaturis vendaep erumquo exceper iberundande pro qui officte net exernat et et eum Acepelia di dolum et omnime pro blaccaest volorumqui cor ma prae. Sunt, volupti andi verovid que reriam facerat estiae mintem ressiti cusdant volorae nullute sitaspiet et utemoluptae. Aqui od est et molumet mil ex entium ident volor sundis assiniste rest aut officiis aut lab ipsa sectatu restis dent es quo comnis doluptati utem nectur, eserchil invelesto voluptibus. Ellupti issendis sae dolupta vel modigni mendellab in est dolor assequam imusam
17
TIMELINE 1920
1930
WW1 (1914-18)
1940
1950
WW2 (1939-45)
Coolige
HH
1960
Cold War (1947-1991)
Roosevelt ssevelt (1933-35)
Truman man (1945-53) Eisenhower m
JFK
LBJ Po
Neighborhood Neighborho o in decline... d
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960 1955
Design of the Standard Shipping container developed by Malcom McL & engineer Keith Tantlinger
1950 Mouth of the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel opens up in Red Hook, further cutting off
1945
odel T becomes ecomes the mo m most commerically ful automobile mobile in histor history - stage set for n car culture. tture.
WW2 generates booming business for port industries, jobs soar
1940’s ’’s Ball fields elds and stadium replace the borhood’s depression-era shacks b neighborhood’s
1941 Gowanuss Expressway way completed under Robert w Moses, G i up for BQE, cuttting off Red Girders go u Hook from m the restt ofr Brooklyn
1936 Red Hook’s Pool and Bath-house Bath h opens pens p
18
1970
Nixon
1980
Ford Carter Reagan
1990
2000
Bush Bu Clinton
Bush
2010
2020
Obama
st-Industrial Crime Ridden, desolate neighborhood, severed from rest of Brooklyn
1970
Lean
1980
Recovery...
1990
2000
2010
2020
2009 90% of worlds non-bulk cargo travels by containers stacked on ships
1977 Greg O’ Connel begins buying and restoring warehouses.
1970’s-1980’s
2008
RedHook loses jobs and more than half its population during the financial crisis.
IKEA opens in Red Hook
2006 Fairway Opens Cruise Ship Dock Opens
Late 1900’s Artists occupy studio space in Red Hook’s
1995 Community Outreach in place via the Public Safety Corps
1992 Principle Patrick Daly killed in daylight during drug-related crossfire
1989 19 98 Sew Sewage w treatment plant opens, ending flow w of raw sewage into the Gowanus.
19
SCOPE OF IMPACT
Flood water resulting from the storm surge generated by Hurricane Sandy engulf the streets.
Area residents wade in flood waters the morning following Hurricane Sandy.
Men dispose of shopping carts full of food damaged by Hurricane Sandy at the Fairway supermarket in the Red Hook section of Brooklyn in New York, on October 31, 2012.
Damaged goods and furniture set out for disposal from the basement of a local cafe.
20
THE DAMAGE
Employees and volunteers remove damaged furniture and materials damaged by flood waters from the Beard St. Warehouses in Red Hook
Wood-working tools are laid out to dry after being damaged by flood-water during Hurricane Sandy.
Men and women dispose of damaged furniture and appliances damaged by flood-water.
A street is littered with the ruined contents of residential basements, flowing their flooding during Hurricane Sandy.
21
22
23
MAPPINGS
24
ks s loc ing y B ild Cit d Bu ie cup O c ots tL can Va ace Sp en Op Lots ng rki Pa
VACANCY & OPEN SPACE
NOLI MAP
25
MAPPINGS continued
GRID STUDY 26
FRESH TAX INCENTIVE
k
5 r2 de un k -45 25 k k
-65
-85
45 k+
65 85
ss Ma nd La ool h -sc l Pre choo cS bli Pu ery ram g ll Ga Pro Art hool Sc erAft m seu Mu
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
EDUCATION & YOUTH
27
MAPPINGS continued
on ati ntr nce Co of as Are ots tL can Va ass M nd La
50 00
-18 00 18
50
-19 50 18
00
-19 00
-20 +
50
19 19
00 20
28
VACANT LOTS
BUILDING AGE
ies s ss ilit Ma Fac cture & u nd La Lots Str ng ts & ation Lo rki Pa ned ecre R do an and Ab ace Sp en Op
ust
es liti ility aci & Ut cF bli on es Pu rtati enc o sid nsp Re Tra mily a 2F l 1 & mily ce ercia ffi Fa lti- & O mm Mu rcial l & Co e tia ing ur mm en Co esid fact R nu xed & Ma l ria Mi
Ind
OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
LAND USE
29
MAPPINGS continued
50 00
-18
00
18 50
-19
50
18 00
-19 -20
00 50
19 +
00
19 20
e4 e3
n Zo
e2
n Zo
e1
n Zo n Zo
30
ZONING
FLOOD PLAIN
s
nce
3 6 5
14 8 2
e sid Re ily am 2 F ip 1 & nersh ip w y O rsh Cit wne O ip xed rsh Mi ne p w r O rshi e he Ot Own e vat Pri
n t tio na istric sig de or d ark ark m dm an and ic L ic l tor tor His His sed nated po Pro desig nt rre Cu
11
10 4
12
1
9
15
7
13
LAND OWNERSHIP
HISTORIC LANDMARKS & DISTRICTS
31
MAPPINGS continued
Customers Without Power 50,000 25,000 10,000
Evacuated Zones Riverdale
Fordham
North River Plant
Hunts Point Plant Wards Island Plant Wastewater Treatment Plant Howery hay Plant
Evacuation Zone A
Yorkville
Evacuation Zone B Newton Creek Plant Long Island City
Evacution Zone C
Lower Manhattan
Maspeth
Red Hook Plant Borough Hall Park Place
Crown Heights Park Slope
26th Ward Plant
Port Richmond Plant Owls Head Plant
Flatbush Ocean Parkway
Willowbrook
Coney Island Plant
Fox Hills
Wainwright
Sheepshead Bay
North River Plant
WASTE TREATMENT vs. FLOOD ZONES 32
Fresh Kills
POST-SANDY POWER OUTAGES
of
i rm r Te ine nta t Co t Por cen
ja Ad
th Pa
l
na
ing
dg
Dre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6
Elizabeth Bay Chennel Newark Bay Channel South Elizabeth Channel Arthur Kill Channel Kill van Kull Channel Port Jersey Channel Anchorage Channel Ambrose Channel Bay Ridge Channel
Port Newark Container Terminal Maher Container Terminal APM Container Terminal New York Container Terminal Globe Marine Container Terminal Red Hook Container Terminal
1
6
2 3
9
4
5 7
8
DREDGED CHANNELS
NEW YORK AREA CONTAINER PORTS 33
MAPPINGS continued
PUBLIC TRANSIT POST HURRICANE SANDY COMMUTER FERRY ANNUAL RIDERSHIP 34
l y r Wet tor en ido Inv Corr ds an tream etl lW dS na al an tio Na al Tid ic tor
His
New York City Wetlands
Historic Tidal and Stream Corridor Wetlands
National Wetlands Inventory Wetlands
ds
an PlaNY
NYC WATERSHED SYSTEM
NEW YORK CITY WETLANDS 35
MAPPINGS continued
/12 /03 11 2 - /12 isit /30 e V 09 Sit it 1 is eV Sit
?
COMMERCIAL OVERLAY 36
SITE VISITS
ork tw Ne ail tR igh Fre ard il Y sh Ra ility ellfi sh ac r t F he Po eat t can u Yo
t loa il F rk Ra two e rge Ba Rail N t igh Fre ard il Y ne Ra ility s Zo es ac r t F sin Po al Bu ri ust Ind
NYS WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATIONS
FREIGHT RAIL & BARGE NETWORK
37
MAPPINGS continued
R nR ilto R am eR e Av rt H Fo . RR ntic R Lin St Atla in R s urt Co St. & rie Ba . RR tic Ee en st d an Atl nt an Berg & ru n B lyn Va rook B uth
So
Light Rail Brooklyn Historic Railroad Association
"
"
Completed Trackwork Trackwork in Construction "
1875 RAILROAD ROUTES 38
Proposed Extension
PROPOSED LIGHT RAIL
ad ilro Ra ay, ilw Ra ps 01 Sto 19 p in Sto e, Tra ry t Fer Rou l ay oca bw - L Su ute ough Ro - Thr ck Tru tes ps u Ro s Sto ck u Tru te, B ou sR Bu ute o eR Bik
"
!(
Ferry Terminal Bus Stop
!( (! !(
!( !(
(! !(
"
Subway Entrance (! !(
Subway Route Bus Route Bike Route Truck Route-Local
!( !(
Truck Route-Through
!(
(! !( !(
!(
Railroad
!( !(
!(
(! !(
" !(
!( !(
!(
"
!( !(
!(
!(
! (
!( !(
!(
! ( ( !
! (
(! ! (
!(
(!!( !( !(
(! !(
!(
!(
!(
! (
!( !(
!( (!!(
!( !(
!( !(
!( !(
!(
!( !(
!(
(!
!(
!(
!
!( !(
!(
!(
(! !(
! (
(! ( !! (
! ( ! (
!(
LOCAL TRANSIT
!(
BROOKLYN PUBLIC TRANSIT
Illustrated is the current MTA public transit system overlaid with the system of Brooklyn Rapid transit - the old lines of the Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad, as shown in the Brooklyn Daily Eagle - 1910 39
MAPPINGS continued
Farm Map 1896
Edward Tiscole James Wolocheste
Fred Lud
Peter Montfort Mudde
Cornelis Johnson
Peter Ceasar
Jan Mance
Carret
Pieter Corne
Jorvis
Cornell
Michael Picot Tyson Van Dyke
Claes Jansen
Remsen
Mathius Van Dyke
Jordan
Luqueers
Gerret Wolph Jacob Stoffeise
Muick Aertse
Van Dyke Mill Pond
Frederick Lubbertse Coles
18th CENTURY PLANTATIONS 40
19th CENTURY FARMS
101
211
165
101
Source: GrowNYC
21st CENTURY GARDENS
SOIL TYPES 41
SENSITIVITY TO FLOODING Acceptance Zone Sacrificial program at ground level Allows water to flood the first level without damage
Toleration Zone Temporary ground level program Accommodates flexible programs, movable if necessary Programs partially accessible from ground level, only where unavoidable
Prevention Zone Special measures taken to prevent flood water from reaching program located here
42
43
DOMINANT PROGRAMS IN SECTION l tia en l sid ria Re dust In ht Lig rcial me m Co
44
45
INSPIRATION VENICE Challenges and Opportunities
Pedestrians walk atop scaffolding errected by the city to cross a flooded Piazza San Marco at acqua alta, or high water, in Venice. The scaffolding is a temporary structure that is taken down by workers when the waters recede.
Nomally croweded by tourists, a flooded San Marco discourages pedestrian occupation, but enables alternative, water based transportation. This man explores Venice’s main square with his kayak.
ELEVATED TRAINS Challenges and Opportunities
Elevated trains allow for the continuation of activity below, while hosting an accessible form of transportation above. The structure is both a magnet for activity, and a visual boundary.
46
The High-Line Park in the Chelsea neighborhood of NYC allows pedestrians to occupy the city on a new, elevated plane.
AN ELEVATED PLANE alternatives to ground-level occupation
Union Station Greenway, Washington D.C.
Lujiazui Pedestrian Bridge, Shanghai, China
ELEVATED OCCUPATION protection from ground-level threats, priveledged vantage, and creation of an in-between space.
Vanke Center, Shenzhen, China
Giant Group Campus , Shanghai, China
47
ARMATURE Industry / Connectivity / Flooding
ARMATURE Industry / Connectivity / Flooding
PHASED DEPLOYMENT SEQUENCE
phase 1
1
5
2 4
3
PRIMARY ARMATURE
cu Fo
es Sit ture a cus Fo Arm ry ma Pri
sS
FOCUS SITES
s
ite
1 2 3 4 5
52
Red Hook Container Port / Cruise Ship Terminal Red Hook Houses Columbia Street Pier Under BQE Over BQE
response to focus sites
phase 2
phase 3
SECONDARY ARMATURE
ARMATURE HOSTS TRANSPORTATION
ts t lo can Va re atu Arm
ies nc aca /V re es atu Sit rm cus l Fo Rai ary A ed nd vat co Ele & Se ry ma Pri
response to vacant lots
elevated rail
53
ARMATURE INSTIGATES FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
tes es t si Sit en c u s il Fo d Ra lopm e ve vat de Ele re & atu Arm
54
ARMATURE INSTIGATES NEW PROGRAMS
es sit nt il pme Ra ed velo vat de Ele re & atu Arm
1 2 3 4
Wetlands Park Ferry Terminal Recreation / Evacuation Center Distributed Incubator Sites
2
3
4
1
55
60
PRECEDENTS
CITIES_
Adaptive Reuse on the Industrial Waterfront Puerto Madero Toronto Waterfront HafenCity
64 66 68
61
PUERTO MADERO Buenos Aires, Argentina
62
The old Port of Buenos Aires, Argentina, Puerto Madero, is comprised of 650 acres filled with once underutilized or abandoned docks and warehouse buildings. The redevelopment plan creates four new districts: a mixed use district, a government and commercial trade district, a residential district, and an institutional/free-trade district. Vital to the success of the entire development is the transportation system serving it. A new highway adjacent to Puerto Madero ensures maximum utilization and convenience of use. Throughout the plan, adaptive re-use of as many older buildings as possible is emphasized. These buildings, emblematic of Puerto Madero’s shipping past, will find new life as restaurants, offices, cultural buildings, retail shops, and residences, and will provide a counterpoint to the many new low, mid, and high rise buildings in the
redeveloped area. The Urban Development Project in Puerto Madero transforms a vast underutilized railway and port area through a state initiative to promote a new model of active political and strategies concerted public and private sector. The reconversion project was based on the area to save it from neglect and deterioration reordered to balance the urban character and preserve its activities that require central location public and private offices, commercial and cultural services and residential were not in the urban areas of land and proper environment context, and restore the relationship with the river entering public areas for recreation and relaxation.
63
WATERFRONT TORONTO Toronto, Canada
Waterfront Toronto is building the largest urban revitalization project in North America. It brings together sustainable technology, excellence in urban design, real estate development, leading technology infrastructure and the delivery of important public policy objectives. The main focus of the project is reconnecting the people with the waterfront. Most of the previously industrial space is being reimagined to a public recreational waterfront. There is an overarching emphasis on increasing parks and public space and encouraging environmentally and economically sustainable design. The edge where the city meets the water is called the ‘blue edge’ where previously underused and unappreciated space is being transformed to a public asset for the community. East Bayfront will feature 6,000 residential units, including 1,200 affordable residences, and millions of square feet of employment space able to accommodate 8,000 jobs. The area will also be a hub for retail, entertainment and cultural amenities and will be easily accessible by public transportation.
1974
1959
1912
1886
Central Waterfront East Bayfront West Don Lands Lower Don Lands
1834
Upper Port Lands Lower Port Lands
64
Waterfront Toronto plans to transform the largely underutilized industrial area into new sustainable parks and communities. The naturalization and shifting of the mouth of the Don River is the centrepiece of the plans for the Lower Don Lands. This part of the site is being transformed from former industrial lands into a sustainable, mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly, riverside community. The revitalized West Don Lands will feature 6,000 new residential units, ample employment and commercial space, at least one elementary school, and two child-care centres, all surrounded by 23 acres of parks and public spaces.
Much of the area is also in the flood plain of the Don River and flood protection must be created before the area can be fully developed.
The Port Lands are man-made and were created by decades of infilling what was once the largest wetland on the Great Lakes. Beginning in the 1880s, the area was gradually filled in to make more land available for industry and shipping. Since it was created, most of the Port Lands have been utilized for industrial uses and the majority of the area currently lacks servicing for other uses.
65
HAFENCITY
Hamburg, Germany
HafenCity reveals one approach to tackling future-adaptive urban development. The raised roadways and buildings, water resilient surfaces, floating waterfront promenades, terraced landscapes and bridges all work together as important infrastructure and create an architecturally vibrant district that connects residents to the waterfront while also making the whole area resilient in the face of more frequent flooding. In addition to its water adaptive design strategies, HafenCity exemplifies many other sustainable urban planning ideas. It is dense, walkable, bikeable, served by public transit, and full of multi-use buildings and public spaces. Much of the land was formerly brownfields and has now been cleaned and developed. Additionally, the historic character of the area is honored. Many buildings in the neighboring Speicherstadt area have been refurbished and some buildings in HafenCity, like the new concert hall, adaptive reuse existing buildings.
66
HafenCity Hamburg is a project of city-planning where the old port warehouses of Hamburg are being replaced with offices, hotels, shops, official buildings, and residential areas. The project is the largest rebuilding project in Europe in scope of landmass. The area of the HafenCity used to be part of the free port, but with the decreased economic importance of free ports in an era of European Union free trade, large container ships and increased border security, the Hamburg free port was reduced in size, removing the current HafenCity area from its restrictions. When completely developed, it will be home to about 12,000 people and the workplace of 40,000 people mostly in office complexes.
The relationship here between water level, quay walls and edges, pontoons, watercraft and buildings is continuously shifting.reated before the area can be fully developed. Because HafenCity has so many different levels of public space there are many interesting points of interaction between levels. In HafenCity quarter proper, the terraces are the sites of the most dramatic places of transition. They link the waterfront to the streets above; stepping up from sea level (0 m), to promenade level (4.5 m) to street level (7.5 m).
Floating docks are accessible at sea level, which changes twice daily: The pontoons of the Traditional Ship Harbor provide a level of urban perception which rises and falls with the tide. Since the water level of the River Elbe varies twice daily by more than 3 meters, depending on the ebb and flow of the tide, perception of the quarter is constantly changing.
67
RESILIENT REDHOOK degree project research school of architecture pratt institute brooklyn, NY
2