10/20/2010

Page 1

FREE | Take one Week of Oct. 20, 2010 | Vol. 36, Iss 7

The

Mirror

fairfieldmirror.com

Foley vs. Malloy: Gubernatorial Debate at Fairfield

The Independent Student Newspaper of Fairfield University The Reflection of Fairfield

CT Post Needs Clam Jam 101 Course By Mirror Editorial Staff Opinion

Photo Illustrastion by Peter Caty/The Mirror

Republican Candidate Tom Foley (left) and Democratic Candidate Dan Malloy (right) debated live at the Quick Center Tuesday.

By Alexandria Hein News Editor The live televised Connecticut gubernatorial debate between Democratic candidate Dan Malloy and Republican Candidate Tom Foley took place at the Quick Center on Tuesday. Supporters lined the streets in the hours leading up to the event, holding signs like, “Women for Foley,” and “Carpenters for Malloy.” Malloy arrived first, in a grey Mercury truck featuring a broken left taillight. Foley later pulled onto campus in his large infamous campaign bus. The debate was co-moderated by

Eyewitness News anchor and Face the State host, Dennis House and WNPR news director and host of “Where We Live,” John Dankosky. Father von Arx walked out on the stage and introduced the candidates, reminding attendees to turn off their cell phones, quipping, he hoped, they would listen to a Priest. Then came the silence. Click. Click. Cough. “3 minutes,” said one moderator. “2 minutes,” he said after what felt like 5. More camera shutters were heard, and finally the cliché baby cry. When House and Dankosky finally got the go ahead, the rules were laid out for candidates, “Two minutes to answer

each question, 30 seconds to respond,” and then the first question was asked. Malloy had to respond first to a question pertaining to his hypothetical first 100 days in office, and what he would do to fix the record high unemployment rate in Connecticut. Malloy answered, promising to make the government more transparent, by saying that he would let the citizens know just how deep the hole that has been dug is, and show them a plan that will get them “out and over the tough times we are in.” Among other things he vowed to change electric rates, “get off the backs of small business owners,” and

Debate| page 3

It’s a Hard-Knock Beach Life, For Stags By Janelle Cecco Staff Writer For Fairfield University seniors, life is a beach and they are just playing in the sand. But for beach residents, life is a bitch. Local year-round beach residents and The Connecticut Post continue to complain about the “Animal House partying,” at the beach this fall. National publications like the Princeton Review continue to slam the university for poor town-gown relations, ranking Fairfield number 17 on the list, an improvement to the number two spot it had in 2001. There is constant, “yelling and screaming that wakes people up after 11 p.m. It even happens during the daytime.

I don’t understand,” said Fairfield Beach Resident Associations (FBRA) president Paige Herman. According to Herman, that is then number one issue between Fairfield students and the locals. But Chief of Police at the Fairfield Police Department Gary MacNamara recently told The Mirror that the situation at the beach this year has been better. The Mirror recently convened a round table discussion with the Fairfield police and president of the FBRA, along with one-on-one discussions with the Assistant Director of Resident Life at Fairfield University and students living at the beach. We found a few disagreements about the disruptiveness of the partying at the beach. Here are the four different

perspectives on the partying done by Fairfield University beach residents.

Fairfield Police: Law Enforcers Although it is their job to issue tickets and make arrests, police insist they are not out to get students. For them, “Maintaining peace in the area is our main goal,” said Chief MacNamara. If the police receive a phone call, they are required to go to the house and asses the situation. This is where the “no warning,” policy comes into play. If the police are contacted, and the house they investigate is loud, disruptive and/ or unreasonable, a ticket will be issued. “Large gatherings with alcohol being

Beach Life | page 7

Inside This Issue

Q&A With Muslim Campus Chaplain See P. 9

Chefs Table Comes to the Library See P. 11

Fairfield Students + Fairfield Beach = Drunk. It seems any time these two concepts are mentioned the same conclusion is always made. We saw it happen last week when The Connecticut Post ran an editorial titled “Students need Clam Jam 101 course.” Fairfield students conceptualized Clam Jam 101; it’s The Connecticut Post who has yet to attend. The Post stated, “Fairfield University needs to move swiftly to stop any resurgence of ‘Animal House’ partying by its students at Fairfield Beach.” Well, we wish there were “Animal House” partying going on at the beach. It would be much more fun. Any state school party scene makes the Fairfield party scene look like a high school house party. We can all attest that when visiting other schools we have seen the sheer destructive nature of partying students. Glass tables are broken and front doors ripped apart as cops show up to the party. Compared to these other schools, Fairfield student debauchery is pretty tame. We might be a bit loud, we might urinate in public places, and we might drop a few beer cans along the way, but we aren’t leaving a path of pricey destruction in our wake. We pay enough to live in the beachside houses. As for The Connecticut Post, we have yet to meet an Otter, Boon, or Bluto down on Fairfield Beach Road, nor have we seen the First Selectman’s daughter returned to his house via a shopping cart. So let’s lay off the Animal House name-calling; you just sound like Neidermeyer. We have decided to look at beach life critically, putting aside the old argument that involves complaining about partying students after buying a house down by the beach. Too often, students dismiss the complaint, relating it to the same as buying a house next to train tracks and complaining that trains wake you up every morning. Clearly the point has been made by now - we are not perfect neighbors and year-round residents should have known better. We are not students who just want to party all the time. We are students at a respectable university. The beach is not an ideal situation for any parties currently involved. College students are finally let loose from the scrutiny that comes with living on campus and now are free and able to have kegs and larger parties. Year-round residents simply want to be able to go to sleep before midnight and not be woken up by students’ drunken antics. Students pay high rental rates. Year round residents pay big bucks for their property. Everybody thinks they are entitled to their own way of life, and all live within spitting distance of each other. It is sheer madness. The University’s only concern is that the beach damages the school’s reputation and strains town and gown relations. Whether or not the administration is willing to admit it or not, we all know they would be happier if there were no beach. We understand that for an up and coming school like Fairfield, the old partying mentality from

Clam Jam | page 7

Red Sea Madness Success See P. 24


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
10/20/2010 by The Fairfield Mirror - Issuu