Ag Department sees need to support local food networks in Minnesota

By DAN GUNDERSON Minnesota Public Radio News

Farmers markets and local food networks aren’t new to Minnesota. But the movement gained momentum during the pandemic — and a partnership of more than 40 organizations hopes to capitalize on that grassroots growth.

“The local food movement coming out of the pandemic took root. There is a lot of movement in this now,” said Kathy Zeman executive director of the Minnesota Farmers Market Association. “We’ve just reached 362 farmers markets. It’s the highest number of farmers markets we’ve ever recorded in the state of Minnesota.”

There has also been growth in online connections between farmers and consumers.

Sazzy Calhoun works in the film industry, so she was sidelined when COVID-19 shut down film production.

In May of 2020, from her home in the north metro, she decided to start a Facebook group with the goal of connecting farmers and consumers.

“I started it just because of the need that I was seeing out in the world during COVID-19. I remember I sat there with my finger on the [keyboard] button, and I thought, ‘Is this really silly? Am I going to be a group of one person?’”

But in a case of right place, right time, Farm Direct Minnesota took off and it’s still growing nearly three years later. The group has about 75,000 members and still attracts about 900 new members a month.

“I think there is going to be sustainability as long as people want fresh food and see the value in that, and I don’t think they’re going to stop seeing that value,” said Calhoun.

Christina Traeger was among the first farmers to join the Farm Direct Facebook group, offering a quarter or a half side of beef for sale.

“It brought us a connection, together with people who needed that quarter or half because their freezer was empty,” she recalled.

Traeger had been selling directly to consumers for about a decade from her farm near Avon, Minn. She used her own Facebook page and a website to sell beef, pork, lamb and poultry.

The new Facebook group expanded her marketing reach, but also brought marketing challenges.

“You get the people who will come on there and say, ‘Well, I can get this for $3.99 at Walmart,’” she said of the occasional online trolls.

“We take a lot of pride in what we produce as farmers. If somebody is saying things that are not very polite, you know you kind of get feeling bad, going ‘What did I do wrong?’” she said.

“But on the flip side you get 20 people who are just super tickled. They saw my post on Farm Direct and they came to the market and came to the farm and picked stuff up and messaged me the next day and said that was the best meat they’ve ever had.”

Traeger believes direct marketing is the future for her farm even though the challenges of running a farm and a direct marketing business can be overwhelming at times.

In the future, she and other small farmers might get more support.

A new initiative funded by a federal grant and led by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and the University of Minnesota is taking a deeper look at the needs of small farmers and local food systems with the intention of creating a strategic plan for supporting local food systems.

“We’ve never collected data like this before, we’re already really excited to be learning from it,” said regional marketing specialist Kate Seybold.

For the past two years, the state ag department has been building relationships with small farmers and BIPOC communities to gather data and ideas about local food networks.

They’ve learned that many small farmers are not participating in the federal USDA Census of Agriculture, the benchmark for data about agriculture. That leaves a void in knowledge about local food production and networks.

“This data is really helpful to have, both from the producer side but then also our supply chain partners and consumer side,” said Seybold. “We’ll be using to kind of inform what that strategic action plan looks like.”

While the agency is still developing specific action steps from the data, Seybold says it’s clear there is enough interest and economic benefit to support a more strategic approach to local food systems in the state.

The work so far is exposing challenges.

“One of the things that really stands out is people see this type of work in many, many different places, a lot of people are involved in it, it’s just that it’s like we’re all siloed,” said University of Minnesota professor Hikaru Peterson.

“Even just to put this statewide cooperative partnership work forward, we realized that ‘Oh, there’s somebody else who’s kind of doing something similar,’ and you really have to collaborate.”

The research also pointed out that many

BIPOC groups don’t trust institutions like the Department of Agriculture. So the group invested a lot of time in building relationships, said Seybold, and that effort needs to be ongoing.

Better data collection is also a critical need according to Peterson.

“There’s just a lack of market transparency because of the lack of data infrastructure.”

While commodity agriculture — corn and soybeans — has decades of data around production and market prices, the same data infrastructure does not exist for local food producers.

“And if there’s a way of providing like a real-time market data in local and regional markets that these small and medium size farmers can use, I think it can really benefit and strengthen the support as well,” said Peterson.

Another apparent area of agreement is the need for more investment in infrastructure such as community commercial kitchens for safe food production, community cold storage and community food hubs. Those all require capital investments small farmers often can’t access, but are needed to support the connection between farmer and consumer.

“And it doesn’t matter whether you’re in a sparsely populated township in the county in Greater Minnesota, or you are in a densely populated part of the Twin Cities where there’s like one grocery store left,” said Zeman.

State investment in that infrastructure is likely to be one of the recommendations when the final report on supporting local and regional food markets is completed later this year. n

By COLTON KEMP colton.kemp@apgsomn.com

One of the most important aspects for attracting wildlife is “replicating nature,” according to River Bend Nature Center Naturalist Matt Johnson. Johnson explained this and more at River Bend on Saturday afternoon, during what would’ve been a presentation about attracting wildlife. However, since no one registered for the event, it was cancelled.

Instead he sat down with the Daily News to outline some key advice for people looking to attract wildlife to their yard.

“Really (we’re) just trying to get people to plant more natives,” he said. “You know, they’re designed to grow here. They’re adapted to the climate too. All the pollinators need them. So, we try to mimic nature. That really (attracts) the most wildlife.”

One thing Johnson pointed out is that “not all nonnative plants are bad.”

“There’s a lot that can live in your garden and it’s fine,” he said. “If you think about annuals — plants that don’t come back the next year — they don’t pose any threat. There’s a lot of others if you look online. A lot of the times, they’ll have good lists of plants that are not going to get out of your garden and into nature.”

However, many of the nonnative plants that were introduced to beautify gardens, wound up becoming invasive species in the local environment. One of those nonnatives is a purple wildflower called dame’s rocket.

“That was brought over as a garden flower, and it’s a very pretty flower,” he said. “But if you ever come back, usually sometime late May, early June, it’s just kind of everywhere. It can outcompete native species. So, it’s become a thing we’re trying to tackle.

“Buckthorn is another one that was brought over. It’s kind of like a shrub, a hedge. That’s really taken off and really affected the natural ecosystem, here in the forests.”

Another big thing for attracting several kinds of wildlife is implementing a water source. Even something as simple as a birdbath can have an impact.

“It’s kind of funny,” Johnson said. “I have a birdbath and it kind of attaches to my deck. And tree frogs will actually hide underneath it during the day, because they usually more come out in the evening at night. … During the evening, they can just go right up on top. So, they’ll get right out and then they hunt.”

Native berries and cherries attract birds and other wildlife. Anything that provides food, like fruit, is good for wildlife, Johnson said.

For bird feeders, Johnson said it’s important to put stickers or something on the glass, so birds don’t fly into the glass and injure themselves.

Squirrels and deer can ruin the experience of bird feeders, Johnson noted. Keeping them out of reach for deer is vital to not having the feeder destroyed.

Squirrels are a bit more persistent and can “empty the feeder” in one sitting. Having a substance called suet is able to mitigate that issue. Suet is a mix of various foods that can be kept in a small cage, preventing squirrels from accessing it while still allowing birds to peck away.

When it comes to having a healthy garden and being environmentally aware of the impact a garden has, Johnson said accommodating pollinators is important. Bees and butterflies, especially monarchs, are at risk of extinction.

Native flowers, milkweed and butterfly weed are good for attracting pollinators.

“Milkweeds are what they eat when they’re caterpillars, and so it’s kind of that larval food for them,” Johnson said. “It’s really the only thing they eat. So, if we didn’t have any milkweed, we would not have any monarch butterflies. That’s why you’ve seen like a big decline in monarch populations.

He attributed the decline to farming and ditch mowing and “just the clearing of a lot of those native prairies.” n