16 MfE firm on winter grazing dates Vol 19 No 40, October 19, 2020
farmersweekly.co.nz
$3.95
Incl GST
FEPs must be farmer-led Richard Rennie richard.rennie@globalhq.co.nz
W
ITH the need for farm environment plans (FEPs) confirmed in freshwater regulations, farmers are casting about in a crowded market for what constitutes a definitive template. Waikato farm advisor Rob Macnab has been working closely with King Country River Care, facilitating FEP workshops and says it may be a catchmentdriven approach that defines plan development. The group, comprising 300 drystock farmers, recently received $844,000 from the Government to work on improving freshwater quality and adjusting farming practices. The group has been increasingly regarded as a benchmark for farmer groups seeking a way forward through regulations using farm environment planning. “At the moment, there are a lot of people jostling in this space, with good intentions but not always the best outcomes for farmers. It is almost as though we are trying to change jockeys in the middle of the horse race – farmers are on board, but are being told they have to change,” Macnab said He is confident more clarity around FEP sourcing and implementing will develop in coming months, but is urging farmers to stand up and be clear about what their plans should look like, and how they come together. “The King Country River Care group is the best I have seen so far. It is one where farmers are saying
‘this is what we want for our area’,” he said. He is urging professionals and industry groups to go back and talk to farmer groups, and be guided by them. “Otherwise farmers will get something designed by a committee,” he said. He believes there will ultimately be certified FEP providers who are able to provide an approved version of a FEP, without it necessarily being a fixed template. “A certified FEP provider could have the ability to allow for what farmer groups need, and as long as the FEP meets regulatory requirements, it could be used,” he said. He expects the farmer groups may be defined on a catchment basis, but acknowledges this may cut across industry group efforts to formulate a plan. “But what works in Waikato will But what works in not work in Southland. It is not heresy to challenge the industry Waikato will not work groups’ work, but they may have in Southland. It is not to become quite nimble in how heresy to challenge the they respond to what farmers need,” he said. industry groups’ work, AgFirst director James Allen says but they may have to at present the FEP situation has become quite nimble become frustrating and complex. “There is a lot of confusion in how they respond to around the plans and it risks what farmers need. causing some inertia among farmers who may want to get an FEP done,” he said. Rob Macnab He says it was now well Total Ag accepted a FEP would be required, but the devil was in the details around aspects of slope, fencing good base to start from,” he said. and wintering, for example. He was confident any additional “This is causing uncertainty. But on the flip side, we are encouraged FEP requirements could be worked into these plans. by the efforts being made by Hey says there also seems to processors, including Fonterra, be widespread support for a Miraka and Tatua. TheyCERTIFICATE have been OF LICENCE catchment process andasthat they chipping away. TheirThisplans a grants the Certificateoffer of Licence use of the New Zealand Made trademark a trusted
INERTIA: James Allen cautions that confusion around FEPs risks losing farmers who want to be proactive and get their plans together sooner than later.
are in support of that approach. Canterbury consultant Charlotte Glass says her company’s approach under the region’s Land and Water Plan has been to develop a customised plan for each client. “If you have a property that requires a consent, then usually FEPs are scheduled under that consent, so no matter what else we provide it has to comply with that (Land and Water Plan),” she said. She says it was vital to any FEP and its requirements were recognised as only one part of the entire farm system. She maintained most Canterbury farmers were accepting of FEPs, having operated under numerous plan changes over the years. “But in Southland, it is all a bit new. But it also comes down to the way you ask someone to do a job,
that makes a difference,” she said. “I think most of our farmers right now are just experiencing some issues about the way they are being engaged with, that’s what they don’t like. “After all, the primary industry strategy for the past 100 years has been production focused and now they are being asked to turn it into an environmental focus. “They just seek a bit more understanding that the direction has been changed on them.” She challenged the Government to make the funding that was tagged for helping farmers to transition more readily accessible. Farm consultants have confirmed that behind the scenes government officials are working on developing a standardised approach to FEPs and a certification process is being developed for rural professionals to sign off on FEPs.
mark of authenticity for qualifying products of the following business
Farmgear Ltd
806738 LICENCE NO. https://buynz.org.nz/farmgear
The Ultimate farm mower hands down MAXAM Mowers are incredible versatile machines that farmers rely on for all their topping and pasture management. The clean cut and full spread of conditioned grass is unique worldwide. Safe, reliable, robust, and easy to use. 30/06/2021
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BUY NEW ZEALAND MADE CAMPAIGN LTD
EXPIRY DATE
BUYNZ.ORG.NZ
Call us today 0800 108 563 or visit
www.maxammowers.co.nz