ILLINOIS AGRICULTURE in the Classroom will use a grant from the Walmart Foundation to expand its after-school ag literacy program. ........................................2
U. S. REP. TIM JOHNSON favors elimination of the “death tax” but does not see the chances of that happening because of the revenue the estate tax generates. ................................4
A UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS crop science professor last week told farmers that if they have problems with resistant waterhemp, their troubles likely will only get worse. ..........7
Monday, August 23, 2010
Two sections Volume 38, No. 34
Task force mulls options
Money scarce, choices few in farm bill debate BY MARTIN ROSS FarmWeek
Periodicals: Time Valued
With only two major ag spending “buckets” left to tap and even nutrition funding — a supposedly sacred cow — no longer strictly sacred, a Washington analyst warns new farm bill ideas likely will require some sacrifice. Given current indications, “We’re actually going to lose money in the (2012) farm bill,” American Farm Bureau Federation policy specialist Tara Smith advised Illinois Farm Bureau’s Farm Policy Task Force (FPTF) last week. Beyond the forthcoming 2011 budget reconciliation battle to retain ag funding, Smith cited the possibility of a second round of budget debate in 2012. House Ag Committee Chairman Collin Peterson (DMinn.), a farm program defender who nonetheless seeks fiscal responsibility in future ag spending, pledged “I will not ask for money outside the farm bill budget.” During 2008 farm bill debate, House Ways and Means and Senate Finance committees ultimately “pumped in” an added $10 billion — money quickly
diverted to nutrition — and for Peterson, “it was a very frustrating process,” Smith noted. Food stamp and related programs have received large funding increases over the past three years, but the Senate somewhat surprisingly has targeted some of that money to fund other areas (House action is
expected by lateSeptember), and she suggests champions of those programs could seek to recoup that money, potentially placing “a target on our (ag’s) backs.” In addition, USDA’s new administrative agreement with crop insurance providers trims $4 billion from the system purportedly for deficit reduction. While Peterson may see that as
advanced “Brownie points” for the budget debate, “I’m not really sure that’s going to hold true,” Smith said. “Anyone with new ideas, new programs, changes to (farm) programs that cost money are really going to have to be cognizant of where they’d like to take that money from, within the farm program pot,” she told FarmWeek. “Direct payments are about $5 billion per year; crop insurance is about $6 billion. Once you look beyond those two
buckets of money, there really isn’t a lot to be had within farm programs. “Those programs are certainly going to be the targets. We’ve seen crop insurance take one hit. The question is whether it will be ready to take another, or will direct payments be the primary funding mechanism for changes?” Smith reported Peterson has “drawn a line” against tapping 2012 commodity funding to See Farm bill, page 4
Crop conditions deteriorate in Illinois BY DANIEL GRANT FarmWeek
The extreme heat and dry weather that prevailed for much of the first three weeks of August reduced crop yield potential in Illinois, based on recent yield tours. The Pro Farmer Midwest Crop Tour last week estimated Illinois’ corn yield at 166.5 bushels per acre, down 2.2 percent from the three-year average, according to Roger Bernard, director of the eastern portion of the Pro Farmer tour. The Soy Capital Ag Services corn yield estimates in McLean County found the same trend. The estimated average yield in McLean County was 182.8 bushels per acre, down about 11 bushels from Soy Capital’s projected yield the past three years. “You could really see the tip-back (where kernel development was aborted at the end of ears),” said Chad Hoke, assistant vice president and farm manager with Soy Capital Ag Services in Bloomington. “That had to do with the heat and dry weather.” Hoke believes soil compaction from last year’s wet harvest and plant competition also played a role in lowering corn yield potential. Participants on the Soy
Capital yield tour found the highest plant population and ear counts ever recorded on the tour. But they also found the average ear length this year to be the shortest in McLean County since 2001. “Compaction is playing a role in this year’s yield,” Hoke said. “We expect to see a lot of fall tillage to help alleviate that.” The Soy Capital tour also found corn after soybeans appears to have the best yield potential (188 bushels per acre) compared to continuous corn (176 bushels) and second-year
corn (164 bushels). Tour results are available online at {www.soycapitalag.com}. Meanwhile, soybean pod counts taken in Illinois during the Pro Farmer tour were up 16 percent. But production of some soy plants has slowed due to sudden death syndrome in many of the 122 fields that were scouted statewide. USDA earlier this month projected statewide yield averages in Illinois (based on Aug. 1 conditions) of 180 bushels per acre for corn, up six bushels from last year, and 49 bushels
per acre for soybeans, up three bushels from a year ago. However, crop condition ratings declined between July 19 and Aug. 16. The portion of the crops rated poor or very poor during that time increased from 10 percent to 13 percent for corn and from 8 percent to 11 percent for beans. The rest of the state’s corn crop last week was rated 63 percent good to excellent and 24 percent fair while the remaining bean crop was rated 64 percent good to excellent and 25 percent fair.
Corn harvest began last week in some southern regions of the state. Here, Jesse Drew of Benton in Franklin County works on a field of 105-day corn near Ewing that was planted April 20. The moisture level was 17.2 percent with a yield estimate of 140 bushels per acre. Corn yield estimates put the county’s average at 133.5 bushels per acre. (Photo by Larry Miller, Franklin County Farm Bureau manager)
FarmWeek on the web: FarmWeekNow.com
Illinois Farm Bureau®on the web: www.ilfb.org