THE CHICAGO PUBLIC schools are interested in buying Illinois-grown fruit and vegetables to serve nearly 305,000 students.........2
A NEW PEST invading Illinois fields? No, just an insectresembling implement designed by a father and son team. ............3
WHILE SOME AREAS are still getting too much rain, others, such as this field in Iroquois County, are in desperate need of moisture. ........7
Monday, July 26, 2010
Two sections Volume 38, No. 30
Economist: Ethanol credit analysis a ‘So what?’ report BY MARTIN ROSS FarmWeek
A congressional report on the “cost” of the federal ethanol tax credit makes for an ultimately unsatisfying read, according to an energy industry consultant. John Urbanchuk, technical director with the natural resources/environmental man-
agement consulting firm ENTRIX, challenges the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) conclusion that under the credit, U.S. taxpayers pay $1.78 for every gallon of gasoline replaced by equivalent ethanol use. The U.S. House Ways and Means Committee reportedly is eyeing a 20 percent reduction in the 45-cent-per-gallon
ethanol blenders credit set to expire Dec. 31. The measure, which would include a year’s extension of the credit and a 54-cent-per-gallon tariff on imported ethanol, may be part of a “green jobs” bill expected within the next two weeks. By itself, CBO’s credit cost estimate “doesn’t tell you anything,” Urbanchuk said. The
NO CHARM HERE
The third time was not a charm for this portion of a drowned out soybean field on the farm of Ron Moore, left, and Larry Moore, right, in Warren County. Neighbor Don Chipman helps survey the damage. The Moores replanted this field twice after the initial crop was drowned out but had no luck establishing a crop on five acres. The remaining crop suffered some water damage. Last week heat stress also became an issue for the crops. See more about current crop conditions on page 7. (Photo by Ken Kashian)
For more on ethanol policy impacts, see page 4 “‘So what?’ report” fails to consider ethanol’s offsetting “value and importance” and “comparative costs” associated with imported petroleum, he said. American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) senior economist Bob Young argued credit availability spurs plant investment. Ethanol incentives foster “another domestically available (fuel) supply” during major petroleum price run-ups, Young added. “If it costs $1.78 to replace a gallon of gasoline with corn ethanol, what’s the cost to taxpayers of that gallon of gasoline?” Urbanchuk posed. “(The report) doesn’t give you any kind of a comparative measure to decide whether that $1.78 is good or bad. If that number was $1, would that be better? If it were $2, how much worse would it be? “The $1.78 would be offset by the revenue taxpayers would get as a consequence of the economic activity generated by the presence of the ethanol industry. A healthy domestic ethanol industry improves national security. It improves our energy security; it maintains our manufacturing sector.”
A 2005 CBO report noted capital investments such as oil field leases and drilling equipment are taxed at an effective 9 percent rate vs. a 25 percent average U.S. business rate. Plus, the industry receives an estimated $4 billion a year in tax credits, and Urbanchuk calls costs of militarily securing sea lanes crucial to oil transportation a “hidden subsidy.” Farm Bureau supports a measure by Collinsville Republican Rep. John Shimkus and Earl Pomeroy (D-N.D.) that would renew ethanol incentives through 2015. Growth Energy, a coalition that includes several ethanol producers, proposes phasing out corn ethanol credits in favor of ethanol infrastructure funding.. CBO conceded the negative impact that January expiration of the biodiesel blenders’ tax credit has had on that sector, and predicted ethanol consumption would drop 32 percent in the absence of the ethanol credit. “I read ‘consumption’ and ‘production’ as basically the same,” said Urbanchuk, who projects a potential 37 percent drop in U.S. production without the blenders’ credit. Removal of the credit endangers 112,000 jobs, AFBF and the National Corn Growers Association warned lawmakers last week.
Periodicals: Time Valued
Will wind energy development spread from core areas? New assessment, grid issues key BY KAY SHIPMAN FarmWeek
News that Illinois has better wind resources than originally believed coupled with recent transmission constraints may lead wind energy developers to move into new territory, according to Dave Loomis, Illinois State University (ISU) economics professor and director of the Center for Renewable Energy. “I think we will see wind
development move south (in the state) and be more spread out,” Loomis said. “We are starting to see transmission constraints in some of the windiest areas, (development) shifting lower (from the north-central area), and counties have to deal with wind ordinances that never had to before,” Loomis explained. Part of that shift is due to a 2010 Department of Energy (DOE) map developed by AWS Truewind. The map showed more regions of the state have good wind
FarmWeek on the web: FarmWeekNow.com
resources at higher elevations (shown in red on the accompanying map). “The new wind maps are
FarmWeekNow.com Check out the new wind development in the Midwest by going to FarmWeekNow.com.
good news for Illinois,” said Wes Slaymaker, one of the pioneers of Illinois wind energy and president of WES Engineering Inc. A 2003 DOE wind map, which sparked the first wind
farms, showed good wind resources exist in Bureau and Lee counties. “That’s why the first (wind) farms went there, but a (new) better assessment shows better wind resources are in the McLean County area,” Slaymaker added. The new map assesses wind speeds at 80 meters or about 262 feet, higher than the 50meter elevation of the earlier map. Even the caramel-colored regions that surround the red areas have good wind resources. “We’re seeing larger and See Wind, page 2
Illinois Farm Bureau®on the web: www.ilfb.org