FarmWeek Aug. 17 2009

Page 1

THE UNIVERSITY OF Illinois launched its first Energy Farm tour/open house on its 320-acre research farm...................................3

FA R M E R S H AV E M O R E TO LOSE than gain under proposed cap-and-trade legislation, according to AFBF. .........................4

U.S. FARMERS are projected to har vest the largest soybean crop and second-largest corn crop on record. .....................................7

Monday, August 17, 2009

Two sections Volume 37, No. 33

House plan fueling a fiasco for farmers? BY MARTIN ROSS FarmWeek

House “climate” proposals would hit farmers especially hard in the wallet and the tank, a representative of one of the U.S.’ remaining ag fuel refiners warns. House greenhouse gas (GHG) cap-and-trade requirements likely would spur a hike in ag fuel prices beginning in 2014, according to Bob Looney, vice president for governmental affairs with CHS, a Minnesotabased, farmer-owned energy/grain company that co-owns a Kansas refinery with GROWMARK. The American Petroleum Institute (API) warns House GHG emissions caps would place “disproportionate costs on people who drive a car, truck, tractor, or take a flight.” API cites recent Heritage Foundation projections of a 55 percent increase in natural gas costs and a 58 percent boost in gasoline prices under House proposals. While utilities are wary of cap-and-trade’s impact on future electrical generation, Looney noted House legislation initially offers electricity providers a limited number of “free” greenhouse emissions

allowances that would help community- or state-controlled utilities avoid major consumer rate increases related to emissions limits. On the other hand, petroleum refiners would “bear the brunt of a much more onerous system,” he said. According to API, refiners would be held responsible for 44 percent of emissions, including both “smokestack” refinery emissions and emissions from the fuels they produce. House-proposed allowances would meet only about 7 percent of refiner compliance needs — Looney told FarmWeek fuel suppliers such as CHS would be forced to buy allowances that represent 93 percent of their excess GHG emissions. “With every gallon of offroad diesel we sell, we’re going to have to pass on the cost of those allowances,” Looney advised. “Given a real-world, $40-a-ton greenhouse gas allowance we’d have to buy, we’ve estimated we’d have to pass on anywhere between 38 and 50 cents a gallon (diesel/gasoline cost) to our farmers. That would have to take place immediately and would be for pretty much all refiners. “Farmers in the United States are served mostly by small refiners, and small refiners are going to have to incur quite

For more on climate policy, see page 4

a large cost every year to buy allowances and pass them on. “If they can’t pass them on, there’s a fear some of them would have to close. If you close a small refinery in a rural area, there aren’t too many others around and the supply-anddemand gets out of whack. That also exacerbates (farm) costs.” He sees additional cost increases for natural gas, propane, and petroleum-based feedstocks used in fertilizer production. At

the least, Looney hopes the Senate would provide financial assistance to help refiners “spread costs out and minimize how much we pass on to our farmers.” Lower bidders? Currently, 37 of 147 U.S. refiners are what Looney would call “small.” They lack the income from oil drilling that provides larger fuel marketers a source of revenue to buffer See Fiasco, page 7

RABBIT REPARTEE

Gary Mohr, Bloomington, left, president of the Illinois Rabbit Breeders Association, comments as he weighs entries in the Illinois State Fair junior rabbit competition. Looking on are Kirby Cowman (green shirt), 10, from Alexander in Morgan County; Carlee Critchelow (pink striped shirt), 11, from Chandlerville in Cass County; and Jazzmyn Whittier (white top), 13, from Downs in McLean County. To see the junior champions and reserve champions from the meat rabbit trio, poultry meat trio, meat goat trio, wether, barrow, and steer, go to {ILFB.org}, Ken Kashian’s photo galleries, 2009 Illinois State Fair. (Photo by Ken Kashian)

Periodicals: Time Valued

Illinois farmers face possibility of lower yields, prices BY DANIEL GRANT FarmWeek

The USDA August crop production report released last week generally projected higher corn and soybean yields compared to last year in states west of the Mississippi. In fact, current corn yield estimates would be a record in Iowa and Nebraska. However, it could be a different story in Illinois. Yields here were projected to average 175 bushels per acre for corn and 44 bushels per acre for soybeans, which would be a

decrease of 4 and 3 bushels per acre, respectively, compared to last year. “(Potential) yields on my farm are down from last year by probably 10 percent,” said Mark Elliott, a farmer from Fairbury in Livingston County who last week participated in Mark Elliott the Illinois Farm Bureau Marketers to

FarmWeek on the web: FarmWeekNow.com

Washington trip. Participants visited USDA to witness the release of the report. “It’s a long way to go until fall,” he said. Sixty-three percent of the Illinois corn crop and 60 percent of the soybean crop last week was rated good to excellent. But the maturity level of both crops last week remained behind as just 29 percent of the corn crop was in the dough stage compared to the average of 72 percent while 42 percent of soybeans were setting pods

compared to the average of 77 percent, according to the National Agricultural Statistics Service Illinois field office. “In our area I’d say 50 to 60 percent of the corn was planted after June 15,” said Ray Krausz, a Ray Krausz farmer from Mascoutah in St. Clair County, who didn’t get corn planted See Yields, page 2

Illinois Farm Bureau®on the web: www.ilfb.org


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.