Farmweek june 24 2013

Page 1

ILLINOIS FARM BUREAU has launched an updated brand and new tagline — “Farm. Family. Food.” to tell members and the public more about the organization. ........................2

A RESEARCHER TOLD those attending a Trees Forever meeting that scenes with trees and landscaping receive a higher rating than those without. .........3

ILLINOIS WHEAT harvest got off to a slow start last week, but the state’s farmers are projecte d t o h a r v e s t 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 a c r e s, 155,000 more than last year. .......4

A service of

®

House farm bill failure raises concerns about future Illinois Farm Bureau mission: Improve the economic well-being of agriculture and enrich the quality of farm family life.

Monday, June 24, 2013

BY MARTIN ROSS FarmWeek

Periodicals: Time Valued

A long-awaited House farm bill failed last week because of political lockdown largely over food stamp spending, leaving farm state lawmakers wondering how they might entice the 20-some votes reportedly needed for a second go. After days of haggling over a variety of proposed amendments, the House rejected 234-195, the proposed Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management (FARRM) Act. Taylorville Republican House Ag Committee member Rodney Davis said he was “completely upset and flabbergasted” by the vote. He labeled it “one more win for the polarization and politics of Washington.” The measure would have saved $40 billion over a 10-year period, but while some Republicans felt deeper cuts should be made, many Democrats balked at a proposed $2 billion in proposed annual Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP or food stamp) spending. The next step is to negotiate the terms necessary “to get the 20-something votes we need to pass it,” Illinois Farm Bureau National Legislative Director Adam Nielsen maintained. “I hope that at some point in time our legislators can get past the bickering and the partisanship and come to the table

Two sections Volume 41, No. 25

FarmWeekNow.com

Listen to Adam Nielsen’s comments about the House farm bill vote and what’s next at FarmWeekNow.com.

and find some agreement, some common ground,” IFB Vice President Rich Guebert Jr. said. Lawmakers ultimately focused on “the amendment process and individual priorities,” rather than “the overriding factor in this debate — whether we pass a bill,” Davis told FarmWeek, touting the

bill’s many “positive benefits.” “It’s unfortunate that we’ve worked so hard and come so far during the past two years to end up with this outcome,” IFB President Philip Nelson said. “We express hope that the inevitable political finger pointing will end quickly, and that both sides will work quickly — and in good faith — to bridge partisan and policy differences and pass a bill that will provide certainty for farmers, protect crop insurance and reduce the deficit.”

Davis admitted the agreement reached last week, which included a first-time cap on total annual farm payments even as it proposed to strengthen crop insurance protections, was not perfect. It nonetheless provided “a darn good starting point” for House-Senate conferees, he said. Davis said he hopes the bill’s defeat will not undo progress between U.S. House Speaker John Boehner (ROhio) and ag lawmakers.

Last year, Boehner resisted bringing the bill to the floor amid uncertain prospects for passage, but this time he “did what he said he was going to do and gave us an opportunity to have a debate on many different amendments,” he noted. “Many amendments that I don’t think were expected to pass were put into this legislation,” Davis said. “That open debate probably helped sink the bill. “Not that I want to limit

Food labeling concerns surface at legislative hearing See Farm bill page 2

BY KAY SHIPMAN FarmWeek

Consumers would face higher prices and fewer choices if Illinois requires a biotechnology label on some foods sold in the state, Illinois Senate subcommittee members heard last week. “Who bears the cost? Ultimately the consumer will bear the cost,” said Ron Moore, a Roseville farmer and Illinois Soybean Association director. Members of the Senate Subcommittee on Food Labeling heard testimony at the first of three scheduled hearings on a labeling proposal. Illinois Farm Bureau has been working with a coalition of agricultural organizations, business groups, and food manufacturing and marketing organizations to develop panels of experts to testify at the hearings. The coalition is working to show a united front on why labeling of foods containing ingredients from biotech crops is not in the best interest of Illinois farmers or the state’s food industry. “Putting safe and healthy food on dinner tables around the world is incredibly important to our members. After all, their families are eating those very same products,” said Heather Combs, IFB assistant director of state legislation.

Roseville farmer Ron Moore, seated at microphone, testifies before the Illinois Senate Subcommittee on Food Labeling during a hearing last week in Illinois State University’s Bone Student Center, Normal. An audience heard testimony about the potential impact of a proposal to require biotechnology labels on some foods sold in Illinois. (Photo by Kay Shipman)

Before the hearing, Subcommittee Chairman Sen. Dave Koehler (D-Peoria) told FarmWeek the senators would hear from “all sides.” Later in the fall, the senators will discuss “what we’re going to do,” Koehler said. Moore described how biotechnology helped him control weeds, use fewer pesticides, and improve yields. “I believe there are safeguards already in place to assure that GMO food is safe,” Moore told the senators. “If I didn’t believe this, I wouldn’t be pro-

FarmWeek on the web: FarmWeekNow.com

ducing them or feeding them to my own family and livestock.” Koehler commented, “I don’t know that it follows that labeling (food) means not safe.” “It ends up giving the impression that what I do is unsafe,” Moore said. “The consumer public will think that is not a good thing.” Spokesmen for Illinois manufacturers and retailers testified that companies that sell food in Illinois would be forced to have separate production lines and labels just for Illinois sales.

Some out-of-state companies may stop marketing in Illinois if forced to make a state-specific product, said Mark Denzler of the Illinois Manufacturer’s Association. “The issue is coming down to economics and marketing,” Koehler told the panel. “I am trying to create value” with this proposal. “Agriculture in Illinois is very diverse,” Moore responded. “We are not disparaging any type of production system or product. (But) I don’t want one system penalized.”

Illinois Farm Bureau®on the web: www.ilfb.org


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.