NASCAR LAST WEEK announced it had accumulated more than a million trouble-free miles of driving on E15 in 2011. ..2
A dAiRy PoLiCy refor m proposal has shifted from a mandatory to a voluntary stabilization program, but concerns remain. ............4
SuNNy WEAThER is expected as harvest moves into full swing, and chances for a killing frost are slim for the next 10 days. ................7
Monday, September 26, 2011
Two sections Volume 39, No. 39
IFB promotes ag policy plan
Obama targets direct payments, insurance funding
BY MARTIN ROSS FarmWeek
As Illinois Farm Bureau released a farm bill “prioritization list” emphasizing crop insurance needs, President Obama took aim at both direct payments and insurance funding many see as crucial in the face of anticipated farm program reductions. Last week, the IFB Board of Directors signed off on IFB Farm Policy Task Force (FPTF) recommendations that include proposals to bolster federal crop premium subsidies and institute insurance reforms that would better reflect trendline yields and offer “loss ratio fairness” across various insured crops. The IFB plan also favors authorizing USDA’s Risk Management Agency (RMA) to develop new insurance-based programs such as farmer “savings accounts.” IFB action came on the heels of a White House deficit reduction plan that would eliminate direct payments in order to achieve a purported $3 billion per
year in federal savings over the next decade. Taxpayers “continue to foot the bill for these payments to farmers who are experiencing record yields and prices,” the administration argued.
FarmWeekNow.com Listen to IFB President Philip Nelson’s comments on farm policy recommendations at FarmWeekNow.com.
The White House submitted proposals for review by a 12member congressional “super committee” charged with identifying $1.5 trillion in federal savings by Thanksgiving. Obama proposes $3.7 billion in 10year savings by trimming federal reimbursements for crop insurers and shaving 2 percent from premium subsidies that today exceed 60 percent. Instead, the administration proposes to extend the nowexpired 2008 farm bill Supplemental Revenue standing disaster program or similar aid through 2016 (see page 4). However, the plan would require producers to purchase crop insurance to be eligible for emergency assistance.
Crop insurers took a $6 billion federal hit last year, and IFB President Philip Nelson warned continued “peeling back” could hinder existing insurance “delivery mechanisms” and future risk product development and further reduce the number of companies willing to offer risk protection. “Given the volatility we’re seeing in the marketplace, this is one area where producers feel they can try to at least take out some of their risk by buying up (subsidized) coverage in crop insurance,” Nelson said. “I think (the Obama plan) will take a definite toll on some of these new products (RMA) is looking at, particularly if there are not funds to roll these products out.” Amid heightened super committee pressures, Nelson sees the timeline for development of the next farm bill being “condensed dramatically.” House and Senate ag committees reportedly could put forward an ag policy draft yet this fall. Obama’s plan “sends a strong signal that direct pay-
Periodicals: Time Valued
U OF I GRADS, PRESIDENT
Illinois Farm Bureau Directors Chris Hausman, left, and Dale Hadden, center, both University of Illinois graduates, chatted with U of I President Michael Hogan last week after Hogan spoke with the IFB board. He addressed the university’s South Farms status and gave an overall update on the university. (Photo by Ken Kashian)
FarmWeek on the web: FarmWeekNow.com
ments probably are in jeopardy,” he conceded. In light of that growing threat, IFB and other groups have redoubled efforts to protect crop insurance and bolster revenue protections such as current Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) program. The FPTF plan supports
efforts to improve and simplify ACRE in order to provide more timely producer payments based on regional rather than state revenue benchmarks and loss triggers and protect growers from “price volatility.” See Policy, page 3
The secretary explains Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack reviewed administration budget-policy proposals with FarmWeek and RFD Radio last week. What would President Obama’s proposed American Jobs Act do to revive the rural economy? Vilsack: It offers an opportunity to help small businesses hire more people by providing tax relief. It helps families by extending the payroll tax holiday that started last December. That will put roughly $1,500 in the pockets of Tom Vilsack Illinois families that they can spend next year. It also helps small businesses and farmers with a 100 percent expensing option. That means any farm implement purchased or any piece of equipment a business purchases doesn’t have to be depreciated over a period of years — the entire purchase price can be written off in the year of sale. The president’s deficit reduction plan would eliminate direct payments and reduce crop insurance funding. How would the administration address farm safety net needs? Vilsack: Come Oct. 1, disaster programs under the farm bill go out of business because they were not adequately and fully funded by Congress in 2008. The president’s called for extension of those disaster programs, which are an incredibly important part of the safety net we have for producers who’ve been impacted negatively by floods or drought or tornadoes or hurricanes — all of which we’ve seen this year. The president’s suggested that as a way of paying for extension of disaster programs, we ask crop insurance companies to give just a bit more than they’ve given. Right now, companies on average are set to get a 14 percent return on investment — they’ll be able to generate income levels of 14 percent, sufficient to pay off any claims. We’ve calculated that about 12 percent is really what’s necessary for the industry to remain viable. The president’s proposing to bring (returns) down from 14 percent to 12 percent. What about producer price and market risks? Vilsack: I think there’s an appreciation by virtually everyone that the direct payment system isn’t going to work in the future, given the current situation of relatively strong prices combined with the need to get our fiscal house in order. Having said that, there’s a recognition that a proper, strong safety net addresses not just loss of income as a result of natural disasters but also precipitous drops in market prices, which also can be devastating. That’s why you have programs like ACRE (Average Crop Revenue Election). We’re providing technical assistance to House and Senate folks working on farm bill discussions, in terms of trying to figure out the right (program) combination. Do we do this based on a statewide (yield) basis, which has raised some concerns? Is a countywide or individual farmstead basis a more appropriate vehicle? There are ways in which we can look at improving ACRE to the point where it becomes a far more acceptable tool than it has been in the past.
Illinois Farm Bureau®on the web: www.ilfb.org