MBC130620

Page 1

LOG ON TO CROP CHATTER Crop-management forum for Manitoba » Page 17

SAVE IT FOR LATER Pilot project stores drainage water » Page 3

JUNE 20, 2013

SERVING MANITOBA FARMERS SINCE 1925 | VOL. 71, NO. 25

|

MANITOBACOOPERATOR.CA

$1.75

Milking the benefits of canola meal The results will boost demand for Canadian canola, says the Canola Council of Canada By Allan Dawson CO-OPERATOR STAFF

T

he Chinese have 7.2 million reasons to switch their dairy cows to canola meal from other protein rations. That’s how many more litres of milk their 12 million cows would produce every day based on a year-long joint Sino-Canadian study conducted by Chinese academics, in co-operation with China’s five largest dairy companies. “Canola meal has now proven its value as a feed product in Chinese dairies, opening the door for China’s milk industry to enhance quality and increase production without significantly increasing cost,” Canola Council of Canada president Patti Miller said in a news release from Beijing June 14. The results are timely given the growing demand for dairy products in the world’s most populated country and concerns about milk quality. The study, which compared Canadian canola meal against the dairies’ usual protein rations of either soymeal or cottonseed meal, showed the cows fed canola meal produced, on average, 0.6 more litres of milk per cow, per day, Bruce Jowett, the canSee CANOLA on page 6 »

What was once pasture for cattle is now home to a flock of pelicans at East Shoal Lake.

SHOAL LAKE:

Flooded landowners slam province’s buyout tactics Shoal Lakes farmers say they weren’t allowed to examine or make a copy of their assessment and pressured to take it or leave it By Shannon VanRaes CO-OPERATOR STAFF

T Publication Mail Agreement 40069240

PHOTO: SHANNON VANRAES

he paperwork is spread across the kitchen of the new home Brian McCulley purchased after flooding forced him off his land near the shore of West Shoal Lake — including a scorned buyout offer from the province. “It wasn’t fair market value and I didn’t consider what was on that piece of paper to be an offer at all,” said the retired rancher. “It was insulting.” The offer violated the terms of the Shoal Lakes Agricultural Flooding Assistance Program because it wasn’t

based on the fair market value of his property, said McCulley. Instead officials used Farm Use Assessment value, which has traditionally been used when assessing taxes on farmed land located close to urban centres, he said. The property assessment he received from the GO office in Teulon during buyout negotiations shows there were two assessments done — one at market value and one using the much lower farm-use value. Offering the lower value showed “they just had no respect for us,” McCulley said. It took months before he finally received an offer that reflected the

market value of his property and what he said was an apology from an official with Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. He accepted both, but said he wonders how many other Shoal Lake producers were treated the way he was. Orval Proctor is wondering as well. The cow-calf operator said he believes he was also offered the farmuse value for his land instead of market value, but is having difficulty proving that because he wasn’t provided with a copy of his assessment. “He pushed it across in front of See SHOAL LAKE on page 6 »

CFIA BUMPS UP RULES FOR TRACEABILITY » PAGE 16


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.