Federation Villages - Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan

Page 83

Federation Villages Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan

Discussion of Results

D

R

AF

T

FO

R

PU

BL

IC

Response Modification Measures and Property Modification Measures tend to score more highly than Flood Modification measures, as they can be implemented for a relatively low cost, lead to the reduction of property damage and improvement in community resilience in the long term, and do not incur negative environmental impacts; Majority of flood modification measures, that is, structural options, do not score well in terms of economic merits. Reasons for this include: o “Tangible Benefits” included in the Cost Benefit Analysis are determined from the reduction in property damages (Annual Average Damages (AAD), Section 5.5). o In the same vein, to reduce property damages, structural options need to effectively reduce flood risk in rare events. To do this, structural options need to be substantial in size, i.e. levee height or basin storage capacity – leading to high capital costs, land purchase requirements, and ongoing maintenance costs. The lowest scoring option Aquatic Centre Dam Outlet Upgrade (FMU-07), which involve replacement of the Aquatic Centre Dam Outlet involves substantial capital works for very little benefit in terms of flood risk reduction. Other lower scoring options are drainage focused options and therefore do not have significant benefits in larger flood event.

EX

H IB IT IO

N

The multi-criteria matrix assessment results, presented in Table 29, can be used to both understand the benefits and disadvantages of individual options, but to also see trends across the full suite of options assessed in the FRMS&P. The following results and trends are noted: • Managing Development in the Flood Prone Areas (PM-06/07) and Voluntary Purchase (PM-05) received the highest score, as they deliver benefits across a range of criteria including economics, reduction in flood risk, property affectation, as well as playing a small role in community flood awareness; • Flood Planning Level (PM-01), Flood Planning Area (PM-02), and Community Education and Awareness (RM-02) are the next highest scoring as they are effective methods to reduce property damages in the study area, and have additional benefits relating to improvements to community flood awareness.

118048: R211211_FederationVillagesFRMSP.docx: 11 December 2021

72


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

10. REFERENCES

14min
pages 92-121

9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

0
page 91

Table 30: Floodplain Risk Management Plan

17min
pages 85-90

Discussion of Results

1min
page 83

8. DRAFT FLOODPLAIN RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

0
page 84

6.5.3. Improvements to Driver Safety

5min
pages 75-77

Table 28 Multicriteria Matrix Assessment – Scoring System

4min
page 81

6.5.2. Community Flood Awareness and Education

6min
pages 71-74

6.4.7. Section 10.7 Planning Certificates

4min
pages 68-69

6.4.6. Planning Controls to Managing Future Development

2min
page 67

Table 25: Summary of Freeboard Asessment

4min
pages 62-63

6.4.3. Voluntary House Raising

1min
page 65

6.4.2. Flood Planning Area

2min
page 64

Table 24: Likelihood of given design events occurring in a period of 70 years

6min
pages 59-61

Flood Modification Measures

2min
page 56

4.2.2. NSW Flood Prone Land Policy

1min
page 29

1.2.2. Floodplain Risk Management Draft Plan Objectives

1min
page 14

5.6.3. First Event Flooded

2min
pages 53-54

Assessment Methodology

1min
page 44

4.3.2. Development Control Plan

4min
pages 41-42

4.2.4. Section 10.7 Planning Certificates

4min
pages 33-34

4.2.3. Flood Prone Land Package

5min
pages 30-32

Engagement with Local Primary Schools

2min
page 25
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.