Advocate News • City Insider: Town & Country April 2019

Page 1

SPACES LIMITED! ENROLL TODAY!

FAMILY-OWNED CHILDCARE CENTERS | SERVING AGES 0 TO 12 YEARS CONSTRUCTIVE LEARNING AHEAD

KIDS’ ZONE

CHILDREN ARE A GIFT FROM GOD

Learning Center

~ psalm 127:3

105 Western Sky Trail Jarrell 512-598-3900

104 Copper Lane Jarrell 512-746-2333

4802 Moreland Drive Georgetown 512-868-8300

PRSRT STD ECRWSS U.S. POSTAGE PAID EDDM RETAIL

3 CONVENIENT LOCATIONS!

Caring for Ages 0-12 Years Full-Time Childcare After-School Care Private Kindergarten & 1st Grade*

*****************ECRWSS****

Local Postal Customer

*available at select locations

PRSRT STD ECRWSS U.S. POSTAGE PAID EDDM RETAIL

*****************ECRWSS****

Local Postal Customer

TOWN & COUNTRY

See The Advocate's Endorsements for Georgetown City Council & GISD Board of Trustees - Page 7 APRIL 2019

When you want the REAL story!

WilCo a Hard 'No' on Water District

by Ann Marie Ludlow

S

ince 1949, Texas has been engaged in deliberate and legislative management of water-related needs across the state. Bills have been regularly introduced since that time, regardless of drought conditions, to operate the Texas Water Development Board and fund our supply and conservation needs through local Water Conservation Districts (WCDs). There were no fewer than 110 water-related bills filed in the 2019 session alone. Conflict arises, as it often

does in Texas, when the government attempts to augment its ability to appropriate funding, through tax dollars, for programs upon which municipalities and landowners disagree. One such landowner is Jim Schwertner, whose family has been in agriculture since founding the town that bears his name more than 100 years ago. Schwertner owns and manages 23,000 acres of farm and grazing land in Bell, Williamson, Travis, Bastrop, and Caldwell counties and he is one of the largest

Gonzalez: Experience-Based Solutions Georgetown Councilman Tom-

my Gonzalez learned about problem solving from his father. “My father always said, ‘If there’s a problem, tell me what the solution is going to be,’” explains Gonzalez; and decades later, he still lives his life by this principle. From a young age, Mr. Gonzalez knew he wanted to serve his community. Shortly after moving to Georgetown, he became a member of the Historical Architectural Review Committee (HARC), and it was then he realized, “While I knew I didn’t have all the answers, I knew a bunch of the wrong ones.” So, he threw his hat in the ring for City Council. Nine years later, Gonzalez feels he has gained the wisdom and maturity to have an extensive overall knowledge of city operations.

District 7 Council Member Tommy Gonzalez with GISD Trustees Andy Webb and Scott Stribling

“Throughout your first term, you learn a lot,” says Gonzalez. “Coming from the corporate world, it’s hard to understand how a city operates. When you’re first elected, it takes about a year to understand the reports and conclusions of staff. You learn how to make the most intelligent decision based on the information you’re provided.” As for his second term, “I spent

Continued Page 2

much of it working to land HEB. Now they have purchased land on the southeast side of Georgetown.” And of his most recent term, Gonzalez points to the multiple awards Georgetown has received, from the library to the finance department. He is also proud of the abundance of new job opportunities from major employers, including Holt Caterpillar. Describing a future that has Gonzalez continuing to represent Georgetown’s District 7, he says, “I’ll work hard to keep Georgetown as one of the safest cities in the state of Texas and keep taxes on residents low. I’ll also concentrate on the unique charm that makes Georgetown what it is, even while it is continuing to grow. Finally, I work for the citizens of Georgetown, and, as always, I’ll take my cues from them!”

Georgetown Electric Fund — By the Numbers

by Kevin Pitts City Council District 5

T

he City of Georgetown Electric Fund has been a topic of discussion in the news, social media, and among residents. The information floating around has created confusion among many. I was one of those, and was under the impression that our electric utility had lost anywhere from $6-$26 million, as reported by multiple sources. I am a commercial banker and review financial statements on a daily basis. Being on council since May 2018, I did not have historical knowledge of the electric utility performance. I asked

city staff to provide me with the approved budget and the year-end actual fund schedules (or financial statements) from 2014-18. I wanted to review the numbers for myself, without any outside influence. My goal was to try and answer three questions: • What happened? • Why did it happen? • How can council set policy to ensure it does not happen again? When reviewing the fund schedules one must first understand how to read them. The way I view a fund schedule is by breaking it into two sections. The first section is a traditional—revenues minus expenses—statement. The second section is similar to a statement of cash flow that reflects sources and uses of funds. Sources of funds are operating profits and bond proceeds. Uses are operating losses and Non-Operating Expenses (Capital Improvements, Debt Payments, and Debt Issuance Costs).

MAVERICK TERMITE & PEST CONTROL Serving Georgetown & Surrounding Areas Since 1996

512.746.4111 TDA # 0569150

mavericktermiteandpest.com

Figures 1 and 2 show fund schedules that were budgeted and what was actually booked at fiscal year-end. Three observations in regard to the actual fiscal year end numbers: • Our fund balance started at almost $12M in 2014, and was just below $2M at year-end 2018. • The electric fund had an operating profit (added for my analysis) in 2014-17 and a $3.2M operating loss in 2018. The fund had not lost money outside of 2018 as was my previous impression. • The Purchased Power* line item increased substantially from 2016-18.

What happened

Based on my analysis of actual numbers, the electric fund brought in $15M in operating profit from 2014-18. However, our fund balance decreased by roughly $10M. As mentioned above, operating profit is a source of cash to our electric fund. So

what happened to the fund balance? Figure 3 tracks the fund balance to locate the use of the funds. I made another chart to determine the difference in bond proceeds, which are used for capital improvements, versus the amount of capital improvement. As stated previously, capital improvements are one of three line items that make up the Non-Operational Expenses. Based on data in Figure 4 the primary reason our fund schedule was reduced by roughly $10M was to cashfund our capital improvements. I observed what appears to be a change in strategy starting in 2017, which also coincides with a change in leadership in our finance department. I wanted to understand why we chose to cash fund approximately 30% of our capital improvements, instead of funding the entire amount from bond proceeds. Figs. 5 and 6 helped me

locate a reason for the cash funding. Those final two charts show that if the approved budget would have been achieved over a five-year period, we would have produced $22.7M more in cash than we actually did. Therefore, I would assume that the decision makers at the time made the assumption that the electric fund would be replenishing its cash at a much higher rate than what actually occurred. The largest deviation was in the purchase power cost line item. Our forecasting appears to have been very poor. So... What happened? The city electric fund was reduced by roughly $10M from 20142018. Why did it happen? It appears we cash-funded our capital improvements at too high a rate because we assumed our operations would be a source of $37.8M in cash rather than the $15.1M actually generated. The pri-

mary cause for missing the projected operating performance was poor forecasting of our purchase power costs. How can council set policy to ensure it does not happen again? My fellow council members and I will continue working this question. However, the city currently has two requests for proposals outstanding. One seeks an outside firm to manage our electric portfolio and should help our forecasting of purchase power cost. The other is for an outside firm to assess our management within the electric utility and should help with forecasting and overall management. *The Purchased Power line item is a net number that represents the total cost to purchase power less the sale of the excess power not used by the City of Georgetown. See Page 3 for charts and figures.

CHECK OUT OUR BUNS! 3900 FM 972 • Walburg • 512.819.9175

NEW AT DALE’S FRESH-BAKED HAMBURGER BUNS! www.Dales-Essenhaus.com

ADVOCATE GEORGETOWN

RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING SPECIALISTS!

Repairs • Replacements New Construction • Water Softeners

(512) 746-2415

www.kendixonplumbing.com

M-5647

@ADVOCATE_TX

FIDELIS MEDIA


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Advocate News • City Insider: Town & Country April 2019 by Fidelis Publishing Group, LLC - Issuu