NEWS HOUR 19th Nov– 26
Weekly News Magazine
th
Nov 2017
PRESIDENT’S NOD TO MORE STRINGENT INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE (IBC) Report by - Pavan Kumar
Wilful defaulters prohibited from being resolution applicants
President signed the ordinance which prohibits wilful defaulters and the habitually non-compliant from being the ‘resolution applicant’ in non-performing assets (NPAs) resolution process. The violators of norms, now, can be penalized from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.2 crores. In a statement, Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) said, “The ordinance comes as a blow to defaulting promoters seeking to reclaim their firms that are under insolvency proceedings, and aims at putting in place safeguards to prevent unscrupulous persons from misusing or vitiating the provisions of the IBC.” An applicant is considered ineligible if he is a wilful defaulter, whose account is classified as NPAs for one or more years and has not settled interest payments. Second, a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee in favour of a creditor, in respect of a corporate debtor undergoing resolution process. Last, promoters or in the management of authority of corporate debtor during the execution of the resolution plan, holding company, the subsidiary company, associate company or related party. Also, the feasibility and viability of the resolution plan before approving is ensured by the Committee of Creditors (CoC). Moreover, additional powers are given to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) to check on the predecessor of the applicant submitting the resolution plan for the preferential, undervalued or fraudulent transactions. The new amendment directs the CoC to reject the applications and calls for a fresh ploy of resolution where the applicant is not eligible as per the revised norms and offered application before the commencement of the Ordinance. Challenges The amendment gives an unintended advantage to foreign bidders as the concept of wilful defaulters does not exist in most of the countries. Since the disqualification criteria for foreign institutional investors (FII) is unknown, it might be even lighter. Secondly, identification of wilful defaulter is in itself a challenge. Though the basis maybe on guidelines of RBI, the promoter can challenge such determination and might stay the insolvency proceedings until it is decided. Hence, it defies the objective of IBC, i.e., fast resolution of cases.
In This Issue
President’s nod to more stringent Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
S&P maintains India’s sovereign rating at BBB-
India set to join EBRD