PILA Bulletin, 3 December 2009 This Bulletin on Public Interest Law is issued by the Public Interest Law Alliance, a project of FLAC. A new and comprehensive PILA website will be online in the coming months, until then you can find further information about the project at www.pila.ie. For now, the archive of PILA and PILN bulletins can be found at www.flac.ie/publications. If you wish to have an item included please contact bulletin@pila.ie. Please feel free to distribute the bulletin as widely as you wish. If you would like to suggest a friend for our PILA Bulletin mailing list, please forward their contact details to us at the same address. *********************************************************** In this Bulletin: 1. High Court gives judgement in asylum test case; 2. Cuts in human rights budgets harm Ireland’s image; 3. FLAC’s Third Annual Dave Ellis Memorial Lecture; 4. UK: English Bar Standards Board permits joint practices of solicitors and barristers in limited circumstances; 5. UK: Evidence of UK complicity in torture; 6. Switzerland ban construction of minarets on Mosques; 7. Public Interest Litigation: Australian Court delivers Landmark decision on Protective Costs Orders; 8. Two papers attached; 9. Amnesty International invites written submissions from organisations involved in health and housing, deadline 14 December 2009; 10. Community Legal Education: Housing law and policy course, Ballymun Community Law Centre in association with NUIG School of Law; 11. Events: Immigrant Council of Ireland information session for organisations working with migrants, Athlone, 8 December 2009; 12. Law Reform Commission to launch its report on Defences in Criminal Law, 14 December 2009.
1.
High Court gives judgement in asylum test case
An Irishman and his Chinese-born wife have been refused permission to judicially review the State's refusal to allow the woman's widowed mother to live with them in the State. The case brought by the couple, who are both Irish citizens, was seen as a test case as it determined the rights of Irish citizens to have their non-EU dependent relatives live with them in the State. The High Court found that the couple had failed to make out the "substantial" grounds necessary under law in asylum and immigration proceedings before judicial review proceedings may be brought. The Court was of the opinion that, amongst other things, the