Vol. 22Vol. No.23 1 Fall No. 2015 1
Cover: Amy Cragg and Shalane Flanagan, U.S. Olympic Trials Marathon
INSIDE • Desi Linden Punches Her Ticket • Track Spikes Shoe Review • Olympic Trials Marathon Features • 2016 Spring Shoe Review • USATF Indoor Features • IAAF World Indoor Championships Top-10 Moments • USATF Relays Coach Controversy Visit us on Facebook at American Track & Field or at www.american-trackandfield.com/atf/
4 6 8 10 18 19 23
PhotoRun.net
PUBLISHER’S NOTE Dear Readers, We started American Track & Field in 1994. It was preceded for five years by American Athletics. Four times a year, we celebrated all that was our sport, with articles on coaching, events, and the characters who make our sport what it is. We’re bringing American Track & Field back from a short hiatus, as I sorted out our publishing responsibilities and worked on planning out how we would evolve our publications. This is American Track & Field Spring 2016. It will be a quarterly publication, created to support our sport and celebrate the important things, from the athletes, events, and communities that make up the sport, to the technical, plus video and photos capturing the sport. Let us know what you think! Always feel free to send me your thoughts at fortiusmedia@gmail.com. Happy 2016!
Alex Larsen
Larry
Vol. 23 No. 1 American Track & Field is custom published by FORTIUS Media Group, LLC. All rights and copyrights reside with FORTIUS Media Group, LLC. Publishing Director: Larry Eder. Design: Alex Larsen, acl3graphics@gmail.com. Proofreading: Marg Sumner, MargSumner@aol.com. Senior Writers: Cait Chock, Larry Eder, Carolyn Mather, Dave Hunter, Cregg Weinmann. Editor Emeritus: James Dunaway. Media Sales: Adam Lawrence Johnson-Eder, 608.556.9164, adamlawrenceeder@gmail.com and Larry Eder, 608.239.3785, fortiusmedia@gmail.com. Counsel: Perry F. Goldlust, Esq. FORTIUS Media Group, LLC, PO Box 6450, San Jose, CA 95150. As with all fitness activities, FORTIUS Media Group, LLC suggests that before changing your current program, you consult your family physician. American Track & Field (ISSN 1098-64640) is produced, custom published, and owned by FORTIUS Media Group, LLC, PO Box 6450, San Jose, CA 95150. Publisher assumes no liability for matter printed. Publisher assumes no liability or responsibility for content of paid advertising and reserves the right to reject paid advertising. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Publisher. © Copyright 2016 by FORTIUS Media Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or stored in any form without written permission of the Publisher. American Track & Field is not related to or endorsed by any other entity or corporation with a similar name and is solely owned by FORTIUS Media Group, LLC.
PhotoRun.net
DESI LINDEN PUNCHES HER TICKET TO RIO; IT WAS
“FREAKIN’ FUN�
On a day that humbled most of those running the 2016 U.S. Olympic Marathon Trials, Desi Linden gutted out the hardest 26.2 miles of her life. It was worth it. Crossing the line in second place, the Hansons Brooks runner effectively punched her ticket to Rio. Joining winner Amy Cragg and thirdplace runner Shalane Flanagan, Linden took a quick celebratory break in Bali and is now back at work. I caught up with this member of Team Hansons Brooks to find out what mental tricks she relied on to power through brutal conditions, cramping, and being stuck in the dreaded “noman’s land� for a large part of the race.
4
American Track & Field
ATF: First of all, congrats! The heat made for a brutal race for many out there, and you’ve said that was also the hardest 26.2 miles of your life. Did you feel sort of at from the gun, or when did you start to realize this was going to be a gruel fest? DESI LINDEN: I knew the conditions were going to set us up for a tough day, thus, the more conservative race plan. Even knowing that going in, it was still incredibly difficult and challenging out there. The long unshaded stretch on Figueroa just felt like an eternity and only got “longerâ€? [with] each lap. Heading into the final loop was probably the worst. I was getting pangs of pain, bordering [on] cramping in my quads, hamstrings, and calves, but
ATF: Obviously the Olympics were at stake—motivation enough. But what were some of the things you focused on mentally to gut it out? You ran alone for the most part. DESI: I’m a big believer in writing out a race plan. It basically serves as the to-do list for the day. It’s a great way to keep the mind focused on the next task and not let it wander to questions and doubts that don’t help you reach your goal. During the race I just stayed focused on the plan and getting each task done throughout the different stages of the race. ATF: What were you thinking when you started catching up to and then passing Shalane? DESI: Coming out of USC I figured my place was pretty set, and all I needed to do was maintain to the finish so I kind of settled in. Midway through the stretch I could see the bikes getting closer and actually caught a glimpse of Amy looking back. It still seemed like a reach to be able to pick up one more place, but it was a nice change in my mentality. Instead of hanging on to my spot, I had a new objective to shoot for, which allowed me to
DESI: It was a pretty typical marathon build-up. The biggest difference was spending the last 5–6 weeks of our segment in Florida. It was great to go down there as a group and really feel like we were in a training camp. It eliminated all the distractions of home and gave the feel of having that really important race on the horizon. I liked that focused approach and sense of importance and purpose. ATF: Now that you’ve punched your ticket, what are you going to be doing between now and the Olympics? DESI: I’ll squeeze in a brief segment of shorter/quicker work and hopefully get in a few fun races on the roads. After that I’ll switch back to marathon training mode: high mileage, longer workouts, no races—I think they call it the “unsexy stuff.” ATF: And of course, the big day. What do you feel you’re capable of and what are your goals going into the Olympics? DESI: I think we have a great team, and all three of us will be thinking about the podium. I felt I was 95% fit going into the Trials. If I can stay healthy and build on that, I think I’ll be in [a] great position to be the fittest I’ve ever been heading into the Games. We’ll see where that lands me. ATF: Thank you very much for your time, Desi. We’ll all be cheering for you in Rio! American Track & Field
DESI: The heat was certainly a factor, but I’ve been using the same PowerGel fueling plan for some time now and thought it worked well in the conditions. It may sound strange, but I find that a flat course is a bit more challenging for me than a rolling or hilly course. On a rolling course you’re working different muscle groups and get a bit of relief, depending on the ups and downs. Not the case on that LA course! We’ll get a good idea of what the Rio course is going to be and make sure we replicate it in practice. If it’s another flat course, I think we’ll try and get more of my longer runs and longer workouts on a similar-type course just to really prep my body.
ATF: Backing up a bit, can you tell us a little about the build-up for the Trials. Any surprises or things you did differently this training cycle?
5
ATF: Do you attribute it mostly to the heat? Are you going to be making any adjustments to your fluids/fuel strategy going into Rio?
pick my pace up and break down the race into another segment. After I passed Shalane, I knew the work was done for the day and I was going to make the team, so I was able to soak in the excitement and really celebrate and enjoy the moment, which was pretty freakin’ fun.
PhotoRun.net
knew it was the critical moment of the race. Heading out from USC and looking up at that long stretch was probably more mentally taxing than anything.
wins the Olympic Trials DesI Linden takes second; Shalane
In the second of two Olympic Trials contested today, the women’s race presented the most drama. 2012 fourth-placer Amy Cragg not only made the team, but moved up to the win. “I had spent four years training to improve one place,” noted Cragg after her hardwon victory. She improved three places!
And Desi Linden, who, like Cragg, spent four years building to this day, took second, in a race that had her as much as a minute+ down at just past halfway. Desi noted that the race was “grueling.”
Defending champion Shalane Flanagan, who was about four weeks short on her training, had to battle not only the field, but heat issues, and went from looking like the unbeatable winner to holding on for third and requiring an IV, her first after a marathon, to recover. “That was the hardest marathon that I have run over the last six miles,” noted Flanagan.
Here’s how I saw the race ...
A field of 198 women started the race. 139 finished.
8
American Track & Field
PhotoRun.net
Flanagan holds on FOR third
photorun.net
American Track & Field 9
with Flanagan for the past four months, didn't want to leave her training partner. As the lead dropped from over a minute to just over 32 seconds at mile 24, Cragg took over, reluctantly. “I knew Shalane was having trouble. At [the] mile 24 water stop, I had Shalane drop a whole bottle of water over her head.” And then, Cragg took off. Amy Cragg took off at the perfect time to take the win. She used that top end 10,000-meter speed to cement the win in 2:28:20, three positions up from her fourth place in 2012. Cragg waited for Linden, who passed Flanagan just before 25 miles and went on to take second in 2:28:54. And in third, Shalane Flanagan, who just barely held on—and did so with pure guts—ran 2:29.19. In fourth, just over a minute behind, Kara Goucher, who had run herself into contention once again, ran 2:30:24 in these hot and humid conditions. Goucher gave it all she had, and that’s the most honorable result an athlete can achieve. Janet Bawcom took fifth in 2:31:14, with Taylor in sixth in 2:32:50. In the top five, remarkably, the only thing that changed since 2012 was the positions. Amy Cragg was most improved. When I asked Cragg afterward how she was feeling, there was much emotion. Her level of fitness is much higher than at any time before, but most important, her level of confidence has increased tenfold. From mile 21 on, Cragg could have won the race and run away by herself, winning two minutes faster. She didn’t. Instead, she showed concern for her training partner, reluctantly leaving her with less than two miles to the finish line. Her finish was strong, and her victory was exciting. The team of Amy Cragg, Desi Linden, and Shalane Flanagan is strong for us. Each marathoner of the trio has strengths and the ability to battle into top-10 positions in Rio. And miles to go over the next 25 weeks.
PhotoRun.net
Training partners have a relationship that’s hard to explain. This past December I attended the RnR San Antonio to report on the women’s half marathon. Kara Goucher won the race, with Shalane Flanagan and Amy Cragg taking third and fourth, respectively. After the half marathon, Flanagan and Cragg ran eight more miles with coach Jerry Schumacher, making it a nice long day. What I didn’t know at that time was that Flanagan was only in her second week of training after an end-ofseason/beginning-of-season injury. This would play a major role in the Olympic Trials race. Trials day, Feb. 13, was a good day for sports viewing, but a hard day for racing marathons. The overwhelming comments from our team on the course were how hot it was, how there was no shade, how classy Amy Cragg was in caring for her ailing teammate, and then, with the finish nearly in sight, kicking to the finish. 198 women started the race today. 139 finished. The pace, conservative for the conditions, started out through 10 miles at a 2:33 pace. But even with that, the contenders and pretenders were separated pretty quickly. Kellyn Taylor, who had debuted at the 2015 Houston marathon in 2:28:20, was up near the front in the early miles, and it was Taylor who broke open the race after only seven miles. Sara Hall, Amy Cragg, and Shalane Flanagan followed. At nine miles Cragg and Flanagan took over, building up 10 seconds by 12 miles, and the race was on. From miles 12 to 21, Cragg and Flanagan led, and the race looked like it was in the bag. What was strange was the distance (just over a minute) that Desi Linden had allowed to grow between the lead pack and her. Kara Goucher seemed to be struggling. But Linden started to move, with Goucher in tow. Linden, then Goucher went by Taylor, whose early miles and breaking up of the field cost her dearly. As Linden and Goucher battled for third, Flanagan was having trouble with the heat. Cragg, who had been training
presents
2016
SPRING
NEUTRAL—3 MOTION STABILIZING—4 PERFORMANCE—5
SHOE REVIEW
Finding the best shoe for you has traditionally begun by assessing the characteristics of your feet and gait, and then matching them with the features and properties of a particular shoe. If you had a neutral gait, then your need for specialized shoes was reduced. However, if you rolled to the inside of your foot, called overpronation, the thinking was that you required a more heavily supported shoe. This approach was based on the science and construction-based solutions of 30 years ago. The notion of overpronation, and the thinking behind it, continued until recently. The (oversimplified) idea was that overpronation was bad and required a design solution to “correct” it. Runners who overpronated risked injury if they didn’t run in shoes that employed a structure to correct the excessive motion. The recent minimalist movement (think: unstructured shoes, thinner/minimal midsoles, zero-drop shoes, etc.) set in motion an exploration and rethinking of these longheld tenets. Yes, the use of geometry and lighter materials have improved running shoes and their performance. But more importantly, this has resulted in a paradigm shift toward the understanding that running shoes by themselves don’t prevent overuse injuries because they can’t control overpronation. This doesn’t mean the accepted stabilizing technologies are unnecessary. They actually help resist the premature breakdown of the shoe’s structure and performance, playing a key role in the comfort of both your runs and your wallet. They just can’t stop the motion that your feet are inclined to take. The motion of general foot types is best served, first by certain footwear properties, components, and designs, and, second by an individual runner’s preferences for fit and feel. Of the two, fit and feel trump properties, components, and designs. All feet pronate and some, depending on their movement patterns, pronate more than others. That’s why what we suggest is a starting point within the categories of running footwear styles, but it’s only a starting point. Runners are very fond of their go-to shoes, and a large percentage of runners have been guided toward a particular shoe at the suggestion of a running specialty store. That suggestion starts the learning process for what works for the runners. With all the services your local running specialty store provides, it’s a great place to start your search. — Cregg Weinmann, Running Shoe Reviewer for the Running Network, LLC
FORTIUS Media Group, LLC Partners
2016 Spring Shoe Review Since I ran in my first sneakers 44 years ago, the technology has changed. More brands mean better products and safer, more enjoyable running and racing. My first real running shoes, Onitsuka Tiger Cortez, were followed by adidas Interval track spikes. My brightly colored Nike waffle racers in 1975 were a revelation. Then I broke 5:00 for the mile in Brooks’ Villanova spikes. My first hour-run champs and 10,000m on the track were contested in Nike Pre Montreals. My 1976 Christmas Relays’ leg of 10.6 miles was run in New Balance racing flats. In 1978 I learned about Mizuno and ran in them for a while. In the last couple of years as I built back up to two hours of near-daily walking, I’ve been in HOKA ONE ONE Stinsons, adidas Boost, and Brooks Beast. My first try in Skechers Go Walks were amazing—lighter than ever, yet great for my back! I’m sure that you’ve got your own “scrapbooks” of shoe memories. We hope you’ll read our reviews, then visit your local running store and find the best shoes for your needs.
Larry Eder Publishing Director FORTIUS Media Group, LLC P.S. I’m off to the Olympic Marathon Trials next week! Read about it on the Running Network websites in the sidebar to the right.
On Cloudflyer
Saucony Hurricane ISO 2 NEW SHOE
RENOVATION
Spring 2016
Spring 2016
American Track & Field www.american-trackandfield.com Athletes Only www.atf-athlete.com Athletics-Africa www.athletics-africa.com/s/ Austin Fit www.austinfitmagazine.com California Track & Running News www.caltrack.com Club Running (RRCA) www.rrca.org/publications/ club-running Coaching Athletics www.coachingathleticsq.com Colorado Runner www.coloradorunnermag.com Footnotes (Long Island, NY) www.glirc.org Get Active! & Club Business International www.healthclubs.com Hawaii Sport www.hawaiisportmag.com Latinos Corriendo www.latinoscorriendo.com Michigan Runner www.michiganrunner.net Missouri Runner & Triathlete www.morunandtri.com New England Exchange Zone www.usatfne.org Outdoors NW www.outdoorsnw.com Out There Monthly www.outtheremonthly.com Race Packet DC www.racepacket.com RunMinnesota www.runmdra.org Running Journal, Racing South www.running.net RunOhio www.runohio.com Track & Field News www.trackandfieldnews.com Winged Foot (NYC) www.nyac.org Winged M (Portland, OR) www.themac.com Youth Runner www.youthrunner.com www.ePodismo.com (Italy) www.ePodismo.com/USA www.HalfMarathon.net www.JumpingTheGun.com www.MarathonGuide.com www.RunBlogRun.com www.issuu.com/RunDenmark www.RunJumpThrow.com www.RunningProductReviews.com www.SlowTwitch.com www.USTFCCA.org www.WomenTalkSports.com www.WorldWideRunning.com
Project Coordinator/Editor: Christine Johnson Reviewer: Cregg Weinmann Designer: Kristen Cerer Proofreader: Marg Sumner, Red Ink Editorial Services, LLC Shoe Photography: Daniel Saldaña, Cregg Weinmann Advertising Sales: FORTIUS Media Group, LLC Publishing Director: Larry Eder, 608.239.3785, fortiusmedia@gmail.com Ad Manager: Adam Johnson-Eder, 608.556.9164, adamlawrenceeder@gmail.com Legal Counsel: Perry F. Goldust This 2016 Spring Shoe Review is produced independently by FORTIUS Media Group, LLC for its partner publications and websites. All shoes reviewed were tested by experienced, competitive runners who were matched to the biomechanical purpose of each shoe model.
adidas Ultra Boost ST
Nike Lunar Tempo 2 Motion Stabilizing
Performance
Spring 2016
Spring 2016
New Balance Fresh Foam 1080
Copyright © 2016 by FORTIUS Media Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be stored, copied, or reprinted without prior written permission of FORTIUS Media Group, LLC. Neutral Spring 2016
2016 Spring Shoe Review — 2 — FORTIUS Media Group, LLC
FORTIUS Media Group, LLC and its partner publications and websites suggest that, as with all fitness activities, you meet with a healthcare professional before beginning or changing your fitness regimen.
NEUTRAL The running line from 361˚ continues to broaden, adding more shoes in key categories. The Shield debuts in the Neutral category and is geared toward providing performance without breaking the bank. The upper is open mesh in the rearfoot with engineered mesh in the forefoot. Overlays at the toe and saddle shape and support the upper, and articulation at the lacing allows the shoe to conform to the midfoot and securely wrap the instep. The midsole features a new configuration of EVA and 361˚’s Qu!kfoam. The EVA makes up most of the midsole with a framework for the Qu!kfoam in the full heel and the forefoot’s center for added cushioning under the highest-pressure areas. The result is effective shock attenuation that’s durable enough to stand up to serious training. The outersole is a thin layer of rubber, well textured for grip, and segmented into nearly a dozen islands to flex as required as the foot twists and bends through the gait. The quality of the cushioning, fit, and durability at this price makes the Shield an excellent value.
361º Shield
110
$
HOKA ONE ONE Vanquish 2
170
$
HOKA ONE ONE’s acknowledged strength has been its maximum cushioning. The Vanquish 2 carries high the banner established by the Mafate and other models that launched the brand. The upper is closed mesh with 3D-printed overlays and splashy graphics. The fit is closer than some of its other models, but it’s pretty true to size. The midsole is two layers: a cradle of High Cushion EVA nestled into a High Rebound EVA cage. The 30-millimeter stack height (platform) offers protection, while the 5-millimeter geometry (the height difference between heel and toe) encourages efficiency. The outersole features thin carbon rubber at the perimeter of heel and forefoot and in a strip down the center of the forefoot. The remainder is toughened EVA. The cushioning is obvious, making the shoe great for recovery runs, but the Vanquish 2 is light for its size so it also rolls well at faster paces.
MBT is shorthand for Masai Barefoot Technology, a brand known for its foot-strengthening designs. The GT16 is the first of three new shoes by MBT developed specifically for running. The upper is a breathable mesh with no-sew, fused overlays supporting the foot with an assist from a traditional toecap and TPU heel counter. The midsole is a maximally cushioned design. But more than that, it’s adapted the MBT concept to a midsole design that features three zones: a cushy heel, a firm pivot beneath the arch, and a rockered forefoot. The outersole is thin, tough rubber that’s got good traction and durability. Where the original walking shoes and sandals were very soft in the heel and firm underfoot, the GT16’s heel is well cushioned but firmer and rocks smoothly to the toe on each stride. The result is a pretty versatile recovery shoe that can handle some serious mileage.
MBT GT16
150
$
New Balance Fresh Foam 1080
Neutral Spring 2016
150
$
Pearl Izumi N2 v3
120
$
Exhibiting some New England pragmatism, New Balance has done the inevitable, combining its best foam with its best Neutral shoe, resulting in the new Fresh Foam 1080. The upper is a closed mesh with a traditional saddle, featuring decoupled eyelets to wrap the foot effectively and securely. A smooth lining and plush ankle collar foam provide a deluxe feel against the foot. The midsole features Fresh Foam, with its lively feel and good protection. The shoe’s interior benefits from EVA Strobel board construction and a cushy polyurethane sockliner. The outersole is a full-length, hexagonal-shaped rubber compound that offers durability and good grip, while lateral flex grooves make this Fresh Foam configuration more flexible and responsive. A carbon rubber heel cap completes the deal. The sum of all this is an effective distance trainer. In fact, it’s so effective, it earned our award as the Best Shoe in the Neutral category.
Pearl Izumi’s EMotion flagship, the N2, has been a reliable performer, and Round 3 stays true to that mission. The upper is a stretchy, closed mesh, completely supported by no-sew overlays. A new foam layer in the tongue softens the feel, while its large open spaces offer good ventilation through the mesh outer layer. Though the supporting overlays have been pared back slightly, their 3D-printed placement continues to hold the foot effectively. The midsole has been known for being pretty firm, which is why it has a responsive feel—it transfers energy efficiently—and its proven design continues without change, which will be good news to its fans. The outersole continues with Round 2’s fullcontact design, which does two things: It improves the friction between the shoe and the ground, providing better traction and it offers maximum stability throughout the contact. The lateral midfoot—not coincidentally the area of lowest wear—is the only area of the sole which is toughened foam. The result is a smooth-riding, high-mileage shoe.
2016 Spring Shoe Review — 3 — FORTIUS Media Group, LLC
“Good fit and cushioning. Impressed with the cushioning and performance. You can put them on and forget about them.” NEW SHOE Sizes: Men 8–13,14; Women 6–12 Weight: Men 11.2 oz. (size 11); Women 9.1 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
“Fits well, but not super roomy. The cushy ride was what impressed. Really cushioned, but not mushy. Always surprised by how light they are.” Updates the Vanquish Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15; Women 5–11 Weight: Men 11.5 oz. (size 11); Women 9.2 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, perforated EVA Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
“Good fit with a pretty plush interior. The heel is nicely cushioned, but the best thing about the ride was how the foot rolls with the shoe.” NEW SHOE Sizes: Men 6–14; Women 5–13 Weight: Men 11.5 oz. (size 11); Women 9.2 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
“Really pleased with the fit, and the feel was premium. Great cushioning and responsiveness. I could get used to this.” NEW SHOE Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16 B,D,2E,4E; Women 5–11,12 2A,B,D,2E Weight: Men 11.3 oz. (size 11); Women 9.2 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
“Comfortable, smooth fit that tempted me to go without socks. Protective but in a subtle way, not a marshmallow.” Updates Pearl N2 v2 Sizes: Men 7–13,14; Women 5–11,12 Weight: Men 11.2 oz. (size 11); Women 9.1 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
&$
" % $ '
" ! $ ! ® $ ! !
' # !
MOTION STABILIZING adidas Ultra Boost ST
Motion Stabilizing Spring 2016
180
$
Altra Provision 2.5
The design and engineering of adidas’ Boost material have provided a ride that has great cushioning. Now with the introduction of the Ultra Boost ST, it has a shoe with stability to match. The upper is a stretchy, engineered mesh with different “zones.” The forefoot offers the most stretch with a band-like, bunion-friendly region over the metatarsals. The midfoot features a supportive TPU saddle that cradles the foot and anchors the lacing. The heel features the same thermoplastic heel counter and pull-on tab seen in its sibling, the Ultra Boost. The midsole is also the same: all Boost foam with bouncy, durable cushioning. The medial side is filled in beneath the arch for extra support on contact. On the medial sidewall, a thermoplastic support links the saddle to the outersole, stabilizing the ride without affecting the cushioning. The outersole is a Continental rubber compound that stretches elastically to keep the sole’s shape consistent through the gait. Its combination of a resilient ride, good stability, and accommodating fit earned the Ultra Boost ST our award for Best Shoe in the Motion Stabilizing category. Known for its zero-drop platform, Altra has a number of shoes over multiple categories. The Provision 2.5 is an intermediate update—Altra’s nod to a partial overhaul. In this case it’s the upper that gets the attention, with closed mesh and no-sew overlays providing support over the toes and through the saddle and with a stitched toe bumper shaping the height of the forefoot. The midsole is A-BOUND, a resilient foam that’s deeply segmented over a full-contact bottom to stabilize the foot by conforming to the running surfaces. A taller medial sidewall hinders too much inward roll. The outersole is a tough rubber compound that’s intersected by myriad flex grooves that also add traction. If you’re looking for a zero-drop shoe to add to your rotation, the Provision 2.5’s generous fit, stability, and geometry make it worthy of your consideration.
120
$
ASICS GT-2000 4
The 2000 series is well known for its decades-long reputation for smooth cushioning and stability. This update, Round 4 since its numerical reset to 2000, continues to provide the expected performance. The upper is now a slightly stretchy mesh with small openings instead of the closed mesh of its predecessor. No-sew overlays make the interior a bit smoother, without giving up the shaping or needed support of the upper. A new saddle shores up the midfoot, and its medial side is composed primarily of traditional overlays to handle support duties. The midsole is still FluidRide: several layers and densities, including GEL in the lateral heel and DuoMax in the medial arch, with a topmost layer of foam next to the foot. The outersole has the usual minor changes, but the flex grooves between the rubber pods follow the same path as Round 3. The best news is that the stability, ride, and fit have been well maintained in this high-mileage training shoe.
120
$
Brooks Ravenna 7
The Ravenna is the most versatile shoe in the Brooks lineup, neatly splitting the difference between cushioning and stability. The upper features only no-sew overlays to smooth the upper more than Round 6, simplifying the design in the process. The saddle continues with the effective strap and Ghilley lace setup to snug the midfoot, and the closed mesh does a surprisingly effective job of allowing the foot to breathe. The midsole tooling is smoothed, though the sidewall shaping and compression lines deliver the same feel. The reworked outersole is sparser, with few areas of solid rubber, and the weight savings is significant—almost an ounce! The flex grooves give the shoe better flexion without compromising stability. Runners new to the Ravenna and longtime fans alike will find much to be praised in this solid shoe.
120
$
Mizuno Wave Inspire 12
The Inspire has faithful followers because it has consistently delivered the ride and stability they expect from Mizuno shoes. The upper is open minimesh, similar to several of its recent predecessors because it breathes well. A return to traditional overlays in the rearfoot better supports the foot, and they work with the sole shape to keep the foot lined up. The midsole continues with U4ic foam and sports a new heel crashpad of U4icX, a livelier compound. A PU insole and foam Strobel board work with the midsole to give the ride a plusher feel. The outersole is still carbon rubber in the heel and blown rubber in the forefoot, though fewer flex grooves on the bottom and more in the sidewall make the cushioning and flexibility more effective than before. Large runners and those who steamroll shoes will find the Inspire is brawny enough to roll right back.
120
$
2016 Spring Shoe Review — 4 — FORTIUS Media Group, LLC
“The stability converted this skeptic. Fit well, great cushion, and stable.” NEW SHOE Sizes: Men 6.5–13,14,15; Women 5–12 Weight: Men 13.1 oz. (size 11); Women 8.9 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted Recommended for: low- to medium-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to excessive pronation
“Great toe room and cushioning. They were protective and durable. Still getting used to the zero drop.” Updates the Provision 2.0 Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15; Women 5–11,12 Weight: Men 11.4 oz. (size 11); Women 9.2 oz. (size 8) Shape: semistraight Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board Recommended for: low- to medium-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to excessive pronation
“Very stable, well cushioned, and for me, the ASICS fit is predictably good.” Updates the GT-2000 3 Sizes: Men 6–14,15,16,17 B,D,2E,4E; Women 5–13 2A,B,D,2E Weight: Men 12.0 oz. (size 11); Women 9.8 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with excessive pronation
“Secure fit, nice and stable, plenty of cushion. What more could I ask?” Updates the Ravenna 6 Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15 D,2E; Women 5–12 B,D Weight: Men 11.7 oz. (size 11); Women 9.5 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with mild to excessive pronation
“I have worn them for over 3 months. They grip well and put up with my Clydesdale punishment. They don’t interfere with my mechanics during running, they just keep going.” Updates the Wave Inspire 11 Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16; Women 6–12 Weight: Men 12.3 oz. (size 11); Women 9.8 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with mild to excessive pronation
MOTION STABILIZING Saucony Hurricane ISO 2
RENOVATION Spring 2016
The Hurricane has undergone more change in two generations than it has in most of the previous 16 combined. It starts with an update to the ISO fit saddle (aptly named ISO 2). Minimesh and fused overlays complete the forefoot, and an external thermoplastic heel counter secures the foot over the sole. But it’s in the midsole where the magic begins. A new compound that Saucony calls Everun puts a layer of blown TPU foam near the foot and a more resilient foam in the midsole. The compound’s flexibility allows better flexion with the foot’s motion and has a great feel to it. The outersole is a newly designed chevron pattern that adapts to a variety of angles, eliminating much of the stiffness experienced in many motion-controlling shoe designs. The stable ride, cushioning, and fit combine to earn the Hurricane ISO 2 our award for Best Renovation.
160
$
Skechers Forza
The Skechers GOrun line adds a new shoe designed for cushioned stability. Called the Forza, it’s Kara Goucher’s shoe of choice. The upper is a closed stretch mesh supported by no-sew overlays, and a saddle of thicker, fused film secures the foot effectively through the lacing. The midsole is a bouncy foam formulation with a 30-millimeter stack height that lends a cushy feel. A second density of foam and the full-contact geometry offer their own effective stabilizing properties. The outersole is carbon rubber from heel to midfoot, and the forefoot is primarily toughened foam with rubber in key wear areas. The fit, stability, and cushy ride make the Forza well suited to both regular training and recovery runs.
120
$
“I’ve been impressed with the Hurricane for years. This round is like a whole other level: comfy, durable, great fit. Now I’m really impressed.” Updates the Hurricane ISO Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15 D,2E; Women 5–12 B,D Weight: Men 11.5 oz. (size 11); Women 9.2 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, TPU Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with mild to excessive pronation
“Hadn’t tried Skechers so didn’t know what to expect. Good fit, cushion, stability. That’s a good running shoe!” NEW SHOE Sizes: Men 7–13,14; Women 6–10,11 Weight: Men 11.9 oz. (size 11); Women 9.8 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, PU Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to excessive pronation
PERFORMANCE Brooks Neuro
130
$
HOKA ONE ONE Tracer
130
$
Mizuno Wave Catalyst
110
$
The Neuro is a new Brooks shoe that’s both lightweight and adaptable, designed for maximizing fast, efficient running. The upper is a dual-layer, engineered mesh. The outer layer is a tough, gauze-like mesh supported by 3D-printed overlays while the inner layer is a light and breathable open mesh. Ghilley lace loops sandwiched between the mesh layers secure well while still adjusting to the moving foot, providing an adaptive fit. The midsole is a segmented arrangement of BioMoGO foam, with round Propulsion pods in the rearfoot and with Guidance Plates along the medial and lateral sides (taller ones medially and more uniform laterally) that flex as the foot passes over them. The 6mm geometry and flexible feel contribute to its go-fast purpose. The outersole is a collection of carbon rubber islands whose spaces allow the shoe to flex with the foot as it twists through the gait. The Neuro’s lightness and flexibility make it well suited to faster running, longer races, and speedwork.
The Tracer is a first for HOKA ONE ONE—a speedster with a traditional stack height—so expect a few double-takes when you wear them. The upper is a two-layer mesh composed of an open underlayer covered by a minimesh, with splashy graphics to identify the shoe. Fused overlays lend a measure of support so the mesh of the upper holds its shape well. The fit leans toward the snug side so size accordingly. The midsole is two densities, which HOKA calls Pro2Lite, and it’s a novel approach as the forefoot is quite firm while the heel is softer to manage the cushioning and spring needed by each part of the shoe. Like its HOKA siblings it features what has become a sort of midrange geometry, here 4mm of drop. The outersole is tough carbon rubber that’s thin and spaced sparingly, though sufficiently. The Tracer’s combination of light weight, springy and cushioned ride, and racerlike fit cater to faster running and racing.
Mizuno’s new Catalyst is a welcome addition to its line, slotting into the void left by the Elixir. The upper is a two-layered mesh: wide open underneath, minimesh on top. Traditional overlays support the toe, medial rearfoot, and lace throat with the Runbird logo forming a semisaddle and no-sew overlays running the length of the lateral side. The midsole has a substantial feel, low-slung but firm, especially in the heel, and the fan wave plate provides support and stability. The U4ic foam formulation has a responsive feel and good protection for long-distance runs. The outersole is X-10 carbon rubber in the heel and the lateral forefoot, which is great news for midfoot/forefoot strikers. Blown rubber covers the medial forefoot and toe. The combination of good stability and a light, responsive feel makes the Wave Catalyst suited to daily training, tempo runs, and even longer races.
2016 Spring Shoe Review — 5 — FORTIUS Media Group, LLC
“Really flexible. Let my foot feel free to run. Nice fit, plenty of cushion. They can really move.” NEW SHOE Sizes: Men 7–14; Women 5–12 Weight: Men 10.8 oz. (size 11); Women 8.7 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
“Once again, HOKA brings a shoe that was not what I expected. Fit nice and snug, races well, but with enough underfoot for any time I want a fast feel.” NEW SHOE Sizes: Men 7–13,14; Women 5–11 Weight: Men 8.5 oz. (size 11); Women 6.9 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, perforated EVA Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
“Love running in this shoe. I get a feel of the road with adequate cushioning and a springy feel.” NEW SHOE Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15; Women 6–11 Weight: Men 10.9 oz. (size 11); Women 8.8 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to excessive pronation
PERFORMANCE New Balance Fresh Foam Zante 2
100
$
Now in its fifth iteration, the Gravity has been the archetype for the Newton line for almost a decade. Round 5 maintains its technological core while freshening up the appearance and materials. The upper features an engineered stretch mesh for flexibility at the toe. Over the metatarsals they’ve used a smooth, closed mesh that’s supported by streamlined no-sew overlays for a forgiving stretchy feel in the bunion window. A new tongue offers a better feel and is anchored to the eyestay to prevent it from slipping side to side. The rearfoot has a stiffer mesh, with no-sew overlays tying into the logo stripes for support in a mini saddle-like design below the lace throat. The midsole has been resculpted to improve the ride, with better flexibility and cushioning. The contours of the insole have ameliorated the uneven feeling some runners experience in the area of the action/reaction membrane and lugs. The outersole has been retooled with attention to placement: The forefoot lug unit is inset into the midsole for a better foot/ground interaction, and new texturing of the rubber provides a bit better grip. This update succeeds in improving the overall ride and feel of the shoe.
Newton Gravity V
175
$
Spring 2016
The Lunar Tempo was a descendant of the Lunar Elite and Luna Racer, and Round 2 continues that genetic link to performance. The upper is a tighly woven Flyknit with no-sew overlays to lend a touch of support, shaping the toe for a more effective fit than Round 1. Adjustments have been made to the Flywire, reducing the number from five to four, and a reshaped eyestay gives a little more material to snug the top of the foot. The conforming upper has little structure, so your foot can settle in as is its wont, and the lightness and performance of Round 1 is untouched here. The midsole is a tough and resilient shell, with a softer cushioning layer inside. Though the Tempo’s midsole appears almost fragile, it most certainly is not, with a durability that contradicts its appearance. The outersole is just a few squares of rubber in the highest-wear portions—three in the heel, six in the toe, three on the lateral forefoot—with toughened foam making up the remainder. The combination of these components in a shoe that’s almost racer light, but with the toughness to handle faster training, earned the Lunar Tempo 2 our award for Best Performance Shoe.
NEW SHOE
The Cloudflyer is the second shoe for which On has converted its Cloud technology to an EVA platform. The result is a Swiss-engineered delight, a well-cushioned, sturdy shoe, that’s lighter than expected. The upper is semi-open mesh over the toes with closed mesh over the tongue and saddle, extending around the heel. A no-sew toecap gives the toes plenty of room, and since it links to the bottom of the eyestay, the laces have an extra criss-cross to snug the midfoot. The midsole is two densities of EVA, softer in the forefoot, with eight of the cloudtec Clouds, and firm over the heel with four Clouds. The ride exhibits the attention to detail for which On is known, hitting the sweet spot of resilience and protection, without giving up the necessary durability. The 7mm geometry makes it more efficient, to boot. The outersole is a thin rubber layer over the heel and angled across the toes, with toughened foam under the arch. Its performance, versatility, and design earned the Cloudflyer our award for Best New Shoe.
Nike Lunar Tempo 2
Performance
110
$
On Cloudflyer
Spring 2016
160
$
Saucony Kinvara 7
110
$
The Fresh Foam Zante’s introduction last year turned more than a few heads, and ushered in some speedier profiles for the brand. Round 2 throws in a few needed tweaks and keeps rolling down the fast track. The upper continues with its adaptable stretch mesh with little structure, and no-sew overlays lend support to shape the upper. The new design of the midfoot and lace throat permits the laces to adapt independently to secure the foot, and the roomy forefoot has been maintained. The midsole is Fresh Foam—its comfortable ride is the real strength of the shoe—and the sculpting fine tunes Round 1. The outersole is a thin, full-contact, rubber layer with different-sized hexagons and texturing delivering traction. The size and positioning of the hexagons create multiple flex points in the sole and have improved the traction over its predecessor. The Zante is a light, flexible shoe that’s well suited to faster running, whether long races or tempo runs, while being durable enough for daily training.
The Kinvara has been the heavyweight of the lightweights—not in weight, but in heft. Round 7 shows no sign of changing that, with new materials and improved performance. The upper is a mixture of closed mesh over the vamp and rearfoot. There’s open mesh over the toes and no-sew overlays where extra support is needed without contributing much extra weight. The midsole is lightweight, but with enough underfoot for fasterpaced training, tempo runs, and long races. Round 7 steps up the performance further with the introduction of Everun—a new construction—and the introduction of a blown TPU layer that gives the shoe another level of protection to go with its snappy ride. The outersole is still sparse: a well-placed pattern of rubber chevrons on lateral rearfoot and medial forefoot, the rest toughened foam. The bottom line? The Kinvara 7 is a lightweight, tough shoe for faster running and racing that can also handle a good share of daily training for efficient runners.
2016 Spring Shoe Review — 6 — FORTIUS Media Group, LLC
“Great cushioning and flexibility. Light, fit just right, and fast.” Updates the Fresh Foam Zante Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16 D,2E; Women 5–11,12 B,D Weight: Men 9.3 oz. (size 11); Women 7.4 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
“The Newtons have been a favorite fast-paced shoe for me, and I was really impressed with this update. [They] fit great. Smoothest ride yet. I haven’t found a downside in performance.” Updates the Gravity IV Sizes: Men 6–13,14,15; Women 5–12 Weight: Men 10.5 oz. (size 11); Women 8.5 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
“Good fit overall. Started out as my speed day shoe, but with plenty of cushion and good traction, it ended up handling more of my training than that.” Updates the Lunar Tempo Sizes: Men 6–13,14,15; Women 5–12 Weight: Men 7.9 oz. (size 11); Women 6.3 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
“Started as my everyday trainer, graduated to my marathon shoe. I need another pair. These are awesome.” NEW SHOE Sizes: Men 7–14; Women 6–11 Weight: Men 10.7 oz. (size 11); Women 8.7 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to moderate pronation
“A shoe this light that fits well and works for long runs is great. This one is a real upgrade.” Updates the Kinvara 6 Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15; Women 6–11 Weight: Men 8.7 oz. (size 11); Women 7.1 oz. (size 8) Shape: semicurved Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, TPU Strobel board Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics
WHAT A DIFFERENCE A CHANGE MAKES
Today’s Olympic Trials Marathon in extremely hot conditions didn’t offer many surprises as the top five female finishers were the same five as at the 2012 Trials. But the four years took 2012’s fourth-place finisher to the #1 spot in 2016. The women started at 10.22, just 16 minutes after the men, and the top women quickly went to the front. The contenders, Shalane Flanagan, Desi Linden, Amy Cragg, Kellyn Taylor, Kara Goucher, and Janet Bawcom, were in the lead pack. They passed mile one in a pedestrian six minutes and ran conservatively until about 10K, when Flanagan and Cragg, training partners and best friends, took the lead. Watching the two of them come through eight miles was pure poetry in motion. They looked like twins in their matching outfits and running stride for stride. Taylor and Goucher came next, followed by a small pack that included Sara Hall, Bawcom, Linden, and Serena Burma. The heavyweights were positioned for battle. Flanagan and Cragg continued to hold a large gap on the field. During the third lap of the four, Cragg hit a bad patch and Flanagan talked her through it. The following pack was breaking up, and Linden fell behind as did Burma. A bit later Hall dropped out. In the fourth lap Flanagan turned bright red and told Cragg she wasn't going to make it. Cragg intentionally slowed and got her training partner water. She told Flanagan to take it a mile at a time, and she could make it. With a mile to go, Cragg saw Linden coming and she put the pedal to the metal.
When I saw Cragg with 400 meters to go, I burst into tears. She'd made a drastic change in October, moving from Providence, RI to Portland, OR. She took a big chance and began training with Flanagan. They lived a spartan existence, consisting of only training and a time at altitude. They skipped all holidays and focused on Rio. They had no life but training and even did two runs on Christmas Day. After a disastrous 10-mile race in the Twin Cities, Cragg pulled it all together in four months. Such sweet redemption brought the smiles and accolades she so deserved. Meanwhile, Linden had executed her plan, although she said it was her longest marathon ever as it was a battle and horrible grind. She recorded the dreaded second-place finish, but she’s on the team. Flanagan was struggling and at mile 26, she was stumbling and weaving. I thought Goucher was beginning to catch her, but Flanagan is one tough cookie. She battled to the finish and collapsed into Cragg's arms. She had to go to medical as she was dehydrated and got her first IV. Despite their talent, all three women suffered mightily, as did all of the other participants. It was a true war on the course. I was dripping wet just standing and cheering. I do believe these three women will do great things in Rio. Many kudos to all who ran. You are all heroes!
photorun.net
18
American Track & Field
PhotoRun.net
derestimated American sprinter Barbara Pierre (7.02) parlayed a rocket start into
#9
#10
#9 / Heptathlon / Eaton, Beach Shine in Multi: Ashton Eaton coolly did his thing in winning his third consecutive world indoor heptathlon title. Eaton’s 6490-point total is #6 of all time as The World’s Greatest Athlete. He now has five of the top six heptathlon performances of all time. Coming from way back in the standings, Curtis Beach’s courageous final-event 1000 in 2:29.04—a new championship record—fell only eight points short of the bronze.
#8
American Track & Field
#10 / w60 / Barbara Pierre’s Upset Win: Un-
an upset win and her first global title. Dutch star Daphne Schippers, behind from the gun, couldn’t run down the American, but closed hard for second (7.04).
19
There are three facets of enjoyment for a long-scheduled, much-anticipated event that proves to be memorable: the anticipation, the actual experience, and the lasting reflection. Few would disagree that the 16th IAAF World Indoor Championships gathering proved its worth as one such event. There have been so many memorable moments— some overwhelming, others more subtle—it’s difficult to single out the best. While others will certainly have their own, different collection, here’s the list of my top-10 memorable moments—in ascending order, of course.
PhotoRun.net
16 IAAF World Indoor Championships, 2016: My Top-10 Moments
th
PhotoRun.net
#8 / Pentathlon / Theisen Eaton’s Gutty 800 Lifts Her to Gold: In third place and down 114 points to pentathlon leader Anastasiya Mokhyuk with one event to go, Brianne Theisen Eaton ran a spirited final event—the 800m—in a season-best 2:09.99 to earn 965 points, giving her just enough points (4881) to slide past the Ukrainian (4847) for the gold medal.
full attention. The efficient Frenchman needed only two jumps to win the men’s competition. The reigning Olympic champion then went on to set the championship record (6.02m/19’9”) and tantalized the capacity crowd with three attempts—albeit unsuccessful—at the world-record height of 6.17m/ 20’2¾”.
#5 / m3000 / Hill’s Near-Perfect Race Earns #7 / wPV / Jenn Suhr’s World Championship Him Silver: At the pre-race press conferClearance Highlights Her Victory: After fail- ence, Hill revealed he was shooting for
#5
ing to win the national vault title in the same venue the week before, Suhr came back strong. Carefully managing her attempts, the 34-year-old reigning Olympic champion took only four jumps and made them all to win the gold. Her last clearance at 4.90m/16’¾” set a new indoor championship record.
#6 / mPV / Renaud Lavillenie Jumps Seldom, Jumps High, Claims Title: Showcased during the first day’s opening ceremony, the pole vault events claimed the crowd’s
#7
a top-5 finish, but felt he “had a shot for [a] medal if [he] had a really good day.” The Bowerman Track Club athlete had that really good day. After a tepid start, the NC State graduate was able cover when defending champion Kenya’s Caleb Ndiku dramatically shifted gears with six laps remaining. Fifth at the bell, Hill never gave in. At full throttle over the final 100, Hill passed Marakesh’s Iguider off the final turn and caught Kenya’s Choge just before the line for the silver.
#6
champion and Olympic gold medalist Brittney Reese lost the early lead in the women’s long jump when Serbia’s Ivana Ŝpanovic stretched out a fifth-round leap of 7.07m/23’2½”. As she has done so many times before, Reese returned the favor when, on her sixth and final attempt, the American jump queen uncorked a world-leading leap of 7.22/ 23’8¼” to swipe the gold medal and claim yet another indoor world championship title.
#3 / wSP / Michelle Carter’s Buzzer Beater Last Throw: Going into the sixth and final round, Michelle Carter’s third-round heave of 19.31m/63’4¼” had held up as the event leader. With her final attempt, Hungary’s Anita Marton got the ball out 19.33m/63’5” to edge into the lead. But the American Shot Diva had one final throw remaining—and Carter made it
PhotoRun.net
#4 / wLJ / Brittney Reese’s Patented Clutch Final Jump Bomb: Multiple-time world
count as she unloaded a world-leading monster put of 20.21/66’3¾” to grab back the gold medal.
#2 / m1500 / Savvy Race Strategy Results in Gold for Centro: It was the elephant in the room. He’d won global medals before, but never gold. Would this be the time for Matthew Centrowitz? The race began cautiously. But Centro—the master of race positioning—was always in the right spot. Everyone could sense the pace winding up, but the real race began when Nick Willis spurted into the lead with two laps remaining. Although slightly gapped, Centro kept his cool. With 100 remaining and the decibel level inside the convention center never higher, the Millrose champion got on Willis’ shoulder, swung wide off the final curve in a full sprint, and overcame the Kiwi for the win, covering the final 300m in less than 39 seconds.
#3
#2
21
American Track & Field
#4
PhotoRun.net
#1
#1 / m800 / Bold Berian Is Courageous: Throwing caution to the wind, USA’s Boris Berian, an unsung McDonald’s employee just a year ago, simply went for it in the 800 meter final. After splitting 400 in 49.3 to forge a 15meter lead, Berian began to wobble with 150 meters remaining as he worked hard to hold on. Lifted by the roaring crowd, the fearless leader crossed the line in 1:45.83 to hold off a late charge by Burundi’s Antoine Gakeme (1:46.65). Erik Sowinski’s fine third-place finish (1:47.22) gave the USA two middle distance medals. You’ve got to risk it to get the biscuit. You’ll note my Top 10 is heavily weighted with American moments, and justifiably so. While I plead guilty to a bias in favor of my homeland, with the final count at a record 23 medals (13 gold, 6 silver, 4 bronze), Team USA simply had more grand moments. It’s true that the Olympic Games are still nearly five months away and anything can happen. And it can be fairly observed that many exceptional foreign athletes did not compete here. But this medal harvest—gathered notwithstanding that more than a few American medal prospects (e.g., Felix, Taylor, Merritt, Simpson, Gatlin) also elected to bypass the indoor season and/or this global championships—suggests there’s reason for optimism about America’s medal prospects in Rio.
photo courtesy of www.sportscoachradio.com
DENNIS MITCHELL
Larry Eder’s comments: Dennis Mitchell was controversial when he was named to this position as relay coach. Frustrating to Mitchell, most members of the media noted that he had a drug positive in 1998. The social media world noticed as well. USATF spent much time defending Mitchell. Is Dennis Mitchell a good coach? Sure seems so. He coaches Justin Gatlin, and Gatlin continues to improve. But a coach is more than someone with a good coaching technique. A coach is a role model for both young and veteran athletes. In the U.S., we’re big on second chances. Mitchell has developed a fine coaching business and is developing fine athletes. This was all after he tested positive nearly 20 years ago. As USA Track & Field represents the best of our sport, from the young kids running relays to our Olympic teams, it must realize that EVERYTHING it does is under the microscope. Sometimes, that microscope is unfair, but that's how the
world is. USATF teams are the role models for a million+ teenagers running track 46 weeks a year, six days a week. Sometimes, it seems like that’s forgotten. I question whether USATF should have considered Mitchell in the first place. The message is Winning Is Winning. Then, a rule change comes and, in February 2016, Mitchell tells Reuters that he's no longer relay coach due to the new USATF provision regarding the prohibition of a coach being made relay coach if they coach someone on the relay pool. Many think that this issue is over. But wait! On April 4, we read that (1) Dennis Mitchell never did actually resign, and (2) USATF has decided, in its magnanimity, to hold off and institute the rule for the next Olympic cycle. What is going on!? Not a conspiracy suggestion, but someone made an error here. USATF wanted mightily to avoid media curiosity, and now it has to justify to the media why Dennis Mitchell is still around. I’m not sure this is good for our sport. This makes USA Track & Field look like it will do anything to win a medal. It also makes USA Track & Field seem like it's above any rules, unless those rules work for the organization. As the canny Republication strategist Lee Atwater said years ago: “Perception is reality.� USATF shot itself in the proverbial foot here.
23
INDIANAPOLIS: Dennis Mitchell will stay on as the American relay coach for the Rio Olympics after officials at USATF decided to delay implementing a new policy for the job, informs Reuters. Mitchell, who coached Justin Gatlin, said in February he stepped down from the role due to a conflict of interests. USATF ha added a provision that prohibits a person from being the national relay coach if they coach someone who’s a member of the relay pool.
American Track & Field
is still the USATF relay coach, from EME News, with comments
O X Y MO R O N Hello S P E E D C U S H I O N. Introducing The Clayton. Maximal cushion. Minimal weight. So you can fly.
ho kao neon e. com