Q4 2008
Linking Behaviour to Bottom Line Performance
Leadership, Intangibles & Talent Q4 2008 Welcome to the first issue of the Four Groups Leadership, Intangibles and Talent review. The purpose is to try to distil and comment on some of the more interesting and articles shaping the field. That said, the subject matter is not strictly defined but takes into account wider economic issues, particularly given the challenging climate. In this issue, articles have been included from the likes of Deloitte, IBM, McKinsey, The Hay Group and Towers Perrin. There is no set criteria for inclusion, just that an article, survey or blog entry should be thought provoking, challenging or state more than the obvious. Comments and feedback are of course welcome. Summary for Q4 2008 Unsurprisingly, many articles are focusing on what it will take to emerge from the current downturn in a position of strength. As such the main themes focus on; • Is creativity and intelligence being filtered out of the system? • The need to let go of many of HR’s traditional functions • The need for senior level sponsorship • The psychological change agenda • Managing talent • Ethics and employee branding There seems to be considerable agreement that the organisations likely to manage and emerge from the downturn in the strongest position are ones which are; flexible, promote clear and consistent communication, are innovative and exhibit consistency between their internal and external behaviour. The theme tying all these attributes together is developing the ability to manage the intangibles of organisational behaviour, such as; social networks, collaboration, innovation and change.
Is creativity and intelligence being
deficiencies holding back the pace of
academia as much as scientific ability
filtered out of the system?
scientific progress, Charlton argues that
and this has a serious impact on the
the way the scientific process is organ-
pace and levels of innovation. Indeed,
Obviously the economic downturn is
ised is best suited to ‘plodders’ rather
this leads Charlton to argue that cre-
the hot topic. However, the article
than the ‘creative’ but sometimes
ativity and intelligence are being fil-
which really caught the attention, on
‘erratic’ thinkers who may be capable
tered out of the system.
the face of it, has nothing to do with
of genuinely revolutionary insight.
the current economic situation. Bruce Charlton blogs1 about a book he is cur-
Charlton points to the fact that success
“We can only conclude that science is
in modern science is often down to an
dull mainly because its requirements
rently writing. Focusing on structural
ability to navigate the bureaucracy of
for long term plodding, perseverance
Leadership, Intangibles & Talent Q4 2008
and social inoffensiveness have the
Tag Cloud
effect of ruthlessly weeding out too many smart and interesting people.” Charlton, Why are Scientists so Dull? This is all good stuff and got me wondering whether a similar dynamic is impacting the ability of organisations outside of the scientific community to encourage innovation and manage change? In particular do large organisations actively promote people to senior
strategic role in the organisation. For
Unless these three key areas are ade-
positions who are likely to struggle
instance, the report provides evidence
quately addressed, HR will continue to
with the twin challenges of innovation
that the focus on HR technology is
struggle to find the time — and the
and radical change? As will be shown
moving away from the process or deliv-
invitation — to make a more strategic
below, the consensus is that change is
ery side and is more focused on man-
contribution.” Towers Perrin, People,
the new normal and companies are
aging talent and performance through
Change and Performance: Emerging
going to have to exhibit an agility and
systems. In effect, HR practitioners are
Issues in HR Service, Delivery and
flexibility that has historically been dif-
no longer slaves to automation and
Technology
ficult to implement. Maybe one of the
time saving technology, but are instead
reasons for this inability is the presence
are placing more focus on the systems
The need for senior level sponsor-
of senior managers who are funda-
and technology which can deliver on a
ship
mentally unsuited to work in this type
strategic level. This is welcome news
of environment?
and potentially marks a key transition
This perspective is reinforced by an
in HR being able to develop a more The need to let go of many of HR’s
sophisticated and valuable dialogue
interesting interview in the McKinsey Quarterly3 with Beth Axelrod, head of
traditional functions
within the organisation.
HR at Ebay.
Elsewhere, a number of broad themes
Before this can happen however, the
companies have in hiring and retaining
are emerging. Many articles have
Towers Perrin report argues that HR
women, strategies she has seen suc-
sought to put a positive spin on recent
practitioners will need to let go of
ceed, and her view of how HR can
economic events and articulate a num-
many of the traditional HR functions;
become a strategic partner with busi-
In this interview, Ms.
Axelrod discusses the difficulties that
ber of opportunities which could poten-
nesses.
tially reshape the role of the HR func-
“HR must relinquish some control over
tion. One of the most comprehensive
mundane administrative processes
surveys this quarter is the Towers
and grow comfortable with line man-
difficulties companies have in hiring
Perrin,
and
agers and others playing a more active
and developing women in the work-
Performance: Emerging Issues in HR Service, Delivery and Technology2. This
role in decision making. Second, HR
place. As a McKinsey alumnus and co-
must learn to do more with the tech-
author of “The War for Talent” Axelrod
survey covers a wide range of HR
nology that it already has — making it
unsurprisingly takes an analytical and
issues, one of which concerns how the
more effective and more integrated
research-based approach to the prob-
HR function could develop over the
across disparate HR processes or tech-
lem and urges organisations to focus
medium term. The report draws atten-
nology platforms. Finally, success
on getting the basics right before any-
tion to a number of evolutionary issues
requires a well-planned and well exe-
thing else.
which may shed light on the perennial
cuted change management process.
People,
Change
conundrum of how HR can play a more
Ostensibly the interview focuses on the
Leadership, Intangibles & Talent Q4 2008
However, the most salient points focus
change agenda. In the current climate,
hinge primarily on technology –
on Axelrod’s assertion of the need for
change is not something which can be
instead, success depends largely on
senior level sponsorship and support
thought of as taking place on a period-
people…..
for HR initiatives, a universal theme in
ic basis. In the future and in order to
whatever you are hoping to achieve.
maximise flexibility and innovation,
Change challenges: The soft stuff is
Without this key component, HR is not
change is something which will be a
hard
going to be able to leverage any of its
constant and to achieve this organisa-
specific knowledge, insight or view of
tions will have to engineer a consider-
the organisation. There is no doubt that
able shift in workforce attitudes and
the level of senior level sponsorship
perceptions.
and communication determine the suc-
The main obstacles identified were: Changing mindsets and attitudes (58 percent)
cess of any corporate initiative, the
Across the board there is acknowledge-
Corporate culture (49 percent)
challenge in these tough times is for HR
ment that managing change is as much
Underestimating project complexity
practitioners to ensure that their col-
a psychological challenge as it is a pro-
(35 percent).” IBM, Making Change
leagues prioritise these issues highly
cedural or systemic one. Focusing on
Work
enough.
behaviours and reaction to change is a key issue. This is likely to become more
Furthermore, the report goes on to
Relationships are paramount to creat-
important over time as market condi-
echo the view that “change is the new
ing a connection between people and
tions require companies need to con-
normal.” As part of this assertion, peo-
the organisation and Axelrod notes the
stantly evolve. This is echoed by a cou-
ple are going to have to get used to
importance of informal networks with-
ple of reports from IBM. In the first, the executives surveyed5 said that in the
less hierarchy, control and supervision.
in the organisation in encouraging the development and success of individu-
future successful companies will be
considerable challenges, particularly
als. The development of social net-
“hungry for change and disruptive by
when it comes to communicating infor-
working is another theme emerging
nature”. Once again, the need for inno-
mation across complex organisational
from recent articles which is seen as a
vation and enabling greater collabora-
structures and geographies.
key tool for leveraging expertise and
tion across the organisation is widely
collaboration throughout the organisa-
acknowledged as a key component in
tion. Dovetailing nicely with this theme, over at Deloitte4 there is an interesting dis-
Dealing with this is going to present
Managing talent
the ability of organisations to successfully deliver strategic goals.
Another key aspect of managing in the
The second IBM survey6 focuses on
taken to talent management. The Hay
downturn is likely to be the approach
cussion about the relevance and com-
what they describe as “The Change
mitment of executives to the “our peo-
Gap”. This is the discrepancy between
Group published an interesting take on this particular issue7. Advocating an
ple are our greatest asset” mantra. The
the CEOs expecting substantial change,
approach based on the US Mutual Fund
discussion succinctly highlights the
a number increasing dramatically and
industry, the report highlights the dan-
additional challenges to living up to this
the apparent effectiveness or outcome
ger of placing all your eggs in one bas-
statement which current economic cir-
of change programmes, a number stay-
ket rather than a more balanced broad-
cumstances present.
ing roughly the same. The report also
er brush approach.
discusses the relatively low level of The psychological change agenda
success in change projects;
Meanwhile a Towers Perrin report on managing in the downturn8 advocates
The speed with which the unravelling
“What accounts for these vastly differ-
a three-pronged approach to managing
of the global economy has taken placed
ent rates of project success? We found
talent.
seems to have focused minds on what
in our detailed analysis of study results
I would loosely refer to as the new
that achieving project success does not
• Effective senior management
Leadership, Intangibles & Talent Q4 2008
• Taking a targeted and consistent
ple. Particularly when one takes into
Finally, how important is innovation
approach to dealing with cost and risk
account the earlier assertion that in the
going to be during the downturn?
issues
future there is going to be less hierar-
Innovation is another of those key
• Keeping employees focused and
chy and direct supervision. The first
intangibles which are naturally difficult
engaged
step in ensuring that information is understood across the board is to
to measure and quantify. A McKinsey report11 gives it a go. The headline fig-
The report argues that organisations
ensure that everyone is clear and
ures suggest that organisations which
should see the downturn as an oppor-
understands the organisation’s key val-
take a balanced portfolio approach to
tunity to focus on their most profitable
ues and direction.
innovation are more likely to achieve
activities and develop a consistent
high performance. There is also correla-
internal and external culture. All good
A good example of how an employer
tion between the number of metrics
advice but considerably easier said than
brand is likely to develop is the future
used to measure innovation and suc-
done.
role of CSR, most commentators agree
cessful outcomes. Will companies
that this is something which is likely to
spend the time and effort to pursue
On a wider level and slipping some-
gain in importance and it is down to
this?
what
the Government sponsored DIUS report9
organisations to show employees that
into developing our brains from cradle
deeds. The role of ethics within the
to grave. A wide-ranging report, it
organisation over the coming years is
The clear message from these articles is
focuses on three key areas; learning in
that HR is potentially in a very strong
the early years, wellbeing at work and
discussed in a Deloitte webcast (registration required)10. There is the sug-
position to play a key role in develop-
an ageing population. Of particular
gestion that this is another key lever in
ing the way organisations operate and
interest in the wellbeing at work, the
the search for employee and customer
how they will emerge from current
report identifies absenteeism and pre-
engagement. This is an interesting area
economic difficulties. A focus on the
under
the
radar
is
their words are backed up by their
Conclusion
senteeism as particularly pressing prob-
and again a key intangible, how best to
intangibles such as relationships, net-
lems in the workplace.
measure the ethical climate of an
works, culture and change is also likely
organisation? Something that is likely
key for long term success. The big
to require considerable senior level
caveat however is the level of sponsor-
Ethics and employee branding
commitment. The discussion advocates
ship and support that is available from
Another area which can potentially
that now is a good time to put this the-
senior management. At times like this,
help organisations manage the down-
ory into practice. Naturally there is a
it is easy to see how issues not specifi-
turn is employer branding and organi-
questioning of whether managers have
cally tied to the bottom line may well
sational identity. The argument goes;
the desire to engage in this subject at
be given short shrift.
the companies whose values are either
the moment. There are also some good
inconsistent or lacking clarity are going
tips on how to overcome resistance and
to struggle to effectively manage, com-
apathy.
municate and engage with their peo-
Four Groups Ltd 5 St. Johns Lane London EC1M 4BH, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 20 7250 4779 Email: contact@fourgroups.com www.fourgroups.com © 2009 Four Groups Ltd, 5 St. Johns Lane London EC1M 4BH, United Kingdom. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced without express written permission from Four Groups Ltd.
Company Number: 4650494 VAT Number: 817 7962 85 Registered in England and Wales
Leadership, Intangibles & Talent Q4 2008
Footnotes and References 11. McKinsey “Assessing innovation 1. Bruce Charlton “Why are Scientists so
metrics:
Dull?” http://fourgroups.com/link/?1
Results”
McKinsey
Global
Survey
http://fourgroups.com/link/?14 2. Towers Perrin “People, Change and Performance: Emerging Issues in HR Service, Delivery and Technology” http://fourgroups.com/link/?2 (opens as a pdf) 3. McKinsey Quarterly “The challenge of hiring and retaining women: An interview with the head of HR at eBay” http://fourgroups.com/link/?3 4. Deloitte “Are People Really Your Most Important Asset?” http://fourgroups.com/link/?4 5. IBM “Unlocking the DNA of the
About Four Groups
Adaptable Workforce” http://fourgroups.com/link/?5
Four Groups have developed a new approach called 4G to understand
6. IBM “Making Change Work”
behaviour, relationships and culture. 4G
http://fourgroups.com/link/?6
provides its users with insight into per-
7. The Hay Group “Adopting a mutal-
develop within teams and groups and
funds model for talent management”
how culture can be best defined and
http://fourgroups.com/link/?7
managed.
8. Towers Perrin “Managing Amid
4G provides organisations with infor-
sonal characteristics, how relationships
Market Turmoil: Top Priorities for
mation on how best to deploy and opti-
Business and HR Leaders”
mise the performance of their people.
http://fourgroups.com/link/?8 (opens
It also enables preventative measures
as a pdf)
to be taken which minimise the less productive aspects of interaction and
9.
Department
for
Innovation,
group dynamics such as friction and
Universities and Skills “Developing our
misunderstanding between colleagues.
brains from cradle to grave” http://fourgroups.com/link/?9
4G represents a systematic approach to managing the previously intangible
10. Deloitte “Why Measuring the
aspects of organisational life. The
Corporate Climate for Ethics Should Be
methodology is easily replicable and
On Your Radar”
can be implemented quickly and effi-
http://fourgroups.com/link/?10
ciently.