DWP Work Programme analysis 2012

Page 1

Work Programme Analysis of benefit claims for first cohort of Work Programme participants


Overview of the analysis Relatively simple analysis of the first people in the Work Programme: •  identified the benefit records of June 2011 attachments and tracked their benefit status over their first 36 weeks of the programme. •  Able to say where they had a break in claim, how long for, and if they returned to benefit. •  Analysis of DWP data only, so nothing from providers on actual jobs or payments. •  Important context: not an evaluation, performance assessment or comparison with other programmes. Too soon / too little data.


Key Findings Nine months into a two year programme, we can see that‌ Of the 28,600 people who attached in June 2011 13,800 people, nearly 1 in 2, have signed off at some stage

7,000, 24% have already had a continuous 13 week break in claim A significant proportion (14%) have already had a 26 week break in claim 1 in 4 (25%) were not on any benefit at the end of the data period Of the earliest leavers, 71% stayed off benefit for 13% weeks, and 60% for 26 weeks.


Analysis

Early progress into the cohort, 36 weeks in %

Where at 2 years, and beyond?

25% not on any benefit, at 36 weeks

Time 36 Week tracking period

104 week programme duration


Time off benefit 1:

counting sustained spells in 36 week window

24% of cohort have at least 13 weeks continuous spell recorded within the period

14% of cohort have at least a 26 week continuous spell within the period

36 week tracking period

We can only count spells which fall entirely in the tracking period – pink spells don’t count


Time off benefit 2:

The 10 week cohort

Key Points:  Closest to the ERSA cohort (attached in June, left by September)  Use of 10 week cohort allows us to track decay rate over full 26 weeks  Shows that for those that leave, chances of returning to benefit are low  Encouragingly low attrition between 13 and 26 weeks.

3,900 people leave by the 10 week point

71% still off benefit at the 13 week point

13 Weeks 10 weeks

26 weeks

60% off for at least 26 weeks


Conclusions Not yet conclusive proof of performance, as: •  •

Early days providers paid on different measure

But: •  •

Already very clear evidence of time off benefit Encouraging results on continuous spells of 13 and 26 weeks.

Overall, a promising start… Next steps •  •

First data on outcomes in the autumn Evaluation from 2013 onwards


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.