In the context of combating cyberbullying, one of the main problems is the lack of human resources for working with all audiences and specific topics at the same time.
DMYTRO ZOLOTUKHIN, DEPUTY MINISTER OF INFORMATION POLICY OF UKRAINE
Therefore, at the moment, we are focused on a priority threat for us – that is cyberbullying in a children’s environments, especially at preschool and school age. We believe that for this audience the consequences of cyberbullying can be the most negative. We are trying to work together with community experts in this field, during one of our round tables organized by us, NGO La Strada presented their research and data on hotline for children, among which there was emphasized a significant percentage of actualized threats online, including cyberbullying. Together with the experts, we have agreed to work towards the development of recommendations and content,
primarily for parents who have relevant tools and are responsible for the children, so that they know about the threats which can be expected online. Of course, we are also trying to build a constructive dialogue with Facebook social network administration, for them the issue of hate speech is of great importance. Our goal is to help them to gain a better understanding of our national specifics and, in turn, to take over and implement the best practices that social networks use to prevent the spread of aggressive content, up to the imposition of certain sanctions on those who share it. As far as I know, the practice of imposing liability on people who cyberbully others in the European Union is currently being applied. The topic is sensitive, but I do not think that this is a matter of Internet freedom. Freedom ends where the rights of another person begin.
3
CONTENTS RESEARCH DESIGN..................................................................................................................... 4 MAIN CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................................................. 5 DESCRIPTION OF TARGET AUDIENCE: ONLINE ACTIVITY................................... 7 CYBERBULLYING EXPERIENCED BY ACTIVISTS.......................................................... 13 FORMS OF CYBERBULLYING ON DIFFERENT ONLINE PLATFORMS............... 19 INSTITUTIONS RESPONDING TO CYBERBULLYING................................................... 25
RESEARCH DESIGN
Target audience
Gender equality activists LGBT activists HIV activists
Geography
No restrictions on residence
Method
Online interview (duration up to 15 min.)
Sampling
194 interviews
Field work
19 August - 1 September
5
MAIN CONCLUSIONS
GENERAL TENDENCIES 1.
Most prominently positions of activists are expressed in the social network Facebook (79%) – by active commenting, making posts about activities, etc. Also, platforms for ‘active positioning’ of activists are comments on news (51%) and Instagram (49%)
2.
Gender equality activists are more actively using Twitter, and there is a significant presence of LGBT and gender equality activists on YouTube, while HIV activists almost do not use this media channel for their activities
3.
In general, 71% of the respondents were victims of cyberbullying (from isolated cases (49%) to persistent persecution (4%). This contrasts sharply with respondents’ responses about safety feeling when 61% said they feel safe
4.
This may indicate that now cyberbullying is not perceived as a threat to online safety and activists can hardly assess its consequences
5.
Most commonly victims of cyberbullying are men (74%), and among activists: HIV (79%) and LGBT (71%)
6.
Most commonly activists experience such forms of cyberbullying: • insults under comments on news on Facebook (33%) and Twitter (33%) • threats on Facebook (35%) • intimidation on forums (13%) • blocking activity on Facebook (6%) and Instagram (6%) • spam attacks on Facebook (4%)
7.
One third of respondents, personally or through the organization to which they belong, experienced attacks on their activity in Internet (content blocking). This is more pronounced among HIV activists (42%) and gender equality activists (37%)
8.
Only 20% of cyberbullying victims applied to different institutions to stop bullying. Most often they refer to: • Non-governmental human rights organizations • International organizations • Administrators of online platforms • Relatives / close friends • The Office of the Ombudsman
9.
Main resons for not reporting cyberbullying cases are: • Disbelief that the competent authorities would help • Lack of knowledge who to report to • Personal opinion that cyberbullying cannot be influenced
10. Activists believe that cyberbullying should be reported to cyber police/ police (58%) and to NGOs, human rights organizations (51%) 11. The most effective means of combatting cyberbullying for activists are complaints to the administration of social networks / resources, where a violation of rights occurred (59%), as well as offline educational work about the danger of cyberbullying (37%) 12. At the same time, 26% of activists point out that they do not see effective means of combating cyberbullying
7
DESCRIPTION OF TARGET AUDIENCE: ONLINE ACTIVITY CHARACTERISTICS OF TA: GENDER, AGE, SUBJECTIVE FEELING OF SAFETY ON THE INTERNET •
Most represented are LGBT activists (62%), almost twice as much as gender equality activists (34%), and the least represented are HIV activists (15%)
•
The proportion of those who feel in danger on the Internet is 36%. HIV activists (50%) are more likely to feel in danger
Proporion*
Gender equality ac�vists
LGBT
HIV
194
122
30
67
100%
62%
15%
34%
All Quan�ty of respondents*
Gender Woman
66%
64%
43%
Men
28%
25%
57%
19%
11%
0%
0%
Non-binary
6%
81%
AGE less 20 years old
11%
13%
0%
15%
20-29 years
41%
45%
36%
37%
30-39 years
28%
25%
29%
33%
40-49 years
16%
14%
36%
11%
50 and older
3%
4%
0%
4% 11%
Subjec�ve feeling of safety online** In general I feel safe, I met construc�ve cri�cism
13%
13%
21%
Rather safe, although there were isolated cases of threats, insults etc.
48%
54%
29%
48%
Rather Unsafe, from �me to �me I face threats, insults etc.
32%
32%
50%
22%
Completely Unsafe, I constantly face threats, insults
4%
2%
0%
11%
Difficult to answer
2%
0%
0%
7%
*target audiences may partly overlap **How safe do you feel when you express your views as an activist on the Internet?
DISTRIBUTION OF ACTIVISTS BY GENDER •
Men are more likely to be HIV activists, while women become gender equality activists
•
At the same time, non-binary people are LGBT activists
100% 90% 80%
11% 25%
70%
HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERISE YOUR SPHERE OF ACTIVISM?
19%
Non-binary 57%
60%
Men
50%
81%
40% 30%
64% 43%
20%
Women
10% 0%
LGBT
HIV
Gender equality
9
ONLINE ACTIVITY: TA IN GENERAL •
Most prominently positions of activists are expressed in the social network Facebook (79%) – by active commenting, making posts about activities, etc.
•
Also, platforms for ‘active positioning’ of activists are comments on news (51%) and Instagram (49%)
Ac�ve behavior on the Internet I tend to comment, respond to others, and do not publish content
I ac�vely express my views and comment on my social ac�vity
57%
29%
Comments on news/events
Youtube
15%
19% 13% 11%
19%
25%
21%
Twi�er Newsle�ers
20%
26%
Forums
23%
23% 25% 23%
11%
21% 19% 9% 14% 19%
More likely to read
15% 22%
5%
5%
2% 3%
24% 40%
7%
42%
6%
41% 33%
I use for entertainment purposes only
14% Do not use this pla�orm
PROPORTION OUT OF ALL RESPONDENTS
ONLINE ACIVITY: LGBT ACTVISTS •
LGBT activists are more likely to use Facebook, Instagram and comments on news
•
Twitter and newsletters are used the least often among these platforms PROPORTION
62%
OUT OF ALL RESPONDENTS
62%
ТОP3 Most Popular Pla�orms
Facebook Facebook
57%
36%
Comments on news/events Forums
23%
23%
Twi�er
16%
Newsle�ers
16%
Youtube
16%
16% 5% Instagram
21%
32%
20% 16% 20% 25% 20%
7%
16%
14%
5%
Comments on 13% 5% 43% news/events 11%
9% 16%
Forums
5%
21%
Newsle�ers
36%
21%
16%
52%
32% 23%
45%
Twi�er
23%
80% 57%
29%
46%
32%
4%
57%
16%
16% 16%
20% 16% 20% 25%
14%
13% 7%
5%
11% 9%
5%
5%
11
15%
ONLINE ACTIVITY: HIV ACTIVISTS •
In addition to the traditional active use of Facebook, HIV activists are represented on Forums, Twitter and Newsletters.
•
Worth noting that YouTube is used exclusively for entertainment and contemplative purposes 15%
PROPORTION OUT OF ALL RESPONDENTS
PROPORTION OUT OF ALL RESPONDENTS TOP 3 most popular pla�orms Facebook Forums
7%
29%
Twi�er
21%
14%
Newsle�ers
14%
Comments 7% on news Youtube
29%
43%
7%
14% 7%
29% 21%
21%
50% 50%
21%
7% 7% 43%
Twi�er 35%
21%
14%
Newsle�ers
14%
14%
29
29%
35%
14%
36%
36%
36%
Forums
36%
7%
43%
7%
36%
29% 21%
Facebook 72%
21%
Comments 7% on news
7% 14%
21% 29%
7% 21% 21%
29%
36%
50%
34%
ONLINE ACTIVITY: GENDER EQUALITY ACTIVISTS •
Gender equality activists are more likely to use Twitter
•
There is a prominent presence of gender equality activists on YouTube
•
Among active commentators on various information posts on the Internet are standing out gender equality activists
34%
PROPORTION OUT OF ALL RESPONDENTS
PROPORTION OUT OF ALL RESPONDENTS TOP 3 MOST POPULAR PLATFORMS Facebook
63%
Comments on news
22%
Twi�er
22%
22%
Forums
11%
Youtube
7%
Newsle�ers
7%
19% 37%
19%
33%
7%
22% 19%
19% 26%
37% 26%
15%
7%
19%
4%
11%
26% 37%
30%
19% 44%
59% 55%
37%
7% 7%
11% 4%4% 82%
63
Comments on news
22%
Twi�er
22%
22%
Forums Youtube
11% 7%
2 19% 37%
13
29% CYBERBULLYING EXPERIENCED BY4%ACTIVISTS 49% • • •
18% Almost two thirds of the respondents were victims of cyberbullying This contrasts sharply with respondents’ responses about safety feeling when 61% This does not said they feel safe happen to me There were isolated casest Most commonly victims of cyberbullying are men (74%), and among activists: HIV (79%) and LGBT (71%)
29% 4%
49%
18%
This does not happen to me There were isolated casest
From �me to �me I face cyberbullying
From �me to �me I face cyberbullying
I constantly face cyberbullying myself
I constantly face cyberbullying myself
LGBT ac�vists This does not happen to me
54%
From �me to �me Час від часу маю Iдосвід face cyberbullying цькування
ЯIпостійно constantlyстикаюсь face із цькуванням мою cyberbullyingна myself адресу
14%
4%
There випадки were Поодинокі
43%
From �me to �me Час від часу маю Iдосвід face cyberbullying цькування
36%
0%
There випадки were isolated були casest Поодинокі isolated були casest
54%
44%
From �me to �me Час від часу маю Iдосвід face cyberbullying цькування
From �me to �me Час від часу маю Iдосвід face cyberbullying цькування
із цькуванням мою cyberbullyingна myself адресу
14%
15%
ЯIпостійно constantlyстикаюсь face із цькуванням мою cyberbullyingна myself Я Iпостійно стикаюсь constantly face адресу 7%
T h
29%
This does nothappen to me 33% happen to me
21%
Thereвипадки were Поодинокі isolated були casest
I constantly face cyberbullying myself
Gender equality ac�vists This does not
This does not happen to me
29%
There випадки were Поодинокі isolated були casest
LGBT ac�vists
HIV ac�vists
4%
T Поодин isб
From Час в Iдосві face
I consta cyberbu
61%
61%
CONTENT BLOCKED DUE TO OTHER USERS’ TARGETED COMPLAINTS • •
6% 2% 11%
One6% third of activists at least once experienced targeted campaigns 2%to block their content aimed 11% 20% activists are more likely to experience it Gender equality
20%
No, I don’t remember such cases
No, I don’t remember such cases
Several �mes this happened
Several �mes this happened
From �me to �me this happens
From �me to �me this happens
I constantly face it
I constantly face it
Difficult to answer
Difficult to answer
LGBT ac�vists
LGBT ac�vists
HIV ac�vists
Gender equality ac�vists No, I don’t remembert
66%
such cases
No, I don’t remembert such cases
66%
Several �mes this happened �meтаке to Час From від часу �me this happens трапляється constantlyіз Постійно Iстикаюсь таким face it Difficult to answer
23% 5% 0% 5%
No, I don’t remembert such cases
57%
Several �mes this happened
21%
From �me to Час від часу таке �me this happens трапляється I constantly Постійно стикаюсь із таким face it Difficult to answer
14% 7% 0%
No, I don’t remembert Several �mes such cases
52%
23%
this happened
Several �mes �meтаке to Час From від часу 11% this happened �me this happens трапляється
5%
From �me to Час від часу таке Iстикаюсь constantlyіз Постійно �me this happens face it 22%0% трапляється таким I constantly Постійно стикаюсь із Difficult to 4% таким face it answer Difficult to answer
11%
5%
No, I don’t r
Sev this
Fro Час від �me th трапл
I Постійно ст таки
15
RESPONDING TO CYBERBULLYING •
Only 20% of cyberbullying victims applied to different institutions to stop bullying
•
Women are more likely to respond to cyberbullying, and among activists – those responding mostly LGBT
Distribu�on by gender 21%
Only 20% of cyberbullying vic�ms have experience of responding to it
Women 79%
Men Non-binary
Distribu�on among ac�vists
Only 20% of cyberbullying vic�ms have experience of responding to it
LGBT ac�vists
14% 22%
64%
Gender equality ac�vists HIV ac�vists
Experience of repor�ng
WHO ACTIVISTS ARE MORE LIKELY29% TO REPORT орів ресурсів dministrators TO CUBERBULLYING?
niza�ons /• / організацій organiza�ons організацій
organiza�ons х організацій
Most commonly they referred to: NGOs, 29%international organizations, administrators of online platforms, relatives/close friends and the Office of the Ombudsman
29%
e Ombudsman
21%
/close friends
/Cyber police
21%
До ресурсів Toадміністраторів resource administrators
29%
public organiza�ons / / До To громадських організацій 7% human rights organiza�ons правозахисних організацій
29%
To organiza�ons Доinterna�onal міжнародних організацій
29%
cutor’s Office
0%
To Media
0%
To Court
0%
other
20%
The Office of the Ombudsman
0%
21%
To rela�ves/close friends
21%
To Police/Cyber police
7%
To Prosecutor’s Office
0%
To Media
0%
To Court
0%
other
0%
Experience of repor�ng
20%
17
WHY TA IS NOT REPORTING CYBERBULLYING? Most common motivation for not reporting is lack of trust in the competent authorities, lack of knowledge of action steps in such cases, a personal opinion that cyberbullying can not be influenced
BY FREQUENCY OF MENTIONING
•
Disbelief of effectiveness of reporting
• • • •
I do not see any sense Time wasted The authorities do not deal with such appeals No one can protect
Lack of knowledge who to report to
• •
I don’t know where to report to Who deals with such appeals
Not knowing legislation regulating the issue
• •
We do not have the relevant legislation There is no mechanism that regulates such cases
A special attitude to the Internet
• •
Internet is a free space, even for insults Cyberbullying is not followed by any real actions
Fear that the situation might get worse
•
Bullying will become more harsh
REASONS FOR REFUSAL TO RESPOND TO CYBERBULLYING: TA WHY DIDN’T YOU REPORT TO ANYONE IN A CASE OF CYBERBULLYING AGAINST YOU?
Did not consider it to be serious enough
Internet is a free space to express your thoughts
Do not believe I would get any help Do not know who to report to Oher
Laws of this country do not protect me
Do not see any sense Cyberbullying is not followed by real actions
Didn’t want to
19
29%
FORMS OF CYBERBULLYING ON 35% DIFFERENT ONLINE PLATFORMS 13% CYBERBULLYING: FACEBOOK •
29% 35%
4% 1% 6% 12%
13% 4% 1% 6% 12%
Insults One-third of respondents experienced insults and threats on Threats Facebook
Insults Threats
In�mida�on
•
In�mida�on
HIV activists, in addition to threats, often face intimidation Blocking your ac�vity
Blocking your ac�vity
«Black PR»
LGBT ac�vists Образи Insults
In�mida�on Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності «Blackпіар» PR» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки бувexperience жертвою DidНеnot кібербулінгу cyberbullying
35% 5% 8%
Spam a�ackst
Did not experience cyberbullying
Did not experience cyberbullying
Insults
5% 15%
36%
0%
Блокування вашої 27% Blocking your ac�vity активності «Blackпіар» PR» «Чорний
9%
Spam a�acks Спам-атаки
Spam a�acks
9%
бувexperience жертвою DidНеnot кібербулінгу cyberbullying
Did not experience cyberbullying
9%
HIV ac�vists
Gender equality ac�vists 33%
Погрози Threats
In�mida�on
Залякування In�mida�on Blocking your ac�vity
Образи Insults
9%
Погрози Threats
«Black PR»
0%
LGBT ac�vists
HIV ac�vists 33%
Погрози Threats
«Black PR»
Spam a�ackst
35% 5% 8% 0%
Залякування In�mida�on
15%
33%
«Black піар» PR» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки був жертвою DidНе not experience кібербулінгу cyberbullying
9%
Погрози Threats
Погрози Threats
Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності
5%
Insults
Образи Insults
36%
33%
Залякування In�mida�on
17%
Blocking your ac�vity
6% «Black PR» 0%
27% 0% 9%
Spam a�acks
9%
Did not experience 0% cyberbullying
9%
11%
33%
33%
23%
23% 33%
6% CYBERBULLYING: COMMENTS3% ON NEWS • •
33% 1% Insults are most often displayed in the comments on news
Insults Погрози Threats Залякування In�mida�on Блокування вашої активності Blocking your ac�vity «Чорний піар» «Black PR» Спам-атаки Spam a�acks Не кібербулінгу Didбув notжертвою experience cyberbullying
Insults
Insults are more pronounced against LGBT activists, while HIV activists Погрози Threats Залякування are more likely to face threats In�mida�on Блокування вашої активності Blocking your ac�vity «Чорний піар» «Black PR» Спам-атаки Spam a�acks Не кібербулінгу Didбув notжертвою experience cyberbullying
LGBT ac�vists
LGBT ac�vists
HIV ac�vists
Insults Образи
40%
Threats Погрози In�mida�on Залякування Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності «Blackпіар» PR» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Неnot бувexperience жертвою Did cyberbullying кібербулінгу
23%
Insults Образи
0%
Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності «Black PR» «Чорний піар»
0%
Spam a�acks Спам-атаки
3%
28%
In�mida�on Залякування
Threats Погрози In�mida�on Залякування
8%
9%
DidНе notбув experience жертвою cyberbullying кібербулінгу
Блокування вашої 45%Blocking your ac�vity
9%
0% 27%
8%
23% Образи Insults
33%
Threats Погрози
11%
In�mida�on Залякування
0%
Blocking your ac�vity Spam a�acks Спам-атаки 0% активності
0%
Spam a�acks Спам-атаки
«Black піар» PR» «Чорний 28%
0%
DidНе notбув experience жертвою cyberbullying кібербулінгу
3%
0% Блокування вашої
Spam a�acks Спам-атаки був жертвою DidНеnot experience cyberbullying кібербулінгу
9%
Threats Погрози
In�mida�on Залякування
Неnot бувexperience жертвою Did cyberbullying кібербулінгу
0%
Insults Образи
Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності «Black PR» «Чорний піар»
активності «Blackпіар» PR» «Чорний
9%
HIV ac�vists
40%equality ac�vists Gender
Threats Погрози
Insults Образи
6% 3% 1%
6% 50%
45% 9% 9% 0% 0% 27%
21
33%
33%
22%
22%
1% 6% 1% 1%
35%
CYBERBULLYING: TWITTER •
Insults Образи Threats Погрози In�mida�on Залякування Блокування активності Blocking yourвашої ac�vity «Чорний піар» «Black PR» Спам-атаки Spam a�acks Не кібербулінгу Didбув notжертвою experience cyberbullying
Insults Образи
Situation with cyberbullying on Twitter is Threats Погрози similar to cyberbullying In�mida�onin comments on news Залякування Блокування активності Blocking yourвашої ac�vity «Чорний піар» «Black PR» Спам-атаки Spam a�acks Не кібербулінгу Didбув notжертвою experience cyberbullying
LGBT ac�vists
LGBT ac�vists
HIV ac�vists
Insults Образи
45%
Threats Погрози In�mida�on Залякування Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності «Blackпіар» PR» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Did Неnot бувexperience жертвою cyberbullying кібербулінгу
1% 6% 1% 1%
35%
20%
Insults Образи
18%
Threats Погрози
27%
In�mida�on Залякування
0% 0% 3% 0% 32%
18%
Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності «Black PR» «Чорний піар»
0%
Spam a�acks Спам-атаки
0%
Did Неnot бувexperience жертвою cyberbullying кібербулінгу
HIV ac�v
Gender equality ac�vists Insults Образи
Insults Threats Образи Погрози
45%
20%17%
In�mida�on Threats0% Залякування Погрози
In�mida�on Залякування
22%
Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity 0% In�mida�on Залякування активності «Blackпіар» PR» Блокування вашої «Чорний
11%
Blocking your ac�vity3% 0% активності Spam a�acks Спам-атаки «Blackпіар» PR»0% «Чорний
9%
Did Неnot бувexperience жертвою cyberbullying Spam a�acks кібербулінгу
Спам-атаки
27%
Неnot бувexperience жертвою Did cyberbullying кібербулінгу
0% 6%
Insults Образи Threats Погрози
Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності «Black PR» «Чорний піар»
0%
Spam a�acks Спам-атаки
0%
Did Неnot бувexperience жертвою cyberbullying кібербулінгу
32%
44%
9%
28%
19% 6% 6% 3%
CYBERBULLYING: INSTAGRAM •
28%
HIV activists are more likely to experience threats and activity blocking on Instagram
LGBT ac�vists
LGBT ac�vists Insults Образи
In�mida�on Залякування Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності «Blackпіар» PR» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Did Неnot бувexperience жертвою cyberbullying кібербулінгу
HIV ac�vists Insults Образи
30%
Threats Погрози
23% 8%
Threats 9% Insults Погрози Образи
3%
In�mida�on Залякування Threats Погрози
23%
Спам-атаки
8%27%
35%
Did Неnot бувexperience жертвою cyberbullying кібербулінгу
0% 27%
Образи Insults Threats Погрози In�mida�on Залякування Blocking your вашої ac�vityактивності Блокування «Black PR»піар» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Did був not experience cyberbullying Не жертвою кібербулінгу
Insults Образи
активності Spam a�acks Спам-атаки «Black PR» «Чорний піар»
Did Неnot бувexperience жертвою cyberbullying Spam a�acks кібербулінгу Спам-атаки
Неnot бувexperience жертвою Did cyberbullying кібербулінгу
Образи Insults
9%
Threats Образи Insults Погрози
Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity In�mida�on Залякування активності «Black PR» Блокування вашої «Чорний піар» Blocking your ac�vity
35%
Gender equ
Gender equality ac�vists
In�mida�on Threats Залякування Погрози
Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity In�mida�on Залякування активності 9%3% «Black PR» «Чорний піар»
Did Неnot бувexperience жертвою cyberbullying Spam a�acks кібербулінгу
0%
39%
HIV ac�vists 30%
Блокування вашої 3% Blocking your ac�vity 27% активності Spam a�acks 0% «BlackСпам-атаки PR» «Чорний піар» 0%
3%
6% 6% 3%
39% Образи Insults Threats Погрози In�mida�on Залякування Blocking your вашої ac�vityактивності Блокування «Black PR»піар» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Did був not experience cyberbullying Не жертвою кібербулінгу
19%
Threats Погрози
27%33%
In�mida�on Залякування
9% 6%
0%
Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності «Blackпіар» PR» «Чорний
27%
0%
0%
Spam a�acks Спам-атаки
0%
6%
0%
Неnot бувexperience жертвою Did cyberbullying кібербулінгу
27%
56%
29%
14%
23
13%
29%
1% 3% 3%
36%
14% 13%
CYBERBULLYING: FORUMS Insults Образи
36%
•
Forums generally have a higher percentage of Погрози Threats intimidation directed at LGBT and HIV activists Залякування In�mida�on
•
Gender equality activists most commonly face «Black PR»піар» «Чорний insults on forums
Insults Образи Threats Погрози In�mida�on Залякування Blocking yourвашої ac�vityактивності Блокування «Black PR»піар» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Не Didбув not жертвою experienceкібербулінгу cyberbullying
Blocking yourвашої ac�vityактивності Блокування Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Не Didбув not жертвою experienceкібербулінгу cyberbullying
LGBT ac�vists Insults Образи Threats Погрози
18%
In�mida�on Залякування Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity активності «Blackпіар» PR» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Did Неnot бувexperience жертвою cyberbullying кібербулінгу
HIV ac�vists 30%
18%
Insults Образи Threats Погрози In�mida�on Залякування
3%
LGBT ac�vists
Insults Образи 18%
Спам-атаки
28%
9%
Spam a�acks Did Не not був experience жертвою Спам-атаки cyberbullying Did not experience Не був жертвою кібербулінгу cyberbullying кібербулінгу
18% 18% 3%
Threats Образи Insults Погрози 6%
Gen
О
9%
Threats In�mida�onПогрози Залякування 0%
П
18%
In�mida�on Блокування Blocking yourвашої ac�vity Залякування 18% 6% активності Блокування Blocking your вашої ac�vity «Black PR» 0% «Чорний піар» активності
In� Заляк
Блокування Blocking you активно «Bl «Чорни
0%
«Black PR»
3%
«Чорний піар» Spam a�acks Спам-атаки 0%
Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Did not жертвою experience Не був
3%
45%
HIV ac�vists 39%
Insults Образи 30%
Threats Погрози 18%
«Black PR» Spam a�acks«Чорний піар»
3%
Gender equality ac�vists
9%
In�mida�on Блокування Blocking your вашої ac�vity Залякування 0% активності Блокування вашої Blocking your ac�vity «Black PR» «Чорний піар» активності 0%
3%
1% 3% 3%
28%
cyberbullying Did кібербулінгу Не not був experience жертвою cyberbullying кібербулінгу
0% 9%
50%
Spam Спам
45%
Did not же ex Не був cybe кібербу
CYBRBULLYING: YOUTUBE AND NEWSLETTERS •
•
YouTube and newsletters have the highest rates of absence of cyberbullying
YOUTUBE 25%
22%
4% 4% 1% 1%
Are mostly used for entertainment purposes, so the level of cyberbullying is low
42%
Insults Образи Threats Погрози In�mida�on Залякування Blocking your ac�vity Блокування вашої активності «Black PR»піар» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Не жертвоюcyberbullying кібербулінгу Didбув not experience
NEWSLETTERS
13%
19% 3% 1%3%
61%
Insults Образи Threats Погрози In�mida�on Залякування Blocking your вашої ac�vity активності Блокування «Black PR»піар» «Чорний Spam a�acks Спам-атаки Не Didбув not жертвою experience кібербулінгу cyberbullying
25
INSTITUTIONS RESPONDING TO CYBERBULLYING •
Cyberbullying cases should be reported to cyber police/police (58%) and nongovernmental human rights organizations (51%)
•
LGBT activists see the need to report to the cyber police (68%), while HIVactivists (43%) and activists for gender equality (63%) say such cases should be reported to NGOs, human rights organizations
To police/ cyber police
58%
68%
36%
48%
To NGOs, human rights organiza�ons
51%
46%
43%
63%
Other ins�tu�ons
31%
36%
36%
19%
To media
19%
18%
7%
26%
To interna�onal organiza�ons
16%
13%
14%
26%
To court
15%
18%
14%
11%
To the office of the Ombudsman
13%
11%
29%
11%
To rela�ves/close friends
12%
13%
0%
19%
9%
9%
21%
4%
To Prosecutor’s office
MOST EFFECTIVE WAYS TO PROTECT FROM CYBERBULLYING •
The most effective means of combating cyberbullying in general are complaints to the administration of social networks / online platforms, where a violation of rights occurred (59%), as well as educational work offline about the danger of cyberbullying (37%
•
At the same time, 26% of activists point out that they do not see effective means of combating cyberbullying
to administrators Скарги доComplaints адміністрації соціальних of social networks/online pla�orms мереж/ресурсів
59%
63%
50%
56%
Просвітницька робота в оффлайні проти Educa�onal work offline against cyberbullying кібербулінгу
37%
36%
29%
44%
Немає дієвих способів власних There areзахисту no effec�ve ways to protect yourправ rights
26%
25%
36%
22%
Repor�ng law enforcementорганів agencies Скарги доto правоохоронних
27%
25%
21%
33%
Appealing to Звернення доmedia ЗМІ
26%
30%
14%
22%
Позов доto суду Claim court
11%
13%
7%
11%
27