March 31, 2010
www.gfb.org
Vol. 28 No. 13
PRODUCERS SEEKING CLEAR, CROP-SPECIFIC FDA RULES Agricultural producers told Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials that one size will not fit all in the agency’s on-farm food safety rules at the Produce Safety Project’s Stakeholders’ Discussion Series, held March 25 in Tifton. The growers want rules that are based on level of risk, sound science and address all segments in the food supply chain - before and after harvest. The rules, producers said, should also vary by commodity. In what was billed as a departure from previous FDA practice, the discussion series gave producers a chance to communicate their concerns about the food safety rules for the farm, which the FDA is developing and could put into effect by the end of the year. Officials said the FDA in the past has implemented rules on other issues and adjusted to stakeholder feedback after the fact, but FDA Associate Commissioner for Food Protection Jeff Farrar said the agency wanted to get the input first before proceeding with its food safety regulations. The meeting, held at UGA-Tifton’s Rural Development Center, was one of four such town hall-style meetings staged by the Produce Safety Project at Georgetown University. It included breakout sessions on irrigation and foliar contact water quality, composting animal waste, worker health and hygiene, and wildlife and environmental concerns. It was attended by more than 100 stakeholders ranging from small farming operations to UGA researchers to multiple government agencies. Most agreed that more information is needed and that cost sharing should be implemented. “There just isn’t enough research out there,” said Scott Horsfall of the California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement. “We’re putting way too big a burden on growers for testing.” The sessions on irrigation water quality underscored the complexity of issues related to on-farm food safety. Discussions centered on where water samples should be collected, what those samples would be tested for and ways to achieve affordability in the testing program. Currently, producers pay for water testing, which often costs more than $20 per test. Producers also pointed out that while construction codes are in place for wells supplying drinking water, there are currently no clear standards for wells to be used for agricultural purposes.The FDA is accepting public comments through May 24. For more information or to offer a comment, visit www.producesafetyproject.org.