October 30, 2013
www.gfb.org
Vol. 31 No. 44
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE BEGINS WORK ON FARM BILL The farm bill conference committee held its first public meeting to discuss the House version of the farm bill on Oct. 30. The 41-member committee, which includes Georgia Rep. Austin Scott (R-8th Dist.) and Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R), was established to resolve differences between the House bill (H.R. 2642) and the Senate bill (S. 954). The committee is comprised of 17 House Republicans, 12 House Democrats, five Senate Republicans and seven Senate Democrats. The 2008 farm bill was extended by Congress in January but expired on Sept. 30. Without a new long-term farm bill, the federal government’s farm policy reverts to permanent law from the 1930s and 1940s. American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) President Bob Stallman wrote to the conferees on Oct.15 expressing AFBF’s position on a number of key provisions. These include opposition to arbitrary means testing when used to determine eligibility for commodity program benefits, as well as payment limits from those programs. Stallman voiced the organization’s support of a provision in the House bill that would prevent states from enforcing unscientific standards on imports of commodities from other states. According to a report from the Congressional Research Service, the House and Senate bills both would eliminate direct payments to farmers while revising and renaming counter-cyclical price and revenue support programs. Both bills would reauthorize various disaster assistance programs. The two bills have means testing and payment limits for commodity programs. The House version under consideration contains a provision that would make the new law permanent law and repeal the 1930s/1940s laws. The two bills also reauthorized the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), with some key differences. The Senate’s reauthorization is for five years compared to three years under the House version. Both bills restrict how federal heat assistance recipients’ benefits affect what they receive under SNAP. The House bill includes a number of other SNAP provisions, including expanding drug testing for SNAP applicants and time limit and work requirements. The Senate bill would reduce farm bill spending by $17.9 billion over 10 years, including $3.9 billion in cuts from the nutrition assistance programs. The House version would cut spending by $51.9 billion over 10 years, including $39 billion from nutrition programs. The Senate bill would cut $13.9 billion in agricultural program spending while the House bill would cut $12.9 billion from farm programs. Visit http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43076.pdf to view the extensive side-by side comparison of the two bills and current law.