October 9, 2013
www.gfb.org
Vol. 31 No. 41
GFB POLICY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETS The Georgia Farm Bureau Policy Development Committee met at the GFB headquarters in Macon on Oct. 7 to consider about 360 resolutions submitted by 73 different county Farm Bureaus across Georgia. “You are charged with giving serious attention to all these resolutions and putting them into a useable document for our voting delegates to consider,” said GFB President Zippy Duvall. “It’s important because we take our legislative positions based on the policy this committee helps to shape.” The committee consists of 30 county Farm Bureau presidents, the chairmen of each of the 20 commodity advisory committees and the GFB Board of Directors. Three county presidents are chosen from each Farm Bureau district, using objective criteria based on how recently a county has agreed to serve on the committee. Based on the number of resolutions received, the main issues of concern were water, renewable energy, wildlife management, the farm bill, health care, and taxes. Most of the water discussion centered on provisions in legislation (SB 213) still pending before the Georgia General Assembly related to the Flint River Drought Protection Act. While still wary of endorsing additional authority for EPD, the subcommittee tentatively recommended easing GFB’s positions on agricultural irrigation withdrawals. Other proposed changes pertained to GFB’s renewable fuels policy. The subcommittee encouraged more research on renewable fuels, but said that production and use of renewable fuels “should be entirely market and consumer driven and not required by subsidies or fuel blend mandates.” The group reaffirmed GFB’s support of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL). However, the committee recommended that COOL regulations should comply with the nation’s trade agreements to avoid problems with the World Trade Organization (WTO). Several resolutions were received from county Farm Bureaus regarding the Affordable Care Act, and none of them were positive. The committee recommended the act be repealed or not funded. Several resolutions were received about selling unpasteurized milk for human consumption, a practice that is currently illegal in Georgia. Despite some support in committee to allow the sale of raw milk for human consumption, GFB’s dairy committee opposed changing the law. The subcommittee agreed with the dairy producers. Some counties submitted resolutions calling for loosening the eligibility requirements to be included in Conservation Use Value Assessments or the Georgia Agricultural Tax Exemption. The consensus was that both programs are working well and are not in need of changes. The committee will meet again on November 4 to finalize the policy document.