God Save the Queen News lets you celebrate the Jubilee in style Printed at Westcountry Design and Print
MONDAY 3RD JUNE 2002 / FREE WORD 724
Inside GRiP: A bring their caffeine-fuelled rock to Solus
gairrhydd CARDIFF’S STUDENT WEEKLY
Critics take swipe at NUS over new card Mark Cobley reports THE OLD NUS card that we all know and love is to be scrapped, if NUS officials have their way. Under new proposals the NUS card will be replaced with a new ‘swipe’ card dependent on registration with NUSonline. Students will only be able to use the card if they register on the website, providing personal information such as name, date of birth, course details and email address. Critics fear that this information will be misused, since every purchase a student makes with the card can be logged and matched with their online profile,
providing information about students’ buying habits and possibly leading to commercial targeting and aggressive marketing by associated companies. The cards will also replace the old up-front discount with a complicated system whereby the full price for products is charged at first, and then refunded to students’ accounts later. Paul Leake, Durham Students’ Union Treasurer, said, “We’ve only just been told about it – why weren’t we ever asked? “It will cost us time and effort in having to ensure we can effectively distribute these
“The scheme is manoevering students into investing in companies SOMMERVILLE for NUS’ benefit” SOCIETIES ANDJAMES UNION SECRETARY
extra cards as we currently have a joint Union/ Library card which the University administers. Several Unions look set to refuse to give them out,” he continued. The deal is rumoured to have been steamrollered in by ITM, the company that runs NUSonline. ITM has seen its value plummet recently as the site has not attracted the hoped for number of visitors, and some critics claim the new NUS card will be used as an attempt to salvage the ITM deal by forcing students to register on NUSonline. The deal will also mean that the discounted money is effectively invested in the NUS and ITM until it is passed onto the student. Cardiff’s University’s Sabbatical officers have raised their doubts about the new system.
The new NUS card would be swiped through till points
Societies and Union Secretary James Sommerville said, “NUS are using their guaranteed membership and recognisable brand to gain
market clout. If students don’t get discount straightaway that’s a little unfair. It’s manoevering them into investing into companies for
NUS’ benefit.” He continued, “Cardiff Students’ Union is considering bringing in a separate NUS card for Cardiff students.”
Breakdown in communication leads to second exam farce of the year Anna Hodgekiss reports SECOND YEAR Language and Communication students have fallen victim to the University’s second exam blunder of the year. Candidates sitting the ‘Describing Language’ module were thrown into confusion upon reading the examination guidance, which wrongly instructed students to answer all the questions on the paper. This conflicted with the module lecturer’s advice, who had informed them that they would only have to answer two questions during the twohour examination. There was chaos in the exam hall as the problem was queried, and it eventually
emerged that the lecturer’s advice was correct. Around forty students were involved in the incident, the majority of whom followed the lecturer’s advice and only answered two questions. The invigilator’s report details that the problem was first discovered five minutes into the exam. Despite the invigilators having the module lecturer’s mobile telephone number directly to hand, the member of staff was not contacted. He had remained in his office throughout the duration of the exam should problems arise, and the department is still unclear why he was not immediately contacted as the situation could have been
rectified within seconds. The exam was frequently disrupted with invigilators receiving scraps of information, causing distraction to students sitting other exams. The Language and Communication students, particularly those who attempted all six questions, are extremely worried about the effect on their grades for the year, accounting for 50% of the overall degree. Professor Nikolas Coupland, Director of the Centre for Language and Communication apologised to the students involved saying, “At this point we anticipate it will not be necessary for students to re-sit the exam. We
have given assurance they will not be disadvantaged in assessment in this area through this very regrettable error”. Staff at the faculty met with students last Monday, and informed them that the department is in close contact with the Academic Registry and following their advice. No final decision has been made over a re-sit, and the paper was still marked. Students were told they would be ‘compensated’ for the trouble caused, especially those on the borderline between grades and were no doubt comforted to know lecturers had ‘lost sleep’ over the incident. Continued on page 3
“I can’t see how Cardiff playing in the Superleague can ever be financially viable. The Superleague just isn’t self-sufficient” SPORT EXAMINE THE SAD DEMISE OF CARDIFF DEVILS P40 News p1–5 ● Letters p9 ● GRiP 11 TV listings p23 ● Features p31 ● Sport p39