Xuefei Gao CORE I Selected Work

Page 1

Three Projects XUEFEI GAO

2022
Harvard University Gradaute School of Design

Xuefei Gao

+1 (470) 955 4612

xgao@gsd.harvard.edu

M. Arch I Class of 2026

Harvard University Graduate School of Design

Selections from CORE I

Critic: Hyojin Kwon

hkwon@gsd.harvard.edu

Grade: High Pass

In the three projects of the first core studio in the M.Arch I program, I have explored a variety of approaches in architectural representation, design methodology, and developing architectural projects to form a more solid foundation for personal forays that will follow in the following years. While Cooking with Deckers reinvents the program of the triple decker housing typology into that of a co-living between a culinary school and resident artists, One Wall, One Corridor suggests a radical spatial arrangement of two individuals through the sharing of a single wall. Gable, Gable, Gable challenges the canonical Raumplan and Maison Domino typologies by masking their union with figuration. The exceptions of each project illustrate architectural restraints have led to the discovery of unexpected formal, programmatic, and spatial solutions that suggest new ways of living.

2 3

Cooking with Deckers

In collaboration with Patricia Ku

Renowned chef Julia Child opened her home in Provence, France, as a cooking school. She chose to house her program, Cooking with Friends in France, in her very own home, because for her, the kitchen is not just as a space for cooking, but a space to do things – connecting and sharing ideas. Our re-imagined set of three triple deckers on 91 Topliff St. Dorchester, MA 02122, brings this philosophy into the neighborhood of Dorchester. By subtly altering the core elements of the generic triple decker, our new typology hybridizes the domestic and commercial kitchen into a living hub shared by the resident family and visiting chefs, where both communities can co-mingle with each other. This project further proposes a radical way of living by giving generous space on the ground floor to the public by opening the bottom, and the footprints of each decker move from more public to private as they are staggered in five-foot intervals along Topliff St., with each footprint increasing in correspondence with its program size, creating a gradient of more public to private spaces from south-to-north along the site. Their long side constitutes a self-similar set of fronts that act as gateways welcoming the public into the site, which gently welcomes visitors to pass underneath the first floors of each decker, transforming into a shared community garden on its descending terraces. Meanwhile, residents of each triple decker enter down a flight of steps along the sides of each decker. Through the elements of room, stair, and corridor, we have introduced a scalar relationship between the institutional and domestic.

4 5
A view of the other two deckers from the back, connected porch of the culinary residency.
7 6
The west facades of the three deckers, with a view of the shared gardens and entrpoints into the site.
i. cook gather topliff st ridgewood st ii. genevaave 1/16" = 1'0" b aa
8 9
3/32" = 1'0"
This pagee: Original (given)
Opposite page:
Photograph of the site from the intersections of Geneva Ave. and Topliff st.
triple-decker plan.
site plan. 1/8” = 1’

The island kitchen dorm: Located in the most public decker, this kitchen is completely contained within what would normally be a traditional triple-decker bedroom or dining room.

The one-wall kitchen studio: Located in the most private decker, this kitchen that belongs to the visiting chef flanks one wall that merges with an open living and dining space.

The galley kitchen pass-through: Located in the middle decker, this kitchen occupies one corner of the single-loaded corridor and activates the living and dining space transversely.

The L-shaped kitchen library: Also located in the middle decker, this kitchen occupies almost the entire top floor, feeding into a commercial restaurant storage area (dry-store, cool-store, and batterie de cuisine) from the decker to its left, and a rooftop vegetable garden from the decker to its right. The kitchen is grounded in the center by a large dining table and joined by surrounding bookshelves and lounge chairs, creating a selfsustaining “space to do things.”

10 11 Ground floor, second floor, and third floors of the three deckers, per row. From top to bottom row: the southernmost decker to the northernmost.
Top: Sectoin illustrating the institutional kitchen size of the southernmost
decker.
12 13
Left to right: Photographs of the decker from Geneva Ave., the institutional stair, and sloped public entrance into the decker.
14 15 Top:
instituional and
Sectoin illustratingthe
domestic stairs in relation to program.
Left to right: Photographs of the decker from the perspective of the Pizzzaeria, and from Topliff St.
16 17
Top: Sectoin illustrating the connection between the institutional programming of the third floor in the northernmost deckers. Left to right: Photographs of the most private and public deckers, and a close-up of the facade of the southernmost decker from the site.
18 19
Public entrypoint from Topliff St into the site from the middle decker. The interior hallway of the middle decker with the lartists’ rooms branching off.

One Wall, One Corridor

Perched on the legs of the circulation system, the duplex named One Wall, One Corridor addresses an artist’s and photographer’s need for complete privacy and a single, shared common space through a flexible boundary. This boundary erodes the visual connection of its two inhabitants through a row of flora on the ground floor, concealing the separate entry points from one another. Morphing into a single, thick wall that divides private living spaces on the first floor, the boundary then offset to produce a double-loaded corridor, expanding into a shared terrace. The notion of a flexible wall stems from J. Hejduk’s Wall House no.2, where visitors must enter through the circulatory system in order to access the living areas; this wall is structural but impedes visitor’s sight of the habitation spaces. The first resident—an illustrator—enters through a set of stairs, while the second—a photographer—takes the elevator, their visual registers of one another other are interrupted by the soft boundary of plants. Both residents land on the same floorplate, which contains their bedrooms separated by an impenetrable, thick wall. Both residents continue onto the second floor to access their separate workspaces, the artist with their studio and photographer their dark room. The logic of extroverted and introverted spaces is preserved, but there emerges a third, exteriorized space inbetween the two of cohabitation, where both the artist and photographer share moments of communion.

20 21
A view of the quarter-scale model from the bottom of the incline. The elevator-stair legs and photographer’s two balconies are depicted here.
22 23 Opposite page: ground floor plan. This page: section BB. 1/8” = 1’
24 25 Opposite page: first floor plan. This page: section AA. 1/8” = 1’
26 27
1’8” = 1’ This
Opposite page: third floor plan.
page: artist and photographer using the shared mezzanine.
28 29 The north and west facades removed to reveal the stair circulation on the interior. invelectat
30 31
The stairs and artist’s space revealed. The artist’s entryway, room, and photographer’s balcony revealed.

Museum of Gables

This investigation conceals—rather than unifies—Adolf Loos’ Raumplan and Le Corbusier’s Maison Domino as canonical drivers of spatial organization. Instead, the logic of complementary programs—a museum and classroom—can be read through a language of figuration in both plan and section rather than the rigidity of the two given sections. Here, a five-sided polygon figure is introduced in plan that begins to complicate the seemingly incompatible given sections. Forming rooms, corridors, and circulation sequences, the plan consists of a family of three similar polygons, with each smaller tower representing the locus of a museum and classroom program. Visitors of either program enter a nondescript entrance of the main polygon, then into the museum on the fourth floor. From there, they can circulate the museum or classroom spaces via a set of wraparound stairs that take turns depositing visitors into separate programs on alternating floors.

32 33
The outer shell of the quarter-scale model expressing the polygonal, figural language of both plan and section.
34 35
The facade lifted, revealing the disparate polygonal stacks makkng up the interior organization.
36 37 Opposite page: Raumplan section. 1’8” = 1’ This page: Maison Domino section. 1/8” = 1’
38 39 A
closer look at how visitors would occupy the museum spa ces in the quarter-scale model. The movement of visitors is registered on the exterior via the polygonal apertures.

This same polygonal figure is repeated in section to form the same polygonal figure in periphery, then exteriorized as a set of gables on the roof. The façade and roof acts as the ultimate act of concealment, a shell of colliding gables that hints at one of its programs but masks the partto-whole relationship of the three polygons. From the exterior, the Raumplan and Maison Domino sections are reduced to but an instance of the totality of the form, concealed by a rigorous logic of dynamic polygons in plan and section.

40 41
Left to right: Ground floor plan (entrance), second floor (museum exhibition), and fourth floor (reception) plans. 1/8” = 1’ Interiors would include polygonal forms on the ceiling, and even in the objects displayed.
42

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.