% % %
" % % % # !% % $ $%
!() ) ! "#) % ) ) ' $ ) & )
`}×õŮ ¦öł!ŢŮ œ §ĞŮ#ØŐ BŮ j¨ij Eíğ ÊŮ ŮŃË Ů ďîĕ ©ŠŮ ~ŔĴ Ù$%ŮÿÂŮńÌªŮ ūĐĖ ! Ú Ů IÛ êçĀÅĠ ė %CŮ Ę.Ů ÷ ŕ «ĵŮÜ š Ů o ÍÝŬđęÎġ¬øÞ )QŅßā ĂÆţ kĶ Ģ Ï Ů [ ŮYıĒŖĚŮÄģŮ Ů ¡ř ù ®ï¯ ņŮ ÃŮi Ť Ðà Ň"ť/ŮKăðñ Œ#° ŮĄúŮl±ķ² Ĥ Ů |Ne_aDŮ Ů ³ĸ´ ĥ ò ňÑą¢Ĺ0Ů6Ů Ů2 Òáŭēě Ħµûâ *¶$ãĆéćÇŦ Ů {bŮ 739Ů <:8^Ů
&pJ'Ů 4+A?>;5, @ -=
',?/ 6DCD D @D 7 D 3*<-D +0D8 D > # " &;D( D 4A 91BD " "
D $!)%D .= 2 D 5:D
!" " !" " " ëìŮ ħ ÈÓʼnĺŮ "·Ļ¸ĨŚ¹£ Ů f Ů Ĝ IJőŮ Ĉ ŮŊÔäļŮ ĉèŮ ó ŧŮ Ů ĩº Ī ¤ŗ ¥Ů ŨŮ üũŮ ĝīĊ »ĽľŮ Ŝ Ŀċ¼ś½Ĭ(Ů ŝåŋÕ Ř Ů Ů Şĭ Ōō¾ Ů ¿Įô ŀŁæČýŮ č ŮŎÖÀŮ Ĕ Ūį É ŏŮ ĎşþÁİ1Ů cF xWGLsymROŮ\ ŮtZSŮzg wTPŮqu vUrŮhXŮ dVn]MHŮ
CN ¡z,vk ¡O ¡#-#P .$¡ l¡ C/¡a-bm{ ¡n<¡ \A 0$¡ ¡ d oe ¡ ¡ Dp¡"pf |Q 1%¡ q¡ E2¡&3 4]pwc5g ¡r=¡ FR ¡}6wp~ ¡ g S^ GT ¡ '7 H¡ Ug¡ w V^ ¡ _¡ ¡ 8¡ Isx7¡ H ¡ JW ¡ %7(X Xth¡ p K p¡ F9¡ Y)9 ^ ¡ p>¡ ¡ i%¡ p¡ LZBM¡ h% * ¡ u?¡ 9 : F¡ X 7@`9! 7+¡[j¡ EX ¡ ;yu
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE THE GROUP FOR THF. ADVANCE:'vfENT OF PSYCHIATRY has a membership of approximately 300 psychiatrists, most of whom are organized in the form of a number of working committees. These committees direct their efforts toward the study of various aspects of psychiatry and the application of this knowledge to the fields of mental health and human relations. Collaboration with specialists in other disciplines has been and is one of GAP's working principles. Since the formation of GAP in 1946 its members have worked closely with such other specialists as anthropologists, biologists, economists, statisticians, educators, lawyers, nurses, psychologists, soci ologists, social workers, and experts in mass communication, philosophy, and semantics. GAP envisages a continuing pro gram of work according to the following aims: 1. To collect and appraise significant data in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, and human relations 2. To reevaluate old concepts and to develop and test new ones 3. To apply the knowledge thus obtained for the pro motion of mental health and good human relations GAP is an independent group, and its reports represent the composite findings and opinions of its members only, guided by its many consultants. RESEARCH AJ\'.D THE COMPLEX CAUSALlTY OF THE SCHIZO PHRE:\"IAS was formulated by the Committee on Research. The members of this committee are listed on the next page. The following pages list the members of the other GAP com mittees, as well as additional membership categories and cur rent and past officers of GAP.
vii
ŦӕȠȡ̶ĦıĸIJġ¨Ě ŋҚӖħóưղ̷Աĵȳ̸Ēijē ɴЍ %ӗĈ± ĢĬĭͪճюЎ²Ƿկ ³şυ ҅ӘӍִ Ȣ˔մյO´ , [ ÉÄoÊÞµ¦ą ą1"ą4\§ ¨¶ ąE vúąW·Ë ą BY X#ą Ǐ_? Џնәқ ɔ ƣ͕͖רµ ȴͫחʵӚ уC я¬N ɵϲͬԲ҆˕Ҝ ŧ ƱͭА ֡ ͮБҝD ǐ%Ϟϳѐ˖Ҟ͗ ¤˗Գ ¶ѧѨ ˘ԴԵo ˑ ƿ˙͘ԣ˚%ѩѪͯ* ƕͰҟͱאէ.Ũӛ Ӝ ȣВ̹ϴ˛φ ȉ` ӝϟͲ aф%շ· KwûąʶӞԶ ¸ ȵ ʷ ũ(˜Էз͐ͳ ˒Q Ȋʹո oҠh˝ֿ҇ ȋ͵טʸӟԸ .ȶ ʹ Ɩ5ԹͶх 2 ύխ¹ŪϵГ̺˞Ϡ)ºǭ
AVą
źĤˍĪҁǚʖʗĠĥĽŻֵķǮčʘİĎīɪőǯďɜɽ˂żǛǨŒʙɫ˃ œ ͠>r` ȍ ƛω(ϩ˿"ӾÍ Ƚ ˄ נӿՌ K ǵˏ ˅/Î d ÐÆ Ñæ °ą ƨ̀͡סՍ͢Ƹ WԀ֊ Ï Ҁ© м ́ͣ͒ѲԫЄФ̂Ð ɝ̃ ƩՎ̄Ȇĺĕǜ °ňՏ|ϓֶн֫ЅN ҂Λעǝ̅דΜҸ ŽԁҹҺý M tÒ¿ąQò Ă ą ?ÀóçïÁ± ąT ÿ ą ǿԂІ ɞ ]ХΝϪΞ~+ʬ ѳַ ̆Ҏ Ȫ֢֣̇ ɬԃ _ўl !ʭ ָՐԄ̯Ñ[ Ցԅ ͤΟ ͅΠ ɭ Ѵî ȀԆΡ̈ˆ ҏ̉Ґ)BԇÒȖԈŔ H ž џ&ϔ0
ūģ Ĵȏˊñdzȅ¢ȃ¥ʊńôсɇȷŌǀǤŊǴǁ ŅͷĮįƗ ϛĻ=϶ҡE ɧӠ̻}בz ѫͺ» ǥ͙/¼ 5 ] ÝÅxÌß ©ą Ŭ ˟Ժ @ I ą ®ņˠД׳־F Ǒӡ ӢҢ½ʋͻ ץ YˡיԻͼ ̼ͽ Ʋ ǂԼ̽͑ӎё5ЕϡϷ¾ Yӣչ SңϢχѬ;պ¿ ŭfѭиuĖ ɨӤiͿԽ֥ĉ˓ ȸˢ ˣҤõ ɕxЖ ˤ͚ђ ϸЗ˥+ ɖ ǃr Ծϣ DC*ą ɗӥ ~ ̾ц Ů И̿˦ϤӦ Ѯ ö ą ^ öyĀą Ȝ Oðn ª ą /züą>_÷{« ą6 ¬$ą Ƴ ůӧ שԿջʌϹ;҈ԤռӨ ÀǸը S֦ b҉bÁ DŽ˧
ŰɈŀĹȤǦʍʎǶƤɉªűǒȐʦǹɘɶʺŲǧǓōʏɩʻ L`ñ¡ąG%ą 2ra¤à ą<b¢ø|áí¸ ąR}þ& Ĩ 7- c Íù~Îâ¹ą Ǻ Ҋսȥ T΄ ѯ*ų˨ ˩˪ҥ Ȍʼ ǔ˫ өךƘӪҦˬ ͛ƙ ҧAӫ C ȹ΅כʽ ՀчG Ⱥ ʾ XӬվ ԥϺ ƴЙտ̀ϻϼӭϏ VΆB łѿКk ǻԢ֤·ԦϽˋ ϐ ¯ŇՁ# Â3 ͜Лր ҨHʫМց÷ ǼӮ ƵO2́ƚΈӓӔӯA à Ȅթ Ǖ;ҩӰѓ׀єׁ,ǖ˭לˮ Н ǽׂϾҪɷ͂Ͽӱ˯םѕ֧ >ÄZ מǗ˰גΉҫ ӲҬҭ ʐxΊӳ͝ӴՂɸЀ˱ԧ&Ճ<K Łpןʿӵ ш ȝˀø əΌ >ʑ˲ ϥת˳׃Å ȑ ւ Ŏ Ϧψ q@, Ŵ4іОϑĊ ȒΎҮӶՄΏƶùƓċ ʒΐՅՆÆɹ˴ү ƷՇ˵Ұ̓{փժӏÇ ŵ˶ї8t
ŶӷȦȧјˁĩ£ğӸձ ŷӹȓȔƥDžƼ1ɺұĶҲȻʓĝ F ®îąČƯ Pºk ¯ã» ąS¼ýä½ ą Z s' ą 8 Ïå¾ ą \)̭Α ֨ȞR ŏ Ӑք ҳ ǘcҋ"Β < Ҵ ʧ4Ոl Š˷̈́щׄ@ ȕ˸ǾӺ9 ˹IŸ Ѱйϒ ! ҵ U ȟкԨ ״ÈŹЁ˺ԩΓ ǙП ѱ ĞÉ ú 3˻љ cЂʔӻњԪРҶ ȼӼ :d Ê šհ С ΔJ Ȩ˼ օ džћ<ՉТ ɊҷԯׅΕËɥл ֆj׆Պϧ Ì ɚ Ʀ j Őׇh\7 ͞J gҌiՋУmϨΖ- ȩ˽ և Ƨe ќΗɻ ѝ̮Θ Ι ֈ Ń͟/ ʕӽҍLJûɼ֩eutΚ ˌʨЃ ֪5ɛ ˾& ։üZ ˈ
@ Óāą U(ą =Ôô²pleõ¥ ą0.f mÕ u q ąJ èé !ą 9 g ÖÇ ×ê ą ʮþ ɮԉ̰6Ւ ŢΣ̊הΤՓ֍DƜ̋ѵ9̌ÓLʚΥצ0 ; ³ą ăHą 3 Ø h´Ąą Քוо͓Օ =һÔNi)ą ȗΦΧſԊґ̱ՖЦҼ͔эïLj ̍Ї̎Ғ ɟЈЧѠfͥϊѶԬ${̏Õɠ̐ÿ ǩ̑V ƀ Ш͆}ÖĿ͇ˇףԋъ× Ⱦðˉ WՙΨm6 '͈ lj ֹֺ ЩΩ̲ ȘԌ֎ ŕҽvϋ Ϊ Ø Ɓg пϘė Xԍ֏#ԭy ɾ͉̒ҾÙɿ̓ҿ ƹ՚̔ ͊Ъ͋ ÚƂ ѡzώĀ
ƃɋȫːǪʛʜƪƫɌʴNJɍʩƽ1ɳÛ«ʼnȬ҄ȿʝŖǫāÜŗƄșɀƅȇ1ʀ 'ѷ Ы̕ғ ʪ̖ ʁֻԡ L ̗[ ŘѢ֬Ԏ Ɔ̘ |ϕ , ÙÈ Üì ą ȁ :7 ɡPƇ̙ Bp ѣÝȭԏ ֭# ΫF3֑֒̚ ʂЬͦӀάʃ NjԐ ͧέӁÞԑЉӂ Ȉ ^פԒ՛ыE ^ ¡ ɁaԓҔЭǞήѸѹ6 Gʯ̛֓ЊЮ v֮ -ƝĂƈP ɯԔϱ ՜ɢίΰ q-ʰ̜֔Ћ Ӄϫ ԕ M ƞ.Ɖ
ƊɎȮ҃ęòDzʞʟƾƬԖ ǟˎ ļƟ Ƌřɣʄ ă ɂ;ծҕ̝ ɰ ţαիӑ֕֯β&ӄ ƌ Я̞͌Ϭ ßǰ (Ąà :£ą+j Ú Ûëà ą 2γׯs՝ʅQnjӅְ$s՞áƍ$8͍̟ϭԗâDZѺѻą TδA װɦεϖϗ͎՟̳̠Җã Ǡ= ֖Ԙ äʠζקå ʱ'Ѽ а̡җ ǡ ʆ̢͏ Mɤ ՠֱ( ӆ"æ ɏաηϮR ʲбѽ в̣ҘŚ ʇԙӇг֗+ Ťθ ι֘"̤ç ͨ! ǍκԚբw#ʡ̥գт̦ӈ Ț ֙śӉwλ9ό֚ ̧ ѤдϙĘ ʢyԛ:d ǎ ʳμ̴ ֲν Ќ' ϯ ӊèƠ Ǝ Ǣξ լױǣ դьéťο π̨֛ͩê! n
ƏɐȯȰּ¦Ѿ§ đϝěĔɑľѥɃʣƭĜɄŜʤѦɒɅŝֽ ɱƮțŞʥǬɓɆʈ ƺ ̩ kр֜ƻĆU Ӓ ֝ Ɛ 7֞ ײזρë ȱn I Ƒ ̪еեԮς?֟) ɲԜ̵σ? Ȳ ơԝզӋì̫]4ҙτ Ԟíƒ 8Ϛ0 Ȃԟ$ӌʉ Ȏ̬Ϝ * ֠ ж ϰֳԠ ƢćƔĐ
ʳך
! ! ! ! !
êƑ֪͢˚ ͣךǬϦ˛҃աЅ˜ ĝ ךƮ˝˕¥*Ԧæϧ . ךȈ_ԳԴ?ך ǝҶϨ ךƒ ךMZ͆в"ךŕϩͻ 2!բ ך$čĒz ךȉWԵԶ ך ɕ գ˞ךɖ ךɗҷϕͼԁ 6ךɿҸ҄˟͇҅ͽ#ךŖˠ pϓך 9 ĘʼnijtàŠ M(Š` ·u±²ã ę Šåֆ 5 ךlüĚÕ Š W)r Š Š /gĴ3 ¸ Š: Š a¹vä³Ò Š hŋ Ķýå Š 6ěÀŚ Š ʝˡԱІг ךƇ ךʞ ̵҆«ךŗϪX v~ջռ;Է֚Ч Ϳ ךʟˢ ך
ŘȲȊĤēĔʀǞƯךҹĪ ךȋơǚưřĮǴךƓֈ֛ŚįʁǓĬрĠçĚך ƈˣ֜ ͤ ךɘ ךƱˤ֫t ¬ךśϫr͈˥ϖҺךLJс ùäך > ÁĜĒ ĝ Š Ƨ҇ ךİ̶ԧ̱/Ը ךı3 ѱһ ךɀ˦ ך bł Ő æŠS ŠJŌ þő ÖŒ ŠK çœ Ğ Š?ÿØĀ Š ɭ˧։ ךǔ ךƲ˨Ԃ Їՠ ךIJ5 ҈҉ ךijԃ̷Ҽ 7 ךȌЈ͉Ϭ ך Ƴ˩ѲЉͥ ךǕCךǵЊσ ךɁϭ+ ˪ͦμ ӱmЋ˫® ךɂˬëך @ ğāÙŠXw Ú Ăè Š ăķŃĄé Š2ŝxĸĹ Š ƴ΄Ԅ̸΅ փEךѕ¢˭3ͧΆԹ ךəҽ`д ֝ךі ·¯ךȍͨ ך Ŝ̲Ԩ -ֽҊךŊ ךɚҾϮЌҋѳ° אդ ± ךʧˮ ²o Ҍϗեҿҍ ךƉ>ŝ ך cńIē º êŠA Šd  Ġ Šiō ĺąë 7ġÃś*Š ɮЍͩҎ ך־ȅךʨ͊ tѴ˯ҏ: ךƊΈ ֞Ήԅ³ ךŞӀ Ӂ ך kŊŔyŠ OP.Š pÄáì0¡Ģâz Š Ş¢ŖŠ mĆģ׺Š Y n Š
ŦĊˍĕˑéǪʌʍƗĈךȶǫךɈ ʺŧNJʛġ˔ʎɞ˒£ךĺĢƋך Ũӑĥ լȔũȦխʏʻך ǢӒϷҜ ךĻòךʐ̃ ̽ӓ =ך%ĭČֳךʼӔԓй ך%@ʽ Åך D¼ Éĩĕ¦ûñŠ RċòŠ Ƙ ךEŏ ĵ ó Š T§ŘÊô ¶ņČõ!Š ß1 ļĽ+Š ƽ ךɟЙ͖ϸīЩԔ ךǶ̄ĖėĘ̾ ךǷӕÆךļ{Ϟ vΣՄ ךŪ̅ Ъω ך ǯΤҝ|Υ ϹךĞȕ Ҟк kώ ךɴӖѺdԕ֣ e" ךѮύ̴ ך ǣӗϺҟ ךū ךĦ͗/r\ϻ;ךŐӘՅծәҠ ךȖ̆ՙ՚ ך Ľы ֹ̇ҡͰΦԖךɵ ךɠӚϟִ̈Նл ÇךǸӛՇךľҢϠοџΧՈÈ ךŬ̉-Кχüך ǩӜ 1˘ ךɶ͘ϼֵ̊̿É ךǹ ֍ЛՉ֤Ы ΨÊ ךǰך ׀ ŭϽ̋ԗ dՊ ךő ךʯ+ьмМ ՛ӝ ךDŽ}Ջ̍ՌךŮНկׁËךȗӞ ך
ůȷȘșNj ʚƙƚךȸȧךɉɷʾŰƾnjĿʑɡʿךŀ§ѠѡךǺŁʰך ǻ ԘΩң ךƿ ךɢ հϾ ךɊЯԮEՍ̀֎ԙϡϿÌךɋ ךטű ̎ ӾĀć©CĆĩ¨ѻך Ɍ̏Ԛнך HО ձך ŲЀ̐ԛэ ֏͙Վ֥ Ѣ͚< ךʥ̑ ך K ЁҤ ךƌ Ϊѣzׂ ך$̒ԫցψӮԜͱÍךųӟҥ| ך ɸΫ׃ѼӠ ךȇ ךǀ̓ ά͛оóךŴo̔Ӷfx ךǁs . ךȨ ƅ ך ŵģЬԬю ךɍ˙ ךѰ Đ̕ ѽӿ֑ПՏя#ךěª+Ҧҧ͜]ӷӡyРՐÎךĜ ך ǂgԝ́έԞղךŶ ךM ͲwЭ}ÏךʒӢӸήп̖ ךDz&ҨՑ ך Ǥӣҩ̗ ךɣ ךɤ̘ eӹ ւ ךG̙ Ǽ Ѿ ԭίÐ ךN ך U ̚ѿ ךȹôךʱΰ 4 αѐ ךǽ*ֺ ҪϢճӤҫ ךdz֦ ך
şӂדԩҵǖTTƔךȳȞךOƕȟʂĴЎ ךƵהĵȂ ǗʃǟךɯƢ֟וĎ͋IԺך ƶΊԆך ɛ ךɰӲЏ Ӱ8 ךȎp-֬˰!,( ךʩ Ի ´ך B {ÓIJ £ĤĻćíŠ Ķ ї]Ґ ךŋ͌qϘf µךʄ֊͍ԼӃґ¶ ךķ Аך ˋтΌ ј ךʙ ךƖ˱զӄ27 ךȴѵYϯ˲·ךȠa̹ ך ǧ Խӳϰ ךʅ ךƣì{ϙyБԾϱ ךѬΎ֭ךʴ ԇе#ךȰúʵ ך ˖èǜí ךʪZ уΏԈ ךNb ҒϚΐԉ ךʆӅӴΑж˳¸ךǭ˴1 ך QĈ ¤Š 4q ĥÅ|Še îŅÆ}µ Š jŎïĉð Š8ĦÇŜ Š ʫ Ш˵Ѷ ךȆךUΒ̺̻¹DǨ ąºךʇӆ֮ԿӇ »ךȏ îך ƨΓӈԊϛΔ ךք¦ ךʬ фՀӉғ ךGν хΕ ךȐ ˶ ךȡǠ ך J˷͎uךĸ ךʭ wϑӯԋͪ ךɃВսվ ̼ԌϜ ךɄX ך
ŷȺˎבτȚυʓʔϊĂƛךċ ךיɎɹˀŸǃǍłʕɫˇ ךŃȩƍךɥƜȃǙƫǎȻȪך ńё͂͝ԟђDK ךǾ!̓ Ҭ=ךʲӥӦ g9ךŹ̛.СϋăÑך ź ̜ТԠגӺ͞ԡՒӧ ך ɺմÒҀxׄ͡ ך$>ךŻ&յlÓךŒπ /Ө04Ô ךĨѤ̳՜՝õך Rqͳҭβךׅƥ֒ öǏǿ ךœ ҮֻÕ ךȱ ˁך ך _Ë ½ Ī ŠF Š U¨ŗÌ "ŠZ©s'Š N ŕªö#ŠGč Š Ɲ̝ ѥךŅ ךLөӪҁ Öךǥ ×ךF֓ϣ֙՞ն̞ØךƬ̟ך ħɓԢշУđүγԣ[ךľŠȀȼˏː <;ךīĎ÷ř Šę˓¡ ךo,Š żѓʹ׆δ ךɦ ךS ͵ׇԤÙךņɏȽÚ ךϔ ˂ ך ѯєФ` ̠ρѦ ךɧ ̡ˉ ךεՓ ךƭ jζ ֶ ͟ЂÛךŽ Ұ1 ך
ŠĉזďȑLjʈʉǛ@Iךȵğ¤˗ךPևƆʠѫĄחʊцʡƦךɅɱʶšƷljĹʋɜʷך ɲէΖӵϲΗҔךƤчΘ͏з¼ ךȢΙ֯ ךƸ˸֠Κ0½ךŢӊҕҖ ¾ך C»~ÈħĔ ¥Ĩ Ċ Š ƄûךǮҗГϝlըךFшͫԍД͐ϳ9ךţϴW Ӌտր( ֡sљ Λ: ךʢ˹ïך ʣЕ ˺ךʮ ךŌΜԲ˻Ԏͬ¿ ך%(ְךʸӌԏuÀ ךȣ ʹðך ǡщ) ךʤ ךŤӍ iѷ[ ךȤ ֱ ךƹ˼֢b ךť Ҙҙñך ɳթ˽Қъ*ֿךǘB ךƩԐcΝ0Ձ 'қÁ ךō) ϵcՂͭ˾ ךȒ ך VЖњ ˿Ѹ ךƺ ךƻΞժѹΟ͑,͒ 6ךɆmЗ ̀ͮξћ ϶ ́ ךɇ^ ך Q ͓n' ͯךƪ ˌךќӭԑԒ ѝ ךŎӎ իӏ Ãךȓ& ך Ƽ̂Ԫ ИՃךŏ ךPΠ͔иÄךѭ ΡֲךɝӐ͕n ў ;ךȥ? ך
žȾțбօԯ ʖˈāƞךȿȫךɐɻ˃ſDŽǐŇʗɨ˄ˊךȬ ךǑȭƎʜɼʘɩ˅ך < ĬĭÍ«Šf ŠLĮ¬Î°´ Š ďĿŇĐø$Š V ŀŁ %ŠH ÏįĖ ù5đúŠ \ň®İŠ Ȅý=ךıÔÜÝ&Š]¾ÐÛ ¯Þė¿Ñ Š^ -Š H!̢ ךɔ ךDẓ̌Ϥη Üךɽ4þךȁ ֔ Ք ךȜ֕Aך ɬ ךƟͶַ̤ԥ ךdž֖kϏ҂̥ ÝךňՕ h֧ ѧѨθÞךȮ ƀ ך Ə^֨ ͷךƠ÷ךOӫ Ֆ ұßךɑ̦ [ոХ àךǒ ÿך Ɛ̧֩ ךŔ ךɪӬ̈́ͅ ՟8 ךƁЃ'ӻӼ̨Ԁ֗Y ךȯøˆ ך Ƃ \ iҲ͠ι ךQ~ָ " ךRչB ךɒ̩֘ѩ ךȝЦ2ҳ ך Ǧaφϒ3)ךL ךɾӽjѪ κ á ךʼn λּ̪Ҵ ̫ ךʦ̬ ך J Є ךV̭,hϐаς ͺâךS̮ ̯պ ϥ̰ã ךƃ_ ЮόAך
3
" " " " ! "
Ș¦˩ #3 ؽǟ ؽǑ-ӟԠ§ ; ؽFЄ ɮ̗Νѳԡ ЅɯW>; ؽđؽ Ĵɪ ɰҟ ؽdž ؽj̽ ̾և2ҠÑ ؽȹ ˵ֈӠҡÒ ؽņԳІļ ؽ ș׆ϟؽt ؽkЇ̘ĽÓ ؽɒ¨ӡ ˪ԴЈ ςDÔؽţ©Ң ؽ ǢɱԵЉ˶ ؽƞ] ؽǒЊң ̿Ҥ&<ؽϠЋ ɲ̙ΞѴQ Ќɳ&< ؽɴ ؽ =̀σ ҥɵї̚ؽȤ ؽǓӢ%ԶЍ ÕؽŤÉÖؽؚسťEɶ¹͂×ؽǣ̛ ؽ ɭ˷ԢT ɷ ؽȚ ؽǤɸƤ˦ձ v ØؽƨwփC ؽŦ ¾؛X ؽu ؽ ƾӣ ؽŇ ؽǥɹ˸l̓Ӥ̜ ؽŧЎҦ˹ЏҧҨɺ¿ ؽǾϡ/©ؽ k̈́ªؽǦɻ̝ӥ؆ ؽȆ А v ͅјԣ Б Xؽȇ? ؽ ŨϢɼղ ։ؽň ؽ:ɽ Ӧ ͆ ؽũ ͇Ο ɾ ؽǿϣВӧؽ ȥГ̞ҎĿÈؽÐغ8ؽľŀδ˧ԷτӨ ДҩÙؽƌ͈  ԸĐ ؽŪөL ;D ׇԹؽʼnĒؽń҆@ճ3.Ҫ ؽ9 ӪӫҏρфΠѵ ؽưп ֊Y ؽ:Е˺Ϥ]ؽ bц͉ؽǧ>ÀOҫ4 ؽÇ˻ÃؽɚӬԺч' ؽēɛ ؽ Ŋ ؽǔª "½ؽɫεմƩɿ³ւ؝ÚؽƪԻ͊{3ؽǵ-˼шZؽҍ^ɜ ؽ c ʀ ؽb *ؽBǕ͋ʁҬ ҈ ؽÉ͌Ãؽɝ«Լщ ҉ ؽÊؽuؽ ɇ ɬ ̟ؽѶ̏ҭ̠̐ љ ) ؽ0./*( 3 Ⱥ͍ؖÛؽ * Rؽ؞ƥĬ ؽǨ ԽB͎SÜ ؽǶ؟ʂ˽ъÝؽǷ ɞĔؽ ĥLJP Үؽƙ ؽʃԾ ЖÞ ؽs ֍FЗ υ3¬ү ؽƍ7Ɗīؽ Ljԗ͏׀Ԥϥ ؽƎ( ؽǸӭ֎ϦԥGدY ؽr@֏ϧHҰφ¯שұ ؽƏĕū ؽ ŬϨxԿ ΡؽȈ ؽȀËŖ´ Ҳß ؽȉ И ʄ, њԦϩЙʅ4 ؽ+y ؽ ǖؽ˾ׯƐ ؽȁذwՀК à ؽŗ T ̡֑ʆáؽ ̢*ؽ ) քzՁ̣ ؽƺĦ ؽȊʇB͐ {â ؽǹ͑؇ؽɟӮՂJã ؽǺ ɠ ؽ ɩؽԞվMʈҳ ؽǗ ؽȋ? ћ ؽǘ͒ؗ.Ҵχ¿ӯҵä ؽ:ʉ֒֓ ؽ *ʊ³ؽ ƚ^ؽȌ͓ՃыЛӝׁå ؽȦʋќ͔Ґæ ؽɊA ؽ ŭϪʌՄ ºؽd ؽȍ. ̤-ՅF%ψϫ͕֔ç ؽ9͖̥ζԘՆ! ؽǩ|֖֕Ėؽ Ƒ}М, ؽҊ ؽțʍҶʎʏ ) ؽΣ֗ נ,ʐèؽǪ ؽ Ʊʑ´ؽؠ͗ǡĭ ؽ3 =֘͘¡Iь ؽŮӰѷ ͙ω ؽ,$ 3 ! 3 ɓ8 ؽƒ± ѝ̦= ؽӱ֚֙ ؽůH¢˿ ¡ʒНéؽȂϬ «ؽ Ǚ ֛ #ؽh( ؽȜ ̧ê ؽŰϭО̀ʓϊӲ ؽƽɉ ؽ ƫ͚ӳ¸ϋ͛ؽƛ ؽȝװηθë < ؽПў ͜џԧ Р~ì ؽȎʔ(ؽ ƓʕVС̨ ؽp ؽpʖ ̩CՇ֜í ؽǚ¬֝ ؽŋ0ό ֞͝î ؽű Тξ ؽ Ɣ2ҷʗ ̪ƿ ؽȧ́ #ÅZؽŘ·ԙӴэ ÄҸ& ؽҋ`شɡ ؽ i% ؽIJ ؽȨ̂ Ѡ֟͞Уҹ ͟Ոïؽȩ ؽƠ$ʘ ̃Ф֠̑ԚðؽŲʙ Хιħؽ ųϮʚյ ֡͠ؽȪϯʛύʜ¹֢ñ ؽȏϰ ѡʝ Τ Ԩϱ. òؽȐʞ ؽ ŌѢ˫̄Չ סlj ؽȫ/ѣ͡ՊґAҺóؽd£ ؽōՋˬӵՌôؽıصÆ ̅ ؽ ǀ »ؽ ȬЦҒ2 ؽř͢#юΥ ءõ ؽf? рκĨؽ Njͣһ ӶҼ ؽɔ ؽqMЧ öؽԩŅ̆Ս ӷҽ ؽ ǻ ɢ ؽ ŚͤҾ֣Ӹ ؽȞ ؽȭ ̫ͥآՎ ؽe ғ˭ՏШ̬ώͦ ؽǫʟ֤»ėؽ ƕ Щ ؽȮP֥я ֦ ؽśʠ ʡؽŴ أ؈ؽ÷!ؤ+ʢ_ؽ ǁͧʣҿ ͨؽȯ²% Ѥ2̒J4 ؽɕʤº Ъ£ϏאӹӀ ؽƖ_ŵ ؽ ŜՐʥӁ ؽבơ ؽqؽ' ͩגƗͪӂV $ ؽŶ°ѥӺĘؽ 97" 0 ,1 = = 8 ; (5 = <= -2& = =
Ŏ ʦӃؽc ؽȰדNӄ ؽeʧMˮ$ ̭ϐͫ ؽǬʨ֧֨ ؽ ȟӻ˯ Ց¾ؽƜ ؽȱ؉ ͬرהՒ ؽȻ# Ӽ֩ ø ؽȑʩ ؽ
ȒΦնՓؽإŷ ؽȼʪ ѐ 0ϑ؊ӅùؽƘʫѸLʬ֪'ؽȽͭؽ ؘ ƬRxϲʭҔ&ؽŸ ؽȾʮئKӽՔ ؽȿӾµNӆוӿúؽŹʯӇʰ̮ʱؽ ŝՕ ؽͮ̇اɀͯҕԪ Ͱתԟӈû ؽȓ IѦz!ΧѹQE ʲę ؽѺÌʳĚؽ +ՖDחזع̔̓ػüؽɐɑěضؽĵطϳԀҖ²ؼԁӉ 9ͱ ͲշעԂ ýؽȃ ϒ7ؽ ǂԃ֫ͳԫ ؽȔ ؽɁױԬЫ þؽȲʴ̈~օʹ¢קĮԄ ؽźʵѧHλ ؽ #mQ_ ) t`J '4a u5bEX}Cn 6YUP ƭ 1͵ ؽj ؽɈ֬ 0ÿؽǼͶ؋ؽȄµёʶ1ׂ ؽǛʷؽ ɖʸՙ$ͷӊؽɆ ؽɋ ײϓϴʹ NJտ ؽoԅ՚טѨʺؽɌʻ ѻؽ ب ŻʼϵίĜؽ ȠԆ˰$Uؽȳ ؽɗʽѼ ͺ՛֭ĶaͻЬ¤Ā ؽȴʾ¥ ؽƢ՜ʿ ̉/̖֮¨āؽżˀѩ ο ؽ cFvK ( .+7 ~rd ee 2wBo / VDR )¶ةˁķĸ ؽיŃĹ ؽsͼ̯ϔ Ăؽɘ˂¼ ϕÀԛ¤ ؽ3 ǃԇ֯ ԭ϶ ؽҌ ؽrϷͽΨѽ،S ϖϸUăؽnj̊ӋךμсΩѾ ؽf˃ѪЭνĩؽ ȡ®Ϲ R ؽרǠ ؽÏɍЮLѿЯ˄җְĄؽƲԈףֱ׳Ԝӌ ؽɂ;ؽ ؙ &8 Z * [Lx 0,W\ f M SN G9 %H ȵϺ̋՝ت؍ĺĻ ؽnĝ ؽəԉԊ̰½ ؽǜ®ֲ ؽŏӍ Ϳ ֳ ؽŽ@Ҁтΰؽ ؽ Ǎ ؽכŐ ؽɧ" ҘC՞ҙ˅ \ؽŞ ՟JΪ ؽ ثžˆ`ؽ ƻ׃ՠˇ ؽɨ؎ Kаӎϗ ؽȕϻбѫ ̱҇̕Ԯϼвˈą ؽoˉ ؽ lгӏa ؽǭӐոӞֆִؽ ſĞ ؽǎӑдϘϽTؽőѬ̲աе̌Ͼ ؽgϿˊչ ԋÁ"ֵ פѭK΄W ؽɎˋ ؽ ş պ ˌբ ؽȢ 1̳ж΅գ[ؽƀˍҚ˱դI̴ϙΆ5 ؽn ֶ¼ğؽ 1 :^ Oy ;{ pg "<| ]=hI - ƶˎӒؽƉ ؽŠ·ր зΈ ؽƁN ظץѮؽƮˏ˲ ַĆؽƦ ː ؽ ɏ"Ԍ }ؽtĠؽšΉ yե ć ؽΊ؏ ؽɣ¯զђ6 ؽɤ7ؽ Ǯ¸״ջ|ÄؽŢOؐ ĈؽƂЀΌؽجƃЁˑָ ؽɦу̵ ؽ
ĔſĊƍıОƀĿО IJ!$ķĠƣƁƎƘО
" ,#-$; Ş̀ʕ˿О Ģ ОŽɌ˯1DŽ О ĖɍόʖО ŘL΄Džʀ О ŐDω ͶʧϡȀ>О ¹_˪ƃОėGʹ́˄ˍʨ̀ɎОċ`Жɏ́ϭ+О Ę͂ηύĈaО Űdžϊϋ О ²³ ̓О
) *' 5; ŎɅ ЅО ŏ О Ƭ̼8О × О ņˌɆ˻ОȃJͰ̽9О%Cǀ)О ĕɇ ʓɈεȭǁ[О ŮȮ О · è Е О
$ 'ɒΆώОč·̆θϏɓ ̇О őɔ̺Ψ ІО Ěγ͵ι7̈О ĤNJI;О ƄО ˮNj δϮ± О Ƹƪ ОƹƫnjʗɕΈОƵ˞ȩ̉̊0̋ ʍɖΉО ƅɗ̌ ЇОƂϣϤȔ̍'ɘΊʎО ěəϥ ЈО Ɔʆɚ˟RʇOȱbǍϯ О ƺ ɛЄЙϐ̎ȲūƤОƚ О Ɛ͆ʏǎϿ ˅1О
+ 2! &6 9; 7; ůОʤ\ʔǂɉ:О ƏƿО ƶǃ ɊζО ˬȯʋȐϽ ̾ȰОij ʥ]ɋО TÿȑȒ˼Ͼʦȓ.^О ġ̿˽˾ О Ëé¸ О ƙʁȨFɐˎ̃΅qД Č˝ϢLJ̄О ęɑ0ʌ,NО º Оĸ:ОģLj˰ ̈́О ĹLͷlj̅ͅˏО .yaV pE
ĥcȔκϰːˑǏ̐ϑО ˭˒ɜΌʩˠˡОƥ Оĺǐϒ͇BО
:. 38/ 0; Ħ Ǒβ˫ɝλО Ĝ О ƭ4˓ˆ2̑μ͈̒О Ì Оľ О´µ̓ȳО ƛϓΩʂɞϔО ŧǒ̔νǓξОħʪϕЉdО ű͉ О Í¾О˩ êО
Ų5ȕʘ&ʃ@О% ОƷǔ>ʄeО Œɟ̻KЊО ОƮ͊ˇО
( 1 ; % 4; Ƒ͋ȄɠJϫО ĨǕ˱ ȅɡ =О Ňɢ͌G-ɣО œ О Ƈ͍<ˢ͎ȖˈО ϖ 2ЏǖȆȗϗʙО Ď О ƒɤʫ(О ĩǗϘ͏ Ћ̕О ĝ О Ɠ͐ȇʬ̖EЀ3ϙАО
= /:3 .)= *!'%6# = 4 +$ = =
>i? $ !@zj qkT r sl 3 A ȶÁ QЂΎ ؽƣѯΏ̍ѓĉؽÎΐؑ ؽƳ  0'ؽƄ¦ ¥ ؽ DŽ °қΑؽƧս˒ӓє[צ ) ؽ/Ҝԍէ ؽįƷ̶ ؽ + 1 3ȷ8 ؽ- " 2 3 ' %& 3 ǯ ˓! ؽ# 3 Ɲ̷ؒ˔¶̸ؽijġؽh˕ ԯ ըĊؽƅ ΫVάҁ Ӕ̹ ؽȅЃиؽ ҂Í>% ؽƟ( ؽƴ ֹלԎӕ ؽƸԏؓ ؽg"UحċؽƹԐؔ˖ؽ ǰ˗թϚ˘SΒ ؽםDZ ؽm˙ؕժΓ ̎ ؽ+ԑҝP1˚ ؽǽ ɥĢؽ Ƶ˛ռԝѰ̺ ؽƼ ؽǝйΔα6ؽȖ G ˜!Εѱ к˝ ؽȗ˞ģؽ Dž̻,ؽDz ·ҞOիČؽmԒֺؽŒ ϛέ ΖֻčؽƆ˟ лπ ؽ Ǐˠց ؽœؽ ؽİĪβ-Ӗӗм Ϝ ؽɃ§Ա ѕˡ5ؽi Әּ ؽ ҃҄Ηլ˳ΘխؽמƇ ؽdz±̼ н 6ؽɄԓԲΙі˨\ ؽǐˢәֽ ؽ Ǵˣ˴ ؽȣԔׄؽ ׅȸӚؽƈ ؽ خןŔծоزĤؽ ƯΚԕկϝΛؽɅˤհхAӛĎؽǞԖؽ־ŕӜϞή҅Μֿ5 ؽƋ˥ѲGγ ؽ
ƈFɥοʭɄ̗ϚĉО VƯʮ?ˣʯǘ˲Оį О ųɦ̘̙4AʐɧΎО şǙȘˉО Ɣ ОĻЁǚ˔ϛО
WƜ͑;О ưfОňʰ̚πȈϱΏ-О Ư̈̀ǜО Ϧ О !qWz bx @ ОИ͓̞ʚ XЗŴǝΐʱ̜͒О ļ О Ũș˕̝О Ŕɨ ΑЌОƱ ОĞΪͱρ О Ŭɩ͔О О ğǞ ϧ ɪ˳*ʲɫ О ƕ͕ȉ*ΫϨОƝ ОʼnǟΒȊɬΓО ŕɭΔȋɮά О İ О ĀƼО͖ȴОřОʳ̟О Š͗ʛ̠О ̡̢͘ɯ ˤЍО Ŋɰ͙ΕʑɱОƦǠΖ˂ạ̇̄О šϲȵȶО ŵǢΗ˴͚ΘО Ţ͛. О Ī О ŝɲ˵5ǣ О ţǤȚˊО ē О Ʋ͜ ʊͳΙȷО ƖϳȌɳ̤О ƳgО ŋ ȍς͝AО YŤǥțˋО ƴɴ6̥Ȏɵ ʒО Zɂ ȧ ǿψ ɃО
î¿ tÀ О ïs¡hĆi¢О ƽ ĄrťuÁÂО ŚОðÃÄvÅØО £ñÆÙwÇòО ¤ jkó Î¥О ¦ôϧxÐ»О ¨PāГ ÑÈО ƾýÔК ÒÚО ÕÛ ÓõО þÖö Ü©О ÷ݪ Þ¼О «øß½yàÉО MùåÊ æçО áâ ãúО ¬ûä zë О üì® í¶О
ABc P ",dr#1osF6{ ď˶ɶΚ7ȜǦ̦О ī ǧ ϜǨȏ˖ɷО ŀϴ̧)О ŶΛ Оǩ̨ȸОЛ{ʈέσ О ŷ̩͞ʴτОĐΜ̪͟О Ĵ О Ǫ̫ȹОĈˁK О ƗʵȺˀȁΝȻО đ̬˷О ŸǫϵH6ȝɸО ŁǬ 8О Źɹ(ʶȞǭ<Оł϶BȼО źΞυ О ĬǮήE=ОŌ͠˗ȽО ōίͲϼɺОƞȟ D͡˘О G|} $ Q> te 7~ Ŗ͢˙Бʜ+ʷ˸ɻΟОŃϷ̭ȾО N f_ g X3% HhY _/ #Πφ О Ē@˥& О Ŝ~" О ũǯ ˹ϸχО #ǰΡ ̮О ĽО О ŪϝϞ̯ƻSͣΰϩ ʝ |ƟDZDzʞО ƠЂʸʉϪО i Z4& Jj[ !̰Ƞ О М˦Ȫž,ʹ˚О ƉʟdzΣ˺ǴȡȢϹΤĂʺȣǵ˛О ŻɼΥȤ9ОơʠǶHОQОĵͤʡ ɽО ăżɾΦΧʅ˧˜О ĶͥЃО ƊʢН¯̱̲ǷαąƋϬ ŗʻȥǸʣćlО ŦО̳ȫ О ƌ/3?˨ʼͺ mОńͦϺ̴ȿǹϟʽ̵ͧО ƢǺ̶ɀͨВnО " ȦО SI C RM\8 90OT'_ ĭͩIͻͪ°}Ȃŭʾ̷ͫО ƧǻͼͽǼ̸oОŅͬϻ ɁǽϠʿͭ pО ś Ȭ О ƨ/ɿО Ʃ;˃ͮ ̹ОĮͯ ͿǾ ЎО (] U:uJ?;^ k _5) Kl` _2 < D *-mv+ nwL=
TABLE OF CONTENTS Statement of Purpose ......... . .... .. . . ............... . ......... . . .
vii
1 Introduction ................................................................
3
2 The State of the Field ................................................ Genetic Theories ........ . . .................................... ....... Theories of Aberrant Psychophysiologic, Perceptual, and Cognitive Function ...... .. .............. ........ Biochemical Theories .............................................. Theories of Aberrant Psychologic Development ... Sociocultural Theories ............... ..... ... ...... ... ..... .......
13 15 18 2I �4 30
3 Examples of Interdisciplinary Cross-Domain Research ...................................................................... 35 Assumptions .. ... .............................. .... ............ ......... 35 Selected Strategies ................................................... 37 4 Approaches to Cross-Domain Research .................... 45 A Biologic Research Study: Metabolic Abnormalities and the Schizophrenias .................. ............... 45 A Family Systems Research Study: Family Systems and the Schizophrenias ................. ..... ........ .... .... . 48 A Psychodynamic Research Study: Symbiosis and the Schizophrenias ...... ............... ... ............. .......... 51 A Longitudinal Research Study: Child Development and the Schizophrenias .............................. 56 5 Implications for Treatment and Training ....... ..... ....
63
6 Conclusion ... ......... ........ ...... ..... .... ..... .... ........ ..... ... ..... ..
67
References ....... ... . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . .. .. . .. . . . .. . .. .. . . . .. .. . . ... ... .
69
Index . ..... ....... ....... ..... ........... ...... ..... ...... ...........
81
xv
$H rʒ ȗ˵ V˵ : ˵ ɲ ƥ˭ b Ŗ rɳ˵ ú*ŗɊÆûF %˞ä˵ ò ˵ ˀĤƎ˵ É Ð ˵ɴ"Ž ɵʓ ˵G<üF˵ Ə ˵ ʔ ǯ XƦ ɶ˵ Ū˵ Ɛ e ˵ŃƧɷȬɍń » ˵ C ˵ě Ä ˵ ĥ¸ Ƚ'ÇNǰ=ˮ *˵ ¡Ș˵ ʕ ɎȒ ˵ ȭ ˵ I >&DZ ˵ ː$ [sODz ˵ ʖ ʗ˵ 6 ˵ T˗ýȓ¢ þ ƨ ³˵#Ʃ ƪ ˵ ˵Ĝ Ⱦe˟ĦƑȮɸ ħ.ÿ%˵ VɱĀȔ ˔ ɏǮå˵ ïș ˵ ɹƒ ˁ1Ņ˵ · ˵ ˘b Ĩʘo˵ Źɐ˵Ř˙5 ȿ Ò˵ ʙƓ ˵ ?ĩ@f Ó˵ ɀ ˠĪ ȯņˡ t ƫīƬ o˵ ˵ Y °ƭ ˵ ʚ ˵ ɺ Ç6Í˵ &ɯ Ň˂ J ȋK˵ Ɣ ˵ ʛ ɻ˵ ˵ ; ˵ ,Ʈ˰ m Ɂƕɑ /Nɼ˵=A˵Ư! dz ư A˵ ż ˵ Ɩ˵ FƗ q˵ ó ˵ɒ ȌL˵ L˵ ˵ H ˵ ɓ ʜ žƱřɽ˵ āÎ˵ É Ț˵ Ǵ ˢ˵ ňˑ ˵ £ ˵ Hț ɔ *Ʋ p˵ ô ˵ º" Ƴ Ag˵ G: ˵ R ˵ P ˵ Ă77ɕŚɾ śʼn˵ gʝ˵ bC Ŷ ĝ ˣ˵ Ğˤ˵ 0 9ǵ ˵ Ŋ>ÃĬ\ɂȍǨ ˵ ˵ +Ȱ 5¤ f˵ $¼ ˵ )ɰ ȱ˕ c˵ ƴȜ˵ ÃĭȲBŜ˵ ʞƘăȝ˵ i< ˵ z uŋ ɖ˵[ɿʀ˃ ˵ ū˵#,«};˵OƵ Xƶ|Ô˵¹ LR ſ]|Õ˵ ˵ R/ Ƕ˵ ( ɗÑ Ʒ5O1ŝ Ö˵. ˵ ɘ ×˵Ą Ş˵£ȞÌ (şŌ˵ Ƹ ˵ʟ ˵ Ƿȳƀƹ ʁ˵ V˵ʠ: ˵ʂ l n Ƀ,ə ȟƺ ʃæ˵ í˵ Ǹ˵ ˵ I ) ¡ K˵ ˄ʡ]ǹ ˯ƻ ˵ Ƽ @ƁZ ʄ˵ ų¼ ˵ °"%i.ɄǺ ˵ ō ˱ ą/ ˵ƽ ˵ɚĆ½ũȎ˥˵ɛ Ųȑ Įʢ +˵\ ˵ - ˵» Z˵ǻ ʣ ɜ ʤId p˵ ðÆğ ƾ - *˵ ʥ"Ŏ]Šg˵ ʦƿ k ˵ ʧ ˵ ŷ įi˵ t˵ 2 ǭ C˵ &ƙ ^ ˵ ˵ ǀȠ Ǽ â+? m ¬¹®ǁ ˵ c˵ʅǂ Ƃ® ã7 2ć¥ ˵ɝ ! ,q˵ùƚ Y ¾˵ź H ƃ˵ ˵ "˲ c ǃİvǽØ˵ Ê ` 3 µ ǾÙ˵ ˵ ę2DŽ%Í˵D˦D D˵( / zǿTDÚ˵Ä˅ı,˵ "ŏDž !˵IJ A ɞ F˵ű *dž ʆ˵ _ ˵ʇij<.lȻBƛ ȡLJ}ʈ˵Ĉ Ő˵ Ĵ n jɟ Ȁ˵ ȴk& ˵ ĉ ˵?Ŭ˵ ˵+ Ċ¤ ʉ˵ \ʨ d˵ ? ˵ ʩ˵ ˚¦ ʪ˵ ˵# ˵ W˵ ǩʫʽ` ˵ !=Ƅ . ǪĵċȢ ç˵ õ; ˵ ˛Ķ ɅʬLj ³ ˵ ȣ˵ Ÿ ʭ˵#0 ˵ ˒ Cm § ʮ[ ˵0 ˵'; ˵ ˵/ ˵#Ɯljķ-˵ő ŵ ˵Ês NJ${ ˵$ ˵ Ð ɠ è˵ ø ɡ { ˵ W ±˵ ˵ 6_eĸ=Ɇȏ ˵ ČK˵ Q ˵ !ʯˆ ˵ # ' ˵ ɢ8 ǫȤ Œ˵ )´œ˵Bɣ8ĹNj 8˵j ĺƝȥȵȁaƅnjšʊ˵˖ Ţɤ8wʋ˵ w~ɥaʌSa&ǍS˵ j S ˳ µǎºˇţÅ˵ č¿Ť˵ ˈ U ˵ ʰȶ˵ ȷȦ Ǐ ɦ˵ ȸʱƞ ɧ˵ ËĎɨǐďĠȂ Åé˵ îȹɩ˵ ˜xȕɇȃ Û˵ X T Ǒ ˵ ˉ7ǒ ˵ ˝3¯ ɪ¨ ˵ʲY ˵3ɫ ˓Đ Ļ ˵ W˵ ļ<Ǔl B- ǔđ˵Ǖ ˵ Ɔ >Ľ Ȑ˧˵ ÌIȄ À Q` ˵¥ ¢(ǖŔˊ 1ʍ˵¸ŭʳ ˵ˋ ˵ Ƈ:¯Ï˵! 3 ʎ ©˴ G +˵9 ʴ0 ˵ ˵ ^ɋˌ ˵ ˵ Ɵ 2NʵǗ vȅ˵2 Ȇ Ü˵ Pˍ ˵ ˵ y²ªÏ˵ľ ĒĿ ť½_f ǘŀ ˵ ˵ Z ˵ġ h¦h˵ ˵ ȇ Ģ$ Ý˵ Ŧ ˵ ʏˎ¿ ê˵ öƠU ˵ ʾˏŕ©ŧ ˵ Uƈ ˵ x Ë ȧŁ ˵ ǙȨ˵ Űu ǚ ˨˵ ʐ˩ ʶ ˵ 4 ē4 -˵'ơ ʷ˵3 JǛ ˵ ˵0 ( G«Ɖ ʿ ˵#ǜ ˵ ˵À Ǭ ˵ʸ n ´ǝɌÈ ʑ˵ Ů˵5 EE@ Ɗ˵ Ŵ @1M˵J ªĔP ë˵ ñǞ ^Ȉ dȉMÞ˵ Ě ǟ M˵ Ǡ J Ñ ǡƋĕ ȼ4 ˵ ˵Ż " ˵ § ¾ ɈǢ Ė% ˪˵ ˵ y ¬%˫˵ Lh' ± ˵( Q Ũ ß˵ ȩ ƌȊ łʹ 9˵ 4˵ ˬ! ˵ 4à˵ '˵ ģ á˵ ǣ6 Ǥ 9˵ ʺƢ ²˵ Î˵ È& ɬ > ¨ 1Mì˵ ÷ƣ ɭ ˵ )ɮ ˵ Ȗė¶K˵Á )EȺ E˵ ů Á˵ ʻ ˵ ~ Ȫʼǥ¶kǦ·ƍ˵ ɉƤĘ ǧ ˵ ȫ˵
)}ʮ \ ʮ Ɓĺ Ȏʮ Ƒ!ʮ ƒɎ ůʮ ǘĕʛʮ ĭ ʮ % hÐʮ Ē ƓȱȲʮ ŏʮ W ɳɴʮ Tã#Vè´¹ʮ ċ lʮ r-$ʊŞȏ nʮ ă ȳȴ6ɵɶºʮ A ʮĐ ǒƔ aʮ TʮÚ?ðq*lʮ ý % ȵʩ w ɺ ʮ Ǣ ʮ ąĖƕ Ȑʮ ²Uûñø*»ʮ ēɏȑė¥ȶȷ¼ʮ ČǶ fȸƿʋ½ʮ Ą0 ʣş;¾ʮ u Őʮ č AEʮ jH ʮ1Ȓ >¿ʮ ʮǷɐ& ȓ<ʮF ʌ ʮ ɻ <ɑ őʮ+91 ȃ Ļƈ Pʮ ʮʍĘȔIęx ʮ Ěǣ~ʮ 2S2ɒ ʮ2 Ǔ ļ Ɩ_ ÀʮĮ ɓʮ ɔ 2ʮƗb=ɼ6ʮ bʮ ĬȕʮƄ ʮȖŠȹ ǁg Ñʮ å* ;u*< I9J6 ^ ul; R\_ ; +;!uA u`' ua >],B=Sub# cu p-Tdu en > f$CU u o.g%u /h& Mu N D:0? ?i7qu 1E7I"5 uFOuJVr 'FWF 2 8uJ PXK j3m Yu Gtu k( u Z )4sHL(Q @1 [ u t& Ⱥʮ Ǚ1 ʮ P : ¡Ȼʮ % ȼƘ šȗ$ _ ʮ Űʮ ǚ Ţʮ Z (9 .ʙʮ ǛǸ 0 ʮ űʮ Fţʮ 2[ ƙʧO9 ȘŤ 4Ƚoʮ ć ʮ ě ș ǜ " ʮ ' /ʮĉ ʮ «ʮU#ò#µÁʮ¨ ʮ Ț Ľ ƅ ƚʤ ʮ3/+ ʮ ɽľ ʮ3 8c ʮǤ ɕʮ ʜʮ ƛȾʮ ĿƉĜțĝŀ ťȜƜȿ Ɲ|ʮ Ųʮ ʮ ɖ ;45ɗ ʮ x ɘʖ ʮ | Q 0 ʮ ȝ. Ğə ʮ Ž ]Pʮ ųʮ , !B Âʮ wɾɚʮ ʮzğ ʮ ɿ ɛʮ ǥʮ Ŧʮ Œf+ C ^ŧ" ʮ ǹŴʮ ǀǦ oʮ W !ʮ iʮÛ#õV¶ʮ / ʥ ʮ G ʮ ƃ ʮ N ɜʮ ǝīƾ ʮ ,'Ȇǂ'7 ʮ )ʮ zH C ʮA!ʮ Zƞ10J ʮ ʎ Ǻ9ɀÃʮ ʮ Ċ 8 ʮ Tʮp?óü*ʮ1 Iǧɝ ʮǻ¢3ʮɞ/ ʮ ʀ įM ǃ` ʮƟ ʮe ʮ ʮ$ ɹH Ka\Hȇǔƻ ʮ EN ʮ ʝ ƠŁʮȈ B $3ȞʞÒʮď.ʁ İ N ʮC !ʮ¬ Ǩ ʮ' kʮ fơɟĠ ʦ'" ʮ łʮ 9 S[Ɗ ɠȟʟʮ ıSʮ žȅ ŃƢǩƆʮ ʗʮ Ǟ R _œO O L6=ʮ ġ ʮ "ª M &ɡdÓʮĆ Ũʏ Äʮ ɢʮńĢǪǫǼRÅʮy ʮ ɣ= DŽŵÆʮȉ;OgI ʮɁʂ ż 5L ɷ ʮȠƣ%Ƌʮ ( 6 ɂʮ ǽEʮ ʮ [ƌ ʨ Ȋ : ǬƤu2Ï=ʃŅ&ʮ ǟǾ ũ bʮ : Ȍ¡ƥȡ ʮ ģ ʮ Jǭª ɤ ;Ŕ ņK XȢ ʮ ʐƦ ʮ ǿŶʮ ¦ Çʮ Ƨ Ň Ǯ ʮ ʑY K+IJDž cÔʮ đ ʠʪ , ƨY3ȣ Èʮ ŕ 8 ʮ ¨ 3 ʮ { 1 hʮ ōǕ B džʮ Ȥ ĤLJ Éʮ ^§Ƀɥʮ d ʮ ɦ ʮ ȍʄ Ʉ ' 7Ʌʮ G ɧʮ C ʮ ɨF ʮijȀʅ! ĥ Ʃ ʮĴ © 8ʮ ,ƪ Lj Ū<ʮ+ǯŖʮ } ($ " Õʮ tƍ Qʮ ʒƫ ʮ Eʮ ɩ& ʮ Ƭ! :\ƎAǰ -ʮ ĵū "ʮ $ʮ 5 , ljʮ Z L ʮ $ ŗʮ Ħʮ ĶħQƭňʮQ% 5 ʮ ʆ Ř ȭ JDZ ʮɪ Rʮ 5I NJƮ ʮ ř ʫ ɆʼnȥƯķ ɇʮ ʘʮ /DʮɫD Ɉư Dzʮ vʡʮNjDv ʮ ȁʮĨ ʓ ŊŬ ʮ ʮ £ ] ɬ ]ʬ Ƽ7 Öʮ Ĉ)ʮ F ʮ nj4 6ʮ p?éÙɉʮ ÿ4ʇŚƱ00ʮ ʮÜ?êù*ʮ dz śʮ ɭ ʮ Ǵ- ʮ ɮ ʮPɯ¤ ʮ ʔ Ȧ ĸ ʮ ſȯ (ʮ MƂ " ʮ~ (ĩ <ʮ <ʮ .Sʮ ȧ ɰ ʮ ʮ a£ =ʮ Ȃŷʮ Ə e/ʮ ʮ Ʋ Êʮ ʮ Ĕ ǖ ŭʮ ®ʮÝ#ëq·ʮ ȮȄ ¤, Ŝʮ ʮ ŋ`(ȋ hʮ ( Ǎʮ Ÿʮ Ƴ ×ʮs ʮ Ō ɸ ʢËʮā¥Ĺ ʮ¯Þ@íì¸Ìʮþ ʮ°ʮß#îúkmʮ ĀY ʮ ±à@ôï>Íʮ Ď c ʮ ³U#Væ*Îʮ 8ŝʮ W ƴ ʮ jä@ö÷>ʮ Ȩ ʮ NǵƇʮ G ʮ Ɋʮ © ʮ ƐXʕŮʮ ɋ ʮ Ǡ Dʮ { ʚʮ ʮ Źʮ ' d-ʮ K"ʮ ) + Øʮ Ă ȩʮ ) ʮ Ɍʮ s ! Ȱ ʮ r ¦ -Ȫʮ iʮá@çâ>ʮ ʮ ɍe: ʮ & ʮ Ƶǡ R %-ʮ źʮ^ʈǎɱL ʮg4;JĪyǏ.mʮ ƶ ʉ Ʒʭ ǐnʮ BǗM)ƽŎXǑʮ %Gʮ Ƹ7ʮ ƀ¢ȫ & Ȭƹ ʮ §7 . ƺ) ʮ `Żʮ ɲ ʮ
8
Complex causality of the schi:i:ophrcnias
schizophrenias. More recently, Scheflen ( 1981) has proposed the hasic structure of a complex model with which to un derstand the schizophrenias. An example of the application of a complex model to un derstanding disease is that described by Engel (1977, 1979). He proposes a biopsychosocial model of disease which derives from systems theory and considers a wide range of hierar chically organized variables in interaction with each other. This model not only calls for consideration of a large group of diverse variables, but also emphasizes their hierarchical interrelationships. Each subsystem of variables interacts di rectly or indirectly with every other subsystem, and disturb ance at one level may be contained at that level or affect all other levels. Engel suggests that the spread of. disturbance through many levels is a crucial factor in the development of disease. One problem involved in the use of such models is their level of abstraction. For example, terms like "positive and negative feedback" and "homeostasis" have great appeal for considerations related to the schizophrenias, but are dif ficult to operationalize or test, and disappointment has fol lowed attempts to use them. A systems approach to the etiolog·ies of the schizophrenias can also relate to the clinical endeavors of assessment, treat ment, and prevention. Such an approach can help the cli nician decide what to assess and how to combine variables in diagnosis and treatment. In a like manner, clinical infor mation is equally crucial to the success of a systems paradigm. Given the large number of possible variables and ways of combining them, clinical information should be a major feed back loop in the continuing elaboration of the model. The clinician's model of causality may involve at least two levels of complexity: one for acute, potentially fatal clinical events, and a second for other situations. When faced with a crisis as, for example, in patients with diabetic coma, acute myocardial infarction, or suicidal panic, the clinician must deal with the most pressing variables and intervene promptly
Introduction
9
and incisively. In these situations the threat to life is direct and immediate, and a simple, linear model may be most appropriate. The next patient seen by the clinician, however, may be an aging person with severe rheumatoid arthritis, an adolescent with labile diabetes, or a chronically depressed individual. In these situations, the role of multiple and di verse variables mandate the use of a more complex model of causality. The clinician's sense of certainly growing out of a simple cause-and-effect schema may be lost, but compen sated for by the greatly increased range of interventions pro vided by the more complex model of disease. The ability of the clinician to move back and forth between levels, as the context demands, both requires and reflects a high level of clinical expertise. It is against the background of these issues that this report is cast. Its primary goal is to encourage research efforts that clarify the patterns of relationships among groups of varia bles in various domains thought to be related to the etiologies of the schizophrenias. In pursuing this goal, we shall make the following assumptions about the schizophrenias: 1) The assumption of heterogeneity. This report assumes that there is a group of schizophrenias. Further, it assumes that the complex interaction of etiologic variables is different for different forms of schizophrenia. Each form displays certain characteristics that differentiate it from other forms. These characteristics may be biologic, psychologic, or social. The assumption of heterogeneity is supported by both clinical and research findings and parallels current knowledge about other disorders such as hypertension or diabetes. 2) The assumption of illness. This report assumes that the schizophrenias are illnesses, not alternative lifestyles. Al though there may be a risk that secondary deviance might be brought about as a result of the label of schizophrenia, this report assumes that the primary disturbance of schizo phrenic patients is a biopsychosocial reality. 3) The assumption of syndronie. This report assumes that the
IO
Complex causality of the schiwphrenias
present state of knowledge about the schizophrenias is con sistent wilh the designation of syndrome. Although the terms syndrome, reaction, illness, and disease often lack precision, this report defines syndrome as a clinical disorder in which there are certain patterns of symptoms, the etiology of which is poorly or incompletely understood. ft is useful, however, to keep in mind that syndromes are composed not only of those symptoms that various patients have in common, but also of features that reflect individual, idiosyncratic elements. Bowers (1974), for example, suggests that although the de velopment of delusions is a basic feature of certain stages of some schizophrenic syndromes, the content of delusions is related to the individual's past experiences, underlying con flicts, developmental impasses, and other idiosyncratic ele ments. 4) The assumption of temporal phases. This report assumes that there are discernible phases or developmental stages in the onset and progression of the schizophrenias. These f phases dif er in the various schizophrenias, but specifying the particular phase of a particular form of schizophrenia is an important consideration in planning research. Although often described in the simple terms, acute or chronic, the as sumptions here are that there are other phases and that each phase may be characterized by a different combination of biologic, psychologic, and social variables. Rheumatic heart disease may serve as an example. The initial stage involves a pharyngitis caused by a virulent strain of group A strep tococci. A small percentage of such patients develop acute rheumatic fever. This phase may be characterized by poly arthritis, carditis, chorea, erythema marginatum, and sub cutaneous nodules. Of those patients who develop a carditis, some also develop endocarditis. During the third phase there is healing of these cardiac lesions and, for some patients, fibrous thickening and adhesion of the valve commissures resulting in the characteristic valvular deformities. The fourth phase involves a variable period (frequently many
Introduction
ll
years) in which the patient may be asymptomatic. The fifth phase involves the development of congestive heart failure secondary to the valvular deformities. This simplified outline is a useful illustration of how the investigator wishing to study rheumatic heart disease must specify which phases of the illness are to be studied. To combine patients from all five phases might well obscure data that could clarify major aspects of the illness. Although the temporal phases of the various schizophre nias are less clearly understood, we wish to emphasize the need to separate and study their phenomenology. To study the schizophrenias by doing research only with chronic pa tients may be similar to trying to understand rheumatic heart disease by studying only those patients experiencing conges tive heart failure secondary to rheumatic valvular disease. 5) The assumption ofadajJtivefailure. Although schizophrenia may develop in the absence of apparent. stress, clinical ob servations suggest that a person is more prone to develop the syndrome during a period in which internal and external events are perceived subjectively as stressful. The assumption that the individual has failed to adapt to stress is difficult to define operationally, although the concept is central to many of the newer and more complex models of disease. Understanding an illness often involves considering how individuals vary in their vulnerabilities to illness in general, their predispositions to specific illnesses, the quality and quantity of life stress, and the role of support groups such as family, friendship networks, and work groups in mitigating the impact of stressful life circumstances. From such an ori entation, the schizophrenias could not be assumed to rise de novo, but rather as attempts to deal with stress, develop mental impasses, or other human predicaments in a manner that is influenced significantly by overall coping capacity, genetic predispositions, developmental deviances, interper sonal support syste�s, and other factors. From this perspec tive, the development of a schizophrenic syndrome can be
12
Complex causalily of the schizophrenias
understood both as an adaptive failure and as a continuing attempt to master both internal and external experiences. In summary, this report emphasizes that in the study of a complex syndrome such as the schizophrenias it is necessary to develop complex models. Models that best approximate a complex, open, interactive system are most likely to yield illuminating results. At the present time multivariate, inter disciplinary approaches appear to be the most productive and powerful means of studying such models. Systems theory holds out a promise, as yet unfulfilled, that may ultimately bring greater coherence to our understanding.
2
THE STATE OF THE FIELD
Although the schizophrenias have been a human concern since the outset of civilization, modem concepts of their na ture arose in the late 19th century at the confluence of psy chiatry's beginnings and medicine's defining the disease process (Klerman, 1978). Since that time, understanding of schizophrenic disor<lers has been influenced by changing medical viewpoints of the nature of the disease process in general. The early success of a circumscribed disease model in the understanding of infectious diseases led to an increas ing emphasis on biologic factors. It was in this scientific at mosphere that Kraepelin ( 1921, 1962, 1968) contributed his categorization of psychiatric disorders. His focus on symptom complexes, etiology, and outcome has sometimes been as sociated with unsuccessful attempts to elucidate a single biol ogic etiology for the schizophrenias, although it is well to emphasize that such an etiology is not a requirement or con straint of Kraepelin's model. Bleuler (1950) provided a descriptive schema for the schizophrenias which differed from Kraepelin's by empha sizing the link between phenomenology and presumed un derlying psychologic processes. Bleuler's efforts suggested the importance of considering factors in at least two do mains-psychologic and biologic-in understanding the etiologies of the schizophrenias. However, the problems of such a complex approach were also reflected in Bleuler's difficulties in developing and supporting a consistent theory of psychologic and biologic contributions to schizophrenia. Another early attempt to integrate psychosocial factors 13
14
Complex causality of the schizophrenias
with biologic variables was the work of Meyer (195 7), whose "psychobiology" had considerable influence on the field, es pecially in American psychiatry. However, the vast detail of assessment required by his approach and the failure to de velop testable etiologic hypotheses may have contributed to the waning influence of Meyer's teachings. Freud (1953, 1954, 1955) and his followers in the psy choanalytic movement developed theories about psycholog ical conflicts and deficits that contributed to an understanding of the etiologies of the schizophrenias. Although they have been useful clinically, these theories have been difficult to test or elaborate from an empirical base. Some psychoanalysts such as Sullivan (1953) were centrally concerned with the schizophrenias, and they inspired a gr�wing emphasis on the role of psychologic factors and their interactions with family relationships in the origins and treatment of the schizophre nias. This approach contrasted strikingly with Kraepelin's and had a powerful effect on etiologic theory. Although not stressing an integrated psychobiologic view of the schizo phrenias, Sullivan's influence provides some paths for sys tematic inclusion of interpersonal and internalized social experience in an integrated model. This historical perspective suggests some of the approaches taken in the past to understanding the etiologies of the schizo phrenias. With the exception of Meyer, there has been no major proponent of an integrated, multiple systems view. Today the majority of research into the causation of the schizophrenias continues to occur in etiologic frameworks that can be seen as derivatives of earlier single-cause forms. Most often such efforts are isolated from each other. This section selectively reviews some of the advances in research about the schizophrenias that are derived from sin gle-domain research and emphasizes how the inclusion of variables from other disciplines _and domains might have in creased the yield. More comprehensive reviews of the evi-
The state of the field
15
dence concerning the etiologies of the schizophrenias exist and are recommended to the reader wishing to pursue them (Arieti, 1974; Bellak & Loeb, 1969; Weiner� 1980). For pur poses of this illustration, theories about the etiologies of the schizophrenias derived from the following disciplines will be examined: genetics, psychophysiology (including perception an � cognition), biochemistry, developmental psychology, and soc10logy.
GENETIC THEORIES The idea that the schizophrenias are genetically caused was in existence long before systematic studies began, as illus trated by the concept of "tainted families." More recently, systematic studies with increased methodological sophistica tion have evolved, resulting in greater understanding (Can cro, 1980). Consanguinity studies, beginning early in the century (Rudin, 1916) and continuing until recently (Bleuler, 1941; Kallman, 1938; Kety, Rosenthal, Wender, Schulsinger, &Jacobson, 1975; Odegaard, 1972; Schultz, 1932; Tsuang, Crowe, Winokur, & Clancy, 1978) have demonstrated that schizophrenia runs in families. However, this fact by no means guarantees that the disorder is genetically caused. Poli�ical or religious beliefs may prevail in families for gen erations, yet few would suggest that such beliefs are geneti cally determined. Perhaps among the most interesting of the consanguinity studies are those of Karlsson ( 1970, 1973). He studied approximately lOO descendants of a woman born in 1735 and found that the family produced, in addition to a large number of psychotic (presumably schizophrenic) per sons, a large number of talented, gifted, and successful in dividuals. Recent studies of children thought to be at risk (because of having one or both parents with schizophrenia) also show that some are unusually creative (Anthony, 1974). Karlsson interpreted this finding to mean that the schizo phrenic syndrome is caused by one or several combinations
Ğ 4 ȓ +ƲǹʽSʽěʽĊóĈpEʽ5 ʽ~ǜ ±ǝ aʽ½ʽôċÿðqʽ ^ɛ ʽ ʽB5D) ¯ ʽʢ ʽ ʽ$% 2 ʽƳǧ ¬ ʽ ʽJŲƌŎ?ɜdʽ8 ʽ ʃ N9M åʽĵ +ň ʽ [ūʽ ğ c ®gǗmʽTʽFzxúpʽ ʎ=. ș° ,0Ǩ"ʽȾOʏ 8 ʽi ʽ 00 ɝ :ʽ^ ʽJȸ1 ʶ Ƚ((ʽȿ%Ƣƴʲ B - )ŏʽ Ƶ ʄ ʽ ƶ ʽ$ʽeɞķ (ʽ MƄʽȜ Z8ɀfƷ Ǻʽ ±Ɂ) ƖʽD6ųʽ Ĕ Ƹ\ʐ ʙəʽ ħK £ȝǯĸ\ŐKʽıKɂʅîʽIJ7Kʩʽ ¤kǻ ʽɟ7<ɠʽƹǼʽ ɡȞƺ +Ƀʽ ȟ ʷ Ț³ƻC9 Ɨʽ Q?Ƙ Ǟ Oʽ Pʆ( ʍ9 ʽ ʽ Ŭ ʧʽ ʑʼnǖ I ʽ Z ' ʽ ! Ƽƍ¶ & ǽ ǩ"ʽǰ Ƞ ʽŴȹȺ ȡ©ʽ ɢƣ ʽ ƽ ʽDZ ɣőƤ ʽŒA@ b^ǟ!æʽij 8 ʽ ʒƙƚ Ʉɤhʽ ɥ Ĺ/ʽɦ (ʽĺʇʈŵ ɧƾȈǾʽŭŶƎœƿɨʽǀɅʽǿ ɩʽɆŷŔȉ ĻȢʪʽɪȊʽɫƥŸʽDzȋȣŹʽƑ ƛȤļȀɬʽ ʫ dz ʽ ʽɭƦ ʽ dʬŕƧ ɮǁŖʽ ǂɇ¡; ;çʽ ĥ 7 ȥʽ Qź Ľ § Êʽ ƨ ´ ʚ Ëʽ ʓƜƝ Ɉɯʽ ® ʽ dŗƩ n¤ Ȧ *Řʽ ` ɰ , ɉʽ řʽ ľ ȁɱ 2 ʽ Ŀ:'ʽ ŀȧŻʽ ʔ =+ ʽ ʽ Ə O ʽ ;P< ɲʽ ǃ ʽ Ƈc ʽ 2 -Ȍ: ,P Ǡʽ · e »¼ʽ H ʽ ŁȨ Eʽ ɳ ȩ - Ìʽ ƒ '(Ůʽ Ŋʭʽ ¸ Ȃ Ɋ«L 8 Gŋǡ ʽ % Ȕɴe¹ʽ S &Ī ʮ _ JfÍʽ U#āñÃèʽ ĜPʽ Lɋʽ N1 ż'ʽ ƪ ʽ ʕŚ ʽ DŽ ʽ 1% .ʽ ʨ ʯʽ ʽ ɵ Nʽ ƫ ʽ +"ʽ fśł ʽ ʽB."ŜƬ Dž%ʽ l D Ȫ ʣ ïʽ ǘ_Rʽ TʽU#vûqʽ ©ȍʽ Ɍ² ƞ . ʽ 06Ń/ʽ !ŝ džʴ B a )Ş.ʽ ȫ ʽ $ țʖ / "ʽ ʉʊ @i 2 ʽ Ō ʽ %4 @Mjʽ ! &ɶʽ / ʽ Ȭ Q ɷʽ 5ªȕ şO!ʽ ʽ hi éʽ ĝ:ʽ ʽ -LJ ʽ ¢ƅʽ ° Lj 3ʽ Đg lʽ ʽ lj!ʽ I Ǫ Žɍʽ TđɎ - lʽ ʽ ġ ĕCNJ ʸ Îʽ õ#wĉrʽ ö#yUČʽ Ē« - ȎREʽ Ƌ"Ïʽ &Ė L Ǵ ȃÐʽ ʽ ėǢ ʹ Ñʽ ǣ Òʽ } < : ʤÓʽ ʽ Ĭ ƈƉʰrʽ 7 § Eʽ FzćǕčʽ Ģ > C? F{yòÄʽ ʛ ʽ , ȭ ɸ ůʽ 0ƭ4 ʽ ʽ ɏŠ n ` ; &ʽ j gʽ 4 ʽ Nj t Yʽš )Ǥ'Ȯ ʽ * ɹʽ ʽ Ɛ%*ž Xʱʽ ʽ ʜ8 H ʽ * Ɠȯ¶ nj ʼʽ ¨ȑŢ ? ʽ NƮ ʽ ńmʽ W ʽ ʽ W +ȏ Ǎţʽ $;Ǚ ;ʽ ƊȒ¥ʽ ʽ ƔȰ ʽ ¡Ɔʽ ɐŤƯ9ʵ Ȅ <êʽ 1ʽ <, ʽ I ãR ȱǚ Ȳ ʽ ¾Ġ ] ʗÔʽ ~ʘť ɑ= ǵÕʽ Ę$ C3ʽ ĭ C51ɚɒ3ʽ ʽ Į >Ǜ.Öʽ F#ĂĀÅʽ ' ʺ ɺ ʽ/ Dʽ 5/ @/¬ʽʥǎD7ʽ Ŧ6)µ_B ȳ ]*Ņʽ ʝ ʽ ʞ 4 ʽ 2 Y Űʽ ` 9 ʽ h ʽɻ ʽ $9[ʽ ʽ H ʽ ¿ ȴʽ' ¦ ɓ Æʽ ´ ʽ ?ȅ&ȵ ʽ ǏǶ1 ǐ Ȇëʽ I ʽ b 1 ʽ ʟ ʽ+ ʽ ¢ʽŪ :.L b = ʽ 5 ȇɼʽ ō k¯ʽ ʽHʋ \ Ǒ£,4ǥʽȖȻ =Ǧ 3ʽWk ʽ* ɽ ¦ ɔʽ A ʽ* ªʽ ņ ¨ ʽQ -mʽÀĤʽ ³X ɾ ſ) ×ʽ u#ăĄÇìʽ V n Ň ʽ G Jʽ X äʦ Y ȶɕʽ ÁęA µZ ]Øʽ Ĩ ŧʌ Ùʽ ʽ V Ɵưƀɖ3ʽ ÷#wüĎʽ V o ,Úʽ ĩȼ Ũɿ ¥3ʽ 2"Ûʽ Ķ ǫ Üʽ ģ Ǭ o Ýʽ ʽ Ě cʀÞʽ u|ąýÈʽ $ ʽ 6 ʽ űʽ & ǭǮƁ Ơ² ʽ Sį6 ßʽ } àʽ ʽ Ħʠ( ʁ sʽ ø|Ćþďʽ İ ơGɗ sʽ īA áʽ ʽ ēǷ âʽ ù{xvÉʽ Ʊ 2 ʽ Ǹ @ 0ȷ 0 ʽGʽ ǒ!A ʽȐ ʽƂ" ʽ Mʡ !ʽ Ǔ[ʽ ʽ>7 ʳ ʻ 6 ƃ ũʽ ʂ jíʽ Ĵ ʽ > ǔo ȗ a >ʽ ʽ ƕ Rɘʽ ºȘ t
30
Complex causality of the schizophrenias
drugs can decrease relapse rates when administered to schizo phrenic patients returning to high EE families. In contrast, the drugs appear to have no effect on relapse (at nine months following hospital discharge) for those patients who return to families rated low on E.E. More recentlv, both Falloon (Falloon & Lieberman, 1983) and Leff (Leff, Berkowitz, & Kuipers, 1983) have shown that family interventions directed at reducing the high EE can decrease relapse rates dramat ically. As another example of cross-domain research, Leff ( 1976) has shown that schizophrenic persons in high EE families have a heightened autonomic responsivity compared to those in low EE families. These studies are outstanding in illus trating the complex interactions between social context, treat ment effect, and psychophysiologic variables.
SOCIOCULTURAL THEORIES The impact of cultural and broad environmental variables has been particularly difficult to explore rigorously. How ever, a biopsychosocial model of disease necessitates consid eration of sociocultural variables. These broad areas may be the richest veins yet to be mined, particularly as sociologic and epidemiologic methods become more sophisticated. A central question concerns whether the prevalence of the schizophrenias changes across national boundaries, among races, and over long periods of time. The available evidence indicates that the schizophrenias are ubiquitous and do not appear to occur with significantly different prevalences in different cultures, nations, or races (Goldhamer & Marshall, 1953). Some studies have suggested that national origin may influence the type of symptoms in affected individuals, but prevalences remain remarkably similar (Opler & Singer, 1956). There is, however, growing evidence that the course of schizophrenic illnesses is more benign in nonindustrial
The state of the field
31
societies (Satorious, Jablensky, & Shapiro, 1977) and in re porting a study in Sri Lanka, Waxler (1979) has discussed the ways in which family structure, multiple treatment sys tems, and systems of belief may account for the lessened prevalence of chronicity. A related question, also dealing with various social envi ron?1ents, is whether prevalences change over long periods of t111;1e. The answer is uncertain because of reporting dif _ fic �lues �nd �he cha�ging diagnostic systems used during vanous h1stoncal periods. However, references to psychotic, presun:iably schizophrenic, individuals such as the man pos sessed m the Apostle Mark's tale of the Gadarene swine (Mark 5:9) have been common since human existence has been re corded. C learly_, stress can arise from mai:iy sources within a per , son s environment, and such stress mcreases individual vul nerability to illness (Brown & Birley, 1968; Holmes & Rahe, 1967; Paykel, Prusoff, & Myers, 1975; Rahe, Mahan, Arthur, & Gunderson, l 970; Selye, 1956). A number of investigators (Bro:wn & Birley, 1968; Jacobs & Myers, 1976; Rogler & Ho)lmgshead, _1965) have demonstrated that schizophrenic pat�er �ts expenenced more stressful life events preceding their illnesses than socioeconomicallv matched normal con trols. Also focusing on environmental variables, several stud ies (Malzberg & Less, 1956; Odegaard, 1932) have implicated crosscu �tural migration as a stress that increases the preva le�ce of t?e sc�izophrenias. These studies show a higher rate of illness m emigrants than in those who remain in their place of birth. Res earch on socio�conoi:nic variables has shown that being _ poor 1s correlated with a higher prevalence of schizophrenia (Clark, 1948; Faris & Dunham, 1939; Hollingshead & Red lich, 1958). Some authors suggest that poor persons' abilities to cope with stress are diminished (Langer & Michael, 1963). A higher prevalance of schizophrenia in the lowest social class
32
Complex causality of the schizophrenias
in large cities has been demonstrated, although this finding diminishes when studying cities of less than 500,000 popu lation (Clausen & Kohn, l 959). Such findings about social class raise perplexing questions. Do people with schizophrenia drop into lower social classes because of their various disabilities? Or do poor and disor ganized neighborhoods increase the chance of a person's becoming schizophrenic because of higher rates of repro ductive casualties, the lack of availability of good general health care and nutrition, the lack of social supports, or other characteristics of such neighborhoods? These questions can not be answered at present, but even a brief review suggests that both socioeconomic and urban geographic variables have impact on the. pathogenesis of the schizophrenias. Such re ports, by themselves, however, are limited. The studies of socioeconomic variables, for example, have not involved fam ily characteristics in order to understand whether being poor remains a risk factor when controlled for family competence. Many treatment studies examine socioeconomic status only as a variable to be controlled, rather than examining its re lationship to treatment, course, and outcome. Cross-domain research involving sociocultural variables might be very fruitful, but it has been rare. One example in the realm of theoretical linkage is Murphy's catalog of studies in which changes in the incidence of schizophrenia over time correlate with stressful changes in social conditions such as war, geographic displacement, or role definitions (Murphy, 1967). He develops a theory of the nature of stresses that are evocative of schizophrenia and cites four qualities of such stresses: I) the stress demands an unlearned response, 2) the stress is perceived as important, 3) there is no simple solution, and 4) it is chronic. He elaborates on these criteria by noting that the stress demands action or at least decisions by the individual and that the correct (i.e., satisfying) action is dif ficult to recognize because of the complexity or ambiguity of the information available. Under these circumstances, Mur-
The swre or the field
33
phy feels that the incidence of schizophrenia can increase two- or threefold, but rarely more. There is an obvious par allel between these defining charaCLeristics of the cultural stressors evocative of schizophrenia and the double-bind the ory of families of schizophrenic individuals.
!$ "$ $ $ # $
BĦŒ ȗȧ 1Ƅȧ ȃ ȧ $91kȧ r`ƅ ȧ ! ȧ Ŭ &ƿȧ Zȧ S ǀȧ Ĝ ȧ ':^ ǁ ȧ ! ȧȘħ B$£ȧ gȧ( : ìȧ ȧƠ Ŕ ȧ» Qŭ EĨ }ȧ ~ȍ ȧE óȧhŮ 'ǜȧ &3ȧ ŕ ŵ FĝȧKćȧǝ % ȧơ # ȧǞ ȧ ÐæKů Ţō ȧĩ} ô_ ǂÑ BĪ ¼#TȧH Ɔ ȣ Ƈ% ȧ ǟ íī fȧ ·qE 'ȧP5 ȧ mõ ǃ½. ȧN ȧĬ0ȧ ` 0OĭŰ î ȧ +Ȗ NA,ęȧ=R, ȧ Ŷ3ȧ ¾dA,>ȧ 9ȧ ș0" ȧ &çC Ŗö ¤ȧ º Ȥ 08ȧ &ȧ , ÷Ƣ Į8*A į ƣȚȧ!+¿ ȧ DŽȧÀ $ ȧ ,ȧƚ Á;øeȧèƓ İ < 9É <ȧ Ǡı% ȧ IJDžȧ Ƥùƞ ija ïȧ ǡ ȧnƥú P ȧ ǢĞ ȧ űûn JĴ džȧ m 8LJiƦ ȧ ĕ.ȧ ȧ 1 ȧC4ȧ ȧLj1 ȧ ȧé ţ iÊƈ. !ĵ ȧ > Ȟ ǣ Ɖ'¥ȧ´ ȧ , ȧ ȧ-ü Ķ $"Iȧ Ȏ ȧ Ƨ ȧ/ ] Yƨ ȧ Ǥ5ȧN ȧ ŷU` ȧ ğ ȧ œ " ȧ =ȧ* Ť ^ ķD ȧ J ȧ )Cȧ ǥ Zȧ !? ȧ Ò Ʃ ȧ Ė:c ȧ WȧǦ6 ȧĸ ǧ ƪ$ (ÓĹƛŗ MTȧ qđƊ#Ǩ¦ȧ °ȧ M3ȧ Ȅ%-Oĺ7 ȧ Yljȧ F ȧ >5Ř ȧ 6 ȧ NJȅ , ȧ ǩ Ô5Ÿ ]R ȧ '3ȧ Õ ȧ ǪĻȏ9_ 1 ȧ ǫ 8! Ö ȧ \ ƻ * Njȧ * ȧƫ × ȧ ȧ& 3ȧė^ȧ: Ø TȧƬ Ǭȧ ðȧ : ƭýtȌť țȧê ~ vñ ȧ 6T Dǭ ( §ȧ ¸ Ù6ȧ njȆl ǮȇOļDŹȧ 7sȧ ) Ú@JƋř[ ȧ 4 ȧ ǯX > ȧ Ǎȧ + ȧCr Zȧ wźȧ SX !ȧ ȧË &ȧU Ŧ ȧ! ȧ Ġ Q' ȧ \_ V ®ȧ ±ȧ Ě ȧ Ż ÌþƮȧ 4ȧ Ľ Í ȧ  +ȧ RƯ òȧ ȧ Ĕ;1 /ȧ Ś ľ2ȧ +Û Ɵ < ȧ ȧȈ ȧ ȧ ǎ ư;?ȧ Ę ȧ ǰ Ŀ !xIjŧ ȧ W|2 &)ȧƱ y ż ġwLǏ¨ȧ¹ "bȧ - Ƽ V ȧ6 ȧ ȧ Q DZ ŀk Ũ ȧ ŽĢ Ü ȧ #ȧ () ' ž ȧ ĈȧP ȧ H? ȡC- fȧ gȧ =ƖR/ ?ȧ c ŁD ȧ ł0ȧ 5 ȧ X ȧ ;Ɣ o à ȧ ȧ b) 2ȧ Lƽ Î ǐȧ 7=ȧ Ȃ ŃǑÝ Ŏ ȧ U. 8¡ Ų ń ȧ Ʋ b .; ȧ d Gȧ WƗMȧDz ȧųƌ dzȧ aȁGȧ &ȧ( ś ÿ$ȧÄJ ȧȓŏũ ȧ Ǵ ȧF Ā# ēƘƳ Gȧ % ȧ )@ ȧ aƍu āǒǓȧƎsȧEģ ȧz Ȑ ǔEŅu ǵzƏſ©ȧ ² ǕĆŪȜ ȧǶ@ ƴ ȧÅƵ ȧǷĤƐ +ȧ
! " " " " " " " " " " " ǖ Bȑp ªȧ ¶ A1 ȧ ĉȧ ȧ ȉ -ǸYƑ Ǘȧ ȧ Ȕ / «ȧ ³ Ɯ ȧ ƒȊ.ȧ Ï ū" Ċȧǹ jǺȧ I - eȧÞƾƕǘǙ¢3 ȧ. Ă 2 ȧ ȕ Bȧ $Ȓ *<ȧ ƀ </ ǻÆ ȧ =ȧ Ǽ ȧ I Ȣ L / Ɓ ȧ ȧ SA ȧ ȧ \ ȟ ȧ 9!ȧ N ȧ2 H -ǽ ÇŜȧ ȧŝ ě ) Hȧ D ȧS ȧ pȧ 2 Ƃ ƶ ¯ȧ % ȧ7ċȧ 5 ȧ #ȧ È ȧ 4ȧ $ ] ȧ Čȥ 4ƙ ȧ # ȧ % ¬ȧ µh ȝȧ 7čȧF@ ȧ( %ăȧ ņĎĒŐßȋ { ǚȧ ƷŇ Ąȧ ȧ à6ȧ 0cá ȧ L/ ő * ȧ Ǿȧ ǿ " ȧ Ɲ Ş+ ȧ * ȧ ȧ | y "Ƞ ȧ ȧ ş v' ȧ ȧ8 ȧ Q ȧ ďȧ" d x> Ȁ ȧt ȧ o ȧ 4ȧ ? ȧF@Ƹ ȧ Ŵ ňƃ ȧ lʼnK 7 ŊâGȧ 0 ãĥ Š[ "V ȧǛKäŋ š ȧO ȧ # ((ȧ ȧ)[ȧë ƹȦ Đ ȧP ąȧƺ å M#{ ȧŌ ȧ
3 3 3 3
} S ƿ ĵ Řį ƿ ƿ (V q³ .ęƿŁ š ł ƿ ƿÿ d" = ƿ ưƿ Ð!ƿ Ê čĤƫ Kƿ Ń Âƿ ń ŢC ( ƿ 4$Í aƑ ţtƿ ~ ƿ É Ť ƿ ŵÑ( ƿ Ʈ5 ƿ ƿ ť>Y$ ƿ Jş ƿ Ŷ ƿ B ) g ƿ Dƿ ƿ ă ¡ƿ Ü k h " $K ĥŅmƿ ƿ D Ąjƿ %Th Ŧ Î8 Ħ nƿ ƿ ƿ Ķ j¢ Ʊ 9 £ƿ ƽ Ƣ ŷÝÏ Zuƿ Bƿ Ë+řƒÒƿ Ư ķ ƿ%ĎďƖ` ņ ¹ŧƿ ƿ ` - Đ Ʋƿ Eƿ Ň )r #PĚƿ) + ŨƿƬÞ ÓßUƿ ƿRħě / e à ąƿW[ƿ ƣ đ ƿ È\ S i'_Ăvƿ6ƿ ňºĿƗ ƿGij\ƿ¤_ s ' áĜƿ Ƙ â ƿ ƿ ƿFāT l ã ƿiäŸÔå ƿ »ƿ V M ƿŹÕ ƿæũƿʼn ĸŚ ƙA. ƿ & ƿ? ( ¥1 Q ¦ƿ Fƿ 2ƿ 0! ƿ !ƿ ƚ- ś'+ ƿ ĨÃƿŪ§Öçƹ Ŋ O>ƿ Ĺ 2è! Ɠ wƿ 6 Ę ƿ ƭéź ƿŻ ūƿH%ĝ M oƿ ×¼ƿ ĞƤ N : İŋƿ ! ƿêU±R+ ƿ) Ć ż ´ƿƥ 5 $ ƿJŠ ƿ ŽØ Yƿ )¨$ĺć ğ ƿ µƿ ĩ Ŭƿ ƿıŜ ƿžXƿ% ©Z " ƿ ſ ƿ ŝ -: /Ē Ƴƿ EƿO¶ PGƴë ƿ ìƦ ] ƿƧ ] ƿ# ƿ 1Ù ƿ í 5 ; aî ƿ [ ƀ%ƨ ƿ Ġƿ ƿ ½ .ĪĈī Ƶƿ XHƿ<ƿ Ļ* Qªƛĉ Ōƿ Ìō ƿ 'Äƿ ? ƺ Ú ! ï xƿ
/ '$ 3 &(+% $ 0! -3 & 31 3- "2)* , &# .3 7 Cƿ 9Ŏ <ƿ ĬÅƿŏ " *(« ƿ Ɓ *Ƃƿ ="ƿ Ɣ @ ƿ ļ ŭðŮƃ Ƅƿ *ƅ ñĭ&ƿ ò ƿƆÛ ƿ ¾, ƿIIJ ƿ Ƈ Ā¬ƿ Į ē ó ůƿôġƿ ƿ õƻ ^ k yƿ ƿ Æƿ Ɯ ƿŐ 8 ƿ #Ʃ ƿ Ĕe· ƿ ö ƿ ő , ƿ f bŒ, Ű ƕ ƿ ƈ# ÷Ɖ űpƿ ^ ø®f ƶƿ ¸ & 3 ƿ ƾ Ɲ¯ Ųzƿ |d; c 4 ƿW ƿ ŀƞ ĕ 1 g ƿ Ċc œ# ù & ƿ ƿ ¿ ƊNl ° 0ĖƷƿ² ƋŔ ė0 ƿ ƼƸ ųƿ ƌƿ Ɵ ƍƿ IĴŕƿbL ƿ/ĢƎ Ŗ úƏ2 ƿ Ľŗ 3 ģƿ Çƿ"Ơ ƿ ơ@û& À Ŵ{ƿ 7 Áƿ Ş ċ ƿ ƪ 4 ƿü ƿ 3Aý ƿƐL ƿľ' Č ƿ þ ƿ
46
Complex causality of the schizophrenias
role of such metabolites is that various studies have conflict ing findings. As one example, several researchers (Murray, Oon, Rodnight, Birley, & Smith, 1979; Rodnight, Murray, Oon, Brockington, Nicholls, & Birley, 1976) report increased excretion of the hallucinogen dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in psychosis, while others (Carpenter, Fink, Narasimhachari, & Himwich, 1975) find no difference between schizophrenic patients and normal subjects. Although differences in bio chemical techniques may explain these conflicting reports, much of the variance may be accounted for by the interaction of psychological or social variables with the abnormal met abolic process. The studies have grouped patients solely on the basis of diagnosis or current symptoms which alone pro vides insufficient differentiation among potential subgroups of schizophrenic patients. The importance of endogenous hallucinogens or other metabolic variables in some forms of schizophrenia may thus be lost. In a cross-domain approach the biologic investigator who has identified a group of schizophrenic subjects with an ab normal metabolite might next consider other biologic factors, such as genetic loading or diet, then select specific psycho social variables from other domains. In this example, we sug gest that variables such as genetic loading, family competence, life stress, and treatment response might be productive fac tors to include. A series of preliminary questions could be asked. Examples are: Do schizophrenic subjects with an ab normal metabolite demonstrate genetic loading for schizo phrenia? Are they members of families that share particular interactional characteristics? Are their psychotic episodes as sociated with high levels of life stress? Do they respond to certain psychotropic agents? Are they accessible to particular psychotherapeutic modalities? More specific hypotheses could be tested, for example, that schizophrenic subjects with high genetic loading for schizo phrenia, from families with relatively high levels of family competence, who experience high levels of life stress prior
Approaches to cross-domain research
47
to the onset of psychotic symptomatology will demonstrate the highest levels of the abnormal metabolite. Further, one could hypothesize that such subjects will respond to pheno thiazines, but will be difficult lO engage in traditional forms of individual psychotherapy. In testing the hypotheses, the criteria for inclusion must be considered carefully. In this example subjects should be included only if they have a DSM-III diagnosis of Schizo phrenic Disorder for two years or more, have been free of neuroleptic drugs for at least two weeks, have a normal CAT scan, and demonstrate the absence of exogenous hallucino genic drugs in the urine and the absence (by history) of the use of such drugs during the preceding month. Each independent variable could be arranged in scalar form. Genetic variables can be rated by assessing the degree of genetic loading for schizophrenia. Approaches Lo obtain ing reliable genetic data and defining genetic loading are far from settled issues. At the minimum, specific questions must be addressed as, for example, how is schizophrenia in rela tives to be determined? Should both first- and second-degree relatives be included? What other diagnoses in relatives should be counted as part of the index of genetic loading? Even within an otherwise homogeneous sample of schizo phrenic patients, considerable variation in the duration and severity of the schizophrenic syndrome can be expected.
Scales to measure duration and severity can be used to assess
their relationship to other independent variables as well as to the dependent variables. Family system variables can be assessed in a similar manner. One possibility would be measuring the level of family com petence (Lewis et al., 1976) with a global rating of the family's level of psychological functioning. Measures of life stress can be quantified using available scales (Holmes & Rahe, 1967) for stressors operating during a fixed period prior to either illness onset or hospitalization. Treatment-response variables also may be important as
48
Com plex causalit)' of lhe schizo phrenias
they relate to the biologic dependent variable. Whether or not the subject has improved promptly with neuroleptics during prior psychotic periods and whether relapses occur if neuroleptic treatment is stopped can both be rated in scalar form. Participation in psychotherapy can be rated along a number of dimensions as, for example, attendance, accessi bility for a working alliance, and therapist's status reports. The dependent variable chosen for this brief example is the urinary excretion of an abnormal metabolite, an endog enous hallucinogen. The major difference between this ex ample and earlier published studies is the use of a small number of specific variables from biologic, psychologic, and social domains as independent variables. Multivariate regres sion analyses permit a determination of the contribution of each independent variable to the measure of the dependent variable. Such analyses could both clarify the nature of spe cific subgroups of schizophrenic patients and lead to more focused and specific hypotheses to be tested in subsequent investigations.
A FAMILY SYSTEMS RESEARCH STUDY Family systems and the schizophrenias
The investigator in the area of family systems also needs to consider ways in which nonfamily variables may increase un derstanding of the role of family factors in the etiologies of the schizophrenias. Reiss (1975), for example, reported that there had been no investigations into the etiologies of the schizophrenias published by a family researcher that focused on the interaction of family and nonfamily variables. Several conceptual issues may have impeded progress in understanding the etiologic role of family variables. One issue is the need for clarification regarding the role of family var iables specific to the development of the schizophrenias as opposed to the development of psychopathology in general.
Approaches to cross-donrnin research
51
a specific factor predisposing to a type of schizophrenic dis order. A final dependent variable will be a measure of family expressed emotion (EE) that has been demonstrated to have predictive power regarding relapse in schizophrenic patients (Leff, l 976; Leff & Vaughn, 1980; Vaughn & Leff, 1976). High levels of family EE will be considered a variable that sustains a family member's schizophrenic disorder. In this type of family research, the inclusion of nonfamily variables can lead to a better understanding of the ways in which family variables may play a variety of roles in predis posing, precipitating, or sustaining certain types of schizo phrenic disorders in family members. In particular, the patterns of interaction of family and nonfamily variables could illuminate additional, more specific hypotheses to be tested in subsequent investigations.
A PSYCHODYNAMIC RESEARCH STUDY Symbiosis and the schizophrenias
The investigator whose primary interest is psychodynamics can further understanding of the role of such factors in the etiologies of the schizophrenias by designing investigations that include variables from other disciplines and domains. In the following example, the role of symbiosis in the etiol ogies of the schizophrenias is explored. The concept of symbiosis, developed in studies of early child development, describes that period in which the child is intensely and dependently attached to its object world while still unable to discriminate the boundary of self from that of the object. This concept has been applied to adult schizo phrenia, most notably by Searles ( 1965) who posited that a developmental impasse in the symbiotic phase was pivotal in the development of adult schizophrenia and was essential in understanding the transference relationship that develops
54
Complex causality of the schizophrenias
between more frequent and traumatic early separation from mothers and other caregivers and disturbed autonomic pat terns (Mednick & Schulsinger, 1970). The hypothesis pre dicts that a history of such events will predict symbiotic schizophrenia. The second group of hypOLheses involves the subjects' re sponses to hospitalization and the subliminal stimulation of "Mommy and I are one." The subliminal stimulation is based on the work of Silverman and co-workers (Silverman, Lach mann, & Milich, 1982) which suggests that "better differ entiated" schizophrenic patients respond to repetitive exposure to the subliminal stimulus, "Mommy and I are one," by re duction in their thought disorders. The first hypothesis reflects the belief that separation from the symbiotic object, as occurs at the time of hospitalization, increases thought disorder; it predicts that a greater baseline thought disorder f ollowing admission to the hospital will pre dict symbiotic schizophrenia. A second hypothesis, based on the report that the sublim inal stimulus provides only better differentiated schizo phrenic subjects with a form of symbiotic gratification (Silverman et al., 1982) is that failure in reduction of thought disorder in response to the subliminal stimulation, "Mommy and I are one," will predict symbiotic schizophrenia. The third group of hypotheses involves the relationship between intervention efforts and the dependent variables and are based on the belief that patients with symbiotic schizo phrenia are particularly vulnerable to issues of separation. One hypothesis predicts that separation from the symbiotic parent will extend the period of initial cognitive disruption which wilf be less responsive to neuroleptic treatment. Im provement in the thought disorder will occur only insofar as the institution or therapist substitutes as a symbiotic object f or the patient. The hypothesis is that slower resolution of psychotic symptomatology will predict symbiotic schizophre nia. Other hypotheses are: A recurrence of psychotic symp-
Approaches to cross-domain research
57
There is an open-ended exploratory component to devel opmental studies that extend over long periods of time even though they require a mo<lel of human development and, in this instance, a model of the development of schizophrenia, as well as focused hypotheses. That is, data indicating the interaction of variables at either one or several points in the time can be useful in establishing more restricted hypotheses to be tested in smaller, cross-sectional studies. The most general statement of the model of human de velopment involves the interplay of biologic, psychologic, and social variables in this progressive unfolding of the child's ego integrity and sense of self. Deviation in one variable (or system of variables) influences all other variables and, in turn, is influenced by the response of those variables to the initial change. Developmental models focus particularly on the se quence of events and processes and rely often on the concept of critical periods. A large number of developmental varia bles have ample theoretical or empirical data to warrant their inclusion in designs investigating the etiologies of the schizo phrenias. Selection of variables is complex and, in this ex ample, we wish merely to illustrate the range of variables rather than to suggest a complete list. In keeping with the assumptions about the schizophrenias noted earlier, we expect to find that there are multiple de velopmental pathways to the schizophrenias and that differ ent domains of variables play critical roles in the different developmental pathways. Although such research empha sizes the complex interaction of etiologic variables, the de velopment of some patients' schizophrenic syndromes may be more heavily influenced by biologic deviations, and other patients' syndromes more by psychologic or social variables. In this example, the independent variables will be certain genetic, constitutional, family system, and phase-specific in fant and childhood interactional processes within their social context (such as attacRment behavior, separation-individua tion, initial school experiences, pubertal experiences, and
¢ ɠ %Ł ˆ ɡ )2ˆ Rnmǻɢˆ wˆ Ć +á(ȦǓ Ċˆ Dť &Ǽ<Ƣ6ˆ ˆ ɣ ˆ ˆ ļǽˆ âȧ Ȯw P !'Ŧƶˆ ǾRȯ ´ǿã ˆ Ʒˆ iȀP ȁˆ ɤ ˆ ĩʎȭʍŊĕȂˆ ǔ5 ˆ 5ƸQ ˃ Ȱ " ŧ,:ˆ ǕĪˆ ɥŋ ˆ ä ʾ ǰŌp "> ȱ ˆ ʦ ˆ ŨȲXˆ ɦ.ˆ ,ǖ ˆ Nȃ T_ʱˆɧ ˆ ũƯ ƣ åH Ūgƹȳˆ ǗUˆ ɨ ū$ˆ ĖưDZōµȴ ȵˆ ĽȄˆ ÙǘɩŎˆ ć`Ŭ ŭæ=Iƺ$ˆ H#ċˆ Ǚȶėˆ q $oAƻȷŮMƤ ˆľrˆ3DØůƼŰ łˆ ȸʲç;űIɪtŲȹFȺˆ¶ƽ ˆǚɫ; ȅˆ 3·ƥˆ ¸ 4ŏˆ DzD 9 ȻųǛƾ& ȼ ˆ £* ƿ èŴ¹ ȽˆȆ x ǀȾ ÚƦ ˆijǬ ˆ Ő ˆɬB #|ˆǜīˆ º˄ ɭ> $ˆ ʧŵ ;ˆéXŶʿ dz ȇ cŷ7ˆGŸȿ.Ȉ ȉ0ˆ # ˆ ǝˆ5-Q Ȋɀ » ˆ ˆ êǞ!Ǵ ʯ\ ʳˆ ȋ ǁ ˆ Ź ˆ ɮ ˆ ǵ_^ë ɯ ǟǂˆ ĬˆɰőźɁˆ :ǃhɂŻɃ ˆ ż+ˆ ȌɱŽì Jȍ ˆ Œ ˆ ʜ Ȏž¼N=Ƨſ 6ˆ iSˆ í½5Ʉ ˆ Ļî4 ȏɅ ˆ ĭʏɲʐȐ ˆ O ȑ1Ęy ˆ ˆA ɳïǠ@ Ɇ ˆ ¨Ĵˆɴœ]Eˆð Ʊ ƭħʰ ʴˆ<ɇˆȒęñjŃe Č ˆƀ ˆ Ɉˆ Öơ ȓˆ <bn* ò +ɉˆ ĮǡȔˆ ʨˆ /+ ˆ ǶǷs &óY zˆ 7 dƁô ?ˆ ɊƂ ʑ¾ >kDŽ{ˆ ˅ ʝ ƨʞƃDžńˆ ¿ɵƄĚdž}ɋˆʩƅ ˆ®õ )ˀ ȕ(LJƆöˆ¤ Ɍ Bč s1 ˆ±Ŕ ˆĿ Ƈ Vˆ ǢÛɍ8Bʟ&ɶ Lj ˆ Ɏ÷ȖƈM ˆŀʒȗˆɏ%ø[ˆ a * ùÀ Ɖ "2¡ˆ &+eE$ 'I =, gG U- <VNg = g cW =O/b g ` 8] W.A>P g ³Z ljˆ J ěʠÁ?ʓÂɷƊ.NJˆ ˆ?Ɵ@Ƌɸ ˆ ˆ~ŕĜˆ 1ɐʔ8ˆh9ˆʪŖ Fŗ Cˆ È Äɹ Nj|ˆĵʚ 9 Ʈ ɑˆ úȘ)ɺĝș ňS.Țˆ¥¯« ©ª¦ˆ ^ÆWnjǣ0]$ˆ Ǥįˆ°ûŘ=ˁ řq Ǎƌüˆ Gƍ0 t Ğț ˆ Ǝɻˆ Əɒˆ -ǥ ˆ zɓƐÜƩ ˆ ˆɔ'ʵˆ ʡ Ȝʶˆ ʕý ˆ'Ý ɼˆ ɽŚğˆþÇʖɕ( ˆ ɾȝ Èɿb ǎ4 ˆ É,Ďˆĺʛ ʗȞ ˆÿ %C{ ˆ ݈ ˆ0Ǹ ĀƑĸƠ7ˆoÊʀ ˆ§eˆFśƒɖˆ Ȩ ˆʫ ˆ ŜËʢ ˆ ʁȟƓĠ ˆʂ ˆā #ʣ ʷˆ3ŝÌʃˆ Ş ˆĈ`Ɣ# Ă ÍǏˆ Ʋ%ɗʄˆO/" ƕď CˆLˆʬƖĐ ˆȩLfW ˆ Ǧıˆ ʤÎȠƗÏÞ*Ĩ2ˆ ) ĉ % ǐVˆ ʅ ǧɘ ˆ ĶȪǨƳˆ ʆş ˆ !' dxˆ Tˆ ßƘ :6 ˆ ǹ1ʸăYǩƪkŅʹ ˆÐcđˆ2/Ą jƫ ņʺ ˆ * gXJ \; ?YgB%gH Z/#=[QgʭƙʇŠˆ )0fF7 (K =1 g 2RCL !MTgS)D^9 àġˆ3@ 4a5 _ :6d" g ² ȫAʘŇšlʙʈˆʉ ƚəˆȡ /u3ˆ ʮ ˆ Ñʥ ˆȢ U pr Ēˆ gˆ ˆɚą \˂ǯ ȣ K ˆƛ ˆǭ ˆʊǪˆ ƴǺŢ ɛ ˆ4[ ˆţĢ~ vǮň - ʋ6ˆ ǫIJˆ 8ɜ ˆ Ɯɝlu Ȥɞ ˆ ¬f ˆ }ˆ ƵÒʻˆ , ēˆ Z Ƭ ˆ Eģ vÓ Ɲ ʼnˆ ĹȬ @ˆ Ô"ˆ ĤǑ! ɟ ˆ ķ×aƞ ʼ ˆ ȥĥKEˆ -mʌŤ ˆ !Õʽˆ ǒĦ(Ĕˆ y
Implications for treatment and training
65
most profitable base for developing better models about the nature of the schizophrenias. The central thesis of this report has implications also for those whose primary involvement is training psychiatrists and other professionals. What has been said about the complexity of the schizophrenias underscores the importance of teaching a way of thinking about the etiologies of these disorders that reflects the role of multiple domains and many variables. Therefore, students need to be introduced to the complexity of these syndromes without either oversimplification or focus on a single domain. Present gaps in our knowledge need to be presented with equal clarity. Competing theoretical models of the schizophrenias should be presented; they stimulate thought and study. The schizophrenias often have an unclear onset and a long course, which makes it helpful to the trainee to have a clear understanding of the basic concepts of child and adolescent development as well as clinical experience with intensive, long-term treatment modalities of individuals with these syn dromes by which to observe the interactions between life events, relationships, and fluctuations in symptoms. Many training programs are located in institutions or de partments in which there is a major emphasis upon biology, psychology, or sociology. Trainees in such institutions or de partments, in particular, need to be introduced to a broadly based understanding of the biopsychosocial factors involved in the etiologies of the schizophrenias. In a parallel manner, trainees need to become comfortable with using a wide va riety of treatment modalities. Biologic, psychologic, and social treatments are each useful and necessary in the treatment of many patients with Schizophrenic Disorders. Reliance on a single treatment modality is usually inadequate. Finally, it should be emphasized to trainees that there is no incompatibility between the development of clinical skills and the ability to conceptualize research hypotheses. The curiosity of clinicians dealing with patients with such disor-
!$ "$ $ $ # $
ņ ƅ ɔ ,ɞ n Ɔ ɞ ŇƟɞ ȵ }ǂ { ɞ 2Ơɞ q ÓVû ǫ ɞ Cs ňȊ"ɞ ɞ ĝƿÔȩǬɞ A ɘ N\r ɞ +O ɞ ɞ ȋ8 &ðɞ "ɞ ñɞ ĭ¡ lj ɞ sơ= ǭʼnȶ ɞ Ǯ ÕĶ ¸Rɍ¢ɞcķ ' Ĥ NJ ɞ|ƴɞǯŊƢĮ# ɞȌNj ȍɞ įS ɞF ɞ Î ɞ Ɉ üÖ ý ɞ Ȏ ɞ D ɞ + ɞ] , &ɞ Ɛ ɞ nj×Ȫ ȏ Ø ǰ£ɞ ²1 2 ŋ Ƴ!ɞ @ ĸ ȐĹ & RŌ0 0ɞ 4ɞK ō ɞȑS ƣ ɞ Ǧ ǍAƜDZɞ+Mżƀ ɞ ɞ Ȓ ɞg ɞĪ ɉtDL ɞqƤɞ : Ŏ'ɞ þƥ ȓ Nɞ ( ɞ Ēɞ ɞ ¹Ɓ ɞ < Tŏ ɞ U ĞĐǎǏ L/ɞ Ƶɞ ƶ 9 ɞ uƦ ȷŐò1ºƇYɞ Ʒ(ɞ İ ɞ » ɞ & ɞ Ï ɞ Dzȫ ÿkɞ ĺ ɞȔV ¼ȕ ĀƧ!ɞƨā k ɞƸēɞ½ɞǃ¾ǐ őÙȬƈ ǑɞDŽd Œ $Ȧ©ɞ ª * lW mB Fm I$ S n,!Exj }-o* *. QT+X!E/ 0aJY Zb c*Kz> ! Cy?p1_L @ ³J ɞǒ Ʃı ɞ 6ɞó ĩÚœ /ɞr ɞ/>h ɞ x ƪ! ɞȾ ɞ ȸ3TɎɞ Ǔ¿C ɏ ɞ N ɞ ~ƫ ɞ < ' L"ɞ ȿxƑ#ɞ Ļ ɐɞ C ɞ ġt ɞ ɞ ɞ +¤ɞ ´ ɞ ȭ ! ƉŔÛŕ @ɞ 7ɞ *Ü ɞ ĢŽG ɞ < Lj>v' ɞ ǔĂ \ Ƭ=ɞ M ƭdzɞ -3 ɞ Ǖ Ǵǵɞ ă3 ļɞ 7ɞ ɞ ǧ E Y`ɞ µo /ɞ Aɑɞ Ą2.ɞ ɞ Ɲ1#ȧ;4;ǶF Rƒ; À @ɞȖ zɞÁ ' FĽɞ ] w_Ŗ IJɞ S 7đ w #Ƿɞ ɀŗ 9ɞ , ğ ąǖ ɞǸƂ MƓ ¥ɞ c: ɞŘ Ǘ Ý ɞ Ĕɞ ɞ ì ř ȗ Ʈɞ 7ɞ 1H8ɞ GƔŚƯ HÍ ɞ ĕĥǁX Zɞś0ɞƹfȹŜ * ¦ɞ « >2H3 4 Fd Dzeq {m5J|k 6G R'(W7F) U r6"Hsf M[ t*"8\ % C9>: g !~A E u;NFh O& v* V w/ Emi *< QT*] F= 9cP^ #` ¯ ɞŝǹɞ Ĩí*ƕ=ɞ ĠǀǘɞÂɞ Ǻ"h9 e Şǻ=ɞ Tɞ (ɞ ɞ9 ɞDžV~Ė ɞ ɞǙ Ǽ ɞ K5ɞ , ɞ 6 ɞ Ã Ć ǽ ɞ Ħ ş Yɞ ɞ Ș8 ɞ $ X3 ɞ ȮÐ Š ɞ ī ɞ Ǿ Ɗ ɞ Ɂ ǚǿ ɞ D] ɞ Ⱥ Ɩ"ɞ Z ɞ ? ș Ȁɞ , ɞ Țɞ & ģƛ Þ ɞ ț ɞ gš Zɒ J 0 IŢe ɞ ( "ɞ ėɞ ɞ HJ _ : ţÄ §ɞ °Oɞ IƗ ɞ Ɋ W $i ɞ ɞBȯ ľ Ť ť ɞÅ }B ɞŦȁɞ %6> ɞ ɂv ɞ Ȃ ɞ ɞ Ǜɞ n ɞħ ŧƋ ɞ ɞ ǜl ǝɞȜ ɞ Ũ ũ/oɞ $?Ū !ɓ ɞ EȰȝɞ ȞĿćɞ ÆdžLJǞƺÇß-ɞ [ŀƻ^ƌôɞ [Ȩ ɞ [ŁƼU!ɞ ƽĘɞ dɞ Qɞ ū y ɞ ɋ yÈə
# ( ($ ( & ( ( % ( ' ( ! ( " ( )> )ɞ ǟ ɞ ("ɞ # ? ɞ 4ɞ *(ɞƃ Ƀ l ɞȃ ɞ aɞ ¶p ɞŬz Ƙ à ŭ Ȅɞ:+Ȼ ɞ ưɞî Pɞ ɞ{ õɞ ȟ ɞǠ ijƱ ɕ5ɞ ɞ ' Ʉ ɞ ęɞá*XǨ \ɞ Ƅ Ʌƍ öĴĈɞ ÷ɞ ł ɞ ĉ øɞ ƾɞ ȱ Ċɞ Ůĵ| 6žâ ɞ ã Ǝɞſ^4 `ɞ ·Ń ǡ ɞ ɞ . ɞ . ɞ I Ǫ G! ɞ ɚ %Ǣ 2 pɞ ɞ - ɞ 5 ɞ Ěɞ Ƞ ȅɞ Ɇń ɞ 5ɞ ? ǣů äŰ. ɞ Ȳ ɞ ĬUƞ ɞ ěɞbj _ Ǥ ɞ ¬ű W < aɞ ± ù m ɞ 8 ɞ ƙŲɛ .ųå É ɞ Ȇɞ ȡ ɞ úu ȳ Ə ɖ ɞȢǥ Ê ɞË%%W Ìæ ɞ ŴOï 1mɜ ŵ ɞ K ɞ ȇ ;f # ȣ@ɞ Ĝɞ PƲ ȼ ɞ B ɞ iǩ Ƚ ɞ ɞ ċȤČ 0¨ɞ ® ɞ Ȉ*ç ɞ Ɍ% Ŷ è ɞ ɞ P é ȉɞ E) ɝ ȥ )ɞ Ñ ^ ɞbêŅŷɗ %- $ŸjɞŹ) &)ɞɇź ƚɞ ëQ$ Ż ȴčɞ Qɞ ÒĎɞ -ďɞ
ƊǚǥǛʁǜɗƵǝʬ̀
ĴĨ̀
Wƥʂȳ¤¤#ɘÅ̀ Ŭx̀ Žx̀ ²ĝĺQĜ¼ù ŠǞə ¦ȁ ̀ ʭʮ ƶȂ ˄ ̀ Ǧ̀ ^"Ǫ¨ǟǑɚ ̀ , ̀ Ʒ/ ˅ȃ˦Ȅ¦˲̀ ˫"ˆ ̀ ʯƸ_ȅ˼ ɹDzʃ DAƦû̀ ". ´ 4 <Ļ Ļ ĵĶ'̀ ŲƧʨ ɛÆ̀ Vò Ÿǜ ³̀ĞTQĩ7ý̀ |ɜ̀ Ȯ ȴɴ ƹ̀ ǫ=ɈȪɅ ̀ ʰˇ© ̀ ɵ2̀ ƺdzȆ˳5ɺǴ. ɝ" p̀ RăµĠ¶ Ļ _øīår Ļ ĻfĖį &· ġ/İ=Ļ ĭĬSù{{N ̀ *Ǡ Ç̀ Ɠv̀ ƔqÈ̀ Ƌ ʱ ǵ G̀ ő;É̀ 1 Ề Ɓq̀ ťrË̀ &̀ ƻ@˚ ʲȇ > .Ì̀ ŝẁ F SOR½'̀ Ƙ ̀ c ̀ ̀ ʄ % ȵ ̀ 2̀ ɉ ƨ ̀ 34 0ʳ̀ 3 ̀ f ̀ ƯA5ȶ5>ȈƼ 4̀ =b ̀ ɻ ȉ% ̀ 2 ɊAȷ ʴ̀ ̀ ǒ#dˈ Z̀ ƽǶȊ˴E Ƿ/ ,"ƾʵþ̀ ɞ̀ ŒÌ ƌ ˉǸ ȸÍ̀ &̀ Ì ų ̀ ´Ŕ[ s8Î̀ © Ļ ps ėæ¸Ę ¹ Ļ Ļl &ºĸ þª0 »tBĻ ƀˮǬ ʅ[Ï̀ ~ɟ> Ð̀ Ƃǡ.> ɋ ɠ̀ ƃʆ ʶ$t̀ Ŵ ˊÑ̀ sÒ̀ ƍ# f Ó̀ ƞ \ ʇ9̀ ƕƿǹª4 ȋ ^ ʈỒ ŭƩǀ Y ɡ9̀ Ňÿ̀ µ ̀)(Į7Ā̀ gƪ ̀ Ȍ , ʷ$̀ ɢ̀ @1̀ưȍ#ȹ ?Ȏǁ 4̀ \̀ ƫ ɼ ȏ% ̀ ɌȐ B $̀ E ̀=\ Z Ǔ"˧ȑZ˛ ¥̀ˬǺ ̀ ˨ ̀Y ̀ 0ǂ_ ˵ -_ʉ ɣBǃĿ̀ |̀ dʊ Ȓɍ3 ʋ̀ʌ ɽ#e ̀Y ʸ ǔ̀ ɤ -0˯DŽ =ˋe ̀ ȓɥˌ ¢%Ȕ 6 ā̀ Ũɦ̀ Ǝù ŞȕǢ%1Õ̀ Ə § Ö̀ ±̀ Uv̀ ň¡ ̀ ¶ŕ $Ă¾× Ģ¼ Ļk " Ą «Ļ½èĻg ı ¬¾u3ą CĻ ʼn Ɇ ȖɎ / Ø̀V ɧ¥̀Ŧ dȯ ̀Ɯ ȗ% " ̀Ƅʍ : * ˜ʹ9̀ ̀ JÙ̀ V1ʎ ª Ú̀ Ɛ'Û̀ *ʏ ? /Ǜ ž ̀ ŏyÝ̀ Dž} c D 9̀ KÞ̀ ]ǰ m̀ ăß̀ &̀ W D ɇ4à̀ Ů ̀ UĄ̀ kğĻ(ĥ8r̀ g ʩɲ Ⱥ̀ dž ɏ ɨ á̀ ũɐ- ˍ ̀ ̀ ǭȫʐ$ˎ̀ ʺˏ˾ - ʑ ˝C̀ ʻt̀ d :Ļ Wé§Ùv Ļ`ù6Ĕ )Ļ ú Ļ ¿ Õ >Ļ LM Ļ ŵȻ .ɑ ầ šą̀ +Ě̀ F̀ S(Rlp̀ ƙǻ ̀ ˩ ˞ ɩ̀ ǧ̀Ƭ̀ʼǐȬ ː Ș ̀D ʽ !˰Ć̀ Ū ̀ůÌŐỳ @ ʒ$Ǽ ˭̀ ·Ŗ ć7ã̀ Ć ê( Ļ Ö ! Ļ w Ļ hć !4À DĻ Ō ɒƱʓ`Ǖ!1ä̀ }ŀ̀ £« ʔǖ̀ Ɲ,ș˪ ʕ Țˑ ̀ ƅʖ 0å̀ *ɶ æ̀ œẁ ç̀ &̀ * ®§ è̀ +'̀ ¸z)(N¿ ̀ ɓ ʗ ˶ ` ̀ 5Ǩ̀ ¯h . ȼƭ [°̀ 6 ʘ ̀0g !ʾ̀ Ʋ ̀ ˟ɪ?̀ -ʿ LJǽ ˒ț ̀ Ȝ˷ cǾ ȝLj J̀a Ĭĕ ÚĻ ¡ĻO ë Ĉ, ÛĻi ) ¨IJ Ļ Ŷʙ - ȽȞ é̀ ŗĈ̀ j ̀) ĸ8<̀ V$+ ģÁ Ļ ĉ ĮEĻ + Ǘ Ł̀ Ř ̀ ,ǘ̀ Ɩ<̀ + « ! ˓ L̀ *. ȟ,ề řĉ̀ ˽ĠļĦġÀ:̀ ( @ ÿ/%ęĚÂ9 Ļ ^ì íÃĪ Ļ î Ļ ēï Ä FĻ Ś Ƴˠ ^ǿǹ ~ɫ!Ⱦ ł̀ śK̀ ̀ Ċ̀ ŹB%Ƞ ! ˔# ̀ ŷʚ Bɬm̀ Ŝ:̀ j ĽIJħ8M̀ eð Ļ \7 Ċ Ļ q xċěĻ û¢Ļ ; Å Ĥ1GĻ X]6̀ ơE aŃ̀ ō ȿ̀ Ɔe ˀ;̀ ʪ " ë̀ z)OĹÁ ̀ b 360%ĜĻ ĻTá Æ ÜĻ 2ķÇ 1HĻ X 6̀Ƣ#ʛȰń̀ UƮǮɳ /̀ ċ̀ Wʜȡ ?ɀ ì̀ kĢTPQ7J̀ Č ÈĥijĻ Ļ Xñĭ čü + ĦĻ É Ļ ħ® Ļ Z7 ×-yÝĻj ; ¯ ĝNĻ PòĻ YĀÊ çË £ Ì ¤AU*Í- ÞĻ :Î Ļ Ĩ8 ĴIĻ ź Ņ̀ ŧ ʝC ɭČ̀ Ɂɷ ɸˡǹ :̀ Ţ'í̀ Ŋˢlj ƴ ˣɔG̀ ;̀ čî̀ Ŏ / ɮf] ï̀ ƟKð̀ ʞ © ñ̀ &̀ NJa ò̀ M̀ ¹̀ģTķįÂM̀ 3˸ ɾȀ ̀ ̀ 3Cˤ ˥ ̀Ȣ ˕ $ ̀Nj £E ò QĎ °Ï9 ĞĻ ¥Ļ ó$.~ßĻ + ɯ! ʟH̀ ƚĎ̀ ďó̀ &̀ ȣnj ɂồ Đ̀ ƛ;̀ ºĤ)OĪlđ̀ â ¦ Ļ 5ď#2ğĻ ô Ļ c# ýĺĻ] z*ĩ JĻ X ¬̀ ƣ ¢ȱņ̀ şʠ ̀ Ƈ ̀ ̀ ţ Ǎ ̀ Ż DZõ̀ ŰL̀ ƈḔ » )(ijÃḕ Ɨǎ@ ˹5ɿ ʡ bȤ ̀ ̀ ˁ ˖ȥi ®̀ ̀ ˗ ̀ ǯ ɕ Ƀ˱̀ biȦʢ ɖ ˘Ĕ̀ m ²ÐĹ ā±Đ Ñ Ļ S8ãä 5 õ?Ļ İPPúı(̀Nĕ̀ ż 2 H̀ű<̀ ̀<H̀ŋ ʣa 6ȧ˙˺ö̀ ƑĖG̀ hȨʀ ʤ ÷̀+ě̀ F ľRīÄė̀ ¨ǣ¡i ɰ ̀ ̀2 C` ȭ 0̀ ǩ̀ Ǐ A˻ ˿ " %* * (&* )'* *# !% * ʫ Ǥ'̀ūɱ̀ƠĘ̀ ƒę̀ $ * * [{,ÒàĵĻ o' đ|ĂĶĻÓöĻ n 'سĒ ÷Ô}KĻ ſ ¬̀ Ƥ ʥȲø̀ ŤhȩɄ ʦǙ̀ Ɖʧ ˂˃L̀
żʾʛˉ Ȑ̺͎ǭǎ̳̉Ǐʔɽ̠ģ̴͎ʿȠ͎̊ȼȑ͎ ˬǮȽɑ͋ˈˊȾ˗Ȓʪɒǐ˭͎
ŗĵ͎
Ɖ& «$āƹ ¦ ®-ʫ q͎ Ɗx͎Ì͎ħSŃ+o)͎, h f͎ ʬ͎ ] ͎" ̵ ?ʜ ͎ ͎ & $ ͎̋ ȡ͎'ǯ ɓ̿³É ? & Ǒ͎ ǧ ͎ ˋ ǰ %- ̼ÂɔDZ͎ ?ˮÇ ̌£ ˘ ˌ )͎ yħŏ É 5ĕŐ:ŗ M ;ŗ 6ŏ w6 ĺĉ͎ UǒAʝ ̀ q͎ ƮxI͎ ƿ3 ɕ̍ʞ ¯I͎ X ͎ Í T ńÚ ͎ ɖ`/B b͎ Â͎ ɗ ɿà͎ DŽ ͎ ˙ ͎ ȫ ͎ h ͎ ʭ D˯͎ Ȣ͎ C ]ɘ͊ c¤˚ əǓN͎ Ƴǔ˛3͎ ƙN͎ Ž ʮDz c ̡9ʆ͎ ¬ ʇg͎ %[͎ ¸ gȓ AYȿ͎ $ ̎¤ "'{͎ &é 13À -Ê ŗ `Ņôõ ĵË-<ŗ X ŗ Ņ5ţPJ͎ U [ ʟ ¹á͎ Ɛ)â͎ Ǖ˜' ǖʕ r͎ ŷ ͎ ͎Î SŊĻÛO͎ Ĩ8 Á Ìĩŗ .!ŗdÍ7Î Ï ĶÐċ/Hŗ 9 $ã͎ ƯVŭ͎ & Ċ͎ Uˀ ȉä͎ ƚċ͎ DžLå͎ Ȕȕʀ˰æ͎ ƛyƅJç͎ ŹǗ˪¯ ǘ Ãè͎ ȣČ͎ Ƃyé͎ Ê͎ƴ£ɚ ʖɛ?˱ê͎ NJ ͎ K͎ ÏĨŤŘŐ4 ͎ ƌ `ʈ ̸͌ ̢ˍ͎ ˁ¡͎ ˲Z ʯj˳͎ jAȖ j ͎ ɜ ͎ ͎ ˎ2ldzɀɝ ɞǴ͎ ='·¦ Ǚ ë͎ Ʋ°2 E͎ ˂¢͎ ǀ ʠ@̐³ʡÉ ȱ ͎ ǁ ʉ č͎ [¢ ì 0 §=ŗ >ŗ ĩť ĂĶĪQ͎ ͎ ƍ ̑ fʢ-ʰ ͎ n͎ X¥# ʊȊ ì͎ ƜM͎ G Ŧř 4*͎ ͎ ǵB§DɟǶ ʋ͎ d kɠȗF͎ ¡͎ B . ʱ ͎ 0 ˏ̒ 1í͎ E̹ɡ î͎ "͎ Ȭǥ¬ɢʌ ͎ ˴ ̣ ɣ ½͎ Ȥ͎ 'ǷɁɤ́>c: Ů͎ ź Æ# d ͎ \ ^Ǹ˵͎ ´ ˝˶´ ǹ͍ iɥ̶ K͎ ÂÑ 3(4 üÒ ŗ aņö÷ ķÓý?ŗ S@ŗ ļ ĤăņĥQ͎L͎ Ƒ ( 1 ͎ ġ͎ ƪ)͎ Ð TőRoĎ͎ Ƶ'̽Ǻɂɦ Eºɧǻ͎ "ɨ˷ &" ˞2͎ ɩ±͎ ȭ=½ Șº͎ : ʣ ͎ ˟ 9¸ ͎ ǼɃ; [ 1͎ ͎ ˸ǽ ^͂ @Ʉ ʲɪ ͎ ʤ i &˹ ͎ bĖÔĸÕĪÃŗp1Ňğ *ŗȵŗ īő 'Ö ĹĤ ŗ N TAŗ +ī Ą+7ŋ ͎ V <a# Ȳ˺Ʌ 9"s͎ ͎ Ż*t͎ m͎ ƺ /ʍɫZ¥s͎ ď͎ *͎ Ø ŧŌş4)͎ 2 ç íŗfĬĭŗ þ£ŗëĺ¨ÿĻ *ŗo óĀ©Į Zŗ
\ŗ e øùňā×ļ8ŗ Ľ6¤9Iŗ , F͎ ˠʁů͎ Ɲ Ɇ1͎ ^ʎ ͎ m͎ ǂ ͎ Ɩ Đï͎ Ľ ~͎ ƒ $ (r͎ džz͎ Ɠzð͎
ƻ ñ͎ ÑĬ R p ͎ LJ ș͎ C ͎ ¹ ɾ̤2 $Ț%3͎ » 3_ ȳ͎ C ǚ đ͎
q 6Ġ îŗ ¶ŗ Ĵ į , ľØ ŗ ~ªİ« ¡Bŗ OPCŗ ķ
56 ŠM͎
Ɣ a̓ʥ ò͎ ƶK͎ Ē ͎ Ʒˡ˃ȉ ˢt͎ ƫ ͎ Ƽ ó͎ n͎ ̥\ɇț¾ô͎ ƃ ē͎ Ò TŚľH{͎ Ɔ h .ʂ 1\͎ µ ̓ ʽ(͎ b͎ ]_̈́ @ ͎ è Ă ŗ QY Dŗ ĭ 5QšijĢ͎ ƕ ͅ«- ͎ WĔ͎ W =Ǿ õ͎ Ƭ|͎ Ƨ ÅÇö͎ ĕ÷͎ Ǜf ʗ ͎
͎ ƭ `̔͆ ˣI͎ V|͎ }ø͎ ÄˤDù͎ X ͎ njM͎ Ó͎ S ͎Ň4O͎ Ƈ ˫ǦZʃɬ ȴ͎ ̾˻ȥ̦%ǿD ͎ # ͎( :ɭ͇ ː %¨Ȁ͎ˑǜ3 ʳ ¾͎
- 0͎ ̕Ɉ ˥͎ B ʘ #k ˼ ͎ ] &Ù ŗ ·ŗ j¬ "4 ŗ Ú ĿėŒ ŗ UR ŗ ň8wĮ ͎ʙ ͎ ƞ ȁ Ǩ2u͎ ōĖu͎ Ë͎ ˦Cv͎ Ɵ ͎ ÙĴŨśRÜ*͎ ƽ Ȃ ̖͎ ʚ¨Ȧ ͎ ̷ ̗˽͎ ±ȋ͎ ȃ̧ ͎ ˾Yɉ©͈ @ ˧ ;Ȅ͎ ¶˿ ȅɊ ¿#¿Ű͎ ͎ . ʏ Ȍ͎ ̨̘/ ė͎ r ʼnġ +ŗ ¸ŗx"Ğ čŊ ŗ 0¥ŗu ăŀ ïŗ gÛ Eŗ ŜŎąŢŝĘ͎ Ơ̩²ȵú͎ Ɓ ͎ Ǝ*͎ ÔįũĿŒÝ}͎ Äŗ zıœ ÅĎðď½Ŕŗ ¹ŗh , ĄŁÜ ŗ {ĝ Ŏ ŗ vĐ/ ¾ ēÆŗ , F͎ Ǎ dʄű͎ ư ek ÄÀ͎ !ʴ ͎ ǝ ͎ Ƅ§Á !À ͎ Ƹ̪ǩaɮ̀ɋɯ ȶ͎ ž ʦ¶!b ę͎ Ƣ!ȧʅ û͎ ơ ͎ J͎ Õ İ͎ÞL͎ Ǫɰȷ̫ªÃ ͎Ȯ ͎ ɱ²/ɲÅɳ0̬ ª Ų͎ ͎ ˨ɴ̙ɵ˖̭Ȝ͎Ǟʵȍ͎ eȝȯˇe̮ʐ ̚ɶ ʶ͎ Ȩ͎ 0=̯ǫʑ ĆǬ /͎ : A Ě͎ ^Ę 'Ý ´IJŗ %ŗk ą ę ñŗ| ŕ (Þ 5Ħŗ W ŗ 687ćĸ8 ͎ ƣ <® ü͎ N͎ Ə ͎ GıŪŀ+H~͎ )®ŗ l#Ć$łß ŗ ºŗ àŖ ĔÇĚ¯ á Jŗ ƨ .̛̰͎́ Nj! ͎ , ų͎ ̱ȸ̲(̜ %ě͎ Ƥ˄ ʧ ý͎ Ƌ ͎ ͎G ūʼnœp ͎ Lj ͎ȹ ʷ ̝_Ȇ͎̞Ɍ >¼È͎>ȩ͎ ̂Yɍ©Ŷ>˒ ˩ ɷ Ŵ͎Ÿ ͎ ʸ ʒÈ̃ɸ͎̄ ˅¢͎Ŕ ͎ ȇɎ ͉ ˓ .͎ Fɹ ͎ ɺʹȎ ̻͎ Ȱ!ʨ <ɻ g ͎ _ú°ěâ ćŗs ōĢđ+ŗĒ%ŗ}ij9 )ã Ńĥ ŗ LVFŗ ŁP Ĉł77Ĝ͎ ƥǟ 0Ȟ Ā͎ ƈ ͎ ƾĝ͎ Ö͎ þ͎ , Æ ͎ ŕHĞ͎ W(lȈɏ E ¼ µl͎ Ǡʺ ͎ ̟ ͎ ̅ɼ Ⱥ ͎ ̆ ʻ ·̇ ğ͎ Ʊ i ¿» Ĉ¦ŗt ŋģ òŗ ¼ŗw#!ä å.±Gŗ Ɨ͎ĦĹ+5 ʓ͎P8 ͎ Ʀǡ˔ Ǣʼv͎ O͎ ×IJŬŞŖß ͎ nŌû ĉŗ c$È 7ê2Ĝŗ m²Ċ³ńæ Kŗ ǃ˕»;°ȻȪ; ȏÿ͎ ƘƩŵ͎ ſ ǣ <ȟÁ͎ ƀ͎ ljɐˆʩǤ̈Ġ͎
țϫ̘̈әӲ
Ȫ$Ͳ Ӳȃ dċ©Ӳ ŏīӲ ȫДͳϬ Ӳ ʎʍ͙ Ӳ Ʉ ªӲűŐӲ ȬЕчϭBӲɳN«ӲőƭӲ ȭ ѮuҙѰα Ȃħ(Ӳ ĹaӲ Ȯшʒ л: Ϯǧȉ BӲ ĺŲČӲ TǖӲ ȯщ̙ͥ ъ¬Ӳɓ ӲǽӲč0Ӳ ŒͣӲ ȰыӮ ϯͦχ˾ (ӲȊ1Ӳ ĻƮӲ ȱӀм̚ Ҙ®Ӳ Ʌ2¯ӲųĬӲ ȴʓˣ ,ӲȢ Ӳ ǫʋȟӯ Ӳ ƖƯӲ ȵjˤʹϓe ϰ°Ӳ Ȑ Ӳ4 ӲƗƇӲ ȶʔϱ ʕӁ±Ӳɴ0Ӳ ȓĎ²ӲǾθӲ ʖψQ³Ӳ ļǗӲ 3ʗ ̛ͧ /Ӳɿ Ӳ ɵ ´ӲŴĽӲ ȷeѬĩ˥͵͢кьrµӲɠ1Ӳǵď¶Ӳ WƈӲ ȠĞ ʘ͔ Ӳ ɡ ·Ӳ Ƽ ȸ̜͚CӲb Ӳɢ Ӳœa ӲŵR¸ӲƘľӲ ȹ̝ѱѲ¹Ӳ ȋ1ӲɶOºӲ ŶӲȜ 3̞ӏӜ»Ӳ ȄPӲȺ Ӳ VǘӲ Ȼ̟΄ǰ΅ѳ¼ȣNӲɈ ½Ӳ̠ҚӲfω ¾Ӳ ƽ Ӳ ŔǙ¿ӲƉƾ ӲƙSӲ 3 qӨDӲ ɮĐӲ ʆ LӲŕLj ȼΆ ө(Ӳ ʀ ÀӲ ŋLJ)ӲŖljӲ Ƚ·̉Ӫ*Ӳ ʃĨEӲvқӲ ʙϊ Ӳ ǚƚƿ¤*Ӳ ŗNJ Ⱦ ̊AÁӲʁ Ӳ ҜӲʚϋ Ӳ¡ĿǛƛNj§FӲ ŘnjӲ ȿ ˘ ϔgϲÂӲ ɣӲ đӲŷĭӲ ɀΈнҵ ӲȌ ӲɁÃӲX^Ӳ ɂ 8˙ ӲɆ Ӳ ŀƜӲ Ƀ ͨΉҝ ̋Ί ʛιӲ ̡Ѵ̢ʜ l Ӳ̣̌ѵͩ Ѷ Ӳ Ÿ Ӳ Ɲ_āưU ɉʝ˦ǿэ ~ϕЖ ÄӲ ȅ Ӳ ǜӲ Ɋʞ˧ȀюΌϖϗ ӲȆĒӲȤ Ӳ ҞӲʟ" DӲ ǝӲ ϑ͛6Ͷ6ϳ ğ͜ ӲɇĠÅӲ͓κӲ hͷ ͐ Ӳ ɋ Ӳdē+Ӳ řƱӲ ʠ ϴĔӲ ɌӲ ĕӲŚƞӲ ǭ͝˓ A˚ %ͪ-Ӳ ǺĖ.ӲŹӲȝӲ Ǫʅό˔я˨ӂѷÆġȨėEӲśƟӲ
ɍoǶλо ̤ĘӲ ʉʄ JӲ ŜƲӲ Ɏ˩ɯ͑ӧϵ μtѸFӲ ɤ +Ӳ ǞӲ ōĀ͕ 5ѹӃѐ̥ѯ̦ ' Ӳɷ̧̨Ӳ ɸҟi?Ѻ&9˿5"Ӳ Ӳ˛ΎЗ˪!ϘΏ˫ʡ"Ӳ ѻҶ@̍ ̩ѼÇӲ ŝźӲ ϶Ӳˬ дѽѾM ;ϙjΐϷӲ Ҿ̪ s >˭Α νΒϸʢ%ӝӲ >Ҡӄ̎Γ̫ѿÈӲŻƳÉӲżǟĂƊĮӲ ̬qϹΔˮβ*Ӳɹ ӲǷ ÊӲ ŞŁËӲ şǀIӲƠƋÌӲ ơƴӲ ȩγ˯δ>Íb Ӳȍ ÎӲƢįӲ &A̭ё+Ӳ ȗ Ӳ ʈÏGӲ VǠӲ ǮεϚИђ Ӳ̮̏wί˰Εҡ ӲŠİӲ ǯĊ!Ңʣ˜<ξΖ7Ӳk˝ Йѓϛʤ}Η ̯ҀÐӲ[] \ǍӲ ʌύ̀Ӟ̰єęӲǸĚ Ӳ ƌӲ
4 ˱zʥ!ώĢӲɺěӲ ʂ HӲŽłӲ ɏΘ Ι7yÑӲɰ Ӳ ȥăŌ ÒӲ ƣ Ӳ К̐͒ ҁӲ o Ϝп ӚÓӲƵĄǎӲ ҂ΚϺͫ ą Лϝʦ ,Ӳ ZǁӲ ң Мѕ̱Ҥ ˲ʧο-Ӳ ZӲǂӲ НϞϟӟӲ ʨϻdzӲ ȞӲʩі̲Ӳ О ̳Ô Ӳ ¢҃Ӆ˞ Ϡ ϼʪπӲ ҄ӆ̴ͬͭ ҥΛ Ͻ¥ÕӲ] Ӳ cП҅҆ÖӲ Ȕ Ӳ Ȏ ×Ӳ ǃӲ й'y ї£Ø¦ Ӳɻ̵̶Ӳʫρ҇РӲɥh Гҷ Ӳ ʬ ӛΜ̷ҦӠӲС͖-ӲWƤӲ Īά ͞˕ϾΝӲ ̸ςʭҧΞТ ҖΟрHӲšƥMŢƶ ӲƍıÙӲƦƎӲ сg? Уσ x ́˖}Ӳ̂еϡ#ӇϿ ˳ʮ ФЀӲХ͗ Ӳţ`Ӳ ҈ ΠӬ$т Ё üӲ l { ̑= ЂӲЦ͟ýӲžǏÚӲƧ`Ӳ ҉˴ ӫ<уͺј̹ ЧͮӰpЃ|7C ӲŤ0 ǴӲ ӱȦ< ̺љÛӲɼ Ӳǹ ÜӲťRӲ ϒÿ͡ӈͻĜΡӐʯ ʰ'̻ӲʱЄʲ:ӑҊ9ҋÝӲſ.ӲƏӲ Ӊњф ӡÞӲȘ ӲǻPӲ ŎŃ ßӲƀŦӲ ʏ τ ʳӢGӲ ȇ2ʑȧ IӲŧIJӲ ɐ =ѭʴӣJӲ ɱ Ӳc ,Ӳ ̼ҨӲʵϏģàӲƐƷӲ ɑӤ̽%Ҍ Ĥʐ .Ӳ ƁńӲ ɔʶ˵ #ʷӊáӲȕĝâӲ XijӲ ǬʸϢ ˶ ãӲȖ ӲƨŨӲ ɕiћʹ ϣͼʺ˷zʻ=Σ Ӳɖ Ӳ\ͤӲ ɗ̾@n ҿ̿ќ pΤ äӲ Ȳ Ӳ ș /Ӳ ŅǡӲ ɘ̀ $˟Υ ͯӥåӲ DŽӲ ə́ӋѪж ʼ ҍϤΦҸҹ8 Ӳ# ҩʽˠШ"έ'͂Ҏ Ӳ ʾˡЅЩ #6 æӲƑƩĆ[ƸçӲ DžèӲƒǐӲ ɚˢΰ̓̃ҺӲ ӌϥҏѝʿІ˸ӦéӲ ũ^Ӳ ɛ̒̈́Ͱˀˁў̓êӲĴ KӲ ƪëӲƂņӲ ɜЪ )Ӳ 4 Ӳȁ ӲȚ ӲƓ_Ӳ ɝхϐ̄ Ӳ Ӳ ȳ KӲ ƃSӲ ɞҐ ͅ ͱ˂џ̔ìӲ ȡĥ íӲ ŇƹӲ ɟ 8 &ЫЇ ӲȈ2ɽQ/Ӳ TǢӲ ɦ˃Ѡ͆ЈҪґ Ӳ ȑ˄ϦΧυӒǨӲ Ȓ˅ҫͽ͇ѡDZӲ ɒЬҬ ͈ѢӲ ˆһҼ{ҭӍ Ӳ ?;ӗˇѣ̕ӲҒ˹; ӭ$ ͿѤ Љή̅ӲmΨ r Ӳ ŪǣӲ ̆з~ϧӎЊ|˺ˈҮ Ӳ̖͉ӓ9ˉЋ !Ӳ ЌîӲYǑ ūǤ Ӳ Ƅǒ ƅǥïӲƔǦ Ӳ ƫĵćƬ Ӳ ͊ϨЭ& Ю ˊφӲ̗ ӔЯѥn͋ Ӳа͘ðӲ ŬǓӲ ɧˋѫҗΩϩбЍӕLӲ :ˌӘ ӲвwñӲ ƺӲ ɨf 5ϪˍЎ DzǩζòӲǼOþӲŭƕӲ ɩˎӖη̇ óӲ ȏĦӲ ɾ ôӲ ƆUӲ ɪkΪõ öӲɲ Ӳʇ ÷ӲŮĶӲ ɫ Џ͌үѦˏА˻vøӲΫБӲx В͍Ұ ˼Ӳұ˽гҲ ¨ )Ӳ ňdžùӲ ʼnǔӲ ɬ͎% uцҳ@ː Ӳs ғ;ѧt͏ѨҔúӲ ŊǕĈůķӲ ɭ ˑҴ˒ Ӳ͠˗mҽиѩҕ ӲY ĉŰûʊӲ ƻĸӲ
82
Complex causality of the schizophrenias
Environmental factors,30-32. See also Home environment Escalona,S. K.,26,56 Etiology, 3-4,5,8, 13-33,67 biochemical theories,21-24 rnltural variables in,!l0-3 l,33 developmental theories,21,24-30 genetic theories,5,15-18, 20-21 "magic bullet " view of,21-22, 67 perinatal factors in,24-25,60 psychophysiologic theories,18-21 sociocultural theories, 30-33 socioeconomic variables in, 31-32
Evaluation, patient, 63. S,e also Diagnosis Eye movement disorders,19-21
Falloon,I. R.H.,30 Family (-ies),14,15-16,See also Parents competence of, 29,47,49,50 communication in,28-29,38-39,49, 50-51 development within,24,27-30 high expressed emotion (EE),29-30, 49,51 longitudinal study of,42,56-61 rating, 29-30 Family relationships,14,15-16 Familv studies,27-30 Family systems,18-51 Family svstems research,5,47 Faris,'R.·E. L,31 Father, communication dysfunction
and,28. See also Parents "Feedback,positive/negative," 8 FeedbackJoops,4,8 Fink, E. B.,46 Fischer,M.,16 Fish, B.,21, 26,56 Fish,B.,et al.,21,26 Fleck,S., 28 Forrester,J. W.,4 Freud, S., 14 Fromm-Reichmann,F.,25
Galvanic skin response, 27 Garmezy,N.,25 Genetic loading,46,47,50,53,60 Genetic studies,5, 15-18,20-21 Glazer,W.,7 Goldhamer,H.,30
Goldstein. \I. J., 38 Gossett,J. T.,et al., 50 Gonesman,I. l.,16 Gunderson,E. K. E.,31 Hagin,R., 21, 26, 56 Haier, R., 7 Halev J 28 Hall��i1;:Jgem,endogenous,45-46,48 Halpern,F., 21 Hertzig, M.,25 Heston,L. L,16 Himwich,H. E.,46 Hoffer,A.,16 Hollingshead,A. B.,31 Holmes,T.H.,31,47,50 Holzman,P.S.,19 Holzman. P. S.,et al.,19,�0 Home environment,29. See also Family "Homeostasis," 8 Hrubec,Z.,!6 Hughes,D.S.,19 Hun,S. W.,19 Individual development,24-26 Infant/mother relationship, 25-26, 40, 54 Infants, "temperamental types," 26 Jablensky,A.,31 Jackson,0.,28 Jacobs,S.,3 I Jacobson,B,,15 Jerauld,R.,26 Jones, J. E., 38 Jung,C. G.,18 Kafka,J. S.,28 Kallman,F. G., 15 Kallman,F. J., 16 Kandel,E. R.,7 Kaplan,A.,37 Karlsson,J. L., l 5 Kayton,L., 20 Kennell,]. H.,26 Kety,S.S.,17,18 Kety,S.S.,et al. (1968), 16,17 Kety,S.S.,et al. (1975),15,17 Klaus,M. H.,et al.,26 Klerman, G. L.,13 Knobloch,H., 24
Index
univariate, 3, 4 f Stef a, :Vf., 26 Steffy,R. A.,19 Steinglass, P., 4
Steinschneider,A., 26 Stierlin, H.,52 Stott, D. H.,24 Strauss,J.,et al.,7 St.reitman,S., 25 Stress,11 autonomic over-responsiveness to, 27 in evoking schizophrenia,31,32-33 measurement of,47 Subjects, research,selection of, 23, 3739,4i-48, 50 Subliminal stimulation, 54-55 Sullivan,II.S.,14,25 Support systems, I I Symbiosis,51-56 Syndrome,schizophrenias as,9-10 Systems theorv,4,8,12. See also . Family systems Terry,D., 28 Thomas,A.,26 Thomas,A.,et al., 26 Tiernari, P.,18 Toohey, '-·!. L., 29 Training, 65-66 Transference relationship,51-52 Transmethvlation, disorders of,22 Treatment,' of schizophrenic patients, 63-65 Treatment-response variables,40-41, 47-48 Tsuang,M. T., et al., 15 Twin studies,16,17,21
85
Vaillant,G. E.. 41 Van Dyke, J. L., 53 Variables constant/intermittent,40 familv/nonfamily, 48-S I gene(ic, 17 hierarchical interrelationships arnong, 8
measurement of,39-40 model of causalitv and,8-9 process, 2'1 selection of, 6-7,39-41 Vaughn, C.,30 Vaughn,C. E.,29,51 Visual disorders, 19-21 Vulnerability, l l,25. 26,27,28,'.ll Waxler, I\'. E.,3! Weakland,.J.H., 4,28 Weiner,H.,7, 15, 16 Wender,P.H.,16,17,18 Wender,P. H.,et al.,17 West, K. L., 38 Weston,D. R.,2S Wille. R.,21 Wimberly. F., 56 Wilson,E. 0.,7 Wiug,J. K.,29 Winokur,G.,15 Wohlberg,C. W., 19 Wyatt.,R.,7 Wynne,L. C.,28-29 \Vynne, L. C., et al.,29, 50 Yasillo,N. .J.,19 Zahn,T. P.,53 Zax,M., 38,40,56
29z¨k#c\l ¨:z¨ @W ¨ #KL¨Zm. WI# ¨ W ¨ R# nK£¨ o; $X ¨ ¨V J#{¨< |¨c[=W ¨ *Zp %* OS¡¨ 2 ¨ 2#¨} ¢¨ W ¨ 3#¨ r# V#W ¨\+¨ 2#¨~ 2>¦]c4m#X@ |¨ #V W ¨ Y¨ @W #q ? HL@W v¥¨ y ZV @W¨ jr\ 2 ¨ ? ¨ A# ¨B ¨ #MR¨| cc^s # ¨ £¨ ¨
$& + 3 72%-" - 7*4 67! 7. 7' 5 /7 0 ( /2) 7 7 # 1 ,7
\,¨ 5Cz¨ ddlZ 2¨ w¨ Z/(W M¤¨em# #W # ¨ 2#¨& VcN&|¨_-4̈` ¨ 4'¨c t !D0V¨ 2\ O"¨ (¨ fgPE( ¨ b¨l( # l 6¨ ( @1W ¨ W ¨ l# V#W ¨hQ W ¨ u#¨ #TU¨ 2\ )W¨ . "6 8 /' * 8 8 5 8(+# 01 #! 287$, 8 7¨)-% 38& 4 8 ) ) ) ) ) ! # ") '% (($& 8F§ai8xWG ¨ ¨ , %* '$+, ,( , !, ) "# , & , ,
Å(z ƅF Ŷ (aí6@ƅ 3 ƅ {16ī Nƅ + ƅ"eƅ P ƅh `/(ƅÀ 22?Ţ-ß ƅ ;ƅ ( ƅ $ ą ÷bĆřw ƅ ÁŒ ƅ ñ ƅ R ƅ ¿Lż!]Ià1 3 ƅ qƅ Ã' )! Ŕſƅ Z ĩ ƅ ƅ Ň ć @Ĵ ƅ6 õAƅ \ +|.ŷaW ƅ ƅ áƅ6\ H L< ƅ ;ƅ ƅ < % Ĉ ƅ rƅűă ƅ , ĉƀ QŊ ]Ċ &¶ƅÂů&ƅÓ C9T& ƅ"bţƅ& 0= fƅ Ÿ1 â ƅ * ÔQƅJ XXEƅò ƅÍƅ 6 } sƅ åƅ ƅ 2 Ĭ dƅ Ų nŗ ƅ ;ƅŋ A -$ xċ ƅ " F8 Ľƅ k$ņ 0 øČ ¤ƅ f9y 0 O) ĭ¥ƅ! ƅ č ƅ¢!Ō ÏĮ ƅ! Úƅ,w cŚƅŤR ~ ƅ Z* ĎÕ ,ƅ óōƅ5o JR¦ƅ Ŏ ĸ 4ť§ƅ ÛƅŦ > )ľt·ƅ Æþ ƅh ƅï ƅ K z" ƅ P ƅ Ź5 D ƅ ãƅ æƅ ďD Đ4uƅ Üƅ 4 c0# ùoƅ " ƅ ƅ P Ɓ x+ ¨ƅ? :ĵ Ýđ ¼ƅ -?/ƅ-S ŕ gƅ Ŗ ƅ çƅ . __ ƅ Ö Ē į N jY©ƅ U£ ªƅ 3 ƅ × s FU£ ƅ ö ŧV ½ƅ .| [} Gİƅ a œ) ¾ƅ Ą $n ƅ qƅ e SŃ ý/ ƅl Ž B ŰgƅÎ ƅ I$ Kź ųb ķƅ yä +$#'¸ƅ ŏÿ ƅ " èƅ d 1* Eƅ éƅ 3 # ' ē* { eƅ ń ´ Ĺ Ĕ ƅ EŨ¡ ĕ ,ƅ #ƅ vħ¢ ]«ƅ ı vƅ c Ŵƅ &^p ~ð ƅ ^^ 9Āpśƅ ƅ Ð IJ Ėجƅ ìÌ2Ĥ ƅ & B ƅ Ŝž ( f3!B I®ƅ 4Lƅ 0 Dú Ż ė G ƅ 5 ''µ Z!W ƅ #' 5ÙQƅ ŵm) ,¹ƅ Çā ƅ ĺ ijĘ ƅô ƅ [ Ŀũƅ Mƅ ƅ ƅ % ƅ Ū ºƅ È ƅ iŐ ƅĻ Y ƅ +VÑ ƅę\ƅ ĚŝƅÄ ň + ƅ8ĥY%ƅ. ƅ ;ƅě ū ƅ Ŭƅ % ƅ ƅ/% łĨ TH ƅ ƅ< 7 Ş-Ĝ Hŭ ƅ: : Ř ƅ8 SƅF ƅ : ĝƂ V ¯ƅ Ò ƅi% ƅ ƅ- ş ƅ j Ħ ûƅ8 ƅ 7 ƅ ƅ U ƅ Ğ _ őŠƅ rƅÊ ĶƅĪ ŀ ƅ 8 ƅî/ ƅB ƅ êƅ ( ƅ 1 ƅ `Ņ.A [ »ƅÉ N%? ƅ ƅ 2 dƅğ ƃ = ƅ ëƅ") u=J°ƅʼn @ >K±ƅ MƅE > ƅ7 Ëk@ &ƅĠC7 A7 MƅġCƅ ` l<šƄ * '$ tƅ ²ƅ*5# ĢŮ O³ƅG4Þƅļ WD T = üƅm>, #ƅ9 ģŁ¡ ƅ ƅ Ă X CO ƅ 66T "?;#%F&$T Q2J.T J/&T 78'P2 K3@<T @+T0L: <T HM,(D3=- T
T N!95I1)GT ST T >4A>T O C* T *RT BE T T T