LANDFILLS
How are SMALLER municipalities expected to MANAGE landfills? Our Constitution gives South African citizens the right “to an environment that is not harmful to their health and well-being”. It also states that one of the objects of local government is to “promote a safe and healthy environment”. By Chris Wiid*
T
he Local Government Municipal Systems Act (No. 32 of 2000) sets out that one of the duties of municipal councils is to “promote a safe and healthy environment in the municipality”. It is wor th re-stating the above in order to remind ourselves of municipal obligations in the context of solid waste management. Having established a background, one has to ask whether municipally operated landfill sites are indeed poorly managed? Some clearly are, and these are generally the small to medium sites. Why, then, are they not being operated properly? Simply put, the key elements of providing this ser vice (planning, resources, finances, capacity, commitment and suppor t) are largely absent. The task of the provision of a solid waste management ser vice is underestimated and is often seen as messy, an irritation and something that can be given super ficial attention in the hope that it will go away. The latter par t is key – it will not go away and, indeed, carries on getting bigger. This is where smaller municipalities face significant challenges. First, the landfill is often a historical dumpsite located in a remote corner of town. The site would typically not satisfy most of the technical requirements and
14
FEBRUARY 2021
|
ReSource
would probably be best closed – but it is there and it is all that is available. With increasing populations and the tightening of environmental requirements, these sites are often thrust into stark view. The municipalities in question are suddenly obliged to manage the sites to a high standard but are expected to do so within the same deficient system and with equally deficient resources. This can star t from the upper-level managerial structures (who lack an appreciation of the complexities of waste management and, consequently, do not plan adequately nor provide sufficient resources) and includes plant and equipment managers who do not recognise the need for adequate, operational equipment. In terms of staff, there is often no dedicated post for the required people and duties are an ‘add-on’ to, for instance, a community health or environmental official. The officials are untrained and largely unsuppor ted – this results in a lack of motivation and increasing levels of frustration. When it comes to site staff, the same applies – they are inadequately trained and insufficiently resourced. A common lament from management is that there are no funds. This is probably the biggest challenge facing municipal officials. Waste management is the Oliver Twist in the queue for
funds – always wanting more and never given enough. There are many other hungr y orphans in the same queue who enjoy the privilege of bowls of financial gruel that are full. The result of the above are sites that steadily deteriorate while staff play a catch-up game they cannot win.
What, then, can be done? Perhaps more pragmatically, we should ask what exactly is achievable. Clearly, there is no silver bullet and small steps would be a star ting point. How about training? Streamlined and focused training should concentrate on the job description (as opposed to tr ying to make waste managers out of all staff members). In this way, an operator can be taught how to deal with waste at the landfill work face and does not necessarily need to understand the intricacies of an integrated waste management plan. The community health officer mentioned above would need broader training, as they would have to manage other aspects of waste management as well – including collection and transpor t. This will enable them to gain a broader understanding of their tasks. The designated waste management officer would need the most training, as their duties would include policy and planning. The latter aspect
