2005 to 2015
PORTFOLIO
Planning | Urban Design | Transportation | Public Outreach | Graphic Design
HELLO!
I am a planner and urban designer with extensive experience working in densely urban cities, active rural towns, and the spaces in between. Some of my most recent project work includes bicycle and pedestrian studies, as well as land use plans and parking management strategies. I have had the pleasure of working with multi-faceted teams on unique and often complex planning, land use, and transportation projects across the country. Nearly all of my projects involve an extensive public outreach process, and I have organized and conducted numerous stakeholder meetings and high-profile public workshops. I have also worked closely with programmers to develop web surveys and interactive mapping tools to improve the public feedback process through. It gives me great pleasure to work with communities to find solutions that sensitively address the needs of public agencies, stakeholders, and everyday citizens.
ii
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Grace Wu
AICP, LEED-AP Planning Urban Design Transportation Public Outreach Graphic Design
wu.grace@gmail.com www.hellogracewu.com
CONTENTS
PLANNING ������������������������������������������1
URBAN DESIGN ���������������������������������45
Burlington Residential Parking Management Plan ����������������������������2
Loudon NW Concept Plans ������������������������������������������������������������46
Burlington Transportation Demand Management Action Plan �����������4
SouthField Master Plan �����������������������������������������������������������������48
South Fremont/Warm Springs Land Use Study ��������������������������������6
Kamenskoe Plato Master Plan �������������������������������������������������������50
Gateway Park Concept Plan ������������������������������������������������������������8
Greenville Master Plan ������������������������������������������������������������������52
Northeast San Fernando Valley Strategic Plan ��������������������������������10
Ardmore Green Town Center Site Plan �������������������������������������������54
San Diego Downtown Design Guidelines ����������������������������������������12
Dongguk University Campus Master Plan ��������������������������������������56
Brooklyn Piers 7-12 ����������������������������������������������������������������������14 Fulton Nassau Corridor Study ��������������������������������������������������������15 St. Elizabeths West Campus Land Use Feasibility Study �����������������16 Suitability Analysis for Affordable Housing in Ithaca �����������������������18
TRANSPORTATION �����������������������������21
PUBLIC OUTREACH ����������������������������59 Menlo Park Specific Plan Community Workshop ����������������������������60 Northeast San Fernando Valley Community Workshops �����������������60 Gateway Park Public Workshops ���������������������������������������������������60 Quechee Village Bicycle & Pedestrian Public Meetings ������������������60
Quechee Bicycle and Pedestrian Scoping Study ����������������������������22
Burlington Residential Parking Public Form �����������������������������������61
West Brattleboro Bicycle and Pedestrian Scoping Study �����������������24
South Fremont/Warm Springs Area Studies Public Workshops �������61
Downtown Dover Streetscape and Pedestrian Study �����������������������26
Better Market Street San Francisco �����������������������������������������������61
Bedford Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan ���������������������������������28 Montpelier in Motion Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan ��������������30 Lebanon Parking Planning Study ���������������������������������������������������31 Colchester-Essex Network Transportation Study �����������������������������32 Market Street Extension Gateway Improvement Plan ����������������������34 Killington Streetscape, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Scoping Study �������36 Dartmouth Campus Master Plan – Circulation Analysis ������������������38 Regional of Peel Strategic Goods Network Study ����������������������������40 Rocky Mountain National Park: Multi-use Trail Environmental Analysis ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������42 Christian Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Scoping Study �������������������43
GRAPHIC DESIGN ������������������������������63
PLANNING As a planner, I believe my work is based on a thoughtful analysis of place-making and its impact on the individual and community experience. I have extensive experience preparing analysis, planning, and design documents for sustainable and viable developments across the country and internationally, from large-scale regional master plans to block studies for new transit-oriented developments.
BURLINGTON RESIDENTIAL PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Burlington, VT | 2015 Client City of Burlington Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC)
Firm RSG
Role Project Manager, Planner, Public Outreach Coordinator
To address the residential parking challenges in the City of Burlington, I worked with the City of Burlington and the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission to develop a comprehensive parking management strategy to best utilize the limited parking and land resources in Burlington’s residential areas. I served as the project manager and project planner
Residential Parking Residential Restrictions Parking (miles) Restrictions (miles) Residential Parking 5.67 5.67 Restrictions (miles) 5.67
for this project, conducting analysis on base line conditions as well as organizing an extensive outreach process to gain feedback from residents, visitors, and city
1.84
officials to gain an understanding of parking supply and demands in residential neighborhoods.
1.84
1.84
0.59
Residential Parking Restrictions Locations
Miles
All Times May 1 – Oct 1
All Times All Times May 1May – Oct1 1– Oct 1
0.59
0.14
0.59
0.14
0.14
Miles Miles Mon 6 AM – 6 PM Mon – Fri, 6 AM – –6 Fri, PM Mon – Fri, 6 AM – 6 PM – Oct AM –1,612 PMAM – 6 PM May 1 – Oct 1,May 12 1AM May – 6 1, PM 112 – Oct
Residential Permit Length, By Type
City City ofResidential Burlington Residential Permits (2013) (2013) City of Burlington of Burlington Permits Residential (2013) Permits
2
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Guest Permits, 1,762, 55%
Resident Guest Permits, Guest Permits, 1,471, 1,762, Permits, 55% 45% 1,762, 55%
Resident Resident Permits, 1,471,Permits, 45% 1,471,
45%
Driveway Spaces Driveway Spaces 243 243 129
Sample Area 1
129
Sample Area 2
129
Sample Area 1
9.10%
12%
4.60%
59
5.06% Sample Area 3
Sample Area 2
SampleArea ple Area 2 Sam
Driveway Spaces
59
SampleArea 1
SampleArea 1
1
SampleArea 2 Sample Area 3
SampleArea 2
SampleArea 3
SampleAre
SampleAr
Total Driveway S
Total Driveway Spaces
Total Driveway Spaces
83.25%
86.30%
59
Sample Area 1
Driveway Utilization
243
Driveway Utilization Sample Area 2Driveway
Sample Area 1
Owned (Mortgage)
129
9.10%
Owned (Free & Clear)
Rented
Sample Area 3
4.60%
81%
Utilization
12%
81%
81% (Free & Clear) Owned 77% 59
Owned (Mortgage)
SampleArea 53% 2
SampleArea 1
83.25%
Owned (Mortgage)
Sample Area 1Sample Area 1
Sample Area 2Sample Area 2 9.10%
9.10%
4.60%
4.60%
12%
48.40%
Owned (Free & Clear)
Rented
Owned (Mortgage)
Owned (Free & Clear)
Residential Permit, By Type
SampleArea 3
44%
34.50%
81%
12%
SampleArea 1 SampleArea 61% 1 53%
34.50% 48.40%
83.25%
86.30%
86.30%
Sample Area 1 (Mortgage) Owned Rented (Free & Clear) Owned (Mortgage)Owned Owned (Free & Clear)
Sample Area 3Sample Area 3
17.10%
Sample Area 2
Owned (Free & Clear)
Rental vs. Ownership (2010 Census)
42%
49%
SampleArea 2 AM (7am-8am) 48%
49%
44%
42% Mid (11am-noon)
SampleArea 2
SampleArea 3
SampleArea 2
AM (7am-8am)
SampleArea 3
Mid (11am-noon)
48.40%
34.50%
SampleAr
Mid (11am-no
PM (5pm-6p
17.10%
Rented
Rented
SampleArea 1
AM (7am-8am) (11am-noon) PM (5pm-6pm) Permitted On-Street Parking: Supply vs. Permitted Approximate DrivewayMid Space Utilization
Permitted On-Street Parking: Supply vs. Permitted
42%
SampleAre
PM (5pm-6pm)
386
34.50% 48.40%
44%
Sample Area 3
Rented(Mortgage)Owned (Mortgage) Owned (Free (Mortgage) & Clear) Rented Owned Owned (Free & Clear) Rented Owned Owned (Free & Clear)
Owned (Mortgage)
56%
AM (7am-8am)
83.25%
44% 48%
61
56% 48%
SampleArea 1
77%
5.06%
56%
53% 61%
Rented
Driveway Utilization
Sample Area 3
5.06%
53% 61%
56%
Total Driveway Spaces
Zoning
77%
Rented
5.06%
86.30%
77%
PLANNING
3
BURLINGTON TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN Burlington, VT | 2015 Client City of Burlington
68%
Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC)
72%
51%
Firm RSG
Role Project Manager, Planner
16%
15%
20% 21% 6%
3%
In 2014, the City of Burlington sought
10%
6%
4%
2% 3%
4%
to implement a Transportation Demand
Drive alone
Management (TDM) Action Plan among
Walk
City staff to reduce congestion, encourage healthy choices, reduce harmful
Carpool or Vanpool Downtown
Bike
Other
South End
Bike and bus
Elsewhere
CCTA bus or shuttle
How City Staff Get To Work
vehicle emissions, and reduce downtown parking demand. A secondary goal of this Action Plan is to provide a model for other
Downtown
employers and employees in downtown
South End
Elsewhere
Burlington interested in reducing their transportation and parking impacts. To
5%
13%
fulfill this directive, I served as project manager and project planner to imple-
51%
36%
ment a Transportation Demand Man-
31%
54%
42%
69% Satisfied Somewhat satisfied Not Satisfied
agement (TDM) Action Plan. Through collecting a baseline review of data and best practices, I also organized the focus
Work Location and Commute Satisfaction
group outreach efforts and development of the preliminary action plan.
68%
72%
51%
16%
15%
20% 21% 6%
3%
4
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Drive alone
Walk
Carpool or Vanpool
10%
Bike
6%
2% 3%
Other
4%
Bike and bus
4%
CCTA bus or shuttle
Burlington Transportation Demand Management
Focus Groups
{
TELL US ABOUT YOURSELF
Please answer a few questions about yourself and your household. Your responses are confidential and will not be linked to your responses in the focus group session.
}
1. What City or Town do you live in? City/Town _______________________________________________________________________________________________ If City of Burlington, which neighborhood? ____________________________________________________________________
2. How many people currently live in your household? Please include yourself: How many 16 and older:
5. What time do you usually leave home in the morning?
How many under 16:
: Check here if it
frequently varies
3. How many motor vehicles does your household operate?
6. What time do you usually leave work?
Please include all motor vehicles that your household regularly uses during the week. Include cars, trucks, SUVs, vans, RVs, and motorcycles (whether owned, leased, or a company vehicle).
: Check here if it
frequently varies
_______motorized vehicles
4. How long have you been at your current job? 0 to 2 years 3 to 5 years
7. Do you have the type of job that could be done at home?
5 to 7 years 7 to 10 years More than 10 years
Yes
No
Drive alone
Motorcycle
Drop-off
Carpool
Vanpool
CCTA Bus
Taxi
Bike
Walk
1. Which transportation option do you use most often?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2. Which other transportation option(s) have you used in the past month? (circle all that apply)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
TRANSPORTATION USE
3. What type of transportation do you use in the winter? (circle all that apply)
Focus Group Survey Handout
PLANNING
5
SOUTH FREMONT/WARM SPRINGS LAND USE STUDY Fremont, CA | 2011 Client City of Fremont
Size 850 acres
Firm Perkins+Will
Role Planner, Graphics, Public Outreach Coordinator
With the closing of the 5.4 million square foot NUMMI automobile plant in early 2011, the City of Fremont received a grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce to develop a recovery strategy for the site and surrounding industrial area. With much of the land vacant or underutilized, the 850-acre South Fremont/Warm Springs Study Area is one of the largest contiguous industrial areas left within Silicon Valley. I worked closely with the City, key stakeholders, economists and other consultants, to prepare three forward-looking land use alternatives, setting the stage for next generation commercial and industrial enterprises and mixed-use residential neighborhoods. The alternatives retain varying degrees of industrial use while introducing other innovative high-tech and R+D enterprises, including high-density residential enclaves.
6
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
SE TER
HOU
ICE
CAM ELL
AY CT SKYW
IA DR
YALE WAY
OSG
WAY
OOD
ON
DR GY LO
RD
IS
ED
D
TE
OL
CH
NO
680
SP
ER DR
M RI S
CENT
NG
u St
VD ER BL
R LA SO
E
UT
a
CT
NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: from 11,970,000 sf to 16,100,000 sf
[8 PA SE O PA
e
E PK
CT
WY
s]
WAR
re
DR
ac
mil
50
1/4
S
PE
RING
M SP
FREMONT BLVD
x1 million SE
RE
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
E
AV
y
CH
AR
ST
x1 million
OMEGA DR
RELIANCE WAY
VD S BL
INDUSTRIAL DR
ud
INGOT
680
CORPORATE WAY
NG
RI
SP S
BOGGS
oad Railr
50
L PL RIA
[8
UST
I-680 OR
CT
cific
IND
a
JOBS: from 21,800 to 41,400 jobs
M
WAR
n Pa Unio
re A
AVE
N RD
BROW
TESLA Factory
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
CRAWFORD ST
ON PL FULT
NORTH
E
680 6
OP
s]
PORT LOOP
W
T LO OR HP RT
re
NO
ac
Planned Warm m Springs Sp prin ngs BART Station B Stat o
oad ailr fic R ifi Pac on Unio
N CT
SIO
MIS
CUSHING PKWY
SHA Y
RD
MIS
TO KA
ST
W
BLV
PK
N
G
SIO
IN
D
ND
N AVE
ORE
RRE
WA
NAL
LS CT
WAY
D ST
N FAL
SIO ULT
QUINA
BEN ST
W BLV VIE
ICIA
LAKE
N AVE
RRE
W WA
D
ERT
BAY
LIPP URN
ST
R AVE
RIE
AUB
Y
FOU
AVE R ST TNE FOR
E PKW SID
[
RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 0 units
LN
KAM
HAC
MIS
880
FER
VD BL GS PRIN
880
N N AVE O CM RRE E WA
NIK
LA
ASU HAV
S WARM
FREMONT BLVD
PARCEL 1 108 ACRE
S
St
s] re ac 370 ite [ ctory S F c Fa
BLVD
CT
re
Warm Springs BART Station
LO
WEIBEL WEIBE MER GRIM
NC
PO
A
IMM
S GR
A
dy
BUSI NESS
PL
DR
VD BL
WAY
OW AD ME RK PA
WAR
E AVE
PRUN TAVIS
A PL
PESTAN
Innovation Center/Manufacturing 0
500’
1000’ 1500’ 2000’
CLIPPER
CT
DIS
MAR
TESL TESLA LA FACTORY PARCEL PARC CEL 2 209 ACRE Square Feet 5.4 Million M
ST
ICE
SE TER
HOU
ELL
AY CT SKYW
IA DR
YALE WAY
OSG
WAY
OOD
ON
CAM
262 DR GY
D
TE
OL
CH
NO
LO
RD
IS
ED
CENT
S
UT
BUSI
[8 DR E PK
CT
x1 million
WY
s]
S
PE
WAR
re
N
e
ac
O PA
SE
PA
50
m il
IO
CT
RING
M SP VD S BL
SE
RE
ST
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
JOBS: from 20,300 to 36,200 jobs
CH
AR
INGOT
x1 million
RELIANCE WAY OMEGA DR
WAY R LA
a 1/4
Warm Springs BART Station
LO
INDUSTRIAL DR
SPR
AV E
ING
680
CORPORATE WAY
M
WAR
Unio
S
NG
RI
SP
n Pa
I-680 OR
CT
cific
BOGGS
L PL
oad Railr
RIA
LVD
UST
IND
SB
AVE
N RD
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
BROW
WARM SPRINGS
TESLA Factory
OP
PORT LOOP
W
T LO OR
HP
RT
NO
CRAWFORD ST
ON PL FULT
NORTH
E
880
E
re
PESTAN
NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: from 10,900,000 sf to 14,410,000 sf
CT
PO
A
SO
A
NC
y
BL VD
ud
VD ER BL
IMM
S GR
FREMONT BLVD
SS
St
NESS
PL
DR
VD BL
OW
NG
AD
ER DR
RI
E AVE
PRUN TAVIS
A PL
RM WA
MI
ME
SP
RK
M
PA
WAR
PARCEL 3 52 ACRE
N CT
SIO
MIS
CUSHING PKWY
N N AVE O CM RRE E WA
SHA G
PK
Y
RD
MIS
TO KA
N AVE
ORE
RRE
WA
ERT
BAY
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
ST
R AVE
RIE
R ST
Y
FOU
AVE TNE FOR
E PKW
URN
AUB
MAR
CT
DIS
ST
SE TER
HOU
IA DR ELL
OSG OOD
WAY
DR GY CH
NO
LO
RD
TE
BUSI
WAY
ud
R
CT
PO
A
E
re
SO LA
A
NC
y
UT
a
CT
[8 DR O PA SE
PA
e
ac
m il
50
1/4
Warm Springs BART Station
s]
RING
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
x1 million
RELIANCE WAY
VD S BL
SE
RE
ST
CH AR
INGOT
x1 million
M SP
INDUSTRIAL DR
FREMONT BLVD
CT
x1 million
WY E PK
re
WAR
S
PE LO
(Could include Special Uses such as entertainment, community facilities, and hotels)
NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: from 10,490,000 sf to 13,930,000 sf
St
VD ER BL
IMM
S GR
A PL
PESTAN
OMEGA DR
CENT
PL
DR
VD BL
OW
S
PRUN TAVIS
AD
ER DR
E AVE
NG RI
NESS
ME
SP
RK
M
PA
WAR
[
CAM
AY CT SKYW
YALE WAY
ON
IS
ED
D
Commercial High Tech Office
x100
OL
(Could include Special Uses such as entertainment, community facilities, and hotels)
CLIPPER
x100
Innovation Campus/Residential TOD ICE
Commercial/Industrial - Office/Research & Development
LIPP
SID
1000’ 1500’ 2000’
x100
ST
D
W BLV
500’
x100
D ST
WAY
ICIA
VIE
0
Industrial - Technology/Research & Development
x100
NAL
LS CT
ULT
QUINA
BEN
LAKE
N AVE
RRE
W WA
[
x100 FER
N FAL
SIO
880
LN
KAM
HAC
MIS
Industrial - General Industrial/Manufacturing
RESIDENTIAL UNITS: approximately 2,350 units
ST
W
SIO N
IN
BLV D
ND
ASU HAV
NIK
LA
JOBS: from 19,800 to 35,300 jobs
E
AV
Commercial - Retail Center
WAR
Unio
680
CORPORATE WAY
M S
NG
RI
SP
n Pa
CT
Ra cific
AVE
d ilroa
L PL
RIA
UST
IND
I-680 OR
BOGGS
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
x1000
N RD
BROW
HP
RT OP
PORT LOOP
W
T LO OR
CRAWFORD ST
ON PL FULT
NORTH
E
(includes support services such as retail, schools, and parks)
TESLA Factory
NO
Residential - High Density
N CT
SIO
MIS
CUSHING PKWY
N N AVE O CM RRE E WA
SHA Y
RD
MIS
TO KA
N AVE
WA
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
x100
D ST
LS CT
ST
ERT
BAY
LIPP
Y
E PKW
URN
AUB
ST
R AVE
RIE
FOU
AVE R ST TNE FOR
SID
1000’ 1500’ 2000’
x100
NAL
N FAL
WAY
D
W BLV
500’
x100
FER
SIO MIS
ULT
QUINA
ICIA
VIE
0
CLIPPER
x100
KAM
HAC
BEN
LAKE
N AVE
RRE
W WA
[
x100 LN ORE
RRE
880
Retail Frontage
RESIDENTIAL UNITS: approximately 3,270 units
ST
W
BLV
PK
N
G
SIO
IN
D
ND
ASU HAV
NIK
LA
Open Space
CT
DIS
MAR
Innovation District/Residential Mixed-Use ST
PLANNING
7
GATEWAY PARK CONCEPT PLAN Oakland, CA | 2011 Client Bay Area Transit Authority Bay Conservation and Development Commission
City of Oakland East Bay Municipal Utilities District East Bay Regional Parks District
California Transportation Commission
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
Caltrans
Port of Oakland
Size 50 acres
Firm Perkins+Will
Role Planner, Public Outreach Coordinator
The Bay Bridge East Span across San Francisco Bay from Treasure Island to Oakland welcomes bicyclists and pedestrians on the bridge for the first time. Working in collaboration with PWP Landscape Architects, the Project Concept Report is the initial public outreach and concept design for Gateway Park. I participated as part of the urban design and community outreach team, partnering with the community to plan a Gateway Park that benefits the health, economic vitality and quality of life of everyone in the region. The planning process was used to bring this forgotten piece of waterfront at the foot of the bridge to the attention of local Oakland residents, Bay Trail and Water Trail users, bicyclists and boaters, truckers and shipping businesses.
8
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Population Density: People Per Square Mile
Land Use
Touchdown Plaza / Bridge Access
Radio Beach
• Bike/Pedestrian Bridge Access • Bridge Orientation • Bike Amenities
• Bayside Trail
Radio Beach
trian
edes
Bike/p
Park Entry Road - Alt .1
Window
Caltrans
on
Transportati Museum
EBMUD Main Wastewater Treatment Plant
EBM
ce Yard Pa
rk
en
En try
Ro a
urm
Pro
pert
y
North Development Parcel
a-A lt. 2
et St re 7t h
ar
Bik
e/P
ed
es
The Maze / West Oakland
tria
nC
ros
• Active recreation • Garden and wetlands • Dog Park
sin
g
str
ian
pa
th
-A
lon
g
M ar
Bo
Ele vate We db st ike Oa /pe kla de nd - W strian .G ran path to d
East Development Parcel
itim e
to
Berth 21
alk
End
dB
West Development Parcel
dw
West
Wake Ave.
Central Development Parcel Baywalk
UD
Maintenan
The Gre
The Point
eryville
to Em
Mandela Parkway
Highway
path
de
We s
bik
e/
pe
tG
ran
dA ve
e
Ele
va
te
d
nu
The Point and Baywalk
• Native Planting • Bayside Trails and Overlooks • Shoreline Conveyance Ride • Marina and Kayak Launch
Boardwalk
• Shops and Eateries • Ferry Stop • Viewing Ride
The Green
• Heart of the Park • Transportation Museum • Bridge Artifacts • Passive and Active Recreation • Large event venue • Children’s Play Area
Entrance / Park Entry Road
• Elevated bike/pedestrian paths along Maritime and W. Grand to and from West Oakland • Bike/Pedestrian paths to and from Emeryville • Park Entry Road from Maritime Avenue Train Station
Image: PWP Landscape Architecture
Illustrations by Christopher Grubbs
PLANNING
9
NORTHEAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY STRATEGIC PLAN Los Angeles, CA | 2011 Client Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles (CRA/LA)
Size 4,000 acres
Firm Perkins+Will
Role Planner, Urban Designer, Graphics
Focusing on the communities of Pacoima and Panorama City, this strategic plan and vision for San Fernando Valley was developed based on an understanding of current and future development trend, changing demographics, and emerging
Heavy Industrial 0.85%
new markets. The planning process included analysis and design of 10 catalytic projects, ranging from industrial revitalization and public infrastructure and transportation and parking improvements
Medium-Density Residential 20.84%
Light Industrial 26.45%
to create better downtown corridors. Low-Density Residential 15.44%
Regional Commerce 1.83%
Land Use
10
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Open Space and Quasi-Public Space 22.75%
Neighborhood Commerce 11.84%
P P
SAN FERNANDO
EL DORADO
TELFAIR
KEWEN
HADDON
Park
ILEX
Park
Park
LAUREL CANYON
AMBOY
TAMARACK
P P CAYUGA
P ONEIDA
P O MELVENY
P P RINCON
Potential Site for New Buildings/Social Plaza
Potential Consolidated Parking
Potential Site for New Buildings/Social Plaza
Potential Consolidated Parking
P
P P
P P
P Park and Park(ing) Van Nuys
Parking Strategy for Main Street Van Nuys Boulevard
Land Development Study for Panorama Mall Area
11 PLANNING
SAN DIEGO DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES San Diego, CA | 2010 Client Centre City Development Corporation
Firm Perkins+Will
Role Planner, Graphics, Report Layout
Based on the 2006 Downtown Community Plan, the Downtown Design Guidelines focuses on enhancing the civic life and livability of downtown San Diego. The plan addresses the downtown’s built environment – both the public and private realms. Guidelines for streets, sidewalks, plazas, and parks, as well as building massing, scale, and character, reinforce this downtown-wide framework and improve the overall pedestrian environment. The guidelines are based on a careful analysis of existing conditions, plans, and precedents; work sessions with downtown developers, property owners, business, and public agencies; and community workshops with downtown residents. I helped write and create graphics to illustrate the proposed downtown-wide urban design framework in addition to guidelines for streets, sidewalks, plazas, and parks, as well as the building massing, scale, and character for downtown San Diego.
12
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION Overview 1.1 Scope and Organization 1.2 Consistency with Other Plans 1.3 How to Use This Document
2. URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK Overview 2.1 Goals for Downtown 2.2 Urban Design Framework
9 11 14 15 15
17 19 21 27
3. STREET CORRIDORS
33
Overview 3.1 Street Corridors 3.2 Streets in General 3.3 Street Landscape 3.4 Boulevards 3.5 Principal Couplets 3.6 Special Streets 3.7 Green Streets 3.8 Main Streets 3.9 Residential Streets 3.10 Multifunction Streets
35 36 38 45 56 64 67 71 76 80 85
4. BLOCKS AND BUILDINGS Overview 4.1 Key Principles 4.2 Structure of the Guidelines 4.3 Block Edges and Building Placement 4.4 Block Modulation and Building Massing 4.5 Building Design 4.6 Extending the Public Realm 4.7 Sustainability
89 91 92 93 94 96 103 116 120
MAIN STREET Concept 2 STREET Concept 2 MAIN
MAIN STREET Concept 1 STREET Concept 1 MAIN
2.5'
6' 5.5'
8'
Thru- Furnishway ing Zone/ Edge Zone Zone
Parking
11 '
11'
18' Parking
Urban Design Framework 14'
Sidewalk
48'
Curb-to-Curb
5.5' 7.5' 5'
2.5'
Furnish- Thruway ing Zone/ Zone Edge Zone
18'
6' 5.5'
8'
Thru- Furnishway ing Zone/ Edge Zone Zone
Parking
11 '
14'
Sidewalk
Sidewalk
80'
Neighborhood Main Streets & Open Space Network
11'
18' Parking
48'
Curb-to-Curb
2.5'
5.5' 7.5' 5' Furnish- Thruway ing Zone/ Zone Edge Zone
6' 5.5'
8'
Thru- Furnishway ing Zone/ Edge Zone Zone
Parking
14'
18'
Sidewalk
Sidewalk
13 '
13'
18' Parking
52'
Curb-to-Curb
5.5' 6'
2.5'
Furnish- Thruway ing Zone/ Zone Edge Zone
14'
Sidewalk
80'
80'
Main Street - Option 1
2.5'
6' 5.5'
8'
Thru- Furnishway ing Zone/ Edge Zone Zone
Parking
14'
Sidewalk
13 '
13'
18' Parking
52'
Curb-to-Curb
5.5' 6'
2.5'
Furnish- Thruway ing Zone/ Zone Edge Zone
14'
Sidewalk
80'
Main Street - Option 2
Street Character
Building Edge
Street or Street Typology
Focus
Traffic
Traffic Lanes
Trees
Street Wall
Setback (DDG)
Boulevard
Gateway, Civic, Iconic
High
4 to 6
Consistent Tree Palette
Hold Street Wall; Plazas OK
0 - 65 feet on Broadway; 0 feet on all others
Principal Couplet
Gateway, Vehicular
High
3
Consistent Tree Palette
Hold Street Wall
0 - 5 feet
India Street
Active, Retail
Slow
2
Consistent Tree Palette
Hold Street Wall
0 feet
C Street
Transit
Slow
0 to 1
Consistent Tree Palette
Hold Street Wall
0 feet
Special Street (Hawthorne Street to Beech Street)
Street Typologies
(India Street to Park Boulevard)
PLANNING
13
BROOKLYN PIERS 7-12 Brooklyn, NY | 2008 Client New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC)
Size 146 acres
Firm SMWM
Role Planner, Urban Designer
This 120-acre waterfront was part of a planning study to understand the feasibility of accommodating a range of new uses including cruise terminals, a marina, hotel, public markets, light industry, and open space. The area contained warehouses, cobbled streets, piers, large upland sites, and expansive views defines the edge, while the sense of a working waterfront is strong and remains an essential flavor of the area. The neighborhood has become a destination for artists, artisans and creative companies drawn by open views, lower rents, large spaces, and the lure of the waterfront. Regional retail and the cruise terminals contribute to the area’s future economic regeneration. I served as planner and urban designer, working in collaboration with economists and City staff to develop a politically viable, economically-sound, and enjoyable place to be.
14
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
FULTON NASSAU CORRIDOR STUDY Manhattan, NY | 2007 Client New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC)
Size 17 acres
Firm SMWM
Role Planner, Analyst
One of New York City’s most important river-to-river corridors and oldest retail district, the Fulton-Nassau corridor was dramatically affected by redevelopment of the former World Trade Center site at one end, the anticipated expansion of the
Design Guidelines
Storefront Design Options
South Street Seaport at the other end, and the growth of Lower Manhattan’s residential population. Working for the New York EDC, the design guidelines and action items involved collaboration among a large group of regulatory agencies. Retail market analysis combined with historic building research and documentation lead to development of building façade and storefront guidelines that will preserve the corridor’s history while stimulating economic growth. To create a pedestrian-friendly street that is also inviting for shoppers, workers, and residents in the area, I researched and documented building facades and storefronts along this important street, and interfaced with historic preservationists and market retail analysts to produce a final report that included two parts, design guidelines and action items. PLANNING
15
ST. ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS LAND USE FEASIBILITY STUDY Washington, DC | 2005 Client GSA/Jones Lang LaSalle
Size 176 acres
Firm SmithGroup
Role Planner, Analyst
The St. Elizabeths West Campus Site consists of 176 acres of hilly terrain in the Anacostia area of Southeast Washington DC. The land use feasibility analysis assesses the current site in order to evaluate suitable areas for future office development and a campus for secure government facilities. I served as planner and urban designer to analyze the site and propose potential built forms. Important factors included preserving historic landmark buildings and viewsheds, as well as soils, topography, slopes, and vegetation.
16
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Context within the District
Vegetation
Viewshed Martin Luther King Ave
78
Red
View
woo
25
Nav y Ya
up
8
rd
r
le from E Bldg
33
28 29 30
k facade from
View of Hitchcoc
38
Spruce
40
ar
Ced Dr
1
46
Capitol
of W ashi ng
123
dria
Trail Carriage ia, from
l
ld Garfie from Wing ria, West xand from of Ale ria, xand of Ale
Alexandr
Trai
View
View of
ge
View
ria
Car
118
m
16
y St
Holl
118A
, fro
15
Ash St
rget Geo and ton
130
11
View
Topography
55
63 53
Cedar Dr
12
View
Airport
Ln
exan
ional
m
v er Ri
Phasing Zones
ma
o Pot
5
60
of Al
gan Nat
ee tgu
St
of Rea
5
17
Sw
St
57
lly
tia os Anac
low
Wil
56
Ho
6
66
62
52
45
View
7
Plum St
49 44
69
68
41
St
3
ow n
View of U.S.
2
E Bldg
67
64
Dr
Redw
lock
Hem
Dr
St
39
34
4
tree
en Rain
71
72
73 Redwood Dr
37
ood
Gold
74
View of Quadrang
31
6
Rive
75
St
36
27
Bldg
of
18
23 26 32
nter
w Vie
View
70
76
Pine
24
d Dr
of Ce
8
Persimmon St
77
21 20
cR
Martin Luther King Ave
78
iver
woo d Dr
25
23
31
33
28 29 30
38
Spruc e St
40
4 dar Dr
tree
Dr
en Rain
1
Gold
46
49 44
ee tgu
low
Ln
St Ash St
11
5B
ly St
118
CEMETERY
5C
123
130
12
15
60 57
55
63 53
Cedar Dr
16
St
56
5 lly
m
4B B
Wil
45
3 17
Sw
2B
66
62
52
Ho
1
2
St
2A
1B
Plum St
41
Ce
4
lock
Hem
1A
69
67
64
d Dr
71
68
39
34 woo
3
72
73 Redwood Dr
Red
2
74
37
36
27
6
75
St
26 32
8
70
76
Pine
24
Red
18
Persimmon St
77
21 20
118A
Hol
4A
CEMETE CEMETERY CE EMET TERY
5A
Cross-Section through the Main building
PLANNING
17
SUITABILITY ANALYSIS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN ITHACA Ithaca, NY | 2004 Client Professor Ann-Margaret Esnard, Cornell University
Role GIS Student Project
In the 2000, nearly 50 percent of all single mothers with children under six years of age had incomes below the poverty level in Tompkins County, NY. To alleviate the housing shortage, as well as help single parents reach financial independence, I chose to study suitable affordable housing locations as part of my final GIS student project. The goal of the project was to find locations suitable for the development of a new 200,000 sf affordable housing community for households with children. Using GIS and spatial analysis, several factors were analyzed and weighted in order to locate the most optimal locations for development. They included distance to daycare facilities, schools, major employers, bus stops, and welfare distribution centers, as well as existing land use, and environmental factors such as topography, slopes, floodplains and wetlands.
18
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Near Daycare Facilities
Near Schools
Near TCAT Bus stop
Calculate Distance
Distance to Daycare
Distance to Daycare
Distance to Schools
Distance to Schools
Distance to TCAT Bus stop
Near TCAT Bus stop
Spatial AnalysisÆ Reclassfiy
DistanceÆ
Suitable Location for Affordable Housing
Near Welfare Distribution Centers
Straight Line
Distance to Welfare Centers
Weight Distance to Welfare Centers
•25% •20% •30% •7.5% •7.5%
Near major Ithaca employers
On relatively flat land
Calculate Slope
Not on wetlands, existing parks
Not on wetlands, existing parks
Distance to major Ithaca employers
Distance to major Ithaca employers
Slope steepness
Reclassified Slope
•10% 100%
Final Suitability Map
PLANNING
19
TRANSPORTATION Many of my projects span both sides of the right-of-way. My experience with transportation projects range from multi-use paths to complete streets, focusing not only on traffic and congestion, but also on designing effective streetscapes and parking strategies to help pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers safely navigate within a given setting.
QUECHEE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SCOPING STUDY Quechee Village, Hartford, VT | 2014 Client Town of Hartford
Size 4.6 miles
Firm RSG
Role Project Manager, Planner, Public Outreach Coordinator
Situated along the scenic Ottauquechee River, Quechee Village is an attractive rural community that brings together housing, office, retail, and recreational uses all within a serene Vermont setting. These qualities put Quechee Village and the surrounding area in a unique position to be an attractive place for walking and cycling. I served as the project manager as well as primary planner in creating a long-term plan for a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network throughout the heart of Quechee Village in the Town of Hartford. I was deeply involved in gathering existing conditions research and in conducting public meetings both in person and online. In working with Alta Planning and Design, I also helped develop alternative planning concepts for public feedback and wrote and organized the final scoping report.
22
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Crash Circumstances (2008-2012)
Existing Trails
Number of Crashes (2008-2012)
Public Meeting Feedback Wordle
TRANSPORTATION
23
WEST BRATTLEBORO BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SCOPING STUDY Brattleboro, VT | 2014 Client Town of Brattleboro
Size 0.56 miles
Firm RSG
Role Transportation Planner
The Town of Brattleboro, VT received funding through the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety as well as roadway and streetscape enhancements in the heart of West Brattleboro. I served as the project planner on the West Brattleboro Bicycle and Pedestrian Scoping Study, with the goal of developing a cohesive network of bicycle and pedestrian facilities on Western Avenue. I conducted an existing conditions analysis on the mixed-use neighborhood and worked with a landscape architect and traffic engineer to develop alternative strategies to create an enhanced streetscape for this mixed-use village corridor. The preferred alternative consisted of continuous protected bike lanes, widened sidewalks, and curbed median landscaping, in order to create a unified set of recommendations for future improvements that will make it more comfortable for a range of users, including students, residents, visitors, and customers to walk and bike on Western Avenue.
24
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
TRANSPORTATION
25
DOWNTOWN DOVER STREETSCAPE AND PEDESTRIAN STUDY Dover, NH | 2014 Location Dover, NH
Client City of Dover
Firm RSG
Role Transportation Planner
To assist the City of Dover in rebalancing the circulation within its downtown and making it a safe and comfortable experience for all modes, I served as the project planner and worked in collaboration with traffic engineers and landscape architects to redesign the streetscape and urban blocks in order to enhance downtown Dover. Our interdisciplinary team developed three alternative plans that not only improved traffic operations but also fostered a more enjoyable pedestrian environment by reducing crossing distances and creating larger plaza spaces. As part of this project, I developed street sections, site plans, and circulation studies, as well as presented findings in front of the City’s technical advisory committee.
26
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Origin-Destination Flow (PM)
Existing Chestnut Street Section
Proposed Chestnut Street Section
TRANSPORTATION
27
BEDFORD PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Bedford, NH | 2013 Location Bedford, NH
Client Town of Bedford
Firm RSG
Role Project Manager, Planner
In recognizing the growing demand for walkable residential streets and safer bicycling routes, I worked in concert with the Town of Bedford, its community residents, and stakeholders, to identify destinations and important connections that would improve the pedestrian and cyclist experience. In addition to an extensive public outreach process, the project also took into consideration traffic speed and volumes, land use, drainage, maintenance, and safety in arriving at a final bicycle and pedestrian master plan. This pedestrian and bicycle master plan was awarded Northern New England APA’s Plan of the Year in 2013.
28
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Stakeholder Feedback
Proposed Chestnut Street Section
Proposed Chestnut Street Section
Bike Lane + Sidewalk Street Sections
Shared Lane + Widened Shoulder
TRANSPORTATION
29
MONTPELIER IN MOTION BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN Montpelier, VT | 2014 Location Montpelier, VT
Client City of Montpelier
Firm RSG
Role Planner
The City of Montpelier is the capitol of Vermont and is home to an active community of cyclists, pedestrians, and runners. I served as the primary transportation planner, in coordination with Broadreach Planning, in the development of a safe and seamless bicycle and pedestrian network for the City of Montpelier. The project included stakeholder working sessions and GIS analysis in order to arrive at a preferred system that would serve users of all abilities.
30
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Road Pavement Conditions
Existing Pedestrian Counts
LEBANON PARKING PLANNING STUDY Lebanon, NH | 2014 Client City of Lebanon
Firm RSG
Role Project Manager, Transportation Planner
To serve the needs of the City of Lebanon in re-assessing its parking demands, I managed the parking inventory for nine neighborhoods in the City and detailed utilization counts for two neighborhoods: Downtown and West Lebanon. The project was two-fold: I lead the GIS effort in estimating all surface and on-street parking spaces for the entire city. From the parking counts, a utilization study was conducted for Downtown and West Lebanon to assess parking demands during AM, Midday, and PM Peak periods. Ultimately, the plan resulted in a proposed circulation study that would consolidate parking and update the parking requirements in the city’s zoning code.
TRANSPORTATION
31
COLCHESTER-ESSEX NETWORK TRANSPORTATION STUDY Colchester and Essex | 2013 Client Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC)
Firm RSG
Role Planner, Public Outreach Coordinator
I worked with CCRPC and the public works directors for the Towns of Essex and Colchester to analyze and propose solutions to address the transportation effects in Colchester and Essex. In addition to modeling the current and future traffic conditions, I also analyzed existing plans in the context of future land use and the environmental context. I was actively involved in the community outreach efforts, which were an important component this study. Several public meetings were held for each of the three study areas in order to gather feedback from stakeholders and residents throughout the planning process.
32
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
TRANSPORTATION
33
MARKET STREET EXTENSION GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN Portsmouth, NH | 2013 Client City of Portsmouth
Size 0.8 miles
Firm RSG
Role Planner, Public Outreach Coordinator
With an eye on transforming the Market Street corridor from an undervalued and uninspired parkway into a welcoming Gateway and intermodal experience, I served as the project planner on a team of landscape architects and engineers to design a safe and exciting experience into Portsmouth. The project work includes weaving in measures to create character and identity to place through added traffic calming, bike lanes, and a multi-use path. In addition, I helped spearhead the use of online web tools to garner greater public input and participation in the concept design of the corridor.
34
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
TRANSPORTATION
35
KILLINGTON STREETSCAPE, BICYCLE, AND PEDESTRIAN SCOPING STUDY Killington, VT | 2012 Location Killington, VT
Client
VT 100 Triangle
Town of Killington
Size 0.7 miles
Rou te
Firm
4 Ea
st
RSG
Role Planner, Analyst t es W 4 e ut
The Town of Killington, in recognizing the need to improve bicycle and pedestrian
Ro
accessibility, roadway safety, and improve the overall streetscape environment to create a principle gateway to the Town, worked with RSG and Landworks to develop a scoping study to identify a path R
team in organizing and preparing materi-
IV ER
forward. I played an integral role on the
R
D
als for an interactive public meeting to
learn the goals, experiences, and desires of local residents and business owners.
well as enhance the arrival experience in
ND
improve pedestrian and bicycle safety, as
THU
KENT POND
ERI
NG
100
K RD
I also participated in identifying ways to
B RO O
Killington at the crossroads of US 4 and
ST
VT 100.
UD
100
EA Y AR
4
KIL
GT
ON RD
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
WH
LIN
36
I LL
RD
ements
Simulation of Potential Streetscape Enhancements View looking east toward commercial area west of Route 100 intersection
Approach from the West on Route 4
Existing Conditions
View looking east toward commercial area west of Route 100 intersection
Simulation of Potential Streetscape Enhancements
Simulation of Potential Streetscape Enhancements
View looking west toward western end of commercial area
Simulation
View looking west toward intersection of Route 4 and Route 100
Looking West from Route 4 West
Existing Conditions
Approaching Triangle from VT100 N
View looking ea
Approach from the East on Route 4
Existing Conditions
View looking west toward western end of commercial area
Existing Co
View looking west toward intersection of Route 4 and Route 100
View looking ea
Note: Simulations are approximate, based on conceptual plans.
etscape Scoping Study
Killington Streetscape Scoping Study
cape/Road Enhancements Simulations
Streetscape/Road Enhanceme May 2012
ements
Renderings by LandWorks
Simulation of Potential Streetscape Enhancements
Simulation of Potential Streetscape Enhancements
Simulation of Potential Streetscape Enhancements
Simulation
Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
Existing Co
View looking east toward commercial area west of Route 100 intersection
View looking west toward western end of commercial area
View looking west toward intersection of Route 4 and Route 100
View looking ea
R I VE R RD View looking east toward commercial area west of Route 100 intersection
View looking west toward intersection of Route 4 and Route 100
View looking west toward western end of commercial area
View looking ea
Note: Simulations are approximate, based on conceptual plans.
100 cape/Road Enhancements Simulations
etscape Scoping Study
4
Killington Streetscape Scoping Study
Streetscape/Road Enhanceme May 2012
TRANSPORTATION
37
DARTMOUTH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN – CIRCULATION ANALYSIS Hanover, NH | 2012 Client Dartmouth College
Firm RSG
Role Transportation Planner
In support of the Dartmouth Campus Master Plan, and in collaboration with BFJ Planning, I investigated the traffic implications of several future parking scenarios in downtown Hanover. These parking scenarios were developed as part of a broader campus master planning effort in an attempt to reallocate space for future growth and to shift parking out of the central campus area to alleviate overall traffic congestion.
38
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Regional Employees by Zip Code
Parking Occupancy
Average Annual Daily Traffic
Parking Assumptions
Base Scenario Circulation
Parking by Origin Circulation
TRANSPORTATION
39
REGIONAL OF PEEL STRATEGIC GOODS NETWORK STUDY Region of Peel, Ontario, Canada | 2013 Client Region of Peel
Firm RSG
Role Planner, Freight Analyst
The Region of Peel is a large, fast-growing region in Ontario and sought to develop a strategic plan for designating and implementing a network of primary goods movement roads and intermodal connectors. The focus was on enhancing current freight mobility while maintaining economic growth and resident quality of life. I worked intensively with elected officials, community stakeholders and the private freight community to set a base for which future freight network and good movement-related land-uses and policies may built upon.
40
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Truck Restrictions
Truck Through-Trips
Overview of SGMN Implementation Tasks / Tactics Strategy 1
Implementation Tasks/Tactics
Strengthen the Official Plan to further support goods movement
2
Prioritize Operational, Management, and Capital Improvements that Support SGMN
A.
Regional Council adopt SGMN Plan
B.
Implement components relating to regional roads and circulate to area municipalities for appropriate action
A.
Use existing data to assess gaps between the SGMN strategy and existing conditions to identify improvement needs
B.
Conduct truck operation-focused reviews/inspections of all Primary and Connector SGMN routes
C.
Prioritize needed improvements based on traffic volumes and significance of origins/destinations served
A.
Implement operational and management improvements on prioritized SGMN routes – examples:
3 Execute SGMN – Supportive Improvements
4
B.
Assess SGMN Impacts and Make Improvements as Needed
•
Signage improvements and expansion
•
Traffic signal timing and optimization
•
ITS to provide in-cab advisories to truckers (work with OTA & truck companies)
Add prioritized SGMN capital projects to Regional and Municipal Capital Programs – examples: •
Intersection geometry and capacity improvements
•
Lane/cross-section expansions
•
Roadway reconstruction/bridge replacement & upgrade
•
ITS/Signalization installations and expansions
•
Use MTO’s Freight Supportive Guidelines to help design and implement infrastructure improvements in SGMN Routes
C.
Build capital projects in support of SGMN based on priority
A.
Establish and expand goods movement efficiency, safety, etc. data collection program within Peel and monitor/report SGMN performance and impacts on community
B.
Update SGMN Plan based on needs identified through performance monitoring
Concept Maps from August 2012 Working Session Peel Strategic Goods Movement Study
Peel Strategic Goods Movement Network Study
Peel Strategic Goods Movement Study
Table 2
Table 1 Table #1
Three Key Themes
• Origin & destination • Connectivity • Land use • Transit/LRT
• Identification of existing/potential freight significant areas (FSAS) • Land use conflicts • Need for finer road grid
Three Issues or problems
• Residential/scenic/environmental sensitive exposure • Transit – plan to reduce friction • S/o QEW – lack of defined corridors
Three Issues or problems
• Lack of clarity on exercise and users • Conflicts between land uses and users and goods movement • Evolving land use
Top Few Criteria used to develop network concept
Top Few Criteria used to develop network concept
• Destination needs (intermodal/ airport) • Define Ring Rd to alleviate travel movement from certain corridors • Connection to/from highways
Draft Working Session 1 Results
• Location of significant freight areas • highways • areas where conflicts exist (i.e, Malton)
17
18
Draft Outreach Results & Analysis September 2012
Peel Strategic Goods Movement Network Study
Peel Strategic Goods Movement Study
Table 7
Table 4
Table 3 Table #2
Three Key Messages
Table #4
Table #3
Three Key Themes
Three Key Themes
• connectivity • alternatives • existing land use
• examined potential restrictions – where possible to humanize • Goods movement improvements needing to be considered on roadways that service intermodal sites • Integrated approach and balance on arterial roadways that service major transit corridors
Three Issues or problems
• restrictions • enforcement • competing interests
Top Few Criteria used to develop network concept
Three Issues or problems
• better links to Highways • connections to major goods generators and receivers
• Not aware of truck restrictions and why • Lack of future land use map • Applicability/implications of all ideas • Adequately service transit and goods movement
Three Issues or problems
• lack of sufficient interchanges and connections for the airport • avoiding existing residential/ settlement areas • not knowing exact details of GTA west and N/S Highway • started at the “freight hubs” and worked out from there • connections
Connectivity Integrated approach LCV expansion and accommodation Filling in gaps Improvements around intermodal sites Alternative routes
Draft Working Session 1 Results
• adjacent current and future land use • ensuring N/S and E/W routes • connections to existing and known future transportation nodes/highways
Top Few Criteria used to develop network concept
Top Few Criteria used to develop network concept
• • • • • •
Table #7
Three Key Themes
19
20
Draft Outreach Results & Analysis September 2012
Draft Working Session 1 Results
TRANSPORTATION
23
41
ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK: MULTI-USE TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Rocky Mountain National Park, CO | 2014 Client National Park Service
Firm RSG
Role Transportation Planner
The purpose of the multi-use trail analysis was to expand multimodal options for visitors and reduce traffic congestion in areas adjacent to designated wilderness land. I assisted in evaluating the potential for developing a multiuse trail system that would connect to recreational areas and other local trail systems in Estes Valley within Rocky Mountain National Park. The analysis took into account resource concerns, topographic challenges, and distance. As part of this effort, I also developed a series of clear maps and newsletters to communicate the proposed alternative routes to the public.
42
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
CHRISTIAN STREET BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SCOPING STUDY Quechee Village, Hartford, VT | 2012 Client Town of Hartford
Size 2 miles
Firm RSG
Role Transportation Planner, Public Outreach Coordinator
The Town of Hartford, in conjunction with parents and staff of the Dothan Brook School and the Hartford community, has long recognized the need to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety in the vicinity of the Dothan Brook School. The Christian Street/Bugbee Street/US 5 Scoping Study is the culmination of a nine month planning process to solicit input and develop a conceptual plan and implementation strategy for creating a safe alternative route for all people, and especially students, to travel to the Dothan Brook School. As part of this effort, I prepared and coordinated a lively discussion with local residents and friends of the Dothan Brook School to identify ways to improve the safety and experience for people, particularly students, who travel to and from the elementary school.
TRANSPORTATION
43
URBAN DESIGN The physical character shapes the experience of a place, in the form of landscapes, infrastructure, land uses, and building interfaces. An urban designer by training, I enjoy working and designing at the crossroads between the natural landscape, site infrastructure, and built form. My past projects range from localized site plans to campus plans and large-scale development plans, many of which are located on brownfield sites or adjacent to existing communities.
LOUDON NW CONCEPT PLANS Roanoke, VA | 2013 Client City of Roanoke
Size 72 acres
Firm RSG
Role Project Manager, Planner, Urban Designer
Building on the City of Roanoke’s Rail Corridor Revitalization Plan, I worked with the City and a team of economists and market researchers to create four sustainable and economically feasible alternative concept site plans for the redevelopment of the Loudon NW target area. The design concepts emphasized the transition experience between residential and industrial uses in a topographically challenging 72-acre site just north of the Roanoke rail yards. The planning process included site analysis, renderings, and elevations showing how the future envisioned urban flex area could evolve and be transformed.
46
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Proposed Land Use and Square Footage Development
Concept Sketches
4
LOUDON
22ND
3
14TH
15TH
16TH
17TH
18TH
19TH
CENTRE
20TH
24TH
Concept B Section Elevation
SHENANDOAH
3
BEFORE
AFTER
4
BEFORE
AFTER
URBAN DESIGN
47
SOUTHFIELD MASTER PLAN South Weymouth, MA | 2007 Client LNR Corporation South Shore Tri-Town Development Corporation
Size 1,450 acres
Firm SMWM
Role Urban Designer
The landmark once known as the South Weymouth Naval Air Station was transformed into the South Shore’s exciting new live,work,play, and shop community. Following a series of Smart Growth and Sustainable Development workshops, the overall master plan for Southfield creates for a walkable and transit-oriented community with residential, biopharmaceutical production and research facilities, Main Street retail, a range of parks and community facilities, and a multi-modal center on the existing MBTA transit line. This project is currently under construction and participated in an LEED-ND Pilot Program. I served as an urban designer on this project for over a year, developing site plans, renderings, and other graphics to facilitate the master plan and LEED application process.
48
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
LEED ND Application Figures
Street Grid Density
Smart Location
0
SouthField
Downtown Boston with Project Overlay 04 May 2007
Client
Project Team
LNR Property Corporation
SMWM William E. Ryan BlueWave Strategies Brown Rudnick Street-Works The Dartmouth Company Cushman & Wakefield
325 650
Tishman Construction Tricia Bruno & Associates O’Neill and Associates burke + design Liquid Advertising Kleiman Associates Epsilon Associates
1300
2600
Kimley-Horn and Assoc. Inc. CH2M Hill GEVA Geotech GZA GeoEnvironmental Halvorson Design Rizzo Associates Faxon & Booth Golf Design
URBAN DESIGN
49
KAMENSKOE PLATO MASTER PLAN Almaty, Kazakhstan | 2007 Client DCM / Edmond Shipway
Size 60 acres
Firm SMWM
Role Urban Designer
I served as an urban designer on this project, conducting the initial site visit and collaborating with architects and landscape architects to develop this site master plan for a sustainable 60-acre mixed-use residential community, located on a challenging hilltop site 15 minutes from downtown Almaty. The plan integrates the natural landscape and existing features, incorporates sustainable site infrastructure, and sites buildings following the steep contours of the landscape. A dense program of 1,400 housing units on the dramatic site includes designs for townhouses, apartments, and duplexes that take advantage of solar orientation, wind patterns for natural ventilation, and stunning views. The plan channels stormwater and rainwater into an integrated landscape system and filters the water before returning it to the rivers or for reuse within the community. Development is planned in naturally formed clusters, taking cues from the landscape with gateways framed by existing apple orchards.
50
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Hilltown
Garden City
Riverwash
Views : Maximize South-facing views
Slopes: Build on suitable slopes
Watershed : Allow for natural run-off
Circulation : Three major access points
Shadow Studies
March 22, 10am
September 22, 2pm
September 22, 11am URBAN DESIGN
51
GREENVILLE MASTER PLAN Astana, Kazakhstan | 2007 Client BI Group
Size 520 hectares
Firm SMWM
Role Planner, Urban Designer
I served as an urban designer on this 520-hectare site in Kazakhstan’s capital city, located prominently between Astana’s major road, Kabanbai Batyr Avenue, and a canal leading to the Ishim River. The Master Plan includes a diverse mix: 16-story apartment towers, 1000-squaremeter cottage villas, a 50,000+ square meter shopping center, 8 schools, and 16 kindergartens. A greenway unifies this diverse mix, acting as a connective loop that weaves the site together. The greenway’s character changes as it maneuvers through the site, at times functioning as a linear park and at times widening to become a destination park or neighborhood open space. All the schools and other community facilities are sited as extensions of the greenway system and every neighborhood has a walkable connection to the main loop. Ground floor retail faces the primary streets, with residential units above, and parking both underground and in garages.
52
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
City Context
Illustrative
Batyr Avenue
Circulation
37th Str eet
27th Str eet
35th Str eet
Kabanb ai
Land Use
29th Str eet
Major Traffic Arterials Secondary Streets
URBAN DESIGN
53
ARDMORE GREEN TOWN CENTER SITE PLAN Ardmore, PA | 2007 Client EBL&S Development
Size 1.5 million square feet
Firm SMWM
Role Planner, Urban Designer
Ardmore, an economically struggling community, lies to the south of Suburban Square, a high-end and very successful life-style retail destination, one of the first of its kind in the country. The Town of Ardmore is separated from this landmark retail development and its neighboring wealthy residential communities to the north by poor connections across the historic Philadelphia region rail Main Line. I served as planner and urban designer on this study, working collaboratively the EBL&S Development-led team to create a vibrant and active mixed-use center that knits the north and south communities across the rail tracks. The design features a new train station, a community theater and park, streetscape improvements, 600 residential units, 44,000 gsf of retail, a 120-room boutique hotel and a 130-unit condo hotel. The proposal features a historically contextual design and emphasizes a wide range of sustainable design elements.
54
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
Site Plan with Parking - Walking Distance Overlay
Land Use - Upper Levels
Open Spaces
URBAN DESIGN
55
DONGGUK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Seoul, Korea | 2005 Client Professor Jonathan Barnett, UPenn and Dongguk University
Role Urban Design Student
To celebrate the 100-year anniversary of Dongguk University, campus officials requested the design of a new master plan to offer solutions for adding additional academic and residential facilities. This collaborative urban design studio involved students from University of Pennsylvania’s architecture, landscape architecture, and planning departments. The master plan optimizes underutilized spaces and uses creative building strategies to negotiate differences in topography. The plan also improves circulation throughout the campus and widens access from the campus to surrounding neighborhoods.
56
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
URBAN DESIGN
57
PUBLIC OUTREACH Community outreach and public engagement is a critical piece to the success of all planning projects. Often times, the greatest challenge and joy of a planning project is helping people move towards a shared understanding of the issues and empowering them to have a stake in the project. To this end, I have been involved in organizing and conducting numerous public workshops, stakeholder design charrettes, and gathered input both online and at community events.
MENLO PARK SPECIFIC PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP
A 60
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
NORTHEAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS
GATEWAY PARK PUBLIC WORKSHOPS
QUECHEE VILLAGE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PUBLIC MEETINGS
A
Organized materials and facilitated an engaging and well-attended public meeting in Menlo Park to inform community members of the economic and development potential within the downtown corridor and engage in discussion of three alternative development strategies for the proposed Downtown Specific Plan.
B
Organized and analyzed the transportation and public life survey data from San Francisco’s DOT, DPW, Department of City Planning, MTA, and CTA to conduct two public workshops and additional online webinars and surveys to inform the public about the importance of Market Street as a central city corridor and gather public commentary on areas and programs where the corridor needs improvement.
BART Station
13%
4%
Community - 24/7 Community - Bikes
9% 4% 4%
Community - Gathering Community - Housing Community - Identity Community - Mix Community - Retail
29%
Community - Schools
21%
Community - Special Uses Community - Views Connections
4% 4% 4% 4%
Economic Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Job Retention/Creation
BURLINGTON RESIDENTIAL PARKING PUBLIC FORM
SOUTH FREMONT/WARM SPRINGS AREA STUDIES PUBLIC WORKSHOPS
BETTER MARKET STREET SAN FRANCISCO
B PUBLIC OUTREACH
61
GRAPHIC DESIGN One of the most important aspects of planning is to create meaningful products that do not just sit on a shelf. Part of that is to develop products that are simple, easy-to-digest, and concise, so nobody becomes overwhelmed with the content and detail. I enjoy creating material that will be useful and interesting to the community, with the goal of educating, engaging, or soliciting feedback.
64
GRACE WU, AICP, LEED-AP
GRAPHIC DESIGN
65
GRACE T. WU, AICP, LEED AP www.hellogracewu.com
wu.grace@gmail.com
WORK EXPERIENCE July 2011 Present
RSG White River Junction, VT Project Planner
September 2005 - May 2006
Project planner on a range of planning projects: bicycle and pedestrian plans; streetscape design; freight network study; trail planning; parking strategies; and transportation demand management. Organized and conducted numerous interactive public and stakeholder meetings and spearheaded the development of an online crowdsourcing map tool. Produced, managed, wrote, and budgeted transportation planning projects for local municipalities, regional planning commissions, National Parks, and federal agencies. October 2008 June 2011
June 2006 September 2008
Summer 2005
Urban Designer
Worked on a broad range of prominent East Coast and international projects, from large scale master plans to waterfronts to neighborhood revitalization to transit-oriented development. Served as main technical client contact for schedules and deliverables of GIS analysis maps, site plans, section drawings, renderings, and report documentation.
SmithGroup Washington, DC Urban Design Intern
Prepared and analyzed land use feasibility and master planning for large-scale campus planning projects at Montgomery College, Clemson University, and various government campus sites. Site surveyed with a team of architects and landscape architects throughout the course of land development and helped prepare final Land Use Feasibility Report for a site in Washington, DC.
Planner + Urban Designer
SMWM San Francisco, CA & New York, NY
Public Policy Intern
Created and studied demographic and market data using GIS to support investment decisions in low-to-moderate income communities throughout Philadelphia and Washington DC. Prepared survey reports and met with community groups for developing strategies to maintain financial sustainability within their neighborhoods.
Perkins+Will San Francisco, CA Served as urban designer in an interdisciplinary team setting of planners, architects, and landscape architects on high profile urban design, master planning, and land use studies throughout California. Lead the organization and production of public workshops, coordinated project schedules, and produced visually clear deliverables, from marketing proposals to final documentation.
The Reinvestment Fund Philadelphia, PA
Summer 2004
Glatting Jackson Orlando, FL
Transportation & Urban Design Intern Created large scale base maps and site designs for charrettes in Florida and North Carolina, as well as participated in the design of community site plans for transit-oriented neighborhood developments in Florida. Researched station area planning designs for light-rail projects in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
EDUCATION University of Pennsylvania School of Design 2004 - 2006 Master of City Planning, Concentration in Urban Design and Development
Cornell University College of Architecture, Art, and Planning 2000- 2004 Bachelor of Science, Urban and Regional Studies
Cornell-in-Rome Study abroad in Rome, Italy Spring 2003 Architectural history, Immigration policy, and Drawing and art Academic Experience Teaching Assistant Spring 2006 Theory and Principles of Urban Design, Professor Jonathan Barnett Research Assistant 2004 - 2005 MultiAgent City Data Modeling Simulation, Professor Sidney Wong Publication 2004 - 2006 Co-editor for The LINK, UPenn Department of City Planning newsletter
CERTIFICATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners # 023456 LEED Accredited Professional, USGBC
TECHNICAL SKILLS AutoCAD Adobe Illustrator, InDesign, Photoshop ArcGIS SketchUp Microsoft Word, Excel, Powerpoint
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS Speaker, “Streetscapes...in Snow”, APA National Conference, 2014 Speaker, “Crowdsourcing for Planning Projects”, Northern New England APA Conference, 2014 Speaker, “Burlington Residential Parking”, Burlington Downtown and Residential Parking Forum, 2014 Bedford Pedestrian & Bicycle Connectivity Master Plan, Northern New England APA Plan of the Year 2014
Grace Wu AICP, LEED-AP Planning Urban Design Transportation Public Outreach Graphic Design
wu.grace@gmail.com www.hellogracewu.com