Trent Zimmerman talks up Federal Budget | Berry’s Bay development | QE expands
May 2021
News and views for North Sydney’s residential and business community
www.northsydneysun.com.au
SHORE, Montessori best for teacher ratios The North Sydney district’s smallest and largest schools have come up trumps on a key measure of school resourcing: student-to-teacher ratios. The tiny Montessori school at Lavender Bay has 5.9 teachers but just 46 students: a ratio of 7.8. At the other end of the spectrum, North Sydney’s SHORE, with 1668 students and 174.2 full time teacher equivalents, a ratio of 9.6. The data comes from the Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority which compiles the information on an annual basis. Of the area’s public schools, Cammeraygal—the only comprehensive high school—was the best resourced with 64.4 teachers and 770 students, a ratio of just 12.0. The more highly fancied North Sydney Girls and Boys High Schools—both selective and ranked as the best two
schools in the area by HSC results— have teacher student ratios of 13.8 and 14.5 respectively. As is to be expected, primary schools have larger student-teacher rations than high schools. Of this group, St Mary’s North Sydney has a slightly better studentteacher ratio than the next best: Anzac Park. Cammeray Public School had the highest student-teacher ratio at 20.0. The average across all public schools measured by ACARA is 14.9, falling to 13.4 for public high schools. For independent schools, the average ratio was 11.5 and for Catholic Schools, 13.9. This suggests that area public schools are resourced slightly below the overall average, and area independent schools are slightly above the average. Payroll records are used to compile the data.
School
Teachers
Students
RaƟo
Montessori
5.9
46
7.8
SHORE
174.2
1668
9.6
Loreto
108.5
1127
10.1
Redlands
152.1
1610
10.6
Aloysius
109.1
1268
11.5
Wenona
106.6
1221
11.5
Cammeraygal
64.4
770
12.0
North Syd Boys
66.1
915
13.8
North Syd Girls
62.9
911
14.5
Marist
55.6
819
14.7
St Marys
26.7
466
17.45
Anzac Park
42
747
17.8
North Syd Dem
45.7
857
18.8
Neutral Bay
46.7
917
Cammeray
43.1
860
19.6 Continued on page 3 20.0
Plans for cycle ramp off Sydney Harbour Bridge rile Council and Milsons Pt residents Milsons Point residents and North Sydney Council have rejected proposals for a cycleway ramp onto the Sydney Harbour Bridge which they believe will adversely impact on local public space. Transport for NSW released two proposals, illustrated right, this month. The first option is a linear ramp that would wind its way north through Bradfield Park on a gentle gradient. This option would reduce conflict with pedestrians closer to the entrance to Milsons Point Station. The second option is a looped ramp to be built in Bradfield Park central. This option would have a compact footprint, while still offering improved access, safety and convenience for cyclists. At its latest meeting, North Sydney Council councillors passed a motion stating that they strenuously object to any Sydney Harbour Bridge cycle ramp proposal that has a deleterious impact on “our precious parkland,” detracts from the heritage significance of the Sydney Harbour Bridge, reduces pedestrian safety and removes parking from Alfred Street South. The council also urged the state government to conduct a proper community consultation on the proposal and called for the relocation of cyclists onto the main deck of the Sydney Harbour Bridge as a mode of transport in the
future. The cycleway move has prompted intense activism from the Milsons Point Community Group which met to consider the proposals on 13 May. According to convenor Julia Connor, “nearly three years ago, the community overwhelmingly rejected very similar proposals. The only aspect that is in fact new is the proposal for a dedicated bicycle path on the footpath running alongside Bradfield Park North.” “With Milsons Point being one of the most densely populated areas of Sydney, I find it particularly galling that a few transient cyclists are given priority, seemingly with the right to an unimpeded journey anywhere across Sydney when motorists and pedestrians rarely have this opportunity.” Connor remarked that the spiral ramp proposal looks like it belongs in Luna Park with no consideration given to current frequent users of the bowling greens, “particularly as sporting facilities for our two local schools not to mention the boules group who often use the gravel patch adjacent to Burton Street. There’s also the fortnightly markets. While it may suit cyclists speeding down from the bridge, it would seem singularly unattractive to try to ride up - most will still use the Continued on page 2