GRAND VALLEY
HOUSING GUIDE SPRING 2018
A L L E N D A L E & G R A N D R A P I DS , M I C H I G A N
Spring Housing Guide inside
ST U D E N T- R U N P U B L I C A T I O N S // P R I N T · O N L I N E · M O B I L E // L A N T H O R N . C O M
M O N D A Y, A P R I L 2 , 2 0 1 8 // VO L . 52 N O. 5 4
GRAND VALLEY
EDUCATION
SASC absorbed by CLAS Academic Advising Center BY DEVIN DELY DDELY@LANTHORN.COM
The Student Academic Success Center (SASC) at Grand Valley State University will soon be a thing of the past, at least in its current form. The College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (CLAS) Academic Advising Center is in the process of merging with SASC in a move that some say will allow for a more effective use of both centers. “It’s really an opportunity to reassess,” said Suzeanne Benet, assistant vice president for academic affairs at GVSU. “The decision is being made so we can better serve our students, particularly the large number of undecided students, and we just don’t have enough advising positions to be able to accommodate all the need.” Although many job titles are changing and much is still left to be figured out, Benet says no jobs will be lost. Faculty members have been discussing the change for a while, but a final decision was only made over spring break. Benet said she felt the urge to move forward more quickly after realizing how important of a factor orientation would be. “One of the reasons why we did it when we did, before the semester was over, was because the orientation materials for incoming freshmen are literally going to press,” she said. “I wanted everything to be right in terms of where the undecided students go on all the new materials before orientation starts, not just before school starts. The actual physical moves of the SASC advisers moving into CLAS will hopefully happen during the course of the summer.” The decision to merge was largely made due to the sheer number of undecided students at GVSU—a number that is increasing, Benet said. “There are limitations from a budgetary standpoint; we can’t just keep cranking out more and more advisers and also support everything else,” she said. “As long as they don’t declare a major, students are set on the list for SASC. It was just a really big number. That was one facet. Hopefully we can do a better job of supporting the various programs that do come out of SASC still.” SEE CLAS | A2
BURNING QUESTIONS: A sign reminding students of GVSU’s smoking policies on the Little Mac Bridge on Sunday, April 1. On Thursday, March 29, student senate voted against supporting a proposal that would have banned smoking in all locations on campus except a designated area near Au Sable Hall. GVL | EMILY FRYE
Student senate votes against proposal to ban smoking on campus BY SARAH HOLLIS SHOLLIS@LANTHORN.COM
W
ith voting for next year’s Grand Valley State University student senate underway, the senate general assembly on Thursday, March 29, was used for announcing final information on long-running projects, and discussing and voting on two final proposals. Much of the general assembly was used to discuss and vote on senate support for a proposal for a smoke/e-cigarette/ vape-free campus. The proposal was brought before the body as a collaboration between several GVSU departments and was spearheaded by the Health and Wellness department. The proposal would replace GVSU’s current smoking policy,
which prohibits smoking inside buildings and within 25 feet of buildings, bus stops and the Little Mac Bridge. The proposed policy would prohibit smoking anywhere on the GVSU campus, with the exceptions of a designated smoking location next to Au Sable Hall and students’ enclosed personal vehicles. It would also create additional support and resources for students who decide they want to quit smoking. According to Amy Campbell, associate director of Campus Recreation, and Lindsey DesArmo, Health and Wellness manager for Human Resources, the main reasoning behind this proposal is to improve the health of the campus. After a lengthy discussion, the senate body voted against supporting the proposal, with
10 votes for, 23 votes against and zero abstentions. Despite the student senate body voting against supporting the current proposed policy, Campbell and DesArmo will continue to work with senate going forward and will continue the conversation about the implementation of a smoke-free campus policy. They have stated that they are committed to making sure the students are heard on this proposal and that the policy is implemented correctly. The student senate body is also willing to continue this conversation and work with these departments to improve the proposal. “I think it’s definitely really important to have constant communication with the whole task force, and there are student representatives on the Health and
Wellness task force that has been working on this,” said Jonathan Bowman, student senate president. “I think that cooperation is going to continue. This was actually the first time that this proposal was ever brought to this body before, and it was happening right at the end of the year, so it was kind of rushed. “There wasn’t really a lot of time for thoroughly questioning and discussing it because we would love to have had an outside focus group meeting before this. Just because of time, this is when we had to do it. I expect that maybe towards the end of this year or starting next year there will be some focus groups getting students together to talk about this.” Currently, GVSU is one of two four-year institutions in Michigan SEE SENATE | A2
CIVICS
‘March for Our Lives’ an example of increasing youth activism, GV administrators say BY JAMES KILBORN JKILBORN@LANTHORN.COM
VOICES: Student leaders from Forest Hills Northern High School direct the ‘March for Our Lives’ in downtown Grand Rapids on Saturday, March 24. Several figures at GVSU believe the protest is a sign of increasing youth activism. GVL | EMILY FRYE
Thousands of people congregated at Rosa Parks Circle in downtown Grand Rapids on Saturday, March 24, to call for guncontrol reform. The “March for Our Lives” was organized in response to the February shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, that left 17 people killed. Local members of the West Michigan community, including current students, came together to call on representatives in Congress to address what they see as ineffective gun-control legislation. Mark Richards, chair of the political science department at Grand Valley State University, sees the student activism displayed in the “March for Our Lives” as an opportunity to get students more involved in politics and more civically engaged. “Government and politics affects students’ lives now and in the future in areas ranging from immigration and taxes to the environment,” Richards
said via email. “Perhaps the recent events regarding school shootings will galvanize current students.” Melissa Baker-Boosamra, associate director of student life for civic engagement and assessment, also sees the event as evidence of students’ increasing role in politics, both at the local and national levels. “This was a historic march in that it was entirely led by young people,” Baker-Boosamra said. “As most people know, this was in response to the shootings at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School and really demonstrated what can happen when young people get themselves organized and the potential power that they have when they decide to organize themselves around a particular issue.” Following the shooting in Parkland, legislators have been under increasing pressure to address what some see as relaxed guncontrol laws, and solutions such as raising the minimum age for gun purchases have been brought up SEE MARCH | A2