FRIDAY • OCTOBER 30, 2015
CHICAGOMAROON.COM
THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO SINCE 1892
ISSUE 9 • VOLUME 127
University seeking changes to dining as Aramark contract ends Wendy Lee and Emily Feigenbaum Associate Editor, Contributor
Arielle Brotherson works on chalking a wall with the message: “Accessible door—No door button” as part of a protest held a week ago. ZOE KAISER | THE CHICAGO MAROON
Students protest University disability policies Margaret Glazier Maroon Contributor Students for Disability Justice (SDJ) organized a chalking of the main quad last Friday in protest of the University’s accessibility policy for students with disabilities. During the protest, members of SDJ, an organization committed to influencing University disability policy, stated that it has three goals: ending forced leaves
of absence in regards to out that several bathrooms mental health, increasing across campus, including the budget for counseling the women’s room on the and disability services on first floor of the Regenstein campus, and focusing on Library, are inaccessible beacceptance and equality for cause they do not have autodisabled members of the matic doors. The chalked phrases asUChicago community. SDJ concentrated its serted that while there is a chalking on areas like student to faculty ratio of the Classics building and six to one, there is a student Haskell Hall, where the to disability counselor ratio group says accessibility for of 3750 to one. The chalked students is limited, lacking phrases also referred to a a handicap button at certain 2006 Department of Jusentrances. SDJ also pointed DISABILITY continued on page 4
Student concerns prompt changes to O-Week sexual assault education program Eileen Li and Olivia Rosenzweig Associate Editor, Contributor The University made changes to its sexual assault education program, UMatter, during O-Week this year in response to student concerns. During O-Week, first-year students attended one of four different UMatter presentations across campus. Each presentation included a performance by Catharsis Productions entitled Sex Signals, and
there was a panel discussion with Orientation Leaders led by a staff member from the University. The new panel format marked a departure from past years’ discussions after Sex Signals, which were conducted in small groups similar to other Campus Life Meetings. According to Belinda Vasquez, the Title IX coordinator for UChicago, the change occurred as a result of student concerns about consistent messaging across the different small
group discussions. “Oftentimes [in the small groups] things could get derailed either by strong personalities or students who are not as willing to participate in what could be difficult conversations. So we took that feedback and one of the things we decided to do is…really have a specific dialogue with four people who have been specifically trained... who can facilitate the discussion but still involve peers,” Vasquez said. OWEEK continued on page 4
UChicago Dining’s fiveyear contract with food provider Aramark Corporation will soon expire in June 2016, opening the door to negotiations with other providers. The University will work with Envision Strategies, a food service consulting firm, to launch a request for proposal (RFP) process. Through the RFP process, a wide range of food service companies, such as Sodexo and Compass, will have the opportunity to bid on a contract with the University through the submission of a competitive business proposal. During the fall and
winter quarter, the University will assess the bids it receives, and a dining provider will be chosen by the end of winter quarter. The contract with this new dining provider will begin next fall quarter. Members of the College Council (CC) met in the Cox Lounge of Stuart Hall on Tuesday, October 20 to discuss the future of oncampus dining with Richard Mason, the University’s executive director of dining. The news of the contract expiration pleasantly surprised Calvin Cottrell, a Class of 2018 representative. “A lot of us were very excited about the news,” Cottrell said. “Mr. Mason made it seem like he was looking for some substantial im-
provements.” During the meeting, Mason expressed a need for higher quality food in the dining halls. To him, this means improving the quality of the ingredients, the state of facilities and equipment, and the care with which the chef prepares the meal. “We want to make sure we provide dining that really builds and sustains community. In order to build community, you have to really enjoy your dining experience,” Mason said. “How you can deliver quality food is what we’re looking for in the next contract. The framework is in place, but we’re looking for consistency in the quality of food and the quality of service. We want DINING continued on page 4
Ramos talks journalism, activism, and confrontation with Trump
Jorge Ramos, Univision anchor and Emmy-award winning journalist, addresses an audience at the IOP. ZOE KAISER | THE CHICAGO MAROON
Katherine Vega Senior Writer Eight-time Emmy Awardwinning journalist and Univision news anchor Jorge Ramos spoke to a packed audience in the I-House Assembly Hall on Wednesday night. As a self-proclaimed “proud Mexican immigrant,” Ramos emphasized the intersection between his identity and his reporting. His talk, which focused on journalism, politics, and Latinos in America, was part of the Institute of Politics’ (IOP) Road to 2016 speaker
series and the International House Global Voices lecture series. Third-year Liz Stark, a member of the IOP Student Advisory Committee, introduced Ramos, saying that he “epitomizes what it means to be a fearless journalist.” Ramos structured his 25-minute talk around three different interview clips. Each clip offered a lesson in journalism, ethics, and “taking a stand.” “People have been asking me, are you an activist, or are you a journalist?...And my answer is...that I am just
a reporter asking questions. However, there are some times in which as a journalist, you have to take a stand.” He later added, “When we don’t do that, we are failing our profession.” The first clip was of an interview with President Obama in which Ramos asked about U.S. deportation practices. The second highlighted a conversation about racial profiling during police stops with Arizona Sheriff Joe Arapio. The final clip showed Ramos’ controversial removal from Donald Trump’s press conference this summer after he repeatedly asked Mr. Trump to clarify his immigration policy. The tension between the two had arisen earlier that summer when a personal letter asking for an interview from Ramos to Trump, which contained Ramos’s phone number, was published online without Ramos’s permission. Ramos explained the logic behind his confrontation with Trump, noting that everything was intentionally planned in orRAMOS continued on page 4
IN VIEWPOINTS
IN ARTS
IN SPORTS
EDITORIAL: On Halloween costumes » Page 5
PHOTO ESSAY:Community seeks to paint Woodlawn in a new light with 67th Street mural » Page 7 & 8
SWIM & DIVE: South Siders carry momentum to Wheaton » Backpage
BLACKLIGHTxMAROON: Really sticking out » Page 6
MEN’S SOCCER: Pair of tough conference foes will test team »Page 11