ChicagoMaroon112916

NOVEMBER 29, 2016

THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO SINCE 1892

Dining Considers Replacing Einstein Bros

What’s Ahead for Graduate Student Unionization

BY EILEEN LI FORMER DEPUTY NEWS EDITOR

Dollar Milkshakes to Stay

BY YAO XEN TAN MAROON CONTRIBUTOR

After a review found that Einstein Bros. Bagels was “underutilized,” UChicago Dining is considering different options for the location. Dining hopes to announce the decision late winter quarter.

“Please note that $1 shakes will continue to be offered on Wednesdays on campus,” Executive Director of UChicago Dining Richard Mason said in a statement through a University spokesperson.

According to the 2014 Chicago Maroon Orientation Issue, “Legend has it that Einstein Bros. Bagels could move into the Reynolds Club only on the condition that they sold $1 milkshakes each week, a tradition established in the prior coffee shop.”

The evaluation of Einstein Bros. comes as part of a Request Continued on page 3

BY PETE GRIEVE NEWS EDITOR

THE MAROON’s fashion feature rigorously inquires: “Who are you wearing?

See page 5

A New Direction for the Computer Science NEWS STAFF

Recent years have seen growing investments in the Department of Computer Science, as new faculty have been hired, new collaborations have been created, and ambitious research centers have been established.

Conversations with faculty and administrators in the department reveal that these investments are part of a plan to make the Department of Computer Science “world class” by shifting its traditional emphasis on theoretical computer science to strengthen its programs in data science and systems, and collaborate on computational initiatives with other departments at the University and partner institutions.

The origin of the department’s long-standing focus on theoretical

computer science lies in its foundation in the 1980s. The Department of Computer Science was started by Robert Soare in 1983, a professor in the Department of Mathematics. Because Soare was a mathematician, there was a strong emphasis on the mathematical and theoretical sides of computer science in the early days of the department, according to John Goldsmith, a professor of computer science and linguistics.

In the 1990s and early 2000s, the department made some efforts to diversify its strengths and grow its faculty. Goldsmith said that around this time the department appointed many junior and senior faculty members who specialized in areas outside of theoretical computer science.

More recent efforts to grow the department began in 2008, Continued on page 5

involving New York University students.

James W hitehead, a senior counsel at Sidley Austin LLP and a lecturer at the Law School, said it’s very likely that a new case concerning graduate student unionization would come up in the near future and Continued on page 4

Zimmer Signs Letter Supporting DACA

NEWS EDITOR

move onto the second and third floors of John Crerar Library. “ This move is yet another step toward the division’s goal of having every department in

University of Chicago president Robert J. Zimmer signed a statement yesterday supporting the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration policy.

DACA is an executive action that was ordered by President Barack Obama in 2012. It protects children and young adults who entered the United States illegally from deportation.

Zimmer joined more than 300 other college presidents who have signed the letter in the past week. By signing the

Continued on page 5

Continued on page 3

South Siders in Final Four Against No. 5

Contributing to the Maroon

Yao Xen Tan

BY VARUN JOSHI NEWS STAFF

Renovations are underway that will allow the Computation Institute and the Department of Computer Science to

Page 16 After just a short week off, the No. 11 women’s soccer team returns to play in the NCA A Championship.

The Chicago Symphony Orchestra’s MusicNOW program pays tribute to an avant-garde all-star.

Yoko Ono Sculpture Lands in Jackson Park Page 10

Facebook isn’t a neutral site t o sha re a va r iety of v iewpoints —it’s more like an echo chamber.

TRUMP AND THE UNIVERSITY

BY PETE GRIEVE

Page 9

The Social Media Bubble

that graduate students working as teaching and research assistants at Columbia University are employees and therefore free to unionize.

Graduate students have been down this road before. August’s ruling reversed the Bushera NLRB’s 2004 decision in a similar case at Brown University and stated that the Brown decision “deprived an entire category of workers of the protections of the [National Labor Relations] Act.” That Brown decision had, in turn, reversed the pro-union decision of the Clinton-era NLRB in a 2000 case

Joins More Than 300 College Presidents

Different Quatrains: A Steve Reich Celebration at the Harris Theater

Page 6

A fter winning the right to unionize earlier this year, graduate students at private universities like the University of Chicago may see those gains reversed under a Trump presidency.

As president, Trump would have the authority to nominate new members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the government agency charged with adjudicating collective bargaining disputes. Currently, the five-member board is made up of two Democrats and one Republican, with two unfi lled vacancies. Opposition from a Republican-controlled Congress has prevented the Obama administration from fi lling those vacancies; Trump’s nominees would presumably shift the board to a Republican majority.

One of the many issues that may be affected by the changing party majority on the board is graduate student unionization.

In August, NLRB’s Democratic majority ruled in a 3–1 decision

Computer Science Dept.

Moving to Crerar

The Push to Be World Class:

BY VARUN JOSHI

VOL. 128, ISSUE 17

This fall Yoko Ono installed her new sculpture “Sky Landing” on the newly renovated Wooded Island in Jackson Park.

If you want to get involved in THE M AROON in any way, please email apply@chicagomaroon.com or visit chicagomaroon.com/apply.

Excerpts from articles and comments published in T he Chicago Maroon may be duplicated and redistributed in other media and non-commercial publications without the prior consent of The Chicago Maroon so long as the redistributed article is not altered from the original without the consent of the Editorial Team. Commercial republication of material in The Chicago Maroon is prohibited without the consent of the Editorial Team or, in the case of reader comments, the author.

All rights reserved. © The Chicago Maroon 2016

2

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

Tuesday, November 29 Rally on the Crisis of Democracy in South Korea Main Quad, 12:30–1 p.m.

Korean students on campus will gather at this rally to express their concern about the state of South Korean democracy as the political crisis surrounding president

On & Around Campus Park Geun-hye continues. The students have released a statement expressing their concern about democratic institutions in South Korea and demanding Park’s resignation.

Cecile Richards: The Future of Reproductive Rights Glenn Lloyd Auditorium, University of Chicago Law School, 1111 E. 60th Street, 4–5:30 p.m., free President of Planned Parenthood Cecile Richards will discuss what 2017 might look like for reproductive rights in the United States. A reception will follow the event.

Bite Culinary Magazine Release McCormick Tribune Lounge, Mandel Hall, 5:30–6:30 p.m.

Come celebrate the release of Bite’s fall issue and eat food from Dat Donut and Cemitas Puebla.

Career Queer: LGBT Identity at Work Ida Noyes Hall, 6–7:30 p.m.

A panel of LGBTQ+ professionals will discuss how they navigate the hiring process and modern workplace. In particular, they will be advising attendees on how to curate LinkedIn pages that are appealing to prospective employers.

Urban Readers with Shannon Lee Dawdy: “Patina” Seminary Co-Op, 6–7:30 p.m.

Anthropologist Shannon Dawdy will be discuss how Hurricane Katrina affected historic preservation in New Orleans, a city steeped in its storied past. By examining both the history of the city and the response to Katrina’s devastation, Dawdy paints a picture of a town united by a shared lost past.

Memoryhouse Magazine Fall Launch South Lounge, Reynolds Club, 6–8 p.m.

Memoryhouse magazine collects fi rst-person narratives into a quarterly literary magazine. Come to the launch of their Fall issue to pick up free copies of the issue and enjoy free food and spoken word performances.

Wednesday, November 30

1987 classic, Dirty Dancing. Kojo Daiko, Raas, and the Ballroom and Latin Dance Association will also be performing, and attendees will have the opportunity to color, drink hot cocoa, and unwind after a long quarter.

Thursday, December 1 Opening Celebration: Miriam’s Café at the Smart Smart Museum of Art, 4–6 p.m.

The cafe at the Smart is being officially renamed in honor of the late Miriam Graham, a dedicated supporter of the museum. The ceremony will include performances of musical pieces related to coffee and tea, including Bach’s Coffee Cantata, and will have free refreshments. The baristas at Miriam’s cafe will also be participating in a latte art competition.

Public Newsroom Workshop #3: Leor Galil Build Coffee, Experimental Station, 6100 S. Blackstone Avenue, 6–8 p.m.

Journalist Leor Galil will be leading a discussion about the proper way to cover music and art in the media. Leor covers Chicago’s art and music scene for the Chicago Reader, as well as for his radio show, The Deepest Dish.

Student Meeting About Spring 2016 Climate Survey Results The Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality, 5733 S. University Avenue, 4:30–6:30 p.m.

The Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality will be hosting a student meeting to discuss the recent Campus Climate Survey results. The Climate Survey was released on November 19, and, as Adam Thorp reported, showed gaps in the way certain students perceived racism on campus. Those interested are encouraged to show interest on Facebook.

The Invention of Coinage and Its subsequent Use in the Achaemenid Persian Empire Oriental Institute, 1155 E. 58th Street, 12:15 p.m.–1 p.m.

Tasha Vorderstrasse of the Oriental Institute will discuss the invention of coinage during the Achaemenid period of the Persian Empire in the Oriental Institute Gallery. Don’t miss this exciting discussion, accompanied by a lunch, about this moment in history.

Study at the Smart Smart Museum of Art, 9 p.m.–noon Study spaces will be set up throughout the Smart’s exhibits so students can prepare for finals and enjoy art all at the same time. Free pizza and coffee will be available in the lobby of the museum.

Demand for Unbiased News Quadrangle Club Library, 2:15–3:15 p.m.

Why do consumers gravitate towards government-controlled news outlets even when there are independent outlets are available? Andrey Simonov, a Ph.D. candidate at the Booth School, will present his and his co-author’s findings on the question. This talk is part of the Milton Friedman Institute’s 2016 Economics of Media and Communications Conference, which continues on Friday. Information about other talks given as part of the conference can be found online.

Europe and the United States in the Trump Administration Institute of Politics, 12:15–1:15 p.m.

Maria Latella, an Italian journalist and former Institute of Politics (IOP) fellow, will talk about what Trump’s presidency might mean for Europe. The talk is a part of the IOP’s International Policy Program.

The event will be off the record, and lunch will be served.

Write for Rights McCormick Lounge, Reynolds Club, 5–8:30 p.m.

Each year, Amnesty International targets about a dozen human rights abuses and coordinates waves of letters calling for their resolution. Take a few minutes out of your week to join Amnesty International’s letter-writing drive and hear from a guest-speaker.

Joseph Stiglitz and Markus Brunnermeier: The Euro Room 104, Harper Center, noon–1:15 p.m., free Join professors Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia and Markus Brunnermeier of Princeton to discuss the future of the euro and the European financial system.

Understanding the Trump Phenomenon Room 224, Social Sciences Research Building, 1–3 p.m.

Join four eminent professors in the University’s history department gather to discuss this historic turn in American politics. More discussions by history faculty on the issue will follow in January.

Compulsive Practice Hyde Park Arts Center, 5020 S. Cornell Avenue, 6–7 p.m.

Take a look at the “Compulsive Practice” exhibit at the Hyde Park Arts Center, which explores how artists and activists with AIDS use different artistic mediums as means of expression. Some of the artists and activists participating in the exhibit include James Wentzy and Scarlot Harlot.

First Friday on Criminal Justice Cloister Club, Ida Noyes Hall, 1–3 p.m., RSVP online This event in the First Friday series, which marks University of Chicago Service Center’s 20th anniversary, focuses on criminal justice, restorative justice, and re-entry. It features a panel including academics, government officials, and advocates followed by round-table discussions.

The Consul General of the People’s Republic of China Assembly Hall, I-House, 6–7:30 p.m.

Hong Lei, the consul general of China to Midwestern United States, will deliver a talk at International House about fostering friendly U.S.-China relations and further cooperation between the two countries.

Real Talk: Mental Health in the Black Community Center for Identity and Inclusion, 5710 S. Woodlawn Avenue At this community discussion, the Organization of Black Students plans to pivot from high-profile mental health challenges experienced by some black celebrities to discuss mental health in the broader black community. A representative of Student Counseling will attend to present resources available at the school.

The Stela and the State: Monuments and Politics in Ancient Mesopotamia Oriental Institute, 7–9 p.m., free Harvard professor Irene Winter will deliver a talk on the importance of public monuments and their imagery in early Mesopotamian cultures. Winter will summarize what we know about the monuments and provide a perspective about how rulers used them to communicate to the public.

Music Forum Fall Concert Hallowed Grounds, Reynolds Club, 7:30–10 p.m.

The Music Forum is an RSO that tries to encourage music outside of formal settings at the University of Chicago. At this end of quarter event they will host several University-based artists and groups.

Uncommon Nights: Hot, Hot, Hot! Reynold’s Club, 10 p.m.–midnight Uncommon Nights will be serving hot dogs (and vegetarian pasta, salad, and lemonade) while showing the

Friday, December 2

Demand for Unbiased News Saieh Hall for Economics, 2:15–3:15 p.m.

Huge amounts of money and effort are spent every election cycle on television advertisements. At this talk, two researchers will present a paper in which they found that spending in 2004 and 2008 did not increase the overall turnout, but could increase one candidate’s share of the vote. This talk is part of the Milton Friedman Institute’s 2016 Economics of Media and Communications Conference, which continues on Friday. Information about other talks given as part of the conference can be found online.

Post-Election Strategic Planning With Undocumented Students Center for Identity and Inclusion, 5710 S. Woodlawn Avenue, 6:30–8 p.m.

The University of Chicago Coalition for Immigrant Rights is organizing in anticipation of Donald Trump’s promised crack-down on undocumented immigrants. At this meeting, they will lay out their plans for winter quarter and provide updates on progress since their fi rst planning meeting.

International House Open Mic Night Assembly Hall, I-House, 7–9 p.m.

Stop by International House for an open mic night!

Take a break from studying in order to prepare (or not) a performance. Or, alternatively, head over to enjoy some refreshments while studying with friends.

Sign-ups start at 6:30 p.m.

Study at the Logan Center Logan Center, 9 p.m.–midnight The Logan Center will be open late for students studying for finals. Free cookies, coffee, and hot chocolate will be provided. A massage therapist will also be available to help students de-stress.

Saturday, December 3 African American Pioneers: Eleven P.M. Screening Room 201, Logan Center, 7 p.m.

The Film Studies Center will be showing Eleven P.M., a 1928 drama by Richard Maurice. The surrealist film centers around a poor violinist who swears to protect an orphan from local evils. The movie is known for its bizarre ending, in which the ghost of the violinist seeks revenge after his untimely death.

Rachel Ruiz: “When Penny Met POTUS” 57th Street Books, 1301 E. 57th Street, 10:30–11 a.m.

Listen to a reading and grab a signed copy of Rachel Ruiz’s first children’s’ book When Penny Met POTUS. In the book, Penny attempts to learn about her mom’s boss “POTUS.” Ruiz worked for Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.

45th Annual Art Open House 4810 S. Ellis, 10 a.m.–6 p.m.

Local artists will be showing off various crafts and artwork, such as painted silk and ceramics, glass jewelry, silk wearable art, photography, quilts, and fiber art.

Timuel Black at the Annual Meeting of the Vivian G. Harsh Society Augustana Lutheran Church, 5500 S. Woodlawn Avenue, 2–4 p.m.

The Vivian G. Harsh Society will have its annual meeting at the Augustana Lutheran Church. This meeting is dedicated to the launch of the Timuel D. Black Emerging Scholars Program. Timuel D. Black (A.M. ’54), a professor emeritus at the City Colleges of Chicago and an important historian of the South Side in the 20th century will speak.

Holiday Bazaar at the United Church of Hyde Park United Church of Hyde Park, 1448 E. 53rd Street, 10 a.m.–4 p.m.

Members of the United Church of Hyde Park will be selling unique goods, including gifts, jewelry, and holiday decorations.

Physics With a Bang! Holiday Lecture and Open House Kersten Physics Teaching Center, 11 a.m. and 2 p.m., open house from noon–4 p.m.

Professors Heinrich Jaeger and Sidney Nagel will be doing demonstrations that exemplify their research.

This event will give students, parents, and all aspiring scientists and opportunity to have a hands-on interaction with science. They will also be giving tours of their laboratories in the afternoon.

Study at the Arts Incubator Arts Incubator, 301 E. Garfield Boulevard, noon–3 p.m.

Need to get away from campus for a while? There will be buses running every half hour between the Reg, South Campus, and the Arts Incubator. Students will have spaces to study, and free snacks will be provided.

South Side Home Movie Project Currency Exchange, 305 E. Garfield Boulevard, 5–7 p.m.

The South Side Home Movie Project archives amateur films from across the South Side of Chicago and periodically screens them, as part of an effort to elevate the role of home movies in fi lm history and capture a moment of life in Chicago’s neighborhoods. Donors to the project will screen their own home videos, and guests are welcome to offer their own.

Sunday, December 4 Robyn C. Spencer: The Revolution Has Come Seminary Co-Op, 3–4 p.m.

Author and professor Robyn Spencer will be discussing her book, The Revolution Has Come, which details the origins of the Black Panther movement in Oakland, CA. In particular, she will focus on power and gender dynamics within the group, and examines the influence that the Black Panthers had on the maturation of countless black youth in the late sixties.

Handel’s Messiah Rockefeller Chapel, 5850 S. Woodlawn Avenue, 3–5 p.m., $5 for students Listen to Handel’s Messiah as performed by the Chicago’s Men’s A Cappella and the Rockefeller Chapel Choir in one of Hyde Park’s oldest traditions, dating back to 1930. Tickets cost $5 for students and between $25 to $50 for others.

Love Liberation: 50 Years of Black Panther Party History Saieh Hall for Economics, 6–8 p.m.

The Center for the Study of Race, Politics, and Culture will be hosting a discussion about the gender and sexuality dynamics within the Black Panther movement.

Musical artist Avery R. Young will also be performing.

Energy and the Environment in the Trump Administration Room 021, Saieh Hall for Economics, 5:30–7 p.m., register online Senior staff from the George W. Bush administration will be discussing what a Republican Congress and President might mean for the United States’s energy policy in the next four years.

Advance Screening: Office Christmas Party Max Palevsky Cinema, Ida Noyes Hall, 7–9 p.m., free Doc Films is advance screening the movie Office Christmas Party. When the CEO (played by Jennifer Aniston), tries to close a company branch run by her brother (played by T.J. Miller), he and the Chief Technology Officer (played by Jason Bateman) must throw an epic Christmas party to try and save the company.

Patrick Jagoda: “Network Aesthetics” Wilder House, 5811 S. Kenwood Avenue, 4:30–6:30 p.m.

Associate professor Patrick Jagoda will discuss his book Network Aesthetics. The book explores how popular media and artistic forms make sense of decentralized network metaphors and infrastructures.

Tuesday, December 6 Tyehimba Jess: “Olio” Seminary Co-Op, 5751 S. Woodlawn Avenue, 6–7:30 p.m.

Tyehimba Jess reads from Olio, a poetry book he published last spring. Jess has received multiple awards in poetry and is an associate professor at the College of Staten Island.

Fireside Chat With Inter-Faith Leaders Chicago Theological Seminary, 5:15 p.m.

Come talk to Rabbi Herman Schaalman and hear the winning essay of the Schaalman Interreligious Award.

Schaalman, who turned 100 in April, fled the Nazis in the 1930s and then spent decades at the head of a Chicagoland congregation.

Wednesday, December 7 R.J. Nelson: Dirty Waters Seminary Co-Op, 6–7:30 p.m.

R.J. Nelson was meant to bring change to Chicago’s waterfront when he was appointed as the city’s Director of Harbors and Marine Services, the “harbor boss.”

The last four directors had found their way into federal prison. Nelson’s book narrates his time in the position.

Campaign for the Tenth President of the Republic of Ireland Hyde Park Art Center, 5020 S. Cornell Avenue, 6–7 p.m.

William Delaney was a little more than 10-years-old when he died, while in the care of the government of the Republic of Ireland. Artist Seamus Dolan pushed to have Delaney temporarily named President of the Republic, in order to recognize the state’s failure.

Dolan will discuss his project at this event.

Thursday, December 8 Gertrude Stein and Poetry in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction Smart Museum of Art, 5:30–7:30 p.m.

This pair of events will consider the poetry of Gertrude Stein through a variety of media. The fi rst event in this series will look at the Smart Museum’s exhibition “There was a whole collection made.” The next event will be held next week at the Poetry Foundation.

The Innocents Hyde Park Art Center, 5020 S. Cornell Avenue, 1:30 p.m., free The University of Chicago Service League will show The Innocents (2016) at their free monthly movie screening. The Innocents explores the brutal aftermath of World War II on one Polish convent.

Poetry Reading: Alan Shapiro and Reginald Gibbons Seminary Co-Op, 6–7:30 p.m.

Poets Alan Shapiro and Reginald Gibbons will read from their newly published collections, Life Pig and Last Lake.

Friday, December 9

Study at the Oriental Institute Oriental Institute, 1155 E. 58th Street, 9 p.m.–midnight End UChicago Arts’s “study at” series at the Oriental Institute. Sit amongst ancient Mesopotamian artifacts, and sip on some coffee while studying for your Syriac, Akkadian, or any other final. If things get stressful, take a deep breath on one of the meditation cushions.

Joseph Stern Keynote at Conference on Meaning, Metaphor and Maimonides Frank Institute for the Humanities, 1100 E. 57th Street, Sunday afternoon through Monday evening On Sunday, December 4 and on Monday, December 5, join faculty from across the nation to honor Professor Emeritus of Philosophy and Inaugural Director of the Center for Jewish Studies Josef Stern. Stern has done research in semantics, the philosophy of language, and in medieval Jewish and Islamic philosophy. Stern will deliver the closing address at 4:30 p.m. on Monday, and more information about the program can be found online.

Monday, December 5

Keramet Reiter: 23/7 Seminary Co-Op, 6–7:30 p.m.

Keramet Reiter, a professor at UC Irvine School of Law and the Department of Criminology, Law, and Society, will discuss her book 23/7: Pelican Bay Prison and the Rise of Long-Term Solitary Confinement.

The book discusses the overuse of solitary confi nement in a prison which led to a prison-wide hunger strike.

present to discuss their vision and answer questions about the project.

The World is the Children’s Classroom: A Documentary in Progress Saieh Hall for Economics, 4:30–5:45 p.m.

The Center for the Study of Race, Politics, and Culture will be hosting a preview screening of the documentary, “The World is the Children’s Classroom: The History and Legacy of the Black Panther Party’s Oakland Community School.” The producers of the film will be

Not Just Another Pretty Face: The Unveiling Hyde Park Art Center, 5020 S. Cornell Avenue, 7–11 p.m., $35 suggested donation This program pairs patrons and artists to create new pieces and support the artist and the Art Center. More than 80 pieces created in this collaboration will be unveiled at this event.

Saturday, December 10 Exhibition Walkthrough: Shared Eye Renaissance Society, fourth floor, Cobb Hall, 2 p.m.

A few weeks into the opening of its exhibition of Sadie Benning’s work, titled “Shared Eye,” The Society’s Assistant Curator will lead a walk-through.

Black and Brown Presents the Dessert Shoppe Currency Exchange, 305 E. Garfield Boulevard, 5–8 p.m.

Four artists drawing from African diaspora traditions will “explore the mythos of sweetness,” at this event.

Art for the People: For the People’s December Showcase Experimental Station, 6100 S. Blackstone Avenue, 5–9 p.m.

The For the People’s Artist Collective has spent the year since its founding using art to agitate against injustice in Chicago, especially related to police violence against black people. This showcase provides an opportunity to support their work and mark their first anniversary.

3

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

Asked if UofC Disavows White Nationalist Alum Richard Spencer, Spokesperson Says Alumni Don’t Speak for University

BY PETE GRIEVE NEWS EDITOR

A University of Chicago spokesperson walked a narrow line when asked if the University or President Zimmer disavow Richard Spencer (M.A. ’03), a leader of the white nationalist movement and coiner of the term “alt-right.”

University spokesperson Jeremy Manier said in an e-mail Monday, “The views of individuals among 160,000 alumni do not speak for the Universi-

ty.” Manier did not explicitly reference Spencer, and he did not denounce his white-nationalist views. Unprompted, Manier also reaffi rmed the University’s commitment to “the values of diversity and inclusion.”

Spencer’s brief time at the University of Chicago is frequently cited in profi les that present him as a new, intellectual figure in the white-nationalist movement.

According to a Chicago Tribune columnist, Spencer “credits his time at the University of Chicago…for his intellectual flowering.”

The Dallas prep school that Spencer attended—St. Mark’s School of Texas— denounced Spencer Friday. Headmaster David W. Dini addressed the school community in a statement after Spencer shouted versions of Nazi slogans at an alt-right conference on March 19—“Hail Trump, hail our people, hail victory,” he shouted.

“This has been deeply troubling and terribly upsetting to our whole school community. At St. Mark’s, we reject racism and bigotry in all its forms and ex-

pressions,” Dini wrote in the statement.

“Our mission, values, and programs stand in direct opposition to these vulgar ideas. In light of such comments, our mission to develop boys of strong character, compassion, empathy, and courage has increasing relevance and importance.”

A crowdfunding page started by St. Marks’ class of 1997, Spencer’s class, has raised more than $50,000 to oppose him.

The funds will be donated to an agency resettling refugees in the Dallas area.

Short on Funds, Crew Team Crowd funds for a New Boat

BY KATIE AKIN DEPUTY NEWS EDITOR

The University crew team has started an online crowdfunding campaign to purchase a new eight-person boat. Currently, the team has three eight-person boats in their fleet, one of which is over 20 years old. “ It’s rare for a team to race in a boat that is more than eight years old, let alone one that is 25 years old,” second-year team member Carl Padgett wrote in an e-mail. “While it has served us well, it’s also reaching a point where it’s no longer viable to practice in, let alone race.”

The crew team operates as a club rather than a varsity sport, so its expenses are not fully covered by the University. Over 75 percent of the team’s funding comes from membership fees and donations.

The team estimates that it will cost

$40,000 to purchase a new boat that is “competition-ready.”

To raise the money, the crew team is utilizing the University’s new crowdfunding platform. Only University-affiliated projects are allowed on the site, which is managed by the Office of Alumni Relations and Development.

“So far, our campaign has just begun, but we are already seeing donations coming in. We owe it to UChicago’s alumni relations department and to the software provider that we’ve seen the kind of success we’ve had so far, but we are still a long way from achieving our goal,” Padgett wrote.

In past years, the crew team has ra i sed money for new equ ipment through fundraising events, including the annual “Ergathon,” an all-day event wherein the team members try to log as many miles as possible on indoor rowing machines. However, the money earned through such events is often in-

sufficient to cover the team’s expenses.

“Purchases of new equipment and boats is often done by taking on debt or pulling money from other areas in ord er to keep our club competitive,” Padgett wrote. “It certainly doesn’t feel right when we have to cancel our travel plans to a race for financial reasons,

Courtesy of University of Chicago Crew

“To our country’s leaders we say that DACA should be upheld, continued, and expanded” Continued from front page

statement, the presidents voiced their support for DACA and offered to meet with U.S. leaders to discuss the issue.

“To our country’s leaders we say that DACA should be upheld, continued, and expanded. We are prepared to meet with you to present our case,” the letter reads.

“Since the advent of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in 2012, we have seen the critical benefi ts of this program for our students, and the highly positive impacts on our institutions and communities.”

In 2010, the University said that it could not take a stance on the DREAM

Act, a failed piece of legislation that would have created a path to citizenship for undocumented high school graduates who entered the United States before age 16 and meet other criteria. The University cited the 1967 Kalven Report, which states that it must remain neutral on political issues.

Zimmer was not immediately available for comment on his signing of the letter or on why he does not perceive his signature to violate the Kalven report.

The statement does not explicitly mention the election of Donald Trump, whose 10-point immigration plan states that he will “immediately terminate” DACA.

CLASSIFIEDS 2BR Nice Co-Op Apt 53rd Ellis 78K

especially when we won it the previous year.”

The fundraising campaign will end on January 11, allowing the team to potentially purchase new equipment before the spring season begins. At press time, the team has raised $1,070 of its $40,000 goal.

More than 740,000 people have been approved for DACA, which Trump would be able to revoke when he takes office.

In November 21 video, Trump listed a number of executive actions that he says he will order on his first day in office. That list did not include revoking the executive action on DACA, but he said that he will direct the Department of Labor to investigate “abuses of visa programs that undercut the American worker.”

On November 18, Provost Daniel Diermeier sent a campus-wide e-mail reaffirming the University’s commitment to supporting undocumented students.

Einstein’s to be Replaced Continued from front page

for Proposal (RFP) by UChicago Dining. The RFP thoroughly reviews all campus dining options, including looking at the average transactions per day of every on-campus cafe relative to each other.

“UChicago Dining is working with Bon Appétit to evaluate different options that offer exciting lunch and dinner menus that meet the needs of the campus community in the future,” Mason said.

The review and possible closure of Einstein Bros. comes just weeks after the closure of the Classics, Stuart, and BSD cafés.

4

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

“With President Trump making nominations, there are going to be some strongly anti-labor views” Continued from front page

be decided by Trump appointees.

“He would have to nominate individuals to fi ll those two [vacant] slots, they would have to be confi rmed by the Senate, and then they would have to await another case. The labor board actually decides cases that are brought to it; it doesn’t simply make pronouncements in a vacuum, so a board fi lled with his appointments would have to await a new case involving presumably a different college or university to come up before it. I think you can be pretty certain that would happen fairly soon.”

In addition to the two vacancies that he could fi ll immediately, Trump would also have the right to choose the replacements of the two Democratic board members whose terms expire in 2018 and 2019, and the Republican board member whose term expires next year.

Each member of the NLRB serves for five years.

“During his four-year term, assuming he’s not reelected after that, [Trump] could pretty much remake the NLRB membership. All five of the positions… during his term would come open, and he would be able to appoint whomever he wanted,” Whitehead said.

Whitehead also spoke about the possibility that a Trump presidency would lead to more anti-labor views represented among U.S. Court of Appeals judges, making it more difficult for pro-unionization activists to challenge NLRB decisions. In theory, Republicans in Congress and the Trump administration could propose an amendment to the National Labor Relations Act that would redefi ne “employee” in a way that explicitly ex-

cludes graduate student assistants.

“I don’t view that as a high likelihood because this is a very important issue for colleges and universities, but it may not be sufficiently important to the world generally for Congress to want to expend its scarce resources on legislating in this area. But because there were a number of other NLRB decisions that were particularly controversial, I suppose it’s not inconceivable that a Republican Congress might propose a bill that would affect the National Labor Relations Act in a number of different ways to deal with a number of these decisions, and the Columbia University decision could simply get lumped in,” Whitehead said.

Laura Weinrib, an assistant professor at the Law School, said that the NLRB appointments are Trump’s most likely and easiest method of impacting graduate student unionization. “ We can expect that, with President Trump making nominations, there are going to be some strongly anti-labor views represented on the board….

I would say there’s a good chance that the board will end up reversing itself,” Weinrib said.

In the case of such a reversal, Weinrib suggests that graduate students focus on persuading universities that it’s in their best interest to recognize unions voluntarily, as New York University agreed to do in 2013, preempting a legal challenge.

“I think the best strategy for the graduate students is to demonstrate that they can work together with the University in a way that will improve outcomes for both the University and for students.

Certainly that’s what many of the empirical studies suggest in the context of

public universities, state universities, that have graduate student unions. They report high levels of cooperation between graduate student mentors and graduate students and in many cases better placements for graduate students after completing their programs.”

The University has said that it does not support graduate students’ efforts to unionize. President Robert J. Zimmer and Provost Daniel Diermeier released a statement in August following the NLRB ruling warning of their perceived possible negative effects of unionization.

In the statement, Zimmer and Diermeier stated that they think a union might come between students and faculty in crucial academic and professional decisions.

“These decisions could range from which classes students teach, to how best to collaborate with scholars in other departments, to the steps students can take to further their long-term career development. Ceding the power to bargain over some or all of these decisions to a union, which by design focuses on the collective interests of members while they are in the union in the short-term, could make it more difficult for students to reach their individual educational goals,” the statement read.

The University News Office did not respond to a request for comment as of the time of publication.

After the NLRB ruling in August, Graduate Students United (GSU ), a graduate student organization in the University, has stated that it plans to push for unionization on campus. The group subsequently told THE M AROON that it hoped to hold a vote in March or April.

Juliana Locke, a second year master’s student in the Divinity School and member of GSU, said that Trump wouldn’t change the group’s plans for organizing on campus. “Obviously, that is a concern.

It is not directly impacting our plans in any concrete way other than affi rming our need to form a strong union that can protect student workers and all marginalized students and members of our community as soon as possible. Any kind of national-level appointments will take a while to go into effect and obviously we would prefer a pro-union NLRB board, [but] it is not changing any of our strategy except for solidifying our mission.”

Currently, GSU is organizing a card campaign to assess support for a union among graduate student workers on campus, and hopes to hold a vote by the end of the school year. Most of the students voting on the unionization issue would be teaching assistants or research assistants, and if suffi cient students are in favor of a union, GSU will put forth a petition to the administration.

Locke emphasized that GSU’s work on campus will continue even in the anti-union environment of a Trump administration. “We prefer not to think in apocalyptic ‘what if’ situations. Graduate Students United has been organizing for about a decade on campus and accomplishing, not as a student union but just as a student group, supporting the rights of any student who feels that they are experiencing injustice or not having their voices heard.”

This is the first in a series of articles looking at the impact of a Trump administration on the University of Chicago community.

.

E T A L S N A E L C A N O K N A B LIFELINE CHECKING: HOW BETTER BANKING STARTS. If you’re ready to get your banking record back on track, LifeLine Checking is a smart step forward. Low opening deposit. Unlimited check writing. Visa® check card. Mobile and online banking. Don’t let past financial challenges hold back your ability to bank.

Open an account today. Learn more at bankfinancial.com/page/lifeline/

LifeLine Checking: For complete terms governing the LifeLine Checking Account, consult the Customer Agreement and Disclosure Statement, which can be found at www.bankfinancial.com/page/disclosures. The terms of the LifeLine Checking Account, including fees or features, may change. LifeLine Checking Account Terms as of 09/01/2016: Minimum Deposit to Open = $50. Monthly Service Charge = $5 (waived for the first statement cycle). Free eStatements. © 2016 BankFinancial. Member FDIC

5

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

“[Crerar] will also serve as a home for innovative programs around data science.”

Comp Sci Department Will Be Systems-Focused Continued from front page

when University alumnus William Eckhardt made a gift to establish the William Eckhardt Distinguished Service Professor Chair in Computer Science. The gift prompted the creation of a committee which included Goldsmith, who was Chairman of the department at the time, and Robert Fefferman, then the dean of the Physical Sciences Division, to figure out what “we should prioritize and define as the most important direction for the department to go if we want to make this a truly world class department,” Goldsmith said.

The department modeled its vision for growth on Princeton’s and Harvard’s computer science departments, both highly regarded departments, but relatively small in terms of faculty.

“One of the big questions that came up in every meeting was size—the department at that time was around 20 full time faculty, and even the smallest outstanding CS departments were above 30. We took Princeton and Harvard to be our models of outstanding universities that had small computer science departments. So part of the question was what is the smallest size a really world class CS department can be, and the answer that we had was around 30, and we were about 20 at that point,” Goldsmith said.

In order to hire excellent faculty, the University needed a leader with administrative ability to attract talent and resources, according to Goldsmith. The department considered using the gift from Eckhardt to do this, but decided to spend a few more years searching. Instead, the gift was used to hire Andrew Chien, previously vice president of research at Intel Corporation, and an expert in the branch of computer science called systems.

Chien has been at the center of a recent effort to hire a number of junior faculty in systems. Systems is a branch of computer science that studies operating systems, computer architecture, and networks. According to Chien, systems was a natural area to expand into because it serves as the synthesis area between mathematical and theoretical computer science and the construction of “large scale complex systems, as evidenced by the internet and the Google search engine. So systems was viewed as the way to balance the department by creating a sort of second pole to complement the excellence in mathematics.”

Two years ago, the University made an even bigger effort to make the department top 10 or 15 in the world, according to Goldsmith. Goldsmith stated that a committee was put together and decided to bring Michael Franklin on to be the next Chairman of the department, with the expectation that he would increase hiring and strengthen the department in other areas of computer science, especially data science.

“We’ve had a lot of success in building out systems. But with Mike Franklin coming, there’s a decided focus on growing up activities in the data sciences, machine learning, and artificial intelligence,” Chien said. “In all fields at the University, it is all about acquiring data and performing analysis and trying to create new intellectual insights. Fundamentally, if it works right, it is more than just crunching numbers, but is some kind of intellectual accelerator or enhancer for academic inquiry.”

Besides strengthening the department, the recent investments in data science will prompt collaborations with other departments and computational initiatives around the University. Edward Kolb, dean of the Physical Sciences Division, told the University of Chicago News Office that this collaboration will establish a “vital computational culture throughout the University.”

The sciences are an important exam-

ple of a field that will benefit from recent investments in data science. “It used to be that science was focused around experimentation, but now science is also concerned with large scale computations to understand the consequences of theories and explore alternative theories, and increasingly to perform analysis on large amounts of data, whether you are working on environmental science or material science or biology,” said Ian Foster, director of the Computation Institute, a joint initiative between the University and Argonne National Laboratory that advances scientific research through computational methods.

Additionally, growth in data science will complement new methods in the social sciences, such as pulling data from non-traditional sources like social networking data or image data from Google Street View, Foster stated. Chien added that data science will be helpful to both the Booth School of Business and UChicago Medicine, as data science can help to analyze and model e-commerce transactions, and help doctors organize and interpret their patient data.

The recent growth in the department will also bolster initiatives with institutions the University is partnered with, such as the Marine Biological Laboratory, the Computational Institute, and Argonne National Laboratory. According to Ian Foster, director of the Computation Institute, Argonne National Laboratory’s recent project to build next generation supercomputing systems requires advancements in software, computer architecture, systems, and theoretical computer science, and recent faculty hires in those areas over the past few years will help by working on these problems.

Establishing computational collaborations between the department and other University initiatives will be important to Franklin’s leadership. Franklin told the University of Chicago News Office this year that “UChicago is uniquely positioned to take a leadership role in the emerging computational and data-driven world, due to its broad strengths and excellence across the spectrum of sciences, policy, business and medicine, and in recognizing the importance of collaboration and cross-fertilization across these domains.”

While the department has not formally talked about expanding into engineering, Goldsmith says that it might be necessary in the future. “The people in the biological sciences convinced president Robert J. Zimmer and former Provost Thomas F. Rosenbaum that they don’t have a future in the 21st century unless there is something like molecular engineering here. And I think the same could be said for computer science: you can’t have a great university without a great computer science department, and you can’t do computer science without something that looks like engineering.”

While many of UChicago’s academic peers already have well established computer science departments, the University has the potential to lead in many subfields, according to Foster.

“Rather than simply be a place like Berkeley and Stanford, we have the opportunity to look at the very essential issues that need to be addressed by a computer science department that will be dominant in the next 30 years, such as data science.

We need to look to identify those areas where Chicago has the unique opportunities to lead, such as the intersection between the social sciences and computing,” Foster said. “We’re a pretty small and relatively new department, and now we have the opportunity to grow substantially, so we can work to create a CS department for the 21st century.”

the University,” the University library announced in September.

The move will deal with the lack of space in Ryerson, accommodate growth in faculty and students, and house the University’s computational and computer science initiatives in one place.

The University has been planning since at least January to expand computer science research and education on campus.

“It’s going to be wonderful,” Computation Institute Director Ian Foster said.

“First, we don’t have enough space at the moment. Secondly, the Department of Computer Science and the Computation Institute are not co-located, with one in Ryerson and the other in Searle.

And finally, it gives us the opportunity to design a more modern space, as Ryerson is pretty old.”

John Crerar, an American industrialist, provided for the creation of a public library in his will (which included a provision that “dirty French novels and all skeptical trash and works of questionable moral tone shall never be found in this library”). The library opened in 1894. After a period of independence and some time on the campus of the Illinois Institute of Technology, the library merged with the University, on the condition it would remain free to the public.

Continued from front page

new or renovated space by 2022,” said Edward “Rocky” Kolb, dean of the Physical Sciences Division.

The Computation Institute is a joint initiative between the University and Argonne National Laboratory that advances scientific research through computational methods.

Currently, the Department of Computer Science is located in Ryerson, and the Computation Institute is based in Searle Chemistry Laboratory.

Senior lecturer in the computer science department Adam Shaw said that he supports the idea of moving the department to one space.

“The other institutions I have been at have always had their computer labs, classrooms, and offices in one space, and our department is splintered that way, and it would be nice if we were all together—it would be very productive for working and for learning,” Shaw said.

The first and lower f loors of Crerar will have “critical library space with associated research support services and selected collections, public and study spaces, and teaching/seminar spaces.

These floors will also serve as a home for innovative programs around data science and data-driven discovery that will support faculty and students across

This Week’s Puzzle

By Daniel Ruttenberg

R

M L

A

V

S

H

P

G

O

H

E

B

R

S

S

U

B

G

N

I

Y

A

R

E

T

E

E

A

U

E

L

P

B

E

L

L

T

O

N

D

R

N

N

K

N

T

A

E

H

T

E

C

H

A

T

S

A

P

Y

E

D

A

L

I

F

S

T

T

Y

I

T

H

E

A

L

P

E

H

H

O

T

S

U

R

O M E

O

Y

O

H

U

Y

P

N

I

E

A

F

A

A

R

C

A

D

I

A

R

O

G

N

S

T

E

P

M H

H

N

I

A

S

F

W E

L

A

E

T

A

W H

N

M M Y

O

F

O

N

I

N

K

S

T

A

A

N

A

D

N

U

S

E

D

V

D

I

M E

N

T

N

E

T

M A

S

D

E

E

G

N

S

E

A

R

K

E

S

E

M O

B

H

R

O

N

E

Y

D

S

E

Z

A

T

I

L

Y

T

S

R

D

S

E

R

H

A

G

E

D

A

E

W R

I

T

N

G

N

M W H

Tight Schedule: 0

0

0

Secret Society: 00

00

Binary KenKen: 0

00

Teleporting Network: 0000

0

6

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

The Social Media Bubble Facebook Isn’t a Neutral Site to Share a Variety of Viewpoints—It’s More Like an Echo Chamber

Jasmine Wu As of the third quarter of 2016, Facebook had 1.79 billion monthly active users. What once started as a site to connect with distant relatives and old friends has become something so much more. Forty percent of the United States population now gets its news from Facebook, which acts as a convenient medium for news publications to share their articles and bring attention to current events. Yet given the proliferation of ads and fabricated news stories that are shared on the social media site in order to get clicks and generate revenue, should Facebook, as a for-profit corporation, have so much influence on how people access their news?

The theoretical premise of Facebook as a platform for users to utilize their First Amendment rights may be empowering for many, but it is important to take note of the company’s own incentives. Facebook generated $9.1 billion in advertising revenue in North America during the first nine months of this year; 95.2 percent of its total revenue was from advertising in 2015.

The company’s dependence on ads means that it gives information about its users to advertising agencies, slicing each person into more than 50,000 unique categories. Ads are shown to people based on not only the standard demographics such as age, gender, and location, but also on numerous other factors like if you’re an international traveler or if you’re more liberal in U.S. politics.

One such category that warrants special attention is “ethnic affinity,” which Facebook claims is different from race. Ethnic affinity is sourced from an individual’s inter-

ests and activities on the site. In giving advertisers the ability to target specific groups, Facebook has given them the ability to exclude specific groups by their “ethnic affinity.”

To prove that this could actually happen, ProPublica bought an ad targeting Facebook members who were house hunting, and excluded those who had an “ethnic affinity” for African-American, Asian-American or Hispanic people. Numbingly anachronistic, this option had a civil rights lawyer denounce it as a blatant violation of the Fair Housing Act of 1968. Although Facebook originally defended this practice, it said it would no longer allow advertisers of housing, employment, and credit-related products to target ethnic groups.

Though this practice stopped, the fact remains that ads play into people’s worst preconceptions and stereotypes of who their customers are and who’s interested in what, all in the name of making money.

These ads targeting ethnicity are still available outside these categories, and who you are, your friendships, and your beliefs are still being extracted and divvied up for advertisers. Ads, by nature, are only a service when they are consonant with the potential buyer, but it’s come to a point where this method is harmful. If an advertiser wants to address the largest market possible for a skateboard and spend the least amount of money possible, it will target only boys from ages 14–20 and potentially exclude a 40-year-old aunt who wants to buy her nephew a skateboard because the demographic is too small to buy into. This inflexible method, in its worst case, has the potential

Ted Davis

to devolve into discrimination and perpetuate harmful societal norms.

Taking this to the political realm, if you’re a Republican, you will only see advertisements and “sponsored content” that are congruent with your beliefs because you are more likely to click on it. Facebook wants to pursue its mission to make the world more connected and open, but how is that possible when its revenue is tied to something it can control: what people click on?

Ads are only one sample of content that embraces people’s already cemented beliefs. According to a BuzzFeed News analysis, in the last three months of the presidential campaign, the top 20 fake news stories on Facebook generated more engagement—shares, likes, and comments—than the top 20 stories from real news web-

sites. One such story came from a tweet that claimed protesters were paid to be anti-Trump in Austin, TX. Despite the Twitter user later proving that it was false, the original tweet had been retweeted and liked more than 5,000 times; articles about it were shared on Facebook more than 44,000 times. Fake news stories such as this one are so much stickier than the truth because people want to believe them.

They want to read what they already believed for self-verification, for continued resonance.

Instead of a site where all voices are heard, Facebook has become a site where the popular, but not necessarily true voice, is more heard.

It’s where people share that Obama was born in Kenya and that Pope Francis endorsed Donald Trump; even though these stories aren’t

true, they proliferate because the audience wants to believe them. Facebook has started to become an echo chamber, with both ads and fakes news allowing people to embrace prejudice and reject information that challenges them. It has made it harder for someone to be exposed to the world by instead showing the viewer ads pre-conceptually suited to their demographics and news, fake or not, supported by like-minded friends. Facebook is a chilling illustration of power, which Mark Zuckerberg himself has acknowledged as a tool that can be shaped to improve society, but nothing will happen if it is left as it is, with clicks accumulating and beliefs cementing.

Jasmine Wu is a second-year majoring in philosophy and economics.

Shut Down the Institute of Politics The IOP Churns Out Career Politicians, Continuing a Toxic Cycle in Washington

Maggie Loughran, Editor-in-Chief Forrest Sill, Editor-in-Chief Annie Cantara, Managing Editor The MAROON Editorial Board consists of the Editors-in-Chief and editors of THE MAROON.

NEWS

GREY CITY

Pete Grieve, editor Emily Kramer, editor Adam Thorp, editor Katie Akin, deputy editor Christine Schmidt, senior editor

Wendy Lee, editor Natalie Friedberg, senior editor

VIEWPOINTS

Cole Martin, editor Sarah Zimmerman, editor ARTS

MJ Chen, editor Evangeline Reid, editor

SOCIAL MEDIA

Jamie Ehrlich, editor Emily Harwell, senior editor ONLINE

Euirim Choi, editor Vishal Talasani, director of data analysis PHOTO

Zoe Kaiser, editor

SPORTS

VIDEO

Emmett Rosnebaum, editor Rhea Bhojwani, deputy editor Katie Anderson, senior editor Britta Nordstrom, senior editor

Stacey Reimann, senior editor

DESIGN

Stephanie Liu, production manager Kay Yang, head designer COPY

Sophie Downes, head editor Morganne Ramsey, head editor Erica Sun, head editor Katrina Lee, deputy editor Patrick Lou, deputy editor THIS ISSUE

Design Associates: Li Chen, Meena Kandallu, Peng-Peng Liu; Editors: Pia Ramos, Liz Xiong Copy: Meena Kandallu, Peng-Peng Liu, Olivia Shao

BUSINESS

Patrick Quinn, chief financial officer Jeanne Marie Fishkin, director of development Anjing Fu, director of marketing Sandra Lukac, director of marketing Ben Lanier, director of operations Audrey Mang, director of strategy Regina Filomeno, business manager Harry Backlund, distributor

Editor-in-Chief E-mail: Editor@ChicagoMaroon.com Newsroom Phone: (773) 702-1403 Business Phone: (773) 702-9555 Fax: (773) 702-3032 For advertising inquiries, please contact Ads@ChicagoMaroon.com or (773) 702-9555.

Circulation: 5,500. © 2016 THE CHICAGO MAROON Ida Noyes Hall / 1212 East 59th Street / Chicago, IL 60637

My argument in this article—that the Institute of Politics (IOP) does more harm than good and should be shut down—is sure to anger many people. Well, the truth hurts. This country has just catapulted into power a coterie of madmen whose policies and temperaments threaten all of our survival. There is no more time for hedging. I hope those of my peers who are involved with the IOP, instead of dismissing me outright, will look up from their spreadsheet of viable think tank internships and hear me out. Our future may well depend on it.

It is plainly true that no matter how many Reince Priebii get appointed to Trump’s inner circle, the “Washington Establishment” has been dealt a significant blow by this election. The distance and emptiness of the political class

and its disregard for the lives of the working people who make up the supermajority of this country’s population has never been clearer. The Trump supporters out in Hootenanny County may be racist, but they have a point: Washington is broken. It is full of people who do not care about us.

We must work to dismantle this class at the local level by cutting off its personnel supply.

The world does not need any more tank-thinkers or self-described “policy wonks” (those for whom FiveThirtyEight projections approached becoming a sexual fetish). It does not need another cadre of Fellows Ambassadors. It does not need any more 17-yearold Wall Street babies who show up during O-Week and learn how to shake hands and take selfies with war criminals, any more

moderates who lust for compromise in the legislatures and tweet gleefully about Hamilton while minority voting blocs in rural areas get gerrymandered out of existence. These people have gotten us nowhere and they will continue to get us nowhere, buzzing around in their insulated sixth-floor offices while women are jailed for underground abortions and entire cities are deported en masse, unless we cut off the source that produces them. This entails shutting down, tomorrow if at all possible, an institution that encourages and enables new drones to enter a career in politics and spend a lifetime getting paid to manufacture the illusion of progress and problem-solving— the Institute of Politics.

It’s not that I think everything Continued on page 7

7

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

“[The IOP] encourages and enables new drones to enter a career in politics and spend a lifetime getting paid to manufacture the illusion of progress and problem-solving” Continued from page 6

the IOP does is bad, just most of it. Money, God bless it, can be a powerful thing. There have been some amazing and brilliant speakers at the IOP, no doubt, but they also invite evil members of past Republican governments to talk about “the pressures of the job.” The IOP’s ongoing programs and committees provide a place for people interested in improving the world to congregate and share ideas, to be sure, but it is my belief that for the most part this results in optimistic young people getting their morals blasted out of them with the pile-driver of “politics.”

If they are lucky enough to resist pulverization by the “Off the Record” culture of the IOP, some of these young people may end up participating in or founding the few good programs that exist under the IOP umbrella, programs like the Leaders of Color program and the Women in Public Service Program, both of which have been

very important places for some of the bravest and most righteous people I have met at this school.

But these programs, I’m sorry to say, are exceptions to the rule, created by bright students and fostered by anomalous saints within the IOP’s ranks. They float along, undisturbed but disfavored, in the gulf stream of the IOP’s mainline activity, which is the production of the very same political nihilism that we are now finding has sold our country down the river.

If the problem with the University of Chicago is that it dumbly insists on avoiding “politics” in its institutional actions in deference to the authority of an obscure report that none of the administrators have even read, the problem with the Institute of Politics is that it is all politics and only politics. The principal arbiter of this view is, of course, chieftain David Axelrod, the title of whose memoir, Believer, belies the fact that he runs an institution that teaches undergradu-

ates to believe in nothing except the hollow virtues of “politics,” “discourse,” “debate,” and most insidiously, “compromise.” Reading Believer gives us a look into the mind of someone for whom politics really is a game played between two sides on an equal playing field, a deliberative and ultimately productive process.

It is this mentality that informs the incubator culture of the IOP, where even the most virulent of ideologies are welcome so long as they bring advice on how to get involved in “the world of politics.”

The reality, of course, is that “the world of politics” is actually a haywire plutocracy engineered without substantial safeguards against authoritarian rule, dominated by dark money, and staffed by “pragmatic” bootlickers whose ambition has eclipsed their morals. Surely the election of Donald Trump has brought some of this home, so that we no longer have to humor this political establishment—people like Liesl Hickey,

strategist for Jeb Bush’s super PAC and one of this quarter’s IOP Fellows—and can now get down to the business of changing the world.

Just imagine the “post-Trump IOP,” and that’ll tell you everything you need to know. Try reading Believer after the election, or go back and reread the M AROON article last winter wherein Axelrod defends Anita Alvarez’s right to not get protested at the IOP. His argument looks ridiculous now, and the rebuttal article by Stephanie Greene and Elizabeth Adetiba now seems all the more true. Deliberation, analysis, and “hearing out both sides” is no longer viable. Now that we are faced with a real crisis, we must take real action and dispense with all this sophistry, all these abstract notions of civility, which are just the Ivy League translations of the vulgar “give Trump a chance.”

By “real action” I mean donating money to the American Civil Liberties Union, to Standing Rock, and to Planned Parent-

hood; calling your representative incessantly; protesting obsessively; reading Masha Gessen; going to D.C. and fl ipping cars when Trump walks away from the Paris climate agreement; attacking racists when you see them harassing people in the supermarket—whatever it takes.

Only through a concerted, collective, and unfl inching refusal to compromise, no matter how much clout and how many think tank internships it costs us, will we be able to fend off autocracy and protect the future of our planet. A sensible place for the University to begin in this regard would be to shut down this campus’s greatest factory of ambition and compromise, the Institute of Politics, and replace it with a center for the study of Antonio Gramsci, or a second Office of Multicultural Student Affairs, or maybe just a good old homeless shelter.

Jake Bittle is a fourth-year in the College majoring in English.

I’m #WithHim To Reject the President-Elect Is to Reject Democracy

BY LENA BREDA MAROON CONTRIBUTOR

In the weeks following the election, I was left disappointed and disenchanted. On November 8, what began as a night of ironies, comically exaggerated moans of anxiety, and bowls of “stress-eating” mac and cheese dramatically transformed as an unstoppable hush grew across our unceasingly surprising country. Watching the outcome become more and more clear, many members of my house grew numb and mute, no longer amused by hypothetical imaginations of the election’s results, and the mac and cheese lay uneaten, congealed in red and blue paper bowls scattered across our Resident Heads’ apartment.

Huddled in the barren gut of campus, we gathered on the quad, shivering in the cold as we screamed into the air during an event meant to comically express our “primal” rage over an election that couldn’t have—shouldn’t have—ended up this way. “Taps” buzzing in the air, students raised their fists and cheered as mementos of Trump’s campaign were burned, the smell of burnt plastic in the air.

After that night, strangers and friends, many of whom had only expressed lukewarm approval of Clinton’s candidacy, posted rejections of Trump’s election, the hashtag #NotMyPresident rippling across social media. “#StillWithHer!” my friends echoed, posting pictures of teary faces, Ameri-

can flags, or—most frequently— half-empty liquor bottles while declaring their refusal to accept Trump’s future presidency.

However, after the events of the last several weeks, I have realized that what our country needs more than anything is to be #WithHim. As a child, I never gave a thought to our American democracy. Although the United States government is relatively young, I and many others have treated our political system like a bloated bellyache after Thanksgiving: predictable, constant, and fun to complain about. I never doubted the political stability of my country, and I never needed to. I had the privilege of complaining about the “corruption” of American politics while also living in the comfortable position of knowing that my family’s safety was protected.

The stable presence of the U.S. government led to my and many others’ overly trusting view of politics. We don’t realize that everything and anything can happen in politics, because we have been so coddled by the United States’ dependability. I—and every other United States citizen—have never had the experience of living in a country where our safety was in peril due to our crumbling government. Messy and muddy and mucky as it is, our government has never been so fractured as to dissolve into full-fledged anarchy.

We are in a “make-or-break” moment for our political system.

In times of civil division and political unrest, much like the at-

mosphere today, we have seen countries erupt into disarray and violence: Kenya, South Africa, Thailand, Egypt. It has happened in other countries and it could very well happen today and to us.

When Trump threatened to reject the results of the election should Clinton win, The New York Times published an article stating that this is the type of rhetoric that has created rifts in the necessary trust between a government and its citizens—and led to many countries’ downfall. Although the United States government has been an omnipresent force in many Americans’ lives, this is not a given. We can have no sense of certainty that we are in any way safe from being thrust into a nationwide state of chaos should our government collapse.

I need not go into unnecessary detail about the chaos and bloodshed that follow these political collapses, but let me remind you of the death tolls that accompany the destruction of a government with the formation of rebel groups and uncontrollable protests. Imagine the mass destruction that we have witnessed in smaller countries taking place in the United States of America, arguably the most powerful country on Earth with one of the world’s largest populations. The destruction of the U.S. government would be a disaster of unimaginable proportions.

Rejecting the results of this election could have a much larger and threatening impact than we realize now. Rejecting the outcome

of the election—a properly-conducted election that resulted in the legal election of a leader agreed upon by the Electoral College and a large portion of the United States population—means undermining the strength of our political system and placing our political system in jeopardy.

This is not to condemn protest as a means of political expression.

Some of America’s greatest accomplishments have come from peaceful protest, and citizens’ ability to criticize their government is one of the United States’ most formidable strengths. However, there is a large difference between protest and a rejection of a legitimate election. While one expresses disapproval of an unjust action, the other is an aggressive and dangerous act of rebellion against the agreed-upon structures of government. To those who say Trump is a tyrant who will have horrendous effects on our government, I concede. He is a dangerous, narcissistic despot, but he was elected rightfully by our country, so therefore we must respect the results. To those who claim that the Electoral College is an inaccurate method of representing the desires of the American people: Call for structural change, but do not refuse to accept the legal election of a man who was technically elected according to the current laws of our country. Rejecting his election licenses others to reject the outcome of other elections, creating a dangerous slope of political disobedience.

Our democracy’s well-being is the most crucial treasure we have as Americans. It is a miraculously mundane familiarity that I could sit with my friends, eating breakfast following the night of a contentious election. Though commonly overlooked, we must remember what is at stake should our government fall. Claims like #NotMyPresident are much more than mere attempts to gain Instagram likes or expressions of political disapproval—they threaten the very core of our safety as a country. In this incredibly important period, what we need to do as citizens is accept the results of a successful election for fear of what is at stake should we reject it. The sad truth is that Trump was legitimately elected, and therefore he must become the legitimate president of the United States. He should become president because it is what the American people decided according to the long-established laws of our country. The moment we begin rejecting the legal election of political leaders is the moment that the first crack in American trust in our political system arises. Rather than looking to the past and dangerously refusing to accept the results of a legal election, we must look to the future and how we can preserve the peace of our country while creating change. For the sake of our country, our democracy, and the future of our government, we must be #WithHim. Lena Breda is a first-year in the College.

8

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

ARTS

uchicago MANUAL OF

STYLE

by jessica hwang

Chloe Sun / second-year My name is Chloe Sun. I’m an Economics and Psychology major from Shanghai. I’m also a member of Psi Chi, the psychology club.

“I try to only buy things that I wear often.”

Most of the time, I would say that practicality determines a purchase more than popularity or brand name. I might get obsessed with a super popular piece—then I’d calm myself down by considering if I actually like it or if it’s just hype. And because I try to only buy things that I wear often, struggling with including these pieces in my everyday wear rarely happens.

Chloe is wearing a Sweater by J. W. Ander s on a nd je a n s

by Cur rent / Elliot.

It’s hard for me to describe my style.

My close friends seem to know me better than myself because they would always pick out things in a store and say, “This looks like what you would wear.”

I like bright colors in general. Even when I’m wearing monochrome or earth tones, I like to add color with accessories. In terms of textures, I like the look of suede, leather, and velvet—they can add effects like matte or shine to the outfit. Velvet and pajama-style pieces have been really popular this year. It’s hard to wear these elements in Chicago, though, since the weather is so cold!

Chiara Ferragni is definitely one of my favorite style bloggers. She’s really adventurous with her outfits and often surprises me by pulling off something that I wouldn’t consider pretty at first. There was a pair of strappy sandals by Chloé that I thought was ugly at first when I saw them elsewhere—but then she put together an outfit so well with them! I decided to get those when I found a deal on Farfetch.

There are also a lot of Asian brands I like: For example, W Concept is a Korean website that sells exclusively clothing and accessories designed in Korea.

I also recently found a Japanese brand

I approach buying new pieces by looking at what I currently have in my closet. For the winter, I like to collect oversized sweaters in plain colors and color block, jeans in different shades of blue, and coats and jackChloe is wearing a coat by AllSaints. ets also either in plain colors or color block.

I think it reflects my personality of being simple and straightforward. I like fast-fashion brands like Zara because they provide very up-to-date pieces at reasonable prices. They’re so good at picking up the hottest trends and incorporating those elements into accessible pieces for everyone, not just supermodels on a runway. And since it’s reasonably priced and constantly updated, I feel less guilty when I update my closet from time to time.

At the same time, I would recommend shoes or bags from luxury brands—not very often, though! These items last longer than clothes and can be worn a lot more often than a statement piece. However, high-end doesn’t always imply high quality, which is something I consider before I make a big investment.

And I think it’s really important that I feel physically comfortable in a piece of clothing.

Sometimes big brand names make extravagant things that are uncomfortable, or they get lazy and just stamp their logo on really uncomfortable and unimaginative things.

They’re definitely not worth the price tag.

“High-end doesn’t always imply high quality.”

Chloe is wearing a sweater by Zara, a tank by Zara, jeans by J Brand, shoes by Stuart Weitzman, and a bag by Simon Miller.

9

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

Different Quatrains: Steve Reich Birthday Celebration

BY CHRISTOPHER GOOD MAROON CONTRIBUTOR

The notion that anyone might “need no introduction” is a cliché at this point, but if it’s true for anyone, then it’s true for New York composer Steve Reich, one of the most celebrated figures in modern classical music. In honor of Reich’s 80th birthday, the Chicago Symphony Orchestra’s MusicNOW program curated a performance of three of his works at the Harris Theater for Music and Dance.

This birthday party functioned as both a retrospective and an introduction—to paraphrase DJ Shadow, one of many musicians indebted to Reich, an endtroduction of sorts.

Although MusicNOW’s selections— Different Trains (1988), Proverb (1995), and Double Sextet (2007)—spanned three decades, they brought one of Reich’s most unique qualities into clear focus.

At his best, Reich is as much a conceptualist as a musician: His compositions don’t just refer to the external world, but are actually built from and upon it.

In the case of Different Trains, the meaning is inseparable from the medium.

When the string quartet took the stage, it played in synchrony with a backing track, with sounds that were present and musicians who were absent. Now among Reich’s most highly regarded works, Trains is known for its paratext as much as its actual music; it was inspired by Reich’s realization that the trains that carted him on childhood trips between his divorced parents recalled the trains that ferried the victims of the Holocaust across Europe.

Here, as elsewhere, the concept is not a launching point (i.e., something to be departed from) but a causeway. Reich conducted interviews with his former governess, a Pullman porter, and a series of Holocaust survivors. From these fragments, he extrapolated entire harmonies and melodies, with the violin mimicking the lilt of spoken word and the viola pantomiming the clatter of the railroad.

This conceptual beauty did not prevent Different Trains from being the evening’s weakest performance. At times, the live musicians were simply outshone by their pre-recorded counterparts. Still, the effect of Trains was no less powerful. As the sampled speech was looped and coiled, there was a sort of semantic satiation taking place: The words repeated until they ceased to be intelligible as

Courtesy of Carolyn Cole

Steve Reich has turned 80, and the CSO just had to celebrate.

words. In other words, they became music.

Proverb was also constructed with words, in this case a passage in Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Culture and Value: “How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life.”

The line is sung in rounds and set to the pipe organum, subjected to tonal shifts (à la Perótin) and spun about anew. The effect is haunting; like a feedback loop, the mantra compounds in intensity with each repetition.

With its gauzy overtones and coloratura backed only by a persistent marimba, Proverb is an unusually minimalist work from a composer already known for his minimalism. And yet I found it to be the evening’s high water mark: The somber understatement of the plainsong proved a perfect fit for the ensemble, which included musicians from the Northwestern University Contemporary Music Ensemble.

At this point, it also feels necessary

to commend the conductor, Alan Pierson. As the director of the orchestral group Alarm Will Sound, Pierson has collaborated with Dirty Projectors and recorded an entire album of Aphex Twin covers. In other words, he has his modernist bona fides. But it’s thanks to the fact that Pierson has worked closely with Reich himself that he was equipped to conduct in such a compelling fashion.

Between its chipper piano punches and its frenetic pace, Double Sextet, the final piece, immediately scans as a late-era Reich piece. But what sets Double Sextet apart as it walks its catenary catwalk—fast, slow, fast—is evidenced by its name. The composition requires two sets of six musicians, and the real beauty comes from the imperfections of this mirroring: the two sextets weave and overlap like a moiré pattern.

Double Sextet made for a fitting clos-

er, but was followed by some other treats, as the audience was invited to complimentary pizza, drinks, and posters while Reich’s 1968 work Pendulum Music—four microphones swinging over four speakers—was performed in the lobby. With all the pearl-clutching worries about the death of classical music still in the air, it was heartening to see the event not only well attended, but well enjoyed.

After all, Reich never paid much regard to notions of high and low art—his most powerful moments breach that divide, such as his use of sampling or contemporary influences, notably on 2012’s Radiohead-inspired Radio Rewrite. It’s for this reason that eating pizza after a day at the symphony made sense—after all, it was a birthday party! So here’s to Mr. Reich’s health, and here’s to hoping for more of the same (that is, more of the different).

When Life Gives You Potatoes, Make an Opera

BY NICK OGILVIE MAROON CONTRIBUTOR

The iconic imagery, fantasy, and saccharine-sweet tone of the 1950 Disney adaptation of Cinderella has made its way into the collective subconscious of the Western world. So what is the audience of the world premiere of The Hypocrites’ Cinderella at the Theater of Potatoes to think when, even before the fi rst act begins, it is triumphantly announced that this adaptation has no magic, no romance, and no prince?

Certainly, this isn’t the Cinderella the audience may think they know. This adaption is more closely inspired by Cendrillon, the French operatic adaptation

by Pauline Viardot-García. From the moment audience members walk into the theater, it is clear that something very different is in store. Facing an imposing stage design that features walkways radiating out from the central stage, viewers are wrapped into the theater’s post-modern presentation. Surfaces are draped in hyper-saturated pastels, vari-

ous instruments populate the stage, and there’s f loral print, well, everywhere.

Set as a play within a play, in some kind of almost purgatorial waiting room, various feminist icons gather at a restaurant and theater—including Fanny Mendelssohn (Dana Omar), George Sand (Gay Glenn), and even the aforementioned Viardot-García herself (Leslie Ann Sheppard). In this titular theater of potatoes, they gather to talk, think, and (of course) put on plays to pass the time while the potato stew is cooking. Tonight’s menu is Pauline’s new version of Cinderella: The cook (Amanda Martinez) is quickly elevated to the leading role because of her innate operatic soprano, and off the production goes in its self-aware, post-modern, genre-and-time-bending way; think Noises Off crossed with a PG-13 version of Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland.

This production is reimagined for a modern-day audience by featuring the increasingly relevant social message of equal love and opportunity for all.

Cinderella is transformed from some-

one who relies on magic and fortune to marry a prince—the now-iconic symbol of the old generation and patriarchy— to someone who escapes social repression to independently claim a role she deserves through hard work and individual talent. The composer (also Dana Omar) stumbles upon her perfect soprano by choosing to interview everyone without judgment, the step-sisters (Aja Wiltshire and Elle Walker) concede that Cinderella deserves better because she is kinder than they are, the Baron has an epiphany and turns himself in to jail for child abuse, applause, curtain call.

Cinderella at the Theater of Potatoes may not be the traditional narrative of the fairy tale from which it takes its name, but it still presents people transcending the social realities they face.

The difference, though, is that this adaptation cannot escape the dark reality that surrounds its social message. While the original presented a fantasy, this adaptation offers a dream of reality that seems almost as far away as the fairy godmother in today’s modern socio-political climate.

That being said, there are enough cultural stepping stones within the production to keep us very much in the world of Cinderella. Within an unfamiliar and strange world, familiar but abstract elements of the traditional Cinderella tale seep through: the mean step-sisters, the parental ball-and-chain (Joel Rodriguez), and the promise of redemption in a world of darkness. The players may be singing, dancing, and generally treating the fourth wall like it’s some kind of stuffy formality, but at the core of this bubbling, vibrant production, the generations-old story of redemption from repression sings strong.

This presentation of Cinderella is no fairy tale; it’s the laugh track to modern social injustices, a post-modern and modern-minded reinterpretation of the past, and above all a rallying cry for a more equal and loving future.

Cinderella at the Theater of Pot at o e s i s r unn in g thr o u gh Ja nu a r y 8 th a t T h e D e n T h e a t r e’s Heath Main Stage. Tickets are $36.

10

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

Yoko Ono Sculpture Lands in Jackson Park

BY EVANGELINE REID ARTS EDITOR

This fall Yoko Ono installed her first permanent public art piece in America, “Sky Landing,” on Wooded Island in Jackson Park.

Her sculpture is one piece of a larger project to restore the island, organized by the non-profit Project 120 and the Chicago Park District. The Army Corps of Engineers have invested $8.1 million into the island.

The sculpture is created from flame or petal like shapes—curled, curved, and pointed—and sloping mounds of earth.

It sits just outside the also newly renovated Garden of the Phoenix. The garden dates back to the World’s Columbian Exposition in 1893, and was built by Japanese tradesmen unlike most of the Exposition’s pieces about other cultures.

As a Japanese citizen, Ono was a particularly fitting artist to update the park.

The park is worth a visit, and the sculpture itself is best encountered in person.

Walk between the petals. Stand on the ridges of earth. Then meander through the Garden of the Pheonix and gaze at the Museum of Science and Indsitry accross a bay. It’s a small escape, just steps away from the bustling street.

“Sky Landing” was added to the newly renovated Wooded Island, just outside the Japanese-style Garden of the Phoenix.

Evangeline Reid

EXHIBIT [A]rts [11/30] WEDNESDAY 8:15 –9:15 p.m. Listen to Make a Joyful Noise (MaJN) channel Christmas spirit through a cappella. There will be free insomnia cookies and hot chocolate! L ogan Penthouse. F ree.

7:30 p.m. Contempo Concert Series continues to explore contemporary classical music in its 52nd season with “Interplay”, a concert featuring the Talea Ensemble. There will be a pre-concert lecture by Assistant Professor of Music Seth Brodsky at 6:30 p.m. Logan Performance Hall. $5 for students.

[12/1] THURSDAY [12/3] SATURDAY 4 – 6 p.m. Celebrate the launch of Miriam’s Cafe (in honor of Miriam Graham) at the Smart Museum with free food, a latte art competition, and live jazz, baroque music, and coffee and tea! Smart Museum. Free.

8:00 p.m. Hear violinist and recipient of 2016 Avery Fisher Career Grant Alexi Kenney perform Samuel Barber’s Violin Concerto with the USO at their last concert of the quarter. Mandel Hall. Suggested Donation: $10 general / $5 students.

7:30 p.m. See the complex threads of justice unravel as Shakespeare returns to Theater West with Seph Mozes’s adaptation of Merchant of Venice [check Facebook event page for content warning details]. Theater West, Logan Center.

Free on Thursday, $6 for following shows. .

7:30 –11:00 p.m. Join the Chicago Swing Dance Society for a holiday-themed dance, complete with a November birthday jam and snowball! There will be a beginner lesson from 7:30 - 8:30 p.m., followed by open dancing. Ida Noyes. Free.

[12/2] FRIDAY

[12/4] SUNDAY

7:00 –9 p.m. Tell your best jokes, perform a poem, sing a song, or debut a new s k i l l at t he I-Hou s e O p en M ic n i g ht! I-H o u s e . F re e .

3:00 –5:00 p.m. Usher in the holidays, surround-sound style, as JeriLou Zike leads the Rockefeller Chapel Choir, Motet Choir, Chicago Men’s a Cappella and Haymarket Opera Orchestra in the annual performance of Handel’s Messiah. Rockefeller Memorial Chapel. $25-50 general / $5 Students.

8:00–9 p.m. Come laugh to absurdist humor and absolutely no political jokes (a welcome reprieve after Thanksgiving dinner) with Occam’s Razor.

FX K Theater, Reynolds Club. Free.

11

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

uchicago MANUAL OF

STYLE

Christopher Good / second-year My name is Christopher! I’m hoping to major in Fundamentals and Art History. I write for the South Side Weekly, and DJ at WHPK, among other things.

“There’s rarely any necessity to what you wear.”

I’ll take this opportunity to say that I find i-D [a fashion magazine in the Vice empire] to be incredibly lazy. If there’s a redeeming quality, it’s that they’ve scared me off writing all my sentences exclusively in lowercase. Hopefully that doesn’t sound too bitter! —Christopher

The great axiomatic rule of fashion, as I’ve always been told, is that you wear your clothes and not the other way around. Which is nonsense to me. I am often very tired and disinterested in speaking with people, so it’s all the better if my clothes can pull my weight.

Well, that’s a bit of a joke, but I do like the idea.

As I understand it, clothing in general tends either toward the superfluous (think denim with multiple lifetime warranties) or the vestigial (fake epaulettes and sewn-up rental tuxedo pockets). There’s rarely any necessity to what you wear. Which, of course, means you can wear what you want! I don’t think you should have to explain yourself for wearing a scarf when it’s not cold, for example.

So, no, I don’t believe I’ve arrived at a cohesive style yet. It’s great fun not having anything set in stone, though! I’m alright with my outfits contradicting one another, since I contradict myself in more important ways all the time. Still, there are certainly some things I try for and some I don’t. I really love wool pants, loud T-shirts, and long coats. For some reason, I never wear olive green or canvas, and I avoid denim—just never really feel it.

I really like mixing different odds and ends that don’t quite match up: suit pants with a t-shirt, running shoes with a button-up, and the like. I think dressing subtly off-kilter—as in this outfit, which plays light wool against dark herringbone, and that with some sneakers, which remind me of Neon Genesis Evangelion—is a fun way to make sure you’re not taking yourself too seriously.

I think what passes for genuine or sincere in fashion is inherently pretty reactionary; it tends to just be a hodgepodge of symbols from yesteryear. And these retrograde symbols— which are tied up in our parents’ counterculture, not ours—are powerless under late capitalism.

I don’t think this should come as news to anyone. A sleeve tattoo might have gotten you kicked out of the country club a few decades back, but now you can sit in the boardroom and cover it with a French cuff. So I think this is why I find nostalgic leanings in fashion to be off-putting.

But by this point, I’m pretty burnt out on minimalism as well. There are too many interesting things in the world for me to focus on saying less! So I’m just trying to figure out my vocabulary. And that’s the nice thing about clothing. You get to read as much into it as you want!

As an aside, I think I would be delighted if I managed to pull together an outfit with absolutely no sex appeal. Or in other words, I would hate to find myself dressing to please other people. The closest I’ve gotten to total fashion ego death was actually my signature look for a while: a pair of turquoise Bermuda shorts emblazoned with many sleepy Garfields.

It might be played out to say that I’m inspired by the French New Wave, but it’s just true—I like wool suits and coats. For that matter, I’m also really fond of the outfits King Krule wears.

Archy is just really good at looking effortless in outfits that probably took plenty of effort. But I think the team I admire most is Arca and Jesse Kanda, who remain a good two decades ahead of the rest of us. That’s me speaking more broadly about art than about fashion—I doubt I’d be able to pull off Arca’s 12-inch heels and polyethylene booty shorts, anyhow—but it’s certainly new.

Christopher is wearing a coat by APC, pants

by John Lawrence Sullivan, and shoes

by Our Legacy.

I’ve always understood authenticity to mean dressing as who you are: wearing yourClose-up of Christopher’s shirt, by Patrik self on your sleeve. And on some level, that Ervell. doesn’t appeal to me. Behaving in a genuine way seems to mean behaving the same in all scenarios and circumstances, but the truth is that I code-switch a lot. And I think there’s a parallel between that aspect of my personality and the fact that I’m comfortable dressing like a geriatric one day and a millennial the next.

by jessica hwang

“I would be delighted to pull together an outfit with no sex appeal.”

12

THE CHICAGO MAROON - NOVEMBER 29, 2016

SPORTS IN-QUOTES... “By my calculations a simple solution to do telekinesis is develop a low grade two way mental force field and just control repel and attract.” —All-star outfielder Jose Canseco

South Siders in Final Four Against No. 5 WOMEN’S SOCCER

BY MIRANDA BURT SPORTS STAFF

The No. 11 Maroons will travel to Salem, VA this Wednesday in preparation for their upcoming Final Four matchup with the No. 5 Messiah Falcons on Friday.

The squad is the last fall sports team still playing, and it is riding high after taking down two ranked opponents in the NCAA DIII tournament thus far. The Maroons almost saw their season end last Sunday in the Elite Eight, but a clutch goal by fi rst-year midfielder Hanna Watkins with just minutes left in regulation to tie the score at 1–1 took the game to double overtime and penalty kicks, where Chicago clinched a Final Four berth.

“I’m extremely proud of the team for making it this far,” Watkins said. “The final goal was a result of all the work and plays beforehand. We were building up to it.”

The South Siders (18–3–1) will face a tough test in the Falcons (21–2–0), who have outscored their opponents 13–1 in the NCAA tournament. Their narrowest margin of victory was a 2–0 win in their second round game. They are also riding a 19-game win streak into the Final Four matchup. This will be a tough pairing for the Maroons’ defense and first-year goal-

keeper Katie Donovan, who has nine shutouts on the season.

The Maroons, however, have some momentum of their own. After dropping two consecutive conference matchups to Carnegie Mellon and Wash U to conclude the regular season, they have won four straight in the NCAA tournament by a combined margin of 12–2. In addition to knocking off No. 18 ranked Pomona-Pitzer, Chicago also took down No. 3 Thomas More in the Sweet Sixteen. The Maroons have also had almost an entire two weeks to prepare for their Final Four matchup with the Falcons.

“We are spending this week training hard and mentally preparing. We are very excited for Friday,” Watkins said. “We have worked so hard for this moment, and I cannot wait to see what we do in Virginia.”

If the South Siders pull out the victory Friday, they will face a familiar opponent Saturday for a shot at a national championship. UAA opponents Wash U and Brandeis are battling it out on the other side of the bracket for a trip to the national championship. The Wash U Bears pulled out a 1–0 win in St. Louis against Chicago on the last day of the regular season.

The Maroons faced off against Brandeis at home, beating the No. 8 Judges 2–1 on

University of Chicago Athletics

Third-year defender Whitley Cargile throws the ball in to her teammate.

October 14.

The Judges (16–3–2) have played one overtime and one double overtime contest in the NCAA tournament, scraping by to the Final Four by a combined 9–4 score.

They turned around a slide at the end of the regular season that saw them go

1–3–2 over their final six games.

The Bears (17–2–3) have had a much smoother ride into the Final Four. They have won their tournament games with a combined 7–0, with one contest going into penalty kicks. Wash U finished the regular season 7–0–1 over their final eight games.

Maroons Return Home Unbeaten WOMEN’S BASKETBALL

BY MAGGIE O’HARA SPORTS STAFF

Over the Thanksgiving break, the Maroons kept the ball rolling, topping both Carroll University and Carthage College.

The Maroons opened up play in their home court with a decisive 83–38 victory over Carroll. All 13 players contributed to the win with everyone playing at least 10 minutes. Highlighted was an impressive outing by fi rst-year Miranda Burt, who led all point scorers with 17.

She shot an impressive .889 field goal percentage and collected five steals.

The second game of the week proved

to be a bit more challenging, featuring an overtime win over Carthage. The Maroons looked dominating going into halftime with a score of 28 –19,0 but Carthage struck back immediately, cutting the lead to four. The story of the rest of the game was scoring in clumps: The Maroons jumped to their biggest lead at 65–48 with seven minutes to go before Carthage caught fi re again, rallying on a 21–2 run down the stretch, taking their fi rst lead of the game at 67–69.

The final 30 seconds of the game featured a crucial offensive rebound by third-year Elizabeth Nye and a subsequently fouled fourth-year Britta Nordstrom who made both free throws to tie

the game and force an overtime. Nordstrom continued to dominate in overtime: She ended tied for the team lead with 20 points.

Defeating Carthage was a huge win for the Maroons as they had lost to them in the previous four seasons. The tenacity of this team showed strong in their ability to eke out a win. Fourthyear Stephanie Anderson noted how big this win was, saying, “It was great to beat Carthage finally because we never have, especially after they took a 20-point lead away from us last year.

When they came back you could see that the returners on the team start to worry about a repeat comeback but it was

great to see everyone lift their heads up and refuse to let that happen again, which speaks to the difference in the team this year.”

The Maroons will next see action at home on Wednesday against No. 21 Wheaton College. Wheaton leads the all-time meetings 16 –14 against the Maroons dating back to the 1975 –76 season. “Wheaton’s supposed to be an even better team than Carthage so I’m excited to keep proving how good we actually are by matching up with better and better teams,” Anderson said.

Catch the Maroons in action at home on Wednesday at 6 p.m. in the Ratner Athletics Center.

Home Court Proves Advantageous for Chicago MEN’S BASKETBALL

BY CAVELL MEANS SPORTS STAFF

The South Siders came out on top in both of their games over the holiday weekend, defeating Carroll 94 –83 on Saturday and DePauw 78 –56 on Sunday. Both games were part of the fourteam UChicago Tournament, which took place at Ratner Athletics Center. The Maroons are now preparing to face off against Wheaton College on Wednesday.

The fi rst game was a closely fought battle, which started with Carroll creating a seven-point lead in the fi rst half.

However, Chicago’s starting lineup clawed its way back and tied the game at 19, thanks to five straight points from fourth-year forward Blaine Crawford.

Bolstered by second-year Noah Karras, the Maroons took a 41–37 lead into the second half.

The second half was even closer, with several lead changes. Fourth-year forward Waller Perez stepped up, scoring 20 points through layups and spot-up shots. With eight minutes left, the Maroons led 68–66 and then put their feet on the gas, going on a 22–9 run that sealed the game. Perez ended the game leading the team with 24 points, while Karras set a career-high with 22 points, and Crawford had a double-double with 23 points and 12 rebounds. The starting lineup contributed a whopping 90 out of 93 points.

Despite an eventual blowout, the second game saw an incredibly close fi rst

half. After Chicago opened with a 28–19 this weekend, so to be able to come up lead, DePauw pushed back to go into the with two wins is huge for us,” Baum said. second half trailing 35 –34. First half “I think we have a lot of confidence on standouts were Perez and Crawford, both ends of the court right now, which with 11 and 10 points, respectively. The will definitely help us heading into second half opened the game up, due to Wednesday.”

Wheaton should be a tough matcha much-improved Chicago offense that hit its fi rst six out of seven shots. Kar- up, as it is 3–1 with a lone loss coming ras shook off a slow start to drop eight against No. 2 Benedictine by a margin points, including two three-pointers. of just 10 points. Wheaton is on a threeAs the lead kept growing, DePauw was game win streak heading into the game.

However, the last time W heaton powerless to stop it, and the bench was cleared en route to the 22-point victory. and Chicago faced off was in December, Blaine Crawford was named tournament when the Maroons walked away with a MVP, and Waller Perez was named to decisive 25 point victory, winning 77–52.

The team looks to replicate that success the All-Tournament Team.

Overall, first-year guard Jordan essentially a year later. The game is a Baum was very happy with his team’s ef- home game and will begin at 8 p.m. on forts. “We played two really good teams Wednesday at Ratner Athletics Center.