National Guidelines for Digital Modelling
DR GUILLERMO ARANDA-MENA THE PPP CLUB - LECTURE SERIES 2012
15 MARCH 2012
The project participants
Industry
Government
Research
Construction Innovation also wishes to thank and acknowledge Colleen Foelz (Construction Innovation and edenink) for managing the production of this publication, as well as Sue Ferguson (itzdesign) and Gail Cartwright (wordwright) for their design and editing respectively.
DR GUILLERMO ARANDA-MENA THE PPP CLUB - LECTURE SERIES 2012
15 MARCH 2012
National Guidelines for Digital Modelling
Our thanks go to all those who attended and contributed to the success of this publication through their participation in the workshops held in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth.
ix
Foreword These National Guidelines and Case Studies for Digital Modelling are the outcomes from one of a number of Building Information Modelling (BIM)-related projects undertaken by the CRC for Construction Innovation. Since the CRC opened its doors in 2001, the industry has seen a rapid increase in interest in BIM, and widening adoption. These guidelines and case studies are thus very timely, as the industry moves to model-based working and starts to share models in a new context called integrated practice. Governments, both federal and state, and in New Zealand are starting to outline the role they might take, so that in contrast to the adoption of 2D CAD in the early 90s, we ensure that a national, industry-wide benefit results from this new paradigm of working. Section 1 of the guidelines give us an overview of BIM: how it affects our current mode of working, what we need to do to move to fully collaborative model-based facility development. The role of open standards such as IFC is described as a mechanism to support new processes, and make the extensive design and construction information available to asset operators and managers. Digital collaboration modes, types of models, levels of detail, object properties and model management complete this section. It will be relevant for owners, managers and project leaders as well as direct users of BIM. Section 2 provides recommendations and guides for key areas of model creation and development, and the move to simulation and performance measurement. These are the more practical parts of the guidelines developed for design professionals, BIM managers, technical staff and ‘in the field’ workers. The guidelines are supported by six case studies including a summary of lessons learnt about implementing BIM in Australian building projects. A key aspect of these publications is the identification of a number of important industry actions: the need for BIM-compatible product information and a national context for classifying product data; the need for an industry agreement and setting process-for-process definition; and finally, the need to ensure a national standard for sharing data between all of the participants in the facility-development process.
buildingSMART International Alliance for Interoperability
David Parken CEO, Australian Institute of Architects
National Guidelines for Digital Modelling
John Mitchell Chairman, buildingSMART Australasia
iii
Acknowledgments The CRC for Construction Innovation provided the major funding, industry research leadership and coordinated the development of National Guidelines for Digital Modelling and accompanying Case Studies. The Construction Innovation project team members are: Project Leader Tom Fussell (Project Services Queensland Department of Housing and Works) Project Manager National Digital Modelling Guidelines — Scott Beazley (QUT) Project Manager Case Studies — Guillermo Aranda-Mena (RMIT University) Researchers: Guillermo Aranda-Mena, Agustin Chevez, John Crawford, Bilal Succar (RMIT University) John Hainsworth —Arup Australasia Simon Hardy — Bovis Lend Lease Shane McAtee, Garry McCann, Richard Rizzalli — Mirvac Paul Akhurst , Chris Linning — Sydney Opera House David Marchant — Woods Bagot Joyce Law, Phillip Lord, Dean Morse — Brisbane City Council Paul Crapper — Building Commission John Spathonis — Qld Dept of Main Roads Scott Beazley, Robin Drogemuller, Stephan Gard, David Nielsen — Queensland University of Technology Guillermo Aranda-Mena, Ron Wakefield — RMIT
National Guidelines for Digital Modelling
Integrated Digital Modelling Taskforce
viii
Chair: Andrew Gutteridge (AIA) Representatives from the following organisations served on the taskforce. Association of Consulting Engineers Australia Australian Institute of Architects Australian Institute of Building Australian Institute of Quantity Surveyors BuildingSMART Australasia Facility Management Association of Australia
THE BUSINESS VALUE OF BIM Getting Building Information Modeling to the Bottom Line
Corporate Contributor Sponsors
Association Premier Partners
Government Premier Partner
Premier Corporate Partner
Table of Contents Introduction SmartMarket Report Executive Summary .........................4 Overall Value of BIM .....................................................................6 Case Study: Research 2........................................................................10 Industry Issue: Impact of BIM on Productivity..................................12 Industry Issue: Return on Investment in BIM ....................................13
Internal Business Value of BIM ............................................14 Industry Issue: Impact of BIM on Marketing.....................................18 Case Study: Texas A&M Health Science Center.............................19
Project Value of BIM...................................................................20 Case Study: Sutter Health Medical Center ......................................24 Industry Issue: BIM and Green Building............................................26 Case Study: Virtual Mock-Ups .............................................................27
Player Value of BIM.....................................................................28 Software Industry Perspective .............................................................35
Adoption of BIM............................................................................36 Case Study: Department of Energy ....................................................43 Industry Issue: Opportunities and Obstacles for Engineers .........44 Case Study: BIM on Heavy Civil Projects.........................................46
Conclusions.....................................................................................48 Images courtesy of Mortenson Construction
Resources ........................................................................................50 Methodology ...................................................................................50
Cover images provided by Bryan Christie Design
3
SmartMarket Report Executive Summary Reaping Higher Returns During Lean Times Even as the design and construction industry confronts a down economy, most BIM users are seeing positive payback from their use of the technology, according to McGraw-Hill Construction research. Users gain bankable benefits that enhance productivity, improve their ability to integrate teams and give them an edge on the competition. The value from BIM grows as users gain experience, offering them an opportunity to reap greater returns even during an economic recession. Key Findings ■ Two-thirds of BIM users say they see positive ROI on their overall investment in BIM. ■ 87% of expert users are experiencing positive ROI with BIM. ■ 93% of BIM users believe there is potential to gain more value from BIM in the future.
Better Than Expected Value
Competitive Advantage
Improved Productivity
Return on investment can be calculated in various ways, but those who take a data-driven approach see more upside to BIM. Users who formally measure their ROI report better returns than those who estimate ROI based on perception.
BIM is seen as a way to get a leg up on the competition. This is particularly true among less experienced users who are promoting a new service.
■ Seven in ten BIM users who
■ Half of users say offering new
BIM creates efficiencies. Users realize some of the greatest value of BIM through its potential to cut down on rework, such as rekeying information into models or making changes in the field. As users become more proficient, the opportunities to improve productivity are more pronounced.
■ Marketing new business to new
clients is the top rated business benefit of BIM.
measure ROI see positive returns, compared to half of those who only go by their perception of value.
services with BIM is a significant business benefit. ■ Two-thirds of users say BIM’s ability
to help a company maintain repeat business with past clients brings at least a moderate level of value.
■ One in five BIM users who meas-
ure ROI see returns greater than 50%—double the perceived value.
Perceived ROI Versus Formally Measured ROI 100
6% 3% 10%
9%
17%
13%
50-100%
17%
■ The potential of BIM to improve
productivity is ranked by architects as the top way to improve their return on investment in the technology. during construction are among the top rated ways engineers say BIM adds value to a project. ■ Clash detection and avoiding
25-50% 60
rated business benefit among experts. Four in five experts say it brings high to very high value, compared to 23% of beginners.
■ Reduced conflicts and changes
Over 100%
10%
80
■ Reducing rework is the highest-
25%
rework are the top rated ways owners say BIM saves time and money.
10-25% 40
21% 20
26%
15% 14%
Break even
14%
Negative
0
Do Not Measure Source: McGraw-Hill Construction, 2009
4
Less than 10%
Measure
BIM Defined For purposes of this report, McGrawHill Construction defines BIM as: The process of creating and using digital models for design, construction and/or operations of projects.
Challenges to Adoption Beyond client demand, non-users see challenges that are of moderate to lesser concern when considering whether to adopt BIM. As a new technology, dealing with costs and training issues have been the greatest hurdles on the path to adoption.
Importance of BIM in 5 Years 100
11%
Very high importance
31%
High importance
39%
Moderate importance
16% 3%
Low importance
■ Haven’t had sufficient time to evaluate BIM: With construction running at
record highs in recent years, many firms had been too focused on their existing projects to consider testing new methods. In light of the recent slowdown in new construction, firms may find this is not a significant issue moving forward. ■ Software/hardware upgrades too expensive. Architects and engineers are
most likely to believe this, which could reflect the fact that they generally bring in lower revenues than contractors.
80
60
40
20
■ Functionality doesn’t apply well enough to what we do. Engineers are most
likely to believe this, which illustrates a belief that BIM is not addressing their practice-related needs.
0
No importance
Source: McGraw-Hill Construction, 2009
■ Insufficient BIM-compatible content available for my needs. Owners rank
this among their top reasons for not implementing BIM, which could indicate that they see BIM as more relevant to the work of other team members.
Issues With Little Impact on Adoption Some issues that have been identified by users as challenging are not seen as significant barriers to adoption by non-users. At least half of non-users say these factors have little to no influence on their decision not to adopt BIM: ■ Concerns about insurance/liability: 64%
■ Poor interoperability with CAD applications: 54% ■ Software too difficult to use: 51% ■ Insufficient training available: 50%
Most Important Obstacles to BIM Adoption Very High/High 67%
Haven’t had sufficient time to evaluate it Software too expensive Functionality doesn’t apply well enough to what we do Required hardware upgrades too expensive Source: McGraw-Hill Construction, 2009
49% 41% 35% 33%
About two in five non-users (42%) believe that BIM will be highly or very highly important to the industry in five years. Only a small group of them (13%) say they either have no interest in using it, or have tried it and decided not to use it again. The vast majority are open to exploring it. Evaluating factors that would prompt non-users to adopt, client requirement ranks as the most important. Two-thirds say they don’t see enough demand from clients yet. However, 55% of owners say that BIM will be highly or very highly important to the industry in five years – more than any of the other team members surveyed. If owners see BIM as important and can push it as a requirement, more adoption will follow. (See Client Demand for BIM on page 39).
■ Current methods we use are better: 62%
Not enough demand from clients and/or other firms on projects
Upbeat Future Outlook
Believing in the cost effectiveness of BIM ranked as the second most important factor that would encourage adoption. And when asked about reasons for delaying adoption, concerns about BIM’s cost and it’s effectiveness on smaller projects are the top two reasons given. Six in ten (59%) non-users believe that BIM seems less efficient for smaller projects, while 54% list cost required as a limiting factor. Firms that focus on smaller jobs need to understand BIM’s value in that context in order to make the investment.
41
National Guidelines for Digital Modelling
IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
-
Electrical engineer: electrical pits in slabs, electrical cable ducts and conduits in slabs
-
Civil engineer: retaining wall layout, set-out from architectural model, extra properties added to structural objects, structural connection rules and relationships: beam to beam, beam to column, wall to column, beam to wall, slab to wall, columns, beams, slabs, braces, walls, footings, piers, piles, trusses, loading for functions, autocheck for member support. Structural analysis model is not normally exchanged but used for investigation of structural options
Figure 3.5 Structural model of 8 Chifley Square
Data exported to architectural model of adjusted sizes for: -
interference checking of 3D geometry
-
revisions tracked
-
auto connection of analytical and physical models.
Phases 4 and 5 – Contract documents and construction -
IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Fabrication and construction model is used for material procurement; fabrication design and details; quantity take-off and estimating; scheduling of construction sequence; tracking of elements, with use of RFID and barcoding; transportation, site handling; finishing/QA, inspections and approvals Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
Discipline modelling, analysis and simulation
(Image courtesy of Arup)
41
structures, roofing, glass roofs, skylights, hatches
Figure 3.3 Visualisation model of 8 Chifley Square -
Elements of internal space: space dividers, partitions, glass partitions, balustrades, internal doors, specific doors, space stairs, suspended ceilings, standard fittings, specific fittings, standard machine and devices
Modelling of building objects Walls to be modelled using wall tool from slab to slab to storey heights, with internal and external walls distinguished. Walls and spaces to be related. Walls of multiple storey height modelled separately for each storey
-
Doors and windows to be modelled using door or window tool, with type and fittings information, connected to walls. Consistent and stated dimensioning to either frames or openings. Doors and windows associated to spaces and changed when either edited
-
Glass and curtain walls. Solid wall that hosts glass or curtain walls or facades must be modelled first, then doors and windows added. There should be no gaps between host wall and openings. Multiple storey height curtain walls modelled by storey with appropriate openings each storey
-
Slabs (ground floor, floor and attic floor) to be modelled using slab tool. The joining of slabs to walls modelled so that slab ends on surface of load-bearing wall for consistent data for quantity take-off and cost calculation. Floors modelled to extend to the inner surface of the external wall
-
Roofs, beams, stairs and columns to be modelled using correct tools
-
Columns modelled by outer dimensions including surface structure
(Image courtesy of Mirvac)
3.2.4 Phases 3 and 4 – Developed design and contract document BIM -
Material information linked to spaces through space number and name, also room painting, and other specifications
-
Building elements with type information as per building specification may have specific supplier
-
Each storey modelled separately, thus multistorey walls and spaces modelled separately on each storey
Required information content: -
Elements of the building: ground gloor, ground floor slabs, structural frame, load-bearing walls, columns, beams, floor slabs, attic floor slabs, structure frame stairs, facades, external walls, windows, external doors, external decks, balconies, canopies, roofs, roof sub-
IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Information required by architect from other disciplines: -
Civil engineer: platforms, roadways, parking, ground levels, cut and fill, site drainage
-
Mechanical engineer: plant layout outlines, vents, exhausts, plant, ductwork, air ducts, air returns, intakes, penetrations
-
Electrical, fire and data engineers: cables, penetrations, external lighting, distribution points on site plan, distribution point on floor plan, electrical symbols on floor and ceiling Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
Discipline modelling, analysis and simulation
-
39
Dr. Guillermo Aranda-Mena. RMIT Melbourne.
Innovation in the Built Environment Academy - LONDON - 2011
IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena Š 2011
6
CIFE
CENTER FOR INTEGRATED FACILITY ENGINEERING
Relationships Between Project Complexity and Communication
By
Reid Senescu, Guillermo Aranda-Mena, and John Haymaker
CIFE Technical Report #TR196 January 2011
STANFORD UNIVERSITY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
The Relationship Between Product Organization Process Complexity and Communication Challenges Reid R. Senescu, Guillermo Aranda-Mena, John R. Haymaker
IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena Š 2011
12
Figure!65:!Moving!between!a!parametric!model!to!structural!analysis!and!the!comparison! of!!performative!aspects!from!multiple!design!options,!Source:!Author!and!Arup!!
5.1.3. Optioneering across disciplines My research in building practice with Arup specialists suggests that processes guided though optioneering do not necessarily need to consider design-criteria across multiple disciplines. Optioneering is well suited to address multi-criteria optimisation within the boundaries of a single, or a selected few discipline. At the same time, I contend that the benefits offered through optioneering in the context of building design are particularly relevant when applied across several disciplines. Work on the Rectangular Pitch Stadium project at Arup revealed that optioneering can facilitate lateral thinking between design professions. In doing so, a network of connections can be established across disciplines that is based on the specific requirements of design performance. The configuration of the network can vary depending on the required evaluation between a number of participants at a given point in the collaborative effort. The scenario described in Figure 66 is an example showing a network of collaborating professions who are laterally interconnected. 217 IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
Table!1:!Summary!of!
topic Primary concern in the early design stages Type of performance indicators in early design stages Measurements and units Awareness of cost implications for design changes Feedback mostly required from others Type of geometrical entity used for performance analysis and representation Modeling tolerance Types of (geometric) modeling required Ratio between group decisionmaking sole investigation Preferred media to pass on information to others Preferred media for receiving information from others
ACOUSTIC
topics!describing!
room sizing adjacencies noise levels type of interior finishes types of room volumes reverberation times noise cancellation room acoustic targets
characteristics!of! acoustic!engineering!!
sound intensity (W/m2) reverberation (RT60) frequency (hertz) sound pressure (dB) More information desired architectural: building shape and volume faรงades: cladding material interior: finishes, material usage
Approximately 400mm, depending frequency level that is investigated auralisation acoustic response reverberation
on
Auralisation reports combining text-based and visual means 2D plans and sections charts, maps, graphs reports combining text- based and visual means verbal explanation
198 IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
topic Primary concern in the early design stages Type of performance indicators in early design stages Measurements and units Awareness of cost implications for design changes Feedback mostly required from others
ARCHITECTURE fulfilling the program design aesthetics functionality spatial synthesis cultural relevance ........ depending on local -building-codes net to gross ratio massing budget compliance Area (m2) cost per m2 ($/m2) height/length (m) More information desired
Table!2:!Summary!of! topics!describing! characteristics!of! architectural!design!!
all/QS: basic costing structures: grid, sizing environmental: daylight mechanical: service zone requirements
Type of geometrical entity used for performance analysis and representation Modeling tolerance Types of (geometric) modeling required Ratio between group decisionmaking sole investigation Preferred media to pass on information to others Preferred media for receiving information from others
Building: approx. 50 -100 mm Urban: 1000-2000 mm 2D/3D visualisation massing, overshading surface interior/exterior
3D digital models 3D physical models hand-sketches charts, maps, graphs 3D digital model section with analysis results exemplary photographs 3D digital models (ideally shared)
199 IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
topic
ENVIRONMENTAL
Primary concern in sustainability initiatives the early design stages carbon footprint / CO2 resourcefulness, lifecycle cost Green Star/LEED/BREEAM Type of performance Energy use, Water use indicators in early Carbon output design stages Thermal transmittance, Lighting demand Measurements and Daylight (lx) units skylight glare (% - index) emission (CO2) ....... Awareness of cost More information desired implications for design changes Feedback mostly mechanical: energy efficiency required from others faรงades: glazing type fire: zoning requirements architect: massing Type of geometrical entity used for performance analysis and representation
Modeling tolerance Types of (geometric) modeling required
Table!3:!Summary!of! topics!describing! characteristics!of! environmental! sustainable!design!!
Walls: 500mm Small scale elements: 200mm life-cycle analysis lighting analysis fluid dynamics
Ratio between group decision-making sole investigation Preferred media to pass on information to others Preferred media for
charts, maps, tables, 3D digital model section with analysis results mapped on graphically hand-sketches 3D digital models, 2D plans and
receiving information
sections, hand-sketches, charts, maps,
from others:
graphs, reports combining text- based and visual means
200 IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
Dominik Holzer, PhD
Dominik Holzer, PhD
A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK TO INVESTIGATE BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING THROUGH KNOWLEDGE ELICITATION AND VISUAL MODELS Bilal Succar, Willy Sher, University of Newcastle and Guillermo Aranda-Mena, RMIT AUBEA 2007
A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK TO INVESTIGATE BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING THROUGH KNOWLEDGE ELICITATION AND VISUAL MODELS Bilal Succar, Willy Sher, University of Newcastle and Guillermo Aranda-Mena, RMIT AUBEA 2007
Dr. Guillermo Aranda-Mena. RMIT Melbourne.
Presentation to the Faculty of Architecture, TU Delft, NL
9.Dec.2010
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
30 Panels : 3200 x 10500 Standardised fast erection sequence Structure / Enclosure
BRACED (TIED) IN ROOF PLANE
YARDMASTERS BUILDING SOUTHERN CROSS STATION AUTHORITY
project 227 YARDMASTERS date 31.03.2006
Sketch Design
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS BUILDING SOUTHERN CROSS STATION AUTHORITY
project 227 YARDMASTERS date 31.03.2006
Sketch Design
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS BUILDING SOUTHERN CROSS STATION AUTHORITY
project 227 YARDMASTERS date 31.03.2006
Sketch Design
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS BUILDING SOUTHERN CROSS STATION AUTHORITY
project 227 YARDMASTERS date 31.03.2006
Sketch Design
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS BUILDING SOUTHERN CROSS STATION AUTHORITY
project 227 YARDMASTERS date 31.03.2006
Sketch Design
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
Material
Labour / Process
Risk / Contingency
Budget
$
Overrun
Thoroughly Unscientific Diagram Representing Building Costs
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
Material
Labour / Process
Risk / Contingency
Budget
$
Overrun
Thoroughly Unscientific Diagram Representing Building Costs
YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
Carlton Brewery UNITED - Consultant Brief Summary Apartments m2/No. Car Spaces
85 m2
171 0
Castlemaine (Building 1) Level GFA
Basement 5+
% Efficiency
NLA/NSA
7,234
Basement 5+ Plant
521
Basement 4
542
Basement 4 Plant
32
Basement 3
85
Basement 3 Plant Basement 2
85
Basement 2 Plant Basement 1
85
Basement 1 Plant Basement 1 Loading Basement 1 Pub. Circ. Lower Ground (Below Ground)
169
Lower Ground Plant Lower Gnd Pub. Circ. Lower Ground (Above Ground GFA) Ground (GFA)
177
Ground (Non-GFA) Level 1
85
Level 2
85
Level 3
85
Level 4
1,903
85%
1,617
Level 5
1,903
85%
1,617
Level 6
1,903
85%
1,617
Level 7
1,903
85%
1,617
Level 8
1,903
85%
1,617
Level 9
1,903
85%
1,617
Level 10
1,903
85%
1,617
Level 11
1,903
85%
1,617
Level 12
1,903
85%
1,617
26,309
55%
14,556
Level 13 Level 14 Level 15 Level 16 Level 17 Level 18 Level 19 Level 20 Level 21 Level 22 Level 22 Plant Level 23 Level 24 Level 25 Level 26 Level 27 Level 28 Level 29
THE BREWERY
Level 30 Level 31 Level 32 TOTALS
IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE UNITED - Consultant Brief - Levels
9:29
THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE
Construction Segmentation Key Customers
17
“MacLeamy Curve” Patrick MacLeamy CEO
13
RMIT - Aranda-Mena, Dr. Guillermo
Home
About RMIT
Contact
All contacts
Staff
by name
Page 1 of 1
A
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena Position
Senior Lecturer
School / Work Unit
Property Const & Project Mgt
Contact Details
+(61 3) 9925 9512 guillermo.aranda-mena@rmit.edu.au
Location
Building: 8 Level: 8 Room: 68 City Campus
College/Portfolio Design & Social Context
Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena Guillermo is currently a Senior Lecturer in Property, Construction and Project Management at RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. He holds a PhD in Construction Management and Engineering from The University of Reading and a Masters of Science in European Construction Engineering from Loughborough University of Technology, both in the United Kingdom. In 2003 Guillermo was appointed Post Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of Newcastle, Australia, working on a Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation (CRC-CI) research project in Building Information Modelling (BIM) in collaboration with the Common Wealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Ove Arup and Woods Bagot Architects. He has been principal investigator of four CRC-CI research projects including ‘Business Drivers for BIM’, ‘Mobilising Construction’, ‘eBusiness Adoption in Construction’ and ‘Automated BIM Estimator’. He is currently RMIT Project Leader for the CRC-CI BIM National Guidelines and Case Studies. He is currently supervising various Masters Theses and two PhDs. Guillermo is a Conjoint Academic to the Singapore Institute of Management, Singapore and the University of Newcastle, Australia. [Next: Publications]
EXPLORE Programs & courses
Students
Research
Industry
Alumni
Future students International students How to apply Entrance requirements Fees Scholarships
Login to myRMIT Study resources Administration Student services Get involved
Focus areas Research Institutes Postgraduate programs Partnerships Fellowships Publications
Workforce development Work placements R & D consultancy Employing graduates
News Events Special offers Giving to RMIT
About RMIT Learning & teaching Colleges & schools Campuses & maps Employment News
INTERACT WITH RMIT Copyright © 2012 RMIT University Disclaimer Privacy Accessibility Website feedback ABN 49 781 030 034 CRICOS provider number: 00122A Print version Open Universities Australia
http://www.rmit.edu.au/staff/guillermo
15/03/2012