Guillermo Aranda-Mena

National Guidelines for Digital Modelling

DR GUILLERMO ARANDA-MENA THE PPP CLUB - LECTURE SERIES 2012

15 MARCH 2012

The project participants

Industry

Government

Research

Construction Innovation also wishes to thank and acknowledge Colleen Foelz (Construction Innovation and edenink) for managing the production of this publication, as well as Sue Ferguson (itzdesign) and Gail Cartwright (wordwright) for their design and editing respectively.

DR GUILLERMO ARANDA-MENA THE PPP CLUB - LECTURE SERIES 2012

15 MARCH 2012

National Guidelines for Digital Modelling

Our thanks go to all those who attended and contributed to the success of this publication through their participation in the workshops held in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth.

ix

Foreword These National Guidelines and Case Studies for Digital Modelling are the outcomes from one of a number of Building Information Modelling (BIM)-related projects undertaken by the CRC for Construction Innovation. Since the CRC opened its doors in 2001, the industry has seen a rapid increase in interest in BIM, and widening adoption.

These guidelines and case studies are thus very timely, as the industry moves to model-based working and starts to share models in a new context called integrated practice. Governments, both federal and state, and in New Zealand are starting to outline the role they might take, so that in contrast to the adoption of 2D CAD in the early 90s, we ensure that a national, industry-wide benefit results from this new paradigm of working.

Section 1 of the guidelines give us an overview of BIM: how it affects our current mode of working, what we need to do to move to fully collaborative model-based facility development. The role of open standards such as IFC is described as a mechanism to support new processes, and make the extensive design and construction information available to asset operators and managers. Digital collaboration modes, types of models, levels of detail, object properties and model management complete this section. It will be relevant for owners, managers and project leaders as well as direct users of BIM. Section 2 provides recommendations and guides for key areas of model creation and development, and the move to simulation and performance measurement. These are the more practical parts of the guidelines developed for design professionals, BIM managers, technical staff and ‘in the field’ workers.

The guidelines are supported by six case studies including a summary of lessons learnt about implementing BIM in Australian building projects.

A key aspect of these publications is the identification of a number of important industry actions: the need for BIM-compatible product information and a national context for classifying product data; the need for an industry agreement and setting process-for-process definition; and finally, the need to ensure a national standard for sharing data between all of the participants in the facility-development process.

buildingSMART International Alliance for Interoperability

David Parken CEO, Australian Institute of Architects

National Guidelines for Digital Modelling

John Mitchell Chairman, buildingSMART Australasia

iii

Acknowledgments The CRC for Construction Innovation provided the major funding, industry research leadership and coordinated the development of National Guidelines for Digital Modelling and accompanying Case Studies.

The Construction Innovation project team members are: Project Leader Tom Fussell (Project Services Queensland Department of Housing and Works) Project Manager National Digital Modelling Guidelines — Scott Beazley (QUT) Project Manager Case Studies — Guillermo Aranda-Mena (RMIT University) Researchers: Guillermo Aranda-Mena, Agustin Chevez, John Crawford, Bilal Succar (RMIT University) John Hainsworth —Arup Australasia Simon Hardy — Bovis Lend Lease Shane McAtee, Garry McCann, Richard Rizzalli — Mirvac Paul Akhurst , Chris Linning — Sydney Opera House David Marchant — Woods Bagot Joyce Law, Phillip Lord, Dean Morse — Brisbane City Council Paul Crapper — Building Commission John Spathonis — Qld Dept of Main Roads Scott Beazley, Robin Drogemuller, Stephan Gard, David Nielsen — Queensland University of Technology Guillermo Aranda-Mena, Ron Wakefield — RMIT

National Guidelines for Digital Modelling

Integrated Digital Modelling Taskforce

viii

Chair: Andrew Gutteridge (AIA) Representatives from the following organisations served on the taskforce.

Association of Consulting Engineers Australia Australian Institute of Architects Australian Institute of Building Australian Institute of Quantity Surveyors BuildingSMART Australasia Facility Management Association of Australia

THE BUSINESS VALUE OF BIM Getting Building Information Modeling to the Bottom Line

Corporate Contributor Sponsors

Association Premier Partners

Government Premier Partner

Premier Corporate Partner

Table of Contents Introduction SmartMarket Report Executive Summary .........................4 Overall Value of BIM .....................................................................6 Case Study: Research 2........................................................................10 Industry Issue: Impact of BIM on Productivity..................................12 Industry Issue: Return on Investment in BIM ....................................13

Internal Business Value of BIM ............................................14 Industry Issue: Impact of BIM on Marketing.....................................18 Case Study: Texas A&M Health Science Center.............................19

Project Value of BIM...................................................................20 Case Study: Sutter Health Medical Center ......................................24 Industry Issue: BIM and Green Building............................................26 Case Study: Virtual Mock-Ups .............................................................27

Player Value of BIM.....................................................................28 Software Industry Perspective .............................................................35

Adoption of BIM............................................................................36 Case Study: Department of Energy ....................................................43 Industry Issue: Opportunities and Obstacles for Engineers .........44 Case Study: BIM on Heavy Civil Projects.........................................46

Conclusions.....................................................................................48 Images courtesy of Mortenson Construction

Resources ........................................................................................50 Methodology ...................................................................................50

Cover images provided by Bryan Christie Design

3

SmartMarket Report Executive Summary Reaping Higher Returns During Lean Times Even as the design and construction industry confronts a down economy, most BIM users are seeing positive payback from their use of the technology, according to McGraw-Hill Construction research. Users gain bankable benefits that enhance productivity, improve their ability to integrate teams and give them an edge on the competition. The value from BIM grows as users gain experience, offering them an opportunity to reap greater returns even during an economic recession.

Key Findings ■ Two-thirds of BIM users say they see positive ROI on their overall investment in BIM. ■ 87% of expert users are experiencing positive ROI with BIM. ■ 93% of BIM users believe there is potential to gain more value from BIM in the future.

Better Than Expected Value

Competitive Advantage

Improved Productivity

Return on investment can be calculated in various ways, but those who take a data-driven approach see more upside to BIM. Users who formally measure their ROI report better returns than those who estimate ROI based on perception.

BIM is seen as a way to get a leg up on the competition. This is particularly true among less experienced users who are promoting a new service.

■ Seven in ten BIM users who

■ Half of users say offering new

BIM creates efficiencies. Users realize some of the greatest value of BIM through its potential to cut down on rework, such as rekeying information into models or making changes in the field. As users become more proficient, the opportunities to improve productivity are more pronounced.

■ Marketing new business to new

clients is the top rated business benefit of BIM.

measure ROI see positive returns, compared to half of those who only go by their perception of value.

services with BIM is a significant business benefit.

■ Two-thirds of users say BIM’s ability

to help a company maintain repeat business with past clients brings at least a moderate level of value.

■ One in five BIM users who meas-

ure ROI see returns greater than 50%—double the perceived value.

Perceived ROI Versus Formally Measured ROI 100

6% 3% 10%

9%

17%

13%

50-100%

17%

■ The potential of BIM to improve

productivity is ranked by architects as the top way to improve their return on investment in the technology. during construction are among the top rated ways engineers say BIM adds value to a project.

■ Clash detection and avoiding

25-50% 60

rated business benefit among experts. Four in five experts say it brings high to very high value, compared to 23% of beginners.

■ Reduced conflicts and changes

Over 100%

10%

80

■ Reducing rework is the highest-

25%

rework are the top rated ways owners say BIM saves time and money.

10-25% 40

21% 20

26%

15% 14%

Break even

14%

Negative

0

Do Not Measure Source: McGraw-Hill Construction, 2009

4

Less than 10%

Measure

BIM Defined For purposes of this report, McGrawHill Construction defines BIM as: The process of creating and using digital models for design, construction and/or operations of projects.

Challenges to Adoption Beyond client demand, non-users see challenges that are of moderate to lesser concern when considering whether to adopt BIM. As a new technology, dealing with costs and training issues have been the greatest hurdles on the path to adoption.

Importance of BIM in 5 Years 100

11%

Very high importance

31%

High importance

39%

Moderate importance

16% 3%

Low importance

■ Haven’t had sufficient time to evaluate BIM: With construction running at

record highs in recent years, many firms had been too focused on their existing projects to consider testing new methods. In light of the recent slowdown in new construction, firms may find this is not a significant issue moving forward.

■ Software/hardware upgrades too expensive. Architects and engineers are

most likely to believe this, which could reflect the fact that they generally bring in lower revenues than contractors.

80

60

40

20

■ Functionality doesn’t apply well enough to what we do. Engineers are most

likely to believe this, which illustrates a belief that BIM is not addressing their practice-related needs.

0

No importance

Source: McGraw-Hill Construction, 2009

■ Insufficient BIM-compatible content available for my needs. Owners rank

this among their top reasons for not implementing BIM, which could indicate that they see BIM as more relevant to the work of other team members.

Issues With Little Impact on Adoption Some issues that have been identified by users as challenging are not seen as significant barriers to adoption by non-users. At least half of non-users say these factors have little to no influence on their decision not to adopt BIM: ■ Concerns about insurance/liability: 64%

■ Poor interoperability with CAD applications: 54% ■ Software too difficult to use: 51% ■ Insufficient training available: 50%

Most Important Obstacles to BIM Adoption Very High/High 67%

Haven’t had sufficient time to evaluate it Software too expensive Functionality doesn’t apply well enough to what we do Required hardware upgrades too expensive Source: McGraw-Hill Construction, 2009

49% 41% 35% 33%

About two in five non-users (42%) believe that BIM will be highly or very highly important to the industry in five years. Only a small group of them (13%) say they either have no interest in using it, or have tried it and decided not to use it again. The vast majority are open to exploring it.

Evaluating factors that would prompt non-users to adopt, client requirement ranks as the most important. Two-thirds say they don’t see enough demand from clients yet. However, 55% of owners say that BIM will be highly or very highly important to the industry in five years – more than any of the other team members surveyed. If owners see BIM as important and can push it as a requirement, more adoption will follow. (See Client Demand for BIM on page 39).

■ Current methods we use are better: 62%

Not enough demand from clients and/or other firms on projects

Upbeat Future Outlook

Believing in the cost effectiveness of BIM ranked as the second most important factor that would encourage adoption. And when asked about reasons for delaying adoption, concerns about BIM’s cost and it’s effectiveness on smaller projects are the top two reasons given.

Six in ten (59%) non-users believe that BIM seems less efficient for smaller projects, while 54% list cost required as a limiting factor. Firms that focus on smaller jobs need to understand BIM’s value in that context in order to make the investment.

41

National Guidelines for Digital Modelling

IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

-

Electrical engineer: electrical pits in slabs, electrical cable ducts and conduits in slabs

-

Civil engineer: retaining wall layout, set-out from architectural model, extra properties added to structural objects, structural connection rules and relationships: beam to beam, beam to column, wall to column, beam to wall, slab to wall, columns, beams, slabs, braces, walls, footings, piers, piles, trusses, loading for functions, autocheck for member support. Structural analysis model is not normally exchanged but used for investigation of structural options

Figure 3.5 Structural model of 8 Chifley Square

Data exported to architectural model of adjusted sizes for: -

interference checking of 3D geometry

-

revisions tracked

-

auto connection of analytical and physical models.

Phases 4 and 5 – Contract documents and construction -

IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Fabrication and construction model is used for material procurement; fabrication design and details; quantity take-off and estimating; scheduling of construction sequence; tracking of elements, with use of RFID and barcoding; transportation, site handling; finishing/QA, inspections and approvals Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

Discipline modelling, analysis and simulation

(Image courtesy of Arup)

41

structures, roofing, glass roofs, skylights, hatches

Figure 3.3 Visualisation model of 8 Chifley Square -

Elements of internal space: space dividers, partitions, glass partitions, balustrades, internal doors, specific doors, space stairs, suspended ceilings, standard fittings, specific fittings, standard machine and devices

Modelling of building objects Walls to be modelled using wall tool from slab to slab to storey heights, with internal and external walls distinguished. Walls and spaces to be related. Walls of multiple storey height modelled separately for each storey

-

Doors and windows to be modelled using door or window tool, with type and fittings information, connected to walls. Consistent and stated dimensioning to either frames or openings. Doors and windows associated to spaces and changed when either edited

-

Glass and curtain walls. Solid wall that hosts glass or curtain walls or facades must be modelled first, then doors and windows added. There should be no gaps between host wall and openings. Multiple storey height curtain walls modelled by storey with appropriate openings each storey

-

Slabs (ground floor, floor and attic floor) to be modelled using slab tool. The joining of slabs to walls modelled so that slab ends on surface of load-bearing wall for consistent data for quantity take-off and cost calculation. Floors modelled to extend to the inner surface of the external wall

-

Roofs, beams, stairs and columns to be modelled using correct tools

-

Columns modelled by outer dimensions including surface structure

(Image courtesy of Mirvac)

3.2.4 Phases 3 and 4 – Developed design and contract document BIM -

Material information linked to spaces through space number and name, also room painting, and other specifications

-

Building elements with type information as per building specification may have specific supplier

-

Each storey modelled separately, thus multistorey walls and spaces modelled separately on each storey

Required information content: -

Elements of the building: ground gloor, ground floor slabs, structural frame, load-bearing walls, columns, beams, floor slabs, attic floor slabs, structure frame stairs, facades, external walls, windows, external doors, external decks, balconies, canopies, roofs, roof sub-

IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Information required by architect from other disciplines: -

Civil engineer: platforms, roadways, parking, ground levels, cut and fill, site drainage

-

Mechanical engineer: plant layout outlines, vents, exhausts, plant, ductwork, air ducts, air returns, intakes, penetrations

-

Electrical, fire and data engineers: cables, penetrations, external lighting, distribution points on site plan, distribution point on floor plan, electrical symbols on floor and ceiling Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

Discipline modelling, analysis and simulation

-

39

Dr. Guillermo Aranda-Mena. RMIT Melbourne.

Innovation in the Built Environment Academy - LONDON - 2011

IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena Š 2011

6

CIFE

CENTER FOR INTEGRATED FACILITY ENGINEERING

Relationships Between Project Complexity and Communication

By

Reid Senescu, Guillermo Aranda-Mena, and John Haymaker

CIFE Technical Report #TR196 January 2011

STANFORD UNIVERSITY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

The Relationship Between Product Organization Process Complexity and Communication Challenges Reid R. Senescu, Guillermo Aranda-Mena, John R. Haymaker

IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena Š 2011

12

Figure!65:!Moving!between!a!parametric!model!to!structural!analysis!and!the!comparison! of!!performative!aspects!from!multiple!design!options,!Source:!Author!and!Arup!!

5.1.3. Optioneering across disciplines My research in building practice with Arup specialists suggests that processes guided though optioneering do not necessarily need to consider design-criteria across multiple disciplines. Optioneering is well suited to address multi-criteria optimisation within the boundaries of a single, or a selected few discipline. At the same time, I contend that the benefits offered through optioneering in the context of building design are particularly relevant when applied across several disciplines.

Work on the Rectangular Pitch Stadium project at Arup revealed that optioneering can facilitate lateral thinking between design professions. In doing so, a network of connections can be established across disciplines that is based on the specific requirements of design performance. The configuration of the network can vary depending on the required evaluation between a number of participants at a given point in the collaborative effort. The scenario described in Figure 66 is an example showing a network of collaborating professions who are laterally interconnected.

217 IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

Table!1:!Summary!of!

topic Primary concern in the early design stages Type of performance indicators in early design stages Measurements and units Awareness of cost implications for design changes Feedback mostly required from others Type of geometrical entity used for performance analysis and representation Modeling tolerance Types of (geometric) modeling required Ratio between group decisionmaking sole investigation Preferred media to pass on information to others Preferred media for receiving information from others

ACOUSTIC

topics!describing!

room sizing adjacencies noise levels type of interior finishes types of room volumes reverberation times noise cancellation room acoustic targets

characteristics!of! acoustic!engineering!!

sound intensity (W/m2) reverberation (RT60) frequency (hertz) sound pressure (dB) More information desired architectural: building shape and volume faรงades: cladding material interior: finishes, material usage

Approximately 400mm, depending frequency level that is investigated auralisation acoustic response reverberation

on

Auralisation reports combining text-based and visual means 2D plans and sections charts, maps, graphs reports combining text- based and visual means verbal explanation

198 IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

topic Primary concern in the early design stages Type of performance indicators in early design stages Measurements and units Awareness of cost implications for design changes Feedback mostly required from others

ARCHITECTURE fulfilling the program design aesthetics functionality spatial synthesis cultural relevance ........ depending on local -building-codes net to gross ratio massing budget compliance Area (m2) cost per m2 ($/m2) height/length (m) More information desired

Table!2:!Summary!of! topics!describing! characteristics!of! architectural!design!!

all/QS: basic costing structures: grid, sizing environmental: daylight mechanical: service zone requirements

Type of geometrical entity used for performance analysis and representation Modeling tolerance Types of (geometric) modeling required Ratio between group decisionmaking sole investigation Preferred media to pass on information to others Preferred media for receiving information from others

Building: approx. 50 -100 mm Urban: 1000-2000 mm 2D/3D visualisation massing, overshading surface interior/exterior

3D digital models 3D physical models hand-sketches charts, maps, graphs 3D digital model section with analysis results exemplary photographs 3D digital models (ideally shared)

199 IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

topic

ENVIRONMENTAL

Primary concern in sustainability initiatives the early design stages carbon footprint / CO2 resourcefulness, lifecycle cost Green Star/LEED/BREEAM Type of performance Energy use, Water use indicators in early Carbon output design stages Thermal transmittance, Lighting demand Measurements and Daylight (lx) units skylight glare (% - index) emission (CO2) .......

Awareness of cost More information desired implications for design changes Feedback mostly mechanical: energy efficiency required from others faรงades: glazing type fire: zoning requirements architect: massing Type of geometrical entity used for performance analysis and representation

Modeling tolerance Types of (geometric) modeling required

Table!3:!Summary!of! topics!describing! characteristics!of! environmental! sustainable!design!!

Walls: 500mm Small scale elements: 200mm life-cycle analysis lighting analysis fluid dynamics

Ratio between group decision-making sole investigation Preferred media to pass on information to others Preferred media for

charts, maps, tables, 3D digital model section with analysis results mapped on graphically hand-sketches 3D digital models, 2D plans and

receiving information

sections, hand-sketches, charts, maps,

from others:

graphs, reports combining text- based and visual means

200 IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

Dominik Holzer, PhD

Dominik Holzer, PhD

A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK TO INVESTIGATE BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING THROUGH KNOWLEDGE ELICITATION AND VISUAL MODELS Bilal Succar, Willy Sher, University of Newcastle and Guillermo Aranda-Mena, RMIT AUBEA 2007

A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK TO INVESTIGATE BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING THROUGH KNOWLEDGE ELICITATION AND VISUAL MODELS Bilal Succar, Willy Sher, University of Newcastle and Guillermo Aranda-Mena, RMIT AUBEA 2007

Dr. Guillermo Aranda-Mena. RMIT Melbourne.

Presentation to the Faculty of Architecture, TU Delft, NL

9.Dec.2010

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

 30 Panels : 3200 x 10500  Standardised fast erection sequence  Structure / Enclosure

BRACED (TIED) IN ROOF PLANE

YARDMASTERS BUILDING SOUTHERN CROSS STATION AUTHORITY

project 227 YARDMASTERS date 31.03.2006

Sketch Design

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS BUILDING SOUTHERN CROSS STATION AUTHORITY

project 227 YARDMASTERS date 31.03.2006

Sketch Design

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS BUILDING SOUTHERN CROSS STATION AUTHORITY

project 227 YARDMASTERS date 31.03.2006

Sketch Design

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS BUILDING SOUTHERN CROSS STATION AUTHORITY

project 227 YARDMASTERS date 31.03.2006

Sketch Design

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS BUILDING SOUTHERN CROSS STATION AUTHORITY

project 227 YARDMASTERS date 31.03.2006

Sketch Design

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

Material

Labour / Process

Risk / Contingency

Budget

$

Overrun

Thoroughly Unscientific Diagram Representing Building Costs

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

Material

Labour / Process

Risk / Contingency

Budget

$

Overrun

Thoroughly Unscientific Diagram Representing Building Costs

YARDMASTERS IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

Carlton Brewery UNITED - Consultant Brief Summary Apartments m2/No. Car Spaces

85 m2

171 0

Castlemaine (Building 1) Level GFA

Basement 5+

% Efficiency

NLA/NSA

7,234

Basement 5+ Plant

521

Basement 4

542

Basement 4 Plant

32

Basement 3

85

Basement 3 Plant Basement 2

85

Basement 2 Plant Basement 1

85

Basement 1 Plant Basement 1 Loading Basement 1 Pub. Circ.

Lower Ground (Below Ground)

169

Lower Ground Plant Lower Gnd Pub. Circ.

Lower Ground (Above Ground GFA) Ground (GFA)

177

Ground (Non-GFA) Level 1

85

Level 2

85

Level 3

85

Level 4

1,903

85%

1,617

Level 5

1,903

85%

1,617

Level 6

1,903

85%

1,617

Level 7

1,903

85%

1,617

Level 8

1,903

85%

1,617

Level 9

1,903

85%

1,617

Level 10

1,903

85%

1,617

Level 11

1,903

85%

1,617

Level 12

1,903

85%

1,617

26,309

55%

14,556

Level 13 Level 14 Level 15 Level 16 Level 17 Level 18 Level 19 Level 20 Level 21 Level 22 Level 22 Plant Level 23 Level 24 Level 25 Level 26 Level 27 Level 28 Level 29

THE BREWERY

Level 30 Level 31 Level 32 TOTALS

IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE UNITED - Consultant Brief - Levels

9:29

 

               

  

                   

        

  

 

 

                   



            

   





   

   

   

    











   

   



   



   





   

   

 

 

 

 



             

       

   



   

   

   



 





   



   



                         



   





   

   

 

        

   



   

   

   



 





   



   



   





   

   

THE BREWERY IBEA LONDON 7-9 October 2011

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena RMIT MELBOURNE

Construction Segmentation Key Customers

17

“MacLeamy Curve” Patrick MacLeamy CEO

13

RMIT - Aranda-Mena, Dr. Guillermo

Home

About RMIT

Contact

All contacts

Staff

by name

Page 1 of 1

A

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena Position

Senior Lecturer

School / Work Unit

Property Const & Project Mgt

Contact Details

+(61 3) 9925 9512 guillermo.aranda-mena@rmit.edu.au

Location

Building: 8 Level: 8 Room: 68 City Campus

College/Portfolio Design & Social Context

Dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena Guillermo is currently a Senior Lecturer in Property, Construction and Project Management at RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. He holds a PhD in Construction Management and Engineering from The University of Reading and a Masters of Science in European Construction Engineering from Loughborough University of Technology, both in the United Kingdom. In 2003 Guillermo was appointed Post Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of Newcastle, Australia, working on a Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation (CRC-CI) research project in Building Information Modelling (BIM) in collaboration with the Common Wealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Ove Arup and Woods Bagot Architects. He has been principal investigator of four CRC-CI research projects including ‘Business Drivers for BIM’, ‘Mobilising Construction’, ‘eBusiness Adoption in Construction’ and ‘Automated BIM Estimator’. He is currently RMIT Project Leader for the CRC-CI BIM National Guidelines and Case Studies.

He is currently supervising various Masters Theses and two PhDs. Guillermo is a Conjoint Academic to the Singapore Institute of Management, Singapore and the University of Newcastle, Australia.

[Next: Publications]

EXPLORE Programs & courses

Students

Research

Industry

Alumni

Future students International students How to apply Entrance requirements Fees Scholarships

Login to myRMIT Study resources Administration Student services Get involved

Focus areas Research Institutes Postgraduate programs Partnerships Fellowships Publications

Workforce development Work placements R & D consultancy Employing graduates

News Events Special offers Giving to RMIT

About RMIT Learning & teaching Colleges & schools Campuses & maps Employment News

INTERACT WITH RMIT Copyright © 2012 RMIT University Disclaimer Privacy Accessibility Website feedback ABN 49 781 030 034 CRICOS provider number: 00122A Print version Open Universities Australia

http://www.rmit.edu.au/staff/guillermo

15/03/2012