The Oracle Early March 2019

Page 1

NON-PROFIT ORG

Palo Alto Unified School District Henry M. Gunn High School 780 Arastradero Rd Palo Alto, CA 94306

Artist of the Month: Vivian Becker

U.S. Postage

PA I D

Permit #44 Palo Alto, Calif.

PG. 8 FEATURES

THEORACLE Henry M. Gunn High School

http://gunnoracle.com/

Friday, March 1, 2019 Volume 56, Issue 6

780 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA 94306

Parking issues on campus persist

Devon Lee Tech Editor

For the past two years, there has been a shortage of parking spaces. Currently, 40 spots are reserved for the construction workers, and with increasing class sizes, there are more student drivers vying for a parking spot than there are spots available. Finding parking in the morning is difficult, even for administrators. “Everybody is stressing about the parking piece, and it’s hard,” Principal Kathleen Laurence said. “I come, and the spot that’s for me is taken, and I drive and end up way down at the Village.” According to Laurence, a big contributing factor to this issue is the construction. “There are always concerns in that there’re more people who want to drive than we have spots,” she said. “However, when the new building opens up, then we [will] have more spots available.” Director of Student Activities Lisa Hall is aware of students parking illegally. “It does concern me that there are students who choose to drive to school and park on campus, even though they do not have a permit,” she said. “It is contributing to the problem of parking congestion and [is] unfair to students who have purchased permits.” The Palo Alto Police Department (PAPD) has been employed to combat illegal parking. “PAPD patrols the lot and issues tickets to cars that are parked in non-parking spaces or are parked without a permit,” Hall said. According to Laurence, the increase in student enrollment has added to the problem. “The other

piece to remember is that we have the bubble of enrollment coming through, so we have more kids for the next few years,” she said. “Therefore, we have more kids who want to drive.” Due to the parking shortage, some students have been forced to park on streets near Gunn, most commonly Georgia Ave. Junior Micheal Tao is one of the students that accommodates for his parking situation in this way. “I never parked in the parking lot because I started driving after semester one, and I live too close, so I could never get a parking pass,” he said. “I do have to leave earlier because the walk takes a good amount of time compared to biking. So I have to leave five to 10 minutes earlier than when I bike, but it’s worth it because it’s cold.” For students who live on Georgia, the increase in drivers has not been too difficult to live with. “I don’t really see it as much of a problem right now because I figure [if] they don’t have a spot to park in the actual parking lot, then they have to find somewhere else to park,” junior Ryan Wang said. “It’s more of an inconvenience than a large problem.” According to Secretary to the Principal Martha Elderon, she has not received any complaints from neighbors. Hall believes that one possible solution to the parking predicament is to find alternate modes of transportation to school. “The school could start with better messaging to the community about finding other ways to travel to school, encourage carpooling and to remind parents not to idle in parking spaces while waiting to pick up or drop off students at school,” she said.

Photo courtesy of Richard Yu

Title IX protocols consistent amidst local, national discussion Caroline Ro and Angela Wong Editor-in-Chief and Reporter

As ongoing sexual harassment allegations in the Gunn Robotics Team (GRT) were brought to court last month, the spotlight is being refocused onto the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) Title IX procedural requirements. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos’ proposals to grant more rights to the accused and shift the nature of Title IX regulations has also kept the law and its future on the national radar. Title IX was first passed in 1972 as a response to complaints against the lack of athletic scholarships, championships and funding for women’s teams in the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Title IX originally aimed to eliminate gender-based discrimination in athletics, but has since evolved into a law that encompasses “any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” Since 1972, the scope of Title IX has also expanded to cover not only gender discrimination in

athletics, but sexual harassment as well as gender-based discrimination against transgender students (primarily under the Obama administration). In 2016, a court case that charged a Palo Alto High School student for the assault of two female freshmen sparked controversy within the district and the community, as many felt as though the case was not handled according to the principles of Title IX. Upon receiving reports of this, the Office of Civil Rights (OCR)–a subagency of the Department of Education–confirmed that the case had not been handled in accordance with Title IX and subsequently began to work closely with PAUSD’s Board Policy Review Committee, staff members and a lawyer specializing in Title IX to improve the district’s approach to Title IX cases. The result of this collaboration was a revised board policy regarding the scope and definition of sexual assault, along with a new uniform complaint procedure for students and employees to report Title IX violations. Because the new board policy was created in conjunction with the OCR, it was written to closely reflect the standards placed by Title IX and

was confirmed by the OCR to be legally sound. “After it was written, we forwarded it to OCR and they looked over and said, ‘Yes, we approve of this. This is exactly the policy you should be having,’” School Board President Jennifer DiBrienza said. Since this revision, there have been several local and national incidents that have prompted many to question the future of PAUSD’s Title IX policies. Most recently, on Jan. 24, a petition was filed with the Santa Clara County Superior Court alleging that PAUSD had mishandled her sexual harassment case, which began as a Uniform Title IX complaint. The petition requested the reinstatement of a previous directive issued by PAUSD in November 2018 and limited student's interactions with another student who was found to have sexually harassed her. On Jan. 18, the restrictions placed by this directive were loosened by the district. The petition stated that this decision “unconstitutionally deprives [the victim] of her right to equal access to education,” and that PAUSD “is essentially asking (the girl) to make an impossible choice Title IX—p.4 — to choose either her safety or her


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
The Oracle Early March 2019 by The Oracle - Issuu