[SPORTS]
[ENTERTAINMENT]
Swim team prepares for new season
The Mystery of Edwin Drood lets the audience choose
p. 27
Volume 45 Issue 6
Henry M. Gunn High School 780 Arastradero Road Palo Alto, CA 94306 Palo Alto Unified School District
NON-PROFIT ORG U.S. Postage
PA I D
Permit #44 Palo Alto, Calif.
p. 19
http://gunn.pausd.org/oracle
Monday, March 16, 2009
780 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA 94306
CUTTING OUR SPENDING California budget finally passed after months of stalemate Sarah-Jean Zubair Copy Editor
After an all-night session of compromise and concessions, the California Senate passed a new state budget at 4:50 a.m. on Feb. 19. Republican Senator Abel Maldonado cast the deciding vote, allowing the budget to pass with the necessary majority vote of 27 to 12. Maldonado, while denouncing the budget as “ugly” and something that “takes a lot away,” voted for its passage with the consideration that the state of California is in dire need of economic reform. “For many Californians, this budget is a real life and death situation,” Maldonado said in a press conference. “This budget is about shared pain and shared sacrifices.” Before the budget’s passage, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger had to declare a fiscal emergency and lay off 10,000 state employees. Lawmakers stated that without a new budget, another 10,000 workers would have to be laid off, and public works projects, like construction, would have to be postponed. Additionally, President Barack Obama placed an ultimatum on the budget: the state of California would not receive federal
stimulus money unless a state budget was passed. The budget, which would increase taxes, faced opposition from Republican senators who claimed the Democratic legislative majority was using the state’s financial problems as an excuse to continue excessive spending and raise taxes. Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer admitted to the budget’s imperfections, but urged Republican senators to overlook them for the sake of the Californian people. “We have to put aside all this ego and put the people of California first,” Boxer said during the stalemate. “The people of California do not deserve the fate they will receive if it is not passed.” Unlike prior legislation for temporary relief from the current financial crisis, the recently passed budget addresses the entire $42 billion state deficit with tax increases and state spending reductions. $14.9 billion in spending cuts will be made primarily in more costly spending fields, especially education. Principal Noreen Likins feels that the budget is completely flawed in that respect. “Any budget that makes cuts in funding for education is not good for California,” she said. “It puts education in jeopardy.
We shouldn’t have kids pay the price for the state’s failure to balance a budget.” Likins stated that the spending cuts may affect students and teachers in negative ways. “Students won’t see any impact in the 2008-2009 school year,” she said. “The PAUSD [Palo Alto Unified School District] has been financially savvy, so there is enough money in the reserve to maintain the schools for a while. There has been and will be tightening in terms of the district budget. But people just don’t know what is going to happen.” Some school districts with less funding have resorted to laying off teachers and staff to save money, and cutting art and sports programs out of their curriculums. Likins says that PAUSD has not had to resort to that yet. But in years to follow, changes for more financial prudence may include slightly larger class sizes and decreases in employee hiring. “The last time the property tax revenue amount per student was so low [in the 2003-2004 school year], there were some lay-offs in this district,” Likins said. “Anticipated cuts may reduce our ability to staff at the same levels next year. But you can’t be certain about what will happen in the future.”
TA grading policies reinforced, revamped Wen Yi Chin and Joyce Liu
Sports Editor & Features Editor
During the January staff meeting, Principal Noreen Likins informed teachers about a more formal and updated teacher’s assistant (TA) policy. The issue with the TA policy was brought into the light when a TA had access to a teacher’s grade book, according to Math Instructional Supervisor Jeanne Beck. “The teacher was open and trusting and the TA had the teacher’s permission [to enter grades into the grade book],” Likins said. “But even the suggestion of possible misconduct puts us into a difficult situation.” “It’s an unfortunate situation that would not have occured if there were more boundaries,” Assistant Principal Phil Winston said. Winston began to investigate the situation when students made allegations about “buying” grades. “We take it very seriously and try to move as expeditiously as possible,” he said. Through his investigation, Winston was not able to find proof to verify the claims. “We were not able to confirm that grades were changed with respect to money,” Winston said. “We did not find that grades were changed or that tests were graded with bias. There was no evidence to substantiate the rumors. If somebody brought a blank lab with an A on it, that would be substantial evidence.” According to Winston, there was no first person information. The students who
alleged that unfair grading had occurred were always talking about something that happened to their friends. “Such situations can create a lot of gossip, which can amplify the situation,” physics teacher Claudia Winkler said. “And they’re not even true because they are taken out of context.” During the investigation, the administrators looked at graded tests, but did not find any suspicious grades. The administrators also had multiple meetings and long conversations with the student and teacher involved as well as the student’s parents. “We’re confident that we did a thorough job,” Winston said. “There were no facts that grades were changed and exchanged, although the decision was made that the student would not TA anymore in the best interest of everyone.” Nonetheless, this incident brought the TA policy into attention. “It’s not an issue until it’s an issue,” Winston said. “This issue reminded us that the situation needed adjustment. It’s a problem when the TAs don’t understand the boundaries or if the teachers don’t implement the boundaries. Before this incident, I don’t think the boundaries were very clear.” Likins agreed. “It is our duty and responsibility to protect students’ privacy,” she said. “It’s not okay for TAs to have access to grades. It is okay for a TA to grade multiple choice, if the student is TA POLICY—p.2
paper or plastic?
Twenty-five cent tax proposed Henry Liu
Jon Proctor
Forum Editor
In April, the Santa Clara Country recycling and waste reduction commission will vote on a proposal to implement a 25-cent fee on singleuse carry out bags county wide. If passed, the county will start enforcing the fee on Oct. 1, which aims to offset the full economic and environmental cost of the bags. Proponents of the measure argue that a fee will reduce the consumption of single-use carryout bags and will encourage consumers to bring their own. “Everyone knows it’s a good idea to use reusable bags, but not many people have a reason to remember,” Gunn Green Team president senior Emmiliese von Clemm said. “A fee would add the incentive people need to bring their own bags.” Residents against the ban counter that the fee will not have its intended effect. “Global warming isn’t caused by plastic bags,” senior Joseph Welch said. “There are more pressing issues that deserve attention such as increasing the gas mileage of cars and finding alternative sources of energy.” While reducing plastic bag waste alone may
not end global warming, assistant student chair for the Gunn Green team, senior Justin Kahn, believes it’s a step in the right direction. “Papermills dump dangerous chemicals into rivers and plastic industries use corrosive chemicals which harm the environment,” he said. In a statement regarding the ordinance, Elizabeth Constantino, Manager of the Integrated Waste Management Division for Santa Clara county, pointed out that 60 percent of the litter found in Bay Area creeks is plastic. “There is too much waste in our society,” Palo Alto resident June Liu said. Other opponents of the ordinance believe that an extra tax on bags could hurt consumers, especially in such a troubled economy. According to www.stopthesantaclaracobagtax.com, a website opposed to the measure and sponsored by the Progressive Bag Affiliates of the American Chemistry Council, “This new bag tax ignores the current crisis in our economy. The new tax increases costs on families while creating a new government bureaucracy.” Some also believe that this tax could unfairly tax the poor. “Rich people can just ignore the tax, but the poor will be hurt by it,” Welch said. BAG TAX—p.4