South Africa’s Children
A Review of Equity and Child Rights
South Africa’s Children A Review of Equity and Child Rights
Acknowledgements • This Report has been prepared under the guidance of Commissioner Lindiwe Mokate, Judith Cohen, Cameron Jacobs, Pandelis Gregoriou, Ekanem Okon from the South African Human Rights Commission and George Laryea-Adjei, Bjorn Gelders and André Viviers from UNICEF South Africa.
South Africa’s Children – A Review of Equity and Child Rights March 2011
• Bjorn Gelders from UNICEF South Africa conducted the technical collation and analysis of the data through an equity and child rights lens. • Various specialists at UNICEF South Africa provided valuable feedback. Viv Barnes edited and managed the production of this Report under tight timeframes, with the assistance of Mary Luce.
This review was undertaken by the South African Human Rights Commission and UNICEF South Africa
© South African Human Rights Commission/UNICEF This publication is intended to support everybody who works in the child rights field in South Africa. All care has been taken to ensure that the information provided is correct and original sources have been indicated for reference and verification. With an identification of the South African Human Rights Commission and UNICEF as source, the document may be freely quoted, reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and translated, in part or in whole, but not for sale nor for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. Original sources should be acknowledged where indicated in the publication.
Obtainable free of charge from: South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) Website: http://www.sahrc.org.za UNICEF South Africa. Website: http://www.unicef.org/southafrica Cover photographs Top row, left and centre, © UNICEF/Giacomo Pirozzi; right, UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker. Middle row, left, UNICEF/Giacomo Pirozzi; right, UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker. Bottom, UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker. Design and typesetting Handmade Communications d S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Childhood should be a happy time for all children. It should be a time when children have opportunities to grow, learn and develop; receive love and care; play freely and be active; feel safe and protected; be healthy; and be listened to when they share their views on matters that are important to them. Our investments in our children today will reap the fruits of social justice and advanced human capital in decades to come. It is a wise and sustainable investment. The South African Constitution provides a national blueprint of a society that respects the equality and dignity of every person – children and adults alike. It safeguards social, economic and cultural rights, as well as the civil rights and freedoms of adults and children, and particularly provides for additional rights that apply only to children in Section 28. Thus, children have a special place in our constitution. The Ministry for Women, Children and People with Disabilities is committed to create an enabling environment to ensure the facilitation of constitutional obligations, policies and legislative frameworks to realise all children’s rights. We have noted with pride that our democracy has made significant progress over the past years in creating a better South Africa for children. However, we also acknowledge that there are still many challenges that our children, their caregivers and communities face today. My ministry is in particular committed to working with other ministers and departments, and other partners, to ensure that no child is left behind. We need to make sure that girls and boys are afforded and experience equal opportunities from birth, at home, in school and in career choices; that violence against children is eradicated at its roots in our society; that children in rural and urban areas have the same access to resources while they grow up; that every child eligible for government support receives such support; that every child, no matter where she or he is born or lives, has the same chances to survive and thrive, and live healthily; that children with disabilities experience a society that values them and respects their rights; and that we make every effort to listen to our children. As a country we have ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child as well as the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, which shows our commitment to making sure that we meet international and regional standards in the realisation of child rights. Linked to the aforementioned are our commitments made by also ratifying the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities, as these are also intrinsically linked to the full realisation of child rights. This publication of the South African Human Rights Commission shows the importance of working together and forming partnerships for the realisation of all rights for all children, and the importance of looking at the realisation of child rights through an equity lens. It is important for us to hold hands and work with each other, as together, we can create a country where children feel safe, protected, cared for and free. Ms Lulu Xingwana, MP Minister for Women, Children and People with Disabilities
Foreword by Minister for Women, Children and People with Disabilities
Message by Commissioner Lindiwe Mokate, South African Human Rights Commission
The South African Constitution and much of our legislation addressing children’s needs is regarded as world class, providing eloquent, explicit and more than satisfactory guarantees of the rights of children. These national laws reflect the spirit of all the relevant international instruments which have been ratified by South Africa. However, as this publication demonstrates, the unfortunate reality is that there are still many children in South Africa whose basic rights are yet to be realised. There is an enormous gap between those children who live in poverty and those who live in affluence. Children do not choose the circumstances they find themselves in. Efficient and effective service delivery could go a long way towards closing this gap. As a nation we all have a responsibility to ensure that government, which has the primary responsibility to promote and protect these children’s rights, delivers on its mandate. As one of the principles for effective implementation of human rights, equity demands that government-funded programmes and services specifically address the needs of all children and ensure that they enjoy the right to equality of opportunity in life. More attention should be given to children’s meaningful participation in the decisions taken about their lives to ensure that the initiatives taken truly address their needs and have the desired impact. It is important that we are constantly reminded that those of us who are tasked with the responsibility of providing services to our children are not merely involved in an act of kindness but rather the delivery of inalienable human rights to children. It is my hope that this publication will be used as a reference text to assess the state of South African children to date, address the gaps in policies and service delivery programmes, and project the way forward to improve the situation of children, especially vulnerable children. The inequalities in the provision of and access to basic needs have been graphically represented in the text, to give users a pictorial view of the discrepancies that exist. I have no doubt that this publication is a valuable resource to everyone who works towards fulfilling our constitutional promise of achieving equality and ensuring human dignity. Commissioner Lindiwe Mokate South African Human Rights Commission
On 20 November 1989, world leaders came together in the General Assembly to adopt the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Since then, the Convention has become the most ratified human rights treaty in history. The Convention underscores the accountability of governments, civil society, parents and the international community to fulfil their obligations towards the realisation of the rights of children, and to ensure that these rights remain inalienable, integral and indivisible. There can be no doubt that the Convention has transformed the way we view children today. It has set in motion a process of social change, building the foundation for a world where all rights for all children can be realised – the rights to survival, development, protection and participation. South Africa ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1995. The rights of children are entrenched in, and protected by, the Bill of Rights in the country’s Constitution. The Government of South Africa has put in place a forward-looking system of laws and programmes to ensure basic support for children. The country can be truly proud of its leadership in ensuring that laws are now fully aligned with the provisions of the Convention. Realising the rights of children is not only fundamental for their development and well-being, it is pivotal to creating the world envisioned by the Millennium Declaration – a world of peace, equity, security, freedom, respect for the environment and shared responsibility. In short, a world fit for children. Significant efforts have been made by countries across the world towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). But it is increasingly evident that our progress is uneven in many key areas. In the global push to achieve the MDGs, we are leaving behind millions of the world’s most disadvantaged, vulnerable and marginalised children. Deprivations of children’s rights are disproportionately concentrated among the poorest populations within countries. This statistical report demonstrates that the situation is no different in South Africa. Mounting evidence has shown that the Millennium Development Goals and other commitments to children can only be fully realised if we look at development through the prism of equity. Concretely, this means that all programmes and policies should seek to understand and address the root causes of inequity so that all children, particularly those who suffer the worst deprivations, have access to education, health care, sanitation, clean water, protection, and other services necessary for their survival, growth, and development. Aida Girma UNICEF South Africa Country Representative
Message by Aida Girma, UNICEF Country Representative
Table of Contents
Acronyms
1
Executive Summary
2
Demography of South Africa’s Children
8
Summary View of Inequity Among Children – How Far Have We Come?
12
Summary Report Card on Equity in the Realisation of Child Rights in South Africa
18
Children’s Rights to an Adequate Standard of Living
20
Status of Child Poverty and Hunger
20
The Right to Social Security
24
The Right to Housing
26
The Right to Water and Sanitation
28
Children’s Rights to Life and Basic Health
30
The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health
30
The Right to Food and Nutrition
33
Children and AIDS
36
Children’s Rights to Early Childhood Development and Education
40
The Right to Early Childhood Development
40
The Right to Education
41
Children’s Rights to a Family Environment and Alternative Care
50
The Right to Parental or Family Care
50
The Right to Alternative Care in the Absence of Family Care
52
The Right to be Protected from all Forms of Violence
54
Children’s Rights to Special Protection
56
The Right to Special Protection When in Conflict with the Law
56
The Right to Special Protection in Situations of Exploitation
58
The Civil Rights and Freedoms of Children
60
The Right to Birth Registration
60
The Right to Protection From Corporal Punishment and Other Cruel or Degrading Forms of Punishment
61
Technical Note
62
References
64
Database on Child Rights Indicators
67
Acronyms
AIDS
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
GPI
Gender Parity Index
ART
Antiretroviral Treatment
GT
Gauteng
ARV
Antiretrovirals
HebB
Hepatitis B Vaccine
BCG
Bacille Calmette Guerin (vaccine for TB)
Hib3
Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Vaccine
BMI
Body Mass index
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
CD4
Cluster of Differentiation 4 (a glycoprotein that acts as receptor for HIV in humans)
HSRC
Human Sciences Research Council
CDC
Centres for Disease Control and Prevention
IES
Income and Expenditure Survey UN Inter-Agency Group on Child Mortality Estimation
Reconstruction and Development Programme
Care Dependency Grant
IGME
RDP
CDG
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
Infant Mortality Rate
South Africa
CEDAW
IMR
SA
JCPS
Justice Crime Prevention and Security
CRC
Convention on the Rights of the Child
KZN
KwaZulu-Natal
SABSSM South Africa HIV/AIDS Behavioural Risks, Sero-status and Media Impact Survey
CSG
Child Support Grant
LIM
Limpopo
SACMEQ Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality
DCS
Department of Correctional Services
MDG
Millennium Development Goal
SAHRC
DHB
District Health Barometer
MMR
Maternal Mortality Ratio
DHIS
District Health Information System
MP
Mpumalanga
SAIMDC South African Index of Multiple Deprivation for Children
DHS
Demographic and Health Survey
MRC
Medical Research Council
SALDRU Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit
DoE
Department of Education
MTCT
Mother-to-Child-Transmission
SAPS
South African Police Service
Department of Health
MTSF
Medium Term Strategic Framework
SASSA
South African Social Security Agency
DoHS
Department of Human Settlements
DPT
Vaccine against Diphtheria, Pertussis (whooping cough) and Tetanus
MWCPD Ministry of Women, Children and People with Disabilities
DRDLR
DoH
South African Human Rights Commission
SAVACG South African Vitamin A Consultative Group SAYP
Survey of Activities of Young People
SES
Socio-Economic Status
NC
Northern Cape
Department of Rural Development and Land Reform
NCHS
National Centre for Health Statistics
EC
Eastern Cape
NFCS
National Food Consumption Survey
ECD
Early Childhood Development
NIDS
National Income Dynamic Study
EDD
Economic Development Department
NT
National Treasury
EFA
Education for All
NW
North West
EPI
Expanded Programme on Immunisation
FCG
Foster Care Grant
OECD
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
FS
Free State
OVC
Orphans and Vulnerable Children
UNICEF
United Nations Children’s Fund
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
PMTCT
Prevention of Mother-to-Child-Transmission of HIV
WC
Western Cape
GER
Gross Enrolment Ratio
PPP
Purchasing Power Parity
WHO
World Health Organisation
GHS
General Household Survey
QLFS
Quarterly Labour Force Survey
YRBS
Youth Risk Behaviour Survey
SOCPEN Social Security Pension System Stats SA Statistics South Africa TFR
Total Fertility Rate
U5MR
Under-Five Mortality Rate
UN
United Nations
UNAIDS Joint United Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS
1
Executive Summary
Introduction South Africa is often called ‘A World in One Country’ because it displays a contrast between an advanced economy rivalling that of the developed world co-existing with another that has only the most basic infrastructure, and a variety of peoples and cultures that make up the South African ‘rainbow’ nation.1 There are some 49.9 million people in South Africa, with 18.6 million being children under the age of 18 years. Of these children, 85 per cent are Black African; 8 per cent are Coloured; 5 per cent are White; and 2 per cent are Indian/ Asian.2 The overall population is growing at 1.06 per cent per annum. Migration is an important demographic process in shaping the age structure and distribution of the population. The constitution recognises 11 official languages, namely Afrikaans, English, isiNdebele, isiXhosa, isiZulu, Sesotho sa Leboa, Sesotho, Setswana, siSwati, Tshivenda and Xitsonga. South Africa is divided into nine provinces, each with its own legislature, premier and executive councils. The South African economy is the largest on the continent of Africa with a GDP of US$493 billion (PPP) and a GDP per capita of US$10,135 (PPP) in 2008.3 Since 1994, it has recorded positive real GDP growth, except for 2009 when there was contraction by almost 2 per cent due to the global financial crisis. Unemployment is a major economic policy problem for the country.4 One in four working-age South Africans, some 4.5 million people, are unemployed (out of a total labour force of 17 million). Among young people aged 18 to 24 years, 41 per cent are not working and not in school. Other major development challenges include inequality, poverty and HIV and AIDS.
Methodology This report reflects an analysis of key indicators to assess the fulfilment of children’s rights in South Africa. Most of the data is derived from Statistics South Africa’s General Household Survey (GHS). The GHS is a household survey representative for the entire population of the country. It has been executed annually by Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) since 2002. It covers six broad areas, namely: education, health, social development, housing, household access to services and facilities, food security and agriculture. The report also incorporates data from other large-scale surveys, such as the National Food Consumption Survey and the National Antenatal Sentinel HIV Survey by the Department of Health, the National HIV Prevalence Survey by the Human Sciences Research Council, and the Youth Risk Behaviour Survey by the Medical Research Council. Furthermore, for selected indicators, the report draws on administrative data and information published in departmental annual reports. While South Africa is a relatively data-rich country, the lack of availability of pre-analysed disaggregated data poses a significant challenge to providing a complete picture of inequities in the fulfilment of child rights. Moreover, published statistics usually focus on the entire population or households, not specifically children. Additional analysis of the raw GHS 2009 dataset was therefore undertaken to calculate disaggregated, child-centred statistics. Person 1 2 3 4
2 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
South African Government Information (2011). ‘About South Africa’, http://www.info.gov.za/aboutsa/index.htm. Statistics South Africa (2010). Mid-year Population Estimates, 2010. OECD (2010). Stats Extract. OECD (2010). Economic Survey of South Africa.
weights provided by Stats SA were applied in the analyses to give estimates by province, population group and gender. Data were also disaggregated by income quintile using total household per capita income as the ranking variable.
Equity and Child Rights Equity is rooted in the principles of universality, non-discrimination, indivisibility and participation that underpin the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and other major human rights instruments. The CRC guarantees the fundamental rights of every child, regardless of gender, race, religious beliefs, income, physical attributes, geographical location or other status. Equity is also one of the founding principles of the South African Constitution. Significant progress has been made since the end of apartheid in 1994 in fulfilling the rights of children in South Africa. New laws, progressive public spending and reorganisation of administrative systems have contributed to accelerating the fulfilment of rights. For example, millions of children are benefiting from the Child Support Grant through the extension of the age of eligibility and an extensive outreach programme by the state. Recent changes in government’s response to HIV have also been far reaching, including state provision of treatment for all HIV-infected infants at government-run health facilities, and provision of treatment and care to HIV-positive pregnant women earlier in their pregnancies to prevent new paediatric infections. Near-universal access to primary education has been achieved and government is increasingly focusing on the improvement of the quality of education. The Children’s Act and the Child Justice Act provide a solid foundation for advancing child protection in the country. Altogether, progressive policies by the state in the last sixteen years or so have led to the expansion of many services for children, especially poor children. Nevertheless, the existence of large disparities in children’s access to some of the essentials of life points to a critical policy challenge, a challenge that requires a more accelerated drive to redress inequities from the past as well as confronting the substantial barriers that the poorest children still face today. The report is structured in three parts. Part 1 on the demographic profile of children in the country shows that almost two out of five South Africans are children, that is, under the age of 18. About 7 million of these children live in the poorest 20 per cent of households. Part 2 of the report presents a summary view of inequities in the fulfilment of child rights. South Africa is one of the most unequal countries in the world and income inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, has increased since 1993. In South Africa, compared to a child growing up in the richest income quintile, a child in the poorest quintile is two times less likely to have access to adequate sanitation and water; two times less likely to be exposed to early childhood development programmes; three times less likely to complete secondary education; seventeen times more likely to experience hunger; and twenty-five times less likely to be covered by a medical scheme. Racial disparities remain strong. For example, compared to a White child, a Black African child is nearly 18 times more likely to grow up in poverty. Moreover, the spatial distribution of multiple child deprivation still overlaps to a large extent to the location of the former homelands. The country has nevertheless made good progress in reducing gender inequality. Gender parity has been achieved in primary and secondary education. There is also little difference between boys and girls for many child outcomes. 3
Some gender gaps, however, remain. Children in female-headed households, for example, are more likely to experience hunger than children in male-headed households. They are also less likely to have access to adequate sanitation and water. Moreover, female youth are disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic and gender-based violence remains widespread in the country. Part 3 of the report presents wide-ranging data on the realisation of specific child rights in the country. The various rights are clustered into six groups: (1) the right to an adequate standard of living; (2) the right to life and basic health; (3) the right to early childhood development and education; (4) the right to a family environment and alternative care; (5) the right to special protection; and (6) the civil rights and freedoms of children. Each right is accompanied by a brief description of the relevant articles in the CRC and the South African Constitution; related national targets as articulated in service delivery agreements for government’s 12 outcomes for the MTSF 2009–2014 period; and international goals and targets, particularly the Millennium Development Goals. Children’s right to an adequate standard of living
Child poverty was reduced by 13 per cent between 2004 and 2008. However, despite this positive progress income poverty remains very much a part of inequality in South Africa and a key determinant of children’s standard of living. Some 11.9 million children (64 per cent of all children) live in poverty. Just two provinces, Gauteng and Western Cape, have child poverty levels below the national average. If the Vision 2014 target is to be met, child poverty has to decrease from the current level of 64 per cent to 37 per cent in 2014. Unemployment is a key constraint to overcoming child poverty. Overall, nearly four out of ten children live in households with no employed household members. Among the poorest, seven of out ten children live in households with no economically active members. Reported hunger among children declined from 31 per cent in 2002 to 15 per cent in 2007. However, progress is at risk of being reversed as data shows an increase in child hunger to 22 per cent in 2009. Children in the poorest households and female-headed households are significantly more likely to experience hunger. There are also wide disparities across provinces. The evidence shows that there has been significant progress in fulfilling children’s right to social security, particularly through the dramatic expansion of social grants. This has contributed to the moderate decline in child poverty. The eligibility age range for the Child Support Grant has gradually been extended from 0–6 years in 1999 to 0–17 years from 2012 onwards. Yet, some 2.1 million children eligible for the Child Support Grant were not receiving it in 2008. Lack of documentation continues to be the biggest barrier to accessing the Child Support Grant. About 2.8 million children (15 per cent of all children) have been reached with a RDP or state-subsidised dwelling. Nevertheless, children from middle-income households appear to have received most benefits from RDP or statesubsidised housing. Some 1.7 million children (9 per cent of all children) still live in informal housing such as shacks in backyards or squatter settlements. Children from the poorest households are less likely to live in formal housing.
4 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Access to safe water and sanitation has improved over the past decade with 83 per cent of children having access to piped water on site or at public/neighbour’s tap, and access to adequate sanitation for children has improved from 47 per cent in 2002 to 64 per cent in 2009. Yet, almost 1.4 million children (8 per cent of all children) live in households that rely on rivers or streams as their main source of drinking water. In addition, nearly 1.5 million children (8 per cent of all children) live in households with no toilet facility at all. In fact, among children in the poorest households just 50 per cent have access to adequate sanitation. Children’s right to life and basic health
Data on the right to health presents a mixed picture. Access to health services appears to be high as nine out of ten births take place in health facilities. However, South Africa is not on track for meeting the health targets of the 2015 Millennium Development Goals. Under-five mortality is at the same level it was in 1990. Maternal mortality has increased by 80 per cent since 1990. Each year in South Africa, around 4,300 mothers die due to complications of pregnancy and child birth; 20,000 babies are stillborn and another 23,000 die before they reach one month of age. In total, some 75,000 children die before their fifth birthday annually. This toll of over 270 maternal and child deaths every day is mainly due to HIV and AIDS and poor implementation of existing packages of care. The data shows that malnutrition among children continues and wide disparities persist across provinces. One in five children are stunted which is a consequence of chronic nutritional deprivation. One in ten children are underweight. Close to 5 per cent of children suffer from wasting and face a markedly increased risk of death. Chronic undernutrition in early childhood results in diminished cognitive and physical development which puts children at a disadvantage for the rest of their lives. Micronutrient deficiencies, particularly vitamin A and iron deficiency, doubled between 1994 and 2005. The School Nutrition Programme nevertheless reaches 6 out of 10 children in public schools. HIV prevalence among children has decreased since 2002. Children’s access to antiretroviral therapy has gone up substantially in recent years, and around 100,000 children living with HIV are now receiving treatment. Yet, only 54 per cent of children needing antiretroviral therapy were receiving it in 2009, though this is expected to have increased because of new treatment guidelines which became effective in April 2010. Overall, there is need for a greater focus on the HIV-free survival among the children. Children’s right to early childhood development and education
Early childhood development (ECD) is crucial to children’s mental and emotional development and their readiness for school and life. There has been substantial progress in expanding enrolment in Grade R – from 15 per cent in 1999 to 60 per cent in 2009. Government subsidies have also given momentum to centre-based care for younger children, though at a much slower pace than Grade R. However overall, just 43 per cent of children under five are exposed to an ECD programme at home, a centre or elsewhere. Again, there are large disparities across provinces. There has been significant progress in the realisation of the right to education. Near-universal primary education has been achieved in all provinces and one in two learners in public schools receives free education. School attendance
5
among children has increased steadily in the past 15 years, but less so for older age groups, especially those eligible for secondary education. Nationwide some 582,000 children are out of secondary school. Lack of money and disability are major reasons why children are not attending school. Furthermore, children in the poorest households are nearly three times less likely to complete secondary schooling than children in the richest households. The quality of education is a major challenge in South Africa. Learners’ achievement in national and international assessments is generally poor. Children in the poorest households are more likely to repeat the same grade and tend to have lower achievement levels. Violence at school is also a barrier to quality education. About 27 per cent of high school learners feel unsafe at school while 16 per cent have been threatened with a weapon. Children’s right to a family environment and alternative care
In South Africa, just one in three children live with both biological parents. Overall, one in five children have lost one or both parents, though there are large differences between provinces. The AIDS epidemic is an important driver of the growing number of orphans. Some 1.9 million children have lost one or both parents due to AIDS. Poor children appear to be more likely to be deprived of parental care. South Africa has made significant strides in ensuring that children in need of alternative care are placed in appropriate alternative care options. Over 88,600 children were declared in need of care by a children’s court during 2009/10. These children can be placed in foster care, in a children’s home, in a school of industry, or back into the parents’ or guardians’ care under the supervision of a social worker. Orphaned and abandoned children may also be adopted. Close to 500,000 children live with foster parents and benefit from the Foster Child Grant, while the number of adoptions has increased to more than 5,850 annually. Approximately 13,250 children stay in registered child and youth care centres. Violence against children is pervasive in the country. Over 56,500 children were reported to be victims of violent crime in 2009/10, yet many more crimes remain unreported. People closest to them perpetrate the majority of cases of child sexual and physical abuse. Children’s right to special protection
The CRC and the South African Constitution afford special protection to children in conflict with the law and children in situations of exploitation. Approximately 33,000 children awaited trial in detention during 2008/09, either in correctional service facilities, secure care centres, places of safety or under home-based supervision. The number of children in correctional facilities has decreased substantially over the past years as an increasing number of children are placed in secure care centres or diverted from the mainstream criminal justice system by attending diversion programmes such as life skills or anger management programmes. Little data is available on children in situations of exploitation, such as child labour, child prostitution and trafficking. More than one in ten high school learners has taken at least one illegal narcotic drug or psychotropic substance.
6 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
The civil rights and freedoms of children
There has been good progress in realising children’s right to an identity. The proportion of births registered within the year of birth jumped from 25 percent in 1998 to 85 percent in 2009. There are, nonetheless, large provincial disparities and the lowest levels of birth registration continue to be in predominantly rural provinces. Corporal punishment is practised in many homes and schools. Children in the poorest households are five times more likely to experience corporal punishment at school than children in the richest households, though by law it is prohibited in schools.
Conclusion South Africa has made significant progress in fulfilling the rights of children. The country has one of the most progressive constitutions in the world, and a system of laws and programmes has been put in place to ensure basic support for children. The delivery of essential services has been expanded in significant ways to all groups of society since the end of apartheid. Yet, inequities in access to the essentials of life still exist, affecting in very strong ways how children access the opportunities that the country has for the fulfilment of their rights. Children in the poorest households appear to have benefited least from progress since the end of apartheid. The income situation of a child’s family, race, location and to a lesser degree gender, determine the extent of inequities in the fulfilment of children’s rights. Accelerating the reduction of inequities in the fulfilment of children’s rights is both a moral imperative and necessary condition for the total development of the country. As the evidence shows, the situation of children left behind in South Africa requires special attention from policy makers, attention that prioritises their rights in government programmes, budgets and monitoring systems. There is an urgent need for policy makers to move at a faster pace to redress inequities from the past as well as tackle the substantial barriers that the poorest children still face today. This report is a statistical publication. But behind every statistic is the life of a child – each one endowed with rights to survive, develop and reach his or her full potential, regardless of geographic location, race, income, gender or other status.
7
Limpopo 12%
5 – 9% 10 – 14% 15 – 20%
3,518,388
< 5%
North West 7%
Mpumalanga 8%
> 20%
Northern Cape 2%
1,814,404
Also see the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Article 2: … a child means every human being below the age of 18 years.
KwaZulu-Natal 23%
Free State 5%
Eastern Cape 15%
2,715,691
CRC, Article 1: … a child means every human being below the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier.
1,001,354
395,144
Rights
4,253,558
Gauteng 19%
Percentage distribution
1,426,930
Number of children
2,305,976
Number and percentage distribution of children (< 18 years) by province, 2010
1,217,832
Demography of South Africa’s Children
There are 18.6 million children in the country
Western Cape 10%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). Mid-year Population Estimates, 2010.
SA Constitution Section 28(3): … ‘child’ means a person under the age of 18 years.
South Africa’s population structure is skewed towards the young 37% of the population is below 18 years of age
Number of males and females by age group (population pyramid), 1996–2010
Age group
Number of females per age group
Number of males per age group
80+ 75–79 70–74 65–69 60–64 55–59 50–54 45–49 40–44 35–39 30–34 25–29 20–24 15–19 10–14 5–9 0–4 3,000
Year: 1996 Year: 2010
Source: Statistics South Africa (1996; 2010). Census 1996; Mid-year Population Estimates, 2010.
2,000
1,000
0 Thousands
8 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
1,000
2,000
3,000
85% of children are Black; 27% under 5 years of age; there are only slightly more boys than girls Percentage distribution of children in South Africa by age, population group and sex, 2010 2% 5% 8% 5,181,221
African/Black 15,816,906 0-4 years
27%
8,347,353
Coloured 1,461,848
5-9 years
45%
Indian/Asian 355,114
10-17 years
9,387,769
9,261,508
50.3%
49.7%
Female Male
White 1,015,410
85% 5,120,703 28%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). Mid-year Population Estimates, 2010.
1.07 million children were born in 2010 Number of births by province, 2010
250,000
235,330
158,490
164,580
Limpopo
Eastern Cape
177,675
150,000 95,705
100,000
80,320
80,830
North West
Mpumalanga
Š UNICEF/Rebecca Hearfield
Number of births
200,000
59,380 50,000 17,825 0
Northern Cape
Free State
Western Cape
Gauteng
KwaZuluNatal
Source: Actuarial Society of South Africa (2005). ASSA2003 Model.
D e m o g r a p h y o f S o u t h A f r i c a â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s C h i l d r e n 9
Fertility has declined from an average of 2,86 children per woman in 2001 to 2,38 children in 2010 Total fertility rate (TFR), 2001–2010 3.0 2.86
2.81
2.75
2.5
2.7
2.85
2.59
2.54
2.48
2.43
2.38
2007
2008
2009
2010
TFR
2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). Mid-year Population Estimates, 2010.
A child born in South Africa today will on average live for 53 years If born in Brazil, that child would have lived for 73 years
Average life expectancy at birth by sex and province for the period 2006–2011 70
Males Females
60 50
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Years
40 30
0
South Africa
Free State
KwaZuluNatal
North West
Mpumalanga
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). Mid-year Population Estimates, 2010.
1 0 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Eastern Cape
Northern Cape
Limpopo
Gauteng
60.8
57.6
58.7
55.9
58.0
55.0
54.9
53.5
53.1
51.3
51.6
50.3
50.5
47.5
50.2
49.1
48.4
46.2
54.3
10
52.2
20
Western Cape
South Africa’s children speak a wide diversity of languages Percentage distribution of children’s mother tongue, 2009
Children are more likely to live in poorer households Some 7 million children live in the poorest 20% of households while only 1.7 million children live in the richest 20% of households
Total number of children by household income quintile, 2009
8,000,000 7,000,000
9%
7%
10%
7.0
6,000,000 7%
5,000,000
11%
4.5
4,000,000 10% 3,000,000
2.9 2.4
2,000,000
17%
1.7
1,000,000
29%
0
Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Isizulu/Zulu Isixhosa/Xhosa Setswana/Tswana English Sepedi/Northern Sotho
Unspecified
1%
Isindebele/South Ndebele/North Ndebele
1%
Tshivenda/Venda
2%
Siswati/Swazi
3%
Xitsonga/Tsonga
3%
Sesotho/Southern Sotho/Sotho Afrikaans Other
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Note: The GHS only records in what language the interview with the household’s respondent was conducted. It is assumed this serves as a good proxy of the mother tongue of any child living in that household. Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
D e m o g r a p h y o f S o u t h A f r i c a ’s C h i l d r e n 1 1
Summary View of Inequity Among Children – How Far Have We Come?
South Africa is one of the most unequal countries in the world Gini coefficient by country in the world
Note: Gini coefficient is the most commonly used measure of inequality. The coefficient varies between 0, which reflects complete equality and 1, which indicates complete inequality (one person has all the income or consumption, all others have none).
GINI coefficient
Rights CRC, Article 2: States Parties shall respect and ensure the rights set forth in the present Convention to each child within their jurisdiction without discrimination of any kind, irrespective of the child’s or his or her parent’s or legal guardian’s race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, property, disability, birth or other status.
<.25
.45 - .49
.25 -.29
.50 - .54
.30 - .34
.55 - .59
.35 - .39
>.60
.40 - .44
No data Source: CIA (2009). The World Factbook 2009.
Income inequality has worsened since 1993 Gini coefficient for per capita income, 1993, 2000 and 2008
• Share of income of the bottom 40% of the population increased to at least 6.4%.
0.66
0.68
0.70
80 % share of income
• Gini coefficient reduced to 0.59.
0.60
Gini coefficient
Key targets by 2014:
Percentage share of total reported household income per capita by quintile, 2008
0.75
National targets EDD/NT Service Delivery Agreement, Output 4.1: Faster and sustainable inclusive growth.
The poorest 20% of the population earns only 1.8% of total national household income
0.45
0.30
60 50 40 30 20
0.15
10 0.00
1993
2000
2008
Source: OECD (2010). Trends in South African income distribution and poverty since the fall of apartheid. Analysis of SALDRU 1993, IES 2000 and NIDS 2008 data sets.
1 2 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
74
70
0
7 2
4
Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
14
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Source: Finn, Leibbrandt and Woolard (2009). Income and Expenditure Inequality: Analysis of the NIDS Wave 1 Dataset.
Compared to a child growing up in the richest quintile, a child in the poorest quintile is … 2 times less likely to have access to adequate sanitation and water
2 times less likely to be exposed to early childhood development programmes
Percentage of children living in households with access to adequate sanitation; piped (tap) water in dwelling or on site, 2009
Percentage of children under 5 exposed to ECD programmes, 2009
Adequate sanitation Piped (tap) water on site
84 72
60 40
59
85
73
57
50 40
Poorest 20% Second 20%
40
40 35
55
50 41
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
36
30
24
25 20
15
15
9
10
10
5
0
0
Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
2 Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
3 times less likely to complete secondary education
25 times less likely to be covered by a medical scheme
Percentage of youth (20–24 years old) who have completed secondary education, 2009
Percentage of children covered by a medical aid scheme, 2009
80
80
74
60 50
50
Percentage
Percentage
60
38
40 30
26
29
50 40
20
10
10 Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
29
30
20
0
71
70
70
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
33
30
44
20
20 0
64
60
94 Percentage
80 Percentage
95
70
Percentage of children living in households experiencing hunger, 2009
Percentage
100
17 times more likely to experience hunger
0
9 3
3
Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Summary View of Inequity Among Children – How Far Have We Come? 13
Racial disparities remain strong. Compared to a White child, a Black African child is … 18 times more likely to live in poverty
Percentage of children living in poverty, 2008 80 71
2 times less likely to have access to adequate sanitation and water
Percentage of children under 5 exposed to ECD programmes, 2009
Percentage of children living in households with access to adequate sanitation; piped (tap) water in dwelling or on site, 2009
80 70
50
60 37
40 30 20
0
Coloured
Indian
42
Piped (tap) water on site
80
54 40
30
60
96
95
100
99
99
97
Adequate sanitation 58
53
40 20
10
4 Black/African
40
100
20
11
10
50
69
Percentage
60
Percentage
Child poverty rate (%)
70
1.5 times less likely to be exposed to early childhood development programmes
0
White
African/Black
Coloured
Indian/Asian
0
White
African/Black
Coloured
Indian/Asian
White
Note: The poverty line is set at the 40th percentile of household per capita income. Source: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town (2010). South African Child Gauge 2009/2010. Analysis of Stats SA General Household Survey 2008.
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
12 times more likely to experience hunger
2 times less likely to complete secondary education
Percentage of children living in households experiencing hunger or at risk of hunger, 2009 40 35
11
80
82
81
Indian/Asian
White
8
25
24 20
Percentage
Percentage © UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Experience hunger
21
15 10
African/Black
Coloured
60 45 40
36
20
4
5
8
3 2
Indian/Asian
White
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
1 4 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
100
At risk of hunger
30
0
Percentage of youth (20–24 years old) who have completed secondary education, 2009
0
African/Black
Coloured
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
The spatial distribution of multiple child deprivation still overlaps to a large extent to the location of the former homelands South African Index of Multiple Child Deprivation at municipal level, 2007
Index of Multiple Deprivation for Children
Former Homelands
Most Deprived (47)
Indians
4
(47)
Coloureds
3
(48)
Blacks
2
(47)
Whites
Least Deprived (48)
Venda
Black Homeland
Lebowa
Excluded Areas (20)
KwaNdebele Boputhatswana Swaziland
Lesotho
Transkei
Note: The SAIMDC 2007 was constructed on the basis of a model of child deprivation comprising a series of uni-dimensional domains of deprivation which each contain one or more indicators relating to that domain of deprivation. The domains were each constructed as a separate domain index and then combined into a single measure of multiple deprivation – the SAIMDC 2007. Five domains of deprivation were produced using the 2007 Community Survey to form the SAIMDC 20072: Income and Material Deprivation; Employment Deprivation; Education Deprivation; Biological Parent Deprivation; Living Environment Deprivation. Source: Wright, G, Noble, M, Barnes, H and Noble, S (2009). The South African Index of Multiple Deprivation for Children 2007 at Municipality Level. Pretoria: Department of Social Development.
Summary View of Inequity Among Children – How Far Have We Come? 15
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Ciskei
The country has made good progress in reducing gender inequalities. Gender parity has been achieved in primary and secondary education and for many child outcomes there is little difference between boys and girls Nevertheless, compared to children living in male-headed households, children in female-headed households are … 1.5 times more likely to experience hunger
Percentage of children living in households experiencing hunger or at risk of hunger, 2009
1.3 times less likely to have access to adequate sanitation and water
Percentage of children living in households with access to adequate sanitation; piped (tap) water in dwelling or on site, 2009 80
40 35
At risk of hunger
12 70
Experience hunger
60
25
9
27
20 15
17
10
© UNICEF/Giacomo Pirozzi
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Piped (tap) water on site 58 52
30
5 Female-headed HH
68
40
20
Male-headed HH
70
50
10
0
1 6 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Percentage
Percentage
30
Adequate sanitation
0
Male-headed HH
Female-headed HH
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Women are disproportionately affected by the HIV and AIDS epidemic Female youth are 3.5 times more likely to be HIV positive than their male counterparts HIV prevalence (%) among youth 15–24 years old by sex, 2002; 2005 and 2008
Gender-based violence remains widespread Sexual offences against children reported to the police, 2006/07–2009/10
30,000
20 Males Females
25,000
17
15
Number
Percentage
10
22,124
20,000
14 12
27,417 25,428 20,141
15,000 10,000
6 4
0
2002
5,000
4
2005
2008
Source: Shisana O, et al. (2009). South African national HIV prevalence, incidence, behaviour and communication survey 2008: A turning tide among teenagers? Cape Town: HSRC Press.
0
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
Source: South African Police Service (2010). Crime Situation in South Africa.
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
5
Summary View of Inequity Among Children – How Far Have We Come? 17
Summary Report Card on Equity in the Realisation of Child Rights in South Africa Selected key indicators
National average
Province EC
FS
GT
KZN
LIM
MP
NW
NC
WC
Ratio of highest to lowest value
Children’s Rights to an Adequate Standard of Living Children living in poverty (%, 2008)
64
72
66
42
71
83
69
70
70
37
2.3
Children experiencing hunger (%, 2009)
22
23
38
15
30
10
26
25
21
17
3.8
Children living in formal housing (%, 2009)
72
46
81
80
58
90
86
88
85
80
2.0
Children living in households with piped water in dwelling or on site (%, 2009)
60
31
91
91
45
39
65
55
70
92
3.0
Children living in households with adequate sanitation (%, 2009)
64
51
77
88
59
37
43
64
80
94
2.6
Births taking place in public health facilities (%, 2008/09)
87
71
84
97
83
90
84
84
89
98
1.4
Under-five mortality rate (deaths per 1,000 live births, 2009)
62
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Full immunisation coverage among children under one year (%, 2008/09)*
90
84
90
102
85
84
72
89
93
104
1.4
Prevalence of stunting among children 1–9 years (%, 2005)
18
18
28
17
15
24
18
15
28
12
2.3
Prevalence of underweight among children 1–9 years (%, 2005)
9
8
14
6
5
12
11
12
38
8
7.7
Prevalence of wasting among children 1–9 years (%, 2005)
5
4
3
3
1
4
8
3
19
12
14.7
HIV prevalence among pregnant women (%, 2009)
29
28
30
30
40
21
35
30
17
17
2.3
HIV prevalence among children 2–14 years (%, 2008)
2.5
2.1
4.1
2.2
2.8
2.5
3.8
3.2
2.3
1.1
3.7
Children under five years of age exposed to an ECD programme (%, 2009)
43
38
67
59
33
35
42
43
44
38
2.0
Children of primary school age attending an educational institution (%, 2009)
99
98
99
99
99
99
98
98
99
99
1.0
Youth (20–24 years old) who have completed primary education (%, 2009)
92
87
94
94
92
92
94
91
88
96
1.1
Children of secondary school age attending an educational institution (%, 2009)
89
87
90
92
87
94
90
87
83
82
1.2
Children’s Rights to Life and Basic Health
Children’s Rights to Early Childhood Development and Education
Youth (20–24 years old) who have completed secondary education (%, 2009)
40
26
40
53
42
26
37
37
32
50
2.0
Grade 6 average mathematics score in SACMEQ assessment (2007)
495
469
492
545
485
447
476
503
499
566
1.2
Children living with both biological parents (%, 2009)
32
21
34
50
25
23
28
30
31
52
2.4
Children who have lost one or both parents (%, 2009)
19
25
23
13
25
18
22
19
15
8
3.0
Cases of neglect and ill-treatment reported to the police (per 100,000 population, 2009/10)
8
5
16
10
4
4
5
8
17
16
4.1
12
12
8
9
13
13
14
10
13
11
1.8
Birth registered within year of birth (%, 2005)**
72
66
75
81
62
67
70
67
82
97
1.6
Children attending school experiencing corporal punishment (%, 2009)
17
25
20
12
24
15
8
13
6
3
8.1
Children’s Rights to a Family Environment and Alternative Care
Children’s Rights to Special Protection High school learners who have ever taken drug like heroin, mandrax, sugars, tik (%, 2008) The Civil Rights and Freedoms of Children
1 8 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Better off than the national average
Worse off than the national average
Equal or close to the national average (+/- 1 percentage point)
Gender
Population group
Source
Poorest 20%
Richest 20%
Ratio of richest to poorest
Male
Female
Ratio of male to female
Black / African
Coloured
Indian / Asian
White
Ratio of White to Black
–
–
–
–
–
–
71
37
11
4
0.1
GHS 2008
33
2
0.1
22
23
0.96
24
21
5
2
0.1
GHS 2009
61
98
1.6
72
72
1.00
68
88
100
100
1.5
GHS 2009
40
94
2.3
60
60
1.00
53
96
99
97
1.8
GHS 2009
50
95
1.9
64
65
0.99
58
95
100
99
1.7
GHS 2009
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
DHB 2008/09
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
UN estimate
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
DHB 2008/09
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
NFCS 2005
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
NFCS 2005
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
NFCS 2005
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
DoH 2010
–
–
–
3.0
2.0
1.5
–
–
–
–
–
HSRC 2010
36
64
1.8
43
43
0.99
42
40
54
69
1.7
GHS 2009
99
100
1.0
98
99
1.00
99
99
100
99
1.0
GHS 2009
89
98
1.1
91
94
0.97
91
96
99
97
1.1
GHS 2009
89
93
1.0
89
88
1.01
89
77
89
91
1.0
GHS 2009
26
74
2.8
36
44
0.82
36
45
82
81
2.3
GHS 2009
–
–
–
491
498
0.99
–
–
–
–
–
SACMEQ 2007
18
74
4.0
32
33
0.98
27
48
82
80
3.0
GHS 2009
24
5
0.2
20
19
1.05
22
8
3
3
0.1
GHS 2009
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
SAPS 2010
–
–
–
14
9
1.46
12
13
7
4
0.4
YRBS 2008
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Stats SA 2007
21
4
0.2
17
17
1.00
19
4
2
1
0.0
GHS 2009
* Data should be read with caution as several districts and provinces recorded values over 100%. ** Stats SA has only published provincial data up to 2005. National data is available up to 2009.
Summary View of Inequity Among Children – How Far Have We Come? 19
© UNICEF/Giacomo Pirozzi
Income quintile
Status of Child Poverty and Hunger
Children’s Rights to an Adequate Standard of Living
Rights CRC, Article 27: (1) States Parties recognise the right of every child to a standard of living adequate for the child’s physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development. (2) The parent(s) or others responsible for the child have the primary responsibility to secure, within their abilities and financial capacities, the conditions of living necessary for the child’s development. (3) States Parties, in accordance with national conditions and within their means, shall take appropriate measures to assist parents and others responsible for the child to implement this right and shall in case of need provide material assistance and support programmes, particularly with regard to nutrition, clothing and housing.
Related International goals/targets MDG 1, Target 1.A: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than one dollar a day. MDG 1, Target 1.B: Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all, including women and young people. MDG 1, Target 1.C: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger.
Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Articles 14 (2)(c); 20(2)(a). SA Constitution Section 27(1): Everyone has the right to have access to – (b) sufficient food and water …. Section 28(1): Every child has the right – (c) to basic nutrition …. National targets DRDLR Service Delivery Agreement, output 7.2: Improved access to affordable and diverse food. Key targets: Decrease the proportion of the total population that experiences hunger from 52% in 2005 to 30% in 2014 using national food consumption survey data. 2 0 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
© UNICEF/Kate Pawelczyk
Vision 2014: Halve poverty between 2004 and 2014.
In South Africa, 11.9 million children (64% of all children) live in income poverty Number and percentage of children living in poverty by province, 2008
North West 907,000 70.2%
Northern Cape 298,000 70.0%
Free State 696,000 66.3%
Eastern Cape 1,981,000 71.5% Western Cape 656,000 36.7%
Mpumalanga 1,049,000 69.1% KwaZuluNatal 2,902,000 70.9%
Black children constitute a disproportionately large share of the total number of children living in poverty
Percentage share of each population group in the total child population and the total number of children living in poverty, 2008 100
≤ 60%
60.1 – 70%
Share (%) of total child population
96
85
Share (%) of total children in poverty
80
70.1 – 80% > 80%
Percentage
Limpopo 1,993,000 83.3%
Gauteng 1,451,000 42.2%
Racial disparities in child poverty remain
Note: The poverty line is set at the 40th percentile of household per capita income. This translates into a per person monthly income of less than R570 in 2008 Rands. Source: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town (2010). South African Child Gauge 2009/2010. Analysis of Stats SA General Household Survey 2008.
60
40
20 8 0
African/Black
6
4
Coloured
2
0.4 White
0.3
Indian/Asian
Source: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town (2010). South African Child Gauge 2009/2010. Analysis of Stats SA General Household Survey 2008, and Stats SA Mid-year Population Estimates 2008.
Child poverty has decreased by an average annual rate of 3.2% between 2004 and 2008 in all declining by just 13% over the period If the Vision 2014 target is to be met, child poverty has to decrease from the current rate of 64% to 37% in 2014
Percentage of children living in poverty by province, 2002–2008 100 88
60
75
73
66
64 48
77
69
78
70
74
70
78 83 71
72
51
2004 2008
42
Limpopo
Northern Cape
North West
Mpumalanga
Free State
Gauteng
Western Cape
20
Eastern Cape
National 2014 target 37%
37
KwaZulu-Natal
40
South Africa
© UNICEF/Rebecca Hearfield
Child poverty rates
80
83
Note: The poverty line is set at the 40th percentile of household per capita income. Source: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town (2010). Children Count – Abantwana Babalulekile. Analysis of Stats SA General Household Survey 2004–2008.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o a n A d e q u a t e S t a n d a r d o f L i v i n g 2 1
Unemployment appears to be a key driver of poverty Overall, nearly 4 out of 10 children live in households with no employed household members. Among the poorest, 7 of out 10 children live in households with no employed members
Percentage of children living in households with no economically active household members by province and household income quintile, 2009
80 70
69
Limpopo 54%
Percentage
60 50 40
31
30
10
10 0
Gauteng 16%
North West 42%
20 8
Mpumalanga 34%
4 Poorest 20% Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Free State 33%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
KwaZulu-Natal 43%
Northern Cape 46%
Average for South Africa = 37%
Percentage Eastern Cape 51%
Š UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Western Cape 12%
2 2 S O U T H A F R I C Aâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; S C H I L D R E N
1 in 3 children nationwide experience hunger or are at risk of hunger
Children in the poorest households and female-headed households are significantly more likely to experience hunger
Hunger risk classification in children by province, 2009
Hunger risk classification in children by household income quintile and sex of household head, 2009 50
22
Limpopo Gauteng Western Cape Northern Cape Eastern Cape North West Mpumalanga KwaZulu-Natal
10
10
9
40
81
15
12
17
74
7 21
76 8
23 25 26
71 11
66
7
68
8
20%
33
12 13
At risk of hunger (%) 27
24
20
7 7 9
4 2
57 10
40%
0
52 60%
80%
100%
Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Experience hunger (%)
9
9
10
14 38
30
12
15
66
30
Free State 0%
67
Percentage
South Africa
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Femaleheaded HH
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Maleheaded HH
Experience hunger (%) At risk of hunger (%) Food secure (%)
Progress made in reducing child hunger is at risk of being reversed Percentage of children experiencing hunger, 2002–2009
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). Reweighted GHS 2002–2008 data series and GHS 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
40 31
30
30 Percentage
Note: The Hunger Scale Questionnaire introduced in the GHS 2009 is composed of eight questions that investigate whether adults and children are affected by food insecurity, food shortages, perceived food insufficiency or altered food intake due to constraints on resources. Children living in households responding negatively to all eight questions are classified as ‘food secure’. Children in households responding affirmatively to 1–4 questions are classified as ‘at risk of hunger’, while children in households responding affirmatively to five or more questions are considered to ‘experience hunger’.
26 23
20
22 17
18 15
10
0
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Note: Data for 2009 are not strictly comparable with data for previous years because of revisions in the GHS questionnaire. The GHS 2002–2008 asks: “In the past 12 months, did any child in this household go hungry because there wasn’t enough food?” Children living in households reporting ‘sometimes’, ‘often’ or ‘always’ are classified as experiencing hunger. The GHS 2009 asks: “Did your children ever say they are hungry during the past year because there was not enough food in the house?” (Yes/No).
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o a n A d e q u a t e S t a n d a r d o f L i v i n g 2 3
Rights CRC, Article 26: (1) States Parties shall recognise for every child the right to benefit from social security, including social insurance, and shall take the necessary measures to achieve the full realisation of this right in accordance with their national law. (2) The benefits should, where appropriate, be granted, taking into account the resources and the circumstances of the child and persons having responsibility for the maintenance of the child, as well as any other consideration relevant to an application for benefits made by or on behalf of the child. SA Constitution Section 27(1): Everyone has the right to have access to – (c) social security, including, if they are unable to support themselves and their dependants, appropriate social assistance. Section 27(2): The state must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of each of these rights.
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
The Right to Social Security
Children’s access to social grants has expanded dramatically The eligibility age range for the child support grant has gradually been extended from 0–6 years in 1999 to 0–17 years from 2012 onwards
Child Support Grant Year
Beneficiaries
Age threshold
Care Dependency Grant Nominal grant value
Beneficiaries
Nominal grant value
Foster Care Grant Beneficiaries
Nominal grant value
1999
21,997
< 7 years
R100
16,835
R520
46,496
R374
2000
150,366
< 7 years
R100
22,789
R540
49,843
R390
2001
856,402
< 7 years
R110
33,574
R570
66,967
R410
2002
1,277,396
< 7 years
R140
34,978
R640
67,817
R460
2003
3,947,073
< 9 years
R160
42,355
R700
83,574
R500
2004
4,446,230
< 11 years
R170
76,494
R740
120,571
R530
2005
5,465,545
< 14 years
R180
86,917
R780
195,454
R560
2006
7,075,266
< 14 years
R190
90,112
R820
317,434
R590
2007
7,892,869
< 14 years
R200
98,631
R870
400,503
R620
2008
8,189,975
< 14 years
R220
102,292
R960
454,199
R650
2009
8,765,354
< 15 years
R240
107,065
R1,010
474,759
R680
2010
9,570,287
< 16 years
R250
110,731
R1,080
510,760
R710
2011*
10,336,000
< 17 years
R260
121,000
R1,080
554,000
R710
2012*
10,977,000
< 18 years
R270
128,000
R1,140
613,000
R740
Note: *Projections by National Treasury. The Child Support Grant is paid to parents or primary caregivers of a child within the eligible age range who pass the means test. The Care Dependency Grant is paid to parents, primary caregivers or foster parents of any child with severe mental and/or physical disabilities between the ages of 1 and 18 years, requiring full-time home care. The Foster Care Grant is paid to foster parents for children between the ages of 0 and 18 years. An extension order on a foster care grant can be given until the age of 21 years. Source: South African Social Security Agency’s (SASSA) Social Security Pension System (Socpen). National Treasury (2011) National Budget Review 2011.
2 4 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Yet, 2.1 million children eligible for the child support grant (27% of all eligible children) were not receiving it in 2008
Uptake of the child support grant is lowest among children under 1 and in the older age groups Percentage of children receiving a child support grant by age (single years), 2009
Percentage of eligible children receiving the child support grant, 2008 Target = 100
80
80
66
60
73
66
66
66
66
61
63
64
65
61
Percentage
Percentage
60
40
56 50
40 38
35
27
20
0
59
20
Yes
No 0
Source: Coetzee (2010). Finding the Benefits – Evaluating the Impact of the South African Child Support Grant. Analysis of National Income Dynamics Survey (NIDS) 2008.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Age
Lack of documentation is the biggest barrier to access the child support grant Reasons why eligible caregivers do not apply for the child support grant, 2008 9%
6% 5%
10% Don't have the right documentation Haven't gotten round to it yet Caregiver income too high In process of applying
12%
24%
Cannot be bothered
Missing/unspecified
6%
Cost of application too high Parent(s) working Child receives other grant Parent(s) work for government
1% 1% 1% 2%
Child too old
3%
Not the child's mother
3%
Application process too complicated
1%
Don't know
6%
Don't know how to apply Other
34%
Source: Coetzee (2010). Finding the Benefits – Evaluating the Impact of the South African Child Support Grant. Analysis of National Income Dynamics Survey (NIDS) 2008.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o a n A d e q u a t e S t a n d a r d o f L i v i n g 2 5
Children from the poorest households are less likely to live in formal housing
The Right to Housing Related international goals/targets
Percentage of children living in formal, informal or traditional housing by province, 2009 9
51
2 6 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
80
15
8
6
11
2
80
4 81
7
8
85
86
1 88
7 90
Percentage
90 80
30
10
16
20
10
1
3
60 50 40
61
30
70
74
98
90
20 10 0
Informal
Traditional Formal
7
70
Poorest 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Traditional
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Formal
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
2.8 million children (15% of all children) have been reached with a RDP or state subsidised dwelling
60 58 46
40
9
Informal
72
Number and percentage of children living in Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) or state subsidised dwelling by province, 2009
20
Free State
Limpopo
North West
Mpumalanga
Northern Cape
Free State
Gauteng
0 Western Cape
DoHS Service Delivery Agreement, Output 8.3: Mobilisation of well-located public land for low income and affordable housing. Key target for 2014: Set aside at least 6,250 hectares of welllocated public land for low income and affordable housing.
20
38
80
South Africa
DoHS Service Delivery Agreement, Output 8.2: Improve access to basic services. Key target by 2014: Universal access to electricity (100%).
20
18
Section 26(1): Everyone has the right to have access to adequate housing.
DoHS Service Delivery Agreement, Output 8.1: Accelerated Delivery of Housing Opportunities. Key target by 2014: Upgrading of 400,000 households in well-located informal settlements with access to basic services and secure tenure.
4
100
SA Constitution
National targets
3
100
Percentage
1.7 million children (9% of all children) live in informal housing such as shacks in backyards or squatter settlements
Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Article 20(2)(a).
Section 28(1): Every child has the right – (c) to … shelter ….
2
MDG 7, Target 7.D: By 2020, to have achieved a significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers (global figure).
KwaZulu-Natal
CRC, Article 27: (1) States Parties recognise the right of every child to a standard of living adequate for the child’s physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development. (3) States Parties, in accordance with national conditions and within their means, shall take appropriate measures to assist parents and others responsible for the child to implement this right and shall in case of need provide material assistance and support programmes, particularly with regard to … housing.
Eastern Cape
Rights
Percentage of children living in formal, informal or traditional housing by household income quintile, 2009
Note: Formal refers to dwelling/house or brick/concrete block structure on a separate stand or yard or on farm; flat or apartment; town/cluster/semidetached house; dwelling/house/flat/room in backyard; room/flatlet on a property or a larger dwelling servants’ quarters/granny flat. Informal refers to informal dwelling/shack in backyard or an informal/squatter settlement or on farm. Traditional refers to traditional dwelling/hut/structure made of traditional materials. Numbers may not add up to 100 due to rounding. Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Number
Percentage
311,820
29
Northern Cape
116,680
27
Western Cape
464,840
26
Gauteng
543,790
17
North West
193,630
15
Mpumalanga
223,690
15
Eastern Cape
329,820
12 12
Limpopo
265,590
KwaZulu-Natal
343,760
8
South Africa
2,793,615
15
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
8 out of 10 children live in households connected to the mains electricity supply Percentage of children living in households with a connection to the mains electricity supply, 2009
Percentage of children living in RDP or state subsidised dwelling by household income quintile, 2009
19
20
Percentage
15 14
13
10
5 3 0
80
South Africa
20
National 2014 target
Children from middle-income households appear to have received most benefits from RDP or state subsidised housing
KwaZulu-Natal
65
Eastern Cape
65
Limpopo
88
Mpumalanga
88
North West
88
Gauteng
91
Northern Cape
91
Western Cape
92 93
Free State Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
0%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Children from middle-income households appear to be benefiting most from receiving free electricity
20%
40%
60%
80%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
100%
47% of the poorest children live in households using wood as the main energy source for cooking Percentage of children by main energy source for cooking in the household by income quintile, 2009
Percentage of children living in households with a connection to the mains supply receiving free electricity, 2009 35 30
Percentage
25
41
Poorest 20%
31
32
56
Second 20%
25
47
30
2 2
1
2 3
1
2
2
7
3 2
1
96
11
3
9
76
Middle 20%
20
7
13
7
Electricity from mains Wood Paraffin Gas Coal Animal dung
20
15
88
Fourth 20%
12
10
Richest 20%
5 0%
0
Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Richest 20%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
C h i l d r e n â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s R i g h t s t o a n A d e q u a t e S t a n d a r d o f L i v i n g 2 7
The Right to Water and Sanitation
4 out of 10 children do not have access to piped water inside the dwelling or on site Percentage of children living in households with access to water by type of source, 2009
Rights CRC, Article 24: States Parties shall … take appropriate measures: (d) to combat disease and malnutrition, including within the framework of primary health care, through, inter alia, the application of readily available technology and through the provision of … clean drinking-water, taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental pollution.
80
23
MDG Goal 7, Target 7.C: Halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation.
5
4
2
0
6
7
8
60
60
91
91
92
21
65
70
30 55 45
40
39
Number and percentage of children by main source of drinking water in the household, 2009
Number
Percentage
Piped (tap) water in dwelling
6,101,660
32.8
Piped (tap) water on site or in yard
5,067,520
27.2
Public tap
3,763,845
20.2
Flowing water/stream/river
1,392,980
7.5
Neighbour's tap
536,325
2.9
Borehole off site/communal
434,310
2.3
Spring
369,350
2.0
Water-carrier/tanker
354,415
1.9
Borehole on sit
236,305
1.3
Other (e.g. well, dam, rain-water tank)
350,650
1.9
18,607,354
100
Total
31
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
20
Other
Western Cape
Gauteng
Free State
Northern Cape
Mpumalanga
0
North West
Where do these 1.4 million children live? KwaZulu-Natal
Related International goals/targets
14
42
Limpopo
Key target by 2014: Universal access to water and sanitation (100%).
11
28
South Africa
DoHS Service Delivery Agreement, Output 8.2: Improve access to basic services.
27
34
Section 27(1): Everyone has the right to have access to – (b) sufficient … water. National targets
19
26
Eastern Cape
SA Constitution
39
100
Percentage
Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Article 14(2)(c).
17
Almost 1.4 million children (8% of all children) live in households relying on rivers or streams as their main source of drinking water
Percentage distribution of children living in households relying on flowing water/stream/river as main source of drinking water, 2009
7%
3%
Public or neighbour's tap
Mpumalanga
Piped (tap) water in dwelling or on site
32% Note: Numbers may not add up to 100 due to rounding. Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
58%
Limpopo KwaZulu-Natal Eastern Cape
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
2 8 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Among children in the poorest households just 50% have access to adequate sanitation
Percentage of children living in households with access to adequate sanitation by province, 2002 and 2009
Percentage of children living in households with access to adequate sanitation by household income quintile, 2009
Limpopo
21
Mpumalanga
36 38
51
36
KwaZulu-Natal
2009
43
22
Eastern Cape
2002
64
59
44
North West
64
55
Free State Northern Cape
77 78 80
88 88
Gauteng Western Cape 0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
93 94 100%
Note: Adequate sanitation includes flush toilets connect to a public sewerage system or septic tank, and pit latrines with ventilation. Inadequate sanitation includes chemical toilets, pit latrines without ventilation, bucket toilets or no toilet facility at all. Source: Statistics South Africa (2003; 2010). General Household Survey 2002; 2009. Analysis of 2002 data by Childrenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Institute, University of Cape Town. Analysis of 2009 data by UNICEF South Africa.
80
60
72 59 50
40
20
0
Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Percentage distribution of the children living in households with no toilet facility by province, 2009
Number and percentage of children by type of toilet facility used in the household, 2009
Percentage
Free State Western Cape
1% 2%
Northern Cape
2%
North West
2%
Gauteng
3%
Mpumalanga
5%
Flush toilet (connected to public sewerage system of septic tank)
8,499,515
45.7
Pit latrine/toilet without ventilation pipe
4,917,100
26.4
Pit latrine/toilet with ventilation pipe
3,431,120
18.4
None
1,471,455
7.9
Bucket toilet
174,915
0.9
Chemical toilet
52,305
0.3
Other/unspecified
60,940
0.3
18,607,355
100
Total
95
84
Where do these 1.5 million children live?
Yet, nearly 1.5 million children (8% of all children) live in households with no toilet facility at all
Number
100
Percentage
47
South Africa
National 2014 target
Access to adequate sanitation has improved over the past decade
KwaZulu-Natal
32%
Limpopo
12% Other
16%
Eastern Cape
41%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
C h i l d r e n â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s R i g h t s t o a n A d e q u a t e S t a n d a r d o f L i v i n g 2 9
The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health
Children’s Rights to Life and Basic Health
Rights
National targets
CRC, Article 24: (1) States Parties recognise the right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health and to facilities for the treatment of illness and rehabilitation of health. States Parties shall strive to ensure that no child is deprived of his or her right of access to such health care services. (2) States Parties shall pursue full implementation of this right and, in particular, shall take appropriate measures: (a) To diminish infant and child mortality; (b) To ensure the provision of necessary medical assistance and health care to all children with emphasis on the development of primary health care … (d) To ensure appropriate pre-natal and post-natal health care for mothers.
DoH Service Delivery Agreement, Output 2.1: Decreasing maternal and child mortality. Key targets by 2014:
Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Articles 5; 14 and 20(2)(a). SA Constitution Section 11: Everyone has the right to life. Section 27(1): Everyone has the right to have access to – (a) health care services, including reproductive health care. Section 28(1): Every child has the right … (c) to … basic health care services …
3 0 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
• Decrease infant mortality rate to 18 deaths (or less) per 1,000 live births. • Decrease under-five mortality rate to 20 deaths (or less) per 1,000 live births. • Decrease maternal mortality ratio to 100 (or less) per 100,000 live births. • Increase the proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel to 100%. • Decrease diarrhoea incidence in children under 5 years. • Decrease pneumonia incidence in children under 5 years. Related International goals/targets MDG Goal 4, Target 4.A: Reduce by two-thirds, between 1990 and 2015, the under-five mortality rate. MDG Goal 5, Target 5.A: Reduce by three quarters, between 1990 and 2015, the maternal mortality ratio. MDG Goal 5, Target 5.B: Achieve, by 2015, universal access to reproductive health.
9 out of 10 births take place in health facilities
Yet, South Africa is not on track for meeting the health targets of the 2015 Millennium Development Goals …
Percentage of deliveries that take place in public health facilities under supervision of trained personnel by district, 2008/09
Under-five mortality is at the same level it was in 1990
Maternal mortality has increased by 80% since 1990
Trends in infant (IMR) and under-five (U5MR) mortality rate (deaths per 1,000 live births), 1990–2009
Trend in maternal mortality ratio (MMR, deaths per 100,000 live births), 1990–2008
Limpopo
Gauteng
500 440
Free State
Northern Cape Western Cape
Mpumalanga
KwaZuluNatal under 60%
Eastern Cape
60 – 69% 70 – 79% 80 – 89% 90% and above
Source: Day, C.; Monticelli, F.; Barron, P.; Haynes, R.; Smith, J. and Sello, E. (eds) (2010). The District Health Barometer 2008/09. Durban: Health Systems Trust.
Deaths per 1,000 live births
North West
Deaths per 1,000 live births
100 80 62 60 40
U5MR
62
IMR 48
43
20 0
U5MR 2015 target = 20 IMR 2015 target = 18 1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
Note: The mortality trends are produced by compiling national estimates from the 1988–1992 Human Science Research Council (HSRC) Survey, the 1998 and the 2003 South Africa Demographic and Health Surveys, and the 2007 Community Survey. A regression curve is then fitted to these data points and extrapolated to a common reference year to produce a smooth trend.
410
400
380
300 230
260
200
100
0
MMR 2015 target = 100
1990
1995
2000
2005
2008
2015
Source: WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and World Bank (2010). Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008.
Source: UN Inter-agency Group on Child Mortality Estimation (2010). Levels and Trends in Child Mortality.
Each year in South Africa … • 4,300 mothers die due to complications of pregnancy and child birth. • 20,000 babies are stillborn and another 23,000 die before they reach 1 month of age. • In total, some 75,000 children die before their fifth birthday.
This toll of over 270 maternal and child deaths every day is mainly due to HIV and AIDS and poor implementation of existing packages of care. Source: The Lancet (2009). Saving the lives of South Africa’s mothers, babies, and children: can the health system deliver?
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o L i f e a n d B a s i c H e a l t h 3 1
Most causes of under-five deaths are either preventable or treatable
Many child deaths are the result of avoidable factors, missed opportunities and substandard care
The lives of almost 50,000 newborn babies and children could be saved in 2015 if South Africa reached high, effective coverage of key packages of interventions such as PMTCT and neonatal care. This can be achieved at relatively little cost.
61% of avoidable factors in child deaths are related to health system failures (either by health personnel or administrators), such as poor assessment and management in hospitals. 39% of avoidable factors are related to caregiver and family actions, such as delay in seeking care or caregiver not realising the severity of illness.
Injuries
11% Diarrhoea
11% Other child illness
6%
5%
18%
Sepsis and meningitis
2% 13% Pre-term birth 6% Pneumonia
Percentage of modifiable factors related to actions by caregivers/family, health personnel or administrators, 2007
Infections
Neonatal 30%
6%
HIV/AIDS 35%
Birth asphyxia
3%
Congenital
2%
Other
Source: Department of Health, Medical Research Council, University of Pretoria, UNICEF, Save the Children (2008). Every Death Counts: Saving the lives of South Africa’s mothers, babies and children. The Lancet (2009). Saving the lives of South Africa’s mothers, babies, and children: can the health system deliver?
39%
Avoidable factors related to cargiver and family Avoidable factors related to health personnel Avoidable factors related to administration for action
43%
Source: Stephen, Mulaudzi, Kauchali and Patrick (2009). Saving Children 2005–2007: A fourth survey of child healthcare in South Africa. Pretoria: University of Pretoria, MRC, CDC.
Government data suggest 30 of the 52 districts did not achieve the national target of 90% full immunisation coverage
Data from surveys suggest immunisation coverage has decreased compared to 1994
Percentage of children under 1 year who have received all their recommended vaccinations, 2008/09
National immunisation coverage among children 12–23 months by specific vaccines, 1994 and 2008
Gauteng enlarged
100
1994
Limpopo Immunisation coverage (%)
2008
Gauteng North West Mpumalanga Free State
KwaZulu-Natal Less than 70%
Northern Cape
70 – 79% Eastern Cape Western Cape
80 – 89% 90 – 99% 100% and over
3 2 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Source: Day, C; Monticelli, F; Barron, P; Haynes, R; Smith, J and Sello, E (eds) (2010). The District Health Barometer 2008/09. Durban: Health Systems Trust.
80
86
73 67 60
63
65 56
40
45 BCG
DTP1
DTP3
Polio3
Measles
HepB3
Hib3
Note: The Hepatitis B vaccine was introduced in 1995; earliest data point for HepB3 refers to 1998. The Hib vaccine was introduced in 1999; earliest data point for Hib3 refers to 2000 (WHO/UNICEF, 2009). Source: The South African Vitamin A Consultative Group (SAVACG, 1995). Children aged 6–71 months in South Africa, 1994: Their anthropometric, Vitamin A, iron and immunisation coverage status. Shisana O, et al. (2010). South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence, Behaviour and Communication Survey, 2008: The health of our children.
25 20
Free State
Northern Cape
Limpopo
Eastern Cape
Mpumalanga
Gauteng
North West
KwaZulu-Natal
Western Cape
0
1 in 10 children are underweight Percentage of children 1–9 years suffering from underweight (moderate and severe mixed acute and chronic malnutrition) by province, 1999 and 2005 38
40
National targets
25
1999 2005
24
Source: Department of Health (2000). The National Food Consumption Survey 1999; Department of Health (2007). The National Food Consumption Survey 2005: Fortification Baseline (NFCS-FB). Estimates are calculated according to the NCHS/ WHO reference population.
20
10
15
15
15 10
9
9 6
5
5
11 6
7
8
8
12
12
14 14
8 4
National 2014 target
Northern Cape
Free State
North West
Limpopo
0 Mpumalanga
Percentage
30
Western Cape
MDG 1, Target 3: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger.
12
10
35
Related International goals/targets
2005
24
18
19
17
15
15
15
1999
20
20 19
18
15
Section 28(1): Every child has the right … (c) to basic nutrition ….
Key target by 2014: The rate of under-nutrition of children falls from 9.3% (2005 NFCS) to 5% in 2014.
23
28
Source: Department of Health (2000). The National Food Consumption Survey 1999; Department of Health (2007). The National Food Consumption Survey 2005: Fortification Baseline (NFCS-FB). Estimates are calculated according to the NCHS/ WHO reference population.
5
Section 27(1): Everyone has the right to have access to … (b) sufficient food ….
DRDLR Service Delivery Agreement, output 7.2: Improved access to affordable and diverse food.
25 22
30 28
26
Eastern Cape
SA Constitution
30
Gauteng
Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Articles 14(2)(c) and 20(2)(a).
30
KwaZulu-Natal
CRC, Article 27: (3) States Parties, in accordance with national conditions and within their means, shall take appropriate measures to assist parents and others responsible for the child to implement this right and shall in case of need provide material assistance and support programmes, particularly with regard to nutrition ….
Percentage of children 1–9 years suffering from stunting (moderate and severe chronic malnutrition) by province, 1999 and 2005
South Africa
CRC, Article 24: States Parties shall pursue full implementation of this right and, in particular, shall take appropriate measures: (e) To ensure that all segments of society, in particular parents and children, are informed, have access to education and are supported in the use of basic knowledge of child health and nutrition, the advantages of breastfeeding ….
1 in 5 children are stunted, a consequence of chronic nutritional deprivation
South Africa
Rights
Status of child nutrition
Percentage
The Right to Food and Nutrition
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o L i f e a n d B a s i c H e a l t h 3 3
Close to 5% of children suffer from wasting and face a markedly increased risk of death
Younger children are most severely affected by malnutrition
Percentage of children 1–9 years suffering from wasting (moderate and severe acute malnutrition) by province, 1999 and 2005
Chronic undernutrition in early childhood results in diminished cognitive and physical development, which puts children at a disadvantage for the rest of their lives
19
20
Percentage of children 1–9 years suffering from stunting, underweight and wasting by age group, 2005 1999 2005
25
23
12
8
8
6
Source: Department of Health (2000). The National Food Consumption Survey 1999; Department of Health (2007). The National Food Consumption Survey 2005: Fortification Baseline (NFCS-FB). Estimates are calculated according to the NCHS/WHO reference population.
Northern Cape
Western Cape
1 Mpumalanga
North West
Free State
KwaZulu-Natal
South Africa
0
3
2
1
1
4
3
3
3
4
Limpopo
3
Eastern Cape
4
4
Gauteng
5
5
Stunting
20
10
10
Percentage
Percentage
15
16
15 11
10
Underweight
12
Wasting
5
5
0
1–3 years
9
8
5
3
4–6 years
7–9 years
Source: Department of Health (2007). The National Food Consumption Survey 2005: Fortification Baseline (NFCS-FB). Estimates are calculated according to the NCHS/WHO reference population.
Micronutrient deficiencies: vitamin A and iron deficiency has doubled between 1994 and 2005
South Africa faces a dual burden of over- and under-nutrition, especially among youth
Percentage of children 1–5 years affected by vitamin A deficiency (serum retinol level < 20 μg/dL)
Percentage of high school learners (in Grades 8–11) who are underweight (low weight for age); overweight (according to age-dependent BMI cut-off points) by province, 2008
33
South Africa Northern Cape Western Cape
2005
23 21
North West Mpumalanga
24
Gauteng
44
Limpopo 20%
40%
Western Cape
65
Limpopo Free State
76
38
KwaZulu-Natal
64
89 60%
80%
100%
Northern Cape 0 0%
1994
11
2
2005
8
5
KwaZulu-Natal
10
4 8 9 4
5%
15%
20%
Source: The South African Vitamin A Consultative Group (SAVACG, 1995). Children aged 6–71 months in South Africa, 1994: Their anthropometric, Vitamin A, iron and immunisation coverage status; Department of Health (2007). The National Food Consumption Survey 2005: Fortification Baseline (NFCS-FB).
3 4 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
16
12 14 14 14
Northern Cape 0%
17
10
Limpopo 10%
22
10
North West
16
7
20
7
Free State
14
26
7
Eastern Cape
12
22
5
Gauteng
12
20
5
Western Cape
11
7
8
South Africa Mpumalanga
9
4
Mpumalanga
62
31
Eastern Cape
0%
KwaZulu-Natal
52
27
Eastern Cape Gauteng
50
33
5
South Africa North West
44
32
Free State
1994
64
19
Percentage of children 1–5 years affected by iron deficiency anaemia (%Hb <11 and Ferritin <12)
5%
10%
15%
16
% of high school learners Underweight 18 20%
Overweight 25%
Source: Medical Research Council (2010). The 2nd South African National Youth Risk Behaviour Survey 2008.
30%
Coverage of interventions to improve nutrition
Vitamin A supplementation coverage is low in all provinces Percentage of children (12–59 months) receiving a high dose of vitamin A by province, 2009
Continuum of infant feeding practices
Percentage of children put to the breast within 1 hour of delivery; exclusively breastfed; both breast-fed and receiving complementary foods; and continuing to breastfeed at specified ages Early initiation of breastfeeding (one hour of birth)
61
Exclusive breastfeeding (0-5 months old)
8
Complementary feeding (6-9 months old)
49
Continued breastfeeding (12-15 months old)
66
Continued breastfeeding (12-23 months old) 10%
20%
37
Mpumalanga
30
Northern Cape
32
Limpopo
32
North West
33
Eastern Cape
37
Western Cape
38
KwaZulu-Natal
38
Guateng
40
Free State
41
0%
31
0%
South Africa
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
80%
Source: Department of Health (2007). Demographic and Health Survey 2003.
Source: District Health Information System (DHIS, 2009) in Health Systems Trust (2010). South African Health Review.
Use of adequately iodised salt in households has improved
6 out of 10 children in public schools benefit from the School Nutrition Programme
Percentage of households using adequately iodated salt (> 15 ppm of iodine) by province, 1998 and 2005 100
1998 2005
80
Percentage
62
70
77
60
75
77
80
79
66
88
87
84
80
Percentage of children in public schools benefiting from the school nutrition programme by province, 2009
76 65
69
55 39
40
45
45
48
20
0
South Africa
Limpopo
Northern Cape
Gauteng
Eastern Mpumalanga Cape
North West
Free State
KwaZuluNatal
Source: Jooste L, Weight M and Lombard C (2001). A national survey of the iodine content of household salt in South Africa. Bull WHO 2001; 79:534–540; Department of Health (2007). The National Food Consumption Survey 2005: Fortification Baseline (NFCS-FB).
Western Cape
South Africa
62
Gauteng
45
Free State
51
Western Cape
59
North West
59
KwaZulu-Natal
61
Mpumalanga
67
Limpopo
69
Eastern Cape
70
Northern Cape
87
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o L i f e a n d B a s i c H e a l t h 3 5
Children and AIDS
CRC, Article 6 (1): States Parties recognise that every child has the inherent right to life. (2). States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child. Committee on the Rights of the Child – General Comment No. 3, Article 25: States parties are requested to ensure implementation of the strategies recommended by the United Nations agencies to prevent HIV infection in infants and young children. These include: (a) the primary prevention of HIV infection among parents-to-be; (b) the prevention of unintended pregnancies in HIV-infected women; (c) the prevention of HIV transmission from HIV-infected women to their infants; and (d) the provision of care, treatment and support to HIV-infected women, their infants and families. Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Article 5. SA Constitution Section 11: Everyone has the right to life. National targets DoH Service Delivery Agreement, Output 2.3: Combating HIV and AIDS and decreasing the burden of diseases from tuberculosis. Key targets by 2014:
• Total number of patients (adults and children) on ART increases from 1.1 million to 3.2 million. International goals/targets MDG Goal 6, Target 6.A: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS.
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Rights
MDG Goal 6, Target 6.B: Achieve, by 2010, universal access to treatment for HIV/AIDS for all those who need it.
South Africa has the largest burden of HIV and AIDS in the world 1 in 8 children infected with HIV globally live in South Africa
Summary of the AIDS epidemic, 2009
Number of people living with HIV Globally
South Africa
Share (%)
Total
33.3 million
5.6 million
17%
Adults
30.8 million
5.3 million
17%
Women
15.9 million
3.3 million
21%
Children (<15 years)
2.5 million
330,000
13%
Globally
South Africa
Share (%)
Total
2.6 million
390,000
15%
Adults
2.2 million
347,000
16%
370,000
43,000
12%
Globally
South Africa
Share (%)
People newly infected with HIV in 2009
Children (<15 years)
• Decrease HIV prevalence amongst 15–24 year old pregnant women.
AIDS deaths in 2009
• Decrease mother-to-child transmission rate from 10% to less than 5%.
Total
1.8 million
314,000
17%
Adults
1.6 million
284,000
18%
260,000
30,000
12%
• All eligible pregnant women to be initiated on ART at CD4 count of < 350. 3 6 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Children (<15 years)
Source: UNAIDS (2010). Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic and AIDS Info Database.
The epidemic has reached its peak and HIV prevalence has stabilised at a very high level National HIV prevalence in the adult population (15–49 years) and pregnant women (15–49 years), 1990–2009
In 5 districts in KwaZulu-Natal more than 40% of pregnant women are living with HIV
HIV prevalence rate (%) among pregnant woman (15–49 years) attending antenatal clinics by district, 2009
35
Source: Department of Health (2010). National Antenatal Sentinel HIV and Syphilis Prevalence Survey 2009.
Pregnant women 30
Close to 30% of pregnant women are HIV positive
Adult population
Percentage
25
North West 30.0%
20
Mpumalanga 34.7% KwaZulu-Natal 39.5%
Free State 30.1%
15 HIV prevalence among pregnant women
10
Northern Cape 17.2%
< 10% 5
10% – 19.9%
Source: UNAIDS (2010). AIDS Info Database.
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
20% – 29.9% 1990
0
Limpopo 21.4%
Gauteng 29.8%
Western Cape 16.9%
30% – 39.9%
Eastern Cape 28.1%
> 40%
Average for South Africa = 29.4%
9 in 10 pregnant women living with HIV receive antiretrovirals for preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV Estimated percentage of pregnant women living with HIV who received ARV for preventing MTCT, 2004–2009 Target = 100 100 88
80
Percentage
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
75 60 57 49
40 33 20 14 0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Source: Department of Health (2010). National Antenatal Sentinel HIV and Syphilis Prevalence Survey 2009; UNAIDS (2010). AIDS Info Database.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o L i f e a n d B a s i c H e a l t h 3 7
HIV prevalence among children has decreased since 2002
Children’s access to antiretroviral therapy has increased substantially in recent years
2.5% of children 2–14 years old are living with HIV
Around 100,000 children living with HIV were receiving treatment in 2010
HIV prevalence among children 2–14 years by province, 2002 and 2008
Number of children on comprehensive HIV and AIDS treatment (public sector), 2005–2010
2002
7 Immunisation coverage (%)
Dec. 2006
Dec. 2007
Dec. 2008
Dec. 2009
May 2010
3,005
7,173
11,841
19,689
28,791
32,528
KwaZulu-Natal
8 2008
6 5 4
2.1 2.2
3 2
Dec. 2005
2.5 4.1
1
3.8
3.2
2.8
2.5
2.3
1.1 Free State
Mpumalanga
North West
KwaZulu-Natal
Limpopo
Northern Cape
Gauteng
Eastern Cape
Western Cape
South Africa
0
Gauteng
3,885
7,066
9,844
14,445
19,519
22,194
Eastern Cape
1,054
1,354
3,141
4,737
8,160
9,880
North West
616
1,804
3,502
5,530
7,319
8,123
Limpopo
441
1,068
2,061
4,136
5,897
6,618
Western Cape
1,877
2,649
3,505
4,496
5,389
5,883
Mpumalanga
261
899
1,874
2,983
5,033
5,695
Free State
465
806
806
2,066
3,601
4,638
Northern Cape
355
550
1,120
1,441
1,921
2,123
South Africa
11,959
23,369
37,694
59,523
85,630
97,682
Source: Department of Health (2010). National Strategic Plan for HIV and AIDS/Comprehensive HIV and AIDS Treatment Plan statistics.
Yet, only 54% of children needing antiretroviral therapy were receiving it in 2009 Estimated coverage of antiretroviral therapy among children (0–14 years old), 2005–2009 100
Source: Shisana O, et al. (2009). South African national HIV prevalence, incidence, behaviour and communication survey 2008: A turning tide among teenagers? Cape Town: HSRC Press.
Target = 100%
80
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Percentage
60
54 40
40 25 20
0
3 8 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
19 11
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Source: Department of Health (2010). National Strategic Plan for HIV and AIDS, Comprehensive HIV and AIDS Treatment Plan statistics (numerator). UNAIDS (2010). Estimated number of children (0–14 years old) needing antiretroviral therapy based on UNAIDS/WHO methods (denominator).
HIV prevalence among youth is increasing in KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga while decreasing in all other provinces HIV prevalence among youth 15–24 years by province, 2002 and 2008 20
2002 2008
Immunisation coverage (%)
15.3 15
13.5 11.8
11.2
11.6 9.2
8.7
10
10.1
7.2
6.3
5 3.8
0
Western Cape
6.6
Source: Shisana O, et al. (2009). South African national HIV prevalence, incidence, behaviour and communication survey 2008: A turning tide among teenagers? Cape Town: HSRC Press.
3.9
3.9
Free State
8.7
8.3
5.6
3.0
9.3
11.7
Limpopo Northern Cape
North West
Eastern Gauteng Mpum- KwaZulu- South Cape alanga Natal Africa
Women are disproportionately affected by HIV Female youth are 3.5 times more likely to be HIV positive than their male counterparts
HIV prevalence and behavioural determinants among youth 15–24 years by sex, 2008 100
Female youth 87 73
60
40 27 20
31
28
14
11 4
0
30
HIV prevalence
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Percentage
80
Male youth
6 1 Comprehensive Intercorrect generational knowledge sex of HIV
6 Multiple sexual partnerships
Condom use at last sex
Source: Shisana O, et al. (2009). South African national HIV prevalence, incidence, behaviour and communication survey 2008: A turning tide among teenagers? Cape Town: HSRC Press.
Sexual debut before age of 15 years
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o L i f e a n d B a s i c H e a l t h 3 9
Children’s Rights to Early Childhood Development and Education
The Right to Early Childhood Development Rights
National targets
CRC, Article 6(2): States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the … development of the child.
DoE Service Delivery Agreement, Output 1.3: Improve Early Childhood Development. Key target by 2014:
CRC, Article 18(2): … States Parties shall render appropriate assistance to parents and legal guardians in the performance of their child-rearing responsibilities and shall ensure the development of institutions, facilities and services for the care of children.
The percentage of Grade 1 learners who have received formal Grade R increases from 80% to 100%.
Committee on the Rights of the Child General Comment No. 7, Article X: The Committee interprets the right to education during early childhood as beginning at birth and closely linked to young children’s right to maximum development (art. 6.2). Linking education to development is elaborated in article 29.1: States parties agree that the education of the child shall be directed to: (a) the development of the child’s personality, talents and mental and physical abilities to their fullest potential. … The Committee calls on States parties to ensure that all young children receive education in the broadest sense (as outlined in paragraph 28 above), which acknowledges a key role for parents, wider family and community, as well as the contribution of organised programmes of early childhood education provided by the State, the community or civil society institutions. Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Article 20(2)(b) and (c).
4 0 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
International goals/targets EFA, Goal 1: Expanding and improving comprehensive early childhood care and education, especially for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children.
Only 43% of children under 5 are exposed to an Early Childhood Development programme at home, a centre or elsewhere ECD is crucial in children’s mental development and in their readiness for school and life
35%
80
Gauteng
59%
70
Mpumalanga
42%
43%
67%
Northern Cape
60
KwaZuluNatal
33%
44%
Eastern Cape
38%
Percentage ≤ 35%
Western Cape
Ger in Grade R
North West
Free State
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Grade R (Reception Year) programmes are meant to prepare children for primary education
Participation in Grade R (Gross Enrolment Ratio) to sites attached to public and independent ordinary schools, 1999–2009
Limpopo
Percentage of children under 5 exposed to an ECD programme (anywhere) by province, 2009
Grade R enrolment increased from 15% in 1999 to 60% in 2009
60
50
49
40
40
30 20 10
22
23
2000
2001
27
31
53
44
35
15
35.1 – 50%
38%
51.1 – 60% Average for South Africa = 43%
> 60.1%
0
1999
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Source: Department of Education (2011). Education for All (EFA) Country Report South Africa, 2010.
Children in the poorest households are only half as likely to benefit from ECD than children in the richest households Percentage of children under 5 exposed to an ECD programme (anywhere) by household income quintile, 2009 80 70 64 55
50 40 30
41
Note: In South Africa, ECD is defined as the emotional, cognitive, sensory, spiritual, moral, physical, social and communication development of a child.
44
36
20 10 0
Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
© Leonie Marinovich
Percentage
60
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o E a r l y C h i l d h o o d D e v e l o p m e n t a n d E d u c a t i o n 4 1
The Right to Education Related Rights
National targets
Related International goals/targets
CRC, Article 28: (1) States Parties recognise the right of the child to education, and with a view to achieving this right progressively and on the basis of equal opportunity, they shall, in particular: (a) Make primary education compulsory and available free to all; (b) Encourage the development of different forms of secondary education, including general and vocational education, make them available and accessible to every child, and take appropriate measures such as the introduction of free education and offering financial assistance in case of need; … (e) Take measures to encourage regular attendance at schools and the reduction of drop-out rates.
DoE Service Delivery Agreement, Output 1.1: Improve the quality of teaching and learning.
MDG 2, Target 2.A: Ensure that, by 2015, children everywhere, boys and girls alike, will be able to complete a full course of primary schooling.
Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Articles 11 and 13. SA Constitution Section 29(1): Everyone has the right – (a) to a basic education, including adult education; and (b) to further education, which the state, through reasonable measures, must make progressively available and accessible.
4 2 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
• Percentage of Grade 3 learners performing at the required literacy level according to the country’s Annual National Assessments increases from 48% to 60%.
MDG Goal 3, Target 3.A: Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education, preferably by 2005, and in all levels of education no later than 2015.
• Average score obtained in Grade 6 in mathematics in the SACMEQ assessment increases from 495 to 520. • Percentage of Grade 9 learners performing at the required mathematics level according to the country’s Annual National Assessments increases to 60%. • Number of Grade 12 learners who become eligible for a Bachelor’s programme in the public national examinations increases from 110,000 to 175,000. • The percentage of teachers who are able to attain minimum standards in anonymous and samplebased assessments of their subject knowledge (baseline and target to be determined). • The percentage of learners having access to the required textbooks and workbooks for the entire school year increases to 100%. • The percentage of learners in schools with a library or media centre fulfilling certain minimum standards increasing by 20 percentage points.
© UNICEF/Rebecca Hearfield
CRC, Article 23 (3): Recognising the special needs of a disabled child, assistance extended in accordance with paragraph 2 of the present article shall be provided free of charge, whenever possible, taking into account the financial resources of the parents or others caring for the child, and shall be designed to ensure that the disabled child has effective access to and receives education, training ….
Key targets by 2014:
School attendance among children has increased steadily in the past 15 years, but less so for the older age groups
Access to Education
1.20
100
Less than 90% of secondary-school-age children attend school
School attendance secondary-school-age children
1.10
80
1.05 1.00
60 GPI
School attendance among primary-school-age children
1.15 School attendance rate (%)
Percentage of children of primary school age (7–13 years) and secondary school age (14–18 years) attending an educational institution by province, 2009
2009
99 20 99
Northern Cape 83
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0.85
1996
2001 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Disparity in favour of girls
Gender parity achieved
0.95 0.90
40
99
Western Cape 82
Gender Parity Index (GPI) in primary and secondary education, 1997–2009
Percentage of children attending an educational institution by age, 1996; 2001 and 2009
Near universal primary education has been achieved in all provinces
South Africa 89
Gender parity has been achieved both in primary and secondary education
0.80
Disparity in favour of boys
Secondary education
Primary education
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Age Source: Statistics South Africa (1998; 2003; 2010). Census 1996; Census 2001; General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
98 North West 87
Source: The Presidency (2010). Development Indicators 2009.
98 Eastern Cape 87 99 KwaZulu-Natal 87 99 Free State 90 98 Mpumalanga 90 99 Gauteng 92 99 Limpopo 94 20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
© UNICEF/Giacomo Pirozzi
0%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o E a r l y C h i l d h o o d D e v e l o p m e n t a n d E d u c a t i o n 4 3
Disability is a serious barrier to access basic education 10% of children with disabilities do not attend school
Percentage of children with disabilities 7–15 years old not attending an educational institution by province, 2009
Limpopo
12%
Gauteng
North West
12%
15%
Free State Northern Cape
7%
Mpumalanga
7%
KwaZulu-Natal
8%
27%
Percentage
Eastern Cape
≤ 5%
8%
5.1 – 10% 10.1 – 15% 15.1 – 20%
Western Cape
2%
© UNICEF/Giacomo Pirozzi
> 20.1%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). Selected development indicators – A discussion document sourced from the General Household Survey, 2009.
4 4 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Average for South Africa = 10
Nationwide, some 662,000 children are out of primary and secondary school Number of children of primary/secondary school age not attending an educational institution, 2009
Lack of money is the most important reason why children are not attending school Reasons for children (7–18 years old) not attending school, 2009
Number of children not attending school
600,000
No money for fees Education is useless or not interesting
582,000 500,000
13% 28%
5%
300,000
5% 5%
200,000
6%
100,000 80,000 0
Children of primary school age
15% 6%
6%
7%
Children of secondary school age
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Percentage of learners attending public schools (primary/secondary) who do not pay school fees by province, 2009
South Africa
Unable to perform at school
4%
400,000
Yet 1 in 2 learners in public schools receive free education
Pregnancy Completed/satisfied with level of education Working at home or business/job Illness
Western Cape Mpumalanga Gauteng
Disability Family commitment (e.g.child minding) Failed exams
KwaZulu-Natal North West
Other Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Northern Cape Limpopo Eastern Cape Free State 0%
55
45
40 33 41
31
43 29 46 35 48 30 53
49
67 66 77
59
80 77 10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Primary school Secondary school
© UNICEF/Giacomo Pirozzi
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o E a r l y C h i l d h o o d D e v e l o p m e n t a n d E d u c a t i o n 4 5
Repetition rates are high, especially in Grade 10 and Grade 11
Efficiency and Quality of the Education System
Female learners generally have lower repetition rates than male learners
Percentage of learners who repeat the same grade by sex of learners and by grade, 2009 20
15% of secondary-school-age children attend primary school because of late entry or grade repetition
15
Percentage
10 7
6
8
7
9
8 6
6
7
4
5
10
10
10
5
8
9
7
7 5
4
7
6
5
9
8
8 5
6
6
8
9 7
4
9
Western Cape
12
Free State
0
13
North West KwaZulu-Natal
14
Northern Cape
14
Children in the poorest households are more likely to repeat the same grade
16
Mpumalanga
Repetition rates in primary and secondary school by household income quintile, 2009
24
Eastern Cape 5%
10%
Grade R/0 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
15
Limpopo
0%
Female
12
15
Gauteng
Male
16 16 16
15
Percentage of children of secondary school age (14–18 years) attending primary school (Grade 1–7) by province, 2009 South Africa
Total
18 17
15%
20%
15
25%
Primary school 14
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Secondary school
13
12
Percentage
11 10
9 9 7 6
6
6 4
3
2 0
Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
4 6 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Violence at school is a barrier to quality education 27% of high school learners feel unsafe at school while 16% have been threatened with a weapon
Percentage of high school learners who have been threatened/injured with a weapon; felt unsafe at school by province, 2008 South Africa Gauteng KwaZulu-Natal Free State Eastern Cape Limpopo Western Cape Mpumalanga
16
27
14
23
15
27
16 20 16 33 16 28 16 25 17 28 17
North West Northern Cape
28 18
0%
30 5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Threatened with a weapon Felt unsafe at school
Š UNICEF/Giacomo Pirozzi
Source: Medical Research Council (2010). Youth Risk Behaviour Survey 2008.
C h i l d r e n â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s R i g h t s t o E a r l y C h i l d h o o d D e v e l o p m e n t a n d E d u c a t i o n 4 7
Grade 3 learners’ achievement in national assessments is generally very poor
South Africa’s Grade 6 learner achievement levels are poor compared to many other countries in the region
Average percentage scores of learners in literacy and numeracy in Grade 3 Systemic Evaluations by province, 2001 and 2007
Average reading and mathematics scores for Grade 6 learners in SACMEQ countries, 2007
Not achieved 30
North West
35
31
38
KwaZulu-Natal
38
Gauteng
32 29
33 20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0%
South Africa
42 42
Uganda
482 479
Mozambique
478 476
20%
40%
60%
Mean numeracy percentage score
2001 literacy
2001 numeracy
2007 literacy
2007 numeracy
80%
100%
Zambia Malawi 400
520
497
Reading Mathematics
477 468
Lesotho
49
535
495 495
32
Western Cape
Mean literacy percentage score
Namibia
557
534 508
471
36
Free State 48
486
Zimbabwe
31
27
Western Cape
521
Zanzibar
34 36
33
43
543
Botswana
29
35
541 549
Kenya
25
Eastern Cape
35
Outstanding achievement
25
623
574
Swaziland
29 31
24
Gauteng
0%
Northern Cape
Mauritius
26 24
Mpumalanga
29
KwaZulu-Natal
Free State
Outstanding achievement
34
Satisfactory achievement
32 23
North West Eastern Cape
Partial achievement
28
Mpumalanga Northern Cape
Limpopo
578 575
35
Satisfactory achievement
27 29
Limpopo
551
Seychelles
30
South Africa
36
Partial achievement
South Africa
553
Tanzania
Not achieved
National 2014 target for Maths = 520
435 434 434
447 450
500
550
600
650
Average scores
Note: Attainment score bands: Not achieved: 0–34; Partial achievement: 35–49; Satisfactory achievement: 50–69; Outstanding achievement: 70–100. Source: Department of Education (2005; 2008). National Protocol on Assessment; Grade 3 Systematic Evaluation Report.
Note: A linear transformation of the reading and mathematics scores was undertaken that resulted in the mean and standard deviation of pupil scores being 500 and 100, respectively (for the pooled data with equal weight given to each country). As a result, a score of 500 is equal to the average of all country mean scores. Source: Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality (2010). SACMEQ III Project Results: Pupil achievement levels in reading and mathematics.
4 8 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Children living in poor households have lower achievement levels in school Girls tend to perform better than boys
Average reading and mathematics scores for South African Grade 6 learners in SACMEQ assessment by pupil sex, and socioeconomic status (SES), 2007
Children in the poorest households are nearly 3 times less likely to complete secondary schooling than children in the richest households
Completion of primary and secondary schooling Over 90% of youth has completed primary schooling. Yet, only 40% has finished secondary schooling
Percentage of youth (20–24 years old) who have completed primary/secondary education by province, 2009
Percentage of youth (20–24 years old) who have completed primary/secondary education by province, 2009
Reading
80
Mathematics
74 Percentage
Mean score
650
87
600
606
National 2014 target for Maths = 520
550
579
Eastern Cape 26
491
506
498
423
Girls
Poorest 25%
50 40
20
446
38 29
26
91 North West 37
400 Boys
60
88 Northern Cape 32
500 484
98
96
92
90
89
92 South Africa 40
450
100
0
Richest 25%
92
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
Secondary school
KwaZulu-Natal 42 Source: Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality (2010). SACMEQ III Project Results: Pupil achievement levels in reading and mathematics.
Poorest 20%
Primary school
92 Limpopo 26
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
94 Gauteng 53 94 Free State 40 94 Mpumalanga 37 96 Western Cape 50 0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Primary school Secondary school Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o E a r l y C h i l d h o o d D e v e l o p m e n t a n d E d u c a t i o n 4 9
The Right to Parental or Family Care
Children’s Rights to a Family Environment and Alternative Care
Rights CRC, Article 5: States Parties shall respect the responsibilities, rights and duties of parents or, where applicable, the members of the extended family or community as provided for by local custom, legal guardians or other persons legally responsible for the child, to provide, in a manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child, appropriate direction and guidance in the exercise by the child of the rights recognised in the present Convention.
ensure the development of institutions, facilities and services for the care of children. Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Article 18, 19 and 20. SA Constitution Section 28(1): Every child has the right … (b) to family care or parental care.
CRC, Article 7(1): The child shall … have … as far as possible, the right to know and be cared for by his or her parents.
CRC, Article 18: 1. States Parties shall use their best efforts to ensure recognition of the principle that both parents have common responsibilities for the upbringing and development of the child. Parents or, as the case may be, legal guardians, have the primary responsibility for the upbringing and development of the child. The best interests of the child will be their basic concern. 2. For the purpose of guaranteeing and promoting the rights set forth in the present Convention, States Parties shall render appropriate assistance to parents and legal guardians in the performance of their child-rearing responsibilities and shall
5 0 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
© UNICEF/Rebecca Hearfield
CRC, Article 8(1): States Parties undertake to respect the right of the child to preserve his or her identity, including nationality, name and family relations as recognised by law without unlawful interference.
The majority of children (80%) not living with either parent reside with their grandparents or relatives
Percentage of children living in the same household with both their biological parents; their mother only; their father only; or neither biological parent by province, 2009
Child’s relationship to head of the household when both biological parents are absent, 2009
29
4
15
Gauteng 50
31
4
15
Grandchild
Free State 34
36
27
Northern Cape 31
41
Other relative (e.g. in-laws or aunt/uncle)
North West 30
35
Mpumalanga 28
42
KwaZulu-Natal 25
43
Limpopo 23
45
Eastern Cape 21
39
South Africa 32
38
0%
20% Both parents
40% Mother only
25
3
4
28
2
30
2,000,000
19
(Step-) brother or sister Stepchild or adopted child
9
26
4
Total number of children who have lost one or both parents due to AIDS, 2000–2009
61
9
31
4
1.9 million children have lost one or both parents due to AIDS
Non-related persons
1
Head/acting head
1
AIDS orphans
Western Cape 52
3
The AIDS epidemic is an important driver of the growing number of orphans
4
26
60%
80%
Father only
0%
100%
1,000,000
500,000
36
3
1,500,000
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0
Neither parent
Note: Numbers may not add up to 100 due to rounding.
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
1 in 5 children have lost one or both parents Number and percentage of children who have lost one or both parents due to all causes by province, 2009
Percentage of children not living with either parent; who have lost one or both parents due to all causes by household income quintile, 2009
18%
Gauteng
13%
423,875
404,070 North West
19%
35
Mpumalanga
30
22%
322,280
Free State
23%
240,540
33
Not living with either parent
Lost one or both parents
29
25
KwaZuluNatal
Percentage
243,000
15%
Source: UNAIDS (2010) Estimates.
Poor children are less likely to live with their biological parents Limpopo
Northern Cape
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Only 1 in 3 children live with both biological parents
25%
1,058,745
24 20
23
23
17
15
66,730
Eastern Cape
Percentage of children who have lost a parent
687,045
≤ 10%
25%
Western Cape Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
8%
10.1 – 15 %
18 12
10
8
5 0
5 Poorest 20%
Second 20%
Middle 20%
Fourth 20%
Richest 20%
15.1 – 20%
147,155 Average for South Africa = 19% Total numbers for South Africa = 3,593,440
> 20%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o a F a m i l y E n v i r o n m e n t a n d A l t e r n a t i v e C a r e 5 1
The Right to Alternative Care in the Absence of Family Care
Over 88,600 children were declared in need of care by a children’s court during 2009/10 These children can be placed in foster care, in a children’s home, in a school of industry or back into the parents’ or guardians’ care, under the supervision of a social worker. Orphaned and abandoned children may also be adopted.
Number of children declared to be in need of care and protection by a children’s court, 2006/07–2009/10 100,000
Rights
CRC, Article 25: States Parties recognise the right of a child who has been placed by the competent authorities for the purposes of care, protection or treatment of his or her physical or mental health, to a periodic review of the treatment provided to the child and all other circumstances relevant to his or her placement. Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Articles 24 and 25. SA Constitution Section 28(1): Every child has the right … (b) to … appropriate alternative care when removed from the family environment.
88,619 80,000 60,051
60,000 Number
CRC, Article 20(1);(2) and (3): (1) A child temporarily or permanently deprived of his or her family environment, or in whose own best interests cannot be allowed to remain in that environment, shall be entitled to special protection and assistance provided by the State. (2) States Parties shall in accordance with their national laws ensure alternative care for such a child. (3) Such care could include, inter alia, foster placement, kafalah of Islamic law, adoption or if necessary placement in suitable institutions for the care of children. When considering solutions, due regard shall be paid to the desirability of continuity in a child’s upbringing and to the child’s ethnic, religious, cultural and linguistic background.
40,000
33,408
32,776
20,000
0
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
Close to 500,000 children live with foster parents and benefit from the Foster Child Grant Number of Foster Child Grants by province, Jan. 2011
14,420
Northern Cape
20,805
Western Cape
25,830
Mpumalanga
38,390
North West
40,830
Free State
51,920
Limpopo
58,510
Gauteng
101,760
Eastern Cape
127,970
KwaZulu-Natal 0
5 2 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Source: Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (2007–2010). Annual Reports 2006/07–2009/10.
30,000
60,000
90,000
120,000
150,000
Source: South African Social Security Agency (2011). Statistical Report No. 38 on Social Grants (January 2011).
The number of adoptions has increased to over 5,850 annually
Approximately 13,250 children stay in registered child and youth care centres. The number of children in unregistered centres is unknown.
Number of adoptions and intercountry adoptions dealt with in children’s courts, 2006/07–2009/10
Number of children in registered child and youth care centres by centre type, 2010 12,000 10,400
6,000 5,853
Adoptions 5,000
Intercountry adoptions
10,000
5,217 8,000
3,779
3,757
Number
Number
4,000 3,000
4,000
2,000 1,003
1,000 0
Note: This number is equivalent to only 76% of the total capacity of registered child and youth care centres, but 95% of the total number of children accommodated on the last weekday night during the time of the survey.
6,000
845
608
1,550
2,000
1,300
No data 2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
0
2009/10
Children's homes
Places of safety
Source: Department of Social Development, UNICEF (2010). Baseline Study on Registered Child and Youth Care Centres.
Shelters
Source: Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (2007–2010). Annual Reports 2006/07–2009/10.
Close to half of children (45%) are admitted to registered child and youth care centres because of abandonment or neglect Main reason for admission of child to registered child and youth care centres, 2010
1%
15%
Abandoned or neglected Abused
3%
Orphaned
4% 45%
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
5%
Living/working on street Illness of parent or guardian Unaccompanied minor In trouble with the law
14% 14%
Other
Source: Department of Social Development, UNICEF (2010). Baseline Study on Registered Child and Youth Care Centres.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o a F a m i l y E n v i r o n m e n t a n d A l t e r n a t i v e C a r e 5 3
Registered child and youth care centres are not equitably distributed across the country Number of registered child and youth care centres by province, type, and per 100,000 child population, 2010
The Right to be Protected from all Forms of Violence Rights
54
CRC, Article 19: States Parties shall take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social and educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation, including sexual abuse, while in the care of parent(s), legal guardian(s) or any other person who has the care of the child.
Number of centres per province Shelters Places of safety
Limpopo 0.7
Homes Centres per 100,000 children
12
<1
38
1.1 - 2
3
2.1 - 3 > 3.1
0
Gauteng 2.3
5
14
3
43
7
3
9
5
CRC, Article 34: States Parties undertake to protect the child from all forms of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse.
2
Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Article 16.
Mpumalanga 1.0
North West 0.5 8
8 1
1
Northern Cape
9 5
3 Free State 4.9
KwaZulu-Natal 1.3
2.5
JCPS Delivery Agreement, Output 3.1: Address overall levels of crime and reduce the levels of contact and trio crimes.
19 5
8
Key target by 2014:
Eastern Cape 1.2
4
• Reduce reported serious crimes from 3,924 (1,910,847 crimes) to at least 3,767 per 100,000 people.
Western Cape 2.3 Source: Department of Social Development, UNICEF (2010). Baseline Study on Registered Child and Youth Care Centres.
5 4 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Section 28(1): Every child has the right … (d) to be protected from maltreatment, neglect, abuse or degradation. National targets
32
5
SA Constitution
• Reduce contact crimes from 1,407 (685,185 crimes) to 930 per 100,000 people whilst reducing trio crimes from 97,1 (47,273 crimes) to 67 per 100,000 people.
Violence against children is pervasive in South Africa Over 56,500 children were reported to be victims of violent crime in 2009/10, yet many more crimes remain unreported. People closest to them perpetrate the majority of cases of child sexual and physical abuse
Reported crimes against children by crime category, 2006/07–2009/10
Over 4,000 cases of child neglect or ill-treatment are reported to the police annually Reported cases of neglect and ill-treatment of children by province, 2009/10
25,428
All sexual offences
0
2006/07
14,982 12,062
2007/08
2008/09
17.2
847
15.8
Free State
450
15.5
1,057
10.0
270
7.8
Eastern Cape
356
5.4
Mpumalanga
164
4.5
KwaZulu-Natal
455
4.4
Limpopo
218
4.2
4,014
8.1
Source: South African Police Service (2010). Crime Situation in South Africa.
South Africa
Source: South African Police Service (2010). Crime Statistics: April 2009 – March 2010.
The number of cases of neglect and ill-treatment reported to the police has decreased since 2003 Number of reported cases of neglect and ill-treatment of children, 2003/04–2009/10
12,000
8,000
10,967 (40%)
10,000
8,061 (29%)
8,390 (31%)
7,000 Reported cases
Reported cases
197
Western Cape
North West
29% of all sexual offences against children involve children aged 0–10 years old
6,000
Northern Cape
Gauteng
Sexual offences are often committed against young children
8,000
Ratio per 100,000 population
Attempted murder
2009/10
Reported sexual offences against children by age group, 2009/10
Reported cases
Common assault
Murder
1,113 965
782 843
889 972
5,000
14,544 12,422
10,000
Assault GBH
852 1,015
15,000
16,091 13,625
16,871 13,947
20,000
20,141
22,124
25,000
27,417
30,000
4,000
6,504
6,000
5,568 4,828
5,000
4,258
4,106
4,034
4,014
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
4,000 3,000 2,000
2,000
1,000 0
0-10 years
11-14 years
Source: South African Police Service (2010). Crime Situation in South Africa.
15-17 years
0
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
2006/07
Source: South African Police Service (2010). Crime Statistics: April 2009 – March 2010.
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o a F a m i l y E n v i r o n m e n t a n d A l t e r n a t i v e C a r e 5 5
Children’s Rights to Special Protection
The Right to Special Protection When in Conflict with the Law Rights CRC, Article 40: (1) States Parties recognise the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognised as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child‘s sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child’s respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child’s age and the desirability of promoting the child’s reintegration and the child’s assuming a constructive role in society …. Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Articles 15, 27, 28 and 29. SA Constitution Section 28(1): Every child has the right … (g) to not to be detained except as a measure of last resort, in which case … the child may be detained only for the shortest appropriate period of time, and has the right to be (i) kept separately from detained persons over the age of 18 years; and (ii) treated in a manner, and kept in conditions, that take account of the child’s age.
5 6 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Some facts on children in conflict with the law: • On average, between 9,000 and 13,000 children are arrested by the South African Police Service on a monthly basis. • Approximately 4,500 to 5,000 cases per month are converted into Children’s Court Inquiries in terms of the Child Care Act, 1983 (Act 74 of 1983). Of the remaining numbers of children in the criminal justice system, between 3,000 and 5,500 children go through the courts on a monthly basis. • On average, 1,900 children per month are diverted from the mainstream criminal justice system. This means that where a child acknowledges wrong-doing, the prosecutor provisionally withdraws charges, on condition that the child attends diversion programmes such as life skills and anger management programmes. Source: Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (2008). Annual Report 2007/08.
Approximately 33,000 children awaited trial in detention during 2008/09
The number of children in correctional facilities has decreased substantially
Number of children in conflict with the law awaiting trial by place of detention, 2008/09
Average number of children detained in correctional service facilities by sentence status at any given point, 2003–2010
20,000 16,970
1,810
2003
2,334 1,710
2004
15,000
1,923 1,237 1,336
Number
2005 1,099
2006
10,000
1,149
8,649
895
2007
1,166
5,871 5,000
2008
No data available
2009
No data available
2010*
290
Unsentenced
1,343 0
Secure care centres
Home-based supervision
Correctional service facilities
Places of safety
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Number Note: 2010 data refers to children in detention on the last day of October 2010, while 2003–2007 data refers to the average number of children in detention at any given point within that year. Source: Department of Correctional Services (2008). Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Children in Conflict with the Law (2003–2007 data) and DCS Statistical Information at http://www.dcs.gov.za/AboutUs/StatisticalInformation.aspx (2010 data).
© UNICEF/Giacomo Pirozzi
Source: National Treasury (2009). Provincial Budgets and Expenditure Review 2005/06 – 2011/12. Annexure B: Nonfinancial (performance) information.
Sentenced
632
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o S p e c i a l P r o t e c t i o n 5 7
The Right to Special Protection in Situations of Exploitation Rights
CRC, Article 33: States Parties shall take all appropriate measures, including legislative, administrative, social and educational measures, to protect children from the illicit use of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances as defined in the relevant international treaties and to prevent the use of children in the illicit production and trafficking of such substances. CRC, Article 34: States Parties undertake to protect the child from all forms of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. For these purposes, States Parties shall in particular take all appropriate national, bilateral and multilateral measures to prevent: (a) The inducement or coercion of a child to engage in any unlawful sexual activity; (b) The exploitative use of children in prostitution or other unlawful sexual practices; (c) The exploitative use of children in pornographic performances and materials.
5 8 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
CRC, Article 35: States Parties shall take all appropriate national, bilateral and multilateral measures to prevent the abduction of, the sale of or traffic in children for any purpose or in any form. CRC, Article 36: States Parties shall protect the child against all other forms of exploitation prejudicial to any aspects of the child’s welfare. Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Articles 15, 27, 28 and 29. SA Constitution Section 28. Every child has the right … (e) to be protected from exploitative labour practices; (f) not to be required or permitted to perform work or provide services that – (i) are inappropriate for a person of that child’s age; or (ii) place at risk the child’s well-being, education, physical or mental health or spiritual, moral or social development.
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
CRC, Article 32: (1) States Parties recognise the right of the child to be protected from economic exploitation and from performing any work that is likely to be hazardous or to interfere with the child’s education, or to be harmful to the child’s health or physical, mental, spiritual, moral or social development.
No recent data on child labour is available for South Africa. A 1999 survey found that 36% of children above 5 years of age were engaged in at least one form of work activity Percentage of children aged 5–17 years engaged in children’s work activities (higher cut-off points), 1999 South Africa 36
More than 1 in 10 high school learners has taken at least one illegal drug such as dagga, heroin, or cocaine before Percentage of high school learners (in Grades 8–11) who have ever used illegal drugs, 2008
Ever used dagga 13
Gauteng 12 North West 21
Ever used mandrax 7
Western Cape 24 KwaZulu-Natal 35 Free State 36 Limpopo 40 Mpumalanga 44 Easten Cape 60 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Source: Department of Labour and Statistics South Africa (2001). Survey of Activities of Young People (SAYP), 1999.
Source: Medical Research Council (2010). The 2nd South African National Youth Risk Behaviour Survey 2008.
Ever used cocaine 7 Ever used heroin 6 Ever used over-the-counter/prescription drugs 12 Ever taken drugs like heroin, mandrax, sugars, tik 12 0%
5%
10%
15%
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Note: To be classified as engaged in work, a child would have been involved in at least one activity, according to the following cut-off points: three hours per week for economic activities, seven hours per week for household chores, and five hours per week for school maintenance.
Northern Cape 23
C h i l d r e n ’s R i g h t s t o S p e c i a l P r o t e c t i o n 5 9
The Right to Birth Registration
Percentage of births registered within year of birth, 1998–2009
Rights CRC, Article 7: The child shall be registered immediately after birth and shall have the right from birth to a name, the right to acquire a nationality and, as far as possible, the right to know and be cared for by his or her parents. Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Article 6.
100
80
80
82
85
72 66
60
51
57
44 38
40
SA Constitution Section 28(a): Every child has the right to a name and nationality from birth.
Target = 100 88
Percentage
The Civil Rights and Freedoms of Children
Birth registration has improved steadily over the past decade
31 25
20
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Source: Statistics South Africa (2007). Coverage and quality of birth registration 1998–2005; Statistics South Africa (2010). Recorded live births, 2009.
The lowest levels of birth registration are found in predominantly rural provinces Percentage of births registered within year of birth by province, 2005
South Africa 72 KwaZulu-Natal 62 Easten Cape 66 North West 67 Limpopo 67 Mpumalanga 70 Free State 75 Gauteng 81 Northern Cape 82 Western Cape 97 0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2007) Coverage and quality of birth registration 1998–2005.
6 0 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
Though prohibited by law, nearly 1 in 5 children experience corporal punishment at school
Children in the poorest households are more likely to experience corporal punishment by teachers
Percentage of children attending school experiencing corporal punishment by teachers by province, 2009
Percentage of children attending school experiencing corporal punishment by teachers by household income quintile, 2009 25
South Africa 17 Western Cape 3
Also see African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, Article 20(1)(c); 21(1). SA Constitution Section 12: Everyone has the right to freedom and security of the person, which includes the right … (c) to be free from all forms of violence from either public or private sources; … (d) not to be tortured in any way; and … (e) not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way. Section 28(d): Every child has the right to be protected from maltreatment, neglect, abuse or degradation.
Percentage
CRC, Article 17: No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Gauteng 12 North West 13 Limpopo 15 Free State 20
15
16
10
10
5
KwaZulu-Natal 24
4
Eastern Cape 25 0%
21 19
Mpumalanga 8
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009.
0
Poorest 20% Second 20% Middle 20%
Fourth 20% Richest 20%
Source: Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Analysis by UNICEF South Africa.
1 in 3 parents use severe corporal punishment in the form of beatings Percentage of parents who smack their children with their hand; beat their children with a strap, belt, stick or similar object, 2005 60 50 Gini coefficient
Rights
20
Northern Cape 6
57
40 33
30
© UNICEF/Karin Schermbrucker
The Right to Protection From Corporal Punishment and Other Cruel or Degrading Forms of Punishment
20 10 0
% of parents who smack their children
% of parents who beat their children with a strap, belt or stick
Source: Dawes, A., De Sas Kropiwnicki, Z., Kafaar, Z. and Richter, L. (2005). Corporal punishment of children: a South African national survey.
The Civil Rights and Freedoms of Children 61
Technical Note While South Africa is a relatively data-rich country, published statistics usually focus on the entire population or on households, not specifically on children. Additional analysis of the raw General Household Survey (GHS) 2009 dataset was therefore undertaken to collate disaggregated statistics using children as the unit of analysis. The GHS was selected because of its sample size, annual frequency and the topics it covers. This note provides a brief description of the dataset and main approaches followed during the analysis.
Description of the GHS1 The GHS is a household survey that has been executed annually by Stats SA since 2002. It is designed to measure multiple facets of the living conditions of South African households and covers six broad areas, namely: education, health, social development, housing, household access to services and facilities, food security and agriculture. The survey covers private households in all nine provinces of South Africa, and residents in workers’ hostels. A household is defined as a person, or group of persons, who occupy a common dwelling unit (or part of it) for at least four nights in a week on average during the past four weeks prior to the survey interview. The survey does not cover other collective living quarters such as students’ hostels, old age homes, hospitals, prisons and military barracks. The GHS is therefore only representative of non-institutionalised and non-military persons or households in South Africa. These exclusions, however, should not have a noticeable impact on the findings in respect of children. The sample design for the GHS 2009 was based on a master sample that was originally designed for the QLFS and was used for the first time for the GHS in 2008. The sample was stratified first by province and then by district council. A total of 25,303 households were successfully interviewed during the face-toface interviews conducted in July, August and September 2009. Information was captured on 94,263 persons, including 35,494 children under the age of 18 years.
Analysing the GHS 2009 The GHS 2009 data are available in two separate data files that can be accessed and downloaded from StatsOnline at www.statssa.gov.za. The ‘Person’ file contains demographic information (sex, age, population group, etc.) and biographical information (education, health, social grants, and economic activities) of every member in the household. The ‘House’ file contains household information (housing, water and sanitation, electricity, environmental issues, services, etc.) and data on food security, household income sources and expenditure. The microdata files also contain a number of derived variables calculated by 1 Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009: Metadata.
6 2 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Technical Note Stats SA, as well as household and person weights. Data were analysed using the software package SPSS Statistics 17.0. An important part of the equity analysis for this Report entailed disaggregating data by economic status in order to compare the situation of the poorest and the richest children. From the spectrum of indicators of economic status, household income was selected as the indicator of choice. The analysis relied on a derived variable on estimated total household income that was included in the ‘House’ file by Stats SA. This derived variable is a combination of total reported earnings, income from social grants, and income from remittances. Stats SA combined estimated monthly incomes of R20,000 and higher as the questionnaire was not designed to capture incomes from more complex sources such as rentals, interest, etc. that are typical of higher income households. Data on total household income was missing for 8.4 per cent of households. When analysing inequality, ignoring households with unspecified household income can lead to biased results. A method called multiple imputation was therefore applied at household level to deal with missing values. The imputation model used the following variables as predictors of household income: province, race and sex of the household head, dwelling type, fuel for cooking, sanitation, water source, refuse removal, telephone, internet connection, means of transport, and economically active household members. The model was run 15 times and the imputed datasets were pooled to provide estimates that are generally more accurate than they would be with only one imputation. Next, household income was converted into per capita income in order to compensate for differences in household size. All households were then ordered by household per capita income, and the distribution was divided into quintiles each containing 20% of households. Each household was assigned a quintile score with 1 referring to the poorest 20% of households, and 5 referring to the richest 20 % of households. Finally, the data from the two separate data files (‘House’ and ‘Person’) were linked on the basis of a unique household identifier (UqNr), pre-classified by Stats SA, in order to allow for extensive analysis using children as the unit of analysis. All records with a given unique household identifier, no matter which file they are in, belong to the same household. This means that common household data, for example, on access to water or the quintile category, was applied to each individual household member in the merged dataset. Tabulations were then produced for the child indicators presented in this Report. Throughout the analysis, weights provided by Stats SA were applied to give representative estimates by province, population group and gender.
63
References Actuarial Society of South Africa (2005). ASSA2003 AIDS and Demographic Model.
Department of Education (2008). Grade 3 Systematic Evaluation Report. Pretoria: Department of Education.
Central Intelligence Agency (2009). The World Factbook 2009.
Department of Education (2011). Education for All (EFA) Country Report South Africa, 2010.
Chopra M, Daviaud E, Pattinson R, Fonn S, Lawn J (2009). Saving the Lives of South Africa’s Mothers, Babies, and Children: Can the Health System Deliver? The Lancet, Volume 374, Issue 9692, Pages 835–846. Coetzee M, (2010). ‘Finding the Benefits – Evaluating the Impact of the South African Child Support Grant.’ Stellenbosch University.
Department of Health (2008). South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Full Report. Pretoria: Department of Health.
Committee on the Rights of the Child (2003). General Comment No. 3: HIV/ AIDS and the Rights of the Child.
Department of Health (2010). National Strategic Plan for HIV and AIDS / Comprehensive HIV and AIDS Treatment Plan Statistics, May 2010.
Committee on the Rights of the Child (2006). General Comment No. 7: Implementing Child Rights in Early Childhood.
Department of Health (2010). National Antenatal Sentinel HIV and Syphilis Prevalence Survey 2009, South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Health.
Dawes A, De Sas Kropiwnicki Z, Kafaar Z and Richter L (2005). Corporal Punishment of Children: A South African National Survey. Cape Town: Child Youth and Family Development, Human Sciences Research Council.
Department of Health, Medical Research Council, University of Pretoria, UNICEF, Save the Children (2008). Every Death Counts: Saving the Lives of South Africa’s Mothers, Babies and Children.
Day C, Monticelli F, Barron P, Haynes R, Smith J and Sello E (eds) (2010). The District Health Barometer 2008/09. Durban: Health Systems Trust. Department of Correctional Services (2008). Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Children in Conflict with the Law. Department of Education (2005). The National Protocol on Assessment for Schools in the General and Further Education and Training Band (Grades R–12).
6 4 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Department of Health (2002). South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 1998. Full Report. Pretoria: Department of Health.
Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (2007). Annual Report 2006/07. Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (2008). Annual Report 2007/08. Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (2009). Annual Report 2008/09. Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (2010). Annual Report 2009/10.
Department of Labour and Statistics South Africa (2001). Survey of Activities of Young People (SAYP), 1999. Pretoria : Statistics South Africa. Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (2010). Delivery Agreement for Outcome 1: Improved Quality of Basic Education. Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (2010). Delivery Agreement for Outcome 2: A Long and Healthy Life for All South Africans. Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (2010). Delivery Agreement for Outcome 3: All People in South Africa Are and Feel Safe. Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (2010). Delivery Agreement for Outcome 4: Decent Employment through Inclusive Growth. Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (2010). Delivery Agreement for Outcome 7: Vibrant, Equitable and Sustainable Rural Communities and Food Security for All. Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (2010). Delivery Agreement for Outcome 8: Sustainable Human Settlements and Improved Quality of Household Life. Department of Social Development, UNICEF (Forthcoming). Baseline Study on Registered Child and Youth Care Centres. Finn, Leibbrandt and Woolard (2009). Income and Expenditure Inequality: Analysis of the NIDS Wave 1 Dataset. Fonn S, Padarath A (eds) (2010). South African Health Review 2010. Durban: Health Systems Trust.
References Jooste L, Weight M. and Lombard C. (2001). A national survey of the iodine content of household salt in South Africa. Bull WHO 2001; 79:534–540. Kibel M, Lake L, Pendlebury P and Smith C (eds) (2010). South African Child Gauge 2009/2010. Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town. Labadarios D and Van Middelkoop A (eds) (1995). Children aged 6–71 months in South Africa, 1994: Their anthropometric, Vitamin A, iron and immunisation coverage status. Johannesburg: South African Vitamin A Consultative Group (SAVACG). Labadarios D (ed) (2000). The National Food Consumption Survey (NFCS): Children aged 1–9 years, South Africa, 1999. Pretoria: Department of Health. Labadarios D (ed) (2007). The National Food Consumption Survey: Fortification Baseline (NFCS-FB). Stellenbosch: Department of Health. Leibbrandt M, Woolard I, Finn A and Argent J. (2010). ‘Trends in South African Income Distribution and Poverty since the Fall of Apartheid.’ OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No.101. National Treasury, Republic of South Africa (2009). Provincial Budget and Expenditure Review: 2005/06–2011/12. Pretoria: Government Printers. National Treasury, Republic of South Africa (2011). National Budget Review 2011. Pretoria: Government Printers. Reddy SP, James S, Sewpaul R, Koopman F, Funani NI, Sifunda S, Josie J, Masuka P, Kambaran NS, and Omardien RG. (2010). Umthente Uhlaba Usamila – The South African Youth Risk Behaviour
Survey 2008. Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council. Republic of South Africa (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Shisana O, Simbayi LC, Rehle T, Zungu NP, Zuma K Ngogo N, Jooste S, Pillay-van-Wyk V, Parker W, Pezi S, Nwanyanwu O, Dinh T and SABSSM III Implementation Team (2010). South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence, Behaviour and Communication Survey, 2008: The Health of Our Children. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
Statistics South Africa (1998). Census 1996. Statistics South Africa (2003). Census 2001. Statistics South Africa (2007). Coverage and Quality of Birth Registration 1998–2005. Statistics South Africa (2008). Community Survey 2007. Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009 Statistics South Africa (2010). General Household Survey 2009: Metadata.
Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi LC, Zuma K, Jooste S, Pillay-van-Wyk V, Mbelle N, Van Zyl J, Parker W, Zungu NP, Pezi S and the SABSSM III Implementation Team (2009). South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence, Behaviour and Communication Survey 2008: A Turning Tide among Teenagers? Cape Town: HSRC Press.
Statistics South Africa (2010). Mid-year Population Estimates, 2010.
South Africa Every Death Counts Writing Group (2008). Every Death Counts: Use of Mortality Audit Data for Decision Making To Save the Lives of Mothers, Babies and Children in South Africa. The Lancet, 371 (9620): 1294–1304.
The Presidency, Republic of South Africa (2010). Development Indicators 2010.
South African Police Service (2010). Crime Situation in South Africa. Crime Information Management South African Police Service.
UNICEF (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York: UNICEF.
South African Social Security Agency (2011). Statistical Report No. 38 on Social Grants (January 2011). Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality (2010). SACMEQ III Project Results: Pupil Achievement Levels in Reading and Mathematics.
Statistics South Africa (2010). Recorded Live Births, 2009. Statistics South Africa (2010). Selected Development Indicators – A Discussion Document Sourced from the General Household Survey, 2009.
UNAIDS (2010). Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. UNAIDS (2011). AIDS Info Database.
WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and World Bank (2010). Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008. WHO/UNICEF (2009). Review of National Immunisation Coverage 1980–2008. Wright G, Noble M, Barnes H and Noble S (2009). The South African Index of Multiple Deprivation for Children 2007 at Municipality Level. Pretoria: Department of Social Development.
65
Database on Child Rights Indicators The database available in the CD-ROM attached to this report contains key indicators to monitor the fulfilment of child rights in South Africa. By installing the database on your computer, you are literally just a few mouse clicks away from: • Getting facts to help make better decisions based on evidence; • Analyzing national, provincial and district data for monitoring and evaluation purposes; • Producing high-quality tables, graphs and maps for inclusion in reports, presentations and advocacy materials. System requirements The recommended hardware requirements to install this software application are: • Pentium IV • 512 MB of RAM • 1 GB of free hard disk space • Display resolution 1024 x 768 • Microsoft Windows XP or above • Microsoft Office XP is recommended but not required. Installing the database To install the application on your computer, follow these steps: • Insert the CR-ROM into the CD drive. • Wait for Auto-run to launch the Setup screen. • Follow the instructions on the screen to complete setup. If the setup program does not load automatically, then do the following: • Click Start and then click Run. • Type d:\setup (where ‘d’ is the location of your CD drive) and press Enter. • Follow the instructions on the screen to complete setup. After installation, double-click on the desktop to start the application.
icon on your
To view the User’s Guide in .pdf format, click and select Help.
6 7 S O U T H A F R I C A’ S C H I L D R E N
Database on Child Rights Indicators