“She was a fierce and fearless advocate for honesty, social justice, fairness, and so much more” -Randall M. Miller, Ph.D. Remembering Catherine Murray
pg. 8-9
Feb. 3, 2016
The Student Newspaper of Saint Joseph’s University | Volume XCV | Est. 1929 | www.hawkhillnews.com
Good morning, graduates 2016 Commencement ceremonies change times MOLLY GRAB ’17 Editor in Chief
The sun sets over Hawk Hill on Jan. 30 as the snow from Winter Storm Jonas begins to melt away. (Photo by Joey Toczylowski ’19)
Online, out of mind
Effectiveness of virtual course evaluations questioned MAURA HOLCOMB ’17 Special to the Hawk In the fall of 2015, Saint Joseph’s University implemented a new online course evaluation system. The new system requires students to fill out course evaluations via Blackboard. At the end of each semester, students are given the opportunity and responsibility to fill out course evaluations for each of their classes. Course evaluations allow professors to gain feedback on their courses and their instruction, while also gathering information on students’ opinions of the course as a whole. The new online system was put into place to expedite the retrieval of student responses. According to Andy Starr, director of Faculty Engagement, Innovation, and Technology Management and member of the ad hoc committee on course evaluations, his biggest concern while working on the committee was changing the interface to make the system more user-friendly. He added that an easier system to navi-
gate would encourage students to submit an evaluation. The problem for many students, however, was that they had no idea course evaluations had moved online. Angelo Hastie, ’17, was one of those students who had been uninformed. According to Hastie, being in a classroom setting where a professor is issuing the evaluation garnered greater results because everyone was participating. “There is no real motivation to fill out an online evaluation,” Hastie said. Many committee members agree that one of the biggest stipulations facing the new system is actually motivating students to take the time to complete an evaluation. In terms of online course evaluations, the results tend to come from students on two separate ends of the spectrum: students who had either a completely positive or completely negative experience. It is argued that in-class evaluations offer a more diverse perspective, because students are required to complete the form in the presence of both their professor and their peers.
“A student is more likely to fill out an [online] evaluation if they didn’t like your class,” said Jason Mezey, Ph.D., associate professor of English. The new system was implemented with many perks in mind. It allows students taking online courses to submit a course evaluation, which was never an option in previous years. The online evaluations were also expected to expedite the process of compiling the statistics and getting them to the faculty in a timely fashion so that professors could use that feedback before the semester comes to an end. However, Paul Aspan, Ph.D., associate provost for Academic and Faculty Support and another member of the committee in charge of coordinating the transition, explained that “the unanticipated problem with the new system is getting the information back to the faculty.” At this time, the university will continue to utilize the online course evaluation system.
Photo by Matthew J. Haubenstein, M.A. ’17
The Saint Joseph’s University class of 2016 will graduate under white tents on Maguire Campus. The ceremony will progress as usual—with one important change. The 2016 undergraduate commencement ceremony will now take place at nine a.m. on May 14. Traditionally, the undergraduate ceremony has taken place at three p.m., but with the adjusted time, the Doctoral, Graduate, Professional and Liberal Studies, and Haub Degree Completion Commencement ceremony will fill the afternoon timeslot. Students were alerted of this change via an email from the Office of the President on Jan. 29. In the email, University President Mark C. Reed, Ed.D., explained,“moving the ceremony to the morning provides some additional flexibility.” Reed noted that this time change will help graduating students make special travel arrangements and celebrate with their families. Jeanne Brady, Ph.D., interim provost, said in a statement that by switching the time of the undergraduate ceremony to nine a.m., the university will have more time to properly set up for the graduate ceremony at three p.m. Cary Anderson, vice president of Student Life and associate provost, added that the final decision was made by Reed and the commencement committee. Though the Commencement exercise itself will remain untouched, some seniors are concerned about the schedule change. “It’s kind of just inconvenient, honestly, for those people who have to travel,” said Kelly Phelan, ’16. “Now they have to get up at what? Six o’clock, seven o’clock? And get there early and find parking? … I’m sure there was a valid reason, but I think it’s a little inconvenient for the graduates and their families.” Though this year’s commencement will be a transition for students and their families, Brady confirmed in a statement that the undergraduate ceremony will continue to be held at nine a.m. from this point forward. “We believe this adjustment in the schedule will provide students and their families the best experience possible on Commencement weekend,” Brady wrote.