The Hawk (10/8/14)

Page 1

An exclusive look at the upcoming Paramount film “Men, Women, and Children” - Pg.11

THE HAWK THE HAWK September 24, 2014 October 8, 2014

The Student Newspaper of Saint Joseph’s University | Volume XCIII | Est. 1929 | www.hawkhillnews.com

Q&A with Chair of Board of Trustees A sit down with Edward Moneypenny ERIN RAFTERY ’15 News Editor

INTRODUCTION Q: What is it like for you to be stepping

into this position after what has been happening for the past three years at the university, especially last year? How are you going to make your role different here at the university? A: Well, I walked into this with my eyes wide open here…and you know I’m more oriented toward inclusive kind of things anyway as opposed to some other kind of management style or leadership style, so I just felt, background-wise and other organizations I’ve been in, and my desire to put this back together again so to speak, it’s a little dramatic, but it’s something that I really am interested in doing and if I could, along with others, do that, then I would have done something helpful to the university and that’s my motivating force…This is not a one-man thing or a Trustee thing; it’s a Trustee, it’s faculty, it’s administration, and in the middle of this triangle are the most important people in all of this, and they are our students.

ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS CHANGING Q: You did mention changing the culture here and how we can move forward with a fresh start, and as you’re aware, Fr. Gillespie and Mr. Smithson decided to resign, but I did want to clarify with you...I was wondering if there was any pressure on them; if they were going to be fired, or if they were

fired, what is the official [statement]? A: They decided this [to resign] on their own, and I think we’ve been all over that, so I have nothing more to say about that.

Q: Was their leaving [one of the solutions]

to the votes of no confidence that happened as well as the culture here? A: Well the votes of no confidence have nothing to do with this.

Q: With Mr. Smithson and Fr. Gillespie resigning? A: Yeah, they chose to do what they did. You’d have to ask them why they chose to do what they did. Q: Do you think it is a positive change, as far as what happened last year, that they will not be returning to the university? A: I think the university will decide how all that works.

Q: Lou Mayer is still here and a lot of fac-

ulty are upset about that because he was one of the people that had a vote of no confidence passed against him; and so I understand you can’t have everyone leave because you have no retention here at the university, but is that something on the table, to maybe evaluate his position? A: Well I’m not going to comment publicly about anybody here, regardless of the job they have. People in general get evaluated periodically, and we do that with the whole cabinet and this is no different than that.

A portrait of Edward Moneypenny. Photo courtesy of Saint Joseph’s University

Q: OK, so would you say having him here Q: Along with the shared governance,

is kind of detrimental in moving forward because of the financial issues? A: Well…I don’t think it’s detrimental. I think he’ll be a contributor, I expect him to be a contributor going forward, I expect all the cabinet to be contributors. There isn’t any difference, they all have to be contributors, and we periodically evaluate all of them.

UNIVERSITY ISSUES/SHARED GOVERNANCE

there was also an issue last year with communication regarding financial issues and other things like that. Does that fit in with the shared governance changes that are happening, having better communication, kind of like a two-way street between faculty, administrators, staff, students? A: Well all of this is geared to creating the two-way street, because the one-way street just doesn’t get it; it’s not in anybody’s best interest, so all of these are ways to communicate. You think about these small meetings with the faculty, what is that? Continued MONEYPENNY, Pg. 3

Presidential search commences: Are all voices heard? LEIGH ANNE TIFFANY ’15 Assistant News Editor

T

he search for the 28th president of Saint Joseph’s University has begun, and already this open search process conveys a very different atmosphere than the search that appointed current University President C. Kevin Gillespie, SJ., ’72. With university-wide email updates and widely publicized open forums, this search is intended to be a community-inclusive process. “We’re going to err on the side of giving people as much information as we can as often as we can, so that our community really understands what’s going on and where this thing is,” said Edward W. Moneypenny, ’64, chair of the Board of Trustees. “We want to make sure this whole communica-

tion thing…works really well, and we’ll try and give everything [information] now.” However, many are concerned that the 12-person presidential search committee, half of which are members of the Board of Trustees, will not have the best interests of St. Joe’s as an academic and student-centered institution in mind. The Faculty Senate expressed some reservations about the search committee at a recent senate meeting, according to Faculty Senate President Robert Moore, Ph.D. “Some faculty have expressed disappointment that A) the Faculty Senate was not consulted, and B) with the final number of faculty that are on the committee,” said Moore. The faculty is represented by two members on the search committee, one from the College of Arts and Sciences and one from

the Haub School of Business. The deans of both schools, as well as the interim provost, selected these members. Moneypenny said that he looked at approximately 10-12 other universities that have recently undergone a presidential search in order to establish the structure of the one at St. Joe’s. “It was a good idea to look at how other colleges and universities do this, but it also could have been a good idea to look back at our practice, and which historically… would involve a role for the governance structure and for the senate in particular,” Moore said. “It’s not as if the senate should have dictatorial powers, but one could argue that a consultation is not a bad idea… I think it’s very important that faculty have a voice in this.” Additionally, there is a noticeably

small number of women represented in the search committee. Catherine Murray, Ph.D., chair of the Commission on the Status of Women, said that she is concerned that the unequal ratio of men to women on the committee will deter female presidential prospects. “My concern about the composition of the search committee is that it may have a chilling effect on women candidates,” Murray said. “A woman who is interviewed by a committee which is preponderantly male may draw certain inferences about the status of women and how easy it would be for her to really work with the board.” Murray voiced her doubt that the next St. Joe’s president will be a woman. Continued PRESIDENTIAL SEARCH, Pg. 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.