The Spectator

Page 1

OPINION

FEATURES

ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT

Response to Enquiry

Love at first print

Purpose-packed poetry

Grayson Murphy ’16 comments on the harmful impact of HB2 on trans community page 5

The groom first saw the bride’s picture in an issue of The Spectator page 8

A review calls Porsha O’s performance “powerful” and “political” page 10

The Spectator Utica School and refugee center volunteering halted by Lucas Phillips ’16 Editor Emeritus

Last year, Hamilton College was sending 22 volunteers daily into Utica to volunteer in the Utica City School District and still others every week to the Mohawk Valley Resource Center for Refugees (MVRCR). No longer. Hamilton’s systematic volunteer work at Utica Public Schools and the MVRCR dates back at least 10 years. Recently, student participation in these programs has been high. Through a smattering of HAVOC (Hamilton Association for Volunteering, Outreach and Charity) and COOP (Community Outreach and Opportunity Project) programs, Hamilton was sending between 150 and 175 student volunteers to the Utica City School District in 20142015 according to Hamilton’s Assistant Vice President for Communications Mike Debraggio. Meanwhile, in 2004, the Levitt Center began running Project SHINE (Students Helping in the Naturalization of Elders) in partnership with the national organization of the same name. By fall 2012, the service-learning program was sending an average of 32 student tutors in the fall semester and 16 in the spring, teaching English language skills to refugee students in a few programs, including at the Newcomer Program, run by the MVRCR. The Levitt Center encouraged professors to incorporate the program into a new or existing classes, offering three awards of $750 in compensation for doing so, according to Project SHINE’s webpage. Yet, two lawsuits allege that the Newcomer Program was one of two programs designed to segregate refugee students from those in Utica’s Proctor High School. A year ago this month, The New York Times reported that the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) had filed a lawsuit on behalf of six refugee students it alleged were barred from access to Utica Public Schools.

This past November, after opening his own investigation, the state Attorney General, Eric T. Schneiderman, filed another suit against the school district claiming that refugee students between 17 and 21 years of age who struggled with English were refused entry into Proctor High School and funneled into programs which neither earned them credit for a diploma, nor prepared them for a high school equivalency exam. According to the suits, this violates state and federal education law. Those cases are still ongoing. Hamilton’s Project SHINE was a major resource for the Newcomer Program. The Refugee Project, a program associated with the Hamilton Digital Humanities Initiative (DHi), published a video online in April 2015 titled “Newcomers Subtitled (Spring 2014),” which features pictures of Hamilton students interacting with refugees in the program. In the video, one refugee student recalls being told that she “was not allowed to go to high school.” Dana Hubbard, the then manager of the Newcomer Program, is shown saying, “You don’t know how many times I’ve had to tell a kid that they can’t go to high school and had them crying in my office,” with the Newcomers Program being touted as an alternative for refugees in that situation. According to a description of the video on the Refugee Project page, “The Newcomers focuses on 17-to-20 year olds who fall into the gaps of the educational and social services that Utica can provide them,” but does not discuss any of the legal implications of those comments. Professor John Bartle, listed as a director of the Refugee Project and on the production team for the video, declined to be interviewed for this piece. While the lawsuits against the District only target programs back to 2007, journalist and former Hamilton professor Thomas Bass, who see MVRCR, page 2

Changes to the Counseling Center The coming year will bring an additional staff psychologist, moving the Counseling Center to a different location and full use of the new peer-counseling program. Read more on page 2.

Thursday, April 28, 2016 Volume LVI Number 24

Student-directed Blow addresses rape culture and gender roles

PHOTO BY KYANDREIA JONES ’19

Liv Lvov ’17 and Samantha Fogel ’19 in Blow, directed by Melodie Rosen ’18 and written by Raechel Jae Rosen. Read more page 11.

Anderson to be a substancefree dorm for the 2016-17 year

by Dillon Kelly ’18 News Editor

Housing has been a contentious issue since the option to live off-campus was eliminated last year. There are a few choices that students are faced with when deciding about housing such as choosing substance-free living, entering the blocking lottery for a suite, or more generally, picking on which side of campus to reside. Currently there are four substance-free residence halls for upperclassmen (Root, Kirkland, Rogers andAnderson Road), leaving 17 buildings that are not substancefree for the remaining students. “It is difficult to determine if students are signing up for the substance-free lottery because they genuinely have an interest in living a substance-free lifestyle or if they just are looking to avoid the general lottery and have housing in a specific location,” Assistant Director of Residential LifeAshley Place said. “Unfortunately, there is no way for us to determine what motivates people to sign up for specific lotteries, nor would we want to get in the business of asking. I will say that it seems like an increasing percentage of the rising sophomore class tends to sign up for the substance-free lottery, creating a tough situation when students who genuinely want it aren’t able to get it when we run out of spaces. Root, Kirkland, and more recently Rogers have been substancefree for sometime, while Anderson

is set to become substance-free next year. Place commented that the reason for this change has to do with the need for more space for the Counseling Center. She stated, “We normally have 100 College Hill Road online as substance-free but we agreed to take it offline this year to allow the Counseling Center to use the space. They are gaining a new staff member and will not have enough space in their old office. Unfortunately, their new building won’t be ready for a while so the plan is for the Counseling Center to occupy 100 College Hill Road for the next two academic years.” Place went on to explain that the school then hopes to take Anderson offline completely and return it to faculty housing as it was originally intended to be. This change to sub-free was made because both 100 College Hill Road and Anderson have 11 beds, and can maintain the number of substance-free beds the school offer for upperclassmen. Anderson was also never intended by the school to accommodate student living. The house was made into student housing a couple of years ago when the school had an unusually large number of students on campus, and space was necessary. Place states, “Now that we’re back to manageable numbers, we would ideally not have [Anderson] be student housing at all because of the condition and location.” Some students are not pleased

with the fact that dorms with apartment style living are being either taken away or are becoming more limited and harder to acquire in the housing lottery. Julia Summers ’18 represented this sentiment, stating “There is definitely a lack of housing options on campus for upperclassmen students interested in houses or apartment-style living. The school tried to address it with Morris House, but then took away more houses such as Anderson. We need more options on campus for students to have the ability to learn what it’s like to live on their own, not in a dorm building.” This year’s lottery was complicated by a gender-blocking error. “Unfortunately one of our volunteer student workers made an error in counting the male-to-female ratio in South and an announcement was made during the Junior class that South was closed to men. We go through and double check everything between lotteries and caught the error at that time,” Place said. “We corrected it immediately by opening the building up to men when the sophomore class lottery began because there was no way for us to go back and fix it for the junior class. We are sincerely sorry for the impact this error may have had for men in the rising junior class who were hoping to choose South. I will be making adjustments to the lottery next year to make sure the same mistake doesn’t happen again.”


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
The Spectator by Hamilton College Spectator - Issuu