Carbohydrates, Part I
Carbs. Carbos. Carbohydrates. Never have so many people been so confused by a food category. Good for you? Bad for you? Fattening? Slimming? On the one hand you have advocates of the Pritikin Program, and the Dean Ornish Program for reversing heart disease, suggesting that 80% of our calories should come from carbohydrates. On the other hand you have the Hellers -(Richard and Rachel) -- authors of Healthy for Life and The Carbohydrate Addict's Diet, suggesting that we cut back on carbohydrates as a means of reversing obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and even heart disease. So, who is right?
Who can forget Susan Powter's screaming infomercial promising that we can eat all the carbs we want -- and be thin -- as long as we cut out fat. But what about Barry Sears and The Zone. He advocates that we restrict our carbohydrate intake to only 40% of our calories, aiming for a 40-30-30 balance of nutrients. Who is right?
To further confuse the issue, there's disagreement about the subcategories of carbohydrates. Complex carbs are good, say some of the so-called experts, and sugars are bad. Some people go so far as to maintain the sugar is toxic, and responsible for everything from addiction, to cancer, to criminal behavior. Who is right? Let's wade through the hype and hoopla, and take a closer look.
We may well discover -- as is often the case with nutrition issues -- that nobody is totally right, and everybody is a little bit right. First, there is no perfect universal eating plan. To quote the cliche: "One man's meat is another man's poison." And, the needs of the individual are not static. Our needs change with the seasons, with our age, and with our health status at the moment.
First, the chemistry lesson....
Carbohydrates are those substances composed of molecules of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen (CHO.) Hence the name: Carbo (as in carbon) and
1
Copyright Š 1999-2006 Jackie Storm PhD, CNS