The Myth Of Sisyphus

With everything going on with the upcoming presidential election, the political community has been very prominent in society the past several months. While doing research on myths, I came across The Myth of Sisyphus and immediately made many connections between the two subjects. Both of these topics have a lot to do with manipulation and deception. With politics especially, people today have a lot of opinions on the dynamics of that community. They both deal with continuous repetition and constantly giving your all to make accomplish a task. What is interesting though is exactly to what extent can The Myth of Sisyphus be related to our modern day political community? The main gist of The Myth of Sisyphus is that a sinner named Tartarus was

Get more content

PHILOSOPHY IN HIS WORKS:

At the point when France was involved amid WWII, ended up noticeably dynamic in the resistance development and acted as the supervisor in–boss in the daily paper named 'battle'. Taking a shot at his three books to be specific the outsider, the torment, and the fall alongside his short stories the myth of Sisyphus and the revolt in the mid–century got him global readership and notoriety. It was in these works that he presented and built up the twin philosophical thoughts–the idea of the silly and the idea of revolt–that made him well known. His assemblage of work additionally incorporates a gathering of short fiction, banish and the kingdom; a self–portraying novel, the primary man; various emotional works, most quite Caligula, the misconception, the condition of attack, and the equitable professional killers; a few interpretations and adjustments, including new forms of works by Calderon, lope de Vega, Dostoyevsky, and Faulkner; and a protracted arrangement of expositions,...show more content...

In his book–length essay, The Myth of Sisyphus, Camus presents a philosophy that contests philosophy itself. This essay belongs squarely in the philosophical tradition of existentialism but Camus denied being an existentialist. Both The Myth of Sisyphus and his other philosophical work, The Rebel, are systematically skeptical of conclusions about the meaning of life, yet both works assert objectively valid answers to key questions about how to live. Though Camus seemed modest when describing his intellectual ambitions, he was confident enough as a philosopher to articulate not only his own philosophy but also a critique of religion and a fundamental critique of modernity. While rejecting the very idea of a philosophical system, Camus constructed his own original edifice of ideas around the key terms of absurdity and rebellion, aiming to resolve the life–or–death issues that motivated

The Myth of Sisyphus Sisyphus is the absurd hero. This man, sentenced to ceaselessly rolling a rock to the top of a mountain and then watching it roll back down, is the epitome of the absurd hero according to Camus. In retelling the Myth of Sisyphus, Camus is able to create an extremely powerful image which sums up the intellectual discussion which comes before it in the book. We are told that Sisyphus is the absurd hero "as much through his passions as through his torture. His scorn of the gods, his hatred of death, and his passion for life won him that unspeakable penalty in which the whole being is exerted toward accomplishing nothing." (p.89). Sisyphus is conscious of his troubles , and...show more content...

In these essays Camus looks the problem of suicide. In a shocking, unnerving manner he opens with the bold statement that: There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide. (p. 3). He goes on to discover if suicide is a real answer to the human who is unhappy with life. Or if life is worth living now that god is dead? The discussion begins and continues not as a metaphysical cobweb but as a well reasoned statement based on a way of knowing which Camus holds is the only epistemology we have at our command. We know only two things: This heart within me I can feel, and I judge that it exists. This world I can touch, and I likewise judge that it exists. There ends all my knowledge, and the rest is construction. (p. 14) With these as the basic certainties of the human condition, Camus argues that there is no meaning to life. He disapproves of the many philosophers who "have played on words and pretended to believe that refusing to grant a meaning to life necessarily leads to declaring that it is not worth living." (p.7) Life has no absolute meaning. In spite of the human's irrational "nostalgia" for unity, for absolutes, for a definite order and meaning to the "not me" of the universe, no such meaning exists in the silent, indifferent universe. Between this yearning for meaning and eternal verities and the actual condition

Get more content

Man's search for meaning and The Myth of Sisyphus both have similar storylines. Man's Search for meaning written by Victor Frankl takes place during WWII in an Auschwitz concentration camp. Where Frankl talks about finding purpose in his life, and finding some positivity to live on. Myth of Sisyphus is written by Albert Camus talks about a man's search for meaning using the myth of Sisyphus. Sisyphus was a man punished by the greek gods, and sent down to hell to push a boulder up a hill everyday. The Boulder would always roll down so no matter what it was meaningless, and he was subjected to do this everyday of his eternal life. Sisyphus and Frankl are both stuck in a kind of Hell. Although Sisyphus's Hell seems like more of a chore than Frankl Hell where people are getting sick, and dying everyday. In this point in their lives they have no purpose, but both search for that purpose. Frankl searches for a reason to keep on living and find a positive view on life. While

Sisyphus was doomed to push the rock up the hill over and over, and hopes to find purpose through that....show more content... Camus states "His rock is his thing. Likewise, the absurd man, when he contemplates his torment, silences all the idols... The absurd man says yes and his effort will henceforth be unceasing" (Camus). Meaning Sisyphus is a ridiculous man to look at the rock everyday and think i'm gonna push this rock up this hill even though I will never accomplish anything. No matter what he does he will not: complete, accomplish, or make a change by pushing that rock up the hill, so Camus just calls him an "absurd man". On the other hand Frankl is not absurd for dying to find meaning in his live. He lives in a dark place with horrid conditions. All he wants to find is a reason to live, and carry on with his live even though it's definitely not the ideal life. Frankl has to live with it so might as well find

Get more content

Albert Camus' The Myth of Sisyphus Albert Camus' essay, 'The Myth Of Sisyphus' is an insightful analysis of the classic work, 'The Myth Of Sisyphus'. In some regards Camus' view of Sisyphus can seem quite accurate and in tune with the original text, but based on Camus' interpretation of the justness of Sisyphus' punishment, it is clear that the writer has some different ideas as well. Camus concludes that this punishment does not have the effect the Gods had intended, and ultimately the tragic hero must be seen as being 'happy'. This is his greatest departure from the intent of the original myth wherein the reader is left with the feeling that Sisyphus' punishment can be seen as appropriate and just. As his punishment for ...show more content...

As the extent of Sisyphus? punishment is only described in the original story by a single sentence, Camus takes great pains in describing the psychological effects it has on Sisyphus, and the mental state he must be in to endure such an ordeal. In describing this, Camus focuses on the point at which Sisyphus makes his decent back to gather his great rock. It is at this point that Camus makes clear as to why he considers Sisyphus an ?absurd hero?. Assuming that this punishment can only be considered tragic if Sisyphus becomes conscious of it, Camus points out that it is during this descent that our main character becomes aware of his awful state, and in doing so becomes, ?superior to his fate. He is stronger than his rock.? Camus suggests that Sisyphus is at ease with this punishment because in this ?absurd? universe, man?s fate is the only thing that can be shaped by man, and in doing so, that fate belongs to man. Sisyphus? rock belongs to him. If it is possible to see Sisyphus as conscious during his descent, then it is surely possible that he is aware of his predicament during his grueling ascent as well. Is Sisyphus not ?conscious? of the horrible punishment that he has been handed by the Gods as he makes his way up the hill with his rock? It is his ascent that allows the reader of the original story to remember what this act is supposed to represent, and it is the ascent that Camus, although he describes it

Get more content