Hemant joshi portfolio 2018 by HEMANT JOSHI

contents { } FACADE DEATILS

6-11

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS

14-19

THE INDIAN IDENTITY CRISIS (RESEARCH PAPER)

22-23

PARIKRAMA

26-27

A STORY OF THE SEASONS

30-33

MISCELLANEOUS

34-35

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

london towers { }

PROJECT LOCATION SPECIFICATION STATUS

- Internship project - Bangalore (Karnataka) - G+4 800sq.m Commercial complex. - Under construction 4 I HEMANT JOSHI

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

FERROCEMENT FACADE-DETAIL

FACADE BEAM STRUCTURAL DETAILS STRUCTURAL 3D MODELLING THROUGH CONSULTANT COORDINATION

MY ROLE { } My role in the project was to produce working drawings for the facade details, which included facade brickwork, slant beam details, ferro-cement marking, and other structural drawings to be sent on site. This required constant coordination with the structural consultant and also site inspection for correct execution of work. Moreover, to be more in control of the situation structural digital models were made that were built and maintained as per the structural drawings sent in by the consultants at the office.

5 I HEMANT JOSHI

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

NOS.

Headroom FFL +20200mm

Headroom Lintel +18400mm

REVISION DETAILS LT-A10.0-ELEVATION DETAILS

300

Dwg TITLE: 3050

First Floor FFL +5050mm

Architectural Design:

400

100

First Floor FFL +5050mm

300

600

300

FF-01 FFL +5050

300

SHOWROOM SPACE First Floor FFL +5050mm

Second Floor FFL +8700mm

300

FERRO CEMENT TO DETAIL

300 0

150

300

Second Floor FFL +8700mm

3050

3750 [12'-4"]

3650 [12'-0"]

3550 [11'-8"]

2350 [7'-9"]

350 1350

300

SF-03 FFL +8700

Second Floor FFL +8700mm

1850 [6'-1"]

200

AS PER SITE

SHOWROOM SPACE

Arch Elevation Details

3000 [9'-10"]

Dwg NO: Drawn by HEMANT

3550 [11'-8"]

2750

300

AS PER STRUCTURAL DETAIL

2750

AS PER STRUCTURAL DETAIL

Third Floor FFL +12050mm

Checked by VIKRAM

Third Floor FFL +12050mm

150

SHOWROOM SPACE 300

GF-01 FFL +1250

Ground Floor FFL +1250mm

CLIENT:

PARKING BF-01 FFL -1800

1100

600

SF-01 W-14

varies

400

200

SF-01 W-12

SF-01 W-11

SF-01 W-10

varies

SF-01 W-13

LEGEND

SF-01 W-09

2042

3000

Inclined Beam As Per Site Inclined Beam As Per Structural Detail Beam As Per Site

Third Floor FFL +12050mm

AS PER STRUCTURAL DETAIL

HVAC

300 SHOWROOM SPACE SF-03 FFL +8700

Second Floor FFL +8700mm

400

TF-01 W-10

SECTION D

B' A'

ROAD

±0 LVL

DATE

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

GENERAL NOTES: * THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RELEVANT SPECIFICATION & CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT. * ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ONLY TO BE READ & NOT MEASURED OR SCALED, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE VERIFIED ON SITE BY CONTRACTOR & ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO PMC & ARCHITECT NOTICE IMMEDIATELY. * ALL LEVELS INDICATED IN THIS DRAWING ARE FINISHED LEVELS UNLESS EXPRESSLY SPECIFIED. * THIS DRAWING UNLESS STAMPED & SIGNED GOOD FOR CONSTRUCTION BY AGENCIES CONCERNED SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY SITE WORKS.

5675

2750

varies varies as per slope

150

300

900 varies

TF-01 W-11

300

FERRO CEMENT TO DETAIL

±0 LVL

1150

3800

varies as per slope

TF-02 FFL +12050

Slab

ROAD TF-01 W-12

1200

800

BEAM AS PER SITE

150

2650

2900 150

650

SHOWROOM SPACE

Beam As Per Site 800

AS PER STRUCTURAL DETAIL

2650

TF-01 W-09

FERRO CEMENT TO DETAIL

TF-01 W-13

150

1400

150

B 2550

300

150

MEP

RCC (Structural Members)

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 2750

250

Block work

±0 LVL

950

Ferro-Cement

ROAD

LONDON TOWER @ BANGALORE

700

SECTION B

150

700

BEAM AS PER SITE

800

700

800

1650

150

1200

150

3550

varies as per slope

150

varies

A 150

varies

150

2892

AS PER STRUCTURAL DETAIL

SECTION A

AS PER STRUCTURAL DETAIL

400

FERRO CEMENT TO DETAIL

LANDSCAPE

FERRO CEMENT MARKING SCALE 1:100

STRUCURE

EAST ELEVATION

Site NGL ± 0mm

2450

Site NGL ± 0mm

2450

Site NGL ± 0mm

300

62 R

Ground Floor FFL +1250mm

300

1150

300

3200

400

Issued by DIVYA

TF-02 FFL +12050

200

No.45 KK complex, Shankar mutt road, Shankar puram,Bangalore-560004.

SHOWROOM SPACE

C A D E N C E

300

FERRO CEMENT TO DETAIL

2750

350

Terrace FFL +15400mm

300

200

AS PER SITE

2750

300

Terrace FFL +15400mm

300

AS PER STRUCTURAL DETAIL

Third Floor FFL +12050mm

300

TerF-02 FFL +15400

3800 [12'-6"]

Parapet Lvl +16400mm

TERRACE

Terrace FFL +15400mm

300

150

Parapet Lvl +16400mm

300

30 0

300

HATCH INDICATES FERRO CEMENT TO DETAIL

NOS.

Headroom FFL +20200mm

LEGEND

Headroom Lintel +18400mm

Ferro-Cement Block work 30

300

RCC (Structural Members)

Parapet Lvl +16400mm

Inclined Beam As Per Site Terrace FFL +15400mm

Inclined Beam As Per Structural Detail Beam As Per Site Beam As Per Site REVISION DETAILS

Slab

Arch Elevation Details

Second Floor FFL +8700mm

400

100 400

Architectural Design:

300

1150

0 62

Ground Floor FFL +1250mm

300

No.45 KK complex, Shankar mutt road, Shankar puram,Bangalore-560004.

First Floor FFL +5050mm

600

C A D E N C E

Dwg NO: Drawn by HEMANT

Dwg TITLE:

AS PER STRUCTURAL DETAIL

Issued by DIVYA

HATCH INDICATES FERRO CEMENT TO DETAIL

LT-A10.1-ELEVATION DETAILS

Checked by VIKRAM

Third Floor FFL +12050mm

CLIENT:

Site NGL ± 0mm

EAST ELEVATION

2000

GF-01 W-09

FERRO CEMENT TO DETAIL

1500 400

1450

B' 1580

3235

REM/15610

1920

D R1

MEP

2450

475

3750

1800

FF-01 W-14

varies as per slope

FF-01 W-10

FF-01 W-12

150

FF-01 W-11

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

16050

ROAD

±0 LVL

ROAD

±0 LVL

TERRACE FLOOR PLAN A'

6 I HEMANT JOSHI

FF-01 W-09

B FERRO CEMENT TO DETAIL

1750

100

500

FF-01 W-13

100mm thk Parapet wall

1250

varies

800

2000

TerF-01A FFL +15400

350

775

TERRACE FLOOR 15

550

500

400

3650

150

700

150

2350

150

700

150

1850

150

2892 150

1085

250

150

AS PER STRUCTURAL DETAIL 4565

FERRO CEMENT TO DETAIL

D FF-01 W-19

HVAC

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

100

±0 LVL

500

ROAD

200

500

150

550

100

3300

150

1450

1350

150

4350

200

LONDON TOWER @ BANGALORE

12000

250 150

650

150 1850

LANDSCAPE

3000

STRUCURE

150

9000

1600

3050

1850

1700

2200

150

3650

150

650

400 1600

150

FERRO CEMENT MARKING SCALE 1:100

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

7 I HEMANT JOSHI

natesh residence { }

- Internship project - Chennai (Tamilnadu) - G+2 280sq.m Residence. - Under construction

8 I HEMANT JOSHI

PROJECT LOCATION SPECIFICATION STATUS

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

DRAWINGS FOR MARKING AND REPRESENTING THE COMPLEX CONFIGURATION AS THE BEAM AS PER DIMENSIONS

ANGULAR BEAM MARKING DRAWINGS

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

STRUCTURAL 3D MODELLING THROUGH CONSULTANT COORDINATION

MY ROLE { } My role in the project was to produce shuttering drawings working drawings for the structural details, which included shuttering plans, sections, rcc wall details, and detailed beam marking, and other structural drawings to be sent on site. Natesh residence had a very angular design and the structure is of a deconstructive style. Thus to attain control over the construction process constant coordination with the structural consultant and also site inspection for correct execution of work.

9 I HEMANT JOSHI

ARETE Consultants

CLIENT:

Suyogg consultants

Specs Consultants

STRUCURE

+918022420007. Mr. Natesh phone no : +918041508214, C A D E N

3-Fold Consultants

C E

Scale

Dwg NO: Dateby Drawn

Issued by

Checked by

NR_ G-A07.1a Roof Shuttering DWG

NOS.

REVISION DETAILS

Issued by Checked by Roof Shuttering Sections Dwg TITLE: NR_G-GFVIKRAM DIVYA

NR_ G-A07.1b Roof Shuttering DWG

Dwg TITLE: NR_G-GF Roof Shuttering Details

Dwg NO: E Drawn by HEMANT

CLIENT:

No.45 KK complex, Shankar mutt road, Architectural Design: Shankar puram,Bangalore-560004.

C A D E N C

Architectural Design:

LANDSCAPE

Mr. Natesh 3-Fold Consultants Specs Consultants NATESH RESIDENCE, GAURIBIDANUR

ARETE Consultants Suyogg consultants PROJECT TITLE : Bays consultants MEP HVAC

TRUCTION BY AGENCIES & NOT MEASURED OR SCALED, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE R & ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO PMC UE VERIFICATION & ACCEPTANCE TO NOTICE IMMEDIATELY.

10 I HEMANT JOSHI

LS UNLESS EXPRESSLY NCTION WITH THE RELEVANT SPECIFICATION &

LANDSCAPE

NOS.

DATE

ARETE Consultants

PROJECT TITLE : HVAC

Specs Consultants

STRUCURE

3-Fold Consultants

LANDSCAPE

NATESH RESIDENCE, GAURIBIDANUR Suyogg consultants Bays consultants

MEP

Mr. Natesh

CLIENT:

STRUCURE

NATESH RESIDENCE, GAURIBIDANUR

MEP

 D1, D2, and D3 are dowels that need to be provided.  COL starts from the plinth and end at the top of ground floor roof.

PROJECT TITLE : HVAC

Scale

Date

Issued by DIVYA

Checked by VIKRAM

NR_ G-A07.1Roof Shuttering DWG

Dwg TITLE: NR_G-GF Roof Shuttering Drawing Dwg NO: E Drawn by HEMANT phone no : +918041508214, +918022420007.

No.45 KK complex, Shankar mutt road, Shankar puram,Bangalore-560004.

C A D E N C

Architectural Design:

B23a

R SCALED, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO PMC

NOTE:

LEVANT SPECIFICATION &

REVISION DETAILS

NOS.

DATE

COL PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

{

critical regionalism and

identity

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

}

PROJECT -Research paper ( pre-thesis/dissertation )(4th year project) SPECIFICATION -A study on “Indian Identity” from the standpoint of architecture STATUS -Under review 11 I HEMANT JOSHI

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

EPIGRAPH { }

All the great architects that ever existed had one thing in common: They knew what they wanted to do in architecture and also life in general. They knew what and how they wanted to create built environments and how it can affect the world around it. They had a clear direction and a clear picture of what they wanted to do. Hence, one can say that identity guides ones’ actions.

1 “Phenomenology in architecture can be understood as an aspect of philosophy researching into the experience of built space, and as shorthand for architectural phenomenology, a historical architectural movement.”- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(architecture)

12 I HEMANT JOSHI

Taking the case of contemporary Indian architecture from a phenomenological1 l standpoint and exploring the contingent idea of ïndian-ness”that has always been the part of the political discourse of architecture. Thus, the following text intends to answer a seemingly naïve question – “what is the Indian way of doing things?”, this in turn brings up the question- “in this globalised world why should one adhere to this Indian-identity?”.

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

^ *

{

AS SENSE OF HISTORY

}

THE CASE OF COLLECTIVE IDENTITY OF INDIA

India is the most diverse and the most divided nation in the world which has managed to keep it together with the complex social system. Is there a common idea of identity that connects its billion plus citizens? If yes, then how does it manifest itself in the field of design that has existed for a long time. Is there an idea of â&#x20AC;&#x153;INDIAN-NESSâ&#x20AC;? that gets reflected in our ways of functioning and thinking? Or in other words -Is there an Indian way of doing things?

13 I HEMANT JOSHI

*Image courtesy : Mr. Kunal Singh Tomar(jodhpur); Personal collection. ^Rare book society of India, Architecture of India, paintings http://www.rarebooksocietyofindia.org/grid-layout. php?t=23&page=9&sort=Rare%20Photographs

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

{

THE TRANSITION

}

*Image courtesy : Mr. Kunal Singh Tomar(jodhpur); Personal collection.

{

}

NEWNESS / STRUGGLE

The people had lost a sense of “CULTURAL CONSCIOUSNESS”. LATER, India stepped into the globalised grounds and had to compete, and somehow with this struggle and in attempt to become more “GLOBALLY RELEVANT” we had to compensate our heritage.

14 I HEMANT JOSHI

India as a collective idea is of a recent origin. It was actually the british who both united and divided India. So India going through Islamic invasion and then later the British rule left her disoriented, and we were handed a situation of political, economic, and identity -crisis. Till this day we struggle and it seems like the British never left India. So, as time passed Indian started adapt and the citizens too assumed westen identities. Thus, suddenly the world’s largest democracywanted to imitate. Today,what we have is called “THE ARCHITECTURE OF IMPATIENT CAPITAL”

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

15 I HEMANT JOSHI

PARIKRAMA { }

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

RURAL TRAINING CENTER

GET LOST TO FIND YOURSELF...

“LOOSING ONE’S SENSE OF LIFE IS A GOOD WAY TO LEARN...... A CAMPUS MUST BE A PLACE TO GET LOST.....A PLACE OF ONCE “NOT-KNOWING” AND THEN “KOWING......”

16 I HEMANT JOSHI

PROJECT - 3rd year Design project SPECIFICATION - A rural training center location in jodhpur(rajasthan) STATUS - Complete

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

PARIKRAMA/ PROMENADE: promenade apparently introduced by ar. Le Corbusier means movement in, around or through the space in a complex circulation system. while, parikrama means going around something -circumambulation- it involves moving around something sacred in concentric or irregular paths to experience a contemplative state of mind. I believe that parikrama was a long back interpretation of the promenade in a religious context, through this design I intended to have an abstraction of the same in a metaphorical sense and use it in the planning of the academic block.there are ways to enter the same space through different paths.

17 I HEMANT JOSHI

CAMPUS LAYOUT

AREA OF MAXIMUM FOOTFALL

ACCOMMODATION BLOCK

TEACHER AND STAFF CIRCULATION STUDENT CIRCULATION

ACADEMIC BLOCK ADMIN BLOCK

INSPIRATION

INTENTIONS

THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE

LEARNINGS

ACTIVE SPACE OF EDUCATION

CHABUTRA

INTERACTION

THE INDIAN PLAN IS NOT CENTRICâ&#x20AC;¦ bv doshi

45M

LVL+1.2M

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

LVL+1.5M

LVL+2M

LVL+2.3M

LVL+0.45M

LVL-+0M

LVL+1.2M

LVL+1. 5M

LVL+1.5M

LVL+2.3M LVL+1.5M LVL+1.5M LVL-+0M

LVL-1.8M LVL+0.45M

LVL+0.45M

LVL-+0M

LVL+1.5M

LVL-1.8M

LVL-1.8M LVL+1.5M

LVL+1.5M

LVL-1.8M

LVL+1.5M

LVL+0.45M LVL+1.5M

LVL+0.45M

LVL-1.8M

ENTRY

DOWN

LVL+0.45M

LVL-1.8M

LVL+1.5M

LVL-1.8M

LVL+0.45M

LVL-1.8M

LVL+0.45M LVL-+0M

LVL+0.45M

LVL+0.45M LVL-1.8M LVL+0.45M LVL-+0M

THE PERSONAL INTENT WITH THE DESIGN : ALTHOUGH THE The primary objective of this assignment was to understand a typical rural training center and the interrelationship between various functions of the unit. BUT THE MAIN CHALLENGE WAS TO MAKE IT A COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE RURAL PUPILS, IT IS OBSERVED THAT THE RURAL PEOPLE BESIDEs lacking basic employability skills TEND TO HAVE MORE ANXIETY AND MOST LACK SELF CONFIDENCE. hence, the major focus of the design was to make the students feel comfortable-at home-at ease. This was achieved by the shape and the style of the building, it should be such that it develops an interactive environment for the rural youth. The way to not be anxious about the urban world is to not be afraid of it rather be familiar with it. the rural youth, who are mostly totally unaware of the world around and lead bleak lives without hope for an improvement in the ways of there lifestyle., could be changed by making them change their minds, and their ways of thinking. this could be done by exposing them to new things, new environments to foster there newly discovered talents and to impart them not just the skills but the right attitude to led life. 19 I HEMANT JOSHI

Exposure comes from interaction with different people, and the design leveraged the same notion by installing maximum interaction places in the campus and surrounding them with open workshop areas that consequently produce active spaces and environments of educational activities.

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

RESIDENCE { } AN ARCHITECT’S RESIDENCE IN SHIMLA

A STORY OF THE SEASONS...

AN ARCHITECT’S RESEDENCE IN SHIMLA (HIMACHAL PRDESH). IN THE SERENE VALLIES OF HIMALIYAS. THE ARCHITECT HAPPENS TO HAVE A PASSION FOR DANCE AND THE SITE IS CONTOURS DOWN TO A LAKE.

20 I HEMANT JOSHI

PROJECT - 2nd year Design project SPECIFICATION - A residence for an architect in Shimla (Himachal Pradesh) STATUS - Complete

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

SITE ANALYSIS The given site lies in a relatively isolated area, this seclusion from the urban fabric provides a serene valley environment of Shimla and this aspect of the site is leveraged in the design. IMPORTANT FACT: The lake to which the site contours down, is connected to a larger lake which is on a lower level. Hence, the water in the lake never rises above one metre. Therefore, the lower floors are placed close to the water.

PROJECT BRIEF: Design of an Architectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s residence on a site beside a lake, the intent of the exercise was to work with an unfamiliar context and to efficiently utilize the given site. Furthermore, the Architect happens to have a passion for dance, hence a dance studio is incorporated in the design. THE SITE: The site is located in the valleys of Shimla beside a lake. The site is 465 sqm. The site as surveyed has four basic levels, starting from the lake itself at 0.0m and goes up to +4.7m which is the level of the connecting road.

A B C

THE EVOLUTION OF VOLUMES : The following diagrams describe the evolution of the design. Starting from 1 the basic sketch of the plan-form to the final form as per given requirements.

FRAMING VISTAS: The given site had four main vistas that were interesting in their own ways. The conception of the planform involves planning along axes that framed these four vistas.

21 I HEMANT JOSHI

INSPIRATION FROM PAINTINGS: Sketch of form that is not humancentric. It involves making art with only geometric entities and the compositions hold a meaning. The plan-form of the design is an abstraction of some of the most famous suprematist paintings.

LVL+4.3

LVL+1M

MISC.-LEVELS

A). LIBRARY.

A').ENTRANCE PORCH.

B). DINING AREA.

B').FOYER LEVEL.

C).POWDER ROOM (5M X 5M).

C').DRAWING ROOM (5M X 5M).

1'). ROAD LEVEL AT OFFICE ENTRANCE (LVL+0.6M).

D). STORE ROOM.

D'). GALLERY IN OFFICE.

E'). STUDIO (90 SQ.M.).

2).ACTIVITY AREA.

3').CAR PARK LEVEL (LVL+0.8M).

3).BOAT HOARDING(LVL+-0M).

4'). GARAGE LEVEL (LVL+ 0.6M) (6M X 6M).

F). SITTING/ WAITING OUTSIDE OFFICE.

F). OPEN KITCHEN.

1).LOWER FLOOR (LVL-3.7M).

2'). ROAD LEVEL AT HOUSE ENTRANCE (LVL+0.6M).

E). LIVING ROOM WITH FIREL-PLACE.

G). POOL SIDE SITTING.

G). CONFERENCE ROOM (3M X 4.5M).

H). BEDROOM FOR PARENTS

H'). ARCHITECT'S OFFICE (6M X 5.8M).

I, J). DRESSING AND BATHROOM

I', J'). ARCHITECT'S OFFICE TOILET.

4). LOWER LEVEL EXIT.

5'). WAITING AREA AND RECEPTION (LVL+0.9M) (4M X 7M).

5, 8). GUEST BEDROOOM(7M X 5M) WITH DECK.

6'). OFFICE RECEPTION STORE (LVL+0.9M) (1.5M X 4M).

6, 7). DRESSING AND BATHROOM(3M X 3M).

9,12). KIDS BEDROOM(7MX 5M) WITH DECK.

CAS 1 (LVL+0.5 M): CAS2 (LVL+ 0.2M): CAS 3 (LVL+0.1 M) (THESE ARE THE 3 DESCENDING LEVELS OF POOL COMPONENETS THAT CASCADE DOWN INTO THE MAIN LEVEL OF THE POOL

K). DECK AREA COVERED WITH WEDGED PURGOLA

10, 11). DRESSING AND BATHROOM(3M X 3M).

13, 14, 16, 17). PIER THAT EXTENDED DOWN ONTO THE LAKE.

POOL LEVEL 1 (LVL-1.4M)(SHALLOW SIDE OF THE POOL).

L). DANCE STUDIO

15). FAMILY SPRING LOUNGE.

POOL LEVEL 2(LVL-1.9M)(DEEPER SIDE OF THE POOL).

M). HOME THEATRE. N). LOWER LEVEL DECK AREA

18). STEP DOWN PLATFORMS INTO THE LAKE.

INDOOR POOL (LVL-+0M).

O). SITTING AREA

7'). PERSONAL DECK AREA FOR ARCHITECT. (LVL-1.9M).

P). PANTRY.

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

LVL-3.7M

8'). INDOOR POOL AREA (LVL- 2.8M).

Q, R). LADIES TOILET, POWDER ROOM

9, 10, 11). MASTER BEDROOM,(10M X 12M) DRESSING ROOM, AND BATHROOM (3MX4M) (LVL-2.8M).

S). GENTS TOILET.

12). POOL REGULATOR (LVL-1.9M). 13'). STEP DOWN DECK AREA CLOSEE TO THE LAKE(LVL--1.8M).

LVL+4.3

LVL+1M

A). LIBRARY.

A').ENTRANCE PORCH.

B). DINING AREA.

B').FOYER LEVEL.

C).POWDER ROOM (5M X 5M).

C').DRAWING ROOM (5M X 5M).

D). STORE ROOM.

D'). GALLERY IN OFFICE.

MISC.-LEVELS

G). POOL SIDE SITTING.

G). CONFERENCE ROOM (3M X 4.5M). H'). ARCHITECT'S OFFICE (6M X 5.8M).

I, J). DRESSING AND BATHROOM

I', J'). ARCHITECT'S OFFICE TOILET.

O eR Wid 4.7 M +

4). LOWER LEVEL

5'). WAITING AREA AND RECEPTION (LVL+0.9M) (4M X 7M).

5, 8). GUEST BEDROOOM(7M X WITH DECK.

6'). OFFICE RECEPTION STORE (LVL+0.9M) (1.5M X 4M).

6, 7). DRESSING A BATHROOM(3M X

CAS 1 (LVL+0.5 M): CAS2 (LVL+ 0.2M): CAS 3 (LVL+0.1 M) (THESE ARE THE 3 DESCENDING LEVELS OF POOL COMPONENETS THAT CASCADE DOWN INTO THE MAIN LEVEL OF THE POOL

POOL LEVEL 1 (LVL-1.4M)(SHALLOW SIDE OF THE POOL).

L). DANCE STUDIO

N). LOWER LEVEL DECK AREA O). SITTING AREA

13, 14, 16, 17). PIE EXTENDED DOWN THE LAKE.

18). STEP DOWN PLATFORMS INTO LAKE.

INDOOR POOL (LVL-+0M). 7'). PERSONAL DECK AREA FOR ARCHITECT. (LVL-1.9M).

P). PANTRY.

9,12). KIDS BEDRO 5M) WITH DECK.

10, 11). DRESSING BATHROOM(3M X

15). FAMILY SPRIN LOUNGE.

POOL LEVEL 2(LVL-1.9M)(DEEPER SIDE OF THE POOL).

M). HOME THEATRE.

Lvl

3).BOAT HOARDING(LVL+-

4'). GARAGE LEVEL (LVL+ 0.6M) (6M X 6M).

K). DECK AREA COVERED WITH WEDGED PURGOLA

2).ACTIVITY AREA

3').CAR PARK LEVEL (LVL+0.8M).

F). SITTING/ WAITING OUTSIDE OFFICE.

H). BEDROOM FOR PARENTS

1).LOWER FLOOR (LVL-3.7M).

2'). ROAD LEVEL AT HOUSE ENTRANCE (LVL+0.6M).

E'). STUDIO (90 SQ.M.).

E). LIVING ROOM WITH FIREL-PLACE. F). OPEN KITCHEN.

LVL-3.7M

1'). ROAD LEVEL AT OFFICE ENTRANCE (LVL+0.6M).

8'). INDOOR POOL AREA (LVL- 2.8M).

Q, R). LADIES TOILET, POWDER ROOM

9, 10, 11). MASTER BEDROOM,(10M X 12M) DRESSING ROOM, AND BATHROOM (3MX4M) (LVL-2.8M).

S). GENTS TOILET.

12). POOL REGULATOR (LVL-1.9M). 13'). STEP DOWN DECK AREA CLOSEE TO THE LAKE(LVL--1.8M).

4.7

N S

STO

3.3

A' G'

B' WN DO

13'

LVL

+5.7

I' H'

wo ode n con deck ne roo cting ms

woo cove red de conn n deck ectin g

8 1.

13'

L G

Â± vl

12' 14

12'

OO RP OO

11'

IND

OO L

IND

8' 7

5 DO

8 DO

11 12

22 I HEMANT JOSHI

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

ROOF LEVEL

(LVL+4.7M)

CEILING LEVEL LOWER ROOF LOWER CEILING LEVEL SITE LEVEL ROAD LEVEL POOL DEPTH 1 POOL DEPTH 2

(LVL+4.3M) (Lvl+3.2M). (LVL+2.6M). (LVL+0.6M) (LVL-+ 0M) (LVL -1.4M) (LVL -1.9M)

LOWER FLOOR (LVL-3.7M) LAKE LEVEL (LVL-4.7M)

FRONT

ELEVATION

ROOF LEVEL

(LVL+4.7M)

PORTICO SITE LEVEL

(LVL+0.6M)

(LVL+ 1M)

SITTING AREA (LVL-0.3M)

BACK

ELEVATION

LAKE LEVEL

(LVL-4.7M)

ROOF LEVEL

(LVL+4.7M)

UPPER FLOOR (LVL+1M) SITE LEVEL (LVL+0.6M) POOL DEPTH 2 (LVL -1.9M)

FAMILY LOUNGE (LVL-3.7M) LAKE LEVEL (LVL-4.7M)

LEFT SIDE

ELEVATION

ROOF LEVEL

(LVL+4.7M)

OFFICE PLINTH (LVL+1M). STEP-DOWN (LVL-0.4M) OFFICE DECK PERSONAL (LVL-1.9M) DECK FAMILY LOUNGE (LVL-3.7M) LAKE LEVEL (LVL-4.7M)

RIGHT SIDE

ELEVATION

23 I HEMANT JOSHI

SEASONAL USE OF SPACES

ALL DRAWINGS IN SCALE: 1: 400

INSPRATION

CONJECTURE

BUILT ENVIRONMENT CAN BE AN ARTFULL DECEIT…

DESIGN INTENTIONS

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

THE VIEW FROM THE DRIVEWAY : THE VIEW FROM THE DRIVEWAY AS ONE ENTRS THE SITE THIS VIEW IS FRAMES THE LONGEST VISTA OF THE PANORMA AROUND THE SITE. AS ONE EXECUTES A TURN ON THE DRIVEWAY AND MOVES INTO THE SITE HE COULD SEE BEYOND THE BUILT FORM AND THIS WAS THE ONE OF THE MAIN INTENTIONS OF THE DESIGN.

ROOF LEVEL

(LVL+4.7M)

CEILING LEVEL (LVL+4.3M) PLINTH LEVEL SITE LEVEL ROAD LEVEL DECK

(LVL+1M). (LVL+0.6M) (LVL-+ 0M) (LVL-0.4M)

PRIVATE DECK (LVL -2.9M) LAKE LEVEL

(LVL-4.7M)

SECION AT AA’

ROOF LEVEL

(LVL+4.7M)

CEILING LEVEL LOWER ROOF

(LVL+4.3M) (LVL+3.2M).

LOWER CEILING (LVL+2.6M). SITE LEVEL (LVL+0.6M) DECK (LVL-0.4M) PERSONAL DECK (LVL-1.9M) LOWER FLOOR LAKE LEVEL

(LVL-3.7M) (LVL-4.7M)

SECTION AT BB’ 24 I HEMANT JOSHI

PORTFOLIO 2017-18 ar.hemantjoshi@gmail.com

GRAPHY

PHOTO-

25 I HEMANT JOSHI