Half hollow hills 2012 performance report

HALF HOLLOW HILLS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT of Huntington and Babylon

2011 – 12 Performance Report June 10, 2013

1

District Profile 2011 - 2012 • Enrollment: 9656 • Free - Reduced Lunch: 11% • Limited English Proficient: 2% • Special Education: 15% • Race/Ethnic Origin § Black or African American: 12% § Hispanic or Latino: 7% § Asian / Pacific Islander: 12% § White: 66% § Multiracial: 2%

• Annual Attendance Rate: 96% Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

2 2

District Assessment Statistics • Total number of New York State Assessments § § § § §

• 18,195

3-8 ELA: 4,588 3-8 Math: 4,598 4 & 8 Science: 1,134 NYSESLAT: 166 Regents Exams: 7,699

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

3 3

District Accountability • English-Language Arts: Good Standing • Mathematics: Good Standing Highest • Science: Good Standing status granted • Graduation Rate: Good Standing

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

4 4

District Accountability Status: In Good Standing ✓ Chestnut Hill Elementary School ✓ Forest Park Elementary School ✓ Otsego Elementary School ✓ Paumanok Elementary School ✓ Signal Hill Elementary School ✓ Sunquam Elementary School ✓ Vanderbilt Elementary School ✓ Candlewood Middle School ✓ West Hollow Middle School ✓ High School East ✓ High School West

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

5 5

English - Language Arts

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

6 6

County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 3 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 80.0%

60.0%

40.0%

20.0% 0% District

County

State

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

7 7

County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 4 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4

80.0%

60.0%

40.0%

20.0% 0% District

County

State

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

8 8

County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 5 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4

90.0%

67.5%

45.0%

22.5% 0% District

County

State

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

9 9

ELA Grades 3-5 Performance Levels School Performance

AMO

200 175

187 168

150

178

183

177

176

143

143

144

144

144

144

144

Chestnut Hill

Forest Park

Otsego

Paumanok

Signal Hill

Sunquam

Vanderbilt

100

50

0

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

10 10

ELA Grades 3-8 Performance Index District Performance

AMO

190 143 95 48

E Dis con ad o m va ica nt ag lly ed

P LE

l Sr ac ial Mu

e W hit

As ia

n / P Isl acifi an c de r

ic an His p

Bla ck

led ab Di s

All S

tu

de nt

s

0

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

11 11

County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 6 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4

80.0%

60.0%

40.0%

20.0%

0% District

County

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

State

12 12

County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 7 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4

80.0%

60.0%

40.0%

20.0%

0% District

County

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

State

13 13

County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 8 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4

80.0%

60.0%

40.0%

20.0%

0% District

County

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

State

14 14

ELA Grades 6 - 8 Performance Levels School Performance

AMO

200 170 140

175

176

147

147

Candlewood

West Hollow

110 80 50

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

15 15

Mathematics

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

16 16

County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 3 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 90.0%

67.5%

45.0%

22.5%

0%

State County District

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

17 17

County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 4 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 90.0%

67.5%

45.0%

22.5%

0%

State County District

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

18 18

County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 5 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 90.0%

67.5%

45.0%

22.5%

0%

State County District

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

19 19

Math Grades 3-5 Performance Levels School Performance

AMO

200

180 150

191

181

190

189

186

182

157

157

158

158

158

158

158

Chestnut Hill

Forest Park

Otsego

Paumanok

Signal Hill

Sunquam

Vanderbilt

100

50

0

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

20 20

Math Grades 3-8 Performance Index District Performance Index

AMO

200 150 100 50

E Dis con ad o m va ica nt ag lly ed

P LE

l Sr ac ial Mu

e W hit

n / P Isl acifi an c de r

As ia

ic an His p

Bla ck

led ab Di s

All S

tu

de nt

s

0

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

21 21

County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 6 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 90.0%

67.5%

45.0%

22.5%

0%

State County District

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

22 22

County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 7 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 100.0%

75.0%

50.0%

25.0%

0%

State County District

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

23 23

County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 8 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 90.0%

67.5%

45.0%

22.5%

0%

State County District

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

24 24

Math Grades 6-8 Performance Levels School Performance

AMO

200 170 140

190

183 161

161

Candlewood

West Hollow

110 80 50

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

25 25

Science

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

26 26

County and State Comparisons Science - Grade 4 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 100.0%

75.0%

50.0% 25.0% 0% District

County

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

State

27 27

County and State Comparisons Science - Grade 8 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 100.0%

75.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% District

County

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

State

28 28

Science 4 & 8 Performance Index District Performance Index

AMO

200 150 100 50

E Dis con ad o m va ica nt ag lly ed

l Sr ac ial Mu

e W hit

n / P Isl acifi an c de r

As ia

ic an His p

Bla ck

led ab Di s

All S

tu

de nt

s

0

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

29 29

Science Grade 4 Performance Levels School Performance 200

199

194

199

199

169

169

169

169

Chestnut Hill

Forest Park

Otsego

Paumanok

188 150

AMO 192

195

168

169

169

Signal Hill

Sunquam

Vanderbilt

100

50

0

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

30 30

Science Grade 8 Performance Levels School Performance

AMO

200 170

195

194

173

174

Candlewood

West Hollow

140 110 80 50

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

31 31

New York State Regents Exams

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

32 32

New York State Regents Exams Comprehensive English 2011-2012 District

State

Outperform state by nearly 30 points 100.0%

75.0%

50.0%

25.0% Passed at 55%

Passed at 65%

0% Passed w/ Distinction

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

33 33

Secondary English Performance Index District Performance Index

AMO

200 150 100 50

E Dis con ad o m va ica nt ag lly ed

e W hit

n / P Isl acifi an c de r

As ia

ic an His p

Bla ck

led ab Di s

All S

tu

de nt

s

0

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

34 34

New York State Regents Exams Integrated Algebra 2011-2012 District

State

Outperform state by nearly 40 points 100.0%

75.0%

50.0%

25.0% Passed at 55%

Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

0%

35 35

New York State Regents Exams Living Environment 2011-2012 District

State

Outperform state by 41 points 100.0%

75.0%

50.0% 25.0% Passed at 55%

Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

0%

36 36

New York State Regents Exams US History and Government 2011-2012 District

State

Outperform state by 36 points 100.0%

75.0%

50.0%

25.0% Passed at 55%

Passed at 65%

0% Passed w/ Distinction

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

37 37

Advanced Placement Exams • Over 2200 exams written in 2011-2012 • 85% of all students achieved scores of 3, 4 or 5 § National average is 57% • Nearly 30% of all students achieved a score of 5 § National average is 14%

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

38 38

Graduation Rate Accountability

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

39 39

Graduation Rate Accountability Graduation Rate

AMO

100

75

50

25

E Dis con ad o m va ica nt ag lly ed

e W hit

ic an

n / P Isl acifi an c de r

As ia

IEP Diplomas & 5-Year grads are not considered graduates

His p

Bla ck

led ab Di s

All S

tu

de nt

s

0

NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

40 40

Graduation Rate Accountability 12%

3% 1% 2%

82%

4 Year College Military

94% of all graduates attending college 2 Year College Other

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

Employment

41 41

Half Hollow Hills 2011-2012 Performance Report

THANK YOU!

Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013

42 42