HALF HOLLOW HILLS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT of Huntington and Babylon
2010 – 11 Performance Report June 4, 2012
District Profile 2010 - 2011 • Enrollment: 9,882 • Free - Reduced Lunch: 10% • Limited English Proficient: 2% • Special Education: 14% • Race/Ethnic Origin § Black or African American: 13% § Hispanic or Latino: 5% § Asian / Pacific Islander: 12% § White: 68% § Multiracial: 1%
• Annual Attendance Rate: 96% Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
2
District Accountability • English-Language Arts: Good Standing • Mathematics: Good Standing • Science: Good Standing • Graduation Rate: Good Standing
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
3
District Accountability • English-Language Arts: Good Standing • Mathematics: Good Standing • Science: Good Standing • Graduation Rate: Good Standing
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
3
District Accountability • English-Language Arts: Good Standing • Mathematics: Good Standing Highest • Science: Good Standing status granted • Graduation Rate: Good Standing
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
3
District Assessment Statistics • Total number of New York State Assessments § § § §
• 18,952
3-8 ELA: 4,731 3-8 Math: 4,739 4 & 8 Science: 1,112 Regents Exams: 8,370
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
4
English - Language Arts
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
5
County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 3 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0% 0% District
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
State
6
County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 4 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0% 0% District
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
State
7
County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 5 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0% 0% District
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
State
8
ELA Grades 3-5 Performance Levels School Performance
AMO
200 185 150
162
100
116
Chestnut Hill
168
169
170
168
165
115
116
116
116
116
116
Forest Park
Otsego
Paumanok
Signal Hill
Sunquam
Vanderbilt
50
0
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
9
ELA Grades 3-8 Performance Index District Performance Index
AMO
180 135 90 45
P LE
W hit e
E Dis con ad om va ica nt ag lly ed
As ia
n / P Isl acifi an c de r
pa nic His
Bla ck
led ab Di s
All S
tu
de nt
s
0
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
10
County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 6 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0% District
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
State
11
County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 7 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0% District
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
State
12
County and State Comparisons ELA - Grade 8 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0% District
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
State
13
ELA Grades 6 - 8 Performance Levels School Performance
AMO
200 170
172
171
119
119
Candlewood
West Hollow
140 110 80 50
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
14
Mathematics
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
15
County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 3 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 0.900
0.675
0.450
0.225
0
State County District
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
16
County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 4 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 0.900
0.675
0.450
0.225
0
State County District
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
17
County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 5 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 0.900
0.675
0.450
0.225
0
State County District
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
18
Math Grades 3-5 Performance Levels School Performance
AMO
200
178
191 176
185
180
179
181
150 131
130
131
131
131
131
131
Chestnut Hill
Forest Park
Otsego
Paumanok
Signal Hill
Sunquam
Vanderbilt
100
50
0
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
19
Math Grades 3-8 Performance Index District Performance Index
AMO
200 150 100 50
E Dis con ad om va ica nt ag lly ed
P LE
W hit e
n / P Isl acifi an c de r
As ia
pa nic His
Bla ck
led ab Di s
All S
tu
de nt
s
0
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
20
County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 6 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 0.900
0.675
0.450
0.225
0
State County District
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
21
County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 7 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 0.900
0.675
0.450
0.225
0
State County District
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
22
County and State Comparisons Mathematics - Grade 8 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 0.900
0.675
0.450
0.225
0
State County District
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
23
Math Grades 6-8 Performance Levels School Performance
AMO
200 170
184
188
134
134
Candlewood
West Hollow
140 110 80 50
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
24
Science
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
25
County and State Comparisons Science - Grade 4 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 100.00%
75.00%
50.00% 25.00% 0% District
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
State
26
County and State Comparisons Science - Grade 8 Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 100.00%
75.00% 50.00% 25.00% 0% District
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
State
27
Science 4 & 8 Performance Index District Performance Index
AMO
200 150 100 50
E Dis con ad om va ica nt ag lly ed
W hit e
n / P Isl acifi an c de r
As ia
pa nic His
Bla ck
led ab Di s
All S
tu
de nt
s
0
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
28
Science Grade 4 Performance Levels School Performance 200
AMO
194
199
197
198
197
197
196
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Chestnut Hill
Forest Park
Otsego
Paumanok
Signal Hill
Sunquam
Vanderbilt
150
100
50
0
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
29
Science Grade 8 Performance Levels School Performance
AMO
200 193
195
100
100
Candlewood
West Hollow
170 140 110 80 50
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
30
New York State Regents Exams
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
31
New York State Regents Exams Comprehensive English 2010-2011 District
State 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65%
0% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
32
New York State Regents Exams Comprehensive English 2010-2011 District
State 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65%
0% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
32
New York State Regents Exams Comprehensive English 2010-2011 District
State
Outperform state by 30 points 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65%
0% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
32
Secondary English Performance Index District Performance Index
AMO
200 190 180 170
E Dis con ad om va ica nt ag lly ed
W hit e
n / P Isl acifi an c de r
As ia
pa nic His
Bla ck
led ab Di s
All S
tu
de nt
s
160
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
33
New York State Regents Exams Physical Setting: Earth Science 2010-2011 District
State 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
0%
34
New York State Regents Exams Physical Setting: Earth Science 2010-2011 District
State 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
0%
34
New York State Regents Exams Physical Setting: Earth Science 2010-2011 District
State
Outperform state by 31 points 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
0%
34
New York State Regents Exams Integrated Algebra 2010-2011 District
State 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
0%
35
New York State Regents Exams Integrated Algebra 2010-2011 District
State 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
0%
35
New York State Regents Exams Integrated Algebra 2010-2011 District
State
Outperform state by 41 points 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
0%
35
New York State Regents Exams Global History & Geography 2010-2011 District
State 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
0%
36
New York State Regents Exams Global History & Geography 2010-2011 District
State 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
0%
36
New York State Regents Exams Global History & Geography 2010-2011 District
State
Outperform state by 37 points 100.00%
75.00%
50.00%
25.00% Passed at 55%
Passed at 65% Passed w/ Distinction
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
0%
36
Advanced Placement Exams
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
37
Advanced Placement Exams • Nearly 2100 exams written in 2010-2011
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
37
Advanced Placement Exams • Nearly 2100 exams written in 2010-2011 • 84% of all students achieved scores of 3, 4 or 5
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
37
Advanced Placement Exams • Nearly 2100 exams written in 2010-2011 • 84% of all students achieved scores of 3, 4 or 5 § National average is 57%
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
37
Advanced Placement Exams • Nearly 2100 exams written in 2010-2011 • 84% of all students achieved scores of 3, 4 or 5 § National average is 57% • Nearly 30% of all students achieved a score of 5
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
37
Advanced Placement Exams • Nearly 2100 exams written in 2010-2011 • 84% of all students achieved scores of 3, 4 or 5 § National average is 57% • Nearly 30% of all students achieved a score of 5 § National average is 14%
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
37
Graduation Rate Accountability
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
38
Graduation Rate Accountability Graduation Rate
AMO
100
75
50
25
E Dis con ad om va ica nt ag lly ed
W hit e
n / P Isl acifi an c de r
As ia
Bla ck
led ab Di s
All S
tu
de nt
s
0
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
39
Graduation Rate Accountability Graduation Rate
AMO
100
75
50
25
E Dis con ad om va ica nt ag lly ed
W hit e
n / P Isl acifi an c de r
As ia
Bla ck
led ab Di s
All S
tu
de nt
s
0
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
39
Graduation Rate Accountability Graduation Rate
AMO
100
75
50
25
W hit e
n / P Isl acifi an c de r
E Dis con ad om va ica nt ag lly ed
IEP Diplomas & 5-Year grads are not considered graduates
As ia
Bla ck
led ab Di s
All S
tu
de nt
s
0
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
39
Graduation Rate Accountability 15%
2% 1% 1%
81%
4 Year College Military
96% of all graduates attending college 2 Year College Other
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Employment
40
Graduation Rate Accountability 15%
2% 1% 1%
81%
4 Year College Military
96% of all graduates attending college 2 Year College Other
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Employment
40
Half Hollow Hills 2010-2011 Performance Report
THANK YOU!
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
41
County and State Comparisons Elementary English - Language Arts Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 80
75
73
75
60
40
20 0 56 64 Grade 3
District
64 57 Grade 4
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
39 54 Grade 5
State
43
County and State Comparisons Secondary English - Language Arts Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 80
80 73
69
60
40
20 0 56 66 Grade 6
District
57 48 Grade 7
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
58 47 Grade 8
State
44
County and State Comparisons Elementary Mathematics Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 90
84
82
83
68
45
23 0 60 66 Grade 3
District
73 67 Grade 4
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
73 65 Grade 5
State
45
County and State Comparisons Secondary Mathematics Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4 90
89
86
88
68
45
23 0 63 72 Grade 6
District
75 64 Grade 7
County
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
60 70 Grade 8
State
46