Hofstra Horizons for Undergraduate and Graduate Research - Summer/Fall 2024 | Hofstra University

Page 1


HORIZONS

for Undergraduate and Graduate Research

provost’sCOLUMN

HORIZONS

for Undergraduate and Graduate Research

It is always a pleasure to recognize and celebrate the exceptional work being done by our students and their talented faculty mentors. The research featured in this issue of Hofstra Horizons exemplifies the passion, dedication, and intellectual curiosity that drive academic success at Hofstra University.

Our students, under the guidance of their faculty mentors, have contributed new knowledge to their fields while laying the groundwork for future achievements. Many students have presented their results at national and international conferences. These collaborative efforts between students and faculty enrich our academic community and underscore the importance of mentorship in fostering new knowledge and discovery.

Congratulations to all involved as your creativity, dedication, and perseverance are celebrated in the pages that follow.

Sincerely,

editor’s NOTE

This issue presents just a glimpse into the impressive range of research undertaken by undergraduate and graduate students in the 2023-2024 academic year. Our students have invested significant effort into crafting rigorous methodologies, with a keen focus on both the practical applications and the theoretical contributions of their work.

It is my great pleasure to celebrate the remarkable achievements showcased in this edition of Hofstra Horizons. The research presented here, developed in close collaboration with dedicated faculty mentors, exemplifies Hofstra’s commitment to academic excellence, intellectual curiosity, and a passion for discovery.

As Vice Provost, I continue to be deeply inspired by the innovation and perseverance that our students bring to their research. In the face of challenges, they exhibit resilience and an unwavering commitment to advancing knowledge in their fields. This speaks not only to their individual dedication but also to the invaluable support and mentorship provided by our faculty.

Congratulations to all of our student researchers and their mentors. Your hard work advances your personal and academic growth, while enhancing the larger academic community.

Keep pushing boundaries, asking bold questions, and striving for excellence.

With appreciation,

Project Title:

The Effectiveness of Ultrasound as a Diagnostic Tool Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Mechanical Testing of Bones With Induced Osteoporosis

Christina Karras investigated the effectiveness of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for osteoporosis, comparing it to the current gold standard, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DeXA). Her study aimed to determine whether ultrasound could be a reliable and accessible alternative for measuring bone density.

Karras’ research involved a series of experiments using bone samples exposed to formic acid to simulate osteoporosis. She used both DeXA and ultrasound imaging to assess the bone mineral density and echogenicity of the bones. Mechanical testing was performed to evaluate the ultimate compressive stress of the bones. Karras analyzed the correlation between the ultrasound imaging results and the DeXA bone mineral density values, using statistical tests to determine the significance of her findings.

The need for more accessible and less invasive diagnostic tools for osteoporosis, which affects millions of people worldwide inspired Karras’ interest. Ultrasound, typically used for vascular and tissue imaging, has potential as a diagnostic tool for bone health due to its noninvasive nature and lower cost. Karras sought to explore whether ultrasound could effectively measure bone density and serve as an alternative to DeXA, especially in settings with limited access to advanced imaging technologies.

Karras’ research demonstrated that ultrasound imaging, through quantitative texture analysis, can be a valid method for assessing bone density. Her findings showed a significant correlation between the percentage of echogenicity from ultrasound images and the bone mineral density measured by DeXA. The results indicated that ultrasound could effectively detect changes in bone density, making it a promising alternative for osteoporosis screening. Additionally, the mechanical testing confirmed that the bone samples’ strength decreased as they were exposed to acid, further validating the induced osteoporosis model used in the study.

Dr. Sleiman R. Ghorayeb supported her throughout the research process by continuously providing mentorship and navigating challenges to help Karras refine her research methods and presentation skills. His support was crucial in helping her complete her honors thesis and prepare for post-graduation opportunities.

Karras plans to work as a medical assistant in training at a dermatology office while continuing to engage with Dr. Ghorayeb’s lab to mentor students and further develop her research skills. She also intends to take the MCAT and pursue an MA in Engineering Management at Hofstra University in the fall, indicating her commitment to advancing her career in biomedical engineering and health care.

Ashley

Project Title:

Understanding Hofstra’s Preference for Bottled v. Tap Water

Advisor: Dr. Oskar Pineño

Miller’s research stemmed from the growing trend of bottled water consumption despite the availability of free, filtered tap water on campus.

Ashley Miller investigated the preferences of Hofstra students when selecting water for purchase on campus, specifically comparing bottled water to tap water available at hydration stations. Miller conducted a taste test experiment in which participants sampled four types of water: Aquafina, Dasani, Smartwater, and tap water from a hydration station. The water samples were either correctly labeled or disguised as brand-name waters. Participants then rated the water on a scale of 1 to 10, allowing Miller to compare their preferences based on taste and brand perception.

Miller’s research stemmed from the growing trend of bottled water consumption despite the availability of free, filtered tap water on campus. The 2014 Flint, Michigan, water crisis heightened concerns about tap water safety, yet bottled water, which often contains harmful microplastics, remained popular. Miller aimed to understand why students might prefer bottled water over tap water, even when both are readily available on campus.

The results of Miller’s study revealed that students generally rated brand-name bottled water higher than tap water when they knew the labels. However, when tap water was disguised as a brand-name bottled water, it was rated just as highly, if not higher, than the actual bottled water. This suggests that brand perception significantly influences student preferences, often more than the actual taste of the water itself.

Miller was guided by her advisor, Dr. Oskar Pineño, who supported her in designing and conducting the experiment. Dr. Pineño aided Miller in navigating the process of conducting research on campus. She plans to continue her education by pursuing a master’s degree in occupational therapy starting in fall 2024. Miller is committed to furthering her studies and applying her research skills in future academic and professional endeavors.

PhD, Applied Organizational Psychology, Spring 2025 • Hometown: Smithtown, NY

Joseph Ha

PhD, Applied Organizational Psychology, Spring 2025 • Hometown: Salisbury, MD

Project Title:

An Exploration of Fluid Team Effectiveness: Does Existing Team Science Apply?

Brianna Billotti and Joseph Ha conducted research on the effectiveness of fluid teams, focusing on how traditional team science applies to these dynamic groups. Fluid teams are characterized by members who come together quickly, often without a shared history, to perform critical tasks before disbanding. Billotti and Ha utilized a combination of critical incident techniques and thematic analysis to gather data from healthcare professionals and students participating in simulation-based education. They collected reflections from participants, focusing on the factors that promote or hinder the effectiveness of fluid teams. Their analysis identified key themes related to the roles, including leadership, communication, and socio-emotional processes. Their findings were compared to existing literature on traditional teams.

The study was motivated by the increasing prevalence of fluid teams in high-stakes environments like health care, where rapid team formation and effective performance are crucial. Traditional team science often does not fully account for the unique challenges of fluid teams, such as role ambiguity and high stress levels. Billotti and Ha aimed to address this gap by providing insights into how fluid teams operate and offer recommendations for improving their effectiveness.

The research revealed that fluid teams face distinct challenges compared to traditional teams, including issues with role clarity, leadership, and communication. A clear and effective leader was found to be crucial for guiding fluid teams, especially in high-stress environments. The study also highlighted the importance of explicit communication and the quick development of trust among team members who lack a shared history. Their findings suggest that traditional team strategies need to be adapted to better support fluid teams.

Billotti and Ha were mentored by Dr. Rebecca Grossman, who provided them with the structure and support needed to conduct their research independently. Dr. Grossman’s guidance was instrumental in helping them navigate the complexities of their study, and allowed them the freedom to explore their ideas, whether they were research-oriented or practice-oriented. The group triad published their work on fluid teams in Frontiers in Psychology journal (Vol. 15) in accordance with Dr. Michael Cassara, vice president of interprofessional education, research, and practice at Northwell Health, and associate professor of graduate nursing at Hofstra Northwell School of Nursing and Physician Assistant Studies.

Both researchers plan to continue exploring the dynamics of fluid teams. Billotti is focusing on quantifiable results and plans to use their research to inform team-training interventions that can enhance performance in health care and other high-stakes environments. Ha is interested in applying their findings to consulting, particularly in understanding how fluid team dynamics can be leveraged in corporate settings.

Project Title:

Activation of Toll-Like Receptors by the C. neoformans

Capsule Polysaccharide During Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption

Advisor:

Jaspreet Kaur conducted research on the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans (C. neoformans), specifically investigating how its polysaccharide capsule affected the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and contributed to the pathogen’s ability to cause meningitis. The research focused on understanding the signaling mechanisms that enabled the fungus to invade the brain by disrupting the BBB.

Kaur carried out several lab experiments using human brain cells to model the BBB. She studied how two specific proteins on the surface of these cells, called Toll-like receptors (i.e, TLR2 and TLR4), reacted when exposed to the fungal capsule. Her experiments involved techniques to detect whether these receptors were activated after being exposed to the fungal component. Additionally, Kaur used imaging techniques, immunoprecipitation, and western blotting to observe changes in the cell structures after this exposure.

C. neoformans is a deadly pathogen, especially for people with weakened immune systems, causing about 200,000 deaths worldwide each year. Understanding how this fungus breaks through the BBB is crucial for developing new treatments to prevent and manage cryptococcal meningitis. Kaur’s research aimed to uncover the ways in which this fungus interacted with human cells to pave the way for its invasion into the brain.

Kaur discovered that one of the receptors, TLR2, was activated by the fungal capsule, suggesting it played a key role in allowing the fungus to break through the BBB. The other receptor, TLR4, seemed to break down after exposure, indicating it might have had a different role in this process. Her research also showed that the fungal capsule caused changes in the cells that made it easier for the fungus to pass through the barrier. These findings pointed to TLR2 as an important target for future research aimed at developing treatments to block the fungus from invading the brain.

Kaur described her supportive mentorship with Dr. Michael R. Dores as being crucial in her research on C. neoformans and the BBB. Dr. Dores guided her through complex concepts and provided her with essential research papers. He also assisted her in collecting data, maintaining cell cultures, and performing new lab protocols. Kaur plans to continue her education and attend medical school to maintain her scientific and academic pursuits.

Project Title:

Microzooplankton Biomass Increases With Dissolved Oxygen and Food Proxies in Hempstead Harbor During Summer

Abigail Salgado, under the advisement of Dr. Luciana Santoferrara, conducted research focused on the relationship between microzooplankton biomass and dissolved oxygen (DO) levels in Hempstead Harbor, a part of Long Island Sound. Their study aimed to explore how hypoxia, or low oxygen levels, affected these tiny but crucial organisms that play a key role in aquatic food webs.

Salgado’s efforts involved field sampling at four different sites within Hempstead Harbor during the summer of 2023, collecting data from two different depths across five dates. The samples were then fixed, prepared, and analyzed using inverted microscopy. Salgado and her team measured, counted, and classified thousands of microzooplankton organisms. They focused on various groups, including ciliates, dinoflagellates, and microcrustaceans. Statistical analyses were conducted to correlate microzooplankton biomass with DO levels, depth, chlorophyll concentration, and bacterioplankton abundance.

Salgado expressed the importance of better understanding the impacts of hypoxia on the lower levels of the aquatic food web, specifically on microzooplankton, which are vital for nutrient cycling and energy transfer in marine ecosystems. While the negative effects of hypoxia on larger aquatic animals are well known, its influence on microbial communities remains less clear. This research aimed to fill that knowledge gap, particularly in the context of Hempstead Harbor.

The results revealed that there were more microzooplankton in areas with higher oxygen levels in the water, compared to areas with lower oxygen. It also showed that the amount of these tiny organisms was connected to how deep the water was and how much food (like algae and bacteria) was available. This means that while oxygen is important, the amount of food in the water is also a big factor. The researchers suggested more studies were needed to figure out which of these factors was more important in controlling the number of microzooplankton.

Salgado appreciated the opportunity to work with Dr. Santoferrara, particularly noting the significance of being one of the first to conduct research on microzooplankton in Hempstead Harbor under her guidance. She reflected upon her positive collaboration with Dr. Santoferrara as playing a pivotal role in mentoring and supporting her research efforts. Salgado initially planned to attend medical school, but her research experience with Dr. Santoferrara inspired her to consider pursuing a PhD. She intends to take a gap year after her senior year to apply, aiming for the 2026-2027 academic year. Currently, she is considering whether to focus on clinical work, research, or both.

Project Title:

• Hometown: New Hyde Park, NY

Growth Promotion and Interactions Between

Sphingobium sp. AEW4 and Herbaspirillum sp. SJZ99 as Potential Wheat Biofertilizers

Advisor: Dr. Javier Izquierdo

Naya Mahabir conducted research on the interactions between two bacterial strains, Sphingobium sp. AEW4 and Herbaspirillum sp. SJZ99, to explore their potential use as biofertilizers for wheat crops. Her project aimed to determine whether these microbes could enhance plant growth when used together and to identify the conditions under which they are most effective.

Mahabir grew the two bacterial strains both individually and together in controlled lab settings. She then inoculated wheat seedlings with these strains and measured various growth parameters, including root length, shoot length, and overall plant weight. Additionally, she conducted experiments to observe how the strains interacted with each other in different environments, such as on plates versus in liquid. Sustainable agricultural practices (e.g., biofertilizers) can enhance crop growth without relying on chemical fertilizers, which underscore the importance of continuing to find ways to replace wasteful processes. Understanding how these microbes interact, and their combined effects on plant growth, could lead to the development of effective biofertilizers that improve crop yield and resilience, particularly under stress conditions.

Mahabir’s research found that co-inoculating wheat plants with both bacterial strains resulted in a significant increase in plant weight and shoot length compared to plants inoculated with either strain alone. However, the growth of the strains was affected when they were co-cultured, with each strain inhibiting the growth of the other under different conditions. These findings suggested that while the combination of these microbes can enhance plant growth, their interactions are complex and context-dependent, requiring further study to optimize their use as biofertilizers.

During the early stages of her research, Dr. Izquierdo helped Mahabir understand the research process and the microbes she was working with. He provided ongoing support through weekly check-ins, encouraging her continual learning not only within the scope of the project, but also in other academic areas and personal development. This supportive environment helped her navigate challenges and stay motivated throughout her research. After graduation, Mahabir plans to pursue a future career in medicine.

Project Title:

Time to Graduation in STEM at Long Island Universities (Fall 2023) and Analyzing STEM Student Graduation Rates at Long Island Universities (Spring 2023)

Homan’s work specifically sought to identify how various demographic and academic factors impact time to graduation.

Skylar Homan, a student involved in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) network, conducted research on factors influencing the time to graduation for STEM students at Long Island universities, with a focus on Hofstra and Adelphi. Under the mentorship of Dr. Kira Adaricheva, and in collaboration with professors from multiple institutions, Homan analyzed demographic and academic data from students enrolled between 2010 and 2015. The research aimed to uncover the key factors that affect the time to degree completion and graduation rates for STEM students.

Homan’s work specifically sought to identify how various demographic and academic factors impact time to graduation. Using data from both universities, Homan examined variables such as GPA, initial STEM courses taken, credits attempted/completed, and major academic changes. The researcher utilized the D-basis algorithm, which allowed for the detection of patterns and associations in binary datasets. This algorithm was applied to explore how early academic performance and major changes influenced the likelihood of graduating in four years versus taking longer. Regular meetings with Dr. Adaricheva guided Homan’s progress, which led to two poster presentations and a research paper.

Homan’s second stage of the research explored the factors that influence and improve graduation rates among STEM majors. This work is part of a larger National Science Foundation-supported initiative aimed at making STEM education more effective and accessible. Homan’s analysis revealed key findings: Students who performed well during their first year were much more likely to graduate within four years, whereas those who struggled early on often took longer. Interestingly, among Hofstra students, switching from a STEM major to a non-STEM major was associated with faster graduation.

Looking ahead, Homan plans to publish these findings and expand the analysis by incorporating additional data from other Long Island institutions. The researcher is also pursuing a software development internship, aiming to explore this career path before completing their final academic semester.

BS, Environmental Resources, Spring 2025 • Hometown: Easton, PA

Project Title:

Changes in Holocene Sea Surface Temperature in the Central North Atlantic Based on Abundance of Planktonic Foraminifera

Grassia’s longstanding interest in the ocean and the desire to understand past climate conditions drove her research ambitions.

Francesca Grassia analyzed fossilized single-celled organisms to research past climate conditions. Her project focused on identifying different species of these organisms to serve as proxies for estimating historical temperatures, particularly during the Holocene period, which spans the last 11,000 years. She collected approximately 200 samples of fossilized organisms. By identifying four key species within these samples, she was able to compare the data against existing climate datasets to infer temperature changes over time. This analysis helped her identify specific warm and cool periods, including previously undocumented events that might suggest abrupt climate shifts. Grassia’s longstanding interest in the ocean and the desire to understand past climate conditions drove her research ambitions. Her work is particularly relevant for filling gaps in the climate record, such as the relatively cool period she identified around 7,500 years ago.

Grassia’s research provided evidence of temperature fluctuations during the Holocene period, including a warm interglacial period and two notably cooler periods. One of her significant findings was identifying a previously undocumented cooling event that occurred around 7,500 years ago. Her work suggests that this event may have been abrupt, and she hopes to further investigate and confirm this by continuing to fill in the climate curve she has been developing.

She was mentored by Dr. E. Christa Farmer, who provided continual support and encouragement throughout the research process. Dr. Farmer pushed Grassia to excel and facilitated her participation in the American Geophysical Union conference, where Grassia presented her research. This experience was invaluable for Grassia, as it allowed her to network with other researchers and gain exposure to the broader scientific community.

Grassia plans to continue her studies in ocean or marine conservation, with a strong interest in pursuing graduate school. She is fascinated by ocean life and is currently working toward becoming a certified scuba diver, which aligns with her professional and personal goals in marine conservation.

BS,

and Math, May 2024 • Hometown: Storforshei, Norway

Project Title:

Jansky Very Large Array Low-Frequency Radio Survey of M83

By studying M83, a nearby galaxy with active star formation and multiple known supernovae, she aimed to contribute to the field of astrophysics by identifying new supernova remnants candidates and exploring their characteristics.

Ronja Olsen performed a high-resolution radio survey of the spiral galaxy M83 using data from the Jansky Very Large Array (JVLA). Her research focused on identifying and analyzing supernova remnants within this galaxy, which has experienced multiple supernovae in the last century. She used data at 6 GHz and 1.5 GHz frequencies from the Jansky VLA to map radio sources within galaxy M83. Olsen performed manual calibration and flagging to reduce radio frequency interference and applied various imaging techniques to enhance the accuracy of her findings. She compared her catalog of radio sources with previous surveys, including optical and X-ray data.

Olsen hoped to better understand the lifecycle of supernova remnants and their role in the evolution of galaxies. By studying M83, a nearby galaxy with active star formation and multiple known supernovae, she aimed to contribute to the field of astrophysics by identifying new supernova remnants candidates and exploring their characteristics. Olsen identified more than 350 radio sources in M83, with approximately 170 of them being newly reported radio sources. About 100 of these sources were categorized as supernova remnants candidates, including up to 30 that did not have corresponding optical or X-ray counterparts. Her findings suggest the presence of previously undetected supernova remnants and contribute to the understanding of their radio properties and the survey biases that might affect their detection.

Dr. Christina Lacey provided essential support that facilitated Olsen to develop her skills in radio astronomy and data analysis, ultimately leading to the successful completion of her project and her participation in the American Astronomical Society conference. After graduation, Olsen plans to continue her research in astrophysics, with a particular interest in galaxy evolution and the study of supernova remnants. She has been accepted into graduate programs, including a master’s in astrophysics at Cambridge and a PhD in Earth and Planetary Science at Harvard, reflecting her commitment to advancing her career in this field.

Nicholas Frosina

BA, Political Science, Fall 2025 • Hometown: Queens, NY

Project Title:

Frederick Douglass on the Importance of Intellectual Freedom

Advisor: Dr. Alan Singer

Frosina’s research highlighted that Douglass viewed intellectual freedom as central to achieving true freedom.

Nicholas Frosina researched the role of intellectual freedom in the life and activism of Frederick Douglass. His project, part of the course, New York and Slavery, focused on how Douglass’ emphasis on intellectual freedom helped transition abolitionist ideas from fringe to mainstream.

Frosina analyzed Douglass’ writings and speeches, focusing on his belief in the importance of education, freedom of speech, and the press as tools for emancipation and social change. He explored Douglass’ journey of self-education and intellectual liberation, as well as his ideological differences with other abolitionists and his efforts to amplify Black voices through his newspaper, The North Star

Frosina was driven by his interest in the antebellum period and the abolitionist movement and how these historical forces connect to modern themes of civil rights and democracy. He sought to understand how Douglass’ focus on intellectual freedom empowered marginalized voices and drove social and political change.

Frosina’s research highlighted that Douglass viewed intellectual freedom as central to achieving true freedom. Douglass argued that the ability to think, speak, and write freely was essential to combating slavery and oppression. This belief often put him at odds with other abolitionists but allowed him to create a unique and influential voice within the movement.

Dr. Alan Singer provided Frosina with valuable feedback as he helped him connect historical events to contemporary issues, emphasizing the importance of intellectual freedom in social justice. Frosina plans to pursue a legal education, focusing on property or international law. He remains interested in the intersection of democracy and intellectual freedom, which he aims to explore further in his academic and professional career.

Jazmin Jedrzejczyk

Project Title:

In the Matter of the Highest Court in the Land v. the Court of Public Opinion: The Dobbs Decision and Its Effect on the Legitimacy of the Supreme Court

Advisor: Dr. David M. Green

Jazmin Jedrzejczyk conducted research on the impact of the 2022 Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization on the Court’s legitimacy. Her study focused on understanding whether this decision, which overturned the constitutional right to abortion, influenced public perceptions of the Supreme Court’s legitimacy, particularly in terms of ideological disagreement.

Jedrzejczyk employed a mixed-methods research approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection. She conducted surveys with approximately 100 Hofstra students and interviewed 20 participants to gather their opinions on the Supreme Court’s legitimacy following the Dobbs decision. She analyzed the data to explore how factors like civic awareness, political affiliation, and ideological preferences affected perceptions of the Court.

The study was motivated by a historic drop in Supreme Court approval ratings, particularly after the Dobbs decision. Jedrzejczyk aimed to investigate whether ideological disagreement with the Court’s conservative stance played a role in diminishing its legitimacy. By exploring this, she hoped to contribute to the broader understanding of how controversial rulings can polarize public opinion and affect the perceived authority of judicial institutions.

Jedrzejczyk’s research revealed that public perceptions of the Supreme Court’s legitimacy are indeed influenced by ideological disagreement. Her findings indicated that those who disagreed with the Court’s ideological stance, particularly after the Dobbs decision, ascribed lower levels of legitimacy to the Court. The study also suggested that demographic factors, such as political affiliation, played a role in how people viewed the Court’s legitimacy. Her research underscored the vulnerability of the Court to polarization, with liberals, in particular, viewing the Court as less legitimate due to its perceived conservative bias.

Throughout her research, Jedrzejczyk worked closely alongside her advisor, Dr. David Green. He introduced her to statistical software and provided ongoing assistance, helping her to deepen her understanding of the topic and refine her research methods. Their collaboration, which extended throughout the summer, was key to the development and success of her thesis. Following graduation, Jedrzejczyk plans to continue her academic journey by attending law school at St. John’s University. She intends to further explore the intersection of law, politics, and public opinion, building on the insights gained from her undergraduate research.

BA, Political Science and Economics, Spring 2024 • Hometown: Levittown, NY

Project Title:

China’s Challenge to American Hegemony: An Analysis of China’s Encroachment to the American Sphere of Influence

Advisor: Dr. Paul Fritz

Her research sought to understand the dynamics of global power shifts, specifically how China’s economic growth and strategic investments are altering the balance of power traditionally held by the U.S.

Molly Botros researched the growing challenge China poses to American hegemony, focusing on China’s expanding influence in Latin America through economic and political strategies, particularly the Belt and Road Initiative. Botros employed a mixed-methods approach, using quantitative data on trade volumes, foreign direct investment, and loans between China, Latin America, and the United States. She applied Robert Gilpin’s theory of hegemonic conflict to analyze the implications of China’s rise in relation to U.S. dominance in Latin America.

Her research sought to understand the dynamics of global power shifts, specifically how China’s economic growth and strategic investments are altering the balance of power traditionally held by the U.S. She further intended to highlight the potential long-term implications of China’s influence on global governance and the liberal international order.

Botros’ work revealed that while Latin America is moving away from American influence, it has not yet fully entered China’s sphere. However, China’s significant growth in trade and investment in the region indicates a strategic challenge to American hegemony. Her findings suggest that China’s influence in Latin America is poised to have substantial global implications, potentially reshaping international relations and economic systems.

She was mentored by Dr. Paul Fritz, who played a pivotal role in guiding her through the complexities of international relations theory and research methodologies, providing critical feedback that helped her refine her research questions and approach to ensure her analysis was both rigorous and insightful. Botros plans to pursue a career in law, specifically in banking regulation and financial advisory. She is also considering further exploration of the economic aspects of global power dynamics and may continue to engage in related research in the future.

Maria Moreno-Suarez

BA, Psychology, December 2024 • Hometown: Glen Head, NY

Project Title:

The Power of Contemporary Popular Music in Peru: Quechua Is Resistance

Advisor: Dr. Conrad Herold and Dr. Benita Sampedro

The musicians she studied blend traditional Quechua elements with modern music styles, creating a platform to raise awareness about the challenges faced by their communities.

Maria Moreno-Suarez examined the role of contemporary music in Peru as a form of cultural resistance, focusing on how Quechua, an indigenous language, is being revitalized and preserved through modern music genres. This involved studying the works of contemporary Peruvian musicians such as Renata Flores, Liberato Kani, and Kayfex. She analyzed how these artists use Quechua in their music to address social issues, reclaim cultural identity, and resist historical oppression. Her study included a review of music videos, song lyrics, and interviews with these artists to understand the cultural significance of their work.

Her personal connection to Peruvian culture and her interest in the intersection of language, music, and identity propelled her interests. She aimed to explore how music can serve as a powerful tool for cultural preservation and resistance, particularly for indigenous communities that have faced centuries of marginalization.

Moreno-Suarez found that contemporary Quechua music is not just a means of entertainment but a form of resistance against cultural erasure. The musicians she studied blend traditional Quechua elements with modern music styles, creating a platform to raise awareness about the challenges faced by their communities. Her research highlights how these artists are helping to shift the perception of Quechua as a form of opposition to being recognized as a valuable cultural resource.

Dr. Conrad Herold and Dr. Benita Sampedro supported her throughout her research. Dr. Herold provided insights from his own experience as a Peruvian, helping Moreno-Suarez connect her research to the broader cultural and historical context. Dr. Sampedro introduced her to Renata Flores, one of the key artists in her study. After she finishes her undergraduate studies, Moreno-Suarez plans to attend graduate school, where she intends to continue her studies in fields supportive of cultural preservation and social justice. She has been increasing her involvement in community service.

BA, Psychology, December 2024 • Hometown: Glen Head, NY

Project Title:

From Adversity to Growth: Resiliency Within the LGBTQ Community

Advisor: Dr. Nicholas Salter

John Morrissey pursued research on resiliency within the LGBTQ community, focusing on how individuals transform adversity into growth. His study examined the prevalence of discrimination and trauma experienced by LGBTQ individuals and how these challenges can lead to posttraumatic growth where individuals emerge stronger and more resilient.

Morrissey’s research involved a comprehensive literature review that explored the intersectionality within the LGBTQ community and the various forms of discrimination they face, including overt emotional and physical abuse and microaggressions. He analyzed how post-traumatic growth occurs when individuals confront their challenges directly and find meaning in their experiences, often with the help of strong social and financial support systems. His study also highlighted prominent individuals within the LGBTQ community who have become leaders after overcoming significant adversity.

He was driven by a passion for expanding psychological research and understanding the transformative process of post-traumatic growth. He aimed to shed light on how resilience is developed within the LGBTQ community and how overcoming adversity can shape individuals into stronger versions of themselves. Morrissey’s research emphasizes how the experience of adversity can lead to personal growth and leadership within the LGBTQ community. His work suggests that with the right support, individuals can turn their suffering into a source of strength.

Morrissey worked with Dr. Nick Salter, who provided strong support throughout the research process. Dr. Salter helped Morrissey get involved in lab work and advised him on setting up a path for his postgraduation plans, particularly a master’s degree in industrial and organizational (I/O) psychology. He is interested in joining DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) labs to continue his research on post-traumatic growth and resilience.

Project Title:

Hope and Grit

Advisor: Dr. Holly J. Seirup

Her study focused on understanding how exposure to trauma can impact students’ academic performance and how factors like hope and grit can help mitigate these effects.

Jacqueline Villegas conducted research on the relationship between trauma, hope, grit, and academic success among college students. Her study focused on understanding how exposure to trauma can impact students’ academic performance and how factors like hope and grit can help mitigate these effects.

Villegas’ research involved collecting data from undergraduate students, aiming for about 200 participants. The study used surveys to measure the students’ exposure to trauma, levels of hope and grit, and their academic performance. She utilized statistical analysis to explore the connections between these variables, with the goal of identifying patterns that could inform interventions to support trauma-affected students.

Villegas was motivated by the high prevalence of trauma among students and long-term effects on their mental, physical, and academic well-being. She aimed to uncover ways that educators and policymakers can support students who have experienced trauma, helping them succeed academically despite these challenges.

Final results are pending, as Villegas is still in the data collection phase. However, she hopes her research will reveal important insights into how hope and grit can serve as protective factors for students dealing with trauma. These findings could lead to the development of strategies and interventions to help students navigate their academic paths more successfully.

Villegas was advised by Dr. Holly J. Seirup, who supported her long-term research goals and provided mentorship throughout the project. Dr. Seirup’s guidance was instrumental in shaping Villegas’ research direction and ensuring she had the resources needed to pursue her study. Villegas plans to take a break from academics to work before returning to pursue a master’s degree in counseling. She is also involved in other research projects, including a study on the brain’s reward process in individuals with eating disorders and an independent project examining the role of social media in ADHD self-diagnosis.

BA, Sustainability, Spring 2026 • Hometown: Felton, DE

Project Title:

Managing Invasive Plant Species in the Hofstra Bird Sanctuary

Advisor: Dr. J. Bret Bennington

MeiLi Haan conducted research on managing invasive plant species in the Hofstra Bird Sanctuary, aiming to restore and preserve native plant species within this important wildlife habitat on campus. Haan established three test sites within the sanctuary, where she and her team planted native species such as purple aster, big bluestem, and woolgrass. The team employed hand pulling and cutting methods to remove invasive species, such as mugwort, Japanese honeysuckle, and Oriental bittersweet. Data on plant survival and competition were collected to assess the effectiveness of different management techniques. The project also utilized ArcGIS software to map the sanctuary and track invasive species growth.

Haan was driven by her passion for sustainability and her experienced gained during an internship in Delaware. She wanted to make a positive impact on the Hofstra Bird Sanctuary, which had suffered neglect after Superstorm Sandy, by promoting the growth of native species and controlling the spread of invasive plants.

Haan found that the success of native plants varied depending on the location within the sanctuary. The middle section of the sanctuary was the most successful in supporting native plant growth, while the bottom section faced challenges due to flooding. The research highlighted the importance of continuous management and the potential for further expansion of native plantings in the sanctuary.

This was Haan’s first experience managing a project with multiple collaborators, and Dr. J. Bret Bennington was instrumental in facilitating the project and ensuring its success. Haan described Dr. Bennington as someone who genuinely wants student projects to excel, and she appreciated the opportunity to work closely with him during the research and on a trip to the Galapagos Islands, which paralleled her experience as his research student.

Haan plans to continue working on the Hofstra Bird Sanctuary project over the next two years, aiming to secure funding and expand the impact of her work. She also hopes to attend graduate school in the future, with an interest in urban development and urban planning. Currently, Haan is doing an internship in these areas and is excited to explore her options further.

BA, Sustainability Studies and Geography concentration in GIS, May 2024 • Hometown: New York City, NY

Project Title:

Coloring Outside of the Lines: Using Sketch Mapping to Map Safety and Fear for LGBTQIA+ Students Amidst Anti-LGBTQIA+

Legislation

Advisor: Dr. Craig Dalton

Correa’s findings revealed that students tend to feel safer in areas with progressive, Democraticleaning governments that actively protect LGBTQIA+ rights.

Natalie Correa explored how LGBTQIA+ college students perceive safety and fear in the context of rising anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation in the United States. She aimed to map the geographical areas where students feel safe or unsafe based on their lived experiences and the political climate of those regions. To do so, Correa employed qualitative methods, conducting 29 in-depth interviews with LGBTQIA+ students. Participants used sketch maps to mark areas where they felt safe, fearful, or uncertain. The data from these interviews were digitized using ArcGIS Pro, allowing Correa to create a spatial analysis that visually represented the perceived safety and fear across different states. The study also considered factors such as community experiences, political climates, and legislative impacts on LGBTQIA+ protections.

The motivation for Correa’s research stemmed from the alarming increase in anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation across the U.S. With more than 525 bills introduced in 2023 alone, there was a pressing need to understand how such legislation influences the perceptions and behaviors of LGBTQIA+ students, particularly in terms of where they feel safe to live, study, and work.

Correa’s findings revealed that students tend to feel safer in areas with progressive, Democratic-leaning governments that actively protect LGBTQIA+ rights. Conversely, fear and uncertainty were prevalent in regions with conservative, Republican-leaning governments where restrictive laws are being enacted. Her research underscores the significant impact of political and social climates on the well-being and decision-making of LGBTQIA+ individuals.

Dr. Craig Dalton played a crucial role in guiding her through the research process by helping her to further refine her research questions and methodology. Correa would like to pursue a master’s degree in cartography/GIS, with a focus on the intersections of queer identity and space. She is particularly interested in exploring how marginalized communities navigate and create safe spaces within a challenging sociopolitical landscape.

BS, Pre-Med Studies, May 2024 • Hometown: Queens, NY

Project Title:

Nuclear Translocation of Full-Length ACE-2 Is Induced by SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein

Advisor: Dr. Michael R. Dores

Varun Sridhar conducted research on how the SARS-CoV-2 virus, responsible for COVID-19, interacted with the ACE2 receptor in human lung cells. His study aimed to uncover what happens to the ACE2 receptor after the virus binds to it, focusing on its potential role in influencing gene expression and contributing to inflammation.

Sridhar used molecular techniques, including immunofluorescence microscopy and western blotting, to track the movement and changes in the ACE2 receptor within infected lung cells. By staining the ACE2 receptors and observing their behavior in response to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, he was able to visualize how the receptor moved from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Western blotting helped him quantify the presence of ACE2 in different parts of the cell over time.

Sridhar sought to better understand the mechanisms by which COVID-19 affects the body, particularly at the cellular level. While much was known about how the virus binds to the ACE2 receptor to enter cells, there was little understanding of what happens to the receptor afterward. Sridhar’s study aimed to explore this unexplored area, which could provide insights into how COVID-19 leads to severe symptoms and potentially open new avenues for treatment.

He discovered that after binding with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the ACE2 receptor translocated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus of the cell. This movement suggested that ACE2 may play a role in regulating gene expression, potentially influencing the inflammatory response seen in COVID-19 patients. His findings indicated that ACE2 is not just a gateway for the virus but may also contribute to the disease’s pathology by affecting cellular processes at the genetic level.

Sridhar was guided by his advisor, Dr. Michael Dores, who provided him with both the technical knowledge and the independence to explore his own ideas. Dr. Dores’s mentorship was instrumental in helping Sridhar grow as a researcher, particularly in gaining confidence in laboratory techniques and the overall research process. He plans to continue his education at the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, and will take a gap year to gain clinical experience before entering medical school in 2025. Sridhar is interested in specializing in neuroscience, drawn by the complexities of the brain and the many unknowns surrounding neurological diseases.

PhD, Educational Leadership Program, Spring 2025 • Hometown: Dix Hills, NY

Project Title:

School Leadership’s Role in Shaping Parents’ and Retired Teachers’ Perspectives of Shared Reading

Rosslee wanted to understand the role of shared reading in shaping children’s attitudes toward reading and how school leadership can promote and support these practices.

Julie Rosslee conducted a pilot study to explore how school leadership influences the perspectives of parents and retired teachers on shared reading practices with young children. She observed two adult-child reading pairs in their homes, interviewed the adult reading partners, and conducted a focus group with three retired teachers. The retired teachers were able to contribute insight from their professional expertise, which aided Rosslee in her investigation of attitudes surrounding shared reading. They provided further insights into the internal and external implications of the administration’s leadership behind shared-reading program initiatives. Rosslee also analyzed various documents and online resources from the school district, including reading programs and initiatives. She identified key themes related to the impact of shared reading.

Rosslee wanted to understand the role of shared reading in shaping children’s attitudes toward reading and how school leadership can promote and support these practices. She was particularly interested in how these reading interactions influence the educational outcomes and literacy development of young children. Rosslee’s findings revealed that shared reading has a significant positive impact on both children’s and adults’ perceptions, encouraging ongoing engagement in reading activities. The study highlighted the importance of school leadership in promoting shared reading programs, although some parents were unaware of the district’s efforts in this area. The retired teachers emphasized the value of these initiatives but noted gaps in parent awareness of the administration’s involvement in supporting shared reading initiatives.

Rosslee was supported throughout her project by Dr. Rebecca Natow, who helped her refine her research questions and methodology. Rosslee plans to continue her research on shared reading by expanding her study to include multiple cases. She is committed to exploring the impact of reading practices on children’s literacy development and how educational leaders can better support these initiatives.

Cori Sternstein

BA, History, December 2024

MS, Social Studies Education, December 2025 • Hometown: Melville, NY

Project Title:

Newspaper Coverage of Famine in Skibbereen

Advisor: Dr. Alan Singer

Cori Sternstein is nearing the end of her academic career as an undergraduate. She will graduate in the fall of 2024 with her Bachelor of Arts in History and continue on with her Master of Science in Social Studies Education here at Hofstra. Her passion for primary-source research emerged while working as a teaching assistant for Dr. Alan Singer. Inspired by his course on The Great Irish Famine, Sternstein focused her research on analyzing the biases in 19th-century newspapers, particularly those covering the heavily impacted town of Skibbereen in West Cork, Ireland.

She analyzed newspapers from three different countries — Ireland, Britain, and the United States — to understand how each portrayed the Great Famine. Sternstein compared the content and tone of these publications, examining how each country’s political and social context influenced the narratives they presented. Her research involved a close reading of these primary sources, with a particular focus on how the construction and conditions of workhouses were depicted in each country’s press.

Sternstein was driven by a desire to explore the differing perspectives and biases present in historical sources, particularly those surrounding significant events like the Great Famine. By understanding these biases, she aimed to shed light on the varying narratives that shaped public perception at the time and how these narratives reflected each country’s interests and concerns.

Sternstein found that British newspapers portrayed the construction of workhouses as a significant effort to aid the Irish, emphasizing the government’s role in providing shelter and food. In contrast, Irish and American newspapers highlighted the harsh realities of life in these workhouses, noting the overpopulation, disease, and starvation that persisted despite the British efforts. The American newspapers, influenced by the Irish diaspora and their negative views of British governance, often echoed the critical tone of the Irish press.

Her advisor, Dr. Alan Singer, provided her with regular feedback and encouraged her to incorporate photographs into her essays, adding a visual and emotional dimension to her work. Dr. Singer’s guidance was instrumental in shaping her research and enhancing her analytical skills.

Sternstein is applying the insights she gained from this research to further study the Holodomor, the Soviet-induced famine in Ukraine from 1932-1933. After graduating, she plans to pursue a career in education, specifically teaching middle school world history. Sternstein is student teaching and excited about the prospect of sharing her passion for history with her future students.

Jenna Miller

BA, Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, Dual Degree, December 2024

MA, Speech-Language Pathology, Spring 2025 • Hometown: Wantagh, NY

Project Title:

A Study of Lexical-Semantic Control in Bilingual Aphasia

Advisor: Dr. Patrizia Bonaventura

Jenna Miller conducted a case study examining lexical-semantic control in a bilingual individual with aphasia. Lexical-semantic control refers to the ability to choose and use the right words in the right context. Individuals accomplish such by managing how we access and select the meanings of the words we use while speaking and writing. Miller’s research focused on understanding how aphasia impacts the ability to process and retrieve words in both the dominant and non-dominant languages of the participant, a Hispanic male. Aphasia is a language disorder caused by damage to the brain that disrupts a person’s ability to speak, understand speech, read, or write. Ultimately, it makes it difficult for someone to process and use language without affecting their thinking or intelligence. Miller used a survey-based approach, employing tasks adapted from the Bilingual Aphasia Test (BAT) and the Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia (PALPA). These tasks included pictureword matching, one-step commands, picture naming, and distinguishing between meanings. The survey was administered via Zoom over a period of 11 days, and the participant’s responses were recorded and analyzed to assess their lexical-semantic abilities in both languages.

Miller’s interest in aphasia, particularly in bilingual individuals, was driven by her background in speechlanguage-hearing sciences and a minor in Spanish. She worked to better understand how aphasia differentially affects language processing in bilingual speakers and provide insights that could inform therapeutic approaches and language rehabilitation strategies for this population.

Her findings revealed that the participant’s lexical-semantic abilities were better preserved in the dominant language, Spanish, compared to the non-dominant language, English. The participant showed more accurate responses in tasks administered in Spanish, indicating that aphasia had a more pronounced impact on the non-dominant language. These results supported Miller’s hypothesis that lexical-semantic control is differentially affected depending on the language used in the tasks.

Miller was mentored by Dr. Patrizia Bonaventura, who guided her throughout the research process. Dr. Bonaventura’s support was instrumental in helping Miller navigate the complexities of her case study, from survey design to data analysis, and in refining her approach to ensure the rigor and accuracy of her findings.

Miller plans to continue her education in speech-language pathology, with the goal of working in clinical settings that specialize in neurorehabilitation. Her research experience has inspired her to pursue further studies in bilingualism and language disorders, and she is particularly interested in working with bilingual populations in her future clinical practice.

Project Title:

Harnessing Change: How the 2008 and 2012 Obama Presidential Campaigns Pioneered New Media Communication Strategies

Advisor: Dr. Meena Bose

Danny DeCrescenzo conducted thorough research on how the 2008 and 2012 Obama presidential campaigns pioneered new media communication strategies. He explored how Barack Obama’s use of emerging media, such as social media platforms and online content, revolutionized political campaigning and set a new standard for future presidential candidates.

DeCrescenzo also undertook an independent study that resulted in an argumentative research paper. He analyzed a variety of sources, including academic studies on presidential rhetoric, the utilization of emerging media networks during the early 21st century, and content produced by Obama’s campaigns. He focused on the ways in which Obama’s team leveraged platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter to engage voters more effectively than his rivals. DeCrescenzo also considered the broader implications of these strategies on the evolution of political communication.

He was interested in how modern communication tools have reshaped the political landscape. With Obama’s campaigns serving as a pivotal moment in the integration of social media into political strategy, DeCrescenzo sought to assess how these innovations contributed to Obama’s electoral success and what lessons can be drawn for future campaigns. His study also highlighted the challenges of replicating such a strategy in today’s more polarized and algorithm-driven media environment.

DeCrescenzo’s findings revealed that Obama’s campaigns effectively utilized new media to create a significant advantage over his rivals. In 2008, Obama’s social media presence far exceeded that of his opponents, with millions of followers on platforms like Facebook and Twitter. By 2012, Obama’s use of these platforms had become even more sophisticated, allowing him to maintain a direct connection with voters and control his campaign narrative. However, DeCrescenzo concluded that the media landscape has since evolved, making it challenging for future candidates to replicate Obama’s success in the same way. The former president himself acknowledged this difficulty in a recent podcast, noting the complexities of navigating today’s media environment.

DeCrescenzo was thankful for his mentor, Dr. Meena Bose, who provided critical guidance in helping him to navigate the complexities of political communication theory and the analytical aspects of his study. Her mentorship was instrumental in refining his research questions and ensuring the rigor and depth of his analysis, allowing DeCrescenzo to produce a comprehensive and insightful study.

DeCrescenzo plans to continue exploring the intersection of media and politics, with a particular interest in pursuing graduate studies in political science or political communication. His experience with this research project has solidified his passion for understanding the dynamics of political media strategies, and he is eager to apply this knowledge in both academic and professional settings.

BA, Film and Philosophy, Spring 2025 • Hometown: Lincroft, NJ

Project Title:

The Fighting and the Minotaur: The Value of Editing in Raging Bull

Advisor: Dr. Rodney F. Hill

Tristan Latour explored the significance of film editing using Martin Scorsese’s 1980 film Raging Bull as a case study. He focused on understanding how editing not only shapes the narrative structure of a film, but also influences the audience’s emotional and psychological experience. Latour analyzed key scenes from Raging Bull, particularly the boxing sequences, to explore how editing techniques contributed to the film’s storytelling. He examined the use of cuts, slow motion, and sound design to demonstrate how these elements work together to create a visceral and immersive experience for the audience. His approach was heavily analytical, focusing on specific scenes to reveal how the editing serves as a narrative device that enhances character development and conveys deeper thematic messages.

Latour was fascinated with the often overlooked, yet critical role of film editing in the moviemaking process. He strived to shed light on how editing is not just a technical aspect of filmmaking, but is a powerful tool that can alter the audience’s perception and understanding of a story. His research contributes to the appreciation of film editing as an art form that plays a crucial role in cinematic storytelling.

Latour’s findings underscored the importance of editing in Raging Bull as a means of manipulating time, space, and emotion. He concluded that the film’s editing not only conveys the physical and emotional struggles of the protagonist, Jake LaMotta, but also engages the audience on a deeper level, making them feel the intensity and turmoil of LaMotta’s life. Latour highlighted how specific editing techniques, such as the use of slow motion and the timing of cuts, amplify the impact of key scenes, particularly during the boxing matches, where the editing mirrors LaMotta’s psychological state.

Latour was mentored by Dr. Rodney Hill, who provided him with essential resources, including books and films, that inspired and informed his analysis. He also helped Latour understand the existing literature on film editing and encouraged him to develop original insights for his thesis. Dr. Hill’s mentorship was crucial in helping Latour navigate the challenges of his research and refine his analytical approach.

He plans to continue his academic journey by completing a philosophy thesis that explores the overlap between perception and art. Latour sees his research on film editing as foundational to his future studies, particularly in understanding how different forms of media influence human perception. His experience with this project has deepened his interest in the intersection of film and philosophy, and he is eager to explore these themes further in his academic and professional pursuits.

HOFSTRA AT A GLANCE

LOCATION

Hempstead, Long Island, 25 miles east of New York City

Telephone: 516-463-6600

CHARACTER

A private, nonsectarian, coeducational university

PRESIDENT

Susan Poser, JD, PhD

COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS

Academic Health Sciences Center (Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell; Hofstra Northwell School of Nursing and Physician Assistant Studies; School of Health Sciences); Frank G. Zarb School of Business; Fred DeMatteis School of Engineering and Applied Science; Hofstra College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs; School of Humanities, Fine and Performing Arts; School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics); School of Education; Stuart and Nancy Rabinowitz Honors College; The Lawrence Herbert School of Communication; Maurice A. Deane School of Law; Hofstra University Continuing Education

FACULTY

There are 1,281 faculty members, of whom 478 are full-time. Ninety-three percent of full-time faculty hold the highest degree in their fields.

STUDENT BODY

Undergraduate enrollment of 6,224. Total University enrollment, including graduate, School of Law, and School of Medicine, is 10,393. Undergraduate male-female ratio is 47-to-53.

PROGRAM OPTIONS

Bachelor’s degrees are offered in about 175 program options. Graduate degrees, including PhD, EdD, PsyD, AuD, JD, and MD, advanced certificates and professional diplomas, are offered in about 200 program options.

THE HOFSTRA CAMPUS

With 117 buildings and 244 acres, Hofstra is a member of the American Public Gardens Association.

LIBRARIES

The Hofstra libraries contain 600,000+ volumes and provide 24/7 online access to more than 200,000 full-text journals and 800,000 electronic books.

ACCESSIBILITY

Hofstra is 100% program accessible to persons with disabilities.

JANUARY AND SUMMER SESSIONS

Hofstra offers a January session and three summer sessions between May and August.

Nondiscrimination Policy

Hofstra University is committed to extending equal opportunity to all qualified individuals without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, national or ethnic origin, physical or mental disability, marital or veteran status (characteristics collectively referred to as “Protected Characteristic”) in employment and in the conduct and operation of Hofstra University’s educational programs and activities, including admissions, scholarship and loan programs, and athletic and other school-administered programs. This statement of nondiscrimination is in compliance with Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act, the Age Discrimination Act, and other applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to nondiscrimination (“Equal Opportunity Laws”). The Equal Rights and Opportunity Officer is the University’s official responsible for coordinating its overall adherence to Equal Opportunity Laws. Questions or concerns regarding any of these laws, other aspects of Hofstra’s Nondiscrimination Policy, or regarding Title IX as it relates to reports against employees or other nonstudents, should be directed to the Equal Rights and Opportunity Officer, who also serves as the Title IX Coordinator for Employee Matters, at HumanResources@hofstra.edu, 516-463-6859, 205 Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549. Student-related questions or concerns regarding Title IX should be directed to the Title IX Coordinator for Student Issues at StudentTitleIX@ hofstra.edu, 516-463-5841, 127 Wellness & Campus Living Center, Hempstead, NY 11549. For additional contacts and related policies and resources, see hofstra.edu/eoe

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.