The Hofstra
HEMPSTEAD, NY Volume 83 Issue 10
Chronicle
Tuesday
December 5, 2017
Keeping the hofstra Community informed since 1935
Student suffers 12 seizures after marijuana is confiscated
By Samantha Storms ARTS & E N T E RTA I N M E NT ASSISTA N T E D I TO R
Following an incident on Sunday, Oct. 29 in which Public Safety reportedly confiscated a stash of illegal marijuana from a campus residence hall, a Hofstra student licensed with a New York medical marijuana card has suffered 12 seizures to date, including a grand mal seizure that left the student hospitalized. After a report made to Public Safety by another resident on the student’s floor, officers searched his single room and removed the illegal marijuana from the residence hall. The events that followed prompted the student’s family to urge Hofstra admin-
istration to address the lack of policy in place for working with student medical marijuana card holders, an issue that the student says poses a major threat to his education and, most importantly, his health. “I have generalized epilepsy which involves my entire brain, not just one section,” the student explained in an email to The Chronicle. “Apparently I’ve had it for years, and I didn’t know because I always smoked. When I stopped smoking is when I had my [first] grand mal seizure.” According to the New York State Department of Health, only certain forms of marijuana are legal under the New York State Medical Marijuana Program,
including “liquids and oil for vaporization or administration via inhaler as well as capsules to take orally.” However, the law prohibits smoking marijuana, as well as marijuana taken in the form of edibles. The student spoke to The Chronicle on the condition of anonymity to discuss usage of drug paraphernalia. Since October, when his illegal substances were confiscated, the student has had to stash his marijuana with a friend at an offcampus location where he travels on foot during the evening to take his dosages. “I’m supposed to take doses every three hours, but I can’t do that anymore,” the student
said. “I take doses once a day now, and I can only take them at night after walking right through Hempstead.” After the incident, the student met with Associate Director of Public Safety Robert McDonald on Oct. 30, leading to a conversation the student says left him disappointed in the department’s ability to both listen to and communicate with students in order to ensure their health and safety. McDonald has declined to comment, citing restrictions made by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The student claimed that in this meeting, McDonald questioned the student’s use of an illegal form of marijuana, dry
herb, to medicate. The student then explained the complications of the situation – that the dispensary was over an hour away and no transportation from either the university or the state medical marijuana program was being offered. “I explained all this to him – that I need it and that it controls my seizures,” the student said. “He basically didn’t care, wrote me my violation and just sent me away.” Following this meeting, the student had to meet with the Resident Director of Constitution and Vander Poel Hall Samuel Continued on A4
Hofsta Law clinic sues NCPD for immigration policy
By Katie Krahulik NEW S E D I TO R
The Hofstra Law Clinic and the Deportation Defense Clinic set a state precedent on Monday, Nov. 20 after filing a lawsuit against the Nassau County Police Department (NCPD) claiming that their immigration detainment policies are “unlawful.” The clinic’s goal is to cease the efforts of police to honor what the plaintiff is calling illegal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) warrants and detainers. The practice is condoned under federal law and even encouraged under Nassau County Policy 3610, but it contradicts a New York State criminal procedure law which is the basis for the litigation. This is the first lawsuit of its kind in New York and it is gaining major media attention from organizations such as The New York Times, Newsday, News 12, WABC, CBS, Telemundo, 1010 WINS, the New York Law Journal and others. Roni Amit, a fellow at the Deportation Defense Clinic and the head attorney for the plaintiff explained their legal basis for the
ICE detainer committed.” The plaintiff argues as “a request that living in the United States that a local law without legal permission cannot enforcement be defined as a crime in New agency hold an York State, and thus is seeking individual for a declaratory judgement against up to 48 hours Nassau County that its policy is beyond the time unlawful. that they should The litigation is filed on behalf have been of longtime Nassau County released so that resident Jane Doe, an immigrant ICE can assume at risk of unlawful arrest under custody of the Policy 3610. The lawsuit is also individual.” on behalf of a nonprofit organizaUnder the New tion for Long Island immigrants York Crimicalled the Central American RefPhoto Couresty of Andrew Heighington nal Procedure ugee Center (CARACEC). Many Law, the only foreign-born individuals, such as The participants in the litigation include (from left) Kadeem Fearon-Jones, Deborah Kick, Emily Torstveit Ngara, Karn Sharma, and Stefan Krieger. time an officer Doe, a 26-year-old female with may make a a general equivalency diploma law enforcement officials any law suit. “Under New York law, warrantless arrest is if there is who wishes to attend college, independent arrest authority, nor the police must have a judicial “reasonable cause to believe does it provide reasonable cause warrant for an arrest or in the Continued on A3 that a crime is being or has been to believe that a crime is or was absence of a judicial warrant, being committed.” they must have reasonable cause Policy 3610 was enacted in to believe that a crime is being or Nassau County in 2007, and has been committed in order to allows for law enforcement to make an arrest,” Amit said. “Dearrest foreign-born individutaining someone on the basis of als without reasonable cause or an ICE warrant or detainer does a judicial warrant. The policy not meet these criteria. An ICE By Michael Ortiz allows for the use of an ICE warwarrant is not a judicial warrant. rant which accompanies an ICE It is issued by and for federal A12 detainer. The plaintiff defines an officials. It does not give local
Editor’s Send-off: Hofstra’s Chronic Problem