HEMPSTEAD, NY VOL. 80 Issue 19
The Hofstra
Chronicle
Tuesday March 31, 2015
KEEPING THE HOFSTRA COMMUNITY INFORMED SINCE 1935
Twelfth presidential conference talks G.W. Bush By Ehlayna Napolitano NEWS EDITOR
In the weeks leading up to the 12th Presidential Conference, one of the most-talked about details of the George W. Bush Conference was the absence of the man himself. For three days last week, speakers from across the country converged on Hofstra’s campus to provide insight and discussion about the eight years of the Bush presidency. Guests included former members of Bush’s administration, as well as professors and authors offering expert perspectives. Topics ranged from examinations of Bush’s “compassionate conservatism” to the leadership of the First Lady, Laura Bush. Speakers’ views on the Bush presidency also varied, with some granting the former president praise and sympathy, while others accused him of war crimes and gross injustices. Among the critics was Dr. Carolyn Eisenberg, a history professor at Hofstra and member of the conference committee. She expressed frustration with the
Bush administration for a lack of cooperation with the committee in planning the event. “One problem for conference planners was in order to get these officials to attend, some needed assurance that they would not face direct challenge,” Eisenberg said, noting that previous presidents and administrations had had “no problem” with open discussion. “However, that unwillingness was at odds with University norms. A free exchange of ideas is at the heart of our mission. And my own view was that if Bush officials were unwilling to engage in free discussion, they should not be welcomed,” Eisenberg said. But conference director Dr. Meena Bose, who is a political science professor at Hofstra, said that there was cooperation between the Bush administration and the planning committee. Further, Bose, who is also the director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, stated that the “comprehensive” process in planning the conference ultimately accomplished the
committee’s goal of examining the “consequential” presidency of George W. Bush. Although she stated that the committee had hoped that former President Bush himself would attend the conference, he was ultimately unable to do so. She said, however, that the array of experts, journalists and administration officials who did attend provided much insight into the historical perspective of the presidency and how and when decisions were made. “You really get a fuller portrait of a presidency,” Bose said. Students were also involved in the conference. Some served as ambassadors who accompanied guests on campus, and others participated in a student-led panel on Tuesday. Denisse Girón, a junior history and sociology major, was a part of the event that discussed the Afghanistan War. Girón was not initially planning on being involved in the event at all. “Although no presidency goes without fault, I didn’t like the
Continued on A2
Che Sullivan/The Chronicle Porter J. Goss, the former director of the Central Intelligence Agency and former congressman, addressed an audience in the Student Center Theater on Tuesday.
SGA continues to hold off on club space appropriations By Shannon Alomar STAFF WRITER
Almost a week after student clubs were told to submit their Student Government Association (SGA) budgets for the fall 2015 semester, club leaders have still been left in the dark about office spaces. Up until this school year, student clubs were expected to reapply for office spaces every four years.That reapplication process is now held every two years. This semester, the application
was due on February 25 and the allocation of office spaces was supposed to be announced on March 5. But, due to an unexpected snow day, SGA’s club relations chair Alexandra Engelson sent out an email saying the date would be postponed to March 12. Furthering the delay, Engelson sent out an email on March 12 stating: “The University is evaluating space in the Student Center to see how it can best be utilized. Your Student Government Association is committed to representing club interests in these discussions.
Therefore, we have opted to postpone the finalization of office space allocations by a few weeks. Thank you for your patience. We welcome your feedback and questions.” When the last allocations for office spaces were given, in 2012, several clubs either lost their office space or were consolidated. Overall, the outcome left several leaders unhappy. The current conflict surrounding the issue is the extended wait for clubs to find out whether or not they will be granted office space for the next two academic years.
Sarah Young, director of the Office of Student Leadership and Activities (OSLA) said the allocations are delayed due to an evaluation of space. “The club space allocations have been postponed because the Dean of Students [Office], along with the Office of Student Leadership and Activities is reviewing space usage in the Student Center and will be making recommendations to the vice president of Student Affairs,” Young said. These departments are reportedly working on identifying
as many club spaces as possible to house more student-run organizations. The factors that determine club space allocation will still be dictated by SGA. SGA representatives did not make themselves available for comment at the time of publication. With spring break approaching, student leaders are anxious about the probable outcomes of their office spaces and the lack of
Continued on A5