The Hofstra
HEMPSTEAD, NY Volume 84 Issue 6
Chronicle
Tuesday
October 30, 2018
Keeping the Hofstra community informed since 1935
Department of Health and Human Services threatens trans rights By Daniel Nguyen O P-ED ED ITO R
Daniel Nguyen / The Hofstra Chronicle A multitude of student clubs united on campus for an emergency meeting to discuss the safety of the transgender community in the wake of the recent memo leak in The New York Times.
Following the recently leaked trans memo, a document obtained by The New York Times detailing the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) efforts to establish a legal definition of sex that would curtail a series of Obama-era decisions that loosened the national conception of gender, a coalition of student clubs on campus held an emergency meeting on Tuesday, Oct. 23. The event, entitled “How the Trump Administration Will Legislate Transgender Americans
Out of Existence – Digesting the Horrifying Policy Proposal that Would Eliminate Transgender Rights in the United States of America,” packed the Plaza Middle and West Rooms. The event gathered numerous campus clubs in support of transgender rights and featured a presentation on the memo and a discussion on ways people can help support the safety of transgender people in the wake of the leak. Co-sponsored by Hofstra’s Queer Trans People of Color Coalition (QTPOCC), The Gender Identity Federation (TGIF), The Pride Network, Campus Feminist Collective, Student
Advocates for Safer Sex, Young Democratic Socialists of Hofstra and the Democrats of Hofstra University, the event broke down a collaboratively club-created 16page document on the memo. Ja’Loni Owens, a senior public policy and journalism student, co-hosted the event as president of QTPOCC.“We need to show up for trans folx right now. There are such devastating consequences of writing a class of people out of existence,” Owens said. “The law will say trans folx cannot Continued On A4
Day of Dialogue: A call for immigration policy reform By Jocelin Montes SPEC IAL TO T H E C H R O NI CL E
The Center for Civic Engagement hosted a panel of renowned professionals and engaged students to break down the complex and multifaceted issue of immigration and question the ethics behind recent United States policies as part of Hofstra’s annual Day of Dialogue, on Wednesday, Oct. 24, “Do we have the capacity to weigh in, seriously, all the immigration debates and to develop complex solutions that would address multiple conflicting values?” asked Rosanna Perotti, professor of political science, to an audience filled with students, faculty and staff. “The immigration challenges that face the United States are very complex and will require us to weigh in values that are widely shared and sometimes conflicting,” Perotti added. Amy Baehr, professor of philosophy at Hofstra; Rev.
Ana Levy-Lyons, senior minister at First Unitarian Church in Brooklyn Heights; Paula Chirinos, a junior public relations major; and Kimberly Chin, deputy director of The Children’s Defense Fund of New York shared insight on the values and steps they believe should be taken by Congress in order to construct stronger immigration policies. Baehr addressed nine pluralist approaches that could benefit immigration reforms and noted that these are society’s most basic moral ideals. “The values that I discuss are these: human rights, desert, safety, just solutions, economic prosperity, procedural fairness, humanitarianism, global distributive justice and the rectification of our past wrongs,” Baehr said. On April 6, the current administration declared an end to a practice often know as “catch and release.” On the same day, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reported that Attorney General Jeff Sessions
ordered all Southern border security to “adopt immediately a zero-tolerance policy,” meaning that all entry would be referred to as criminal activity. “The zero-tolerance policy goes against our constitutional beliefs. We believe in due process, in no cruel or unusual punishment,” said Arielle Ruiz, a freshman journalism major. Shortly after the reports, DHS determined that the policy would only cover “alien adults” entering the United States, “because minor children cannot be held in criminal custody with an adult, alien adults would have to be separated from accompanying minor children ...” Ruiz added, “People are literally being taken away from their children and these are not children who speak Spanish. Many of them are indigenous, who speak languages that do not exist on paper.” “Separating families at the border because you can is immoral. Taking away public benefits from immigrants and American-born citizen children
is immoral,” Chin said. Chin mentioned the work and research that The Children’s Defense Fund contributes to child advocacy. Levy-Lyons spoke on the story of immigration, its connection to the Hebrew Bible and its relations to current immigration issues. “The Hebrew people become the archetypal strangers throughout this [immigration] story and the rest of the Torah is a reaction, a response to that experience of being immigrants, being oppressed and being strangers in foreign land.” Levy-Lyons noted the current administration rejects the entire framework of the Biblical story and that it goes against the idea of welcoming, loving and creating a just world for the stranger. “The current political climate has given me no choice but to come out and share my experience,” said Chirinos, who shared her experience as a Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipient with the audience.
Chirinos who moved to the United States when she was three years old, said that her journey with DACA began in the sixth grade. As a result, she was granted a social security number, a workers permit, driver’s license and temporary protection. Like many recipients, Chirinos’ only home, for years, has been the United States. “I am very grateful that students like me were giving some sort of protection by the national government with the DACA program, but currently, I am in a place where I don’t know what will happen to me next year, or the next 10 years,” Chirinos said. “I think [immigration] has its benefits and is detrimental on different aspects, it’s not the same for everyone, everyone has different experiences with it,” said Jennifer Maldonado, a freshman sociology major. “But for the most part, immigration has been proven to be economically, socially and culturally beneficial to this country.”
Check out our live election coverage on Tuesday, Nov. 6, from the Herbert School