Volume 11, Issue 6
11.19.2015 A PUBLICATION BY HOLDERNESS STUDENTS FOR THE HOLDERNESS COMMUNITY
Why We Should Talk About St.Paul’s: Part II Chae Hahn’17
H
e was a respected senior at St.Paul’s School. He was a student leader, the captain of the varsity soccer team, and one of the most popular boys on campus. His teachers considered him a “good kid.” Having been accepted to Harvard University on full scholarship, he had a promising future. However, when he was charged for sexually assaulting a 15-year old freshman in May 2014, his life completely changed. Two weeks ago, he was sentenced to one year in jail and five years of probation. Now he is registered for life as a sexual offender. Interestingly, he was acquitted of the most serious charge, “aggravated felonious sexual assault,” meaning that the judge recognized that the sexual encounters between him and the freshman girl did not lack consent. Instead, what led to his sentence were charges associated
with the process of his seducing an underage girl, and none of them were related to consent. This September, I wrote an article in the Picador about how Holderness needs to talk about the St.Paul’s case and raise awareness of problematic gender cultures. I mentioned that our school, being an independent boarding school in New Hampshire itself, is so similar to St.Paul’s, and we should therefore take the case into account and continue to maintain a respectful community. While reading about the verdict, I realized that the case is of greater significance than I had previously thought. It turns out that the verdict made the case even more relevant to our lives. This time, the phrase “our lives” does not necessarily point to our lives as boarding school students, but refers to our lives as seemingly simpleminded teenagers in modern society.
For one thing, Owen Labrie’s sentence was greatly affected by his inappropriate use of online communication. The fact that he faced charges like “using computer services to seduce a child under sixteen” suggests that, by law, the mere process of trying to solicit sex from a person under 16 is problematic (consent is disregarded in this case). Not only did his use of computer services lead to his sentence, it also became crucial articles of evidence that were used against him during the case. When evidence that Owen Labrie texted his friends that he could “feign intimacy with girls, stab them in the back, and throw ‘em in the dumpster” was revealed, his claim of innocence lost validity and the media, of course, took notes. Whether or not anyone on our campus is obnoxious enough to talk in such a degrading way is not pertinent. This St. Paul’s Continued Page 4
Vice President Speaks Out on Leadership Maggie Barton ‘16
R
egardless of my own feelings on the leadership block, I think that a flaw in it is not necessarily the use of the time, but how it is viewed by the school community. When students and teachers asked why forty-five minutes of our “free time” a week is now given over to leadership, the general response was that the school has decided
to make the development of leadership an even bigger focus in our community, and, as Mr. Ford was quoted in AJ’s article saying, “we need to set aside time to do that.” We have spent time in assembly talking about the infamous three C’s and how the school’s new strategic and master plans include the lofty goal of “redefining leadership.” I think that over the past few weeks, the leadership block has been a time when leadership was redefined AT us.
The Picador: Volume 11, Issue 6
Personally, I think we need to shift the focus from defining it, to implementing it. I believe that the goal of “redefining leadership” is inherently misleading. We can define and redefine all day long and never actually act like leaders. I think that Holderness School does a great job of thrusting kids into situations where their leadership skills Leadership Continued Page 4
1