BCS Assist Hope Street Centre Platform event Prof Trevor Wood Harper on Information Management

Page 1

Informa(on Management: Principles or Perspec(ves? Trevor Wood-­‐Harper Innova/on, Management & Policy MBS University of Manchester 28.2.12


Sco8sh Government’s Informa(on Management Principles (2008) •  Information is a Corporate Resource •  Personal Responsibility •  Information Accessibility •  Keeping Records of What We Do •  Ensuring Information is Accurate and Fit for Purpose •  Compliance with Statutory and Regulatory Requirements


Sense-­‐Making in Organiza(ons (Weick (1995): Relevance to Informa(on Management •  Real-­‐world problems do not present themselves to prac//oners as given •  They must be constructed, assembled, from problema/c situa/ons –  puzzling, ambiguous, make no sense •  Prac//oners recognise problem se*ng as a necessary condi/on for technical problem solving •  People select relevant ‘things’, set boundaries, say what’s wrong – subjec/ve process •  Manager’s task: –  genera/ng clear formula/on of problem situa/on –  Crea/ng a structure from disorder –  Giving a linguis/c formula/on to shared feelings and shared circumstances •  A leader?: –  shows a different way of ‘seeing’ –  Tells it as it ‘might be’


The Nature of Difficul(es in Informa(on Management

(Vidgen, Avison, Wood & Wood-Harper 2003)


‘Harder’ Methods applied to Unbounded Problem Situa(ons •  Systems Engineering •  Informa/on Engineering •  Systems Analysis •  SSADM •  Jackson Systems Method •  Opera/ons Research •  Database Design


The Nature of Messes in Informa(on Management

(Vidgen, Avison, Wood & Wood-Harper 2003)


‘SoSer’ Methods applied to Unbounded Problem Situa(ons •  SWOT analysis •  Strategic Choice Approach •  Future Workshops •  Scenario Approach •  Strategic Op/on Development and Analysis (SODA) •  So\ Systems Methodology (SSM)

(Sorensen and Vidal 2003)


Differences Between Hard & SoS

Approaches

SOFT

HARD

Clear goals and objec(ves Quan(fiable data Control mechanisms are clear Power is clear, known to work Unitary view of organiza(on Evolved first to meet needs of modern engineering and industrial systems •  Aims to solve problems •  Change Agent detached from situa(on •  •  •  •  •  •

•  •  •  •  •  •  •  •

Organiza(ons as social en((es Goals need nego(a(on Different perspec(ves-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐> Power diffuse and frequently unknown Consensus view/conflict view of organiza(on Evolved later (1960s) in response to difficul(es in using hard approaches Aims to appreciate and improve problems Change Agent part of the situa(on

(Flynn 2011)


The Learning Cycle (Kolb)


Mul(ple Perspec(ve Thinking

(NCC 2006)


Multiple Perspective 
 Types Perspective

Technical (T)

Organizational (O )

Personal (P)

World view

Science-technology

Social entity: small to large, informal to formal

Individuation, the self

Goal

Problem solving, product

Action, stability, process

Power, influence, prestige

Mode of Inquiry

Sense-data, modeling, analysis

Consensual and adversary

Intuition, learning, experience

Ethical basis

Logic, rationality

Abstract concepts of justice fairness

Individual values/morality

Planning Horizon

Far

Intermediate

Short, with exception

Other characteristics

Looks for cause and effect Relationship Problem simplified, idealized

Agenda (problem of the moment) Problem delegated and factored Political sensitivity, loyalties

Challenge and response

Need for validation, replicability Claim of objectivity Optimization (seek best solution) Quantification Trade-offs Use of averages, probabilities

Reasonableness Satisficing (first acceptable solution) Incremental change Standard operating procedures Compromise and bargaining

Filter out inconsistent images

Make use of uncertainties Uncertainties noted Communications

Technical report, briefing

Hierarchy of individual needs

Need for beliefs Cope only with a few alternatives Fear of change Leaders and followers Creativity and vision by the few Need for certainty

Language differs for insiders, public

Personality important

(Mitroff & Linstone 1996)


The Multiple Perspective Framework for Generating a Web IS Development Methodology – WISDM/Multiview Multiple perspectives: • Technical (T) • Organizational (O) • Personal (P)

CHANGE AGENTS Would-be developers of an information system

IS DEVELOPMENT METHODS ANALYSIS

History

SOCIO

WISDM - Web IS Development Methodology (emergent)

Information Analysis

Value creation

Requirements specification

Work Design

Technical Design

User satisfaction

HCI User interface

TECHNICAL

Organizational Analysis

Software model

DESIGN

SITUATION

(Vidgen, Avison, Wood & Wood-Harper 2003)


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.