HSS What’s the Diagnosis Case 169

Page 1

What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

1


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

2


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

3


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

4


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

5


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

6


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

7


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

8


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

9


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

10


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

11


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

12


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

13


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

14


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

15


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

16


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

17


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

18


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

19


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

20


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

21


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

22


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

23


Findings The radiographs (particularly in retrospect) demonstrate stranding of the fat in keeping with edema of the subcutaneous fat subsequently seen on the MRI images. The MRI demonstrates prominent edema (as shown by high signal on the PD and IR pulse sequences) of multiple muscle groups inclusive of the deltoid, triceps, biceps, and extending into the flexor and extensor musculature of the forearm.

What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

24


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

25


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

26


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

27


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

28


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

29


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

30


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

31


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

32


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

33


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

34


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

35


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

36


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

37


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

38


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

39


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

40


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

41


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

42


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

43


Diagnosis: Rhabdomyolysis Rhabdomyolysis is the breakdown of striated muscle which can be seen related to trauma, prolonged immobilization, or as in this case overuse. The breakdown products of muscle can lead to cardiac, hepatic, and especially renal complications. The imaging findings of rhabdomyolysis have some overlap with delayed onset muscle soreness or DOMS. Both will have edema in muscle or muscle groups and may have edema of the subcutaneous soft tissue. The findings of DOMS are not as pronounced but overlap is certainly present. Often the clinical scenario helps distinguish the degree of pathology with rhabdomyolysis presenting rapidly as compared to a 24-48 hour delay in DOMS and with the pain of rhabdomyolysis persisting at rest while the pain of DOMS frequently mitigated by rest. The patient in this situation was treated with aggressive IV hydration and rest and thankfully had no other complications.

What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

44


References Imaging Findings in the Setting of Rhabdomyolysis. Emily Neal, Steve Burky, MD. Applied Radiology Importance of MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of rhabdomyolysis. Mónica Ballesta Moratalla, Petra Braun, Guillermina Montoliu Fornas. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Feb;65(2):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.03.033. Epub 2007 May 4.

What’s the Diagnosis – Case 169

45


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.