2017reportglobalcitizenstribunaltoputmonsantoontrial by Super Industrial Online

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Global Citizens Tribunal to Put Monsanto on Trial PARIS, France, – Global food, farming and environmental justice groups are joining forces to put biotech crop giant Monsanto on trial for ecocide and crimes against nature and humanity at the International People’s Court in The Hague.

Genetically modified corn, Nabraska (Photo by Rebecca Winters)

At a press conference held in conjunction with COP21, the United Nations climate change conference now underway in Paris, the groups announced their intention to try the publicly-traded U.S.-based transnational corporation. The trial is scheduled for next year on World Food Day, October 16, 2016. It will be held not at the International Court of Justice, but at the the International People’s Court, which operates outside the mechanisms of government and formal institutions like the United Nations.

Related articles and information Latest reports and educational tutorials about green business News and key insights for Alternative financing in US and Mexico Press releases and reports about food processing Reports and resources related to Packaging Machinery for foods

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Its authority comes from the voices of the victims, as well as that of civil society, both national and international. “The time is long overdue for a global citizens’ tribunal to put Monsanto on trial for crimes against humanity and the environment,” said Ronnie Cummins, international director of the U.S.-based Organic Consumers Association and Via Organica, based in Mexico, and a member of the Regeneration International Steering Committee. “We are in Paris this month to address the most serious threat that humans have ever faced in our 100-200,000 year evolution – global warming and climate disruption, said Cummins. “Why is there so much carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere and not enough carbon organic matter in the soil?” he asked. Answering his own question, Cummins laid blame on, “Corporate agribusiness, industrial forestry, the garbage and sewage industry and agricultural biotechnology” who have “literally killed the climate-stabilizing, carbon-sink capacity of the Earth’s living soil.”

March Against Monsanto, San Francisco, California, May 2015 (Photo by Peg Hunter)

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

The case will be brought to The Hague by Organic Consumers Association, IFOAM International Organics, Navdanya, Regeneration International and Millions Against Monsanto, joined by dozens of global food, farming and environmental justice groups. Vandana Shiva, physicist, author, activist and founder of Navdanya, and member of the Regeneration International, RI, Steering Committee said, “Monsanto has pushed GMOs in order to collect royalties from poor farmers, trapping them in unpayable debt, and pushing them to suicide.” “Monsanto promotes an agro-industrial model that contributes at least 50 percent of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions,” said Shiva. “Monsanto is also largely responsible for the depletion of soil and water resources, species extinction and declining biodiversity, and the displacement of millions of small farmers worldwide.” Since the beginning of the 20th century, Monsanto has developed a steady stream of highly toxic products which have permanently damaged the environment and caused illness or death for thousands of people. These products include: • PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), one of the 12 chemicals governed by the the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, a global treaty to protect human health and the environment from chemicals that remain intact in the environment for long periods, become widely distributed geographically, accumulate in the fatty tissue of humans and wildlife, and have harmful impacts on human health or on the environment. • 2,4,5 T (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid), a dioxin-containing component of the defoliant Agent Orange, which was used by the U.S. Army during the Vietnam War and continues to cause birth defects and cancer; • Lasso, an herbicide that is now banned in Europe; • RoundUp, the most widely used herbicide in the world. This herbicide, designated a probable human carcinogen by the World Health Organization, is used in combination with genetically modified RoundUp Ready seeds in large-scale monocultures of soybeans, maize and rapeseed for animal feed and biofuels.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup (Screengrab fromvideo courtesy Monsanto)

“Monsanto is able to ignore the human and environmental damage caused by its products, and maintain its devastating activities through a strategy of systemic concealment: by lobbying regulatory agencies and governments, by resorting to lying and corruption, by financing fraudulent scientific studies, by pressuring independent scientists, and by manipulating the press and media,” said Andre Leu, president of IFOAM and a member of the RI Steering Committee. “Monsanto’s history reads like a text-book case of impunity, benefiting transnational corporations and their executives, whose activities contribute to climate and biosphere crises and threaten the safety of the planet,” said Leu. For its part, Monsanto portrays itself as a company that cares about the climate. On the agriculture thematic day at the COP21 meeting in Paris, December 1, Monsanto and other food and agriculture giants outlined their plans to make more food available for a growing population while reducing agriculture’s greenhouse gas footprint. Monsanto executives, together with those of PepsiCo, Olam and Kellogg Company, chaired a working group on Climate Smart Agriculture. They declared that by 2030 they are aiming to make 50 percent

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

more food available and strengthen the resilience of farming communities whilst reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent. “Agriculture and farmers are uniquely positioned to make a real difference in driving climate change solutions,” said Hugh Grant, Monsanto’s chairman and chief executive. “Through advanced technologies and better farming practices, like reduced tillage, farmers around the world have made great strides to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reduce overall resource use,” said Grant. “Working together, the global agricultural community has the opportunity to leverage its resources to mitigate the effects of climate change while still meeting the food needs of our growing planet.” Climate Smart Agriculture has the support of organizations such as the World Bank, the United Nations and the UN Food and Agriculture Organization in addition to national government aid and development agencies. Monsanto has never lost a case in court, and has successfully sued farmers who reused the company’s proprietary genetically modified seeds without paying royalties, even in cases where organic farmers had sued Monsanto for the inadvertent cross-pollination of their organic crops with GMO seeds. Monsanto filed 144 patent-infringement lawsuits against farmers between 1997 and April 2010, and won judgments against all farmers. Earlier this year, the company pledged in a U.S. court that it would not press charges against farmers if its biotech crops accidentally mix in with organic crops. Nevertheless, on world Food Day 2016, an international tribunal of lawyers and judges will assess the potential criminal liability of Monsanto for damages inflicted on human health and the environment, relying on the “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights” adopted by the United Nations in 2011. The tribunal will also rely on the Rome Statute that created the International Criminal Court in The Hague in 2002. This court has determined that prosecuting ecocide as a criminal offense is the only way to guarantee the rights of humans to a healthy environment and the right of nature to be protected.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

AccuWeb, Inc.

Admiral Packaging, Inc.

AEP Industries

www.accuweb.com

PO Box 7816,Madison, WI 53707

www.admiralpkg.com

10 Admiral Street, Providence, RI 02908

www.aepinc.com

95 Chestnut Ridge Road Montvale, NJ 07645

32 calle, 7-51, Z-11, Las Charcas, Guatemala.

AGENCIA MALDONADO

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

AGRINOVA

AGRITRADE DE HONDURAS S.A.

AGROBIOTEK

www.agrinova.com.gt.

Desvío residencial Monte María, Villanueva, Cortés, Honduras. Teléfonos: (504) 2670-2220/29. En S.P.S. 27 calle frente a gasolinera UNO antes de la Central de Abastos

www.agri-trade.net.

Entrada principal de Comayagua, 1,300 metros al sur, frente a EXCOSA. Comayagua, Comayagua.

www.agrobiotek.com.

Edificio Santa Bárbara, No. 726, Tegucigalpa, Honduras

AGROPECUARIA EL ÉXITO

5ª Avenida, entre 8 y 9 calle Suroeste, Barrio Lempira, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

ALFA COMERCIAL

Final del Boulevard Morazán, atrás de Plaza Tico, edificio color negro. Tegucigalpa, Francisco Morazán.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

www.algiersimpresores.com.

21 Calle Poniente # 223, entre 1ª y 3ª Avenida Norte, San Salvador, El Salvador.

www.algiersimpresores.com.

21 Calle Poniente # 223, entre 1ª y 3ª Avenida Norte, San Salvador, El Salvador.

www.alliancebarrierfilms.com

1842 E. Waller Drive PO Box 922,Washington, IN 47501

www.almijar.com.

Barrio Lempira, 9 calle, entre 6ª y 7ª Avenidas S.O. Edificio Almíjar, San Pedro Sula.

ALTAGRO

5ª Avenida, 7 y 8 calle Suroeste, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

Amcor Flexibles

www.amcor.com

1919 S. Butterfield Road Mundelein, IL 60060

www.americaninks.com

3400 North 3400 North Hutchinson Pine Hutchinson Pine Bluff, AR 71602 Bluff, AR 71602

http://www.ampkcorp.com/

15135 E. Monument Court,Scottsdal e, AZ 85262

www.ampaconline.com

12025 Tricon 12025 Tricon Road,Cincinnati, Road,Cincinnati, OH 45246 OH 45246

ALGIER´S IMPRESIONES S.A. DE C.V.

ALGIER´S IMPRESORES S.A. DE C.V.

Alliance Barrier Films

ALMÍJAR

American Inks and Coatings American Packaging Corporation

Ampac

15135 E. Monument Court,Scottsdal e, AZ 85262

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Ampacet Corporation

www.ampacet.com

660 White Plains 660 White Plains Road Tarrytown, Road Tarrytown, NY 10591 NY 10591

ARMER PLASTIC

9 Calle, 8 Z-1, Guatemala, Guatemala.

Ashland Performance Materials

www.ashland.com

5200 Blazer 5200 Blazer Parkway,Dublin, Parkway,Dublin, OH 43017 OH 43017

http://www.autobag.com/

10175 Philipp 10175 Philipp Parkway,Streets Parkway,Streets boro, OH 44241 boro, OH 44241

Automated Packaging Systems

9 Calle, 8 Z-1, Guatemala, Guatemala.

Aypek Packaging http://www.lifepacksolution.com/ B. EQUIPOS EN EL SALVADOR

Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

B. ETIQUETAS EN EL SALVADOR

Av. Las Rosas L. 123 “Jardines de San Lucas IV” San Lucas Sac.

B&W MEGTEC

830 Prosper Street,De Pere, WI 54115-5030

BAGSA REALPLASTIC

www.grupofiama.com.

4ª Avenida 0-85, Z-2, Mixco, Ciudad Cotio Guatemala, Guatemala.

www.bambergerpolymers.com

2 Jericho Plaza,Suite 109,Jericho, NY 11753

http://www.brcproducts.com/

1711 N Delilah St, Corona, CA 92879, United States

www.basf.us/dpsolutions

11501 Steele Creek Road Charlotte, NC 28273

Bamberger Polymers, Inc.

Band-it Rubber Company

BASF Corporation

www.flexaprint.com.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

www.beaconconverters.com

PO Box 8208,Saddle Brook, NJ 07663-8208

www.belmark.com

PO Box PO Box 5310,DePere, WI 5310,DePere, WI 54115 54115

www.bemaprint.com

744 N. Oaklawn Avenue Elmhurst, IL 60126

Bemis Company, Inc. www.bemis.com

PO Box 669,One Neenah Center 4th floor,Neenah, WI 54957-0669

Berry Plastics Corporation

www.berryplastics.com

39W259 Johnsway Lane,Campton Hills, IL 60175

www.bjkflexiblepackaging.com

PO Box 1357,945 South 15th Street Louisville, KY 40201

www.bobst.com

146 Harrison Avenue, Roseland, NJ 07068

BOLIK

www.grupok66.com.

Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.

Borton & Sons, Inc.

http://www.bortonfruit.com/ 11320 W. Watertown Plank Road,Wauwatos a, WI 53226

11320 W. Watertown Plank Road,Wauwatos a, WI 53226

Beacon Converters, Inc.

Belmark, Inc.

Bema, Incorporated

BJK Flexible Packaging

Bobst North America Inc.

Bostik, Inc.

www.Bostik-US.com

PO Box 8208,Saddle Brook, NJ 07663-8208

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Bryce Corporation

www.brycecorp.com

Bunzl Ag Group

http://www.cool-pak.com/

4505 Old 4505 Old Lamar,Memphis, Lamar,Memphis, TN 38118 TN 38118

15 Grumbacher Road,York, PA 17406

CEGSA (CAJAS Y EMPAQUES DE GUATEMALA, S.A.)

31 Calle 25-83, Zona 12, Ciudad de Guatemala, 01012, Guatemala, Guatemala.

cei (Coating Excellence International)

www.coatingexcellence.com

957 Broadway,Wrigh tstown, WI 54180

www.celanese.com

222 W. Las Colinas Boulevard Suite 900N,Irving, TX 75039

CELPAC S.A. DE C.V.

Boulevard del Ejército Nacional, Km 7 ½ Soyapango, San Salvador, El

CELPLAST (AGENCIAS ABBOTT)

Del Perimercado 175 metros al norte, mano izquierda, edificio blanco con azul, AGENCIAS ABBOTT, Costa Rica.

67 Commander Boulevard Unit 4,Toronto,

C-P Flexible Packaging

www.cpflexpack.com

Calbee North America

http://harvestsnaps.com/

Celanese

www.agencias-abbott.com.

Celplast Metallized Products Limited www.celplast.com Related articles and information Latest reports and educational tutorials about green business News and key insights for Alternative financing in US and Mexico Press releases and reports about food processing Reports and resources related to Packaging Machinery for foods

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Ontario M1S 3M7 Canada

www.cemsa.com.gt.

Diagonal 19, Avenida Petapa, 7635 Zona 21, Guatemala, Guatemala.

CEMSA (CAJAS Y EMPAQUES DE GUATEMALA S.A.) www.cemsa.com.gt.

31 Calle, 25-83, Zona 12, Ciudad de Guatemala, 01012, Guatemala.

Charter NEX Films

www.charternex.com

1901 Winter 1901 Winter Street,Superior, Street,Superior, WI 54880 WI 54880

Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP

www.cpchem.com

10001 Six Pine Drive,The Woodlands, TX 77380

CKF

http://www.ckfinc.com/

www.cldgraphics.com

1101 W. Second Street Oconomowoc, WI 53066

http://www.clearlam.com/

1950 Pratt Boulevard,Elk Grove Village, IL 60007

www.cloeren.com

401 16th Street,Orange, TX 77630

COAPIHL

Calle 21 de agosto, frente a antena del Centro Radial. Siguatepeque, Comayagua, Honduras.

Coim USA Inc.

86 Mantua Grove Road

CEMSA

CL&D Graphics

Clear Lam Packaging, Inc. Cloeren Incorporated

www.coimgroup.com

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

West Deptford, NJ 08066

COLORPRINT

Edificio Cantero, Edificio Cantero, el Centro de el Centro de Tegucigalpa. Tegucigalpa.

COMERCIAL PAOLA S.A.

www.comercialpaola.com.

1 ½ cuadra arriba de Shell Ciudad Jardín S-42,

www.comexigroup.com

6135 Park South Drive Suite 510,Charlotte, NC 28210

www.cflex.com

1111 Northpoint Boulevard, Blythewood, SC 29016

COPRODE

Barrio Medina, 13 calle, 8ª avenida, esquina opuesta al Asilo de Ancianos. San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

COSQUISA

Plaza Ares, salida a La Lima, Primera Calle, oficina Colonia Aurora, 7 calle, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

COVERIS™

www.coveris.com

PO Box PO Box 5687,Spartanbur 5687,Spartanbur g, SC 29304 g, SC 29304

CTI Industries Corporation

www.ctiindustries.com

22160 N. Pepper 22160 N. Pepper Road Lake Road Lake

Comexi Group

Constantia Flexibles LLC

Conwed Global Netting Solutions http://www.conwedplastics.com/en/

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Barrington, IL 60010

D. EQUIPOS EN NICARAGUA

12 Avenida sur # 132, San Salvador, El Salvador.

Davis-Standard, LLC

1 Extusion 1 Extusion Drive,Pawcatuck Drive,Pawcatuck , CT 06379 , CT 06379

www.davis-standard.com

Decade Products LLC http://www.decadeproducts.com/

www.delcampo.hn.

Avenida Los Próceres, contiguo al Diario El Heraldo; No. 3301, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

www.diasaonline.com.

Calle Antigua a Nejapa, Polígono # 8, Lote # 1, Apopa, San Salvador, El Salvador.

DIMASA UNIVERSAL

Anillo Periférico, 4-15, Zona 2, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.

DIMOGRAFIC

Entre 6ª y 8ª Avenida, 11 Calle, edificio # 731, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

DIPSA (CARVAJAL EMPAQUE)

Urbanización Industrial La Laguna, Calle Circunvalación No. 9-E, Antiguo

DEL CAMPO SOLUCIONES AGRÍCOLAS

DIASA

www.dipsa.com.sv

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Cuscatlán, El Salvador.

Distinct Packabilities, LLC www.distinctpack.com

100 Frank E. Simon Avenue Shepherdsville, KY 40165

DISTRIBUIDORA DEL CARIBE

Oficinas centrales y sala de ventas, 1ª Avenida, Calle 34-39, Zona 11, Colonia Toledo. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.

DISTRIBUIDORA MAYAB

8ª avenida, 4 y 5 calle, S.O. Barrio El Benque. Apartado Postal 397, San Pedro Sula, Cortés, Honduras.

DROGUERÍA HERMEL

www.hermel.com.sv.

Calle Sierra Madre No. 20, Residencial Montebello, San Salvador, El Salvador.

DuPont

http://www.dupont.com/ Chestnut Run Plaza,730,974 Centre Road,PO Box 2915

Chestnut Run Plaza,730,974 Centre Road,PO Box 2915

Boulevard del Norte contiguo a Supermercado Colonial # 2, Río

Display Pack

https://www.displaypack.com/

www.distcaribe.com.

DuPont Company www.dupont.com/packaging Dupont Teijin Films

http://dupontteijinfilms.com/

DUWEST Related articles and information Latest reports and educational tutorials about green business News and key insights for Alternative financing in US and Mexico Press releases and reports about food processing Reports and resources related to Packaging Machinery for foods

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Blanco, San Pedro Sula, Honduras. Dynaplast

http://www.groupeguillin.fr/

Eagle Cold Storage

http://eaglecoldstorage.com/

Eagle Flexible Packaging

www.eagleflexible.com

Blanco, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

1100 Kingsland 1100 Kingsland Drive,Batavia, IL Drive,Batavia, IL 60510 60510

ECKART America Corporation www.eckart.net

1 Wilson Manor 1 Wilson Manor Court,Chesterfie Court,Chesterfie ld, MO 63005 ld, MO 63005

ECOGREEN

Avenida Las Américas, 5-83, Zona 14, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.

EcoPack

Avenida Las Américas, 5-83, Zona 14, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.

http://ecopackgreenbox.com/

Edanaro

USA

EDECA (ENVASES DESECHABLES DE C.A.)

www.edecasa.com.

14 calle final, interior El Zapote, Zona 2.

Edwards Label

www.edwardslabel.com

2277 Knoll Drive,Ventura, CA 93003

EE Print Pack

http://www.eeprintpack.com.mx/

EFI

www.efi.com

EL LABRADOR Ellepot-USA Emerald Packaging, Inc.

6750 Dumbarton 6750 Dumbarton Circle,Fremont, Circle,Fremont, CA 94555 CA 94555 7ª Avenida 3-33, Zona 9, Torre Empresarial 805, Guatemala, Guatemala.

7ª Avenida 3-33, Zona 9, Torre Empresarial 805, Guatemala, Guatemala.

33050 Western Avenue Union City, CA 94587

http://www.blackmoreco.com/

www.empack.com

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Empacadoras Org

USA Mexico

EMPAFLEX

Barrio La Guardia, 1ª y 2ª avenida, 32 calle Suroeste, a la par de Europlast, San Pedro Sula, Cortés, Honduras.

EMPAQUES Y PRODUCTOS DE PLÁSTICO

www.epphn.com.

Colonia Santa María, 27 calle, 300 metros después de Shell Zorzales (Uno).

www.eppsv.com.

Boulevard Vijosa, Edificio Salaverría Cáceres, Bodegas 1, 2 y 3, Ciudad Merliot, Antiguo Cuscatlán, El Salvador.

EMPAQUES Y PRODUCTOS PLÁSTICOS DE EL SALVADOR

Edificio Salaverría Cáceres y Boulevard Vicosa, calle L-1 bodegas 1 y 2, Ciudad Merliot, La Libertad, El Salvador.

Empresa Gustech

Mexico

Energy Sciences, Inc. www.EBEAM.com

42 Industrial Way, Wilmington, MA 01887

EMPAQUES Y PRODUCTOS DE PLÁSTICO S.A. DE C.V.

42 Industrial Way, Wilmington, MA 01887

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

ENVASES DESECHABLES CENTROAMERIC ANOS. S.A. www.edecasa.com.

14 calle final, interior El Zapote, Zona 2, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.

ENVASES PLÁSTICOS

http://www.grupoindustrialeec.com.

27 calle S.E., frente a Gasolinera Shell “Zorzales”, Colonia Santa María. San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

www.evonik.com

299 Jefferson 299 Jefferson Road,Parsippan Road,Parsippan y, NJ 07054 y, NJ 07054

Evonik Corporation

EXPLAHSA

Km 18 Carretera Norte, Valle de Amarateca, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

EXTRUDOPLAST www.extrudoplast.com.

13 Calle, 12-96 Z.11, BODEX Oficomercio, 2D Guatemala, Guatemala.

ExxonMobil Chemical Company

22777 Springwoods Village Parkway Spring, TX 77389

Colonia Jacaranda, carretera a El Picacho, Casa No. 2101, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

www.exxonmobil.com

FARO COMERCIAL

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

www.fernandezsera.com.

De la intersección de Pista del Mayoreo con camino a Sabana Grande, 2 Km al Este. Apartado Postal A-258, Managua, Nicaragua.

www.filmtechinc.com

200 Industrial Drive Bean Station, TN 37708

www.flexfilm.com

1221 North Black Branch Road Elizabethtown, KY 42701

www.flexaprint.com.

7 calle poniente, 87 y 89 Avenida Norte. Residencial Fountain Blue H1, Colonia Escalón, San Salvador, El Salvador.

FLEXAPRINT S.A.

Avenida Las Rosas, L. 123 “Jardines de San Lucas IV”, San Lucas Sac., Guatemala.

Flexo Concepts

100 Armstrong Road, Suite 103, Plymouth, MA 02360

Flexo Manufacturing Corporation

275 A Mabini Street Caloocan, City 1400 Philippines

FERNÁNDEZ SERA S.A.

FILMtech Inc.

Flex Films (USA) Inc.

FLEXAPRINT DE EL SALVADOR

www.flexo.com.ph

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Flint Group

www.flintgrp.com

Floralife

http://www.floralife.com/en

Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

http://www.freshfromflorida.com/

14909 Beck 14909 Beck Road, Plymouth, Road, Plymouth, MI 48170 MI 48170

Forem Packaging www.forempackaging.com

2-44 Cornelia Street,Newark, NJ 07105

FORMAS TÉRMICAS

Carretera a Occidente, Km 17 ½ Naco Cortés, Honduras.

9 Peach Tree Hill Road Livingston, NJ 07039

699 N. Frankston Highway Frankston, TX 75763

Fujifilm North America Corporation, Graphic Systems Division www.FujifilmGraphics.com

1101 West Cambridge Drive Kansas City, KS 66103

FUNDIDORAS DEL NORTE S.A.

Km 4 Boulevard del Sur, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

Genpak LP

285 Industrial Parkway South Aurora, Ontario L4G 3V8 Canada

www.formastermicas.net.

Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A. www.fpcusa.com Fox Packaging, Inc.

Frankston Packaging

http://www.foxbag.com/

www.frankstonpackaging.com

www.progressivepac.com

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Georgia-Pacific Corrugated

http://www.gppackaging.com/corrugated/P ages/default.aspx

Giro Pack Inc.

http://giro.es/

www.glenroy.com

W158 N9332 Nor-X-Way Avenue Menomonee Falls, WI 53051

www.gloucesterengineering.com

Blackburn Industrial Park 11 Dory Road, Gloucester, MA 01930

Goss International

www.GossInternational.com

121 Technology 121 Technology Drive,Durham, Drive,Durham, NH 03824 NH 03824

Green Ox Pallet Technology

http://greenoxpallets.com

Glenroy, Inc.

Gloucester Engineering Co., Inc.

GRUPO VICAL

Boulevard Suyapa, Contiguo a Suzuki, 50 metros al Este de Gasolinera Shell La Hacienda, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

H.B. Fuller

1200 Willow Lake Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55110

11625 Steele Creek Road PO Box 38490,Charlotte, NC 28278

www.hbfuller.com

Hampshire Paper http://www.berwickoffraywholesale.com/ Harpak-ULMA

http://www.harpak-ulma.com/

Harper Corporation of America

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Henkel Corporation

Hewlett Packard

www.henkelna.com/liofol

203 MacKenan Court,Cary, NC 27511-6445

www.hp.com

5555 Windward 5555 Windward Parkway,Alphar Parkway,Alphar etta, GA 30004 etta, GA 30004 N26W23322 Paul N26W23322 Paul Road Pewaukee, Road Pewaukee, WI 53072 WI 53072

HFM Packaging, Ltd. Highland Supply Corporation

http://www.highlandsupply.com/

Hollandia Produce L.P.

http://www.livegourmet.com/

HONDUPLAST (PLÁSTICOS DE HONDURAS)

Avenida New Orleans, 1 cuadra al sur del Técnico Alemán, San Pedro Sula, Cortés.

HONDUPRINT

Barrio La Guardia. Apartado Postal No.1105, San Pedro Sula, Honduras

HONDUTERRA

Aldea Villa Vieja, salida a Danlí, Km 4, después de la posta policial, primer desvío a mano izquierda.

Hosokawa Alpine American

5 Michigan 5 Michigan Drive,Natick, MA Drive,Natick, MA 01760 01760

HQC Inc.

230 Kendall Point Drive Oswego, IL 60543

www.hqcinc.com

Hurst International, LLC http://www.hurstinternational.net/ Related articles and information Latest reports and educational tutorials about green business News and key insights for Alternative financing in US and Mexico Press releases and reports about food processing Reports and resources related to Packaging Machinery for foods

230 Kendall Point Drive Oswego, IL 60543

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Image Plastics & Packaging

http://imageplasticsandpackaging.com/ 5ª Avenida, 11 Calle Suroeste, Barrio Lempira frente al cementerio. San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

5ª Avenida, 11 Calle Suroeste, Barrio Lempira frente al cementerio. San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

IMPORMA

Colonia 21 de Octubre, frente a las bodegas Lázaro, cerca de Canal 13, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

INDUSTRIAS ELECTRIGAS

Boulevard 21 octubre, contiguo a los puentes, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

INDUSTRIAS READI S.A. DE C.V.

Barrio Concepción, 12 Avenida Sur, No. 132, San Salvador, El Salvador.

Oficina principal, 3ª Avenida N.O. # 65 entre 9 y 10 calle. Bo. Las Acacias, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

IMET

Infia SRL

www.imethonduras.com.

http://www.infia.it/

INFRA DE HONDURAS Inline Plastics Corp

http://www.inlineplastics.com/

INPLASA Related articles and information Latest reports and educational tutorials about green business News and key insights for Alternative financing in US and Mexico Press releases and reports about food processing Reports and resources related to Packaging Machinery for foods

Valle de Valle de Amarateca, en el Amarateca, en el desvío al desvío al

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Hospital Santa Rosita.

Avenida Junior, 12 calle N.E. San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

INVERSIONES SUÁREZ

7ª calle, arriba de la Agencia La Global, entre la 12ª y 13ª avenida, a mano derecha en un local que dice TPA. Armando Suáre

ISO Poly Films, Inc.

www.isopoly.com

101 ISO 101 ISO Parkway,Gray Parkway,Gray Court, SC 29645 Court, SC 29645

JBF RAK LLC

www.jbfrak.com

PO Box No. 6574, AL JAZEERAH AL HAMRA,Ras AL Khaimah, UAE UAE

JetRam Floral Packaging

customerservice@jetraminc.com

Jinxing Packaging Co., Ltd

http://www.shjinxing.com.cn 2999 W. Spencer Street Suite 2010,Appleton, WI 54914

2999 W. Spencer Street Suite 2010,Appleton, WI 54914

175 SW 7th Street Suite

INPONO

www.grupoinpono.com.

International Paper

http://www.internationalpaper.com/

Interstate Container

http://www.interstateresources.com

JL Packaging Corporation Jolo Flowers

http://www.jolofarms.com/

Karlville Development, LLC

www.karlville.com

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

2103,Miami, FL 33130

KBA Flexotecnica www.kba.com/us Kronen Corp

Kuraray

2103,Miami, FL 33130

2555 Regent 2555 Regent Boulevard,Dalla Boulevard,Dalla s, TX 75261 s, TX 75261

http://www.kronen.eu/en/

www.kuraray.us.com

2625 Bay Area Boulevard Suite 600,Houston, TX 77058

Label Technology Inc. www.labeltech.com

2050 Wardrobe 2050 Wardrobe Avenue,Merced, Avenue,Merced, CA 95341 CA 95341

LACOPLAST S.A. www.lacoplast.com.gt.

24 Avenida 19-05, Zona 12, Calzada Atanasio Tzul.

LEOPLAST (ANTES DINAPLAST)

http://www.leoplasthn.com.

Barrio Pueblo Nuevo, # 3344, frente a Hondupalma, una calle antes de la Colonia Argentina, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

www.liquibox.com

901 East Byrd Street Suite 1105, Richmond, VA 23219

www.logisticoshn.com.

Colonia El Prado, 3ª entrada. Planta: delante de Café Maya, Amarateca, Francisco Morazán.

www.lpsind.com

10 Caesar Place, 10 Caesar Place, Moonachie, NJ Moonachie, NJ 07074 07074

Liqui-Box Corporation

LOGÍSTICOS HONDURAS LPS Industries, LLC

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Lubrizol Advanced Materials

www.lubrizol.com

9911 Brecksville 9911 Brecksville Road,Brecksvill Road,Brecksvill e, Ohio 44141 e, Ohio 44141

LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell Tower 1221 McKinney Street,Suite 300,Houston, TX 77010

M33 Integrated

PO Box PO Box 27127,Greenville 27127,Greenville , SC 29616 , SC 29616

MacDermid Printing Solutions printing.macdermid.com

5210 Phillip Lee 5210 Phillip Lee Drive Atlanta, Drive Atlanta, GA 30336 GA 30336

MAQUIMUNDO

Barrio Guadalupe, Avenida Juan Manuel Gálvez, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

18081 Chesterfield Airport Road Chesterfield, MO 63005

Eldan Park, Bo. Patubig Marilao, Bulacan 3019 Philippines

Carretera Troncal del Norte, Km 7 ½, Ciudad Delgado, San Salvador, El Salvador. 235 S. LaSalle Street

Mariani Packing Company

Mark Andy, Inc.

http://www.mariani.com/

www.markandy.com

Markenburg International Foods Corporation Market Source

LyondellBasell Tower 1221 McKinney Street,Suite 300,Houston, TX 77010

http://www.maglioproduce.com/

MATRICERIA INDUSTRIAL ROXY S.A. DE C.V.

www.matriceriaroxy.com.

Carretera Troncal del Norte, Km 7 ½, Ciudad Delgado, San Salvador, El Salvador.

Max Katz Bag Company, Inc.

http://maxkatzbag.com/

235 S. LaSalle Street

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Indianapolis, IN 46201-4334

MEGAPLAST S.A. www.megaplast.com.gt.

Carretera al PacĂfico, Km 15.5, Villanueva, Guatemala, Guatemala.

Menges Roller Company, Inc.

260 Industrial 260 Industrial Drive,Wauconda Drive,Wauconda , IL 60084 , IL 60084

www.mengesroller.com

Meshdecor

Mica Corporation www.mica-corp.com

9 Mountain View 9 Mountain View Drive Shelton, Drive Shelton, CT 06484 CT 06484

Michelman

KrisBecknell@michelman.com

9080 Shell Road, 9080 Shell Road, Cincinnati, OH Cincinnati, OH 45236 45236

www.m-petfilm.com

2001 Hood Road,PO Box 1400,Greer, SC 29652

14591 State Highway 177,Jackson, MO 63755

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.

Mondi Jackson LLC Monte Package Company

http://www.montepkg.com/

Multifilm Packaging Corporation

www.multifilm.com

NNZ Inc.

http://www.nnz.com/

Nordmeccanica, NA

Nordson Corporation

1040 N. McLean 1040 N. McLean Boulevard Elgin, Boulevard Elgin, IL 60123 IL 60123

www.nordmeccanica.com

155 Ricefield 155 Ricefield Lane,Hauppaug Lane,Hauppaug e, NY 11788 e, NY 11788

www.nordson.com

645 Hembree Parkway,Suite D,Roswell, GA 30076

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

NOVA Chemicals, Inc. www.novachem.com

1555 Coraopolis Heights Road Moon Township, PA 15108

NOVAPLASTIC S.A.

40 Calle, 22-26 Zona 12, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.

NOVOLEX™

www.novolex.com

101 East Carolina Avenue Hartsville, SC 29550

Oliver-Tolas Healthcare Packaging

www.oliver-tolas.com

445 Sixth Street NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49504

Oneonta Starr Ranch Growers

http://www.oneonta.com/ 1188 South Houk Road Delaware, OH 43015

1188 South Houk Road Delaware, OH 43015

Optimum Plastics, Inc.

www.optimumplastics.com

Oracle Packaging www.oraclepackaging.com

220 Polo Road, 220 Polo Road, Winston-Salem, Winston-Salem, NC 27105 NC 27105

Outlook Group Corporation

www.outlookgroup.com

1180 American Drive, Neenah, WI 54956

P&O Packaging, LLC

www.popackaging.com

1403 Needham Drive,DALTON, GA 30720

Pacific AgPak

http://www.pacificagpak.com/

Packaging Personified Inc.

http://www.packagingpersonified.com/ Barrio San Jacinto, Residencial América, calle

Barrio San Jacinto, Residencial América, calle

Oxnard Growers/Shippers

PACKPRINT S.A. DE C.V.

www.packprint.biz.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Cristóbal Colón 10, San Salvador, El Salvador.

www.paramelt.com

2817 McCracken Street, Muskegon, MI 49441

www.pegaprinthn.com.

En San Pedro Sula, Cortés: 24 calle, 20 avenida S.E. Segundo anillo Circunvalación frente a ZIP San José.

Apartado 4457, Lima, Lima 16 Peru

Plastic Packaging Technologies, LLC www.plaspack.com

750 S. 65th Street Kansas City, KS 66111

Plastic Suppliers, Inc. www.plasticsuppliers.com

2887 Johnstown Road, Columbus, OH 43219

PLÁSTICOS CORPLASA

www.grupoindustrialeec.com.

Colonia 21 de octubre, salida a Valle de Ángeles, en las antiguas oficinas de Valentino.

www.plasticosgamoz.com

1 cuadra al este de Foam de Honduras, San Pedro Sula, Cortés.

Paramelt

PEGAPRINT

PERUPLAST S.A. www.peruplast.com.pe Pharr International Bridge

PLÁSTICOS GAMOZ S.A. DE C.V.

http://pharr-tx.gov/

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Rivera de Belén, Heredia, contiguo a las bodegas de la Coca Cola.

PLÁSTICOS MODERNOS S.A. www.pmodernos.com

Carretera Norte, Km 3½, Managua, Nicaragua.

PLÁSTICOS TONY

Barrio Guanacaste, Avenida Gutenberg, No. 1735, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

PLÁSTICOS VANGUARDIA S. DE R.L. DE C.V.

www.vanguardiahn.com.

200 metros al sur del C.T.H.A. Barrio La Guardia. Apartado Postal No. 1105, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

www.plastimaxsa.com.

3ª calle, 0-81 Zona 1, Boca del Norte, Villa Canales, Guatemala, Guatemala. Skype:

www.poliflexsa.com.

Calle a Valle Nuevo No. 5, Colonia Santa Lucía, Ilopango, San Salvador, El Salvador.

www.polytec.com.gt.

1ª Calle, 2-68, Zona 2, Colonia San José, Villa Nueva, Guatemala.

PLÁSTICOS MODERNOS

PLASTIMAX

POLIFLEX S.A. DE C.V.

POLÍMEROS Y TECNOLOGÍA S.A.

www.plasticos-modernos.com.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Código Postal 01064.

POLINDUSTRIAS S.A. www.polindustrias.com.

Kilómetro 12, Carretera a Villa Canales, Boca del Monte, Guatemala, Guatemala.

Poly Print Inc.

2300 W. Wetmore Road Tucson, Arizona 85705-2051

www.polymerpkg.com

8333 Navarre Road SE Massillon, OH 44646

www.polyplex.com

3001 Mallard Fox Drive NW Decatur, AL 35601

www.precoinc.com

500 Laser 500 Laser Drive,Somerset, Drive,Somerset, WI 54025 WI 54025

www.polyprint.com

POLYMER HONDURAS Polymer Logistics http://www.polymerlogistics.com/en/

Polymer Packaging Inc.

Polyplex USA, LLC

Preco, Inc.

Prime Packaging, LLC www.primepkg.com

501 N. Central Avenue,Wood Dale, IL 60191

Printpack

www.printpack.com

PO Box 723608, PO Box 723608, Atlanta, GA Atlanta, GA 31139 31139

www.prolamina.com

13536 Dahlia 13536 Dahlia Court,Rosemou Court,Rosemou nt, MN 55068 nt, MN 55068

Prolamina Corporation

Estatua Monseñor Lezcano, 6 ½ cuadras al Este, Barrio PROQUINFA S.A. www.proquinfa.com. www.distcaribe.com. Monseñor Related articles and information Latest reports and educational tutorials about green business News and key insights for Alternative financing in US and Mexico Press releases and reports about food processing Reports and resources related to Packaging Machinery for foods

501 N. Central Avenue,Wood Dale, IL 60191

Estatua Monseñor Lezcano, 6 ½ cuadras al Este, Barrio Monseñor

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Lezcano, Managua, Nicaragua. R.O.P.

Lezcano, Managua, Nicaragua.

http://www.rop.co.il/

Reifenhauser Inc.

12260 W. 53rd 12260 W. 53rd Street North Street North Maize, KS 67101 Maize, KS 67101

REPRESENTACIO NES ROJAS

Plaza Los Dolores, Avenida Máximo Jerez, Casa No. 1310, Barrio Los Dolores, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

RKW North America Inc.

www.rkw-group.com

270 Reasonover 270 Reasonover Drive,Franklin, Drive,Franklin, KY 42134 KY 42134

www.robbieflexibles.com

10810 Mid America Avenue Lenexa, KS 66219

www.rollprint.com

320 S. Stewart Avenue Addison, IL 60101-3310

ROTOPRIN S.A.

10 Avenida, # 31-39, Zona 5, Ciudad de Guatemala, 01005, Guatemala.

RYELSA

150 metros Sur, del costado suroeste del Estadio Lito Monge. Barrio San José, Curridabat, San José, Costa Rica.

Robbie flexibles Rollprint Packaging Products, Inc.

www.indelsacr.com.

Plaza Los Dolores, Avenida Máximo Jerez, Casa No. 1310, Barrio Los Dolores, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Salsa

http://www.salsa-mx.com/ Zona Industrial Plan de La Laguna, Bloque E # 5, Antiguo

Zona Industrial Plan de La Laguna, Bloque E # 5, Antiguo

Sasol North America

12120 Wickchester Lane,Houston, TX 77079

SEALED AIR CENTRAL AMERICA S.A.

Avenida Hincapié, 16-55, Z-13, Guatemala, Guatemala.

Sealed Air Corporation

www.sealedair.com

Post Office Box 464, 100 Rogers Bridge Road Building A, Duncan, SC 29334

Sealstrip Corporation

www.sealstrip.com

103 Industrial 103 Industrial Drive,Gilbertsvill Drive,Gilbertsvill e, PA 19525 e, PA 19525

Seng Seng Plastic Co., Ltd.

http://www.seng-seng.com/

SerPak Co Ltd

http://www.prolongpac.com/

Sev-Rend

http://www.sev-rend.com/#4

SALVAPLASTIC S.A. de C.V.

www.termo.com.sv.

Sambrailo Packaging

http://www.sambrailo.com/

Siegwerk USA Co.

www.siegwerk.com

Silgan White Cap www.silganwhitecap.com Sixto Packaging

http://www.sixtopack.com/

3535 SW 56th Street Des Moines, IA 50321

1140 W. 31st Street,Downers Grove, Illinois 60515

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

SOLUCIONES PLÁSTICAS

46 Calle, 21-71, Zona 12, Guatemala, Guatemala.

SOLUCIONES PLÁSTICAS DE GUATEMALA

www.solucionesplasticas.com.

Km 17.5 carretera a San José Pinula, Empresarial San José, Interior # 8, Guatemala, 2212.

Sonoco Flexible Packaging

www.sonoco.com

1 North Second Street, Hartsville, SC 29550

Specialty Packaging Technologies, Inc.

2756 Alft Lane,Elgin, IL www.specialtypackagingtechnologies.com 60124 80 Moreau Street,Saint-Jea n-sur-Richelieu, Quebec J2W 2M4 Canada

80 Moreau Street,Saint-Jea n-sur-Richelieu, Quebec J2W 2M4 Canada

www.sunchemical.com

135 West Lake Street Northlake, IL 60164

www.sunflexpackagers.com

2 Commerce Drive,Cranford, NJ 07016

www.sungan.net

33, Madogongdan-r o 6-gil, Mado-myeon,Hw aseong-si, Kyungki-do 445-861 Korea

St. Johns Packaging Ltd. StePac, North America

http://www.stepac.com/

STRAUSS

http://strauss-pack.com/en/

Sun Chemical Corporation SunFlex Packagers Inc.

Sung An Machinery Company, Ltd. (SAM)

2756 Alft Lane,Elgin, IL 60124

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Sunkist Growers

http://www.sunkist.com/

Super Industrial Online

USA

TC Transcontinental Packaging

100 B Royal Group Crescent Vaughan, ON L4H 1X9,Canada

Technipaq Inc.

975 Lutter Drive 975 Lutter Drive Crystal Lake, IL Crystal Lake, IL 60014 60014

www.technipaq.com

100 B Royal Group Crescent Vaughan, ON L4H 1X9,Canada

Techno sachets

Mexico

TECNIPLAST S.A. www.tecniplast.com.gt.

28 Calle A, 0-08, Zona 8, Guatemala, Guatemala.

TECNOPACK S.A.

40 Calle, 22-15, Zona 12, Guatemala, Guatemala.

Carretera Troncal del Norte y 25 Calle Oriente # 4. P.O. BOX 1201, San Salvador, El Salvador.

Carretera Norte Km 5.5, 800 metros al Norte del paso a desnivel. Parque Industrial Portezuelo, Nave # 25 B.

Temkin Floral

http://www.gotemkin.com/

Temkin International, Inc. http://www.temkininternational.com/

TEMSA (TĂ&#x2030;CNICO MERCANTIL S.A. DE C.V.) TENRIT Foodtec

http://www.tenrit-foodtec.de/startseite/

TERMO ENCOGIBLE

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

TERMO ENCOGIBLES S.A. DE C.V.

Terphane, Inc.

tesa tape, inc.

Managua, Nicaragua.

www.termo.com

Calle L-3, Polígono D, Lote 1 y 2. Zona Industrial, Ciudad Merliot, La Libertad, El Salvador.

www.terphane.com

2754 West Park Drive Bloomfield, NY 14469

www.tesatape.com

5825 Carnegie 5825 Carnegie Boulevard,Charl Boulevard,Charl otte, NC 28209 otte, NC 28209

Textiles Agricolas http://www.grupotextiles.com.mx/ The Blanc Industries Signage & Display Group

https://blancind.com/

The Dow Chemical Company

www.dow.com

Toluca Foods, Inc.

http://www.tolucafoods.com/

Transilwrap Company Inc. Tredegar Film Products Tufco Technologies

Ultimate Flex

2030 Dow 2030 Dow Center,Midland, Center,Midland, MI 48674 MI 48674

www.transilwrap.com

9201 W. Belmont Avenue Franklin Park, IL 60131

www.tredegarfilms.com

1100 Boulders Parkway,Richm ond, VA 23225

www.tufco.com

3161 S. Ridge Road,Green Bay, WI 54304

www.ultimate-flex.com

360 S. 9th Avenue,City of Industry, CA 91746

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

www.utecona.com

3400 Town Point Drive Suite 160,Kennesaw, GA 30144

www.grupovical.com.

Avenida Petapa, 48-01, Z 12, Guatemala, Guatemala.

San Nicolรกs, del Taller 3M, 500 metros Noreste, Cartago, Costa Rica.

201 Park Avenue Lake Villa, IL 60046

Watson Standard www.watsonstandard.com

616 Hite Road,Harwick, PA 15049

Westlake Chemical Corporation

www.westlake.com

2801 Post Oak Boulevard Houston, TX 77056

WestRock

http://www.westrock.com/en-us/index.html

www.wikoff.com

1886 Merritt Road,Fort Mill, SC 29715

Windmoeller & Hoelscher Corporation

www.whcorp.com

23 New England 23 New England Way Lincoln, RI Way Lincoln, RI 02865 02865

Yerecic Label

http://ylfresh.com/

UTECO North America, Inc.

VICAL

VICESA (GRUPO VICAL) Volm Companies, Inc. http://volmcompanies.com/ Vonco Products, LLC

Wikoff Color Corporation

Zacros America, Inc.

www.vonco.com

www.zacrosamerica.com

1821 Walden Office Square,Suite 400,Schaumbur g, IL 60173

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Sustainable packaging Insights Sustainable packaging is the development and use of packaging which results in improved sustainability. This involves increased use of life cycle inventory (LCI) and life cycle assessment (LCA) to help guide the use of packaging which reduces the environmental impact and ecological footprint. It includes a look at the whole of the supply chain: from basic function, to marketing, and then through to end of life (LCA) and rebirth.[4] Additionally, an eco-cost to value ratio can be useful[5]

The goals are to improve the long term viability and quality of life for humans and the longevity of natural ecosystems. Sustainable packaging must meet the functional and economic needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Sustainability is not necessarily an end state but is a continuing process of improvement. Sustainable packaging is a relatively new addition to the environmental considerations for packaging (see Packaging and labeling). It requires more analysis and documentation to look at the package design, choice of materials, processing, and life-cycle. This is not just the vague "green movement" that many businesses and companies have been trying to include over the past years. Companies implementing these eco-friendly actions are reducing their carbon footprint, using more recycled materials and reusing more package components.[8] They often encourage suppliers, contract packagers, and distributors to do likewise.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

For example, researchers at the Agricultural Research Service are looking into using dairy-based films as an alternative to petroleum-based packaging. [1] Instead of being made of synthetic polymers, these dairy-based films would be composed of proteins such as casein and whey, which are found in milk. The films would be biodegradable and offer better oxygen barriers than synthetic, chemical-based films. More research must be done to improve the water barrier quality of the dairy-based film, but advances in sustainable packaging are actively being pursued. Environmental marketing claims on packages need to be made (and read) with caution. Ambiguous greenwashing titles such as green packaging and environmentally friendly can be confusing without specific definition. Some regulators, such as the US Federal Trade Commission, are providing guidance to packagers. Companies have long been reusing and recycling packaging when economically viable. Using minimal packaging has also been a common goal to help reduce costs. Recent years have accelerated these efforts based on social movements, consumer pressure, and regulation. All phases of packaging, distribution, and logistics are included

Sustainable packaging is no longer focused on just recycling. Just as packaging is not the only eco target, although it is still top of mind for many. Right or wrong, packaging is frequently scrutinized and used as the measure of a company's overall sustainability, even though it may contribute only a small percentage to the total eco impact compared to other things, such as transportation, and water and energy use.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Vertical Packaging Machine for powders Bag Form Fill Seal Packaging machine, Multi-lane stick pack machines for salt, sugar, spices and the most common food powders

● ● ● ● ●

Steel body structure Requires minimum maintenance Easy to operate 24 hours per day non stop Stainless steel in areas that are in contact with the product American components and built in Mexico with American made parts

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Verified US suppliers on the web: Agents of Contract Packaging Services

Techno sachets

North America

Distribuitors of Packaging Machinery

Edanaro

Americas

Online store for Packaging supplies

Super Industrial Online

Americas

Manufacturers of Vertical form fill systems

Gustech

Mexico

Too Toxic: EPA Rejects Dow’s Herbicide Enlist Duo WASHINGTON, DC, November 25, 2015 (ENS) – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says it will vacate its approval of the Dow AgroSciences herbicide Enlist Duo after determining that its combination of chemicals could be more harmful than initially believed. Responding to a lawsuit by conservation groups, in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday, the EPAmoved for voluntary vacatur and remand of EPA’s registration of Dow AgroSciences’ Enlist Duo herbicide under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, FIFRA.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Farmer inspects weeds in his soybean field, Sept. 2013 (Photo by United Soybean Board) Approved by the agency in October 2014, Enlist Duo is an herbicide developed for use on corn and soybean crops that are genetically engineered to be resistant to the two active ingredients in Enlist Duo, glyphosate and 2,4-D. The EPA told the court that it has “new information regarding potential synergistic effects between the two ingredients on non-target plants,” so the agency wants to “reconsider the Enlist Duo registration in light of the new information.” “EPA cannot be sure, without a full analysis of the new information, that the current registration does not cause unreasonable effects to the environment, which is a requirement of the registration standard under FIFRA.” While the plaintiff conservation groups do not oppose the EPA’s motion to vacate Enlist Due’s registration, counsel for Dow told the court the company intends to file a response to the motion. Just after the agency approved Dow’s herbicide, EPA discovered that Dow made claims of “synergistic herbicidal weed control” in its provisional patent application for Enlist Duo.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Dow filed its final patent application on December 11, 2014, a month after EPA approved the herbicide.

With these two photos Dow tries to show that Enlist Duo drifts less than another mix of the two active chemicals in the herbicide at issue. (Photos courtesy Dow Agrosciences)

EPA told the court on Tuesday that “the claimed ‘synergism’ could affect the agency’s assessment of drift reduction measures for avoiding impacts to non-target organisms, including those listed as endangered…” Concern for endangered species exposed to the herbicide is what caused conservation groups to sue the agency. The groups challenged EPA’s failure to consider the impacts of Enlist Duo on threatened and endangered plants and animals protected under the Endangered Species Act. The EPA approval was challenged by Earthjustice and Center for Food Safety, on behalf of Center for Food Safety, Beyond Pesticides, the Center for Biological Diversity, Environmental Working Group, the National Family Farm Coalition and Pesticide Action Network North America.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

The Endangered Species Act requires that every federal agency consider the impacts of its actions on America’s most imperiled plants and animals and seek input from expert wildlife agencies before acting. “With this action, EPA confirms the toxic nature of this lethal cocktail of chemicals, and has stepped back from the brink,” said Earthjustice Managing Attorney Paul Achitoff. “Glyphosate is a probable carcinogen and is wiping out the monarch butterfly, 2,4-D also causes serious human health effects, and the combination also threatens endangered wildlife,” Achitoff said. “This must not, and will not, be how we grow our food.”1:02 PM 11/25/2015 Judy Hatcher, executive director of Pesticide Action Network North America, said, “EPA is taking a step in the right direction, but Enlist Duo shouldn’t have been given the green light in the first place.” “Too often, GE seeds and the herbicides designed to accompany them are rushed to market without thorough evaluation of their real-world impacts on community health and farmer livelihoods, said Hatcher. The Enlist Duo label states, “This pesticide is toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates. Do not apply directly to water, to areas where surface water is present, or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Drift or runoff may adversely affect aquatic invertebrates and non-target plants. Drift and runoff may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in water adjacent to treated areas.”

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

A portion of the Enlist Duo product label. (Image courtesy Dow Agrosciences)

The EPA had approved use of Enlist Duo in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma and North Dakota, and had intended to approve it in additional areas in the near future. “The decision by EPA to withdraw the illegally approved Enlist Duo crops is a huge victory for the environment and the future of our food,” said George Kimbrell, Center for Food Safety’s senior attorney. “This Thanksgiving, I’m thankful for the EPA taking this important action to protect people, rare plants and animals from Enlist Duo,” said Lori Ann Burd, environmental health director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “As we gather with our families for the holiday feast, we can all breathe a little bit

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

easier knowing that the EPA has protected our food from being drenched with this poisonous pesticide cocktail.”

U.S. Approves First Transgenic Animal for Human Food WASHINGTON, DC, November 20, 2015 (ENS) – Over the objections of millions of Americans, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved a genetically engineered animal food. Atlantic salmon engineered for faster than normal growth was approved by the agency for sale, no label required.

Wild-caught salmon on ice at Seattle’s Pike Place Market (Photo by Kevin Galens) “The FDA has thoroughly analyzed and evaluated the data and information submitted by AquaBounty Technologies regarding AquAdvantage Salmon and determined that they have met the regulatory requirements for approval, including that food from the fish is safe to eat,” said Bernadette Dunham, DVM, PhD, director of the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Made public Thursday, the approval has already drawn threats of a lawsuit and vows not to sell the AquaBounty salmon by thousands of grocery stores nationwide. More than 60 grocery chains, including Safeway, Kroger, Trader Joe’s and Target, with more than 9,000 stores across the United States, have made commitments to not sell this fish, dubbed “frankenfish” by its opponents such as Friends of the Earth. A growth hormone-regulating gene from a Pacific Chinook salmon and a promoter from an ocean pout were added to the Atlantic salmon’s 40,000 genes. These genes enable the farmed salmon to grow year-round instead of only during spring and summer. The purpose of the genetic modifications is to grow the fish to market size in 16 to 18 months rather than three years. Based in Maynard, Massachusetts, publicly-traded AquaBounty Technologies is a biotechnology company focused on “enhancing productivity in aquaculture,” and a majority-owned subsidiary of Intrexon Corporation. AquaBounty CEO Ronald Stotish, PhD calls AquAdvantage salmon …”a game-changer that brings healthy and nutritious food to consumers in an environmentally responsible manner without damaging the ocean and other marine habitats.”

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

AquaBounty salmon are raised in land-based tanks. (Photo courtesy AquaBounty) “While farming salmon in sea cages is less expensive and less technologically complex than a land-based farm, land-based salmon farming eliminates many of the environmental problems with net-pen farms,” AquaBounty explains on its website. “Sea cages are susceptible to a number of hazards such as violent storms, predators, harmful algal blooms, jellyfish attacks, and the transmission of pathogens and parasites from wild fish populations passing close to the sea cages.” “Using land-based aquaculture systems, this rich source of protein and other nutrients can be farmed close to major consumer markets in a more sustainable manner,” Stotish said. The company says that land-based aquaculture systems can provide a continuous supply of fresh, safe, traceable, and sustainable AquAdvantage Salmon to communities across the United States and do it with a reduced carbon footprint. “It offers an alternative approach to fish farming that does not exploit the oceans,” says the company. The FDA says it conducted “an exhaustive and rigorous scientific review,” before arriving at the decision that “AquAdvantage salmon is as safe to eat as any non-genetically engineered Atlantic salmon, and also as nutritious.” “The data demonstrated that the inserted genes remained stable over several generations of fish, that food from the genetically engineered salmon is safe to eat by humans and animals, that the genetic engineering is safe for the fish, and the salmon meets the sponsor’s claim about faster growth,” the FDA said in a statement. The FDA also determined that the approval “would not have a significant impact on the environment of the United States.” “That’s because the multiple containment measures the company will use in the land-based facilities in Panama and Canada make it extremely unlikely that the fish could escape and establish themselves in the wild,” the agency stated. The FDA said that although it is not requiring labeling, food manufacturers are free to label the GMO salmon if they wish. Because the FDA recognizes that many consumers are interested in this information, and some food manufacturers will want to make the distinction, the agency released two guidance documents detailing its current thinking on labeling – a draft guidance

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/ucm469802 .htm for labeling of food derived from Atlantic salmon that has or has not been genetically engineered and a final guidance for labeling of food that has or has not been derived from genetically engineered plants. “Both guidance documents explain FDA’s best thinking on how to make it easy for consumers to know whether a food was produced using genetic engineering or not,” says Felicia Billingslea, BS, MS, director of FDA’s Division of Food Labeling and Standards. The public is invited to provide comments on this draft guidance. Starting November 23, comments can be submitted at Regulations.gov. The agency is sure to receive some blistering comments. “The FDA is supposed to protect public safety, yet the agency’s environmental review was done in the form of an environmental assessment instead of a more thorough environmental impact statement that would fully consider the threat this controversial new fish could pose to wild fish populations and ecosystems,” said Wenonah Hauter, executive director, Food & Water Watch, based in Washington, DC. “Food & Water Watch will be examining all options to stop this controversial and unnecessary GMO fish from reaching the marketplace. We urge President Obama to overturn FDA’s approval and stop GMO salmon from reaching consumers’ dinner plates,” said Hauter. “FDA’s decision also disregards AquaBounty’s disastrous environmental record, which greatly raises the stakes for an environmentally damaging escape of GMO salmon,” said Hauter. AquaBounty facilities outside the United States have dealt with an accidental disease outbreak, an accident that led to “lost” salmon, and a $9,500 fine from Panamanian regulators who found the company in breach of their environmental laws. In October 2014, officials in Panama penalized the local AquaBounty facility for failing to obtain necessary water use and pollution permits. The authorities said the company had “repeatedly violated” these regulations, and stated that these problems persisted from 2012 into 2013. AquaBounty Technologies said that Panama’s concerns were administrative in nature.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Another problem could arise if genetically modified Atlantic salmon were to escape from captivity. They could succeed in breeding and passing their genes into the wild, Canadian researchers have found, a potential risk that FDA never addressed in its risk assessment. Dr. Darek Moreau, from the Memorial University of Newfoundland, published a study in July 2011 finding that genetically engineered Atlantic salmon can cross-breed with brown trout, a related species common to areas surrounding both AquaBounty facilities, in Panama and Canada. “[Under hatchery conditions] the transgenic hybrids grew faster than the wild salmon, wild trout and wild-type hybrids,” said Moreau. “The GM hybrids also outgrew the GM salmon.” On November 17, Canadian environmental groups went to court to challenge the federal government’s approval of an application to manufacture genetically-modified salmon eggs in the province of Prince Edward Island. The eggs would then be shipped to Panama for grow out before being sold as food in North America. Ecojustice lawyers, on behalf of Living Oceans Society and the Ecology Action Centre, argued that the Canadian government acted unlawfully when it approved AquaBounty Canada Inc.’s application to manufacture genetically-modified salmon without adequate public notice and without adequate assessment for its other uses. The groups seek a court order overturning the approval. “Canadians expect government decision-making to be open and transparent, especially when it comes to something as significant as manufacturing genetically-modified salmon that may pose serious risks to wild Atlantic salmon stocks,” said Ecojustice lawyer Kaitlyn Mitchell. Back in the United States, Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Washington, DC-based Center for Food Safety, said his nonprofit plans to sue the FDA in coordination with other plaintiffs. “FDA has neglected its responsibility to protect the public,” said Kimbrell. In approving the AquaBounty transgenic salmon, FDA ignored millions of Americans and more than 40 members of Congress who have voiced their opposition. FDA also neglects the concerns of more than 300 environmental, consumer, health and animal welfare organizations, salmon and fishing groups and associations, food companies, chefs and restaurants. Some two million people filed public comments with the FDA in opposition to this action, the largest number of comments the FDA has ever received on an action.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

“The review process by FDA was inadequate, failed to fully examine the likely impacts of the salmon’s introduction, and lacked a comprehensive analysis,” said Kimbrell. This decision sets a dangerous precedent, lowering the standards of safety in this country.”

African Women in Agribusiness Resolve to Take Action DURBAN, South Africa, November 13, 2015 (ENS) – Women as key producers of food for African households will no longer cry, Estherine Fotabong assured a conference for women in agribusiness in Durban last week. “Now is the time to take action!” As the Director of Programs with the New Partnership for African Development, NEPAD, Fotabong opened the Durban International Conference on a high note.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

She focused on the theme of the conference, “Women in entrepreneurial development: A Must for Success of the Sustainable Development Goals in Africa.” The 17 Sustainable Development Goals were adopted by world governments September 25 at the landmark Sustainable Development Summit at UN Headquarters in New York. The historic new agenda, “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” was agreed by the UN’s 193 Member States. Fotabong said that now, with the Sustainable Development Goals in place, there must be a clear acknowledgment of the important role that women play in economic development as producers of 80 percent of the food on African tables. “You have power, women have power. If you are feeding 80 percent of the continent, you have power,” declared Fotabong to applause. Cyril Xaba, who serves as Member of the Executive Council for Agriculture and Rural Development in the South African province of KwaZulu-Natal, welcomed the delegates to the KZN coastal city of Durban. He said they could feel at home to deliberate in a free atmosphere.

Member of the KwaZulu Natal Executive Council for Agriculture Cyril Xaba (Photo courtesy Government of KZN)

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Xaba opened an exhibition linked to the conference where cooperatives from across the continent displayed their products. The conference was graced by local agribusiness stakeholders from across Africa and development partners: the South African Agribusiness Development; the UN Food and Agricultural Organization, FAO; a Member of the Executive Provincial Council in Durban; and a representative of the Norwegian Agency for International Development It was organized by the Gender Climate Change Agriculture Support Programme to actively engage women in agribusiness as part of climate resilience and to spearhead development. Fotabong told the delegates, “Women must realize their full potential from small to medium enterprises but also get a voice in the political process.” “It is time to realize that … the world is moving from a knowledge economy to a relationship economy. This calls for who do you know,” Fotabong said. “As such women have to organize themselves and turn to be a strong force and speak with one voice, as it is easier to get such a voice.” Fotabong urged more training for women in business planning and governance so that women can act forcefully.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

It is important to ensure that agreements made at the continental level trickle down to the average women in even remote areas of Africa, she emphasized. Fotabong said that should apply to Agenda 2063, the 50-year vision and development plan agreed in 2013 on the 50th Anniversary of the African Union. She said the trickle-down effect must also apply to the Malabo Declaration agreed in 2014 at the African Union Assembly in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea that capped the 2014 AU Year of Agriculture and Food Security. Through the Malabo Declaration, the AU Heads of State and Government committed to ending hunger by the year 2025. To achieve this they resolved to halve the current levels of post-harvest losses by 2025. “These things should not only remain on paper,” Fotabong told the delegates in Durban. “It is the duty of governments, civil society groups and development partners to take action when it comes to women in development,” she said.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Tobias Takavarasha, the UN FAO representative in South Africa, told the delegates that his institution and NEPAD have signed a Memorandum of Understanding that endorses more thrust on food security, women and youth in agriculture. He said the agreement sets forth many other interventions to foster agriculture-led development and assist both genders equally. Entrepreneur Anna Msowoya, founder of Kwithu Kitchen in the northern Malawian city of Mzuzu, said it is time governments gave more support to locally-based businesses that often face high interest rates from lending institutions and high taxes when they order packaging materials. This is in sharp contrast to the tax holiday offered to foreign investors, a development that puts local businesses at a disadvantage, she said. The gathering is building on the outcomes of the first conference on women in agribusiness, held in 2014, and also on the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals adopted in September, with particular reference to goals 2: Zero Hunger; 4: Quality Education; and 5: Gender Equality. The conference provides a platform for dialogue among stakeholders in the field of economic participation of women, including governments, development partners and civil society representatives. They are considering strategies and political economies of building an enabling environment for women entrepreneurs. Delegates will share best practices and identify new and innovative opportunities to improve rural womens’ entrepreneurial skills and develop gender-sensitive business services. They will also strengthen networking and advocacy for women entrepreneurs to encourage a progressive integration of woman-led rural businesses into the continent’s formal economy.

Eating Hot Dogs, Ham, Red Meat Raises Cancer Risk

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

LYON, France, October 27, 2015 (ENS) – Reducing consumption of red meat and processed meats can reduce the risk of colorectal, pancreatic and prostate cancers, finds a new report from the World Health Organization’s cancer agency. In a report released on Tuesday, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC, a Working Group of 22 experts from 10 countries evaluated the carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat based on a review of the scientific literature.

Processed meat party platter (Photo by Alpha) The IARC Working Group classified the consumption of processed meat as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on “sufficient evidence in humans that the consumption of processed meat causes colorectal cancer.” The Working Group classified consumption of red meat as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A), “based on limited evidence that the consumption of red meat causes cancer in humans and strong mechanistic evidence supporting a carcinogenic effect.” The experts concluded that each 50 gram (1.76 ounce) portion of processed meat eaten daily increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18 percent.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

This association was observed mainly for colorectal cancer, but associations were also seen for pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer, the Working Group said. Many studies show the links, both in populations of people and in tests that show how eating these foods can cause cancer, IARC said in its report, published in “The Lancet” medical journal. Dr. Christopher Wild, who directs IARC, said in a statement, “These findings further support current public health recommendations to limit intake of meat.” “At the same time, red meat has nutritional value,” said Dr. Wild. “These results are important in enabling governments and international regulatory agencies to conduct risk assessments, in order to balance the risks and benefits of eating red meat and processed meat and to provide the best possible dietary recommendations.” Red meat refers to all types of mammalian muscle meat, such as beef, veal, pork, lamb, mutton, horse, and goat. Processed meat refers to meat that has been transformed through salting, curing, fermentation, smoking, or other processes to enhance flavor or improve preservation.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Eating hot dogs on New York Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 5th Avenue, August 2015 (Photo by â&#x20AC;&#x2039;Steve Pisanoâ&#x20AC;&#x2039;) Most processed meats contain pork or beef, but processed meats may also contain other red meats, poultry, offal, or meat by-products such as blood. Examples of processed meat include ham, sausages, corned beef, hot dogs or frankfurters, and biltong or beef jerky as well as canned meat and meat-based preparations and sauces. The consumption of meat varies greatly between countries, with from a few percent up to 100 percent of people eating red meat, depending on the country, and somewhat lower proportions eating processed meat.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

“For an individual, the risk of developing colorectal cancer because of their consumption of processed meat remains small, but this risk increases with the amount of meat consumed,” said Dr. Kurt Straif, who heads the IARC Monographs Programme that produced this report. “In view of the large number of people who consume processed meat, the global impact on cancer incidence is of public health importance,” said Dr. Straif. The IARC Working Group considered more than 800 studies that investigated associations of more than a dozen types of cancer with the consumption of red meat or processed meat in many countries and populations with diverse diets.

Honey Bee Queens Harmed by Neonicotinoid Pesticides BERN, Switzerland, October 16, 2015 (ENS) – The first study to investigate the effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on honey bee queens finds that these chemicals may contribute to bee colony mortality by affecting queen health. It strengthens calls for more thorough environmental risk assessments of these widely used pesticides to protect bees. A research team from Bern, Switzerland and Wolfville, Canada has found that honey bee queens, which are crucial to colony functioning, are severely affected by the two neonicotinoid insecticides thiamethoxam and clothianidin. In 2013, governments in Europe moved to partially restrict the use of these neonicotinoids while further risk assessments were performed. The province of Ontario, Canada followed suit in 2015.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

A marked honey bee queen used during the study shown on a wax comb with adult workers, capped cells containing maturing workers, and open cells containing eggs that will develop into workers. (Photo: Geoffrey Williams, University of Bern)

In recent years beekeepers have had difficulties maintaining honey bee colonies throughout North America and Europe, and often experience dramatic winter mortalities. A research team from the Institute of Bee Health at the University of Bern, from Agroscope at the Swiss Confederation, and from the Department of Biology at Canada’s Acadia University, demonstrated in an article in the open-access journal “Scientific Reports” from the Nature Publishing Group that honey bee queens are “extremely vulnerable” to the neonicotinoids thiamethoxam and clothianidin. The study shows profound effects on queen physiology, anatomy, and overall reproductive success. “Alongside introduced parasites, it is believed that agricultural chemicals may play a role in these issues,” says lead author Geoff Williams of the University of Bern. Previous research suggests that exposure to these chemicals causese both lethal and sub-lethal effects on honey bee workers, but nothing has been known about how they may affect queens.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

The observation that honey bee queens are highly vulnerable to these common neonicotinoid pesticides is “worrisome, but not surprising,” says senior author Laurent Gauthier from the Swiss Confederation’s Agroscope. “Beekeepers frequently cite poor queen health as a major cause of colony death each year,” he said.

Beekeepers across the Northern Hemisphere have been struggling to keep their hives alive. (Photo byKris Fricke)

Honey bees are complex social organisms that demonstrate female reproductive division of labor between the queen and workers within a colony. Queens release chemical pheromones essential for colony social organization and usually monopolize female reproduction, while workers carry out all other tasks necessary for colony maintenance. Since there is only a single queen in each colony, queen health is crucial to colony survival. Soon after birth, each queen will embark on a series of mating flights to collect sperm from males called drones. Afterwards, she will return to her colony to lay eggs and be cared for by workers.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Co-author Peter Neumann from Bern said, “This study, along with other recently published ones, supports calls for more thorough environmental risk assessments of agricultural chemicals to protect biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.” Honey bees, like all insect pollinators, provide crucial ecosystem and economic services. Annually in Europe and North America, millions of honey bee colonies produce honey and contribute to the pollination of a range of agricultural crops, from carrots to almonds to oilseed rape, that is valued at billions of Euros. In 2013 governments in Europe took a precautionary approach by partially restricting the application of the neonicotinoid pesticides thiamethoxam, clothianidin, and imidacloprid, with the mandate to perform further environmental risk assessments. A new inter-governmental review will take place in the coming months. In late August thousands of people, some dressed as bees, swarmed in Parliament Square to protest the July decision of the UK Parliament to temporarily allow farmers to spray the toxic neonicotinoids on their crops. Over 500,000 people signed a petition opposing suspension of the ban. The UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Defra, says it followed the advice of the UK Expert Committee on Pesticides and the agency’s chief scientist, to grant a limited emergency authorization of two pesticides in areas where oil rape crops are at risk of pest damage. The Committee recommended rejecting authorising 79 percent of the crop area and instead recommended a much more limited and controlled application for five percent of the crop area for the worst affected areas. Defra’s approach contrasts with other EU countries such as Denmark, which have issued unrestricted emergency authorizations for the same use of neonicotinoids.

Plastic for Dinner DAVIS, California, October 9, 2015 (ENS) – Roughly one in every four fish sold for human consumption in certain California and Indonesian markets contain plastic fragments or textile fibers in their guts, an international team of scientists has found.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Published in the journal “Scientific Reports,” the study is one of the first to directly link plastic debris with the fish that shows up on dinner tables.

Seller at an Indonesian fish market. (Photo by Dale Trockel courtesy UC Davis)

Researchers from the University of California, Davis, and Hasanuddin University in Indonesia sampled 76 fish from markets in Makassar, Indonesia, and 64 from Half Moon Bay and Princeton in California. The researchers collected whole fish, GI tracts of fish and whole bivalves directly from fish markets or from fisherman selling their catch for human consumption. Not all fish tested had plastic in their guts. Species tested included tilapia, skipjack tuna, salmon, herring, mackerel, scad and snapper. Plastic debris or fiber was found in the guts of Indian mackerel, shortfin scad, silver-stripe round herring, two species of rabbitfish, and fish from the family Carangidae that could not be identified as to genera. In Indonesia, manufactured debris was found in 28 percent of individual fish and in 55 percent of all species. Similarly, in the United States, anthropogenic debris was found in 25 percent of individual fish and in 67 percent of all species. Manufactured debris was also found in 33 percent of individual shellfish sampled.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Students help pick up plastic from an Indonesian beach. (Photo by Susan Williams, UC Davis)

All of the fragments recovered from fish in Indonesia were plastic. In contrast, 80 percent of the debris found in California fish was fibers, but not a single strand of fiber was found in the Indonesian fish tested. “It’s interesting that there isn’t a big difference in the amount of debris in the fish from each location, but in the type – plastic or fiber,” said lead author Chelsea Rochman, a postdoctoral fellow in the Aquatic Health Program at the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine. “We think the type of debris in the fish is driven by differences in local waste management,” said Rochman. Indonesia has few landfills and little waste collection or recycling. Instead, large amounts of plastic are tossed directly onto the beaches and into the ocean. A lack of purified drinking water that forces Indonesian residents to drink bottled water, and they often toss the plastic bottles.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

“Indonesia has some of the highest marine life richness and biodiversity on Earth, and its coastal regions – mangroves, coral reefs and their beaches – are just awash in debris,” said co-author Susan Williams, a professor with the UC Davis Bodega Marine Laboratory who has worked on projects in Indonesia for years. “You have the best and the worst situation right in front of you in Indonesia.” Meanwhile, the United States has advanced systems for collecting and recycling plastics. But most Californians wash their clothes in washing machines, the water from which empties into more than 200 wastewater treatment plants off the California coast. The authors theorize that fibers remaining in sewage effluent from washing machines were ingested by the fish they sampled in the state. “To mitigate the issue in each location, it helps to think about local sources and differences in waste management strategies,” Rochman said. The scientists emphasize that the plastic and fibers are found in the fishes’ guts so humans are likely to eat the debris only if the fish is eaten whole, as it is in Indonesia, or as with sardines and anchovies or shellfish such as clams or mussels. But if people do eat the plastic debris along with their fish, the authors say they risk “physical damage leading to cellular necrosis, inflammation and lacerations of tissues in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.” “Moreover, in nature,” the authors write, “anthropogenic debris is recovered from the marine environment with a cocktail of chemicals, including chemicals accumulated from ambient water, in addition to the ingredients of the debris itself. Some of these chemicals can transfer from the debris to fish upon ingestion.” Human food security could be impacted if the plastics damage or destroy whole populations of fish, they warn. The study was funded by a UC Davis Outreach and International Program SEED Grant, the National Science Foundation’s Graduate K-12 and IGERT programs, and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences’ Superfund Research Program.

Arctic Nations Pledge to Prevent Unregulated Fishing

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

OSLO, Norway, July 19, 2015 (ENS) – The five states that surround the central Arctic Ocean on Thursday signed a declaration to prevent unregulated commercial fishing on the high seas of the 1.1 million-square-mile so-called “donut hole” in that icy ocean that fall under no country’s jurisdiction. This part of the Arctic Ocean has been locked in ice year-round until just a few years ago, but now a warming climate is making it accessible in the summer months. Even so, the declaration – signed by Canada, Denmark representing Greenland, Norway, Russia and the United States – acknowledges that commercial fishing in this area of Arctic Ocean is unlikely to occur in the near future.

A U.S. Coast Guard plane flies over the Arctic Ocean during a study of sea ice, ocean and atmosphere conditions, Sept. 2014. (Photo by John F. Williams courtesy U.S. Navy)

Still, the nations decided, the reduction of Arctic sea ice and other environmental changes in the Arctic, combined with the limited scientific knowledge about marine resources in this area, require a precautionary approach to prevent unregulated fishing in the area.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

To that end, the five countries declared that they will authorize their vessels to conduct any future commercial fishing in this area only once one or more international mechanisms are in place to manage any such fishing in accordance with recognized international standards. They also intend to establish a joint program of scientific research with the aim of improving understanding of the ecosystems of this area. Just over 400 fish species are known from Arctic seas and adjacent waters. The dominant Arctic fish families are cods, eelpouts, snailfishes, sculpins, and salmonids, according to scientists with the Arctic Ocean Diversity, based at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. One of the key species in the Arctic is the Arctic cod, â&#x20AC;&#x2039;Boreogadus saidaâ&#x20AC;&#x2039;, because it is a critical link between lower levels of the food chain and the top predators â&#x20AC;&#x201C; birds, seals and whales. The Arctic cod is the most northerly gadid, a family of fishes that includes cod, haddock, whiting, and pollack. Unlike most other oceans, commercial fisheries do not currently exist in the high Arctic, although they are extensive in the sub-Arctic southern Barents and southeastern Bering Seas. The lack of high-Arctic fisheries catch and by-catch data means even basic knowledge is lacking. The Arctic Ocean Diversity scientists say that the traditional methods of collecting fish by trawls do not work well in ice-covered waters, making it difficult even today to advance our understanding of fish biodiversity and biology. The declaration recognizes that other nations may have interests in preventing unregulated high seas fisheries in this area. It suggests the initiation of a broader process that would include commitments by all interested states. The United States assumed the two-year rotating chairmanship of the Arctic Council on April 24, 2015. The declaration signed in Oslo builds on U.S. action in 2009 to prohibit commercial fishing in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone north of the Bering Strait until better scientific information to support sound fisheries management is available. The United States initiated this five-state process consistent with congressional direction under Public Law 110-243, which calls for the United States to take steps with other Arctic nations to negotiate an agreement for managing fish stocks in the Arctic Ocean, as well as the Implementation Plan for the

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

2013 National Strategy for the Arctic Region, which commits the United States to prevent unregulated high seas fisheries in the Arctic. Globally, illegal and unregulated fishing is worth more than US20 billion. The Oslo declaration extends the work Norway initiated in March to activate new international cooperation against financial crime in the fisheries sector. The North Atlantic Fisheries Intelligence Group was founded in Oslo with the participation of Norway, Great Britain, Germany, Netherlands, Ireland, Denmark and Iceland to uncover economic crime in the fishing industry. Norway’s Minister of Fisheries Elisabeth Aspaker said then, “Illegal fishing and trading is not only a threat to sustainability and the environment, it also provides the basis for a vast black economy. The fisheries sector is international and knows no boundaries, and we must have zero tolerance for illegal fishing, whether it happens in our waters or elsewhere.”

Anti-Poverty Activist Awarded $250,000 World Food Prize WASHINGTON, DC, July 2, 2015 (ENS) – Sir Fazle Hasan Abed of Bangladesh has been awarded the 2015World Food Prize, given in recognition of those whose achievements alleviate hunger and promote global food security. Calling the $250,000 award a “great honor,” Sir Fazle said, “I consider this award recognition of the work of BRAC, which I have had the privilege to lead over the last 43 years.”

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Sir Fazle Hasan Abed at the Clinton Global Initiative in is role as president of the Women Entrepreneur Association of Bangladesh, Sept. 2013 (Photo courtesy CGI)

BRAC, formally known as the Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee, has been hailed as the most effective anti-poverty organization in the world. Its agricultural and development innovations have improved food security for millions and contributed to a decline in poverty levels through its direct effects on farmers and small communities across the globe. “The real heroes in our story are the poor themselves and, in particular, women struggling with poverty,” said Sir Fazle. “In situations of extreme poverty, it is usually the women in the family who have to make do with scarce resources.” “When we saw this at BRAC, we realized that women needed to be the agents of change in our development effort,” he said. “Only by putting the poorest, and women in particular, in charge of their own destinies, will absolute poverty and deprivation be removed from the face of the Earth.” This year’s World Food Prize winner was announced by U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack at the U.S. State Department. The event was hosted by Assistant Secretary of State for Economic and

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Business Affairs Charles Rivkin, with Ambassador Kenneth Quinn, president of the World Food Prize Foundation. Awarded by the World Food Prize Foundation, the $250,000 prize honors Sir Fazle’s unparalleled achievement in building the unique, integrated development organization BRAC, which is headquartered in Bangladesh and operates programs in 10 other countries around the globe.

Sir Fazle with some of the children he advocates for (Photo courtesy World Food Prize)

Since he created it over 40 year ago, Sir Fazle’s organization has provided the opportunity for nearly 150 million people worldwide to improve their lives, have enhanced food security and follow a pathway out of poverty through its dynamic and effective development programs. Said Ambassador Quinn, “At a time when the world confronts the great challenge of feeding over nine billion people, Sir Fazle Abed and BRAC, the organization he founded and leads, have created the preeminent model being followed around the globe on how to educate girls, empower women and lift whole generations out of poverty.” Today BRAC operates 18 financially and socially profitable enterprises, across health, agriculture, livestock, fisheries, education, green energy, printing and retail sectors. BRAC has been responsible

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

for extraordinary advancements in the poultry, seed, and dairy industries in Bangladesh and other countries in which it operates in Africa. “For this monumental achievement, Sir Fazle truly deserves recognition as the 2015 World Food Prize Laureate,” said Ambassador Quinn. Sir Fazle’s award comes shortly after Bangladesh was applauded in a United Nations report for successfully meeting the Millennium Development Goal of halving hunger by the year 2015. In his formal remarks, Ambassador Quinn praised the leadership and policies of the Bangladesh government which led to this dramatic achievement. Sir Fazle will receive the World Food Prize at a ceremony in the distinguished Iowa State Capitol building in Des Moines, on the evening of October 15. The event is the centerpiece of an annual three-day international symposium entitled the Borlaug Dialogue, which draws over 1,200 people from 65 countries to consider cutting-edge issues in global food security. Also scheduled for World Food Prize week is the Iowa Hunger Summit on October 13, as well as the three-day Global Youth Institute designed to inspire the next generation of high school students to explore careers in agriculture and fighting hunger.

Eating Chicken, Not Beef, Yields Climate Benefits GOTHENBURG, Sweden, April 7, 2015 (ENS) -Eating beef is one of the biggest climate villains, but a vegan diet is not necessary to reach climate goals, finds new research from Chalmers University of Technology. A poultry-based diet is a smart and inexpensive way to reduce our impact on the climate. The trend all over the world is the same: an increasing number of people are eating an increasing amount of beef, although this trend runs counter to the goal of limiting the temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius as governments agree to do at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen in 2009.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Black Angus cattle in the United States (Photo courtesy USDA)

“Cattle ranching is already responsible for 15 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions that humans cause. The diet we are accustomed to in wealthy countries is not consistent with our climate goals,” says Chalmers researcher David Bryngelsson, whose doctoral thesis concerns land use, food related greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change. He examined how the climate would be impacted if humans were to change their diet. People may have heard that that a vegetable diet results in less greenhouse gases. But Bryngelsson’s research shows that we can continue eating animal protein and still make a major contribution to the climate, if we replace beef with poultry and eggs, and cut down on our consumption of milk and cheese. “Even people who eat an extremely protein-rich LCHF [Low Carb High Fat] diet with chicken as the base make a greater contribution to the environment than vegetarians who consume a great deal of dairy products,” he said. Bryngelsson believes that climate gains will prevail even with more chicken-friendly production methods. Technical improvements in the production chain can reduce the food industry’s climate impact, but cattle are still the biggest problem because they need a lot of feed and release the greenhouse gas

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

methane as they ruminate. Cows belch large amounts of methane while chewing their cud, something chickens do not do. Forests are disappearing to make room for the increasing number of cattle, which also impacts the climate. “Changing our consumption is the most effective way to reduce the impact food has on the climate, and my studies show that it would also make it much less expensive to reach climate goals on a global level compared to merely making changes in the energy and transport sector.”

Broiler chickens graze on organic pastures and live in pens that protect them from predators, direct sun light, and wind at Nick’s Organic Farm, owned by Nick Maravell in Adamstown, Maryland (Photo courtesy USDA)

“Since around 70 percent of all agricultural land is currently used to raise cattle, converting to a more energy-efficient diet of poultry would free up land for cultivation of for example bioenergy,” says Bryngelsson, who has also studied that possibility. “It has been claimed that we can cultivate bioenergy on previously unutilized, less fertile land,” said Bryngelsson. “My models, however, show that this would result in a poorly functioning market, where land owners ultimately earn more by planting bioenergy crops on their prime land instead of using it

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

for our crucial vegetables as is currently the case. We quite simply have to accept that cultivation of bioenergy will compete with food production for prime farming land.” Bryngelsson’s studies show that a vegan diet is still the most climate-friendly, since plant based food is more efficiently produced than livestock based, but the greatest gains are to be had by discontinuing products from cattle. The benefits to the climate when moving away from a poultry diet to a vegan diet are relatively minor compared to moving away from cattle to poultry, he says. “We have done our calculations based on a diet similar to the one most of us eat today, but which is still greatly beneficial to the climate. You could say that chicken is like an electrical car – it is a better alternative, yet still very similar to what we are accustomed to.” There is no doubt that the chicken leaves a smaller carbon footprint regardless of production method. This is because a hen can have around 150 chicks per year as compared to a cow that can give birth to not quite one calf per year, and because chicks grow extremely quickly and thus absorb a greater proportion of their feed. Intensity of emissions is basically the same for eggs and chicken meat, so Bryngelsson concludes that eggs are also climate smart compared to beef and dairy products.

U.S. Approves First Genetically Engineered Apples

WASHINGTON, DC, February 13, 2015 (ENS) – The first genetically engineered apples were today approved for planting and sale in the United States by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The two approved apple varieties are genetically engineered to resist browning. They were developed by the Canadian company Okanagan Specialty Fruits Inc. and will be marketed as the Arctic® Granny and Arctic® Golden.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Arctic apples will be labeled, but the labels with not state that they are genetically engineered. (Photo courtesy OSF) The USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, APHIS, said it is taking this action based on a final plant pest risk assessment that finds the genetically engineered apples “are unlikely to pose a plant pest risk to agriculture and other plants in the United States.” APHIS also completed an environmental assessment to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act. The assessment finds that deregulation of these apples “is not likely to have a significant impact on the human environment.” Under the Plant Protection Act, APHIS is required to evaluate whether a new genetically modified plant, such as these apple varieties, are a plant pest risk to agricultural crops or other plants or plant products. If APHIS finds that a new GMO is unlikely to pose a plant pest risk, then under the law, the agency must deregulate the plant, allowing its sale and planting.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Neal Carter, president and founder of Okanagan Specialty Fruits, said this announcement is a monumental occasion for his team. “The commercial approval of Arctic apples, our company’s flagship product, is the biggest milestone yet for us, and we can’t wait until they’re available for consumers.”

British Columbia orchardist Neal Carter, president and founder of Okanagan Specialty Fruits, in his orchard. (Screengrab from video courtesy OSF)

Consumers will have to wait a little longer, though, since apple trees take several years to produce quantities of fruit. “Our focus is working with growers to get trees in the ground. As more trees are planted and they come into commercial production, there will be a slow, but steady market introduction,” Carter explains, estimating Arctic apples will first be available in late 2016 in small, test-market quantities. Here’s how it works. When you bruise, bite or slice an apple, rupturing its cell walls, a chemical reaction that turns the apple brown occurs between an enzyme in the apple known as polyphenol oxidase, PPO, and antioxidant compounds in the apple called phenolics.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Okanagan Specialty Fruits’ team turned down the expression of the apple PPO genes in a process called gene silencing, which utilizes low-PPO genes from other apples. In the end, Arctic apples produce too little PPO to brown. The transformed Arctic apple plantlets are grafted onto rootstock and grow in a tree nursery until they are transplanted to an orchard, just as other commercial apple tree seedlings are propagated. “No frankenfood here, folks,” says Carter, “just apples, now with suppressed PPO to stop enzymatic browning.” Some consumers like the idea of non-browning apples. In October 2014, Okanagan Specialty Fruits issued the results of a mall intercept survey in which consumers shared their thoughts on the benefits of non-browning apples. A cut Arctic apple can be refrigerated in a zip-lock type bag for several days without any noticeable browning, said 86 percent of respondents. Nonbrowning apples save consumers money, since these apples are eaten instead of being thrown away when they turn brown, said 85 percent. Freshcut Arctic apple slices won’t require treatment with lemon juice or chemicals to prevent them from browning, said 84 percent. But not everyone likes the idea of genetically engineered apples, particularly if they are not labeled as such. On Thursday, three Democrats – U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer of California, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Congressman Peter DeFazio of Oregon – joined with Chef Tom Colicchio at a press event in the Capitol to introduce the Genetically Engineered Food Right-to-Know Act.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Democrats announce the introduction of the Genetically Engineered Food Right-to-Know Act. From left, Rep. Peter De Fazio, Sen. Barbara Boxer, Chef Tom Colicchio, Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Feb 12, 2015 (Photo courtesy Office of Senator Boxer)

The bill would require the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA, to clearly label genetically engineered foods so that consumers can make informed choices about what they eat. “Consumers have a right to know what is in the foods they eat and parents have a right to know what they are feeding their families,” Senator Boxer said. “As a consumer and dad, I want to know whether my family is eating food that has been altered artificially in genetics – and the American public wants and deserves to know as well,” Senator Blumenthal said. “We cannot continue to keep Americans in the dark about the food they eat,” Congressman DeFazio said. “More than 60 other countries make it easy for consumers to choose. Why should the U.S. be any different? If food manufacturers stand by their product and the technology they use to make it, they should have no problem disclosing that information to consumers.” “The public wants more information about the food they are buying and how it’s grown,” said Tom Colicchio, owner of Craft Restaurants and co-founder of Food Policy Action. “I applaud Senator Boxer

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

and Representative DeFazio for their leadership, and urge their colleagues to join them, and stand up for the 93 percent of Americans who want to know if their food has been genetically modified.” The FDA currently requires the labeling of over 3,000 ingredients, additives and processes, including labels for juices made “from concentrate,” but the agency has resisted labels for genetically modified foods since 1992, claiming that these foods were not “materially” different from other foods because the genetic differences could not be recognized by taste, smell or other senses. The lawmakers and chef Colicchio object that the FDA’s labeling policy has not kept pace with 21st century food technologies that allow for a wide array of genetic and molecular changes to food that cannot be detected by human senses.

Apples for sale in Dupage, Illinois (Photo credit unknown)

According to surveys, more than 90 percent of Americans support the labeling of genetically engineered foods. In fact, many consumers are surprised to learn that genetically engineered foods are not already labeled. On the other hand, Congressman Mike Pompeo, a Kansas Republican, last year introduced H.R. 4432, The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2014, dubbed by its critics the “DARK [Deny Americans

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

the Right to Know] Act.” This bill would prohibit states from passing their own state-wide GMO labeling laws, and it would continue to allow GMOs to be labeled as “natural.” This bill would make permanent the voluntary labeling system now in place and prevent the FDA from ever requiring GMO labeling in the future. H.R. 4432 is backed by Monsanto, Dow Chemical, the Koch Brothers and food companies such as Pepsi. Since 2012, big food and chemical companies have poured more than $100 million into fighting GMO labeling initiatives in California, Washington, Oregon and Colorado. Arctic apples will be labeled, but the labels will not say the fruit is genetically engineered. The company states on its website, “An “Arctic” label provides real information because anyone who doesn’t already know how they differ from conventional apples can easily find out all the specific details they want. A “GMO” label, on the other hand, would be completely useless and fear inducing, just like all these mandatory labeling initiatives.” Okanagan Specialty Fruits Inc. is currently engaging in a voluntary food safety assessment consultation with the Food and Drug Administration regarding its Arctic® Apples. Other nonbrowning Arctic varieties of fruits, such as peaches, are expected to follow. Carter says it will take “many years” before nonbrowning Arctic fruit is widely distributed.

Sea Shepherd Chases Toothfish Poachers From Australian Waters MELBOURNE, Australia, February 4, 2015 (ENS) – The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society says one of its ships has chased an illegal toothfish-poaching vessel out of its hunting grounds in Australia’s Exclusive Economic Zone onto the high seas of the Southern Ocean. Two poaching vessels, Kunlun and Yongding, were intercepted by the Sea Shepherd ship Sam Simon on Monday, just 50 nautical miles from Australia’s Mawson Base in Antarctica with prohibited fishing gear on their decks.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

The poaching vessel Kunlun sails towards drift ice in an attempt to flee from the Sam Simon. (Photo by Jeff Wirth courtesy Sea Shepherd)

Sam Simon Captain Sid Chakravarty said today he has successfully defended his ship against numerous aggressive intimidating actions of the Interpol-wanted poaching vessel, Kunlun, while in “hot pursuit” of the vessel through drift ice. “In an attempt to hide their illegal operations and deter us from our pursuit, the poachers first made a dangerous attempt to flee through thick drift ice. When that failed, they tried to intimidate us, making multiple, intentional approaches to my vessel which resulted in dangerous, near collision situations,” said Captain Chakravarty. “We have maintained our pursuit for 40 hours in spite of these aggressive, illegal actions, during which time the poachers have been unable to engage in further illegal fishing,” he said. “The captain and officers of the Kunlun have remained hidden behind drawn curtains throughout the pursuit. Bullies are often the biggest cowards and the Kunlun is no exception to this.” The Kunlun and the Sam Simon are now headed north, approximately 2,500 nautical miles southwest of Australia.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

The incident was the second such attack on the Sam Simon in as many days. On Monday, the poaching vessel, Yongding, turned aggressively towards the Sam Simon, crossing within 10 metres of the conservation ship, narrowly avoiding a collision. The Yongding eventually split from the chase and was last seen by the Sam Simon heading east. The poachers are after Patagonian and Antarctic toothfish, usually marketed as Chilean sea bass. These slow-growing fish fetch premium prices in markets and restaurants for their rich, oily flesh.

The poaching vessel Yongding turned toward the Sam Simon, missing a collision by 10 metres. (Photo by Jeff Wirth courtesy Sea Shepherd Global)

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Australiaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Antarctic Territory is under attack from these poachers. We have maintained our pursuit of the Kunlun, and will not let them engage in any further illegal fishing activity. However, thanks to the mute response from the Australian government, who maintain an embarrassing silence in the face of this invasion in Australian waters, one more poaching vessel is now on the loose in the Southern Ocean,â&#x20AC;? said Chakravarty. The region is managed by Australia in accordance with its international obligations as a Member of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR).

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Both the Yongding and the Kunlun have Interpol Purple Notices issued for them, and are on the CCAMLR black list of Illegal, Unregulated, Unreported (IUU) fishing boats. Both vessels were flying the Equatorial Guinea flag at the time they were located by the Sea Shepherd. The Yongding and the Kunlun, along with another poaching vessel, the Songhua, are believed by Interpol to have links to a known Spanish crime syndicate. On January 13, following a request from the New Zealand government, all three poaching vessels were issued with Interpol Purple Notices for suspected illegal fishing activity and related crimes. The New Zealand Navy was unsuccessful in its attempt to board the Yongding and the Kunlun after they were discovered operating illegally in the Southern Ocean last month. The New Zealand ship HMNZS Wellington had to return to port to refuel. Between January 6 and 13, the New Zealanders spotted the Yongding, the Kunlun and the Songhua hauling gill nets laden with toothfish in a CCAMLR regulated area, where such fishing methods are prohibited. The three vessels, which were sighted travelling together in December 2014, “have all changed their names, national registration and other identifying characteristics on multiple occasions to try and avoid detection,” interpol said, announcing the Purple Notices on January 13. The Songhua has been on the CCAMLR illegal vessel list “following an investigation in 2008 when it was named the Paloma V, which was previously associated with the Vidal Armadores syndicate,” Interpol states. “Since then, the Songhua has used at least eight names under six flags and is currently purported to be owned by Eastern Holdings Ltd, believed to be a shell company based out of Belize.”

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Kunlun crew members fishing illegally in the Southern Ocean haul in a Patagonian toothfish. (Photo by New Zealand Defence Force)

Both the Yongding, which has operated under at least 11 different names and nine flags since 2001, and the Kunlun, which has been spotted using at least 10 different names and five flags since 2006, are allegedly owned by Stanley Management Inc., thought to be a shell company based out of Panama, according to the Interpol statement. “New Zealand is committed to doing its part to protect the Southern Ocean and we will continue to work with international partners to take every possible action to deter illegal fishing and prosecute those responsible,” said New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Murray McCully, announcing the decision to request the Interpol Purple Notices. Australia has not responded to the presence of the poaching vessels in Australian waters; now Sea Shepherd is prodding the Australian government to act. “The inaction of the Australian government, choosing to not take up the chase after the HMNZS Wellington was forced to return to port, has allowed the poachers to roam free in these waters. This has directly resulted in the illegal vessels continuing to plunder Antarctica of its vulnerable toothfish populations,” said Chakravarty.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Chakravarty said Sea Shepherd plans to stop the illegal fishing by using the Sam Simon as a blockading tool, putting the conservation vessel behind the poaching vessels when they run their fishing gear out. “The Sam Simon is now committed to blockading the fishing operations of the Yongding and the Kunlun, with the Sea Shepherd once again standing as the last line of defence for the marine life of Antarctica,” he said. The Australian Greens Spokesperson for Fisheries, Senator Peter Whish-Wilson, says that New Zealand’s efforts to use its Navy to round up illegal toothfish poachers in the Southern Ocean shows how pitiful the Australian government’s efforts have been. “The Australian government is frozen with inaction as these illegal activities are carried out under their nose,” said Whish-Wilson.

Chilean sea bass as served in a Los Angeles restaurant (Photo by LWYang) “The Liberals had promised to send the ACV Ocean Protector, our A$150 million dollar, purpose built, Southern Ocean patrol boat, to protect our fisheries. It was part of the Coalition’s fisheries election

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

policy document,” he said. But that vessel is being decommissioned and ADV Ocean Shield has replaced it. “Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing in the Southern Ocean is a major issue. Not only does it impact on fisheries, but it finances organized crime gangs,” said Whish-Wilson. “The government must meet its election commitment and act by sending the Ocean Shield south,” said Whish-Wilson. “Otherwise it is allowing organised crime gangs to operate with impunity.” The Yongding and the Kunlun are two of six remaining outlaw vessels, which Sea Shepherd calls the “Bandit 6”, that are known to be involved in IUU fishing of toothfish inside the CCAMLR region in the Southern Ocean. On January 16, the Sam Simon completed an operation to retrieve illegal gillnets from the Southern Ocean, after they were abandoned by another of the “Bandit 6” poaching vessels, the Nigerian-flagged Thunder. More than 70 kilometers (45 miles) of illegal gillnet was retrieved over a three-week period and over 1,400 fish were returned to the ocean. Fellow Sea Shepherd ship, the Bob Barker, is currently engaged in a record-breaking pursuit of the Thunder, which today entered its 47th day. The outlaw poaching vessels are the focus of Sea Shepherd’s current Southern Ocean Defence Campaign, Operation Icefish, which began last December. Operation Icefish is Sea Shepherd’s 11th Southern Ocean Defence Campaign and the first to target toothfish poachers in Antarctic waters. The other campaigns have targeted the Japanese whaling fleet. The Japanese said that this year they would only count, not kill, whales in the Southern Ocean after the International Court of Justice ruled in March 2014 that Japan’s lethal “research” whaling program is illegal. Chakravarty has said that Sea Shepherd ships will keep an eye on Japan’s minke-whale surveillance to make sure Japanese whalers are not actually killing any of the animals this year.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Brazilian Lab Turns Fruits, Veggies Into Edible Plastic BRASILIA, Brazil, January 14, 2015 (ENS) – Imagine putting a pizza in the oven without having to remove the plastic casing that protects the pizza from contamination. The plastic film consists of tomatoes and, when heated, it will become part of the pizza. This edible plastic has been developed by researchers at the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Embrapa Instrumentation, a state-owned company affiliated with the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture. In fact, the researchers have made edible plastic films from foods such as spinach, papaya and guava as well as tomatoes. “We can use the waste food industry to manufacture the material. This ensures two features of sustainability: the use of food waste and replacing synthetic packaging that would be discarded,” says the coordinating scientist on the project, Luiz Henrique Capparelli Mattoso.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Scientist Luiz Henrique Mattoso, left, and students Marcos Lorevice and Caio Otoni display edible plastic made from papayas. (Photo by Flavio Ubiali / Embrapa)

Mattoso says that Embrapa’s work to develop plastic films from tropical fruits is a world first. The material has physical features similar to conventional plastics, such as resistance and texture, and is equal in its ability to protect food. The fact that it can be eaten opens a vast field to be explored by the packaging industry. Mattoso pictures spiced wrapping material for poultry, and soup packages that can dissolve with their contents in boiling water. The research that produced edible plastic was developed within the network of Nanotechnology Applied to Agribusiness (AgroNano) and received investments equivalent to US$75,000. The edible plastic is made of dehydrated food mixed with a nanomaterial which has the setting function. “The greatest challenge of this research was to find the ideal formulation, the recipe of ingredients and proportions so that the material had the features we needed,” says materials engineer José Manoel Marconcini, an Embrapa researcher who participated in the work. He explains that the food used as the feedstock passes through a type of dehydration in which, after the food is frozen, all the water contained in it turns from a solid state directly into gas, without passing through the liquid phase. The result is a completely dehydrated food with the advantage of keeping its nutritional properties. It can be applied to many different foods such as fruits, vegetables, legumes and even some types of seasonings, which explains the great diversity of edible raw materials that can flavor and color the plastic. The development of the edible plastic material was the result of work that started two decades ago, when Mattoso began his studies in materials science at Embrapa. “In the beginning, the concern was to use materials from renewable sources studying alternatives to synthetic polymers derived from petroleum,” recalls Mattoso. To accomplish this, the group began to add natural fibers to synthetic plastics, generating composites with the two types of raw material.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Sisal, cotton, jute, coir and bagasse were some natural fibers tested. Mattoso says that in laboratory testing they were more resistant to traction and impacts, in addition to being up to three times stronger than the 100 percent synthetic polymers. Before discovering how to make edible plastic, the research team developed biodegradable polymers, driven by the demand for packaging easily absorbed into the environment in a short time. Finally, they arrived at edible plastic, after incorporating higher standards of safety and hygiene in the manufacturing process. Now the scientists have increased the food’s shelf life by adding added chitosan, an antibacterial polysaccharide found in the exoskeletons of crabs. This natural molecule has antibacterial properties which can extend the length of time food can remain fresh on the shelf. “How long it will take to get to the market depends a lot on the kind of partnership we’ll establish with companies,” said Cauê Riberito, head of the network. “We have to focus on the production process of these items.”

European Parliament Backs GMO Choice for Member States STRASBOURG, France, January 13, 2015 (ENS) – New legislation to allow member states of the European Union to restrict or ban the cultivation of crops containing genetically modified organisms on their own territory, even if this is allowed at the EU level, was passed by the European Parliament on Tuesday. The legislation, informally agreed by Parliament and Council in December, was originally tabled in 2010 but was then deadlocked for four years due to disagreement between pro-GMO and anti-GMO member states.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

A field of Monsanto’s genetically modified corn, or maize MON810, in Europe (Photo courtesy Monsanto Europe) The agreement negotiated with EU ministers in December was approved in Parliament today by 480 votes to 159, with 58 abstentions. The new legislation will come into force in the spring of 2015 if it is approved by the European Council, made up of the heads of state or government of the EU’s 28 member states, along with the council’s own president and the president of the European Commission. This law is in response to Europeans’ growing concerns about GMOs, as shown by Eurobarometer surveys. “This agreement will ensure more flexibility for member states who wish to restrict the cultivation of the GMOs in their territory. It will, moreover, signpost a debate which is far from over between proand anti-GMO positions” said Frédérique Ries, a Belgian MEP and member of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) Party, who is steering the legislation through Parliament.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

“As to what comes next, I place my trust in Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s formal pledge to strengthen the democratic process on GMOs in Europe and ensure that research is genuinely independent,” Ries said. Ries said the change is needed as countries kept being taken to court to justify why they had banned a certain GMO crop. “I don’t think it’s a good idea that legislation is being created by courts,” she said.

Legislation should be decided by lawmakers, not courts, MEP Frédérique Ries told reporters, Jan. 13, 2015. (Photo courtesy European Parliament) European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis of Lithuania welcomed the European Parliament’s approval of choice for EU member states regarding GMO cultivation. “The European Parliament’s vote in favor of the legislative proposal on GMO cultivation brings us one step closer to providing Member States with tools to decide on cultivation of EU authorised GMOs on their territory, based on reasons other than risk on health and the environment,” said Andriukaitis today.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

“The agreement meets Member States’ consistent calls since 2009, to have the final say on whether or not GMOs can be cultivated on their territory, in order to better take into account their national context,” the commissioner said. The agreement retains a strong risk assessment and authorization system for GMOs guaranteeing a high and uniform level of safety throughout the EU,” Andriukaitis said. “I fully trust that this legislation will be endorsed in the coming weeks by the Council, allowing the member states to start exercising their extended capacities to decide on GMO cultivation as from spring this year.” The new rules will allow any of the EU’s 28 member states to ban GMOs on environmental policy grounds other than the risks to health and the environment already assessed by the European Food Safety Authority. Member states could also ban GMO crops on other grounds, such as town and country planning requirements, socio-economic impact, avoiding the unintended presence of GMOs in other products and farm policy objectives. Bans could include groups of GMOs designated by crop or trait. Farmers will have to comply with whatever their government decides. If their government opts for a ban on GMOs, then the farmer will not be able to cultivate them. “I hope that when the legislation is updated, there will be an obligation to compensate farmers who are affected by this,” said Ries. Member states will be able to ensure that GMO crops do not contaminate other products, and particular attention should be paid to preventing cross-border contamination with neighboring countries, the bill states. Before a member state may adopt such measures, the legislation provides for a procedure enabling the GMO crop company to consent to such restrictions on its marketing authorization. However, if the company disagrees, the member state may impose a ban unilaterally. MON810 maize, or corn, is currently the only genetically modified crop cultivated in the European Union. MON 810 corn is a genetically modified maize used around the world. It is a line known as YieldGard from the company Monsanto.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

Larvae of the European corn borer damaged this corn plant. (Photo by Eric Bohnenblust / Penn State)

This genetically modified organism corn is designed to combat crop loss due to insects. There is an inserted gene in the DNA of MON810 which allows the plant to make a protein that harms insects that try to eat it. The inserted gene is from the Bacillus thuringiensis which produces the Bt toxin that is poisonous to insects in the Lepidoptera order, including the European corn borer. Monsanto Europe blogged on its website today, “We have already commented on this sad piece of legislation many times, and our position remains the same: This is a bad move for Europe. It undermines science, it undermines European farmers, and it raises prices for European consumers.” MON810 maize was approved for use in the European Union in 1998. Since then, six countries have grown it and six countries: Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary and Luxembourg have banned its cultivation under an emergency temporary provision due to concerns that it causes environmental damage.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

In Italy its cultivation has been banned since July 12, 2013, when the Italian Health minister required the suspension of the authorization of GM maize’s cultivation, in reaction to a scientific report by the Italian Agricultural Research Council. The Amflora genetically modified potato was banned by the EU General Court in 2013 after initial approval by the European Commission. Monsanto Europe blogged today, “We have withdrawn all applications for the cultivation of new biotech crops in Europe, and have no plans to submit any new ones anytime soon. But that doesn’t mean we don’t think what’s unfolding in Europe is a tragedy, both for Europe and for the signal that Europe’s anti-scientific hysteria about supposed ‘Frankenfoods’ is sending the rest of the world.”

EU Countries Granted the Right to Ban GMO Crops BRUSSELS, Belgium, December 4, 2014 (ENS) – A political agreement on new legislation to allow EU member states to restrict, or ban, the cultivation of crops containing genetically modified organisms, GMOs, on their own territory, even if it is allowed at EU level, was reached by Parliament and Council delegations last night. Starting next spring, member states will be able to ban GMOs stating environmental policy objectives as a justification. These objectives would relate to environmental impacts other than the risks to health and environment assessed during the scientific risk assessment.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

A rapeseed field in northern Germany (Photo byTravelswiss1)

Bans could also include groups of GMOs designated by crop or trait. GMO crops in Europe include: corn, soy, sugar beet and rapeseed, among others. Speaking for the Italian Presidency of the EU, Italy’s Environment Minister Gian Luca Galletti said, “With the agreement in principle reached between the Council, the Commission and the EU Parliament in Brussels we are approaching a great European goal under the Italian Presidency: the recognition of sovereignty and autonomy of the single States as regards the cultivation of GMOs.” Galletti said the negotiators reached “a fair and balanced compromise, enhancing the realities of the single States and creating, finally, the necessary conditions to ensure the freedom of choice at national level with respect to the cultivation of GMOs.” European institutions “have showed great responsibility and attention as regards a very delicate issues, which concerns the whole society, from farmers to consumers,” Galletti concluded. The agreement in principle comes after years of intense debate on this issue. Producers of GMO seeds and crops claim that the technology and the foods it producers are just as safe as naturally produced crops. They claim a scientific consensus supports their position.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

On the other hand, the European Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibilities (ESSER) said in October 2013 that “the claimed consensus on GMO safety does not exist” and “the claim that it does exist is misleading and misrepresents the currently available scientific evidence and the broad diversity of opinion among scientists on this issue.” “The claim encourages a climate of complacency that could lead to a lack of regulatory and scientific rigour and appropriate caution, potentially endangering the health of humans, animals, and the environment,” ESSER said in a formal statement. Environmental risks posed by genetically modified crops include the effects of Bt insecticidal crops on non-target organisms and effects of the herbicides used in tandem with herbicide-tolerant GM crops. ESSER warned, “As with GM food safety, no scientific consensus exists regarding the environmental risks of GM crops.”

Activists in protective clothing display a banner reading ‘No GMO’s X’ in a GE contaminated field in Pordenone, Italy, July 30, 2010. (Photo byGreenpeace France)

Greenpeacers from Italy, Austria, France, Germany and Hungary, among other countries, have been campaigning against GMO crops for years, as have other environmental and public health organizations.

Compare leasing and finance vendors online

MEP Frédérique Ries of Belgium has been steering the measure through Parliament. “The agreement reached last night on the directive, which goes into effect Spring 2015, will ensure more flexibility for member states who wish to restrict the cultivation of the GMOs in their country,” she said. “It will, moreover, signpost a debate which is far from over between pro- and anti-GMO positions. As to what comes next, I place my trust in Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s formal pledge to strengthen the democratic process on GMOs in Europe and ensure that research is genuinely independent,” said Ries, who is with the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe. The informal agreement reached last night is to be discussed in the member states’ Permanent Representatives Committee (COREPER) on December 10 and still needs to be backed by Parliament’s Environment Committee and the full House, as well as by member states. The legislation is expected to be voted in plenary in January 2015. “This agreement was long overdue and we welcome this result, if confirmed by the Council and the House. Member states wishing to restrict or ban GMOs would now have the possibility to do so, without facing the risk of being taken to court. It is important to let the member states take a decision in full subsidiarity, and to listen to our citizens, who, in certain member states, refuse to have GMOs forced upon them,” said Environment Committee Chair MEP Giovanni La Via. The EU’s new Health and Food Safety Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis of Lithuania welcomed the agreement. If it is confirmed, he said, “it would meet member states’ consistent calls since 2009 to have the final say on whether or not GMOs can be cultivated on their territory, in order to better take into account their national context and, above all, the views of their citizens.” The agreed text of the new measure is in line with President Juncker’s commitment to give the democratically elected governments at least the same weight as scientific advice when it comes to important decisions concerning food and environment, said Andriukaitis. “I fully trust that this agreement in principle will be formally endorsed in the coming weeks by the European Parliament and the Council, allowing the member states to start exercising their extended capacities to decide on GMO cultivation as from spring 2015,” he said.